| micahg | should I file a bug about karma not being updated? | 00:24 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | micahg: Bug 493349 | 00:25 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 493349 in launchpad "Karma not updating" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/493349 | 00:25 |
| wgrant | Hm, closed. Odd. | 00:25 |
| micahg | wgrant: yeah, I thought this started after the bug was filed | 00:26 |
| wgrant | I suggest filing a new one. | 00:26 |
| micahg | in LP itself? | 00:27 |
| wgrant | Looks like it broke, worked for a day or two, then broke again. | 00:27 |
| wgrant | launchpad-registry | 00:27 |
| micahg | ok, will do a little later | 00:27 |
| micahg | thanks | 00:27 |
| micahg | is launchpad now automatically adding itself to upstream bugzilla bugs? | 00:39 |
| sinzui | wgrant: micahg: Something is not running. Lots of cron scripts have not run in 2+ days | 00:48 |
| sinzui | No karma updated until they run | 00:49 |
| micahg | sinzui: I filed bug 498652 | 00:49 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 498652 in launchpad-registry "karma is not updating daily" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498652 | 00:49 |
| sinzui | We get daily reports. I am still waiting for a LOSA to investigate | 00:50 |
| micahg | which module handles the distro source package search by binary package? | 00:53 |
| sinzui | something is soyuz, possibly in lp/soyuz/browser/distribution. The search is for DistrioSeriesPackageCache I think | 00:55 |
| micahg | I was just wondering where to file the bug, sorry :) | 00:56 |
| wgrant | sinzui: But I thought I saw in the production meeting that stuff was no longer failing. | 01:05 |
| wgrant | sinzui: So Registry owns source packages, but not binary packages? | 01:06 |
| sinzui | wgrant: correct. Soyuz make the binary | 01:36 |
| sinzui | wgrant: The production script failure was not seen until Firday | 01:36 |
| sinzui | or firday | 01:36 |
| sinzui | The message I am getting says nothing is running. There is not failure. So either something is blocking them from starting or are not scheduled to run | 01:37 |
| wgrant | Ew. | 01:42 |
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| lifeless | wgrant: around? | 05:46 |
| lifeless | wgrant: nvm | 05:49 |
| wgrant | lifeless: I am. | 05:52 |
| wgrant | Fighting with intricacies of Soyuz domination, but around. | 05:52 |
| lifeless | /+mailinglists had gone AWOL. I had forgotten autoapproval. | 05:53 |
| wgrant | Ah, right. | 05:54 |
| lifeless | the dev wiki still mentions it, for confusion win | 05:56 |
| jml | lifeless, have you changed the wiki page? | 06:08 |
| === nigel_nb_ is now known as nigel_nb | ||
| lifeless | jml: no, I don't know what the replacement content should be | 06:26 |
| lifeless | jml: what are you up to this lovely weekend? | 06:33 |
| nomnex | help with a GPG command switch. I want to sign the Ubuntu code of conduct. I have 2 KEYS. the command: gpg --clearsign UbuntuCodeofConduct-1.1.txt select my default key, I need the other key. What's the switch? | 07:20 |
| wgrant | nomnex: Try '-u KEYID' | 07:22 |
| nomnex | wgrant: gpg -u keyid --clearsing... like this? | 07:22 |
| wgrant | nomnex: That should work, yes. | 07:23 |
| nomnex | wgrant: try that now, thanks | 07:23 |
| balau | I am debianizing an upstream package (that is not mine) and I want to put it into my PPA. What do I need to put (in debian/control) into Maintainer and XSBC-Original-Maintainer fields? The Ubuntu guide says to put a MOTU address and my address, but I'm not sure because MOTU are not involved and the upstream maintainer is not referenced | 11:14 |
| wgrant | balau: The original maintainer (you) is the same as the current maintainer. | 11:16 |
