| persia | Is there something wonky with bazaar.lp.net today? I'm not getting the expected revision 61 when clicking for details from https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/netbook.lucid . | 00:13 |
|---|---|---|
| mwhudson | persia: that does look pretty wonky | 00:15 |
| spiv | That's reading at least 7.5 wonks on my finely calibrated wonkometer. | 00:16 |
| mwhudson | persia: there seems to be some disagreement on how many revisions there are in that branch | 00:16 |
| wgrant | Impressive. | 00:16 |
| persia | So this is a problem with the branch, or with the hosting service? | 00:16 |
| spiv | mwhudson: they look like different ancestries, really | 00:16 |
| mwhudson | persia, spiv: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/netbook.lucid/.bzr/branch/last-revision looks wrong | 00:16 |
| spiv | mwhudson: oh, hmm. | 00:16 |
| mwhudson | there is a bzr bug where the last revno goes wrong | 00:17 |
| mwhudson | persia: branch | 00:17 |
| persia | Ah, good. That's easier to fix. | 00:17 |
| mwhudson | i think reconcile will fix it | 00:17 |
| persia | So just reconcile and push? | 00:17 |
| mwhudson | oh hm | 00:18 |
| mwhudson | spiv: help persia? i'm on a call :) | 00:18 |
| spiv | ok | 00:19 |
| spiv | persia: I'm just confirming that mwhudson's hypothesis is correct | 00:20 |
| persia | spiv: OK. I'll arrange for a reconcile and push :) | 00:22 |
| spiv | persia: thanks. I think that is almost certainly the issue FWIW | 00:24 |
| persia | Well, with luck it will be worth at least 7.5 wonks. | 00:26 |
| spiv | persia: I'd love to know how that branch got to that state, but I think I'm out of luck there... | 00:26 |
| persia | spiv: Does pulling the branch change the state? Or is there something more complex involved? | 00:27 |
| spiv | persia: pulling does change the branch being pulled from, no. | 00:27 |
| spiv | Er, | 00:27 |
| persia | For instance, would it be useful to try to get the last committer to perform some actions locally to try to identify how it got that way? | 00:27 |
| spiv | *does not* | 00:27 |
| spiv | My typing is terrible today. | 00:27 |
| persia | So, shouldn't it be possible to check the history to determine how the state was reached from a branch? | 00:27 |
| spiv | persia: yes, possibly | 00:28 |
| spiv | We don't record the history of branch states; that would be meta-history if you see what I mean. | 00:28 |
| spiv | We track mundane things like "revision Y follows revision X" ;) | 00:28 |
| persia | Aha. Yes, that might make it tricky to get the state. | 00:28 |
| spiv | There may be some clues in the code hosting log files, but the server-side logging at the moment is largely useless :/ | 00:30 |
| spiv | Ideally we'd discover that someone with an ancient version of bzr did a push/commit that did that, and thus we could just assume that it's a bug we've fixed ;) | 00:31 |
| spiv | My guess is some sort of transient issue relating to stacking. | 00:31 |
| spiv | But I really have no idea. | 00:32 |
| spiv | persia: actually, one thought that does occur... | 00:35 |
| spiv | persia: there's a good chance that whoever updated that branch on Launchpad with the wrong revno has a similarly afflicted branch or heavyweight checkout locally. | 00:35 |
| spiv | persia: which would a) maybe give some clues about the environment that caused it, b) be something to find and fix in case they break it again :) | 00:36 |
| spiv | Although I'm a little surprised bzr let them override the revno like that... in at least some cases it would require a --overwrite flag to do that. | 00:37 |
| persia | Right. Shall I ask them to archive it somewhere, and file a bug for investigation? | 00:37 |
| spiv | (and if it doesn't that's a whole other bug!) | 00:37 |
| spiv | persia: maybe ask them to capture their ~/.bzr.log and ~/.bzr.log.old | 00:37 |
| persia | I'll even ask them to stop by here and say something :) | 00:38 |
| persia | (debugging by proxy is tricky) | 00:38 |
| spiv | The branch itself... probably not important, although maybe what the branch.conf says about stacking would be interesting. | 00:38 |
| spiv | Certainly there's no harm except disk space in archiving it ;) | 00:38 |
| spiv | I fear there's a good chance that the cause won't be evident in what's left on disk, though :/ | 00:39 |
| spiv | Hopefully I'm wrong. | 00:39 |
| persia | Indeed. It would be good to be able to make sure this doesn't happen again. | 00:40 |
| spiv | Yeah. | 00:42 |
| spiv | I wonder if setting the append_revisions_only flag in the branch on LP would help? | 00:42 |
| mwhudson | iirc the bzr bug was something to do with merging into an empty tree | 00:45 |
| === abentley1 is now known as abentley | ||
