/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2009/12/28/#ubuntu+1.txt

BUGabundosmplayer was broken for me in lucid00:00
billybigrigger_won't need anything else00:00
billybigrigger_smplayer works great here00:00
bjsniderbillybigrigger, no, gmplayer is an old gui that is no longer maintained00:00
billybigrigger_bjsnider, i was going to say, gmplayer sucked00:00
billybigrigger_will have to try gnome-mplayer00:00
yoasifgnome-mplayer is pretty horrible heh00:00
BUGabundobillybigrigger don't00:00
yoasifbillybigrigger_: maybe you can figure out how to make good bug reports for that app heh00:01
BUGabundototem, vlc, mplauer and smppayer are enoufh00:01
yoasiftotem has slooooooow startup00:01
BUGabundono00:01
BUGabundovery fast here00:01
BUGabundofaster then vlc00:01
BUGabundomplayer beats all, of course00:01
yoasifi just use mplayer-nogui00:01
Sarvattyoasif: try something like mplayer -ao pulse -vo vdpau -vc ffh264vdpau file manually?00:01
Sarvattyou can use mplayer -identify -vo vdpau -frames 0 file to dump the info btw00:02
yoasifSarvatt: just tried that, now i get no video, but i hear the audio00:02
Sarvattdoes it have subtitles?00:03
Sarvattit might be non-comformant and vdpau might not accelerate it00:03
yoasifno subs00:03
bjsnideryoasif, does it work if you use xv and the normal ffmpeg codecs?00:04
yoasifbjsnider: when i try ffmpeg i get Forced video codec: ffmpeg00:05
yoasifCannot find codec matching selected -vo and video format 0x31637661.00:05
bjsniderthe codec should be ffh264 i think00:06
yoasifbjsnider: yes, it works with ffh26400:06
bjsniderwithout any of those error messages?00:07
Sarvatti had to reencode alot of my old hd rips to get them to work with gpu acceleration, it's made for standardized profiles that come on hd-dvd and blurays and stuff so its easy to encode your own stuff out of spec00:07
yoasifbjsnider: yes, without the error messages00:08
yoasifSarvatt: ahh :/00:08
yoasifSarvatt: so i may just be SOL?00:08
bjsnideryoasif, are you using the latest vdpau? where did you get it?00:08
yoasifbjsnider: i used the vdpau ppa00:08
yoasifstill using 185 though00:09
bjsniderah, well that could be the issue00:09
yoasifi can downgrade to the lucid versions, but those have the same issue00:10
billybigriggeryoasif, did you get a sample hosted somewhere for one of us to test?00:10
yoasifbillybigrigger: still opening it in avidemux heh00:11
bjsnideryou can upgrade to the 190 or 195 driver which has numerous vdpau fixes since the 18500:11
yoasifbjsnider: i had major issues even trying to install those via ppa... ie it didn't work at all :/00:12
bjsniderwhen was this?00:12
yoasifand i don't want to install using the nvidia installer00:12
yoasiflike 4 days ago?00:12
yoasifi can try again if you recommend it00:12
billybigriggeryoasif, install nvidia-195-glx00:12
bjsniderwhat day is this anyway?00:12
billybigriggersunday00:12
bjsniderwhat year is this?00:13
billybigriggerbjsnider, thanks for the nvidia help earlier btw00:13
billybigrigger200900:13
bjsniderwhat planet am i on?00:13
billybigriggermars00:13
bjsniderthought so00:13
bjsniderwait, the 185 works in lucid?00:13
yoasifbjsnider: yeah00:15
bjsniderover time, vdpau has gotten more and more tolerant of badly encoded crap00:15
yoasifbjsnider: it's actually the only driver that worked for me, but i will try 195 in a few00:16
bjsniderjust upload a clip so i can test it00:16
bjsniderbecause i'll tell you what, you could submit it to stephen warren for testing too00:16
yoasifyea i will upload a clip as soon as i can get a few second sample00:17
yoasifavidemux is still indexing the file heh00:17
billybigriggerwill vlc play it? i think you can save samples through vlc00:17
yoasifbillybigrigger: yeah it does play it00:18
yoasifhow can i do that?00:18
billybigriggeri think im full of it00:19
yoasifnp00:20
