=== jk-_ is now known as jk- | ||
junjun | hi | 06:57 |
---|---|---|
junjun | it seems Ubuntu 9.10 kernel doesnt turn on fast call feature? | 06:58 |
junjun | I checked, and found that MSR SYSENTER_CS = 0 | 06:58 |
junjun | please, anybody knows why is that? | 06:58 |
junjun | that happens with kernel 2.6.31 (-generic), Ubuntu 9.10 | 06:59 |
=== hzhang__ is now known as panda|phenom | ||
maxb | I have a weird problem (bug 492392) for which I'm contemplating bisecting the kernel. Are there instructions on how best to do this on Ubuntu? | 11:31 |
ubot3` | Malone bug 492392 in linux "[lucid, intel] After suspend, flickering screen and then blank screen." [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/492392 | 11:32 |
apw | maxb, not really any goo dones i know of | 11:44 |
maxb | Guess I'll just try a vanilla-style kernel build from upstream git and hope that works out for me | 11:46 |
jk-_ | maxb: if you're just looking at trying a mainline kernel, take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/MainlineBuilds | 11:49 |
=== jk-_ is now known as jk- | ||
maxb | well, the main objective is to bisect | 11:51 |
jk- | sure | 11:52 |
maxb | Gah, If I wasn't on holiday I could probably bisect with the prebuilt drm-intel-next images :-/ | 11:57 |
maxb | Net connection here just isn't up to it, though | 11:57 |
apw | maxb whats the intel h/w there? | 12:10 |
maxb | apw: "Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME, 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)" | 12:48 |
maxb | In an Aspire One | 12:48 |
maxb | kernel build on netbook is slooooow | 12:49 |
maxb | I think I need to trim down the config | 12:49 |
apw | maxb, don't do that, it hurts | 12:49 |
apw | (building on a netbook, i have heard reports of 5 hours | 12:49 |
maxb | Shorter than running the Launchpad testsuite, then | 12:49 |
maxb | :-) | 12:49 |
dandel | maxb, does your netbook have a solid state disk? | 12:49 |
maxb | No, HD | 12:50 |
apw | well at least it won't die as well | 12:50 |
apw | maxb how slow is your downlink where you are? | 12:50 |
apw | if you only have to download the binary package, its 20mb | 12:51 |
maxb | I'm starting to think that would be better :-) | 12:52 |
maxb | It's ADSL, but pretty poor ADSL | 12:52 |
dandel | apw, the final bug result from the acpi team of linux on ubuntu bug number 338701 has been decided. | 12:52 |
apw | so at least 3Mb/s | 12:52 |
maxb | hah | 12:52 |
maxb | oh, maybe, in megabits/s | 12:53 |
maxb | 26MB for an image isn't that bad. Repeat many times over for bisecting, however... | 12:53 |
* maxb ponders USB-booting brother's desktop into linux :-) | 12:54 | |
apw | maxb it needs to be a quick USB stick to not be slower | 12:55 |
apw | maxb should be like 8 or 10 max for a bisect no? | 12:55 |
apw | i am doing one now, with builds, and its sayind ~6 | 12:56 |
apw | arrrg, and i just built the wrong damn thing | 12:58 |
=== NCommander is now known as bjf | ||
=== bjf is now known as NCommander | ||
apw | NCommander, having fun? | 13:06 |
NCommander | apw, we had to release the meeting bot's lock | 13:06 |
NCommander | apw, bjf forgot to #endmeeting | 13:06 |
apw | oh how did you figure out it was him? | 13:06 |
apw | we had that the other day | 13:06 |
NCommander | apw, read the logs | 13:06 |
NCommander | apw, the bot just checks the nick so I just changed my to bjf so I could #endmeeting :-) | 13:07 |
apw | very sensible. i think that means its been that way since tue last week | 13:07 |
apw | and that makes sense cause we had a netsplit and he couldn't finish the meeting | 13:07 |
NCommander | apw, its a pity the bot doesn't just auto-timeout after awhile | 13:15 |
