[00:00] <mbana> BUGabundo: it's not there in the reply
[00:00] <mbana> only when composing new messages
[00:02] <BUGabundo> mbana: ?
[00:03] <mbana> the -- signature
[00:05] <fta> BUGabundo, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/ChromiumBrowserVsGoogleChrome
[00:05] <fta> not much info, we're building it
[00:06] <fta> BUGabundo, also worth knowing for other linux distros: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxChromiumPackages
[00:07] <BUGabundo> thanks
[00:07] <BUGabundo> and Chromium OS?
[00:07] <BUGabundo> anyone you know building it?
[00:07] <BUGabundo> I would love to dual boot it
[00:08] <fta> no idea
[00:09] <BUGabundo> fta does Ch get the extra codecs from system?
[00:09] <fta> nope, you have to choose between chromium-codecs-ffmpeg and chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-nonfree
[00:10] <BUGabundo> so no mp3 for example?
[00:10] <fta> Description: Non-free ffmpeg codecs for the Chromium Browser
[00:10] <fta> ...
[00:10] <fta> In addition to the free ogg, vorbis and theora codecs,
[00:10] <fta>  aac/ac3/mpeg4audio/h264/mov/mp3 are also included.
[00:10] <fta>  See chromium-codecs-ffmpeg if you prefer only the free codecs
[00:11] <BUGabundo> ahh
[00:11]  * BUGabundo checks installed pack
[00:11] <fta> chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-nonfree matches the codecs from the upstream chrome builds
[00:11] <BUGabundo> chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-nonfree:
[00:11] <BUGabundo>   Installed: 0.5+svn20091210r34297+34315+34433-0ubuntu1~ucd1
[00:11] <fta> chromium-codecs-ffmpeg matches the codecs from the upstream chromium builds
[00:15] <mbana> BUGabundo: i have to select the folder manually right?  it's [gmail] -> Trash
[00:15] <BUGabundo> manually?
[00:15] <BUGabundo> we are in the ERA of techonology
[00:15] <BUGabundo> and you are doing stuff manually?
[00:16] <BUGabundo> dude grow up :D
[00:16] <mbana> i think i've found a bug
[00:34] <mbana> i use chrome directly from google
[00:35] <BUGabundo> mbana: you suck :D
[00:36] <BUGabundo> use chromium (beta) instead
[00:36] <BUGabundo> it needs testers for fta
[00:37] <mbana> i mean chromium
[00:37] <mbana> http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/eula_dev.html?dl=unstable_amd64_deb
[00:37] <mbana> is it worth getting it via the ppa?
[00:41] <BUGabundo> that's Chrome
[07:00] <micahg> asac: Firefox 3.0.16 and 3.5.6 to be released today
[07:19] <[reed]> indeed
[07:19] <[reed]> :)
[18:30] <asac> !test
[18:59] <mbana> someone should fix the open link in TB 3
[18:59] <mbana> other apps use the default browser
[18:59] <mbana> it ignores it
[19:27] <asac> mbana: have gnome-support packag installed?
[19:29] <mbana> huh, is TB 3 in the official ubuntu repos?
[19:36] <micahg> mbana: not yet
[19:42] <mbana> freenode is acting up
[19:43] <mbana> asac: thanks
[19:43] <mbana> got it
[19:51] <BUGabundo> asac: micahg: I don't see to be able to put JAVA in firefox
[19:51] <BUGabundo> I think I have sun java plugin
[19:51] <BUGabundo> but its not working !
[19:51] <BUGabundo> ideas?
[19:52] <BUGabundo> its available on chromium
[20:14] <asac> BUGabundo: which ffox version? ... i think 3.6+ broke java ... check if 3.5 works oo
[20:14] <asac> b
[20:14] <BUGabundo> 3.7
[20:15] <asac> yeah. thats probably not working until sun has fixed their plugin
[20:15] <asac> check with [reed] ... he might know more about that
[20:15] <BUGabundo> thanks
[20:15] <[reed]> mmm?
[20:15]  * asac also wants to know the status
[20:15] <asac> [reed]: sun java plugin uses old plugin api ... which afaik isnt there in 3.6+
[20:16] <[reed]> it's there in 3.6
[20:16] <asac> at least they used oij etc.
[20:16] <[reed]> we put it back
[20:16] <asac> oh ... great!
[20:16] <[reed]> still gone in 3.7
[20:16] <asac> so openjdk will work ;)
[20:16] <asac> [reed]: great news.
