/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/12/14/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

mbanai really want to fix the font hinting in TB 300:00
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
=== BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo
mbanano one around to commment?00:25
BUGabundoseems not00:27
maxinux61Does anyone know if there is a PPA for Thunderbird 302:15
micahgmaxinux61: I have the last build in my PPa: https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/02:19
micahgit's still labeled shredder though02:19
micahgmaxinux61: oops, wrong PPA02:19
micahgmaxinux61: https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-beta02:20
maxinux61micahg: Many thanks!02:25
maxinux61Micahg: How stable is the Firefox 3.6 in your PPA?03:03
micahgmaxinux61: the one in the -beta PPA is FIrefox 3.6 Beta 5, I use it03:04
maxinux61Cool, I will give it a try. Thanks again.03:04
micahgI find it faster than 3.5 with almost no problems03:04
maxinux61Great. I have Thunderbird installed and running. It is great.03:05
=== asac_ is now known as asac
gnomefreaki think i like this :)11:13
gnomefreakok i like just some things need to be conversation11:18
asachi gnomefreak11:19
gnomefreakasac: hi11:19
asacwhat do you like?11:19
gnomefreaklubuntu11:19
asacah11:19
asacintersting11:19
gnomefreakbrb there is another desktop (i think came with it)11:20
ftahi11:32
ftaasac, you can copy the codecs now11:32
asacfta: already done11:37
asacthey are already built11:37
asacchromium is now building11:37
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/nss3.12.3/+packages11:37
asacfta: codecs might need some love for sparc/ppc/ia6411:37
ftaasac, well, chromium should be 1st, but it will be tough. i'm not candidate, i don't have access to those arches11:49
gnomefreakwhen i go to install something in debian chroot i get the following12:01
gnomefreakdpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting: syntax error: unknown group 'Debian-exim' in statoverride file12:01
gnomefreakE: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)12:01
gnomefreakhow do i fix that. only debian chrrots give me that12:01
asacadd a Debian-exim group?12:01
asacfeels wrong though12:01
gnomefreakwell that is kind of bad if i have to do that12:03
gnomefreakhow do i add someone to a group on terminal. it cant hurt to try i guess12:04
asacgnomefreak: is that lucid?12:12
asactry setup karmic chroot and dist-upgrade to lucid then12:12
gnomefreakasac: the chroot is sid12:16
gnomefreakalso happens on lenny. no ubuntu chroots have that issue12:16
asachmm12:16
asacnot sure12:16
asachavent installed it for ages ;)12:17
asacmaybe debian is now using cdebootstrap by default?12:17
gnomefreaknot sure maybe i will remove then and just have lucid and karmic chroots12:18
ftaasac, were you able to debug your oh-snap on arm?12:32
asacfta: no.12:32
asactrashed stack12:32
asacinfinite recursion in libc abort12:32
asacthats the only thing i could see12:32
ftadoh12:32
asacbut i am building latest upstream. afaik they12:32
asaclanded arm stuff now again12:33
asacso i hope it just disappears12:33
asacotherwise have to check with doko how to tell the linker to actually dump the symbol that is "virtual" only12:33
asacso yeah. for now its a "pure virtual method called" ...12:33
asacwhich means that there is a C++ abstract virtual class that is not fully implemented for arm12:33
asacether because a file is not compiled/linked in12:34
asacor its just not implemented12:34
asaci guess the former12:34
asac... or we dont build everything12:35
asacwhich i hope isnt the case12:35
asacthough to be sure i would need to build using upstream instructions i guess12:35
asacwill try that once i get my USB disc working again on arm/ lucid12:35
asacatm its brokenish12:35
asace.g. working on SD drives only ;)12:36
ftadid you try in --single-process mode?12:36
asacyes12:38
asacsame backgtrace12:38
asacinifite abort12:38
