[00:04] mm [00:04] you know, the scanner and the puller being different processes is pretty crackladen [00:30] er === mwhudson_ is now known as mwhudson [00:30] is make run_all broken? [00:31] * mwhudson grrs [01:06] * mwhudson afk for a couple of hours [05:57] wow that took longer than i expected [05:57] jml: i hope you haven't had too lonely an afternoon [05:57] mwhudson, no, not really. [05:59] mwhudson, actually, now would be a great time for me to review your branches. [06:00] jml: i was planning on having dinner and then working into the evening a bit [06:00] jml: would you like to talk about my branches now, or after you've looked a bit? [06:00] mwhudson, ok. I've got an appointment in an hour. [06:00] let me think. [06:09] mwhudson, sorry. that took too long. [06:09] jml: :) [06:09] mwhudson, let's talk now, if that's ok. [06:09] jml: ok [06:09] jml: let me get my headset [06:10] jml: skype doesn't seem to think you're online [06:10] ah, it does now [06:11] jml: yay linux audio? [06:49] g'night all. [07:44] BjornT_: around? Just wondering if you're looking at the memcached vs. windmill layer buildbot issue? [08:08] hi noodles775 [08:08] hi poolie [08:09] Looking forward to the European chill? [08:10] -6C in strasbourg yesterday [08:10] it's going to be a bit of a shock [09:12] ImportError: No module named memcache [09:12] what did i do wrong? [09:13] Morning! [09:14] oh, make [09:14] probably === jtv1 is now known as jtv [10:20] hi mrevell! how's the head? [10:21] al-maisan: hi! I filed bug 499350, but it may already be included in your work on bug 484819... just making sure it's not forgotten. [10:21] Bug #499350: BuildQueue still tied to BuildPackageJob [10:21] Bug #484819: The job dispatch time estimation needs to be generalized to cope with the various build farm types [10:21] Hi there jtv, still sore, believe it or not, but not too bad. [10:50] al-maisan: if it's stuff you're not covering, maybe it's a nice task for me—or maybe it should go into the sprint... Chat? [10:51] jtv: sorry .. status meeting + got distracted on #lp .. let me look now. [10:51] :) [10:54] jtv: I nailed down the first bullet point in the forthcoming job dispatch time estimation branch (http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/344638/), noodles775 is looking at the 2nd: build farm candidate job selection [10:55] al-maisan: am I? I'm not currently and it's not on my immediate plans (my next venture on that work will be bug 491330) [10:55] Bug #491330: Update Builder history UI for generalised builders [10:55] ie. IBuilder.getBuildRecords() [10:56] noodles775: oh, I must have misunderstood then, I thought you were looking into build candidate selection, no? [10:56] al-maisan: I'll remove the one about specific_job from the bug [10:56] jtv: thanks [10:57] al-maisan: no, I wrote an email about an idea for simplifying it, but that's it. [10:57] it might be that I do work on it later, not sure, but my immediate work will be getBuildRecords() [10:57] jtv: anyway, the build candidate selection is somewhat similar to the dispatch time estimation [10:58] al-maisan: it's complicated, I suppose, by the fact that it returns packagebuildjobs as well as buildqueues [11:01] jtv: the relevance of the getForBuilds() method is someewhat reduced by the fact that it's used only once so far (in the soyuz browser layer) [11:02] al-maisan: that's a relief—it means it won't get in our way. It'll just ignore our jobs. [11:03] jtv: re. difficulty: I am recycling from a recent email on the subject [11:03] In the end this is somewhat of a balancing act -- you want to implement [11:03] general build farm mechanisms in a general fashion while allowing for [11:03] some degree of build farm job type specific customisation. [11:06] al-maisan: it doesn't look _too_ hard to generalize all of these with a single approach... "Add your BuildFarmJob type to this list of classes" [11:09] jtv: the devil is in the detail .. please have a look at the email I just forwarded to you [11:10] al-maisan: thanks [11:10] I will [11:49] al-maisan: btw Job Of Interest is now TLA #23498 in the GTF [11:49] Bug #23498: FTBFS/mipsel: Please stop building java bindings for mipsel [11:50] no mup, that's not a bug [11:50] jtv: what is "GTF"? [11:50] al-maisan: http://xs4all.nl/~jtv/gtf/ [11:51] jtv: Ah! Very nice :) [11:51] al-maisan: with a contribution by DEK. :) [11:51] * al-maisan looks up DEK [11:52] But you, too, can now use the GCP logo to show that you're a contributor. :-) [11:52] :) === ursula is now known as Ursinha [13:07] Hello [13:10] anyone ever tried ditching apache? === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado [17:44] Aim_: I have heard it said that the production Launchpad actually uses Pound [17:46] haha, what [17:46] not for 3 or 4 years now [17:46] LP is a mix of apache, squid and haproxy [17:46] LP.net that is === deryck is now known as deryck[lunch] [18:00] night all === deryck[lunch] is now known as deryck [20:01] good morning [20:02] hi [22:10] mwhudson, hi [22:14] hi jml [22:15] poolie, hello [22:38] jml: good day [22:39] mwhudson, good day to you too. [22:56] hm, bzr 2.1b4 got released [22:56] i guess i could upgrade us to that