| StevenK | Hi. I'm noticing some strange behaviour with edge. Browsing to https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/netbook.lucid gives me the right history for the bzr branch, but clicking revision 61 doesn't give the right information | 03:10 |
| crimsun | welcome to three hours ago | 03:12 |
| crimsun | (see http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/12/23/%23launchpad.txt) | 03:13 |
| mwhudson | StevenK: the branch is busticated somehow | 03:21 |
| mwhudson | StevenK: all the data is there, so if you branch it and then maybe reconcile it, it'll be ok | 03:22 |
| StevenK | mwhudson: My copy here is a checkout, I can do it on a bound branch? | 03:22 |
| mwhudson | hm, don't know | 03:23 |
| mwhudson | i doubt it would be harmful | 03:23 |
| * StevenK branches a fresh copy | 03:23 | |
| mwhudson | the damage is (probably) only "cosmetic" in that the revnos are a bit messed up | 03:23 |
| StevenK | Fixing last revision info 61 => 1424 | 03:24 |
| StevenK | I should just push that into LP? | 03:24 |
| mwhudson | StevenK: yes, though i guess the scanner won't look at it again until a new revision is pushed | 03:30 |
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| StevenK | mwhudson: I can't push it, there is no new revisions to push | 03:32 |
| mwhudson | StevenK: you can probably uncommit one revision in your checkout, wait a minute or so for lp to notice and then push from your reconciled branch | 03:34 |
| StevenK | mwhudson: Hah, nasty. | 03:35 |
| mwhudson | yeah | 03:35 |
| spiv | StevenK: I'd love to know how you got your checkout into that state | 03:38 |
| StevenK | spiv: I have no idea :-/ | 03:38 |
| * spiv nods | 03:38 | |
| spiv | StevenK: care to mail me your ~/.bzr.log and ~/.bzr.log.old, just in case? | 03:38 |
| StevenK | spiv: From the bound branch? | 03:39 |
| StevenK | Oh, never mind. | 03:39 |
| ActionParsnip1 | hey guys | 09:36 |
| JanC | hmpf, don't send launchpad lists mails from the list if my mail address is already somewhere in the recipients headers of a mail? | 09:36 |
| ActionParsnip1 | can someone have a word with the user whom marked my perfectly valid bug as invalid here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/devede/+bug/498890 it was a bug, updates have fixed it yet it was dismissed as invalid | 09:38 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 498890 in devede "Devede cannot find mplayer" [Undecided,Fix released] | 09:38 |
| tommytomtom | noodles775: any word on dput and lazy8ledger? | 09:40 |
| tommytomtom | al-maisan: any word on dput and lazy8ledger? | 09:42 |
| noodles775 | tommytomtom: was that the changes file that didn't have a binary field? | 09:43 |
| * noodles775 checks log from yesterday - as there were a few upload issues. | 09:43 | |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: Did you see the problems that were mentioned in here about 22 hours ago? | 09:43 |
| wgrant | Your debian/control file has several problems. | 09:44 |
| tommytomtom | noodles775: ok. how do I get the "binary field".. No I did not see the problems. | 09:44 |
| noodles775 | <noodles775> geser: thomas , al-maisan : yay, we can get the exception info on dogfood: Unable to find mandatory field 'binary' in the changes file. http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/344696/ | 09:44 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: what do I need to add to the control file? | 09:44 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: That control file looks like you've taken it from a binary package. Is that correct? | 09:45 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: no, I have deperately contructed it from partially the package-docs on lauchpad and other packages and then finally all the complaints from lintian | 09:47 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: The packaging documentation will not lead you to construct a debian/control that looks like that. | 09:47 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: it is you could say, a work of art | 09:47 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: Which documentation did you read? | 09:48 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic | 09:49 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: is that the correct place for packaging docs? | 09:49 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: then of course lintian complained a lot so I made ajustments for lintian | 09:50 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: It is. I suggest that you reread https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Basic#control. | 09:50 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant:ok. will do. Then I will re-submit. | 09:50 |
| === Adri2000_ is now known as Adri2000 | ||
