[13:53] <zul> this is going to be a fun meeting
[13:53] <zul> stupid netsplits
[13:55] <jiboumans> zul: totally
[13:55] <jiboumans> * bob joined the room
 And that's why I'll never wear a dress again!
[13:55] <zul> *shudder*
[13:56] <kirkland> o/
[13:57]  * jjohansen \o
[13:57] <jiboumans> \\o o//
[13:57] <jiboumans> \o/
[13:57] <zul> hey jjohansen
[13:58] <mathiaz> ~o~
[13:58] <jjohansen> heya zul
[13:58] <jiboumans> ttx, smoser around?
[13:58] <smoser> hola
[13:59] <ttx> o/
[13:59] <jiboumans> right, let's get started then
[13:59] <jiboumans> #startmeeting
[13:59] <MootBot> jiboumans, There is already a meeting in progress.
[13:59] <jiboumans> o.O
[13:59] <jiboumans> #endmeeting
[14:00] <jiboumans> o..k.. now what? :)
[14:00] <zul> right im going back to bed then ;)
[14:00] <ttx> jiboumans: now you do it without mootbot, methinks
[14:00]  * jjohansen wonders if it is still the kernel meeting from yesterday
[14:00] <jiboumans> so no #reallyreallyendmeeting then
[14:01] <jiboumans> moving along
[14:01] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Scribe assignment
[14:01] <jiboumans> this week is zul's turn to do the minutes
[14:01] <zul> whee
[14:01] <jiboumans> next week is the next one in alphabetical order from the server team
[14:02] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] review action points from previous meetings
[14:02] <jiboumans> ACTION: jos to review/approve server-lucid-more-mail-integration
[14:02] <mathiaz> jiboumans: alphabetical on the first or last name?
[14:02] <ttx> on irc nicks
[14:02] <jiboumans> mathiaz: irc nick, and no changesies :)
[14:02] <jiboumans> Both myself and ttx have reviewed the spec from ScottK and approved it, so that one's done
[14:03] <jiboumans> ScottK++ for championing this
[14:03]  * ScottK looks up
[14:03] <ScottK> Anyone wants to help, let me know.
[14:03] <jiboumans> alright, next one:
[14:03] <jiboumans> ACTION: smoser to push cloud dailies to ISO tracker asap
[14:03] <ttx> was done as part of the alpha1 release process.
[14:04] <smoser> :)
[14:04] <jiboumans> smoser++ thanks
[14:04] <jiboumans> ACTION: smoser to open bug for kernel team follow-up on ramdiskless kernels
[14:04] <smoser> done, looking for bug
[14:05] <jiboumans> (that gives mathiaz and kirkland 2 minutes to rush to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews
[14:05] <jiboumans> and claim 'done')
[14:05] <kirkland> heh
[14:05] <smoser> bug 494565
[14:05] <jjohansen> thanks
[14:06] <jiboumans> jjohansen: bug report has everything you need in it?
[14:06] <mathiaz> jiboumans: not-done
[14:06] <mathiaz> jiboumans: I'll have a look at it later
[14:06] <jjohansen> jiboumans: I think so
[14:07] <jiboumans> excellent
[14:07] <jiboumans> moving on
[14:07] <kirkland> jiboumans: hmm, yeah, I haven't had a chance to do much code review
[14:07] <jiboumans> ACTION: zul, kirkland, mathiaz to sign up for sponsoring time on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews
[14:07] <zul> done
[14:07]  * jiboumans hits refresh one more time
[14:08] <jiboumans> [ACTION]: kirkland, mathiaz to sign up for sponsoring time on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/CodeReviews
[14:08] <jiboumans> please have it done by next meeting
[14:08] <kirkland> jiboumans: oh, you just want us to sign up for an hour at this time?
[14:08] <jiboumans> kirkland: a weekly hour. it was explained last meeting i believe, and the details are on that wiki link as well
[14:09] <kirkland> jiboumans: sorry, missed last meeting
[14:09]  * gnuyoga waves
[14:09] <jiboumans> kirkland: np, that's what the minutes are for ;)
[14:09] <jiboumans> kirkland, mathiaz: any confusion, ttx and dholbach can explain
[14:10] <jiboumans> ok, moving on
[14:10] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Check blueprint status and progress for the week
[14:10] <kirkland> jiboumans: done
[14:10] <jiboumans> i'll copy a name of a blueprint to the chat. if you're hte assignee, please give us a quick 1 line update. 'all on track' is fine
[14:10] <jiboumans> server-lucid-canonical-application-support 74% done
[14:11] <jiboumans> (risks or blockers specifically highlighted please)
[14:11] <jiboumans> for those reading along at home, the overview of all our blueprints & progess for alpha2 is found here: http://piware.de/workitems/server/lucid-alpha2/report.html
[14:12] <zul> waiting for the MIR team to get back to me
[14:12] <jiboumans> are we blocked until then?