apw | or take #endmeeting DAMMIT | 13:16 |
apw | as an override | 13:16 |
NCommander | ahahaha :-) | 13:16 |
apw | it may as well as its actualy so easy to frig anyhow | 13:17 |
hanshenrik | (test if i can send messages here, no need to reply) | 13:34 |
=== BenC1 is now known as BenC | ||
paissad-hp | hi | 15:17 |
crimsun | bjf-afk: I've completed the powerdown fixes for Analog Devices HDA codecs. In lieu of rebuilding kernel images, may I toss you the patch and ask you to apply it for your c-o-d debs so that we can get testing coverage before I officially submit it? | 15:40 |
crimsun | bjf-afk: also, I'm just about finished with similar fixes for Realtek HDA codecs, should be finished around the first week of the new calendar year given holidays, etc. | 15:41 |
rtg | crimsun, you should send him an email. I think he's scheduled for vacation until Jan 4, | 15:45 |
crimsun | rtg: cheers | 15:46 |
apw | tjaalton, about? | 16:23 |
tjaalton | apw: yo | 16:27 |
apw | tjaalton, do you have a copy of roaf's nouveau-scratchpad branch anywhere? the one with the four exports etc for nouveau| | 16:28 |
apw | his site seems to be in a hole | 16:28 |
tjaalton | apw: would it be easier to pick them up from what went in .33? | 16:29 |
apw | and it sounded like you had seen it when we talked yesterday | 16:29 |
tjaalton | I haven't copied it, no | 16:29 |
apw | i don't want the whole heap of drm changes | 16:29 |
tjaalton | just the nouveau ones | 16:29 |
apw | for this intial evaluation, i want to test his contention that it can be pulled in | 16:29 |
apw | i'll have to go look whats in .33 then ... hoping to save some scrabbling | 16:29 |
tjaalton | a sec, I'll give you the emails | 16:30 |
apw | i have the branch name, just its down | 16:30 |
tjaalton | no I mean the ones airlied sent | 16:30 |
tjaalton | on dri-devel@ | 16:30 |
apw | ah ok | 16:30 |
apw | perfect | 16:30 |
tjaalton | http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=126053204310096&w=2 | 16:33 |
tjaalton | and http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&m=126053272211046&w=2 | 16:34 |
apw | tjaalton, most excellent, thanks | 16:36 |
apw | jjohansen, i am about to push yet another rebased lucid ec2 tree to PPA for testing, anything pending for lucid ec2? | 18:18 |
jjohansen | apw: no, I have some configs I am playing with but nothing I am ready to push | 18:25 |
apw | ack | 18:25 |
apw | Keybuk, you about? wait-for-root is your all new libudev interface thingy yes? | 18:38 |
apw | [ 1.577237] wait-for-root[302]: segfault at 0 ip 00007f52856877c2 sp 00007fffeebc9ac8 error 4 in libc.so.6[7f5285608000+166000] | 18:38 |
Keybuk | hmm | 18:40 |
Keybuk | apw: which call was that? | 18:40 |
apw | thats all i have reported | 18:40 |
apw | bug #499422 | 18:41 |
ubot3` | Malone bug 499422 in linux "[lucid] early segmentation fault in libc during startup" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/499422 | 18:41 |
apw | currently reported against the kernel. there are rumors that it goes away if you turn of KMS, but also random reports of it ocurring with some kernels and not others | 18:41 |
apw | sounds like a race somewhere to me | 18:41 |
apw | i think a task on wait-for-root is appropriate at least for now, is that udev? | 18:42 |
Keybuk | initramfs-tools | 18:42 |
mpt | Hi, I have a packaging question: Why do all the kernel image packages have "Section: base" rather than "Section: kernel"? | 18:49 |
Keybuk | I think the kernel section is new | 18:50 |
apw | hrm, hadn't heard there was a new section for kernels | 18:50 |
Keybuk | mpt: we don't keep up to date on debian-policy as obsessively as Debian do | 18:51 |
