| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| BUGabundo | olá | 15:09 |
|---|---|---|
| fta | lo | 15:09 |
| fta | BUGabundo, defrag my *s | 15:09 |
| fta | :( | 15:09 |
| BUGabundo | still running ? | 15:10 |
| fta | BUGabundo, http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=8530654&postcount=99 | 15:10 |
| BUGabundo | fta: tip: lsof :D | 15:12 |
| fta | what for? | 15:12 |
| BUGabundo | to know what the program is picking up | 15:13 |
| BUGabundo | fta: do you know N2N ? | 15:13 |
| BUGabundo | I fall in love with it last night | 15:13 |
| fta | i know lsof pretty well, i don't understand why it should help me here | 15:14 |
| fta | no idea what N2N is | 15:14 |
| BUGabundo | you would know where pydefrag was moving your files | 15:14 |
| BUGabundo | or better, WHICH | 15:14 |
| BUGabundo | n2n is another subject | 15:14 |
| BUGabundo | p2p network layer VPN | 15:14 |
| fta | i know that, i even read the sources since | 15:14 |
| BUGabundo | fta: n2n or lsof? | 15:15 |
| BUGabundo | two subjects, pleanty of cofusion :D | 15:15 |
| fta | it's useless, it's just doing copies as i said yesterday, to by trying to unfrag some files, it frags the spaces around, leading to an even worse situation | 15:16 |
| BUGabundo | ahahaha | 15:16 |
| BUGabundo | it does not know where continues free space is | 15:16 |
| fta | no, it just knows how many parts a given file has, and tries to do better by copying it | 15:17 |
| BUGabundo | fta: would you mind installing n2n and do me a portscan on my interface? | 15:17 |
| fta | which becomes impossible once the free space is heavily fragmented | 15:17 |
| BUGabundo | better method: move them to external disc, move back in | 15:18 |
| BUGabundo | WIN | 15:18 |
| fta | that's what i'm doing right now, but i have too many data, not enough free space | 15:18 |
| BUGabundo | buy a new 2TB disk | 15:19 |
| BUGabundo | that's what I do, when I go bellow 80% free spac | 15:19 |
| BUGabundo | got a 1.5 T a few months, gonna get a new 2T early next month | 15:19 |
| fta | too expensive, i bought a new 1TB recently, but i left it at work :( | 15:19 |
| BUGabundo | I think I have 500G around but its giving me trouble starting up | 15:20 |
| BUGabundo | so I can't trust it | 15:20 |
| BUGabundo | 2T expensive? | 15:20 |
| BUGabundo | 100€ | 15:20 |
| BUGabundo | 1,5T 80€ | 15:20 |
| BUGabundo | 1T 50€ | 15:20 |
| fta | but 1T, 2T, 10T, not much of a difference for me, once full, i end up fighting with the last 5G left :( | 15:20 |
| BUGabundo | buy a new one before thar | 15:21 |
| BUGabundo | or use dedup | 15:21 |
| BUGabundo | or dump old unneaded stuff | 15:21 |
| fta | i'm dumping my chroots, should free me a disk | 15:22 |
| fta | i need to check if i won't trash bzr branches that are not on lp | 15:23 |
| BUGabundo | eheh | 15:24 |
| BUGabundo | backup those | 15:24 |
| BUGabundo | LOL | 15:24 |
| fta | where? i don't have enough free space | 15:24 |
| BUGabundo | I was jk fta | 15:27 |
| fta | lots of scripts in there too | 15:28 |
| fta | repack-from-debian, hmm | 15:28 |
| BUGabundo | time to do a spring cleaning | 15:29 |
| BUGabundo | fslint and kleaner are great tools for that | 15:29 |
| fta | don't know those. i often use baobab | 15:30 |
| BUGabundo | baahhh | 15:31 |
| BUGabundo | that's just gui to help find trash | 15:31 |
| BUGabundo | want to *really* clean stuff | 15:31 |
| BUGabundo | try those | 15:31 |
| fta | yep | 15:31 |
| BUGabundo | obviuosly IO heavy | 15:31 |
| BUGabundo | my 1,5T backup disk takes like 4h to complete kleaner | 15:31 |
| fta | BUGabundo, did you see my dent about the ubuntuforums? | 15:44 |
| fta | can you reproduce | 15:44 |
| fta | ? | 15:44 |
| BUGabundo | yes | 15:45 |
| BUGabundo | haven't tried it yet | 15:45 |
| micahg | fta: I wanted to ask you about the failure on ff37 | 15:47 |
| fta | ? | 15:48 |
| micahg | fta: the patch that failed is in a block that checks for MOZ_UPDATER, which should be false since we use --disable-updater | 15:49 |
| micahg | so the patch seems useless | 15:49 |
| fta | which patch? | 15:50 |
| micahg | ubuntu_no_updates | 15:50 |
| fta | we often try to do clean patches, even for stuff we don't use | 15:50 |
| fta | oh, ubuntu_* so it's not something we plan to upstream | 15:50 |
| micahg | fta: patch: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.7.head/annotate/head%3A/debian/patches/ubuntu_no_app_updates.patch | 15:52 |
| micahg | fta: code: line 400: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/annotate/fd1c53ab97d9/browser/components/preferences/advanced.js | 15:53 |
| micahg | line 401 actually | 15:53 |
| fta | it was needed at some point | 15:54 |
| fta | the ifdef is more recent than the patch | 15:55 |
| fta | should be safe to drop it, but it's not my patch, asac should confirm | 15:55 |
| micahg | asac: ^^^^^ | 15:56 |
| WHK | hola | 17:50 |
| WHK | alguien habla español? | 17:50 |
