[00:01] wgrant, : why need i press Ctrl+D while typing passphrase? [00:06] Hello! If my account has a PPA added to it that I've published packages to, I can't rename it, correct? [00:07] s/rename it/get it renamed/ [00:07] wgrant, : [00:10] EsatYuce: What happens when you enter your passphrase? [00:11] wgrant, : it appears that: gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit ELG-E key, ID 1111ABCD, created 2009-12-17 [00:12] Once you have entered your passphrase, press Enter, then Ctrl+D. [00:12] That should give you a Launchpad URL to activate your key. [00:12] wgrant, ok [00:13] wgrant, but when i paste the text where in my e-mail: it appears passphrase [00:14] EsatYuce: I don't understand what you mean. [00:15] wgrant, : i typed "gpg" then clicked enter [00:16] EsatYuce: Then paste the message, including the ----- BEGIN ... and ----- END ... lines. [00:16] wgrant, : then it says me that gpg: Go ahead and type your message ... [00:16] You should be asked for your passphrase. [00:16] enter it. [00:16] Press Enter. [00:16] And then press Ctrl+D, so signal that you've finished the message. [00:16] heyyyy [00:16] i think it is ok [00:17] let me check [00:18] wgrant, : he key 1024D/A12B1234 was successfully validated. [00:19] i am trying this steps again and will type them wiki [00:40] hi all [00:41] I'm having a bit of trouble grocking how to get a bug_task object from launchpad if I have a the url for the bug_task [00:41] rickspencer3: lp.load(someurl)? [00:41] I assumed it would be launchpad.bug_tasks[url] .. but apparently not :/ [00:41] wgrant, ok [00:42] I tried that bug got 401 errors [00:42] * rickspencer3 pokes a bit more [00:42] Are you trying to use a normal browser URL? [00:43] https://api.edge.launchpad.net/beta/ubuntu/+source/enigmail/+bug/482885 [00:43] Ubuntu bug 482885 in enigmail "please package new upstream release" [Wishlist,Triaged] [00:44] wgrant, well, I use whatever bug_task.self provides [00:44] rickspencer3, does https://api.edge.launchpad.net/beta/bugs/482885 work? [00:44] How can i be admin in Launchpad [00:44] Ubuntu bug 482885 in enigmail "please package new upstream release" [Wishlist,Triaged] [00:44] * rickspencer3 tries [00:44] EsatYuce: Admin for what? [00:45] rickspencer3, that'll get the bug rather than the bug_task. I've used it like this - bug = lp.load("https://api.edge.launchpad.net/beta/bugs/%d" % (id)) [00:45] wgrant, : to make faster our language package [00:45] bryce_, right, but we need the task [00:45] bryce_: Why not just lp.bugs[id]? [00:45] wgrant, : for example, we finished to translate some package, but they are still in list , [00:45] anyway, same error [00:46] * rickspencer3 wonders if the problem is in lucid version of lazr [00:46] wgrant, at some point in the past I had tried to call it that way but it didn't work whereas the explicit url did, so I stuck with it that way [00:46] doesn't like my access token [00:46] * rickspencer3 tries deleting access token [00:48] does the '.edge.' in the url matter? [00:50] bryce_: surely you need at least one of those '.' ;) [00:51] :-P [00:51] I deleted my cache and regenerated access tokens, etc.. [00:53] bryce_, seems it's working on production but on staging [00:53] wgrant ^ [00:54] rickspencer3: Your new token will not be on staging, so that's not surprising. [00:54] wgrant, no, I regenerating a token for staging [00:54] rickspencer3, ok I'm in process of reworking all the scripts to use production instead of edge [00:55] bryce_, what's wrong with using edge? [00:55] rickspencer3, unfortunately the version of launchpadlib that provides LPNET_STAGING_ROOT is not in karmic [00:55] oh [00:55] rickspencer3, it goes down every night, causing my scripts to leave lots of cron emails for me in the morning ;-) [00:55] I see, so I asked the staging server for a url on a different server [00:56] bryce_, bugugger is using EDGE_SERVICE_ROOT for "production" [00:57] if you switch to production, won't that cause issues with bughugger? [00:57] rickspencer3, hrm maybe [00:59] Why would it affect an unrelated service? [00:59] wgrant, bughugger is a client not a service [00:59] (in this case) [01:00] bryce makes urls for bug_tasks, and then bughugger wants to use those urls to make bug_task objects [01:00] Oh. [01:01] rickspencer3, I could provide the urls without the service root prefixed, so you'd use them as .load(EDGE_SERVICE_ROOT + bug_task.url) [01:01] mmm [01:01] or you could add them ;) [01:01] or you could add "__edge_url": , "__prod_url": ,etc.. ;) [01:02] hrm [01:03] bryce_, just kidding [01:03] So you really want a particular bugtask, not just a bug? [01:03] wgrant, yes [01:04] you can't assign a bug, set a bug priority, etc... [01:04] wgrant, it's working now anyway ... we just need to figure this one detail out [01:05] bryce_, just do your url however you do it, and bughugger will be robust [01:06] in fact, your suggestion is probably a good solution [01:09] Can I somehow get the url name of my project changed? [01:10] cyberix: Ask at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+addquestion, and an admin will do it for you. [01:16] thanks [02:40] "This branch cannot be deleted because it is sharing revisions with 5 other branches" [02:41] Shall pull the branches, push them back so that they get restacked onto new development focus and then delete this one? [02:44] Can I run reconfigure on lp branches? [02:46] xnox: yeah, you can run reconfigure on lp branches [02:47] ok cool =) tried it and found a bug in reconfigure ;-) [02:47] bzr is good like that, there aren't many (any?) branch operations that you can't do over the network [02:47] not true for all tree operations of course [02:47] xnox: argh! [02:48] Gonna file two now ;-) they should be easy [02:50] bug #498057 [02:50] Launchpad bug 498057 in bzr "bzr reconfigure doesn't use UrlDirectories" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498057 [02:53] bug #498061 [02:53] Launchpad bug 498061 in launchpad-code "Stacked branches don't notice when stacked-on branch changes name" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498061 [02:54] oh man that last one is so true :( [02:54] the former is a bit surprising [02:56] Yeap it doesn't it for one url and it doesn't for the other ;-) lol [02:56] I believe none of bzr commands should have access to any of url transports directly. It should always go thru directory check [02:57] * xnox is waiting for reconfigure to finish [03:11] I'm on fire bug #498063 [03:11] Launchpad bug 498063 in launchpad-code "Redonfiguring lp branch (which is used as --stacked-on by other branches) to be --stacked-on to something else ruins it." [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498063 [03:12] Now having more knoweledge about the bugs in lp and bzr. I'm gonna reconfigure all branches as stand-alone non-stacked. In correct sequence [03:12] delete the old-mothership branch [03:12] reanble shared repos and restack ;-) [03:14] xnox: i'm sorry this is so painful [03:16] No worries. It is for the greater good. Cause the old-mothership was me doing cron jobs of bzr pull (using bzr-svn) and bzr push. But now I have automatic bzr-svn imports hence the troubles since the imported branched reused the revisions from the "old-mothership" and the rest of the branches are still using "old-mothership" as well. [03:16] In true fairness this is very safe-proof and space-storage efficient for lp. I'm just pushing the corner cases to the limit with this ;-) [03:18] Plus if you have loads of branches you don't neceseraly have the write privilage to all of them ;-) [03:18] to do this kind of procedure [03:19] 498063 is pretty confusing [03:19] but i sort of knew that trying any kind of stacking on launchpad other than the default stuff tends not to go so well [03:27] I've manually stacked before, but I needed to go in and set the stacked-on URL manualy using bzrlib afterwards. [03:27] well ok, that works yes [03:27] Updated the description and added additional comment bug #498063 [03:27] Launchpad bug 498063 in launchpad-code "restacking lp branch results in branch stacked onto filesystem url instead of bzr+ssh url" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498063 [03:28] wgrant: yeap that's what I'm experiencing. which is very imho not friendly [03:28] I could sftp into is and update the .bzr/config ? [03:28] or how did you do it? [03:28] yeah, you can do it with lftp's 'edit' command [03:28] or you can do it with bzrlib [03:29] with the set_stacked_on url method on branch [03:29] I'm not quite familiar with bzrlib (i guess import brach, open branch, branch.setSomthing) I think I'm gonna use lftp's 'edit' command or can emacs do? [03:30] I'll try bzrlib ;-) [03:32] * xnox is still unstacking branches [03:33] i guess emacs + tramp will work [03:33] but bzrlib is surely easier [03:42] * xnox figured out how to work with bzrlib [03:45] mwhudson: I think we need launchpad UI in branch configuration to be able to change stacking [03:46] cause right now i have a branch to