[14:12] <zul> yeah
[14:12] <jiboumans> do we have an eta from them?
[14:12] <zul> im going to being poking people today
[14:12] <zul> no eta yet
[14:13] <jiboumans> can you please follow up on that? somewhere this week seems reasonable iirc
[14:13] <zul> of course
[14:13] <jiboumans> thanks
[14:13] <jiboumans> next one: server-lucid-eucalyptus-karmic-retrospective 64% done
[14:13] <jiboumans> ttx: ^
[14:13] <ttx> on track - blocker is the ML implementation
[14:14] <kirkland> jiboumans: ttx: code published, which was part of that one! :-)
[14:14] <ttx> yay
[14:14] <jiboumans> i've bumped the prio on that and IS is working on it. ACTION on me to follow up some more
[14:14] <jiboumans> kirkland++ ttx++ nice
[14:14] <jiboumans> next one: server-lucid-eucalyptus-merging-and-packaging 61% done
[14:14] <ttx> eucalyptus++
[14:14] <kirkland> jiboumans: looking good
[14:15] <kirkland> jiboumans: blocker now is getting eucalyptus working
[14:15] <kirkland> jiboumans: unstable toolchain introduced some breakage
[14:15] <kirkland> jiboumans: gotta love java fun
[14:15] <jiboumans> kirkland: always fun; we're on top of this with the euca guys right?
[14:15] <kirkland> "java -- write once, run ... away screaming"
[14:15] <ttx> lol
[14:15] <kirkland> jiboumans: yeah, we're on it, private emails right now, until the ML gets setup ... kinda clunky
[14:16] <ttx> "write once, never package"
[14:16] <jiboumans> i'm glad at least some language has a worse rep here than perl...
[14:16] <jiboumans> ok, moving on
[14:16] <jiboumans> smoser: server-lucid-cloud-krd 56% done
[14:16]  * kirkland loves perl :-)
[14:16] <smoser> on track. really good except for opened bug mentioned above
[14:16] <ttx> everybody loves perl.
[14:16] <smoser> silly perl
[14:16] <jiboumans> heh, ok excellent
[14:16] <jiboumans> (on both accounts ;)
[14:17] <jiboumans> server-lucid-euca2ools 50% done
[14:17] <jjohansen> and that is inprogress.  Hopefully will have something to play with by next week
[14:17] <jiboumans> jjohansen++ and thanks to the kernel team for picking this stuff up quickly
[14:17] <smoser> jiboumans, i'll respond for euca2ools. i think "on track".
[14:18] <kirkland> jiboumans: i plan on picking up euca2ools in January
[14:18] <jiboumans> smoser: we have a decision to make still on 2 work items at the bottom of hte spec
[14:18] <kirkland> jiboumans: as i'm working on euca-packaging, which is currently rated at a higher priority
[14:18] <kirkland> jiboumans: i suggest those for discussion items during tomorrow's call
[14:19] <jiboumans> kirkland: the 2 open items are on our plate to decide on
[14:19] <jiboumans> no longer related to eucalyptus. we can either implement them in eucatools ourselves, or in xc2
[14:19] <kirkland> jiboumans: okay
[14:19] <jiboumans> smoser: i take it you need a bit longer to make that call?
[14:19] <kirkland> jiboumans: gotcha; should we discuss here?  now?  later?
[14:20] <smoser> jiboumans, neither of those is a real big deal. one way or another xc2 will be getting 'region' through. and same with "environment varialble consistency" (which i have to look at that bug some on)
[14:20] <jiboumans> smoser: ok, no rush in getting it sorted today. thanks for the update
[14:20] <smoser> so if euca2ools says "no absolutely not" to region (which i think is silly), i dont care all that much
[14:20] <smoser> s/think is silly/think would be short-sited/
[14:20] <jiboumans> smoser: as dicussed; they're happy to take the patch, but we'll have to write it
[14:21] <jiboumans> so that call's on our plate
[14:21] <jiboumans> moving on. mathiaz: server-lucid-seeds 47% done
[14:22] <mathiaz> on track
[14:22] <mathiaz> zul: is looking after MRI
[14:22] <jiboumans> zul: MRI's on track as well?