| BUGabundo | n | 17:56 |
| BUGabundo | so pt | 17:56 |
| WHK | ? | 18:02 |
| === BUGabundo1 is now known as BUGabundo | ||
| fta | micahg, did you get emails from my bot in the last 2 days? | 22:02 |
| micahg | fta: yes | 22:02 |
| fta | hm | 22:02 |
| micahg | fta: why? | 22:02 |
| fta | oh, it was hidden, sorry | 22:03 |
| micahg | fta: can you respin prism tomorrow? | 22:03 |
| fta | i patched the bot to be able to do multiple channels for chromium, but i thought i broke something in the process, apparently i didn't | 22:03 |
| BUGabundo | fta: I wish that too :( | 22:04 |
| fta | micahg, why? a respin with no change at all? | 22:04 |
| fta | BUGabundo, ? | 22:04 |
| BUGabundo | PPA bisec | 22:04 |
| micahg | fta: there was a version conflict when I fixed the bustage | 22:04 |
| BUGabundo | or better , a way to choose packges | 22:04 |
| micahg | apparently, my version in bzr was less than the bots | 22:05 |
| fta | BUGabundo, it was a subliminal call for volunteers ;) | 22:05 |
| BUGabundo | eheh | 22:05 |
| fta | should be trivial for pythoneers knowing the lp api | 22:06 |
| BUGabundo | but do PPA now let you access older debs? | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | like you can do in archive, if you have several releases | 22:08 |
| fta | micahg, shouldn't be a problem for the bot | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | and just add /RELEASE in front of the install command ? | 22:08 |
| fta | BUGabundo, yes, something like 30 days | 22:08 |
| BUGabundo | oh nice!!! | 22:09 |
| BUGabundo | is there a CLI command for it? | 22:09 |
| BUGabundo | cause downgrading NM sucks | 22:09 |
| fta | no | 22:09 |
| fta | that what i'm asking in the dent, cli or gui, i don't mind | 22:09 |
| fta | +'s | 22:09 |
| micahg | fta: you fwd'd me the email: prism_1.0b2+svn20091215r57886-0ubuntu1~umd1.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 1.0b2+svn20091215r57886-0ubuntu1~umd1 <= 1.0b2+svn20091215r57886-0ubuntu2~umd1 | 22:10 |
| * micahg forgot, do I have to bump the version in bzr? | 22:11 | |
| fta | let me check what the bot said about that | 22:11 |
| fta | damn, i dropped that email | 22:13 |
| fta | compare 1.0~b2+svn20090813r49078-0ubuntu1 (karmic) and 1.0b2+svn20091203r57206-0ubuntu1 | 22:17 |
| fta | micahg, it's 1.0~b2 vs 1.0b2 | 22:17 |
| fta | 1.0~b2 << 1.0b2 | 22:17 |
| fta | so either you go back to 1.0b2 or you change ~ with + | 22:17 |
| fta | the mozclient conf should be updated too | 22:18 |
| fta | micahg, oh, a good opportunity for you to something new, move from /usr/share/mozilla-devscripts/prism.mk to in package debian/mozclient like the other packages (ff, xul, tb) | 22:20 |
| fta | +try | 22:20 |
| micahg | fta: it should be 1.0~b2 to be consistent with the rest of the packages we do | 22:23 |
| fta | too late | 22:24 |
| micahg | I guess I have to modify the DEBIAN_VERSION in /debian/rules | 22:24 |
| micahg | fta: we can just delete the new one and upload the older one once I fix the rules script | 22:24 |
| fta | it's either + or use an epoch (even uglier) | 22:24 |
| fta | imho, it should be +, as prism upstream bump just before release, unlike moz | 22:25 |
| micahg | fta: should I file a bug against prism for the mozclient change? | 22:25 |
| fta | not needed, if you plan to do it yourself ;) | 22:26 |
| fta | it's not very difficult, you have plenty of examples available | 22:26 |
| micahg | fta: ok, so we can do 1.0+b2 and then 1.0.0 for release | 22:27 |
| fta | yes | 22:29 |
| fta | bzr log -p -r 386 in xul 1.9.1 | 22:29 |
| * micahg has a lot to do :) | 22:30 | |
| fta | as you want, the only alternative to fix the problem is to update m-d | 22:32 |
| fta | and do backports :( | 22:33 |
| micahg | fta: which problem? | 22:34 |
| fta | the version, the tarballs are created by mozclient in m-d | 22:35 |
| micahg | oh | 22:35 |
| micahg | I see, so I need to fix the version in prism to match the tarball | 22:35 |
| micahg | and eventually fix m-dev so it doesn't happen anymore | 22:36 |
| fta | yes | 22:36 |
| micahg | ok | 22:36 |
| fta | so workaround, go back to 1.0b2, and fix, update mozclient | 22:36 |
| micahg | ok, I'll fix the version right now, maybe mozclient later in the week | 22:37 |
| micahg | fta: it seems like the changelog wasn't the issue, but that fact that it was ubuntu1 vs ubuntu2 | 22:40 |
| micahg | for some reason the bot had ubuntu2 as the last upload for prism | 22:42 |
| micahg | so, since there was no new upstream but bzr changes, it respun with the version I had in bzr which was ubuntu1 | 22:43 |
| fta | hmm, always u2~umd1.. https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=prism&field.status_filter=&field.series_filter=lucid | 22:48 |
| micahg | fta: idk why | 22:52 |
| micahg | fta: is there a way for you to push up to u3 until the next upstream release? | 22:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!