| tommytomtom | wgrant: right away I see a problem with the documentation. it says "Architecture: any" and I tried with that and it did not work. I had to change to "Architecture: all" | 09:53 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: Either is OK. | 09:53 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: Look at the list of fields just below. | 09:53 |
| wgrant | That 'any' didn't work for you is because of larger problems with your control file. Check the explanations of each value to work out which you need. | 09:54 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: ok... working... | 09:54 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: Ok. recompiled everything with both dpkg-buildpackage -S and debuild -S . I used both because dpkg-buildpackage did not create the .asc file. debuild worked fine but it gave some errors http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/345245/ could you please check to see if the errors are "ignorable" | 10:12 |
| wgrant | E: lazy8ledger source: no-architecture-field | 10:14 |
| wgrant | E: lazy8ledger source: package-uses-debhelper-but-lacks-build-depends | 10:14 |
| wgrant | W: lazy8ledger source: package-lacks-versioned-build-depends-on-debhelper 7 | 10:14 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: I know, I dont get it either. What is wrong?? | 10:14 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: lintian -Iiv lazy8ledger_2.24-0ubuntu1_source.changes | 10:15 |
| tommytomtom | Ok. If I add debhelper to the build depends.. | 10:15 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: If you run lintian like that, it will give you more verbose explanations. | 10:16 |
| wgrant | But this discussion is probably better suited to #ubuntu-motu, now that the Soyuz bug has been identified. | 10:16 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: looks much better now. I just get a warning on a watch file. Do most packages have a watch file??? | 10:38 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: They should, but it's not critical. | 10:43 |
| tommytomtom | wgrant: where is info on how to do watch files? | 10:43 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/PackagingGuide/Recipes/DebianWatch | 10:45 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| tommytomtom | wgrant,al-maisan,noodles775: YES! it uploaded. Thanks to all. | 11:02 |
| al-maisan | tommytomtom: glad it worked out for you in the end :) | 11:02 |
| wgrant | tommytomtom: Excellent. | 11:03 |
| noodles775 | Great work tommytomtom ! | 11:24 |
| === jtv is now known as jtv-eat | ||
| === jtv-eat is now known as jtv | ||
| Viper550 | I got some code I'm trying to push up, I'm on Windows | 13:57 |
| === ChrisMorganPi is now known as ChrisMorgan | ||
| t__ | hello? | 14:26 |
| intellectronica | t__: yes? | 14:28 |
| === ChrisMorgan is now known as ChrisMorgan|Away | ||
| t__ | I have a problem with launchpad | 14:30 |
| t__ | Are you still there? Iḿ new to IRC. (actually just installed it to get some help on launchpad) | 14:33 |
| salgado | t__, what's up? | 14:37 |
| t__ | My personal information is on the mailarchive | 14:37 |
| t__ | A webmaster from launchpad has to mail the mailarchive to remove it | 14:37 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| === harry is now known as Guest26922 | ||
| Guest26922 | When trying to push a branch to Launchpad with 'bzr push lp:~hrickards/phpcrypto/trunk' I get bzr: ERROR: Cannot lock LockDir(lp-64802192:///~hrickards/phpcrypto/trunk/.bzr/branchlock): Transport operation not possible: readonly transport . I've set bzr whoami to 'Harry Rickards <harry@linux.com' and bzr launchpad-login to hrickards. Anyone know what I'm doing wrong? | 15:06 |
| Guest26922 | If I 'ssh hrickards@bazaar.launchpad.net' authentication seems to work fine (I get 'No shells on this server') | 15:07 |
| === sraps_ is now known as sraps | ||
| beuno | Guest26922, you probably don't have your launchpad-login set | 15:10 |
| beuno | uhm | 15:10 |
| beuno | you have | 15:10 |
| Guest26922 | beuno: Yeah | 15:10 |
| beuno | how odd | 15:11 |
| beuno | try: | 15:11 |
| beuno | bzr push bzr+ssh://bazaar.launchpad.net/~hrickards/phpcrypto/trunk | 15:11 |
| Guest26922 | No - I get exactly the same error | 15:12 |
| beuno | now that is a new one for me | 15:12 |
| beuno | rockstar, around? | 15:12 |
| beuno | Guest26922, does break-lock give you the same error? | 15:13 |
| beuno | aha! | 15:14 |
| beuno | I know :) | 15:14 |
| beuno | it's an import | 15:14 |
| Guest26922 | beuno Just 'bzr break-lock'. No it returns nothing | 15:14 |
| beuno | Guest26922, do you want the import to continue? or was this a one time thing? | 15:15 |
| beuno | you can | 15:15 |
| beuno | can't write to imports | 15:15 |