bjsnideryou can do it in mkvmerge00:25
bjsniderstart a new encode, but stop it after 10 seconds or so00:26
bjsniderkeep everything default but change the name so it doesn't overwrite the original00:26
billybigriggerffmpeg should be able to aswell00:27
Sarvattyoasif: where did you get the mplayer from? was it compiled against the vdpau in nvidia's 185 driver or libvdpau?00:34
yoasifSarvatt: lemme check00:37
yoasifSarvatt: lucid multiverse00:37
SarvattNVIDIA: could not open the device file /dev/nvidiactl (Permission denied).00:37
yoasifInstalled: 2:1.0~rc3+svn20090426-1ubuntu1200:37
bjsniderwhat?00:37
bjsnideraren't you using the nvidia-vdpau ppa?00:38
yoasifbjsnider: i was, and then after i got the nvidia driver working, i downgraded everything because i never actually got it working when using the ppa00:38
bjsniderSarvatt, add yourself to the video group00:38
Sarvattthere ya go yeah00:38
Sarvattthats in his log00:39
bjsnideryoasif, you downgraded everything except the driver?00:39
yoasifbjsnider: lemme check that too...yeah00:40
yoasif185.18.36-0ubuntu10~lucid~nvidiavdpauppa100:40
bjsnideryou need libvdpau and the mplayer from the ppa00:41
bjsniderlibvdpau should already be there00:41
yoasifalright -- well it never worked with just plain lucid either00:41
yoasifbut i should go ahead and switch to the vdpau ppa?00:41
Sarvattyeah mplayer in ubuntu doesnt have vdpau support :D00:41
bjsnideryes it does00:41
yoasifyeah it does00:42
yoasifit has since karmic00:42
bjsniderit's just old00:42
yoasifheh00:42
bjsniderreally, really old00:42
bjsnideryoasif, you can downgrade if anything bad happens00:43
Sarvattoh vdpau support was added in october, no wonder i missed it00:49
bjsniderit's much older than that00:50
bjsniderthe mplayer pull happened in april00:50
yoasifbjsnider: yea ill give it a shot in a few00:50
bjsniderprobably using even older vdpau code00:50
bjsnideryoasif, i was changing the ppa over to new stuff last week, so maybe you got caught during one of the broken packages. but they all work now, as far as i know00:51
Sarvattyeah but it wasnt using  vdpau when I looked last, was just enabled on september 24th   * Enable VDPAU support by including vdpau headers in deb packaging.00:51
bjsniderwhich isn't necessary anymore since the library is built separately from the blob now00:51
Sarvatthmm http://osdir.com/ml/debian-bugs-dist/2009-11/msg08681.html00:55
Sarvattlooks like its not falling back to another vo if theres a problem with the way its done now, and just doesnt display the video00:56
htrejhhi00:57
htrejhhow can i update to +1 in kubuntu?00:57
bjsniderSarvatt, in mplayer00:58
htrejhas update-manager -d doesn't work00:59
penguin42htrejh: I did a do-release-upgrade -d01:01
htrejhk thanks it was that, couldn't remember01:01
htrejhthx bye01:02
Sarvattbjsnider: did you binary copy the mplayer in nvidia-vdpau to lucid or something? its compiled with gcc 4.4.101:04
bjsniderlet me check01:05
bjsnideri'm trying to remember01:05
bjsnideryes i did01:05
Sarvattyoasif: its playing fine here01:06
Sarvatti'm using 195.30 straight from nvidia though01:07
bjsniderbasically at that point in time the queue times int he build system were so long that it seemed practical01:07
Sarvattno i'm not actually -- nvidia-195-kernel-source                        195.30-0ubuntu1~lucid~nvidiavdpauppa101:07
bjsniderwhere is the clip?01:08
=== Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth
Sarvattyoasif: http://pastebin.com/dc86508b01:09
Sarvattit's an 8gb "clip" :D01:09
Sarvattdid you binary copy nvidia-settings too or something?01:11
bjsniderhe just needs to update to the packages in the ppa and he'll be fine01:11
Sarvattbecause that doesnt compile against libxxf86vm-dev anymore01:11
* bjsnider runs and hides01:11
bjsnideri promise the drivers are not binary copied01:12
Sarvattthey wouldnt work if they were :D01:12
