[00:51] <magcius> [###################-] 199212KB   183KB/s | Fetching revisions:Inserting stream:Walking content 8911/8911
[00:51] <magcius> It's been doing this for about a half an hour now.
[19:02] <ronny> hi
[19:02] <ronny> what could case bzr to yank 'No handlers could be found for logger "bzr"'
[19:02] <ronny> also lots of logging messages
[19:02] <jelmer> ronny, hi
[19:03] <jelmer> ronny, IIRC there is a logging setup function you can call to have it log to ~/.bzr.log
[19:03] <jelmer> or you can set up something custom to handle logging
[19:03] <ronny> jelmer: this is invoking the cli
[19:03] <jelmer> ronny: Is ~/.bzr.log perhaps not writable?
[19:03] <ronny> inded, it was write protected
[19:04] <ronny> now stuff is fine
[20:07] <timeless_mbp> hello world
[20:07] <timeless_mbp> http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/migration/en/why-switch-to-bazaar.html#rename-tracking-and-smart-merging
[20:07] <timeless_mbp> is there someone here i can talk to about that section?
[20:08] <timeless_mbp> specifically:
[20:08] <timeless_mbp> > not something than can exist and be tracked independently.
[21:01] <bob2> just ask
[21:07] <ronny> timeless_mbp: i suppose you refer to the fact that the statement is a blunt lie?
[21:07] <timeless_mbp> ronny: nah
[21:08] <timeless_mbp> it's grammatically incorrect
[21:08] <timeless_mbp> 'than' should be 'that'
[21:08] <timeless_mbp> i sent an email to the author with a list of errors
[21:08] <timeless_mbp> lying is fine
[21:08] <ronny> oh, heh
[21:08] <timeless_mbp> as long as you don't have any errors in your lies
[21:09] <ronny> please never fix the bible
[21:10] <timeless_mbp> the bible doesn't lie ;-)
[21:10] <timeless_mbp> so no need to worry about fixing it :)
[21:11] <ronny> timeless_mbp: its not even consistent in itself
[21:11] <timeless_mbp> sure
[21:11] <timeless_mbp> but it's a series of stories, not lies :)
[21:11] <timeless_mbp> and surely this is at least a bit offtopic for #bzr
[21:11] <ronny> heh
[21:12] <_habnabit> If I have a file and I'm trying to split it into multiple files, is there any way to keep the revision history in the new files?
[21:13] <timeless_mbp> copy it x times?
[21:13] <_habnabit> Hmm, that would do it.
[21:13] <timeless_mbp> then replace each w/ the portion you want
[21:13] <bob2> alas there is no bzr cp
[21:13] <timeless_mbp> i'm just a hacker, no idea if there's a more correct way in bzr
[21:13] <timeless_mbp> really?
[21:13] <_habnabit> Oh.
[21:13] <_habnabit> Well.
[21:14] <timeless_mbp> http://wiki.bazaar.canonical.com/BzrFileCopies
[21:16] <_habnabit> Looks like it's not implemented.
[21:16] <timeless_mbp> _habnabit: well, it'd work in mercurial ;-)
[21:16] <timeless_mbp> sorry :(
[21:17] <_habnabit> That page also describes that mercurial has inconsistent behavior when copying files. ;D
[21:19] <_habnabit> I'm guessing this means I can't preserve my revision history. Dang.
[21:24]  * timeless_mbp couldn't really parse their paragraph there
[21:30] <timeless_mbp> so
[21:31] <timeless_mbp> i don't think i find mercurial's behavior there odd
[21:32] <timeless_mbp> nor for that matter did pierre having read hgbook afaict based on the remainder of the paragraph
[21:33] <timeless_mbp> roughly speaking, if you rename a file, you've broken your relationship to the original file
[21:33] <timeless_mbp> and if you need to get the merge behavior, you'd just work from a changeset which doesn't have the rename
[21:33] <timeless_mbp> but... it's irrelevant to you, as you couldn't do anything useful anyway
[21:33] <timeless_mbp> you're taking a file and splitting it
[21:33] <timeless_mbp> you're not going to be able to get a useful behavior from renaming the original unsplit file
[21:34] <timeless_mbp> anyway... have fun