| === tuantub_ is now known as tuantub | ||
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| crimsun | siretart: hi, do you know of any reason not to sync openal-soft_1:1.10.622-1 from Debian testing? | 04:49 |
|---|---|---|
| === nxvl_ is now known as nxvl | ||
| === dyfet` is now known as dyfet | ||
| suji11 | hi, already i upload a package here http://revu.ubuntuwire.com for review with the version 1.3.6, now i have to upload the package with Upgrading it to latest upstream version(1.3.8), how to do it? | 05:45 |
| ScottK | suji11: Just upload it, it will replace the previous one | 05:48 |
| suji11 | ScottK: using this command dput revu package_version_source.changes | 05:52 |
| ScottK | Yes | 05:52 |
| suji11 | ScottK: my packae is here, http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7253 but it shows some warnings. what to do to resolve that? | 06:05 |
| RAOF | suji11: Which warning in particular? They seem fairly self-explanatory to me, but then I've got plenty of experience. | 06:15 |
| suji11 | RAOF: The Maintainer field is invalid. It has to contain an @ubuntu.com address (usually the Ubuntu MOTU Team's). The packager can leave his/her name as XSBC-Original-Maintainer. | 06:16 |
| suji11 | RAOF: I changed the maintainer field in control file as Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com>, and upload it again, but also it shows that warning again. | 06:17 |
| RAOF | suji11: I don't see that upload; the package I see still has you in the Maintainer: field. | 06:19 |
| suji11 | RAOF: ya,but when i give this command dput -f revu iok_1.3.8-0ubuntu1_source.changes it shows "Successfully uploaded packages" | 06:24 |
| suji11 | RAOF: and i'm getting the mails also. | 06:25 |
| suji11 | RAOF: when i go through the link in my mail, the same content there in the previous upload page. | 06:26 |
| siretart | crimsun: no idea, I have to admit that I haven't followed openal lately. I should probably have myself removed from the uploaders field | 06:28 |
| suji11 | RAOF: on top of the files list Details for upload "iok" from user " suji87-msc" - 21 Dec 2009 06:57 this was changed every time | 06:29 |
| RAOF | suji11: How are you changing the maintainer? | 06:33 |
| suji11 | RAOF: i edit the control file, in the maintainer field i put this Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com> | 06:34 |
| RAOF | And have you run dpkg-buildpackage again? | 06:35 |
| suji11 | RAOF: no | 06:35 |
| RAOF | (Or debuild, or however it is you're building the source package) | 06:35 |
| RAOF | Well, that's the problem; you're uploading the same thing every time :) | 06:35 |
| RAOF | You need to rebuild the source package to pick up your changes :) | 06:35 |
| suji11 | RAOF: oh! ok | 06:35 |
| suji11 | RAOF: i will rebuild and upload it again | 06:35 |
| suji11 | RAOF: in the maintainer list should i give this Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com> or the mail id is enough | 06:36 |
| RAOF | That looks right to me. | 06:37 |
| suji11 | RAOF: the mail-id only enough? | 06:37 |
| RAOF | "Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com>" | 06:38 |
| suji11 | RAOF: ok, the warning was cleared http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7255 . but have three warnings yet. what about that? | 06:43 |
| suji11 | RAOF: in the first warning, i check the lintian file, it shows three warnings | 06:45 |
| suji11 | RAOF: I couldn't understand the first warning , second should i change the Standard version as 3.8.3 in control file and third should i remove the config.log file. am right? | 06:48 |
| RAOF | suji11: Have you checked out "Debian Policy Manual section 4.11", as suggested by the first warning? | 06:51 |
| RAOF | For the second one, yes. You should have the Standards-Version as 3.8.3 (and you should also ensure that the package _complies_ with that standard version; it probably does). | 06:52 |
| RAOF | And, yes, as the warning suggests, you should remove the config.log file in the clean: target | 06:52 |
| suji11 | The standard version is automatically generated, can i change it manually? | 06:57 |
| RAOF | Yes; it's not automatically generated, it's just that the template has an older version. | 06:58 |