| wgrant | So you should put yourself in the Maintainer field, and not have an Original-Maintainer field at all. | 11:16 |
| AnAnt | hello, what's the bzr format supported in LP ? | 11:16 |
| AnAnt | is 2a supported ? | 11:17 |
| wgrant | AnAnt: LP supports all stable formats. | 11:17 |
| wgrant | 2a is of course supported. | 11:17 |
| balau | wgrant, so the upstream developer isn't a debian maintainer... well it makes sense, I didn't think about it that way. lintian warns that the Maintainer field is not "ubuntu", but I think I can ignore it. Thanks! | 11:20 |
| AnAnt | thanks | 11:20 |
| === AnMaster_ is now known as AnMaster | ||
| === leoquant is now known as Hans | ||
| === Hans is now known as Guest39290 | ||
| === Guest39290 is now known as hansbrinker | ||
| === hansbrinker is now known as leoquant | ||
| === Guest92635 is now known as nhandler | ||
| ChrisMorgan | *sigh* Firefox crashed again, again just after opening a Launchpad bug... | 17:21 |
| ChrisMorgan | I think that there's /something/ Launchpad's doing that sometimes Firefox doesn't like. | 17:21 |
| ChrisMorgan | Also I think the AJAXy stuff has been done a bit patchily in places. Last time Firefox died (blue screen that time, cause unknown), I lost my bug report that I'd typed in due to the AJAXy stuff not being done with history control. | 17:23 |
| ChrisMorgan | When Firefox sessions are restored, text in textboxes is saved for systems like Drupal pages: but it can't be restored to a Launchpad thing because the details textarea isn't there at or after page load, instead it's just the few word description thing and you've got to start again :-( | 17:24 |
| ChrisMorgan | It'd be really good if you'd implement AJAX history control, it'd make a number of things work better. | 17:24 |
| ChrisMorgan | Also things like the edit status AJAXy thing just don't work ideally, as you have to edit status and then add a comment, and it goes in two or three or four comment blocks or subscription mail messages - OR, go manually to ./+editstatus and then you can do them all at once... not sure how that'd be best fixed. | 17:26 |
| ChrisMorgan | However, since Firefox's crashed, I'll take this opportunity to put my computer away rather than finding and reporting the issue in Launchpad... it'd probably crash Firefox again anyway ;-) | 17:27 |
| === ChrisMorgan is now known as ChrisMorgan|Away | ||
| AnAnt | something is wrong with bugs.launchpad.net | 17:59 |
| AnAnt | I keep getting errors when replying bugs via email | 18:05 |
| akgraner | Good morning :-) all | 18:09 |
| AnAnt | Hello | 18:09 |
| akgraner | I am working on Ubuntu Weekly News Bug stats | 18:09 |
| akgraner | and I guess there was code push last week that changed the little block where you all report the stats | 18:10 |
| akgraner | now I need to know to find all bugs ever reported now? | 18:10 |
| akgraner | any suggestions | 18:10 |
| akgraner | also need to know total unassigned bugs | 18:14 |
| akgraner | please advise :-) Thank you in advance.. | 18:15 |
| === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| crimsun | could someone look at OOPS-1450CEMAIL946, please? | 20:31 |
| ubottu | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1450CEMAIL946 | 20:31 |
| james_w | crimsun: "No handler registered for 'launchpad@mail.canonical.com'" | 21:04 |
| elmo | hmm | 21:04 |
| elmo | that may be my fault | 21:04 |
| elmo | or not | 21:12 |
| pmjdebruijn | hi | 21:15 |
| pmjdebruijn | I uploaded a rather large set of sources yesterday | 21:15 |
| pmjdebruijn | however, I still haven't recieved a mail, the sources were accepted OR rejected | 21:16 |
| mwhudson | pmjdebruijn: if they weren't signed properly sadly there's no way to know who to tell who to complain to | 21:17 |
| pmjdebruijn | huh? | 21:19 |