| Guest26922 | beuno: Ah, I see. No, it was just a one time thing. How do I stop it? | 15:15 |
| beuno | Guest26922, just push a new branch to a new location | 15:15 |
| beuno | delete the current branch | 15:15 |
| beuno | well | 15:16 |
| beuno | start by deleting the existing branch | 15:16 |
| beuno | then push to the same location | 15:16 |
| beuno | I think that should do it | 15:16 |
| beuno | (this is confusing, btw, there's a bug here about usability) | 15:16 |
| * beuno nudges jelmer | 15:16 | |
| Guest26922 | beuno: Thanks! That did it | 15:17 |
| beuno | Guest26922, happy to hear that | 15:17 |
| jelmer | beuno: hi | 15:18 |
| === jon is now known as Guest47726 | ||
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| cjohnston | if I deactivated the mailing list for my team, will the mailing list info go away on the LP page? | 15:38 |
| === beuno is now known as beuno-lunch | ||
| === jamalta_ is now known as jamalta | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === beuno-lunch is now known as beuno | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === salgado-afk is now known as salgado | ||
| zekopeko_ | hi | 18:40 |
| zekopeko_ | how can i stop new bugs/blueprints/translations being reported in a project? we did some reshuffling so the bugs are now being reported on another page | 18:41 |
| zekopeko_ | i want to keep the old ones | 18:41 |
| zekopeko_ | bugs/bluepr./trans. thatis | 18:42 |
| zekopeko_ | ok figured it out | 18:44 |
| zekopeko_ | is there a simple way to copy a bug from one project to another? | 19:01 |
| beuno | zekopeko_, you can either move the bug | 19:02 |
| beuno | or mark it as also affecting the other project | 19:02 |
| zekopeko_ | how to move the bug? | 19:03 |
| beuno | zekopeko_, click on the edit icon next to the projects' name on the bugtask | 19:03 |
| beuno | (the yellow block) | 19:03 |
| zekopeko_ | under affects? | 19:04 |
| beuno | yes | 19:04 |
| zekopeko_ | ok | 19:04 |
| zekopeko_ | what next? | 19:05 |
| beuno | that should be it | 19:05 |
| zekopeko_ | i don't see anything that says move | 19:06 |
| zekopeko_ | or similar | 19:06 |
| beuno | zekopeko_, when you click on that | 19:07 |
| zekopeko_ | beuno, http://dl.dropbox.com/u/185055/Screenshot.png | 19:07 |
| beuno | you punch in the project you want to re-assign it to | 19:07 |
| playya__ | hi | 19:07 |
| beuno | zekopeko_, no, click on the yellow icon next to "Gloobus" | 19:07 |
| playya__ | i want to reactivate my pgp key becausehas expired | 19:08 |
| zekopeko_ | i still get the same options but on it's own page | 19:08 |
| playya__ | i updated the key and used send-keys to upload it, but launchpad still doesn't accept it | 19:09 |
| zekopeko_ | beuno, http://dl.dropbox.com/u/185055/Screenshot1.png | 19:10 |
| playya__ | maybe i just have to wail longer until lp syncs the keys? | 19:10 |
| zekopeko_ | ^ thats what I see if i click the little icon next to gloobus | 19:10 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| === cjohnston is now known as FFEMTcJ | ||
| === FFEMTcJ is now known as cjohnston | ||
| lfaraone | Where should I put the bzr branch of a package in LP if I'm the upstream maintainer in Debian and I want to use bzr-bd to build my package? | 20:23 |
| lfaraone | (where is correct, I mean) | 20:23 |
| nkinkade | Hi all. Just to be sure I'm not totally missing something in the docs, exporting to an upstream repository from is limited to upstream bazaar repository, correct? | 21:32 |
| wgrant | nkinkade: That's right. | 21:33 |
| nkinkade | wgrant: Thanks for verifying. | 21:33 |
| wgrant | Although you could probably use bzr-svn to push such a branch back up to a Subversion repository. | 21:33 |
| nkinkade | Yeah, I was looking at that, but it seems like a bit of back-bending to go svn -> Launchpad <-> bzr-svn -> svn ... or something like that. | 21:35 |
| nkinkade | Maybe not *too* bad, though. | 21:36 |
| wgrant | Launchpad will do a bzr-svn import for you. | 21:36 |
| nkinkade | I'll read up a bit more on bzr-svn. Thanks. | 21:37 |
| === playya__ is now known as playya | ||
| * wgrant awaits the filing of bug #500000 | 23:38 | |
| ubottu | Error: Launchpad bug 500000 could not be found | 23:38 |
| wgrant | THere we are. | 23:40 |
| wgrant | Bug #500000 | 23:40 |
| ubottu | Error: Launchpad bug 500000 could not be found | 23:40 |
| wgrant | Bug #500000 | 23:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 500000 in usplash "wrong aspect ratio boot splash on widescreen screen" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/500000 | 23:40 |
| RAOF | aaand it's a duplicate. | 23:43 |
| wgrant | Haha. | 23:43 |
| wgrant | 400000 suffered an automatic apport duplicate fate. | 23:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