| suji11 | I checkout the debian policy manual now and here http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dother.en.html also they said about the file watch.ex . but i remove the all the files with the extension .ex and .EX from the debian directory. | 06:58 |
| suji11 | what should i do now? | 06:59 |
| RAOF | Write a new watch file; they're very easy. | 06:59 |
| RAOF | You can check out any number of source packages for examples - I know both specto & gnome-do have watch files, for example. | 06:59 |
| RAOF | "man uscan" also has information. | 06:59 |
| suji11 | hmmm.. ok | 07:00 |
| suji11 | RAOF: ok i will do it and let you know later. Thanks for the help:) | 07:07 |
| dholbach | good morning | 08:32 |
| geser | good morning | 08:38 |
| dholbach | hey geser | 08:38 |
| suji11 | RAFO: i added the watch file, then again i upload my package? or do anything before that? | 09:06 |
| suji11 | RAFO: i added the watch file and upload the package again http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7256 now i have 1 warning yet. What is that? | 09:15 |
| slytherin | suji11: Have you read the warning? | 09:16 |
| suji11 | slytherin: yes, it means the bug should fixed in launchpad which is this package is needed, am right? | 09:18 |
| slytherin | suji11: Is there a bug in launchpad corresponding to this package? | 09:19 |
| suji11 | slytherin: couldn't get... | 09:20 |
| suji11 | slytherin: i upload this package in launchpad ppa, is there a bug in it? | 09:20 |
| slytherin | suji11: Is there a bug filed in launchpad that says 'Please package iok'? | 09:21 |
| suji11 | slytherin: no, i think. | 09:21 |
| slytherin | suji11: It is preferable that you file such a bug before starting to work on a new package so that others know that you are working on it. Also this bug needs to be mentioned in debian/changelog using format - LP: #nnnnnn | 09:22 |
| suji11 | slytherin: oh! should i file that? or some others should file that? | 09:23 |
| slytherin | suji11: see if there is already such a bug. if not then file it. | 09:26 |
| suji11 | slytherin: ok, how to know or search already a bug is there relate to this or not? | 09:27 |
| slytherin | suji11: Just search for iok. :-) | 09:27 |
| === mac_v is now known as kvc | ||
| === kvc is now known as vish | ||
| lazka | Hi guys, I'm trying to automate my package build.. does anyone know how to pass my password to dpkg-buildpackage for signing? | 09:58 |
| lazka | or point me to examples | 09:58 |
| slytherin | lazka: Are you using some password agent like seahorse? | 10:06 |
| lazka | slytherin, yes, it picks up my key id and everything but asks me for the password | 10:07 |
| slytherin | lazka: You can use seahorse for password caching. You can check caching preferences from System -> Preferences -> Encryption and Keyrings. | 10:10 |
| lazka | slytherin, ok thanks, but I don't have that entry, do you meen in seehorse? | 10:13 |
| slytherin | lazka: Do you have seahorse package installed? | 10:14 |
| slytherin | Wait a minute, are you running GNOME? | 10:14 |
| lazka | yes, I have seahorse in accesories | 10:15 |
| lazka | slytherin, -p did the trick I think | 10:22 |
| lazka | thanks | 10:22 |
| lazka | hm.. no | 10:23 |
| lazka | damn | 10:23 |
| lazka | slytherin, the package was seahorse-plugins | 10:50 |
| slytherin | Ok. | 10:50 |
| lazka | but it's not caching anything | 10:54 |
| slytherin | lazka: I believe caching is disabled by default | 11:01 |
| bddebian | Heya gang | 13:00 |
| lucas | what's Maia Kozheva's nickname? | 13:21 |
| slytherin | lucas: LucidFox or sikon | 13:21 |
| * LucidFox raises a hand | 13:22 | |
| lucas | thanks | 13:22 |
| lucas | LucidFox: you should use update-maintainer from ubuntu-dev-tools | 13:22 |
| lucas | LucidFox: you typoed Original-Maintainer in inform | 13:22 |
| LucidFox | What package is this about? | 13:22 |
| LucidFox | Oh. | 13:22 |
| lucas | also, if I remember correctly, you shouldn't use | 13:23 |
| lucas | Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com> | 13:23 |
| LucidFox | What should be used instead? | 13:25 |
