=== tuantub_ is now known as tuantub === asac_ is now known as asac [04:49] siretart: hi, do you know of any reason not to sync openal-soft_1:1.10.622-1 from Debian testing? === nxvl_ is now known as nxvl === dyfet` is now known as dyfet [05:45] hi, already i upload a package here http://revu.ubuntuwire.com for review with the version 1.3.6, now i have to upload the package with Upgrading it to latest upstream version(1.3.8), how to do it? [05:48] suji11: Just upload it, it will replace the previous one [05:52] ScottK: using this command dput revu package_version_source.changes [05:52] Yes [06:05] ScottK: my packae is here, http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7253 but it shows some warnings. what to do to resolve that? [06:15] suji11: Which warning in particular? They seem fairly self-explanatory to me, but then I've got plenty of experience. [06:16] RAOF: The Maintainer field is invalid. It has to contain an @ubuntu.com address (usually the Ubuntu MOTU Team's). The packager can leave his/her name as XSBC-Original-Maintainer. [06:17] RAOF: I changed the maintainer field in control file as Ubuntu MOTU Developers , and upload it again, but also it shows that warning again. [06:19] suji11: I don't see that upload; the package I see still has you in the Maintainer: field. [06:24] RAOF: ya,but when i give this command dput -f revu iok_1.3.8-0ubuntu1_source.changes it shows "Successfully uploaded packages" [06:25] RAOF: and i'm getting the mails also. [06:26] RAOF: when i go through the link in my mail, the same content there in the previous upload page. [06:28] crimsun: no idea, I have to admit that I haven't followed openal lately. I should probably have myself removed from the uploaders field [06:29] RAOF: on top of the files list Details for upload "iok" from user " suji87-msc" - 21 Dec 2009 06:57 this was changed every time [06:33] suji11: How are you changing the maintainer? [06:34] RAOF: i edit the control file, in the maintainer field i put this Ubuntu MOTU Developers [06:35] And have you run dpkg-buildpackage again? [06:35] RAOF: no [06:35] (Or debuild, or however it is you're building the source package) [06:35] Well, that's the problem; you're uploading the same thing every time :) [06:35] You need to rebuild the source package to pick up your changes :) [06:35] RAOF: oh! ok [06:35] RAOF: i will rebuild and upload it again [06:36] RAOF: in the maintainer list should i give this Ubuntu MOTU Developers or the mail id is enough [06:37] That looks right to me. [06:37] RAOF: the mail-id only enough? [06:38] "Ubuntu MOTU Developers " [06:43] RAOF: ok, the warning was cleared http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7255 . but have three warnings yet. what about that? [06:45] RAOF: in the first warning, i check the lintian file, it shows three warnings [06:48] RAOF: I couldn't understand the first warning , second should i change the Standard version as 3.8.3 in control file and third should i remove the config.log file. am right? [06:51] suji11: Have you checked out "Debian Policy Manual section 4.11", as suggested by the first warning? [06:52] For the second one, yes. You should have the Standards-Version as 3.8.3 (and you should also ensure that the package _complies_ with that standard version; it probably does). [06:52] And, yes, as the warning suggests, you should remove the config.log file in the clean: target [06:57] The standard version is automatically generated, can i change it manually? [06:58] Yes; it's not automatically generated, it's just that the template has an older version. [06:58] I checkout the debian policy manual now and here http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-dother.en.html also they said about the file watch.ex . but i remove the all the files with the extension .ex and .EX from the debian directory. [06:59] what should i do now? [06:59] Write a new watch file; they're very easy. [06:59] You can check out any number of source packages for examples - I know both specto & gnome-do have watch files, for example. [06:59] "man uscan" also has information. [07:00] hmmm.. ok [07:07] RAOF: ok i will do it and let you know later. Thanks for the help:) [08:32] good morning [08:38] good morning [08:38] hey geser [09:06] RAFO: i added the watch file, then again i upload my package? or do anything before that? [09:15] RAFO: i added the watch file and upload the package again http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=7256 now i have 1 warning yet. What is that? [09:16] suji11: Have you read the warning? [09:18] slytherin: yes, it means the bug should fixed in launchpad which is