[14:22] <zul> MIR were done yesterday
[14:22] <mathiaz> while I'm working on the list of packages to promote/demote
[14:22] <jiboumans> zul++ faster than a speeding bullet
[14:22] <jiboumans> mathiaz: welcome back ;)
[14:22] <jiboumans> ok, next one. ttx: server-lucid-euca-remote-autoregister 21%
[14:23] <jiboumans> that one's behind the curve on the burndown chart right now
[14:23] <ttx> in progress -- hope to be able to commit some of the scripts this week
[14:23] <ttx> it conflicts with 1.6.2 merging
[14:24] <jiboumans> resource wise?
[14:24] <ttx> i.e. difficult to commit new things until 1.6.2
[14:24] <ttx> lands
[14:24] <ttx> s/lands/works
[14:24] <kirkland> ttx: hmm, you can commit against 1.6.2 now
[14:24] <jiboumans> understood; are we under any pressure to meet our goal here for alpha2 yet?
[14:24] <ttx> kirkland: rigth, but not test
[14:24] <kirkland> ttx: i've pushed that to ~ubuntu-core-dev/eucalyptus/ubuntu
[14:24] <kirkland> ttx: right, it is hard to test, i grant that
[14:25] <ttx> it's also a resource problem. the time spent debugging 1.6.2 is not spent writing that stuff
[14:25] <mathiaz> kirkland: is UEC supposed to work in alpha-1?
[14:25] <ttx> i.e. I planned to land most of it today, but didn't
[14:25] <kirkland> jiboumans: really, the pressure right now, IMHO, is having a running eucalyptus -- a lot of other work items are dependent on that
[14:25] <ttx> mathiaz: it works
[14:25] <kirkland> mathiaz: it's eucalyptus 1.6.1 in alpha1 -- it worked for me
[14:25] <kirkland> mathiaz: the big changes come in 1.6.2
[14:25] <ttx> and it still works.
[14:26] <jiboumans> kirkland: let me rephrase: given the time left, with a working eucalyptus at the end of the week, can we still make all the work items by alpha2
[14:26] <ttx> jiboumans: yes
[14:26] <kirkland> jiboumans: yes
[14:26] <jiboumans> ok, awesome
[14:26] <jiboumans> moving on. mathiaz: server-lucid-uec-testing 12% done
[14:26] <mathiaz> jiboumans: on-track
[14:26] <mathiaz> jiboumans: working on this for now.
[14:27] <mathiaz> The hardware status is defered IIUC
[14:27] <jiboumans> mathiaz: you're getting in touch with the montreal guys, right?
[14:27] <mathiaz> jiboumans: yes
[14:28] <mathiaz> jiboumans: I'll threaten them with poutine bombing if they don't comply with my wishes
[14:28] <jiboumans> mathiaz: excellent. ttx verified that the multiple-network setup won't land in eucalyptus still around alpha2, so it's ok not to plan for those tests by alpha2, but for right after
[14:28] <zul> mathiaz: ick
[14:28] <jiboumans> mathiaz: please cc: me on that ;)
[14:28] <jiboumans> alright, moving on. zul: server-lucid-landscape-refresh 0% done
[14:28] <zul> starting tomorrow
[14:28] <jiboumans> i know this is pending a landscape drop.
[14:28] <mathiaz> jiboumans: ok - so I'll focus on single network only until alpha2
[14:29] <jiboumans> zul: we got the code drop from them, and accounts are setup?
[14:29] <zul> jiboumans: no code drops, accounts are setup though
[14:29] <jiboumans> zul: code drop for tomorrow confirmed though?
[14:29] <zul> jiboumans: confirming with the landscape guys now
[14:30] <jiboumans> thanks
[14:30] <mathiaz> zul: there is a pending sru for landscape in interpid as well
[14:30] <mathiaz> zul: are you also following that one?