Keybuk | apw: added about six months ago; http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2009/03/msg00010.html | 18:51 |
mpt | I'd thought maybe it was old and being abandoned. I hadn't thought it was new and just not yet adopted. :-) | 18:51 |
mpt | thanks Keybuk | 18:52 |
apw | Keybuk, should be we switching? | 18:52 |
mpt | Keybuk, I see that message has definitions of the new sections, but <http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#s-subsections> does not. Is there a list of official definitions somewhere? | 18:53 |
* apw is half sure we just changed them | 18:53 | |
apw | UBUNTU: Use section 'admin' rather than 'base' | 18:54 |
apw | yeah our kernels are in admin now | 18:54 |
mpt | "admin" isn't "kernels" either | 18:55 |
mpt | or "kernel", I should say | 18:56 |
apw | admin _is_ where the archive admins asked us to move it to though | 18:56 |
apw | perhaps we don't have a kernels in ubuntu | 18:56 |
mpt | We do, it contains half a dozen packages | 18:56 |
Keybuk | mpt: debian-policy has the list somewhere | 18:57 |
apw | well cjwatson supplied the patch to change it to admin ... hrm | 18:57 |
mpt | drbd8-source, linux-firmware-nonfree, batman-adv-source, etc (this is all in 9.10) | 18:57 |
Keybuk | mpt: in fact, it has the list at the URL you just gave | 18:57 |
mpt | Keybuk, yes, I'm looking for definitions of each of those. | 18:57 |
Keybuk | oh, doubt it | 18:57 |
Keybuk | it's probably worth a bug assigned to cjwatson to make a decision | 18:58 |
Keybuk | section can affect things like CD image generation | 18:58 |
Keybuk | moving the kernel suddenly could break things | 18:58 |
apw | yeah ... he changed it to match the archive overrides as that made accepting new kernels much easier | 18:58 |
mpt | Keybuk, ok, I'll report it unless someone who can't stand someone as ignorant as me doing it says they'll do it first ;-) | 19:00 |
apw | feel free, could you tag it lucid please | 19:01 |
mpt | Is drbd8-source (for example) still in "kernel" section in Lucid? I'm not running it yet, and packages.ubuntu.com doesn't say | 19:07 |
mpt | (and neither does <https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/i386/drbd8-source/2:8.3.3-0ubuntu1>) | 19:09 |
mpt | Reported bug 499557. Thanks for the info | 19:15 |
ubot3` | Malone bug 499557 in ubuntu-meta "Kernel packages don't have "Section: kernel", but other packages do" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/499557 | 19:15 |
dhillon-v10 | hey guys, I am looking at the bug here: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/287576 what should be done in this case, it seems that the bug has been fixed for one person but not others | 19:17 |
ubot3` | Malone bug 287576 in linux "usb devices not recognized automatically when plugged in a hub" [Medium,Incomplete] | 19:17 |
apw | was the one person the reporter? | 19:30 |
apw | dhillon-v10, looks to be the reporter who is reporting things are fixed | 19:31 |
apw | noone else has repsonded to testing requests, so as its fixed for the reporter pretty much by definnition it is fixed, and it appears we released a stable update to fix it, so Fix Released | 19:32 |
apw | i would move it Fix Released with the comment "if you are still having issues it must be another similar issue and needs a new bug" | 19:33 |
dhillon-v10 | apw, thanks that's one bug down :D | 19:35 |
apw | cool. like the sounds of that | 19:37 |
dhillon-v10 | apw, can you check if this one looks right: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/144305 | 21:05 |
ubot3` | Malone bug 144305 in linux "sleep on powerbook crashes" [Undecided,Fix released] | 21:05 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!