this package is needed, am right? [09:19] suji11: Is there a bug in launchpad corresponding to this package? [09:20] slytherin: couldn't get... [09:20] slytherin: i upload this package in launchpad ppa, is there a bug in it? [09:21] suji11: Is there a bug filed in launchpad that says 'Please package iok'? [09:21] slytherin: no, i think. [09:22] suji11: It is preferable that you file such a bug before starting to work on a new package so that others know that you are working on it. Also this bug needs to be mentioned in debian/changelog using format - LP: #nnnnnn [09:23] slytherin: oh! should i file that? or some others should file that? [09:26] suji11: see if there is already such a bug. if not then file it. [09:27] slytherin: ok, how to know or search already a bug is there relate to this or not? [09:27] suji11: Just search for iok. :-) === mac_v is now known as kvc === kvc is now known as vish [09:58] Hi guys, I'm trying to automate my package build.. does anyone know how to pass my password to dpkg-buildpackage for signing? [09:58] or point me to examples [10:06] lazka: Are you using some password agent like seahorse? [10:07] slytherin, yes, it picks up my key id and everything but asks me for the password [10:10] lazka: You can use seahorse for password caching. You can check caching preferences from System -> Preferences -> Encryption and Keyrings. [10:13] slytherin, ok thanks, but I don't have that entry, do you meen in seehorse? [10:14] lazka: Do you have seahorse package installed? [10:14] Wait a minute, are you running GNOME? [10:15] yes, I have seahorse in accesories [10:22] slytherin, -p did the trick I think [10:22] thanks [10:23] hm.. no [10:23] damn [10:50] slytherin, the package was seahorse-plugins [10:50] Ok. [10:54] but it's not caching anything [11:01] lazka: I believe caching is disabled by default [13:00] Heya gang [13:21] what's Maia Kozheva's nickname? [13:21] lucas: LucidFox or sikon [13:22] * LucidFox raises a hand [13:22] thanks [13:22] LucidFox: you should use update-maintainer from ubuntu-dev-tools [13:22] LucidFox: you typoed Original-Maintainer in inform [13:22] What package is this about? [13:22] Oh. [13:23] also, if I remember correctly, you shouldn't use [13:23] Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers [13:25] What should be used instead? [13:25] if I remember correctly, Ubuntu Developers [13:25] but now, I can't find the reference for that [13:25] Does update-maintainer do that automatically? [13:26] target_maintainer = "Ubuntu Developers " [13:26] yes [13:28] * LucidFox nods [13:28] lucas: It was in the minutes of one of the tech board meetings. [13:28] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebianMaintainerField [13:29] LucidFox: could you fix it for inform? I'm asking because Ultimate Debian Database sends email to me about unknown fields [13:29] Going to fix it now, thanks. [13:29] great, thanks [13:33] lucas: UDD carries information about Ubuntu packages too? [13:34] Laney: sure [13:34] cool, did not know [13:34] this could maybe replace MDT then [13:34] Laney: totally [13:35] Laney: I'm the original author of MDT, and this was one of the motivations for writing UDD [13:36] lucas: I take the occasion to thank you for making UDD possible, it's really amazing! [13:36] heh, thanks :) === freeflyi1g is now known as freeflying === tuantub is now known as tuantub|ia === tuantub|ia is now known as tuantub[at]iaxon === funkyHat_ is now known as funkyHat === tuantub[at]iaxon is now known as tuantub === _stink__ is now known as _stink_ === sommer_ is now known as sommer === vish is now known as mac_v === menesis1 is now known as menesis === nhandler is now known as Guest3225 === Guest3225 is now known as nhandler [18:22] can someone review this debdiff for me for lucid? Its a long standing issue I finally figured out: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/ncpfs/+bug/328020 [18:22] Ubuntu bug 328020 in ncpfs "cannot mount NetWare (ipx) server" [Undecided,In progress] [18:28] oooh it actually showed up automatically on the sponsor queue link === lukjad007 is now known as lukjad100 === lukjad100 is now known as lukjad007 [19:26] hi all, I am trying to package a .jar file into debian package, what should I put in the debian/rules file [19:32] dhillon-v10: as I told you. cp /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny debian/rules [19:33] c_korn, hi there sorry my client quit for some reason :D [19:34] dhillon-v10: in ubuntu 9.10 you already have debhelper 7. you just need to make use of its features. [19:34] dhillon-v10: change debian/compat to contain "7" and change the debhelper dependency