[09:42] <asac> fta: is tcmalloc new?
[09:42] <asac> loads of issues with chromium on arm now
[09:42] <asac> e.g. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36800668/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-armel.chromium-browser_4.0.270.0~svn20091213r34444-0ubuntu1~ucd1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[09:43] <asac> fta:... and ... please disable tests on arm ;)
[09:43] <asac> that will avoid ultra long builds ;)
[12:51] <persia> Reminder, Mobile meeting in #ubuntu-meeting in 10 minutes
[12:55] <fta> asac, done: http://paste.ubuntu.com/341857/
[13:00] <asac> fta: rock. have you tested a NON_TEST build locally?
[13:00] <asac> e.g. maybe it ends up with some packaging issues etc.?
[13:02] <fta> it didn't last time i used it
[14:43] <fta> asac, does it build now?
[21:44] <Riotta> hi
[21:46] <Riotta> does anybody have a clue when ARM netbooks/tops will be available for normal consumers?
[21:48] <JamieBennett> Riotta: next year ;)
[21:49] <Riotta> :)
[21:49] <suihkulokki> Riotta: you can already buy Sharp PC-Z1
[21:49] <Riotta> I hope so
[21:49] <JamieBennett> In Japan!
[21:51] <Riotta> ah I dont get something about arm and ubuntu, there is on the wiki that ubuntu support two arm processors freescale and marvel
[21:52] <JamieBennett> yes
[21:53] <Riotta> I know there is a pegatron and freescale two larg companies which made arm processors and freescale processor is supported is ubuntu will operate on pegatron processors also ? is there some compability orsomething or those are all arm clones
[21:53] <Riotta> with same features etc
[21:54] <JamieBennett> They are different architectures that require specific changes to the OS based on the same offerings that ARM provide.
[21:54] <JamieBennett> Different but similar
[21:54] <Riotta> ah so those all processors will have different architectures
[21:54] <Riotta> now I get it
[21:55] <Riotta> so basically you have to compile everything for other arm processor to make it work?
[21:55] <suihkulokki> well it's more like i386-i486-pentium-ppro-p3-p4-..
[21:55] <Riotta> ah
[21:56] <JamieBennett> It could be the same chip design with slight tweaks that require a specific kernel. The Device-Tree work that is ongoing at the moment may allow us to ship more generic releases but that is a little off at the moment.
[21:56] <Riotta> like i380 and atom's lpia
[21:56] <Riotta> okay
[21:56] <suihkulokki> but each arm cpu needs a differnet kernel atm
[21:56] <JamieBennett> same arch (i.e. armel) but different kernel's and tweaks
[21:56] <Riotta> ah
[21:56] <JamieBennett> sorry, should of made that clearer
[21:56] <Riotta> I see it thanks
[21:57] <Riotta> so different kernel but most apps will work on all arms?
[21:57] <Riotta> or same story
[21:58] <JamieBennett> All apps should work the same providing that they are compiled for the same optimisations, i.e. in the current Lucid cycle we are targeting ARMv7 with Thumb2 which is available on only the newer processors from ARM. But if they support this then userspace is pretty much the same across the board.
[21:59] <Riotta> cool
[21:59] <fta> asac, fyi, http://codereview.chromium.org/507007