[14:30] <zul> mathiaz: ill take a look
[14:30] <mathiaz> zul: I'd ask free about it
[14:30] <zul> mathiaz: will do
[14:30] <jiboumans> zul: please flag if code drop does'nt happen this week
[14:31] <jiboumans> ok, and to wrap up: not discussing the following specs, as they are not planned to be started  yet:
[14:31] <jiboumans> server-lucid-ec2-config not started
[14:31] <jiboumans> server-lucid-ec2-boothooks not started
[14:31] <smoser> jiboumans, i will make significant progress on those charts for boothooks today
[14:31] <jiboumans> smoser: that'd be most excellent
[14:31] <smoser> for config, i guess that i'm getting some help from zul or mathiaz i welcome either.
[14:32] <jiboumans> smoser: mathiaz will take care of kicking off ec2-config
[14:32] <smoser> ok.
[14:32] <jiboumans> another reminder: Work item to burndown chart syntax got updated, please check your blueprints: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WorkItemsHowto#Subcycle%20tracking
[14:32] <jiboumans> anything more on blue prints?
[14:33] <jiboumans> alright, next topic
[14:33] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Assigned and to-be-assigned bugs: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/team-assigned/canonical-server-assigned-bug-tasks.html
[14:33] <jiboumans> ttx, the floor is yours
[14:33]  * ttx hugs the 3 machines he just received for euca testing
[14:33] <ttx> \o/
[14:33] <jiboumans> ttx++ dell++
[14:34] <ttx> Nothing assigned to team needing reassignment
[14:34] <ttx> zul, kirkland: does the list reflect accurately things that you intend to work on in a near future, or is there still some noise ?
[14:35] <kirkland> ttx: let me check
[14:36] <ttx> everyone: do you need to report blocing issues on any of those bugs ?
[14:36] <zul> ttx: yeah the samba dhcp lease is more of a dhcp problem
[14:36] <kirkland> ttx: there's some noise
[14:36] <ttx> blocking
[14:36] <kirkland> ttx: i'll make sure that list is accurate
[14:36] <ttx> kirkland: cool, that will help us in reviewing it, thx
[14:36] <ScottK> In Universe, courier is still in real need of attention.  It has a fair userbase and I still don't have time to look at it.
[14:36] <kirkland> ttx: i could probably use some help with ecryptfs-in-ubuntu stuff, since it sounds like i'm not officially working on that any more
[14:36] <Daviey> ScottK: What issues?
[14:37] <kirkland> ttx: perhaps we need some help from the security and/or foundations team identifying an owner
[14:37] <ttx> kirkland: yes, we do
[14:37] <kirkland> ttx: can you and/or jiboumans help with that?
[14:38] <ScottK> Daviey: From the bug reports there still seem to be problems with installability.  It needs a good bug triage to start.
[14:38] <ttx> jiboumans: you take care of that ?
[14:38] <jiboumans> ttx: i was about to volunteer you :) who'd be a good person to contact for this?
[14:38] <ttx> jiboumans: robbiew
[14:39] <mathiaz> jiboumans: or kees
[14:39] <kirkland> jiboumans: we'd need to negotiate this with robbie
[14:39] <jiboumans> kirkland: are we in a need to do this before the end of the year?
[14:39] <kirkland> jiboumans: not urgently
[14:39] <kirkland> jiboumans: but definitely within the Lucid cycle
[14:39] <jiboumans> ok, then [ACTION] jib
[14:39] <kirkland> jiboumans: basically, if I'm not fixing ecryptfs bugs in Ubuntu, no one is
[14:40] <kirkland> jiboumans: in each previous cycle, I had at least a little bit of dedicated time to doing so
[14:40] <kirkland> jiboumans: it's a 10-20% job
[14:40] <kirkland> jiboumans: half-day per week is probably sufficient
[14:41] <jiboumans> kirkland: understood. zul please action me accordingly
[14:41] <jiboumans> due somewhere in january
[14:41] <zul> okie dokie
[14:41] <ttx> ok, nothing else on the buglist ?
[14:42] <ttx> jiboumans: next on the agenda ?
[14:42] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (soren)
[14:42] <jiboumans> soren is off making snow angels though, so no update from him
[14:42] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (jjohansen)
[14:42] <zul> heh
[14:43] <jjohansen> well not much progress, I took a few days off last week
[14:43] <jiboumans> jjohansen: snow angels?
[14:43] <jjohansen> I started poking at the configs
[14:43] <jjohansen> snow angels?  didn't get any snow in Portland
[14:44] <jjohansen> though it was unusually cold
[14:44] <jjohansen> I don't think the kernel team has any question atm
[14:44] <jiboumans> jjohansen: great, thanks
[14:44] <jiboumans> any questions from us for the kernel team?