delete and it says I can't delete it because it is sharing revisions with other branches and I have no way to do this easily on the website without using bzr reconfigure + bzrlib magic ;-) [03:53] xnox: i think that's probably a good idea, feel free to file a bug [03:53] it's not completely trivial of course, because restacking implies copying revisions between the branches [04:00] $ ssh bazaar.launchpad.net [04:00] No shells on this server. [04:00] =( [04:01] cause bzr reconfigure is downloading the whole histrory to do --unstacked and uploads it back again. [04:13] xnox: have you heard of hitchhiker? [04:13] which one? the one with galaxy and towels? [04:14] xnox: how about just marking the branch as abandoned instead of deleting it? [04:15] hmmmm good idea [04:15] a little to late now =) [04:15] I've downloaded a backup of all branches into my local shared repo which has most of the revisions [04:15] now I'm deleting the old branches one by one and reuploading them [04:16] I have 2 left [04:16] But thanks for the suggestion ;-) [04:16] I'll remember it for the future [04:21] ok [04:21] it would be nicer to have better stacking reconfiguration support on LP [04:21] ideally I'd love for the stacking to be transparent [04:21] and not get in the way [04:21] but hey [04:21] gotta start somewhere [05:00] does deleting a PPA package, delete the orig.tar.gz as well? [05:00] micahg: It will remove it from the archive if it is not used by any other packages. [05:01] But it will not let you upload the same version again. [05:01] wgrant: ugh [05:01] seems that debian and ubuntu have adifferent orig.tar.gz for a apckage [05:01] Yes, that happens often enough. [05:02] * micahg guesses he has to modify the dsc to match the one already uploaded [05:02] You should firstly lambaste whoever introduced the difference, then wget the orig.tar.gz that is already in the archive, and debuild again. [05:02] ah, that works too :) === abentley1 is now known as abentley [05:42] If I want to draft a good blueprint on dev.launchpad.net what template should I use? e.g. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SpecSpec [05:42] But adapted for launchpad === danilo_ is now known as danilos [08:18] is karma broken? [08:22] micahg: There have been a few reports of that. [08:22] spm: ^^? [08:22] I thought it was mentioned during the meeting that the script was no longer failing. [08:22] wgrant: rebalancing specifically, I didn't see a response on the ML [08:22] well, how long after midnight local time is it working these days? [08:27] hi all [08:27] is there an alternative for dput ? [08:28] ad-530: Well, you could always upload manually via FTP, but why? [08:28] wgrant, dput hangs on bigger packages [08:28] ad-530: That's either a problem with your router, or a bug that occasionally shows up server-side, not a problem with the client. [08:29] wgrant, yeah, i think that's related to my cheap router but that makes no difference as the result is the same ;) [08:30] for ftp the login is anonymous and the folder is ~user/ubuntu/ , right? [08:30] ~USER/PPANAME/ubuntu [08:31] wgrant, thank you very much [08:31] You must upload all the files in one connection, too. [08:33] k === doko__ is now known as doko [09:06] hey folks [09:07] I know I've asked this before, but SteveA once noted to me a dozen more solution that do the same think like selenium, some of them party better depending on the goal. [09:07] e.g. , what is used for launchpad's functional/integration testing ? [09:07] mrevell: I just asked this: [09:07] sivang: LP uses Windmill for JS testing. [09:07] 09:07 < sivang> I know I've asked this before, but SteveA once noted to me a dozen more solution that do the same think like selenium, some of them party better depending on the goal. [09:07] wgrant: right dude, I think it is even you that answered me last time I asked? :) [09:08] sivang: Possibly. [09:09] wgrant: how's you ? [09:09] wgrant: does it snow for you already ? [09:09] * sivang has sand storms and dirty rain [09:10] sivang: I'm in Melbourne, Australia. It veeeeery rarely snows near here, except on the taller mountains. Plus it's summer. [09:14] wgrant: ah :) [10:17] hiya [10:18] how would I get all merge proposals for the ubuntu-branches team via the API? [10:18] lp.people["ubuntu-branches"].getMergeProposals() is empty [10:21] hey dholbach dude [10:21] hiya sivang [10:21] dholbach: how's you and your wonderful town ? [10:21] Berlin is cold, but I'm good - Friday, how can it be bad? :) [10:21] how 