| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| * bizkut is away (i am away now) | 11:50 | |
| === bizkut is now known as bizkut-offline | ||
| === bizkut-offline is now known as bizkut | ||
| fta | asac, took 11h, but it built! did you try it yet? | 13:13 |
|---|---|---|
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| asac | bug 456659 | 15:16 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 456659 in linux-fsl-imx51 "suspend/resume failure on imx51" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/456659 | 15:16 |
| persia | Ugh. | 15:18 |
| asac | bug 458501 | 15:19 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 458501 in gnome-screensaver "[armel] screensaver hangs on unlock, eats cpu" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/458501 | 15:19 |
| asac | bug 494831 | 15:19 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 494831 in linux-mvl-dove "Alignment trap/Unhandled fault errors on boot" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/494831 | 15:19 |
| asac | bug 458537 | 15:19 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 458537 in linux-fsl-imx51 "hibernate does not work" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/458537 | 15:19 |
| persia | Is hibernate supposed to work? | 15:22 |
| asac | why not? | 15:23 |
| asac | at least it hsouldnt break stuff ;) | 15:23 |
| plars | it seemed that the kernel config option was not enabled for hibernate in either case | 15:23 |
| asac | hmm | 15:23 |
| persia | My understanding was that hibernate wasn't a well exercised use case for arm linux. | 15:23 |
| persia | I agree it shouldn't break stuff, but I'm not sure it's supposed to work. | 15:24 |
| persia | Because suspend tends to be deep enough that one doesn't need hibernate. | 15:24 |
| plars | persia: could be that it was excluded on purpose, but I'd like someone who knows that for certain to say whether or not that's the case | 15:24 |
| asac | yeah | 15:24 |
| asac | plars: but the UI still suggests hibernate? | 15:24 |
| asac | we should at least fix that | 15:24 |
| plars | asac: yes | 15:24 |
| persia | More generally, we should make the UI check to see if the system supports stuff before offering options. | 15:25 |
| persia | That's not an architecture-specific problem. | 15:25 |
| asac | http://piware.de/workitems/mobile/lucid-alpha2/report.html ;) | 15:26 |
| asac | we are below ;) | 15:26 |
| asac | plars: can you file that against gnome-power-manager too? | 15:26 |
| asac | e.g. UI option etc. | 15:26 |
| plars | persia: #CONFIG_HIBERNATION is not set, CONFIG_ARCH_HIBERNATION_POSSIBLE=y | 15:26 |
| asac | persia: right | 15:26 |
| persia | plars: Right. | 15:27 |
| persia | So, someone with more ARM linux kernel experience reading backscroll should comment and then maybe we'll have a clue :) | 15:27 |
| plars | asac: ^^ I wonder if it's seeing something turned on by hibernation_possible, could still be just kernel? | 15:27 |
| asac | bug 494667 | 15:27 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 494667 in squashfs-tools "[armel] non-ISO-C misaligned pointer punning causes slowness and SIGILLs" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/494667 | 15:27 |
| persia | I think the UI just isn't checking the system capabilities. | 15:27 |
| asac | plars: what "hiberation_possible" flag are you referrig to? | 15:30 |
| plars | asac: was a kernel config setting that is turned on | 15:30 |
| plars | and nothing regarding hibernation even appears to be present in the config for imx51 | 15:30 |
| plars | the options I pasted above were from the current dove build | 15:31 |
| asac | plars: but we see the UI option everywhere? | 15:31 |
| asac | or just on dove? | 15:31 |
| plars | asac: see it in both places | 15:32 |
| asac | kk | 15:32 |
| asac | so its ui i would sassume | 15:32 |
| asac | add gnome-power-manager to the bug too then | 15:32 |
| persia | Well, it's a few different bugs. | 15:32 |
| plars | asac: ok | 15:32 |
| asac | plars: do we have booting dove images? | 15:32 |
| plars | asac: yes :) | 15:32 |
| asac | good ;) | 15:32 |
| persia | Thank herb for that. | 15:33 |
| plars | very good | 15:33 |