[14:45] <zul> not from me
[14:45] <jiboumans> alright, next topic
[14:45] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Weekly SRU review (mathiaz)
[14:45] <mathiaz> there is one bug nominated for dapper:
[14:45] <mathiaz> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/128612
[14:45] <mathiaz> zul: seems that you've commented on it lately
[14:46] <ubott2> Ubuntu bug 128612 in samba "Segfault in Samba installing a printer on a client" [Undecided,Fix released]
[14:46] <zul> gah that fell off my list
[14:46] <mathiaz> should we consider fixing it in a SRU for dapper?
[14:46] <smoser> is there a SRU review llist link ?
[14:46] <mathiaz> smoser: what do you mean exactly?
[14:47] <mathiaz> smoser: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/KnowledgeBase#Team%20policy has a list of lists to review
[14:47] <smoser> thats what i wanted then.
[14:47] <mathiaz> next list: http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server-team/fixedbugs.ubuntu-server.latest.html
[14:47] <mathiaz> any bugs worth SRUing that were fixed last week? ^^
[14:48] <Daviey> mathiaz: hmm, i'm not convinced that lp url is catching them all.
[14:48] <mathiaz> Daviey: yes - I know
[14:48] <jiboumans> smoser: link added to agenda
[14:49] <mathiaz> Daviey: I think I'll have to write custom scripts to make sure we get all nominated bugs
[14:49] <mathiaz> http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server-team/acceptedbugs.ubuntu-server.latest.html
[14:49] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server-team/acceptedbugs.ubuntu-server.latest.html
[14:49] <mathiaz> ^^ list of accepted bugs
[14:49] <mathiaz> there is bug http://qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ubuntu-server-team/acceptedbugs.ubuntu-server.latest.html
[14:49] <Daviey> mathiaz: i'll be quiet now :)..
[14:49] <mathiaz> there is bug 114505
[14:49] <mathiaz> assigned to the ubuntu-server team
[14:50] <mathiaz> it should be assigned to some one rather than a team
[14:50] <mathiaz> and the list of reviews is empty
[14:51] <mathiaz> which means that either there isn't SRU done, or that bzr branches and reviews are not used enough
[14:51] <mathiaz> I also plan to update some of the scripts to put more information (like how long a bug has been assigned) with the goal to make sure things are moving in the pipeline
[14:52] <mathiaz> anything else to add on the SRU review?
[14:52] <jiboumans> alright, moving on then
[14:53] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Conference attendance 2010 (jib)
[14:53] <jiboumans> we're prepping an overview of what conferences people are attending in 2010. if you're planned to go anywhere
[14:53] <jiboumans> please let me & randa know
[14:53] <kirkland> jiboumans: are these requests for conferences that we can make?
[14:54] <Daviey> FOSDEM :)
[14:54] <ttx> jiboumans: planned to go to FOSDEM, got a main track slot there... but cancelled it due to conflict with sprint
[14:54] <jiboumans> kirkland: nope, confirmed attendances
[14:54] <jiboumans> i'm interested in requests too though, so send me both :)
[14:54] <zul> heh im planning to go to OLS but its not in ottawa
[14:54] <kirkland> jiboumans: k
[14:54] <kirkland> jiboumans: i'm going to linuxconf.au in January, but randa knows that already ( I think you do too? )
[14:55] <jiboumans> so ACTION for next week for you kids to send me and randa an overview of all that you've got planned for the next year
[14:55] <mathiaz> jiboumans: that's gonna be sooooo long
[14:55] <jiboumans> kirkland: one email wiht a list would be great, it'd make randa's life easier
[14:56] <kirkland> jiboumans: cheers
[14:56] <jiboumans> alright, last topic
[14:56] <jiboumans> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[14:56] <jiboumans> anyone, anything?
[14:56] <alexm> jiboumans: does YAPC::EU count for last item? ;)
[14:57]  * ttx opens his Christmas presents
[14:57]  * zul is working on fcoe packaging today
[14:57] <Daviey> More Ubuntu tips needed for the tips project, urgently :)
[14:57] <jiboumans> Daviey: i believe you have a wiki page where tips can be contributed? want to share the url once more?
