[00:21] ccheney: ping [00:38] james_w: hmm; why do the tags for Debian versions not get copied to the Ubuntu branch? [00:39] (wasn't this done previously? I patched submittodebian thinking it was the case, and apparently it stood up to at least /one/ of my tests...) [00:53] hi anyone know about ubuntu package for the spice protocol [00:53] hi anyone know about ubuntu package for the spice protocol [00:53] sorry for writing twice :( [00:59] marcosi: I've never even heard of a spice protocol; your question may be more appropriate for #ubuntu, but if you are referring to an /existing/ package, I think you should mention a package name [01:00] slangasek: any idea about the pbuilder-checkparams error in lucid? [01:00] using pbuilder-dist [01:00] nixternal: the aptitude assertion failure that was fixed last night? [01:00] hrmm [01:00] slangasek: www.spice-space.org [01:00] if not that one, then no, I don't know; I don't use pbuilder myself [01:01] pbuilder-checkparams: line 150: /dev/fd/62: No such file or directory [01:01] slangasek: redhat opened it, but i found there just .tar.gz [01:02] k, seems it is something with --logfile..I can disable that fo the time being [01:08] marcosi: ah; nope, not familiar with it and haven't heard of anyone working on packaging it for Ubuntu. You can file a bug against Ubuntu using the "needs-packaging" tag to request it === nhandler_ is now known as nhandler [02:23] Keybuk: /dev/fd/62 - this is an error some of us on lucid are getting when running pbuilder...I don't think it is related to pbuilder because, well google kind of says so...I am wondering if any of your recent changes (mountall or util-linux) might be causing this? [02:23] /dev/fd/62 as in no such file or directory error [02:28] nixternal: yeah I saw that [02:28] nixternal: cd /dev; MAKEDEV fd [02:28] cheater! [02:28] haha [02:28] no, that's the fix [02:29] well I used that as a work around :) [02:29] hrmm [02:29] on my other box, i get '.udevdb or .udev implies active udev. Aboring MAKEDEV invocation' [02:33] yeah, needs to go in /etc/init/mounted-dev.conf [02:33] ahhh [02:33] right as you said it I saw that [02:35] exec /sbin/MAKEDEV std console fd ppp tun [02:35] that is there now, only console and ppp are being created [02:35] no, you misunderstand [02:35] that line isn't being run at all [02:36] because /dev is not a tmpfs [02:36] ahhhh [02:36] gotcha now, thanks [02:36] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/lucid/mountall/lucid/revision/252 [02:42] Keybuk: just tested those changes, still didn't work [03:15] keybuk, nixternal: Yeah, MAKEDEV seems to quit before doing anything (including the fd action) if .udevdb or .udev exist. [03:15] there is a /dev/.udev [03:19] yeah probably one held over from the initramfs [03:19] can probably just remove that check from MAKEDEV :) [03:25] keybuk: Btw, about http://people.canonical.com/~scott/daily-bootcharts/ again, how about e.g. 1px thin rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.5) lines at budget times? They shouldn’t interfere too much. [03:25] they do make it noisy === abms1116 is now known as abms1116|away [06:43] shtylman: pong, sorry for slow response [07:01] * ccheney heads to bed === abms1116|away is now known as abms1116 === abms1116 is now known as abms1116|away === abms1116|away is now known as abms1116 === hunger_t is now known as hunger === mac_v is now known as \vish [18:00] Hi all [18:00] I was wondering (in karmic) what determines if the jockey-gtk list is populated or not? [18:01] I used to think installing linux-restricted-modules helped but this isn't even a package in karmic anymore [18:16] keybuk: I wonder if there would be a speed benefit in nautilus not painting the desktop background twice (to the root window and to the desktop window) but instead painting the wallpaper to the root window once and painting the desktop window with alpha=0 if composite is available? [18:17] ion: we've been talking about doing that for years [18:18] there are even nautilus patches to do it somewhere === yofel_ is now known as yofel === \vish is now known as mac_v [19:59] asac, fta: are we going to get dh_xulrunner in xulrunner-dev for lucid? I think that would let us get ruby-gnome2 in sync, for starters [20:09] slangasek: bug 498973, I'm going to mark wishlist triaged [20:09] Launchpad bug 498973 in xulrunner-1.9.1 "xulrunner-dev should provide dh_xulrunner" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498973 [20:11] micahg: cheers [20:11] slangasek: asac's basically out till next week, I'll poke him about it then [20:12] yes, I wasn't expecting a terribly timely answer right now :) [20:14] why does vmbuilder hate me so? [20:15] Santa baby, I've been an awfully good goy. So why ... does vmbuilder hate me so? It's slow ... and usually lags my machine. It's mean ... can't we get an upgrade. And paid .. by sabdfl. [20:15] (sorry Eartha Kitt) [20:16] rofl === mac_v is now known as \vish [21:06] why is inotify-tools 3.13-2 not in ubuntu? [21:07] do I need to do a sync request? [21:07] oh, duh, it's not in debian testing, nevermind. [21:10] Ryan52: if you think it's worth to get 3.13-2 it's possible to sync it from unstable (-> sync request) [21:11] geser: it'll be in testing in 10 days anyway, I'm about to upload a fix for the bug that's keeping it out of testing. [21:11] is it possible to print out a string that matches a regexp using sed? (not the whole input, just what was matched) [21:12] unimatrix: just the lines that match, or the part of the lines that match? [21:12] Ryan52: part of the lines [21:13] unimatrix: not sure of the correct way, tho I'd just do this: sed -r 's/.*(regexp).*/\1/' [21:14] (if that's possible in your situation) [21:14] i've tried but it throws out "invalid reference \1 on `s' command's RHS" [21:14] unimatrix: add the -r [21:15] i did [21:15] what's your exact command? [21:16] echo "this is just a test" | sed -r 's/just/\1/' [21:16] unimatrix: echo "this is just a test" | sed -r 's/.*(just).*/\1/' [21:17] oh hey that worked [21:17] thanks a lot :) [21:17] exactly ;) [21:17] np