asacjust crashing right away12:38
ftatry to build in Debug mode then12:42
asacyeah12:46
ftaupdated http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/ChromiumBrowserVsGoogleChrome12:52
ftahttp://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxChromiumPackages is starting to grow nicely12:53
asac"New releases are tested before sending to users"12:55
ftawhere?12:59
ftai can't say that for us as i publish directly in the ppa, so even if i make no announcement, it's available to anyone upgrading13:00
ftaasac, fedora packaged gclient separately13:18
ftai didn't13:18
ftathey're tracking v8 2.0.*13:19
ftaand doing a shared build of chromium13:19
ftawithout ffmpeg13:19
sindhudweepasac: can you review (and merge if it meets your approval) https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gnash/gnash/ubuntu.head/+merge/15590 when it is convenient?13:39
asacsindhudweep: this enables the kde4 backend again?14:12
asacor just enables it explicitly?14:13
asacis kdelibs5-dev the right thing to include for qt/kde stuff?14:13
asacisnt it something like xlibs-dev thats only their for developers14:13
asacbut should be done more fine grained for packages (sorry, not up-to-date on kde packaging best practices)14:14
asacis kde4-gnash the only binary shipped/needed for that?14:14
sindhudweepasac: all good questions. I will look into each of those and get back to you with either fixes or a rationale for the points you made.15:07
sindhudweepthanks again.15:07
mbanaasac: hello ...15:11
mbanado i need to restart TB 3 to see .fonts.conf changes15:11
asacmbana: yes15:17
mbanaasac: please fonts your .confs online15:19
asacmine is zero15:20
asacnada15:21
asacnon-existing15:21
asaconly default system font configs15:21
* asac lunch15:21
debfxasac: could you please review my changes for the firefox kde integration? (bug #494067)16:12
ubottuLaunchpad bug 494067 in xulrunner "Provide better Firefox KDE integration" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49406716:12
asacdebfx: we need per-bug-per-attachment patches16:46
asac(upstream bug id + attachment id)16:46
debfxasac: the patches aren't on the mozilla bugtracker16:47
asacwhere are they?16:48
debfxhttp://gitorious.org/firefox-kde-opensuse/16:50
debfxthough I had to modify the patch a bit as opensuse based it on a patched xulrunner (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=327323)16:53
asacdebfx: then bnc patches?16:53
ubottuMozilla bug 327323 in File Handling "Can't "Open with" files that are send as application/octet-stream (or other "unknown to firefox" mime types)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]16:53
debfxasac: bnc?16:55
mbanaasac: there's a bug if the rendering of TB 3 and FF 3.5 differ right?16:56
asacmbana: depends16:59
asacif both use system-cairo etc. then yes16:59
asacif one uses systme-cairo and the other in-source cairo ... its most likely because of that17:00
asacdebfx: bnc ... like mentioned in gitoroius commits17:00
asacUse the mimetype for opening urls when known (bnc#556156)17:00
asacnot sure if they have individual bugs17:01
asacin any case. can you check with the kde dev that does that?17:01
asacwe need to get the patches at least in bugzilla17:01
micahgasac: regarding TB3, I targeted all the bugs I could find, so that I can make the changelog, but no result from the TB devs yet on which files I need for the -dev package17:07
debfxyou want the kde dev to upload the patches to bugzilla?17:08
asacmicahg: ok.17:21
asac_Tsk_: we have a problem with tb3 ... we need to provide a -dev package with the headers etc.17:21
asachowver, make install doesnt install that17:21
micahgasac: I tried copying the files we use in the TB2 package with no success17:22
asacnot sure how to best do it. most likely we want the full sdk copyied17:22
asacmicahg: upstream build system needs to be fixed to also install the sdk17:22
micahgah, ok17:22
micahgI think you mentioned that before17:23
