[20:39] <mwhudson> so
[20:39] <mwhudson> anyone else here today? :)
[20:54] <lifeless> no
[20:55] <lifeless> I is on leuvh
[22:09] <jml> good morning
[22:09] <jml> mwhudson, I am here
[22:11] <mwhudson> jml: good morning
[22:11] <mwhudson> i am about to be not here for an early lunch (and another visit to the new house)
[22:12] <jml> mwhudson, ok.
[22:13] <jml> mwhudson, maybe we should have a call when you get back?
[22:13] <mwhudson> jml: that would be good, eys
[22:23] <wgrant> mwhudson: Why did I just get a code import email with 'None' as the subject?
[22:26] <poolie> hi all
[22:30] <elmo> mwhudson: so, umm
[22:32] <elmo> why do we think this is the problem again?
[22:32] <elmo> oh, right, never mind
[22:32] <elmo> in any event, the fix is to simply remove the check for x-original-to
[22:32] <elmo> and use to/cc
[22:34] <elmo> at least AFAICS
[22:35] <elmo> i can go to the trouble of adding an X-Launchpad-To header if you like, but AFAICS the end result is the same
[22:35] <elmo> with the exception, I guess of Bcc-ing, but I'm not sure we want to support that
[22:43] <elmo> I guess we do
[22:43] <elmo> mwhudson: in the meantime, I'm going to cowboy http://paste.ubuntu.com/344005/ so I don't have to fuck with launchpad.net's email at 11pm on a Sunday night
[22:44] <wgrant> Isn't using anything other than the envelope recipient wrong?
[22:44] <elmo> you can't see the envelope recipient unless the receiving MTA copies it to another header for you
[22:44] <elmo> and the only disadvantage of using non-envelope is that you lose Bcc
[22:45] <elmo> I agree in the long term, I should fix the MTA to copy the envelope to into another header and revert back to that
[22:45] <elmo> I just don't want to do it tonight
[22:45] <wgrant> Right.
[22:53] <elmo> gaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
[22:54] <elmo> except of course spam's badly formed to: lines causes launchpad to lose it's TINY MIND
[22:54] <wgrant> Hahaha.
[22:54] <wgrant> Awesome.
[22:59] <jml> heh heh