[01:33] <eboyjr> I'm trying to make a new Solo project with Bazaar, what is the advantage of creating a repository for the project at the top level and to nest a main branch within it?
[01:34] <eboyjr> I would rather just do: `bzr init` :P
[01:35] <gutworth_> it takes up less space to clone paralell branches
[01:37] <eboyjr> Alright I won't need that for sure.
[01:38] <eboyjr> I have another question: What is a good way to put bzr on a server and modify it with GTK+ programs like Olive from a remote computer?
[07:29]  * fullermd grumbles and shakes his fist at stat's fetish for WT's...
[07:31] <poolie> hi vila?
[07:36] <vila> hi all !
[07:36] <vila> hey poolie !
[07:40] <poolie> hi there
[07:40] <poolie> quick call?
[07:40] <poolie> vila^^
[07:41] <vila> sure
[10:29] <Okkin> Hi, I have a probleme on svn synchronization after upgrading from bazaar 1.8 - bzr-svn 0.4.14 to bzr 2.0 - bzr-svn 1.0.0
[10:30] <Okkin> bzr pull returns bzr: ERROR: These branches have diverged.
[10:30] <Okkin> Is there a solution?
[10:33] <Okkin> The branches cannot diverge because it's a read only repository
[10:33] <Kinnison> perhaps you committed locally?
[10:34] <Okkin> No as i said it's a read only repository
[10:34] <Kinnison> try running 'bzr missing --mine-only' and see what it lists
[10:35] <Okkin> it returns all the commit list that came from the svn repo
[10:35] <Okkin> in fact it's all the commit since the creation of the branch
[10:37] <Kinnison> Hmm, that suggests that the commit IDs changed or something happened in how the bzr-svn integration works
[10:37] <Okkin> yep
[10:38] <lifeless> yes, a long time back
[10:38] <lifeless> bzr svn-upgrade
[10:38] <lifeless> IIRC
[10:38] <Okkin> ok
[10:38] <lifeless> its in the svn docs
[10:38] <Okkin> I'm trying
[10:38] <lifeless> bzr-svn docs.
[10:38] <Okkin> Oppps
[10:38] <lifeless> I suggest you read them before doing anything.
[10:40] <Okkin> The doc is the FAQ file isn't it?
[10:59] <Okkin> Sorry but I can't find insterresting docs about svn-upgrade
[10:59] <Okkin> add the command itself is not present in my bzr-svn installation
[11:01] <lifeless> Okkin: try filing a question on bzr-svn then
[11:02] <Okkin> you mean bzr-svn chanel?
[11:11] <Okkin> Ok I find a solution by setting default-mapping = v3 in bazaar.conf
[11:11] <Okkin> But I can't find a way to upgrade my repo
[11:11] <Okkin> Anyway thaks for your help
[11:12] <maxb> bzr foreign-mapping-upgrade?
[11:14] <Okkin> maxb: I didn't try this command but it sounds good
[12:09] <grahal> just did a bzr svn-import but the tags are not being mapped to a bzr revision (although bzr tags does show the tags). Any special option I need to pass to bzr?
[12:09] <grahal> also I find it strange that "trunk" has the tags
[12:13] <jelmer> grahal: What do you mean with "the tags are not being mapped to a revision" ?
[12:13] <grahal> bzr tags shows something like
[12:13] <grahal> 0.9.0        ?
[12:13] <grahal> 0.9.1        ?
[12:14] <grahal> etc...
[12:14] <jelmer> grahal: that's because the revisions that are tagged are not in the trunk branch probably
[12:15] <jelmer> bzr tags --show-ids should show you the revision ids
[12:15] <grahal> hmm, indeed
[12:16] <jelmer> the tags appear in trunk and the other branches
[12:18] <grahal> not sure i'm going things correctly
[12:18] <grahal> but
[12:18] <grahal> I want to import the modules in https://z3ext.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/z3ext/sources/  into separate bzr repos
[12:18] <jelmer> separate bzr branches you mean?
[12:18] <grahal> yep
[12:19] <jelmer> just running "bzr svn-import http://z3ext.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/z3ext/sources/" should be sufficient
[12:19] <jelmer> and create <foo>/trunk directories
[12:21] <grahal> let me try
[13:21] <rubbs> good morning everyone
[13:54] <vila> hi rubbs !
