[02:00] <bjsnider> why would the ppa build system complain that a header is not there when it is?
[02:03] <wgrant> bjsnider: The PPA build system is not doing that.
[02:03] <wgrant> It doesn't know about headers.
[02:04] <bjsnider> /usr/include/gjs-1.0/gjs/importer.h:33:19: error: jsapi.h: No such file or directory
[02:05] <bjsnider> jsapi.h is definitely in there
[02:05] <wgrant> That's your package's build system.
[03:11]  * shriekout $decode(s60gwKe068fRILDHtOPAzLTZISEhDQpuaWNrILDHtOMNCnF1aXQgOrDHtOMgx9ewocfXsKE=,m)
[03:11] <shriekout> sorry
[14:06] <etali> Hi, I'm trying to learn packaging, I'm starting by fixing dependencies for some of the stuff listed on http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/debcheck - where would I submit a diff I've made so that it can be checked over?  (I did something for iceweasel-downloadstatusbar but there's no bug report to attach it to or anything I can see).
[14:07] <jbicha> make your own bug report and attach the patch
[14:08] <etali> Ah, cool, thanks.
[14:14] <etali> OK, bug 500779.  I subscribed ubuntu-universe-sponsors.  Hope everything is correct!
[15:07] <geser> etali: could you please also provide a debdiff?
[15:07] <geser> a debdiff makes it easier to check your changes
[15:09] <geser> and in the case of firefox addons, you should perhaps also talk to the firefox maintainers, as they know better what changes are needed
[15:10] <geser> I doubt that firefox will look in /usr/share/iceweasel for possible addons
[15:12] <hyperair> hmmm should i just copy the endorsements from my uuc application to my motu application, or should i get new ones?
[15:13] <geser> new ones
[15:13] <hyperair> new ones eh..
[15:13] <hyperair> okay
[15:13] <hyperair> must they be by different people?
[15:14] <geser> no, they might come from the same sponsors (and it's up to them if they write something new or copy the old statement)
[15:14] <hyperair> ah
[15:14] <hyperair> right
[15:14] <etali1> geser: thanks - I'll check what else needs changed then upload a debdiff
[15:15] <geser> etali1: and you should target lucid (and not karmic) in your changelog
[15:16] <etali1> This might be a silly question, but is it OK to target lucid when I'm building on Karmic?
[15:17] <hyperair> well you acn always use pbuilder to build in lucid
[15:17] <hyperair> i mean build for lucid in karmic
[15:17] <Laney> (should)
[15:17] <hyperair> you could also use cowbuilder like i do
[15:17] <hyperair> right
[15:17] <hyperair> should
[15:18] <geser> etali: the target is only important for uploads (e.g. to the archive or your PPA), so it doesn't matter during build.
[15:19] <etali> geser: ah, cool, thanks
[15:19] <geser> you can build the package on karmic (for karmic) to check it your changes are enough or on karmic for lucid to test if it builds (for lucid)
[15:19] <etali> hyperair: is there somewhere I can read about cowbuilder?  I can't see a wiki page for it?
[15:19] <Laney> it has the same interface as pbuilder
[15:20] <hyperair> etali: there's a manpage.
[15:20] <hyperair> etali: install cowbuilder and then man cowbuilder
[15:20] <hyperair> or yelp man:cowbuilder if you feel better reading from a web-like interface
[15:22] <etali> hyperair: OK, thanks!  I reflexively check the wiki for everything - I usually read up on stuff while I'm working on my Windows machine.
[15:22] <hyperair> etali: aah
[15:22] <hyperair> well google for cowbuilder manpage
[15:22] <hyperair> i'm sure it's around somewhere
[15:22] <geser> http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/karmic/en/man8/cowbuilder.8.html :)
[15:23] <etali> geser: thanks :)
[15:24] <etali> I'll make the suggested changes, check with the mozilla guys, and try again :)
[15:25] <geser> iirc they have an own channel, but I don't remember the name anymore
[15:25] <etali> I think it's #ubuntu-mozillateam - will find out soon, just about to ask them.
[15:25] <geser> sounds right
[15:45] <bjsnider> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+package/gobject-introspection-repository
[15:45] <bjsnider> does that package exist in lucid or not?
[15:45] <hyperair> is gstreamer0.10-fluendo-mp3 legal to install in all countries?
[16:02] <geser> bjsnider: no
[16:04] <bjsnider> geser, i see, it says "deleted" because it has been superseded by debian gir1 packages
[16:05] <bjsnider> in the control file's build-deps list, it's possible to do package | package, but is it possible to do package | package and package?
[16:05] <geser> bjsnider: you want "pkg1 | (pkg2 and pkg3)"
[16:06] <bjsnider> geser, absolutely
[16:06] <bjsnider> if possible
[16:06] <geser> try "pkg1 | pkg2, pkg1 | pkg3"
[16:07] <bjsnider> so i'm listing pkg1 twice
[16:07] <bjsnider> that way you could design a control file that would work across at least 2 distros
[16:25] <Shizuo> azeem: I have a debian question
[16:26] <Shizuo> Hey there, Sarvatt
[16:32] <ScottK> Your odds of getting an answer go up if you actually ask the question.
[16:33] <Shizuo> ScottK: wHAT?
[16:33] <ScottK> Shizuo: You said you have a question, but you didn't ask it.  It's impossible to answer an unasked question.
[16:33] <Shizuo> ScottK: You are correct
[16:34] <ScottK> So go ahead and ask the question.
[16:35] <Shizuo> I am glad we talked
[16:35] <Shizuo> Thanks for all your help
[16:39] <Shizuo> ScottK: There is no need to be shy
[18:33] <hyperair> do i need to g_object_unref my GFile*s gotten from g_file_new_from_uri?
[18:45] <Quintasan> nixternal or persia: can you add me to REVU as a reviewer or I need to do some sort of application first?
[19:00] <and`> Quintasan: a ping on IRC is enough, no applications required :)
[19:06] <stedy> hello, could sombody assist me whit a basic pbuild question? making a deb package and get a error saying http://paste.ubuntu.com/345558 how could i bypass this one?
[19:06] <stedy> hmm im a newbee so... http://paste.ubuntu.com/347713/ thats minidlna's make file
[19:07] <geser> stedy: try PREFIX=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp before make install in your rules file
[19:17] <stedy> PREFIX=$(CURDIR)/debian/tmp added to upstream make file gave sucess :) thx a lot!! . but could my rules file be wrong? http://paste.ubuntu.com/347723/
[20:19] <Quintasan> uhh, damn isp
[20:20] <Quintasan> and`: thanks, I was worried that I will have to go through a second questioning session ;P
[20:20] <and`> Quintasan: nah, you're lucky this time
[20:21] <Quintasan> :D
[21:52] <stedy> geser: i now got pbuild to run without error but, the binarys is not whitin the deb file..
[21:56] <persia> Quintasan: You're now a reviewer
[21:58] <persia> Quintasan: Also, for REVU, the set of admins to ask about stuff is listed at http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/stats
[23:03] <emet> hey
[23:04] <emet> the package wine recommends winbind, why ?
[23:14] <emet> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/500880
[23:30] <Quintasan> persia: Thank you :)