mbanaasac: does TB 3 use the it's own cairo?17:24
mbanafrom the ppa17:24
micahgmbana: 3.0 uses system cairo on karmic and higher17:25
mbanaso that probably explains it.  the TB 3 from mozilla and from the ppa render the same17:25
mbanano anti-aliasing17:26
mbanai'm using jaunty17:26
micahgyep, that sounds right :)17:26
micahgasac: I should probably file a bug on b.m.o for the SDK to be installed17:27
asacmbana: for non-system-cairo fonts are worse17:28
asacyou should use karmic17:28
asactb3 wont be for jaunty anyway17:28
mbanaah man!  that's a complete pain.  i hate updating17:29
mbanais there no workaround?17:29
asacnot that i know.17:30
asacmicahg: yes.17:31
asacok out17:32
asacbbi 2h17:32
micahgasac: mozilla bug 53465117:36
ubottuMozilla bug 534651 in Build Config "make install should install the SDK for Thunderbird 3" [Normal,New] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53465117:36
asacthx17:40
mbanahow about backports?  installing a newer ver. onto an old distro17:41
asacthats bad17:42
asacyou need a new gtk + cairo17:42
asacmight cause issues for other apps17:42
_Tsk_asac:  how do you usualy build it for ff ?17:44
asac_Tsk_: ffox does not have specific headers, we use xulrunner17:44
asacthats what is providing the sdk17:45
asaci am not sure if firefox standalong would do the right thing on make install17:45
asacbut i would hope yes.17:45
_Tsk_ppl in #maildev will be on the spot better than I will17:45
asacthough might be its only happening for xulrunner build17:45
asacyes. out though ;)17:45
* asac bounces back and froth from action to computer atm17:45
asaci will check in maildev when i return17:45
* asac out 100%17:46
mbanawhen is hte next ubuntu LTS release?17:47
asacthis17:49
asacrelease17:50
* asac out 110%17:50
asac;)17:50
micahgmbana: Lucid in April17:50
* micahg will bbiab17:50
mbanawhy didn't it occur to build TB 3 with system cairo on <karmic17:51
mbanai found this https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45861217:53
mbana (Ubuntu) system fontconfig settings override GNOME font rendering screen settings17:54
ubottuMozilla bug 458612 in Graphics "(Ubuntu) system fontconfig settings override GNOME font rendering screen settings" [Normal,Resolved: invalid]17:54
mbanaok too risky to update18:00
mbanathanks for the help tho18:00
mbanawish me luck18:09
mbanai'll upgrade18:09
ftalol, http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/6fd4bb500d425c406c1b52f66e5b195b20ae5e0a19:33
Mook_sbyeah, they're using chromium for IPC for out-of-process stuff19:39
ftachromium also uses some parts of moz, like libnss and a subset of the testsuite19:45
mbanaasac: ok i've upgraded :).  biggest problem, not that i'm expecting you fix it, the cursor is constantly showing the busy20:52
mbanaeven tho nothing is running in the back.20:52
mbanaanyhow,20:52
mbanaabout TB 3.020:52
jdstrandasac, fta: so, I need to get the apparmor stuff into firefox-3.6 for karmic. what is the best way to do that, and how do I ensure that 3.7, 3.8, etc have these changes moving forward?21:45
jdstrandasac, fta: hi btw!21:45
jdstrandI'm working in lp:firefox/3.6 right now for lucid21:46
jdstrandonce I have that tested, I'll commit and then want to get that work into the future 3.6 branch for karmic21:46
micahgjdstrand: karmic is 3.5 right now21:48
jdstrandmicahg: I'm aware of that, but 3.5 is EOLd soon and I need to make sure that 3.6 will have the profile21:49
micahgjdstrand: I think all that stuff is moved at release time for the branch21:50
ftajdstrand, when 3.8 will appear, we'll branch 3.7, so if it's in 3.7, we'll get it. but once it's branched, each update will have to be done in all branches :(21:50
* jdstrand makes notes to get at least something into 3.8...21:50
jdstrands/notes/note21:50
jdstrandfta: do you have an eta on 3.8?21:51
micahgjdstrand: yeah, it looks like the apparmor/.desktop translation is only on 3.5 right now21:51