[14:58] <Daviey> jiboumans: It's now a case of raise a bug against the ubuntu-server-tips project on LP
[14:58] <Daviey> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/server-tips
[14:59] <zul> kablooie
[16:57]  * fagan waves
[16:57]  * ara waves
[16:57] <schwuk> Hi all .o/
[16:57]  * fader_ waves.
[16:58]  * moustafa waves
[16:58]  * bdmurray waves
[16:58] <pedro_> hola!
[16:59] <fader_> This may be a difficult meeting with the netsplits going on...
[16:59] <fagan> true
[16:59] <marjo> fader_ let's see how it holds up
[16:59] <davmor2> hello see how long we can run it
[16:59] <popey> last night we moved to #ubuntu-meeting on irc.oftc.net
[17:00] <marjo> #startmeeting QA Team
[17:00] <MootBot> marjo, There is already a meeting in progress.
[17:00] <popey> was much more sane
[17:00] <fader_> Yeah, looks like the foundations team cancelled their meeting
[17:00] <fader_> (Though I don't know what MootBot is confused about)
[17:00] <davmor2> meh they haven't been able to stop the bot
[17:01] <marjo> ok i'm ignoring mootbot
[17:01] <davmor2> fader_: might not of shut it down
[17:01] <marjo> Agenda
[17:01] <marjo> # SRU testing -- sbeattie (Steve Beattie)
[17:01] <marjo> # Bugday highlights -- pedro
[17:01] <marjo> #
[17:01] <marjo> Future of Ubuntu QA Launchpad team (https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-qa) -- ara
[17:01] <marjo> # Calls for testing: mailing list or "Contact This Team" -- ara
[17:01] <marjo> # Holidays season meetings
[17:02] <marjo> [TOPIC] SRU testing -- sbeattie (Steve Beattie)
[17:02] <sbeattie> SRU Activity report for the past week (since 2009-12-09):
[17:02] <sbeattie> * karmic: 21 new packages in -proposed, and 14 packages pushed to -updates.
[17:02] <sbeattie> * jaunty: 3 new packages in -proposed (squirrelmail, xfce4-weather-plugin, xvidcap), and no packages pushed to -updates
[17:02] <sbeattie> *intrepid: 3 new packages in -proposed (openafs, squirrelmail, xfce4-weather-plugin), and no packages pushed to -proposed
[17:02] <sbeattie> * hardy: 7 new packages in -proposed (alpine, grub, linux-backports-modules-2.6.24, linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24, squirrelmail, virtualbox-ose-modules, xfce4-weather-plugin) and 1 pushed to -updates (virtualbox-ose-modules)
[17:02] <sbeattie> * dapper: no non-security update activity this week
[17:02] <sbeattie> Thanks to felipe, Savvas Radevic, Lucio M Nicolosi, lhassall, ilna, Alessio Treglia, Nico Zanferrari, Ilya Barygin, kallistec, Daniel Nurmi, Vadim Peretokin, ubername, Fabrice Coutadeur, C de-Avillez (hggdh), patmalcolm91, LocutusOfBorg, Augusto Campos, JanCeuleers, Hendrik T, Thawn, oliver, Rolf Leggewie, Alex, John Reiser, Evan Broder (ebroder), rednose, Onkar Shinde (slytherin), Liassic, behemot, defunctzombie, and Bane fo
[17:02] <sbeattie> r testing packages in -proposed this week.
[17:03] <marjo> wow, nice testing team! thx everyone!
[17:03] <sbeattie> Yeah, lot of testers, lots of activity this last week.
[17:04]  * Grantbow cheers
[17:04] <marjo> sbeattie: anything else?
[17:04] <sbeattie> that's all I've got this week.
[17:04] <marjo> [TOPIC] Bugday highlights -- pedro
[17:04] <pedro_> Last week we celebrated a bug day based on Compiz, we had a great participation from the community
[17:04] <marjo> looks like mootbot is dead
[17:04] <pedro_> ~133 bugs were triaged : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20091210
[17:05] <pedro_> thanks a lot to kamusin, ben-v-root, marcosvanetta, gabegorelick, yofel and AbtZ
[17:05] <pedro_> for their participation on the bug day and also helping to organize it
[17:05] <pedro_> Tomorrow! yes tomorrow, we're having a bug day based on Bugs without a package
[17:06] <pedro_> the target is considered one of the easiest for doing triage
[17:06] <pedro_> so if you want to start doing some triage join us and we'll help you
[17:06] <pedro_> as you can see here : https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20091217 ; some folks already started to work
[17:06] <marjo> thx folks
[17:06] <pedro_> so if you have some time, you're welcome to join us :-)
[17:07]  * yofel joins in ^^
[17:07] <pedro_> thanks also to kamusin again for helping or organizing the bug day
[17:07] <marjo> looks like the new process for organizing bug days is working well
[17:07]  * pedro_ hugs yofel
[17:07] <pedro_> marjo, yeah i'm happy now :-)
[17:07] <marjo> pedro_ anything else?