| pmjdebruijn | if they get submitted to my ppa the complaint goes to my ppa, right? | 21:19 |
| lifeless | OOPS-1450CEMAIL1156 | 21:23 |
| ubottu | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1450CEMAIL1156 | 21:23 |
| pmjdebruijn | mwhudson: how can I verify the signature? | 21:23 |
| mwhudson | pmjdebruijn: i'm not really sure to be honest | 21:24 |
| pmjdebruijn | I did this once before, but i forgot the command | 21:24 |
| mwhudson | pmjdebruijn: gpg --verify maybe? | 21:24 |
| pmjdebruijn | doh | 21:24 |
| pmjdebruijn | I was looking for dpkg-... or deb... commands | 21:25 |
| lifeless | elmo: I see that too, for a regular new bug-via-mail. | 21:25 |
| pmjdebruijn | mwhudson: I think the signature should be oka | 21:25 |
| pmjdebruijn | okey | 21:25 |
| elmo | lifeless: I'd like to blame myself, but i don't think I can | 21:26 |
| elmo | lifeless: as in, my changes seem unrelated | 21:26 |
| lifeless | elmo: I can eyeball them, if that would help. | 21:26 |
| elmo | but if anyone who knows the mail system at all (not me) wants to help me I'd be happy to be proved wrong | 21:26 |
| lifeless | (if you're talking about lp config changes) | 21:27 |
| elmo | nah, I'm talking about mail.c.c migrating to new hardware | 21:27 |
| elmo | but mail is coming into the new box, and I can see LP sucking it out just like it did before | 21:27 |
| lifeless | yeah, its reading it | 21:28 |
| geser | pmjdebruijn: does the LP know that the key you signed it with is yours? | 21:28 |
| james_w | what does the redirect from nnnn@bugs.launchpad.net to launchpad@mail.canonical.com? | 21:28 |
| lifeless | elmo: but its not understanding it | 21:29 |
| mwhudson | elmo: in the oops report, the sent mail has X-Original-To: launchpad@mail.canonical.com | 21:30 |
| elmo | mwhudson: so? | 21:30 |
| mwhudson | elmo: could that have changed with the recent changes? | 21:31 |
| elmo | nope | 21:31 |
| mwhudson | elmo: launchpad seems to read that header to work out what to do with the mail | 21:31 |
| elmo | blink | 21:31 |
| elmo | SRSLY? | 21:31 |
| lifeless | elmo: yeah | 21:31 |
| elmo | AAAAAAAA | 21:31 |
| lifeless | ipv12 ? | 21:31 |
| elmo | ipvfail | 21:31 |
| elmo | wait, *seriously*? | 21:32 |
| elmo | that's so freaking broken, it's not even funny | 21:32 |
| elmo | it only ever worked by complete luck | 21:32 |
| mwhudson | before my time by about 45 internet years | 21:32 |
| lifeless | we could deploy lamson these days :P | 21:32 |
| * lifeless stops trolling, for a bit. | 21:32 | |
| mwhudson | http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~launchpad-pqm/launchpad/devel/annotate/head%3A/lib/canonical/launchpad/mail/incoming.py#L267 | 21:33 |
| elmo | fine, I'll disable the stupid process mail script till I can figure out what to do with it | 21:33 |
| lifeless | elmo: you might like to file a bug for a better process too | 21:35 |
| lifeless | elmo: if its something simple we could even monkey patch it. | 21:35 |
| lifeless | by we I mean 'mwhudson'. | 21:35 |
| elmo | fuck | 21:36 |
| mwhudson | elmo: i'm happy to make code changes you want, but what i know about email at this level can be written on the back of a postage stamp and shoved up a gnat's arse, as the saying goes | 21:36 |
| elmo | well, I mean, I have to fix this at the MTA level, fundamentally | 21:38 |
| elmo | any code change will be pointing it to a new X- header | 21:38 |
| elmo | which honestly, I ought to be able to manage | 21:38 |
| mwhudson | ok, i can review and land it then :) | 21:38 |
| wgrant | mwhudson: Could you please approve https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~wgrant/multidistrotools/trunk for me, if you're not busy averting disaster? | 21:46 |
| mwhudson | wgrant: done | 21:47 |
| wgrant | mwhudson: Thanks. | 21:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!