jdstrandfta: once I test things, I'll get it all into 3.7 and 3.621:52
jdstrandis this where all the branches I should care about live? https://code.launchpad.net/~mozillateam21:52
ftaif it's generic enough, it could be done with a cherry pick..21:53
ftayes, all the .head branches21:53
jdstrandgotcha21:53
jdstrandfta: I am making it generic, yes21:53
ftagood21:53
ftai like it when it's generic21:54
jdstrandAPPNAME ftw21:54
jdstrand:)21:54
ftayep :)21:54
micahgfta: I think we should keep the stuff like profiles only in the current release branch so they don't have to be updated constantly21:54
jdstrandI'm not sure that is wise21:54
ftamicahg, apparmor should be everywhere21:55
micahgfta: ok, so then on the branches, it'll be usr.bin.firefox-3.6?21:55
micahgetc..21:55
jdstrandfta: so based on this, if I get my changes into 3.6.head then when you branch that for when 3.5 is EOLd, it should just be there?21:56
ftayes, some subst could help, like for APPNAME21:56
ftaeh?21:56
jdstrandfyi, the packaging for the profile is usr.bin.firefox.apparmor.in21:57
ftayes, once 3.6 gets released, it will be branched from 3.6.head so it wil have apparmor too21:57
jdstrandit is generic too21:57
jdstrandexcellent21:57
jdstrandfta: can you point me in the right direction for getting the source to build 3.6 on lucid (or karmic, I don't care)?21:58
ftathe daily ppa is the best we have, you just have to update changelog with the version currently in the daily ppa21:59
ftaupdate changelog.. in 3.6.head21:59
jdstrandsure, that was my thoughts too21:59
jdstrandwell, I'm not comitting anything to 3.6 just yet ;)22:00
jdstrandfta: thanks for all your help!22:00
ftathank *you* for improving our security :)22:00
jdstrand:)22:01
micahgjdstrand: is the FF profile going to be enabled by default in Lucid?22:02
jdstrandmicahg: the plan is to turn it on be default during the dev cycle, then decide afterwards22:03
jdstrandmicahg: a few things need to happen first though22:03
jdstrandmostly so people have some idea of why things aren't working if they get a denial22:04
BUGabundoguys sorry for the spam but ben laughing so hard with this site, I had to share http://akinator.com/22:16
mbanaBUGabundo: hello22:18
BUGabundohey mbana22:18
=== iggy1 is now known as Iggy1
ftaBUGabundo, I won once22:29
BUGabundoLOL22:29
BUGabundojust once?22:29
BUGabundohow many did you lose?22:29
fta522:31
BUGabundoehehe22:32
BUGabundowho did it misss?22:32
mbanaBUGabundo: so you said, if i don't make TB copy the email i sent into my gmail folder, it'll show it in the thread when i'm browsing in both gmail and TB?22:39
BUGabundoits supposed to, yes22:40
ftaBUGabundo, it's easy to do, it's just an expert system22:43
BUGabundotrue22:45
BUGabundobut very complete22:45
mbanaBUGabundo: mmmmm ... it works :) thanks22:52
BUGabundoI know it does :=)22:54
mbanaBUGabundo: how do you handle deleting?23:04
BUGabundomove to trash23:04
BUGabundoanything else and it will archive them23:05
BUGabundoand by trash I mean the TRUE gmail trash folder23:05
BUGabundonot one faked by TB23:05
mbanaBUGabundo: do you mean "move it to the deleted folder"?23:17
BUGabundono23:19
BUGabundoto Trash folder23:19
mbanais that a TB 3 specific settings?23:20
BUGabundono23:21
BUGabundoits a gmail imap folder23:21
mbanait's gets labelled something like [iamp/trash] ... right?23:25
BUGabundono23:26
mbanais this a bug; 1.  delete the email in thunderbird.   2.  go into gmail and remove the [imap/trash] label.  3.  it appears in the inbox now in gmail.  4.  go to TB, it's no longer in the thread23:26
BUGabundothat's a Fake foldr23:26
BUGabundoat least on TB223:26
mbanaok it seems like it's only available on tb 323:27
mbanafew more questions ;)23:53
mbanais it possible to get rid of the -- before the signature23:53
BUGabundowhy would you ?23:55
BUGabundothat's what makes a sig a sig23:55
BUGabundoits the beginning of a sig23:55
BUGabundodash dash space23:55

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!