[13:59] <rubbs> hi vila how are you?
[13:59] <vila> fine, thanks, it's winter here, but so is it in half of the planet... :)
[14:02] <rubbs> haha, true. Winter here as well.
[14:03]  * jelmer waves
[14:03] <vila> \o
[14:04]  * rubbs waves back
[14:10] <vila> jam: ping
[14:32] <jam> morning vila
[14:32] <vila> morning jam !
[15:05] <oly>  so bzr checkout subfolder any ideas ? can it be done ?
[15:05] <jelmer> oly, not supported at the moment
[15:05] <oly> ah okay, but its being worked on i take it ?
[15:06] <vila> Isn't it what 'views' are about ?
[15:25] <jam> jelmer: any new plugin releases I should be packaging for 2.0.3 / 2.1.0b4 ?
[15:25] <jam> vila: sort of, but honestly not really
[15:25] <jelmer> jam: bzr-rewrite 0.5.5
[15:26] <jam> for 2.1.0b4 ?
[15:30] <jam> also, I'm pretty sure that explorer 0.10 should be in 2.1.0b4, but what about qbzr?
[15:30] <jam> I don't see a new 0.14 release
[15:30] <jam> so 0.14.5 in 2.0.3 but 0.16 in 2.1.0b4?
[15:30] <jam> I thought there was a 0.17 comingaround
[15:30] <jam> I guess bialix and garyvdm aren't around right now
[15:38] <vila> gee, the weather is bad on FreeNode today... :-/
[15:57] <bialix> tsmith: see this thread http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.bazaar-ng.general/63029
[16:01] <tsmith> bialix, yes that is my problem exactly
[16:01] <tsmith> but i fail to see any responses to that guy?
[16:02] <tsmith> WHAT HTE HELL?
[16:02] <tsmith> bialix, yes that is my problem exactly. but i fail to see any responses to that guy?
[16:02] <tsmith>    184 revisions
[16:02] <tsmith>   2145 file-ids
[16:02] <tsmith>      1 ghost revisions
[16:02] <tsmith>      1 inconsistent parents
[16:02] <tsmith> how do i fix that?
[16:03] <bialix> tsmith: look at the entire thread
[16:03] <bialix> it just URL to first post
[16:03] <tsmith> k
[16:03] <bialix> you have to publish a branch where your ghost revisions present
[16:03] <tsmith> bialix, i see links for Permalink | Reply | Report this as spam
[16:03] <tsmith> no thread links
[16:05] <bialix> tsmith: try there https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2009q4/063569.html
[16:05] <tsmith> AWESOME!
[16:05] <bialix> I'm reading bzr ML via gmane, there is some magic to get thread-view in there
[16:05] <bialix> but I'm using Thunderbird, so...
[16:10] <tsmith> you know, such a horrible bug should not have made it into a major revision (2.0.0)
[16:12] <bialix> it seems freenode storming today
[16:12] <bialix> tsmith: horrible bug?
[16:12] <bialix> I guess you need to work very hard to create ghost
[16:12] <bialix> at least in plain bzr branches
[16:13] <tsmith> no it's really easy!
[16:36] <jam> bialix, tsmith: there is also: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/bazaar/2009q4/thread.html#63569
[16:36] <bialix> hi jam
[16:36] <tsmith> jam, thank you veyr much
[16:37] <tsmith> Man! Freenode is as bad as Undernet in 1998!
[16:38] <jam> hey guys, can you check to see if you can access bzr+ssh on Launchpad? I don't see scheduled downtime, but I want to make sure it isn't just something wrong with my setup.
[16:38] <jam> I get: ... => bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev/: Unable to invoke remote bzr bazaar.launchpad.net; Channel closed.
[16:38] <jam> so the ssh handshake goes through, but it doesn't seem to have 'bzr' on the other end
[16:52] <tsmith> seirously, i'm going to have to give up bzr in about 5 minutes
[16:52] <tsmith> none of this crap wroks and i fear i have perpetually screwed up my repository
[17:00] <bialix> tsmith: you can do it without bad words
[17:00] <bialix> jam: `bzr tags -d lp:qbzr`  works for me
[17:00] <jam> bialix: yeah, I just had the old trunk
[17:00] <jam> I've updated
[17:00] <jam> I'm currently stuck because I can't push to launchpad
[17:01] <jam> but otherwise the installers are getting built
[17:01] <jam> maybe, I'll get a better response here.
