=== asac_ is now known as asac [02:28] Firefox 3.5 is the most popular browser: http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser_version-ww-weekly-200927-200951 === mac_v is now known as kvc === kvc is now known as vish [11:31] morning [15:00] security updates to FireFox 3.0.x in Ubuntu 8.04 [15:00] have [15:00] been based on security updates from upstream (Mozilla project [15:01] the stream of security updates from upstream is about to stop? [15:01] is this correct? [15:02] does ubuntu 8.0.4 comes with a brand newe version? [15:02] *new [15:05] !info firefox [15:05] firefox (source: firefox-3.5): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.5.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 (karmic), package size 71 kB, installed size 128 kB [15:05] !info hardy firefox [15:05] 'firefox' is not a valid distribution: hardy, hardy-backports, intrepid, intrepid-backports, jaunty, jaunty-backports, karmic, karmic-backports, karmic-proposed, kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, lucid, lucid-backports, lucid-proposed, medibuntu, partner [15:06] !info firefox hardy [15:06] firefox (source: firefox-3.0): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.16+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 (hardy), package size 65 kB, installed size 120 kB [15:06] !info firefox hardy-backports [15:06] Package firefox does not exist in hardy-backports [15:06] !info firefox hardy-updates [15:06] 'hardy-updates' is not a valid distribution: hardy, hardy-backports, intrepid, intrepid-backports, jaunty, jaunty-backports, karmic, karmic-backports, karmic-proposed, kubuntu-backports, kubuntu-experimental, kubuntu-updates, lucid, lucid-backports, lucid-proposed, medibuntu, partner [15:06] abh [15:10] !info firefox hardy 8.04.4 [15:10] firefox (source: firefox-3.0): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.16+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 (hardy), package size 65 kB, installed size 120 kB [15:12] <[reed]> leoquant: Firefox 3.0.x will be EOL'd by upstream soon (January) [15:13] <[reed]> especially considering Firefox 3.5.x is the current stable version, and Firefox 3.6.x will be coming out soon [15:14] [reed] thx [15:16] that means a 3.5.x in 8.04.4.... === vish is now known as mac_v [15:24] or ubuntu provides this sec. related updates in 3.0.x ? [15:31] H. I don't know if this is the right place for this. My question is about Thunderbird. Is it possible to search for a string inside the attachment ? (plugin or any other solution) [16:33] asac: ping re ff update patch [16:51] hi [16:51] Ive got problem with my thunderbird [16:52] mails from befor 12th December dissapeared from my Inbox [16:52] why's that? [16:52] Rotwang: idk, what happened on the 12th? [16:52] no idea [16:53] here at my workplace thunderbird is used very extensively [16:53] one of the workers here have this problem [16:53] and i have no idea why it could just dissapear from Inbox [16:54] is it possible that Inbox file was too huge? [16:54] shouldn't be [16:55] the messages was listed in thunderbird but couldnt be opened [16:55] after indexing folder, theyve dissapeard [16:56] ive checked if any options that make thunderbird to delete messages was turned on, but they wasnt [16:56] Rotwang which version? [16:57] 2.0.0.22 [16:58] Rotwang: have you tried 2.0.023? [16:58] that's been out for a while [16:58] i cannot update thunderbird [16:58] im just a help desk technician [16:59] but i wonder why it dissapeard [17:00] any ideas? [17:00] hmmm, well the only fix in 2.0.0.23 was a security fix [17:01] Rotwang: is it imap or pop? [17:01] pop [17:02] Rotwang: pop with save on server? [17:02] without [17:02] wow [17:02] why wow? [17:02] ok, can you check the thunderbird profile to see if the messages are there? [17:02] Rotwang: no copies [17:03] micahg: how do i do it? [17:03] Rotwang: I'm assuming this is on Ubuntu? [17:03] ive grepped many times mozilla folder for 11 Dec [17:03] micahg: sure [17:03] Ubuntu 9.04 [17:03] in ~/.mozilla-thunderbird, there should be a profile directory [17:04] inside that profile directory, there should be a Mail directory, then inside that there should be a Local Folders directory [17:05] then try the command: head Inbox [17:05] see what date the first message is [17:05] 12 Dec [17:06] btw, ive checked auth.log it seems noone logged to that machine at 12 Dec [17:09] the worst is, I have no idea why that happened [17:10] well, maybe there is some info i could provide to debug this? [17:11] ive got root access [17:11] Rotwang: well, the messages seem gone then unless they were moved to another folder [17:12] asac: would it be ok to pull dh_xulrunner from debian and add it to xul-1.9.1-dev? === mac_v_ is now known as mac_v [20:48] hi, do you know why dejavu sans mono is insisting on using hintslight not hintfull despite me setting it explicitly in .fonts.conf but i have the the appearance in gnome set to hintslight. hope that makes sense [21:40] asac, micahg: any idea for a name for my bot? to go with this logo: http://www.sofaraway.org/ubuntu/tmp/ppabot-192-192.png [21:41] FabBot? [21:42] nice graphic :) [21:44] too bad it doesn't render well in 14x14 :( [21:47] maybe debbot, or debot [21:47] dabot? [21:48] dappabot? [21:48] or deppabot? [21:49] no, not ppa, the bot is not limited to ppas, you can use it to maintain a package in the repo [21:49] oh, ok [21:49] fta: how about dubot? [21:50] Debian Upload BOt [21:50] for a while, before the ppa even existed, i was maintaining ff with it [21:50] hm, nice [21:51] or dpmb (debian package maintenance bot) [21:51] dubot sounds french to me [21:52] drobotik? [21:53] fta: is there anything wrong with something french sounding? [21:53] nope [21:53] fta: have you talked with asac today? [21:55] nope [21:55] holidays [21:55] ah, so he's off this week? [21:56] he didn't say, but i guess so [21:56] ok [21:56] so, should I just patch ff37 in the mean time and talk about dropping the patch when he gets back [21:57] do it, we can always revert if he wants to [21:57] fta: patch it or drop it? [21:57] drop it [21:58] fta: ok [21:58] fta: did you see my message about prism yesterday? [21:59] i wanted to check if it's not a bug in my bot, but i didn't have time [21:59] ok [23:38] [reed]: do I need to have someone push the patches that I asked for approval for? [23:44] jcastro, ripps: http://identi.ca/conversation/17175657#notice-17190196 [23:45] if you have suggestions.. [23:58] fta: ooh, I will think hard! [23:58] http://www.morewords.com/contains/bot/ [23:59] fta: bottleneck would be awesome, because of what it does to launchpad!