=== mac_v is now known as kvc === kvc is now known as vish [10:39] http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/the_best_and_worst_identities_of_2009.php === vish is now known as mac_v [17:53] Equiet: hi.. pinged mpt regarding your mockups... he said he'll follow up :) [17:53] mac_v: Thank you. What exactly means follow up? [17:54] Equiet: comment about it or request changes ... [18:00] Have you tried Gnome Shell? [18:00] yup... [18:01] And what do you think? [18:01] as of now , i would say isnt very ideal [18:36] sadly dropping the concept is not seen as an option [18:38] Why to drop it? [18:41] Equiet: since it is not clearly better, it should be tested with actual users to see how they fare (in comparison with the current setup). [18:41] Equiet: if it doesn't show to be clearly better, it should be dropped [18:42] Equiet: however, my worry is that that option will not be considered [18:46] I agree, that it's not very intuitive, so it shouldn't be enabled by default, but I like it. With a good shortcut and little changes it could be nice work. [18:46] Equiet: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-shell-list/2009-December/msg00124.html [18:49] At least, it is something, that is not stolen from other OSs. [18:49] Equiet: "intuitive" is a highly problematic term, anyway. what is and isn't intuitive depends on past experience, making it somewhat subjective. some claim: "the only intuitive interface is the nipple", but not even that is entirely accurate, as even there learning is involved [18:50] "unique" does not trump "good" [18:51] But it's still better than Vista glossy buttons and OS X's Application menu in top bar. [18:52] User has to find out, that for running apps he needs to click Activities, so it's not intuitive for me. [18:53] Equiet: better by what measure? [18:56] Well, you're right. Better is another problematic term. [18:56] Brb. === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v [20:11] lmao > http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/tech/Called-Racist-HP-Says-Thanks-for-the-Feedback-79822477.html