[00:00] <malev> Hi, what to do when a las reporter from a bug was 6 month ago?
[00:04] <persia> malev: Try to replicate it.
[00:05] <malev> persia, oks! I'm playing with the hugday :D
[00:05] <persia> malev: Basically, a bug is valid until either proven solved or expected solved because it affects obsolete software and is hard to test.
[00:06] <persia> For something obvious to test like Fn+F5 on some specific hardware, it's safe to leave valid until you get someone to show it working with that hardware (or nobody has the hardware)
[00:06] <malev> excelent! yes I've found a lot of bugs from obsolete soft :D
[00:07] <malev> oks, I'm gonna leave it as valid.
[00:07] <persia> malev: Something I used to do when finding bugs like that was swing by #ubuntu and ask if anyone had the hardware.
[00:07] <persia> More people there, so a better chance of getting someone who can check if it's still valid.
[00:07] <malev> persia, nice idea
[00:17] <malev> Question: For example https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/366478  they use 9.04 how can i do to check if the bug exists? I don't use this hard anymore. But there are a lot of people claiming that the had the problem too.
[00:17] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 366478 in ubuntu "Alcor Micro Corp. Multimedia Card Reader don't work in Ubuntu 9.04/9.10 (058f:6362 Device offlined) " [Undecided,Confirmed]
[00:17] <malev> what can I do?
[00:20] <mrand> malev: typically if it is something that I can't reproduce, I will (1) try to see if there are duplicate bugs already filed and/or do a quick google search with "9.10 OR karmic" attached to it to see if there are any more recent reports of it not working (or it being fixed).   (2)  if none of those turn up anything, add a comment to the bug requesting if they can reproduce the issue on 9.10 and then mark it incomplete [incomplete becaus
[00:21] <malev> mrand, excelent! I'm going for it
[03:37] <liquid> hi, I was trying to test out a branch for gnome-shell, and was getting stuck on some of libgail-dev 's dependencys
[03:38] <liquid> i guess libgail-dev depends on libgail18.... and not libgail18...ubuntu1 which is in the repo
[03:39] <liquid> is there a way to get libgail-dev to point to the libgail18..ubuntu1 instead so i can get it installed?
[03:41] <liquid> here's the bash out put. http://pastebin.com/d1200a27a
[03:42] <liquid> sorry if this is the wrong spot to ask :p
[03:49] <liquid> any ideas? http://pastebin.com/d1200a27a
[05:59] <persia> liquid: Did you ever get an answer?
[05:59] <liquid> persia: nope
[05:59] <persia> OK.  Issue is that you're using lucid on non-i386 and have to wait for some builds.
[06:00] <liquid> persia: just wanna make sure its gets fixed :p, x64*
[06:01] <liquid> persia: thanks :D
[06:02] <liquid> persia: is there currently a bug in launchpad i may be able to track?
[06:02] <persia> No.
[06:03] <persia> look at the source package page for gtk+2.0 in launchpad, and the per-architecture build records.
[06:05] <liquid> well, i guess i wait it out. I apreciate the response.
[06:22] <nigel_nb> hey everyone
[07:00] <nigel_nb> anyone's got java workin?
[07:00] <nigel_nb> need a favor with reproducing a bug
[07:09] <liquid> persia: if your still around? is it possible to fake/edit a dependancy?
[07:09] <persia> liquid: Yes, but you don't want to do that.
[07:11] <liquid> anywhere i might be able to find out?
[07:12] <liquid> how to try such a manuver?
[07:12] <liquid> google failed me
[07:13] <liquid> just messing around not to worried :p
[07:17] <liquid> maybe a file i can edit?
[07:17] <liquid> *test system*
[07:26] <liquid> is the only way to do it by getting source code and recompiling it or something?
[07:28] <liquid> persia: *places hand on forhead, why did I even try*
[07:31] <liquid> correction *facepalm*, there's got to be a way, like a pointer or something?