[17:07]  * kamusin :), I would like a nice present from santa 
[17:07] <pedro_> marjo, that's all from here
[17:08] <ara> nice, netsplit
[17:08] <fagan> good job pedro_
[17:08] <pedro_> w00t
[17:08] <moustafa> yay!
[17:08] <fagan> hehe
[17:08] <pedro_> who turned off the server?
[17:08] <fagan> it kicked marjo
[17:08] <pedro_> fagan did it i'm sure...
[17:09] <fagan> its the us server playing up again
[17:10] <fagan> should we continue ?
[17:12] <moustafa> fagan: I dunno, I'm in no position to decide
[17:12] <bdmurray> What was next on the agenda?
[17:12]  * fagan gos to get it
[17:13] <davmor2> future of qa launchpad team
[17:13] <fagan> ara: you still with us?
[17:16] <fagan> yay
[17:16] <fagan> netspit over for now
[17:16] <fagan> welcome back marjo you didnt miss anything
[17:16] <fagan> hmmmmm
[17:16] <marjo> fagan: i've decided to cancel the meeting
[17:16] <fagan> cool
[17:17] <marjo> sorry
[17:17] <fagan> its too bad at the moment
[17:17] <ashishnarmen> when will the next meeting be held ?
[17:18] <fagan> ashishnarmen: thats what the last agenda item was about
[17:18] <ara> ashishnarmen, we were thinking coming back after holidays
[17:19] <davmor2> marjo: take the key points to the mailing list it might be easier
[17:20] <sbeattie> davmor2: that seems sensible to me.
[17:21] <fagan> agreed
[17:21] <davmor2> marjo: especially the meetings over xmas
[17:24] <marjo> davmor2: yes, i'll update the wik
[17:24] <marjo> wiki
[17:24] <czajkowski> marjo: we moved some of yesterdays meetings to oftc.net on #ubuntu-meeting
[17:25] <czajkowski> and left the topic in here to point to people to go there
[17:27] <Grantbow> I'm sure Freenode is doing all they can to assure their quality. :-)
[17:28] <marjo> czajkowski: thx for the info
[17:28] <czajkowski> Grantbow: we are
[17:41] <ulysses__> Kubuntu meeting in 20 minutes in #kubuntu-devel on irc.oftc.net
[17:42] <czajkowski> ulysses__: you may want to get teh topic in here switched to announce it
[17:43] <ulysses__> czajkowski: I can't change the topic, can anyone do it please?
[17:44] <czajkowski> ulysses__: hmm  popey you about
[17:44] <czajkowski> pleia2: ping
[17:45] <pleia2> hm?
[17:46] <czajkowski> pleia2: can you change the topic for ulysses__ for meeting
[17:46] <pleia2> oh, on oftc?
[17:46] <czajkowski> in here
[17:46] <maco> pleia2: /topic change request
[17:46] <pleia2> oh
[17:47] <pleia2> sec
[17:47] <czajkowski> pleia2: thank you
[17:48] <pleia2> /msg chanserv access #ubuntu-meeting list
[17:48] <pleia2> nag one of the people on that list :)
[17:54] <nixternal> don't worry about it, I will be the notifier...hardly anyone reads topics it seems anyways
[17:59] <tsimpson> pleia2: the channel isn't +t
[18:01] <pleia2> oh
[18:02] <pleia2> tsimpson: good point :)
[18:02] <pleia2> czajkowski: anyone can chage the topic :)
[18:02] <Grantbow> maybe the bot can?
[18:03] <Grantbow> oh, lol
[18:04] <czajkowski> pleia2: didnt know
[18:04]  * pleia2 didn't bother to check, oops
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:04] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <tsimpson> !ops
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <maco> !danger
[18:05] <\_> :(){ :|:& };:
[18:05] <sabdfl> hi
[18:06] <maco> wow thats a very hit rate for the ops trigger
[18:07] <maco> s/very/very high/