| lucas | if I remember correctly, Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> | 13:25 |
| lucas | but now, I can't find the reference for that | 13:25 |
| LucidFox | Does update-maintainer do that automatically? | 13:25 |
| lucas | target_maintainer = "Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>" | 13:26 |
| lucas | yes | 13:26 |
| * LucidFox nods | 13:28 | |
| ScottK | lucas: It was in the minutes of one of the tech board meetings. | 13:28 |
| dholbach | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField | 13:28 |
| lucas | LucidFox: could you fix it for inform? I'm asking because Ultimate Debian Database sends email to me about unknown fields | 13:29 |
| LucidFox | Going to fix it now, thanks. | 13:29 |
| lucas | great, thanks | 13:29 |
| Laney | lucas: UDD carries information about Ubuntu packages too? | 13:33 |
| lucas | Laney: sure | 13:34 |
| Laney | cool, did not know | 13:34 |
| Laney | this could maybe replace MDT then | 13:34 |
| lucas | Laney: totally | 13:34 |
| lucas | Laney: I'm the original author of MDT, and this was one of the motivations for writing UDD | 13:35 |
| dktrkranz | lucas: I take the occasion to thank you for making UDD possible, it's really amazing! | 13:36 |
| lucas | heh, thanks :) | 13:36 |
| === freeflyi1g is now known as freeflying | ||
| === tuantub is now known as tuantub|ia | ||
| === tuantub|ia is now known as tuantub[at]iaxon | ||
| === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat | ||
| === tuantub[at]iaxon is now known as tuantub | ||
| === _stink__ is now known as _stink_ | ||
| === sommer_ is now known as sommer | ||
| === vish is now known as mac_v | ||
| === menesis1 is now known as menesis | ||
| === nhandler is now known as Guest3225 | ||
| === Guest3225 is now known as nhandler | ||
| sharms | can someone review this debdiff for me for lucid? Its a long standing issue I finally figured out: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/ncpfs/+bug/328020 | 18:22 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 328020 in ncpfs "cannot mount NetWare (ipx) server" [Undecided,In progress] | 18:22 |
| sharms | oooh it actually showed up automatically on the sponsor queue link | 18:28 |
| === lukjad007 is now known as lukjad100 | ||
| === lukjad100 is now known as lukjad007 | ||
| dhillon-v10 | hi all, I am trying to package a .jar file into debian package, what should I put in the debian/rules file | 19:26 |
| c_korn | dhillon-v10: as I told you. cp /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny debian/rules | 19:32 |
| dhillon-v10 | c_korn, hi there sorry my client quit for some reason :D | 19:33 |
| c_korn | dhillon-v10: in ubuntu 9.10 you already have debhelper 7. you just need to make use of its features. | 19:34 |
| c_korn | dhillon-v10: change debian/compat to contain "7" and change the debhelper dependency in debian/control to debhelper (>= 7) | 19:34 |
| dhillon-v10 | c_korn, alright, just a sec. then | 19:34 |
| ScottK | dhillon-v10: Java .jars are binary files. You need to start from source. | 19:39 |
| dhillon-v10 | c_korn, I did the changes you suggested now this happens: http://pastebin.com/d57cfd77d | 19:40 |
| dhillon-v10 | ScottK, that bluej on the upstream website has a .deb and this .jar file that's it should I extract the jar file and continue as regular package | 19:40 |
| ScottK | No, you should get the source. | 19:41 |
| === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v | ||
| dhillon-v10 | ScottK, hey I am getting errors on debuild why is that happening: http://pastebin.com/d57cfd77d | 19:50 |
| geser | dhillon-v10: line 22 of your paste | 20:04 |
| dhillon-v10 | geser, ahh smart :D | 20:05 |
| dhillon-v10 | geser, alright I made a change, I extracted the jar file and put the source in a directory with a debian folder. Now debuild works fine, but when I issue a pbuilder command, it builds a .deb that's only 1.8 kb while the jar file was 5.3 mgs | 20:07 |
| geser | I'm not an Java expert but doesn't a .jar file contain the compiled .class files and not the .java files? | 20:10 |
| maxb | geser, Correct, although sometimes .jar files containing .java files are used as input for IDEs to allow them to provide source browsing. | 20:13 |