| plars | so far, latest imx51 image seems to be working quite well with sata | 16:22 |
| plars | I haven't finished installing yet, but usually by this point it would be spewing errors | 16:23 |
| asac | great | 16:24 |
| asac | is it much faster? | 16:24 |
| plars | asac: hard to say at this point, the install bar isn't a great indicator | 16:29 |
| asac | let me fix the bug 488267 | 16:58 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 488267 in ffmpeg "ffmpeg should be built with -marm for lucid on armel" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/488267 | 16:58 |
| plars | asac: install still takes about 45m or so | 17:00 |
| asac | ok | 17:00 |
| ScottK | amarok is currently failing to build on armel due to libnjb-dev: Depends: libnjb5 (= 2.2.5-4.2ubuntu3) but it is not going to be installed | 17:57 |
| ScottK | I looked at that package is built on armel, so it's, I guess, not installable due to a lower level reason. | 17:58 |
| ScottK | The build log is not helpful: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amarok/2:2.2.1.90-0ubuntu1/+build/1399779/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-armel.amarok_2:2.2.1.90-0ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 17:58 |
| ScottK | I was wondering if someone with hardware could try and figure out why libnjb5 is not installable? | 17:58 |
| ScottK | ogra: ^^^? | 18:01 |
| asac | ScottK: i would think that njb5 produces binary all packages | 18:09 |
| asac | and the arch packages are not yet built | 18:09 |
| asac | or had a delay when the amarok was build | 18:09 |
| ScottK | asac: No. It's been built for a couple of releases now. | 18:10 |
| asac | let me check | 18:10 |
| asac | hmm | 18:10 |
| asac | letme try to install | 18:10 |
| ScottK | Thanks. | 18:10 |
| asac | just installs ;) | 18:11 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/343788/ | 18:11 |
| asac | hmm | 18:11 |
| asac | let me do build-dep | 18:11 |
| asac | also works | 18:12 |
| asac | didnt run it | 18:12 |
| asac | but it suggesgts a solution for me | 18:12 |
| asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/343790/ | 18:12 |
| * ScottK looks | 18:12 | |
| asac | ScottK: did that happen more than once? maybe retry? | 18:13 |
| ScottK | OK. Retried. | 18:13 |
| asac | kk | 18:13 |
| asac | let me know | 18:13 |
| ScottK | Will do | 18:13 |
| ScottK | asac: I guess shit happens. It worked. | 18:23 |
| ScottK | Thanks for checking. | 18:23 |
| ScottK | So now, I think, kdepim and amarok are in a race to see which will be the last package that needs to get built for us to have Kubuntu/Kubuntu Netbook ISOs on armel. | 18:24 |
| asac | ScottK: are you producing such isos already? | 18:26 |
| ScottK | Not for armel because I didn't get stuff to build. | 18:26 |
| asac | ScottK: right. i think you should produce .img files though | 18:26 |
| asac | there is no CD etc. for arm hardware usually | 18:27 |
| asac | so something that can be dd'ed to a SD or usb stick would be great | 18:27 |
| ScottK | We've just been using usb-creator-kde | 18:27 |
| asac | let me know when you have a first iso ... i can check that then ;) | 18:27 |
| ScottK | OK. | 18:27 |
| asac | if it runs etc. | 18:27 |
| ScottK | Great. You saw our Karmic pictures, right? | 18:28 |
| asac | ScottK: i saw your presentation at UDS | 18:29 |
| ScottK | Right. | 18:29 |
| asac | have the feeling it will be great for arm | 18:29 |
| asac | just not so sure yet about performance ... but we will see ;) | 18:29 |
| ScottK | Peformance is just a matter of time. | 18:29 |
| asac | :O | 18:30 |
| ojn | I'm glad to say that karmic seems to hold up nicely on a dual A9 system here so far. :) | 20:34 |
| === jmc93739653 is now known as jmc93739653_ | ||
| === jmc93739653_ is now known as jmc93739653 | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| plars | ojn: cool, one of your new toys? :) | 22:43 |
| plars | ojn: any smp issues? I don't hear from a lot of people doing smp | 22:44 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| === jmc93739653 is now known as jmc93739653_ | ||
| === jmc93739653_ is now known as jmc93739653 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!