[20:16] <asac> BUGabundo: so 3.6 will work ... 3.7 is broken ;)
[20:16] <[reed]> I thought Sun had already fixed it
[20:16] <BUGabundo> ehe
[20:16] <BUGabundo> seems it didn't
[20:16] <asac> i thought so too.... thats why i asked him to check with 3.5
[20:16] <BUGabundo> running up to date lucid
[20:16] <BUGabundo> ok
[20:17] <BUGabundo> ill test 3.5
[20:17] <[reed]> yeah
[20:17] <asac> BUGabundo: compare the version with whatever sun has released. maybe it wasnt updated yet.
[20:17] <[reed]> I know Sun has fixed it
[20:17] <[reed]> Sun JRE SE6 U10 or higher
[20:17] <[reed]> has it
[20:17] <BUGabundo> yes 3.5 shows jva
[20:17] <BUGabundo> Java(TM) Plug-in 1.6.0_16
[20:18] <asac> not sure what version that is though (in sun words)
[20:18] <BUGabundo> sun-java6-bin:  Installed: 6-16-1
[20:18] <BUGabundo> sun-java6-plugin:  Installed: 6-16-1
[20:20] <BUGabundo> asac: (firefox:27467): GLib-WARNING **: g_set_prgname() called multiple times
[20:20] <BUGabundo> are we gonna get reed of this ?
[20:21] <[reed]> "rid"
[20:21] <[reed]> not "reed"
[20:21] <BUGabundo> LOLOLOL
[20:21] <BUGabundo> pun intended :p
[20:21] <[reed]> I've never seen that error before
[20:21] <BUGabundo> are you highliting just the word, not the nick?
[20:21] <[reed]> I highlight lots of things
[20:22] <BUGabundo> [reed]: what's the reason for double click in awesome bar not work as it should
[20:22] <BUGabundo> aka select word ?
[20:22] <[reed]> some GNOME HIG issue, iirc
[20:22] <[reed]> there's a bug on it
[20:22] <BUGabundo> does work on Win
[20:23] <BUGabundo> and can be changed on about:condig
[20:23] <[reed]> yes, but something in the GNOME HIG disallows it
[20:23] <[reed]> or something
[20:23] <BUGabundo> which I always do
[20:23] <[reed]> what's the pref again?
[20:23] <BUGabundo> one click, all; double : word; triple: point
[20:23] <[reed]> no
[20:23] <[reed]> what's the pref name
[20:23] <BUGabundo> let me check
[20:24] <BUGabundo> browser.urlbar.doubleClickSelectsAll
[20:41] <[reed]> mozilla bug 190615 and friends
[20:54] <BUGabundo> fixed
[20:54] <BUGabundo> so what's the bug preventing it be default ?
[20:54] <BUGabundo> ehe
[20:54] <BUGabundo> Chromium has that bug LOLOLOLOL
[20:54] <BUGabundo> and I HATE it
[20:54] <BUGabundo> FF wins that fight
[21:08] <bdrung> asac: around?
[21:46] <mbana> i think threading is slightly broken.  it works just fine in TB 2.
[22:03] <micahg> mbana: can you be more specific, I notice a few differences myself
[22:05] <mbana> micahg: some threads aren't grouped properly.  i.e., spawns a new thread instead of putting it into the proper on
[22:05] <mbana> e
[22:05] <micahg> mbana: I'm seeing some of that too
[22:09] <micahg> asac: can I start taking TB3 bugs in LP?
[22:10] <BUGabundo> micahg: so much free time :DD
[22:10] <micahg> BUGabundo: not at all, but I'd rather not start e-mail threads for fixing bugs
[22:10] <BUGabundo> ?!
[22:10] <BUGabundo> ahh right
[22:11] <BUGabundo> rather have bugs in LP then via ml
[22:11] <BUGabundo> gotta
[22:24] <fta> http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/12/the-coolest-isp-in-the-world.ars
[22:25] <BUGabundo> err
[22:46] <mbana> how do i install the firefox that ships with ubuntu?
[22:46] <mbana> i uninstalled it after using chrome
[22:47] <BUGabundo> mbana: aptitude install firefox ?
[22:47] <BUGabundo> mbana: aptitude install firefox-gnomesupport or something
[22:47] <mbana> BUGabundo: i have a strong feeling that'll install the mozilla ppa one
[22:47] <BUGabundo> or just ubuntu-desktop ?
[22:47] <BUGabundo> ohhh
[22:47] <BUGabundo> then you have to FORCE it to use 3.5
[22:50] <mbana> ok how tho
[22:50] <mbana> everything is from Ubuntu Mozilla Team <ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com>
[22:50] <mbana> in package manager
[23:00] <micahg> mbana: install the version that ends in 0ubuntux
[23:05] <BUGabundo> mbana: ctrl+e and force the version you want
[23:48] <bdrung> ping asac
[23:49] <dtchen> mm fun, 3.5.6
[23:50] <BUGabundo> ehe
[23:51] <BUGabundo> 3.7~a1
[23:51] <micahg> asac: I have some questions about TB3 if you have time...