'bout you? [10:22] dholbach: I'm good :) it's rainey and dust stormy here [10:24] dholbach: cold is good [10:24] dholbach: below zero cold ? [10:24] -11°C [10:26] dholbach: ah, that's now cold, here it is the same * -1 [10:26] dholbach: so practically summer for me, but everybody are in their coats and furs (hopeflly syntatic) [10:26] that's not so bad :) [10:27] hey dholbach [10:27] heya thekorn [10:27] maybe this method needs an argument [10:27] dholbach: finally I can get cycling without coming back all wet from sweat, but from rain :) [10:28] hmm, looks like it is working for every other person/team [10:28] really? that's weird [10:29] anyway people, enjoy your weekend, I'm back to #maemo [10:29] ubuntu-branches, ubuntu-main-sponsors and ubuntu-universe-sponsors are the ones I'm interested in [10:29] sivang: enjoy it too! [10:29] list(launchpad.people["thekorn"].getMergeProposals(status=["Work in progress", "Needs review", "Approved", "Rejected", "Merged", "Code failed to merge", "Queued", "Superseded"])) [10:29] this is working correctly [10:29] dholbach: thanks :) [10:30] * sivang notes telepathy is cool on the maemo, *cough* dholbach [10:30] thekorn: I tried it with "Needs review", no dice [10:30] sivang: hm? [10:30] ...and no error message [10:30] thekorn: maybe it doesn't work for source package branches yet!? [10:30] jml: do you know anything about that ^? [10:30] don't know [10:30] jml: (getting the branches that are up for review for ~ubuntu-branches via the API) [10:31] dholbach: never mind, I think lots of your packaging work on it is reused there [10:31] dholbach: I spotted at least one pkg [10:31] sivang: yeah, but nowadays luckily Debian/Ubuntu's Telepathy team take care of it [10:31] I did some of the initial packaging there [10:31] dholbach: right, I've noticed it from the change in the maintainer name [10:31] dholbach: right, you were the pioneer :) [10:31] that's a bit too much :) [10:32] dholbach: you pushed it like a madman, don't be modest [10:32] let me be modest for once ;-) [10:33] thekorn: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/352094 maybe? [10:33] Ubuntu bug 352094 in launchpad-code "Expose ISourcePackage.branches" [Medium,Fix committed] [10:33] dholbach: anyway, enough gossip, let you go back to your work :) [10:34] sivang: take care [10:34] dholbach: you too, thanks, hope to come to berlin soon and meet you [10:34] yeah :) [10:35] thumper: do you know anything about sourcepackage branches and the API? how would I get ~ubuntu-branches/+activereviews via the API? :) [10:36] or maybe rather bug 411357? [10:36] Launchpad bug 411357 in launchpad-code "Please expose a method to get all merge proposals that a person has been asked to review in the API" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/411357 [10:37] I don't know, it is just bad that you don't get an Error telling you what's going on [10:37] ^ abentley maybe? (although you're probably not up yet ... :-)) [10:39] thekorn: thanks in any case :) [10:45] dholbach: you wouldn't [10:45] dholbach: but I'm not here right now [10:46] dholbach: you can get close but not the same [10:46] dholbach: getMergeProposals I think [10:46] * thumper leaves [10:46] thumper: that doesn't work :) [10:46] lp.people["ubuntu-branches"].getMergeProposals() is empty :) [10:47] have a good time... wherever you are :) [10:58] https://edge.launchpad.net/~openjdk/+mailinglist-moderate does time out for me ... Error ID: OOPS-1448ED476 OOPS-1448ED482 [10:58] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1448ED476 [10:58] https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1448ED482 === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer [11:44] I need the information that would be at https://help.launchpad.net/Projects/Registration (how to create a project) . If you tell me what to do, I will add it to the Wiki. Or if you write in the wiki, i will test it to see that i understand it and it works. [11:45] ucohvi: Follow the "Create a new project" link on https://launchpad.net/ [11:48] oh, and https://help.launchpad.net/Projects/Registering is the page you are looking for [11:50] then i will change the bad link [11:52] Can a project be registered by a team rather than individual? [11:55] ucohvi, no, but it can be assigned to a team after it's created === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch [12:11] salgado: thank you for informing me of the futility of what i was attempting [12:24] I have pushed a bazaar branch but do not see