in debian/control to debhelper (>= 7) [19:34] c_korn, alright, just a sec. then [19:39] dhillon-v10: Java .jars are binary files. You need to start from source. [19:40] c_korn, I did the changes you suggested now this happens: http://pastebin.com/d57cfd77d [19:40] ScottK, that bluej on the upstream website has a .deb and this .jar file that's it should I extract the jar file and continue as regular package [19:41] No, you should get the source. === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v [19:50] ScottK, hey I am getting errors on debuild why is that happening: http://pastebin.com/d57cfd77d [20:04] dhillon-v10: line 22 of your paste [20:05] geser, ahh smart :D [20:07] geser, alright I made a change, I extracted the jar file and put the source in a directory with a debian folder. Now debuild works fine, but when I issue a pbuilder command, it builds a .deb that's only 1.8 kb while the jar file was 5.3 mgs [20:10] I'm not an Java expert but doesn't a .jar file contain the compiled .class files and not the .java files? [20:13] geser, Correct, although sometimes .jar files containing .java files are used as input for IDEs to allow them to provide source browsing. [20:14] dhillon-v10: you have the .java files, right? and from them you build the new .jar which you put into the .deb? [20:15] dhillon-v10, You need to clarify whether you're actually trying to produce a package for submission for Ubuntu, including actually building the software from source, or if you're just hacking up an encapsulation of prebuilt binaries into a .deb, which would not be acceptable for Ubuntu. [20:16] geser, I don't have the .java file for some reason [20:17] maxb, I am trying to build a package for Ubuntu, this was a bug that needed packaging, but the upstream website has a .deb package build for users. [20:17] geser, the package only has .class files [20:17] dhillon-v10: You must be able to build the software from source, if it is free software [20:18] then that's not the source as you can't modify it (e.g. apply a patch) [20:18] maxb, this is what the website says: Currently, the full BlueJ source is not available. However, the source of the editor is. [20:18] Or is it not free software? [20:19] You would need to consult the guidelines for whether it is acceptable into multiverse, or is not distributable at all, then [20:19] wait alright I got the right package, sorry :P [20:19] dhillon-v10: www.bluej.org? [20:19] did you get it from http://www.bluej.org/download/source-download.html ? [20:19] geser, yah, I got the wrong package [20:19] sorry guys, I did get the right package, it has a src folder and a bunch of .java files :D [20:28] Hey, I'm a developer on the fceu project (nes emulator). How can I get someone to package the newest version of my program for its universe inclusion? [20:30] punkrockguy3__: well, we would need tarball first, and list of dependencies would be nice :) [20:34] Quintasan: the old version of fceuX was called fceu, and that shouldn't be replaced.. But the new series is called fceuX and should be a seperate package. Link to src: https://sourceforge.net/projects/fceultra/files/Source%20Code/2.1.2%20src/fceux-2.1.2.src.tar.bz2/download Dependencies: libz, libsdl, liblua, zenity [20:34] there is also an optional GTK2 launcher (included in the tarbell) that is written in python and python-gtk2 [20:36] punkrockguy3__: you should contact fabrice_sp for that, he made a package for 2.1.2 [20:37] randomaction, oh i had no idea there was already a package [20:38] randomaction, thanks, PM sent [20:39] punkrockguy3__: and take a look at bug 254352 [20:39] Launchpad bug 254352 in fceu "New 2.0.0 release with many new bugfixes and features" [Wishlist,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/254352 [20:53] thanks [21:11] punkrockguy3__, you can find it in revu, also: http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/fceux [21:12] if any motu is willing to have anotehr look at it: i'd like to have another opinion before uploading it [21:16] have to go now. Bye === yofel_ is now known as yofel === emgent is now known as z\ === z\ is now known as enJoy === enJoy is now known as emgent` === emgent` is now known as el8 === el8 is now known as backtrack === backtrack is now known as emgent [22:37] mok0: around? [23:46] Lure: whassup? [23:46] mok0: are you working on debian-science merge? [23:47] Lure, no actually not [23:47] Lure: Is it assigned to me? [23:47] ok, merges.u.c has your name listed [23:47] Lure, ah [23:47] You are welcome to take it over if you wish [23:48] mok0: I am doing opencv 2.0 transition, so I need to tuch it anyhow [23:49] OK