[07:32] <liquid> fine, i'll go :p
[12:36] <hggdh> pedro_: I am getting a 401 when I try to propose the mentees -- http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/343747/
[12:37] <pedro_> hggdh, wait a second let me try the same here
[12:45] <pedro_> hggdh, yes getting the same here, weird since i tested the same a couple of days ago and it worked fine
[12:45] <pedro_> i'm trying to add propose another user there now
[12:56] <pedro_> hggdh, I'm asking on #launchpad, it's a bit weird since we're admins of the team we shouldn't get that 401
[12:56] <pedro_> i've recreated the credentials but still doesn't work
[12:56]  * pedro_ kicks lp
[12:59] <hggdh> heh. I did the same. I even went and delete *all* OAUTH tokens I could find, deleted the cache, and tried both edge and taging roots
[13:05] <pedro_> i've created a test account 'pedrotestlp'
[13:10] <hggdh> pedro_: I am on my way to my customer, will be back in 30m
[13:10] <pedro_> hggdh, drive safe, see you later :-)
[13:11] <hggdh> walk safe, actually ;-)
[13:11] <hggdh> see ya
[13:11] <pedro_> heh :-)
[14:16] <hggdh> pedro_: how did it go? A bug was opened?
[14:19] <pedro_> hggdh, yes, bug 498181
[14:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 498181 in launchpad-registry "cannot propose a member to a team trough launchpadlib" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498181
[14:20] <hggdh> pedro_: thank you, I am subscribing to it
[14:21] <pedro_> hggdh, cool!, they are requesting some tests, i'm going to perform those now, could you do the same later?
[14:22] <pedro_> well, getting the same after removing cache/credentials
[14:24] <hggdh> pedro_: actually I had already done that this morning (am updating the bug)
[14:25] <pedro_> great, i've already commented there
[14:27] <hggdh> darn, I was given a *real* slow wifi AP :-(
[14:34] <zzsedenyi> hello! Anybody live there?
[14:36] <zzsedenyi> If yes, please help me... I've a small error message only after I installed wubi.  I have got this message after wubi 9.10 reboots my computer: cannot find grldr in all devices
[14:40] <zzsedenyi> i have read all relevant messages on the support forum, but no solution found...
[14:42] <hggdh> zzsedenyi: have you opened a bug on it?
[14:45] <zzsedenyi> no, coz i found lot of messages about this error on ubuntuforum.org without any classifiable  message...
[14:46] <hggdh> zzsedenyi: well, then, you might start by giving us details -- like, say, the URL for the forum post (but I still think a bug will be necessary)
[14:47] <hggdh> or the error message you get (exact wording, please)
[18:24] <dutchie> what is the best way to push a bug upstream to debian?
[18:25] <micahg> dutchie: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Debian/Bugs?action=show&redirect=Bugs%2FUpstream%2FDebian
[18:25] <dutchie> so it doesn't upset them that it's run on an Ubuntu system?
[18:32] <Linux4Family> I installed the modem, but after I installed a strange sound comes from speakers, so what is this problem resolved
[18:33] <Linux4Family> are there any body to help me
[18:33] <Linux4Family> hello
[18:33] <Linux4Family> are there any body
[18:33] <micahg> Linux4Family: please try #ubuntu for support
[19:59] <qense> micahg: Did you adapt bug 367827 because it's wrong to open something with x-www-browser?
[19:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 367827 in thunderbird "Thunderbird is using x-www-browser to open a link in a browser" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/367827
[20:07] <qense> in generally: is using x-www-browser a bad thing, something worth filing a bug for against the bad application?
[20:55] <micahg> qense: according to asac, yes
[21:09] <komputes> Is there a tag for "repackage with debhelper to get trigger support" bugs?
[22:08] <yofel> can someone set bug 303587 to triaged/medium please? Thx.
[22:08] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 303587 in maxima "Error in CONDITIONS::CLCS-UNIVERSAL-ERROR-HANDLER [or a callee]: Caught fatal error [memory may be damaged] " [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/303587
[23:11] <awardle> I'm not sure if bug 4498291 is a duplicate of bug 478653. They have similar error messages, however one says ERROR - READY_WITH_NETWORK_WITH_METAQ while the other says ERROR - READY_WITH_NETWORK
[23:11] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 478653 in ubuntuone-client "BadTransition: SYS_OAUTH_ERROR can't be handled" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/478653
[23:40] <Jordan_U> How can I help move things foreward with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/497326 ? Because of this bug grub-reboot in karmic is completely broken ( will never work properly in any configuration ) and dangerous ( has already caused at least one person to lose access to a remote server ).
[23:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 497326 in grub2 "grub-reboot does not restore previous default after reboot" [Undecided,New]
[23:57] <mrand> Jordan_U: Thank you very much for pushing a patch upstream.  You might include the above mentioned side effects of the bug in the description... for those unfamiliar with parts of grub (including myself), it might help them to understand.
[23:59] <Jordan_U> mrand: I explained the problem more @ http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/grub-devel/2009-12/msg00276.html , should I just link to that ?