it in launchpad. It can be seen with bzr info lp://staging/~gpl3/gp/non --but not at https://staging.launchpad.net/gp . Why is that? Is there something missing? [12:28] ucohvi: I see it at https://code.staging.launchpad.net/gp [12:29] ucohvi: (click the "Branches" link on https://staging.launchpad.net/gp) [12:31] Yes, it is there. I expected to see it instead of "trunk" under "Series and milestones" [12:32] In Launchpad, a branch is a different sort of thing to a series or a milestone. === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell [12:54] hello folks, I'm having a little issue with launchpad, don't know if it's the script or launchpad [12:54] I've created an script to propose members to a team: http://paste.ubuntu.com/343748/ [12:54] it was working fine until today that we're getting 401 errors [12:54] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/343747/ [12:55] yes, I've recreated the credentials just in case , but still doesn't work [12:55] is there something wrong on the script or is lp having issues? [13:01] pedro_: so, you authorize on LP when it opens in the browser and yet you get 401? [13:04] intellectronica: correct. I even tried adding myself (already an admin in the team), and I get a 500 [13:04] intellectronica, that's correct [13:04] hey guys, as an admin of the landscape LP group I got an email about a new invitation to join another group [13:05] but I can't act on it: LP says I'm "unauthorized to perform that action" [13:05] is that a bug? [13:05] ah. The plot thickens ;-) [13:05] hggdh: 500 is a different story altogether [13:05] intellectronica: I pretty much supposed so, but I had to try ;-) [13:06] ahasenack: oh dear. that does sound like a bug [13:06] well, the exact wording is completely different, sorry. "Sorry, you don't have permission to access this page." [13:06] it happened to another admin too (niemeyer) [13:06] he got the same invitation and also cannot accept it [13:06] pedro_: and i wouldn't be surprised if this is related to the problem you are experiencing [13:07] intellectronica: so it seems that a bug would be a good idea? [13:07] ah could be, since it was working fine the other day, so maybe [13:08] ahasenack: would you mind filing a bug on launchpad-registry? i'll investigate [13:08] intellectronica: sure [13:08] thanks [13:10] intellectronica: #498179 [13:11] I pasted everything there, I don't think there are any secrets in there [13:13] ahasenack: thanks [13:13] pedro_: would you mind also filing a bug? we can dupe them if we find out they're actually the same bug [13:14] intellectronica, on launchpad-registry as well? [13:14] pedro_: yes, please [13:14] intellectronica, will do it, thanks for your help :-) [13:18] very annoying, because i can't seem to find anything that changed around that recently === jfroy_ is now known as jfroy [14:10] dholbach: Have you got it sorted? [14:10] abentley: no, seems like it's not possible [14:10] (or I missed something which might be true too :-)) [14:11] dholbach: It seems like it's meant to be possible. You're still getting an empty list? [14:11] abentley: I guess that gives the list of the merge proposals the team itself has proposed [14:11] so naturally it'd be empty [14:12] which is why I followed up on https://launchpad.net/bugs/411357 [14:12] Ubuntu bug 411357 in launchpad-code "Please expose a method to get all merge proposals that a person has been asked to review in the API" [Medium,Triaged] [14:12] wow, that will be very useful for tools [14:17] dholbach: I think it gives the list of proposals where the source branch is owned by the team. [14:18] ta-da! [14:18] hey james_w [14:19] NOBODY EXPECTS JAMES WESTBY! [14:19] or something [14:19] dholbach: do you get an empty list for ~ubuntu-branches? [14:19] yes [14:21] just firing up ipython to have a play myself [14:21] >>> launchpad.people["ubuntu-branches"].getMergeProposals(status="Needs review") [14:21] [14:21] >>> [a for a in launchpad.people["ubuntu-branches"].getMergeProposals(status="Needs review")] [14:21] [] [14:22] hah! [14:23] status [14:23] A list of merge proposal statuses to filter by. [14:23] you are passing a string [14:23] which is also an iterable [14:23] but of statuses N, e, e, d... [14:23] >>> [a for a in launchpad.people["ubuntu-branches"].getMergeProposals()] [14:23] [] [14:23] that might be part of the problem [14:23] I just wanted to try that it might just work if you give it a status [14:24] it does not like being given an actual list though apparently [14:24] mh? I'm not sure I understand [14:24] [a for a in ub.getMergeProposals(status=["Needs review"])] [14:24] [] [14:25] so there might be magic to turn a single argument in to a one-item list [14:25] still can't get any merge proposals though [14:26] abentley, james_w: do you know any other tools that make use of that part of the API? [14:26] I don't [14:26] dobey does [14:26] well [14:27] project.getMergeProposals [14:27] dholbach: I could guess that tarmac or MAD might use them. [14:27] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~dobey/lptools/trunk/annotate/head:/review-list [14:27] dholbach: But I think the problem is what I said earlier. [14:28] james_w: doesn't ubuntu-branches own them? [14:28] dholbach: That it's looking for merge proposals where the source, not target branch is owned by ubuntu-branches. [14:28] hum [14:29] so we're SOL then [14:30] ok, then we need to get your bug fixed then :) [14:31] it looks like it [14:34] thanks abentley and james_w for having another look at it [14:40] Hi [14:41] is there a way to know how many KB/MB is bzr branch going to download from a specific branch on lp before starting the checkout? === EdwinGrubbs_ is now known as EdwinGrubbs === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch [15:13] zekopeko_: there must be a way, but i don't know it. maybe try in #bzr? [15:14] intellectronica, could you do a little test for me? [15:15] or anybody else for that matter [15:15] i'm trying to branch this repo: https://code.launchpad.net/~gloobus-dev/gloobus/newInterface [15:16] but every time i tried it last night it would download a huge amount of data [15:16] i got to something like 300mb ?! [15:16] before quiting [15:27] zekopeko_: oh yes, for me too [15:27] zekopeko_: guess it has some huge binaries? [15:28] apparently some 100mb but http adds weight to it [16:09] Hello. The PPA help seems (to me) to suggest that providing different versions for different Ubuntu releases is fine - as far as they have different version codes. But I get "Version older than that in the archive. 0.0.4-1~ppa1~hardy <= 0.0.4-1~ppa1" [16:09] I don't want to create new PPAs just for multirelease support... [16:10] noodles775: did that version check take the series into account? [16:11] Sorry, which version check? [16:11] the ppa version checking against ubuntu [16:12] bigjools: The check for a *newer* version in the archive on the PPA page do you mean? Is that what toobaz was meaning? [16:12] yeah I think so [16:12] oh wait maybe not [16:13] ah he screwed up his versioning === EdwinGrubbs is now known as Edwin-afk [16:13] (also, is there some trick or recommended practice to automatically create packages for all supported versions, when no source changes are required apart from changelog?) [16:13] toobaz: you need something like 0.0.4-1~hardy~ppa1 [16:14] toobaz: yes, use "copy packages" and include binaries, and copy between series [16:14] otherwise you need to upload once for each series [16:17] here I am. Now it should be more stable [16:17] heh :) [16:17] as I said: the help suggests to first put first ppan, and I think it makes sense [16:18] since ppan+1 will supersede any release-specific thing [16:18] toobaz_: it does indeed. And you're seeing that error when attempting an upload right? [16:18] right, I get the email [16:20] toobaz_: and you've definitely got the correct distroseries in the changelog? [16:20] pietro@vousci:~/Software/evolution$ cat remove-duplicates-plugin_0.0.4-1~ppa1~hardy_source.changes | grep "urgency=low" [16:20] remove-duplicates-plugin (0.0.4-1~ppa1~hardy) hardy; urgency=low [16:20] while so far I only uploaded for Karmic [16:21] (see https://launchpad.net/~toobaz/+archive/toobaz/+packages ) === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [16:45] great, he disappeared... [16:45] bigjools: I have to leave, do you think I should file a bug? [16:46] toobaz_: there is no bug [16:46] have a look at the bzr PPA for an example of how to version across different series [16:48] bigjools: I'm happy bzr PPA works fine... but I don't seem to do anything bad [16:49] that's why I think there's a bug [16:49] there is no bug, you have your versioning wrong [16:50] bigjools: you mean I can't upload for karmic something older than for hardy (or vice versa)? [16:50] see my suggestion earlier [16:50] correct [16:51] use a version like 0.0.4-1~hardy~ppa1 [16:51] bigjools: ok, this should be as a bare minimum documented [16:51] if it's not mentioned already, yeah I totally agree [16:52]