[17:01] <jam> any losa's around?
[17:02] <Chex> jam: hi there
[17:02] <Chex> jam: can I help?
[17:03] <jam> hey Chex, I just realized it may be a local configuration fault. I was testing custom remote bzr's, let me check
[17:03] <jam> sorry Chex, it was all my fault
[17:04] <jam> I set "BZR_REMOTE_PATH" and it failed when connecting to lp
[17:04] <jam> which it *should* but our error was poor.
[17:04] <jam> thanks for showing up, though
[17:08] <bialix> jam: ok
[17:13] <bialix> jam: something bad with freenode today, I'd better go home. Send a mail, if something needed from qbzr/explorer side'
[17:24] <Chex> jams: no worries
[17:27] <jam> jelmer: there doesn't seem to be a bzr-rewrite-0.5.5 tag
[18:24] <Morbus> g'day. is there a way i can stop bzr from commiting my entire source tree, when i'm in a subdirectory?
[18:24] <Morbus> if i'm in a/b/c, and bzr commit, i only want to commit c downwards, not ALL of a/.
[18:27] <Morbus> [[[
[18:27] <Morbus> By default bzr always commits all changes to the tree, even if run from a subdirectory. To commit from only the current directory down, use:
[18:27] <Morbus> % bzr commit .
[18:27] <Morbus> ]]]
[18:27] <Morbus> --http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/bzr-0.8/tutorial.html
[18:27]  * Morbus waves.
[18:43] <hazmat> a nice option on bzr stat would be relative only
[18:43] <hazmat> ie only show paths at or below or the current dir
[18:43] <hazmat> i often copy output of stat into a diff or edit tool
[18:43] <NET||abuse> hey guys. think i'm misunderstanding something here,, i have a project on my local machine, i've been working on it and keeping it versioned in a standalone bzr repo... now i want to push my work up to the server, from my local copy i just do bzr push bzr+ssh://me@iptoserver/path/to/bzrdir
[18:44] <NET||abuse> then on the remote server i do bzr up in bzrdir  and it says
[18:44] <NET||abuse> bzr: ERROR: No WorkingTree exists for "file:///path/to/bzrdir"
[18:44] <NET||abuse> sorry,,, add   to the ned     /.bzr/checkout/
[18:45] <NET||abuse> how come i can't checkout to a working copy on the remote server?
[19:52] <jam> hazmat: 'bzr status .' ?
[19:53] <hazmat> jam that still reports path relative to the repo root
[19:53] <hazmat> i'd like it to report paths relative to the current directory
[19:53] <jam> sure, but it only gives the output of that subdir
[19:53] <hazmat> so i can actually use the paths it reports
[19:53] <hazmat> right now i've got to mangle all the paths to be offset relative to my current location
[20:26] <thrope> i get a segmentation fault when I try and push to a svn repo: http://pastie.org/744641
[20:27] <thrope> is it supposed to work? i forgot the syntax - dpush, svn push?
[20:28] <thrope> i'd like to push to a new directory
[20:34] <smoser> hi, i'm playing with bzr builddeb. is there a way to do -S with '-sd' getting through to dpkg-genchanges ?
[20:35] <lifeless> builder="debuild -sd"
[20:35] <lifeless> though -v is generally a better way to control that
[20:35] <RenatoSilva> How to rollback the files to a given revision, just to recover a deleted image, then go back to tip?
[20:36] <RenatoSilva> I'm using a standalone tree
[20:36] <smoser> lifeless, how is '-v' (--verbose?) involved ?
[20:36] <lifeless>   -v<sinceversion>         include all changes later than version.
[20:37] <lifeless> same way --builder="debuild -vxyz"
[20:37] <RenatoSilva> Can I checkout an old revision to another directory?
[20:37] <lifeless> RenatoSilva: revert -r xyz FILE; revert FILE;
[20:38] <RenatoSilva> lifeless: no need to commits? ok
[20:40] <RenatoSilva>  ERROR: Path(s) are not versioned: htdocs/img/edit-confict.png
[20:40] <RenatoSilva> I guess because the file was deleted
[20:41]  * RenatoSilva did bzr revert -r 87 but thinks he should not
[20:44] <RenatoSilva> ok, got it with bzr checkout