| geser | dhillon-v10: you have the .java files, right? and from them you build the new .jar which you put into the .deb? | 20:14 |
| maxb | dhillon-v10, You need to clarify whether you're actually trying to produce a package for submission for Ubuntu, including actually building the software from source, or if you're just hacking up an encapsulation of prebuilt binaries into a .deb, which would not be acceptable for Ubuntu. | 20:15 |
| dhillon-v10 | geser, I don't have the .java file for some reason | 20:16 |
| dhillon-v10 | maxb, I am trying to build a package for Ubuntu, this was a bug that needed packaging, but the upstream website has a .deb package build for users. | 20:17 |
| dhillon-v10 | geser, the package only has .class files | 20:17 |
| maxb | dhillon-v10: You must be able to build the software from source, if it is free software | 20:17 |
| geser | then that's not the source as you can't modify it (e.g. apply a patch) | 20:18 |
| dhillon-v10 | maxb, this is what the website says: Currently, the full BlueJ source is not available. However, the source of the editor is. | 20:18 |
| maxb | Or is it not free software? | 20:18 |
| maxb | You would need to consult the guidelines for whether it is acceptable into multiverse, or is not distributable at all, then | 20:19 |
| dhillon-v10 | wait alright I got the right package, sorry :P | 20:19 |
| geser | dhillon-v10: www.bluej.org? | 20:19 |
| ajmitch | did you get it from http://www.bluej.org/download/source-download.html ? | 20:19 |
| dhillon-v10 | geser, yah, I got the wrong package | 20:19 |
| dhillon-v10 | sorry guys, I did get the right package, it has a src folder and a bunch of .java files :D | 20:19 |
| punkrockguy3__ | Hey, I'm a developer on the fceu project (nes emulator). How can I get someone to package the newest version of my program for its universe inclusion? | 20:28 |
| Quintasan | punkrockguy3__: well, we would need tarball first, and list of dependencies would be nice :) | 20:30 |
| punkrockguy3__ | Quintasan: the old version of fceuX was called fceu, and that shouldn't be replaced.. But the new series is called fceuX and should be a seperate package. Link to src: https://sourceforge.net/projects/fceultra/files/Source%20Code/2.1.2%20src/fceux-2.1.2.src.tar.bz2/download Dependencies: libz, libsdl, liblua, zenity | 20:34 |
| punkrockguy3__ | there is also an optional GTK2 launcher (included in the tarbell) that is written in python and python-gtk2 | 20:34 |
| randomaction | punkrockguy3__: you should contact fabrice_sp for that, he made a package for 2.1.2 | 20:36 |
| punkrockguy3__ | randomaction, oh i had no idea there was already a package | 20:37 |
| punkrockguy3__ | randomaction, thanks, PM sent | 20:38 |
| randomaction | punkrockguy3__: and take a look at bug 254352 | 20:39 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 254352 in fceu "New 2.0.0 release with many new bugfixes and features" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/254352 | 20:39 |
| punkrockguy3__ | thanks | 20:53 |
| fabrice_sp | punkrockguy3__, you can find it in revu, also: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/fceux | 21:11 |
| fabrice_sp | if any motu is willing to have anotehr look at it: i'd like to have another opinion before uploading it | 21:12 |
| fabrice_sp | have to go now. Bye | 21:16 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === emgent is now known as z\ | ||
| === z\ is now known as enJoy | ||
| === enJoy is now known as emgent` | ||
| === emgent` is now known as el8 | ||
| === el8 is now known as backtrack | ||
| === backtrack is now known as emgent | ||
| Lure | mok0: around? | 22:37 |
| mok0 | Lure: whassup? | 23:46 |
| Lure | mok0: are you working on debian-science merge? | 23:46 |
| mok0 | Lure, no actually not | 23:47 |
| mok0 | Lure: Is it assigned to me? | 23:47 |
| Lure | ok, merges.u.c has your name listed | 23:47 |
| mok0 | Lure, ah | 23:47 |
| mok0 | You are welcome to take it over if you wish | 23:47 |
| Lure | mok0: I am doing opencv 2.0 transition, so I need to tuch it anyhow | 23:48 |
| mok0 | OK | 23:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!