bjsniderno, because they would end up providing the wrong xorg-video package01:13
bjsniderwhich i think is the problem with the one in the current lucid repo01:14
Sarvattdynamic gamma adjusting probably wont work with the binary copied nvidia-settings from karmic though01:15
* penguin42 wonders what level of open source radeon drivers will ship in Lucid; I'm pretty impressed with the current bleeding edge set01:16
Sarvatti wish it was just that, recompiling 185 doesnt work here01:16
Sarvattpenguin42: the ones in lucid now will probably be there for a good chunk of time still, thats the last git checkout that works without updating other major plumbing01:17
penguin42Sarvatt: Does it get GL working on most stuff?01:18
bjsnideri get the impression major plumbing will be required for gnome-shell to be updated too, since i can't get it to build here01:18
Sarvattnext commit made it require libdrm 2.4.16 and current git needs 2.4.17, not to mention mesa needs 2.4.17 to get updated as well01:18
penguin42Sarvatt: It might be worth it you know - it's working like a dream01:18
Sarvattgnome-shell builds fine here in jhbuild against lucid? i built it yesterday01:18
bjsnideri'm talking about a deb though01:19
cjohnstonI hope someone knows this... Do md5 hashes normally get posted on https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuHashes for alpha/beta releases?01:19
Sarvattpenguin42: updating libdrm horribly breaks intel for alot of people01:20
penguin42Sarvatt: Ah that wouldn't be good01:20
* Sarvatt raises his hand :D01:20
Sarvattthats whats holding it back01:20
penguin42Sarvatt: So I've now got one Intel machine and one Radeon!01:20
penguin42curious, synergy from my intrepid box to my karmic box if I type an @ sign I get an Ω01:25
Sarvattwhat keyboard layout are you using?01:27
penguin42UK on both (102 maybe on one, 105 on the other - but that's just the windows keys difference)01:28
penguin42the key in question is the same one on both - shift ' - i.e. where " is on US keyboards01:28
yoasifany ideas on this error?01:30
Sarvattlooks like synergy is pretty broken for everything but US layouts from a quick glance01:30
yoasifdpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nvidia-glx-195_195.30-0ubuntu1~lucid~nvidiavdpauppa1_amd64.deb (--unpack):01:30
yoasif subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 201:30
yoasifErrors were encountered while processing:01:30
yoasif /var/cache/apt/archives/nvidia-glx-195_195.30-0ubuntu1~lucid~nvidiavdpauppa1_amd64.deb01:30
yoasifE: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)01:30
yoasifA package failed to install.  Trying to recover:01:30
yoasifSetting up nvidia-195-kernel-source (195.30-0ubuntu1~lucid~nvidiavdpauppa1) ...01:30
bjsniderpastebin the full error msg01:31
Sarvattpurge your nvidia stuff besides nvidia-common before ya switch yoasif, one of the downsides of using ppa's for it01:31
yoasifis there a log?01:32
yoasifok01:32
Sarvattits has horribly complex packaging and people do it different on ppa's01:32
yoasifpurging now01:32
bjsnider"horribly complex" is putting id mildly01:33
Sarvatti just purge nvidia* then reinstall nvidia-common01:33
bjsnideralberto's trying to clean it up01:33
Sarvattyeah I spent a good 2 days trying to fix it up before i gave up, its just too limited how its set up now01:33
bjsniderSarvatt, is tehre a replacement package in lucid for the one you mentioned re: nvidia-settings?01:34
Sarvattyepyep nvidia-graphics-drivers instead of having to changing hundreds of things to switch from a major version bump nvidia does every few months will be NICE01:34
bjsniderwell, using one or two files with version numbers and then variables for the rest would be helpful01:35
yoasifhttp://pastebin.com/m4dab7aad01:36
Sarvattx headers got split up alot between protos and lib-dev's now so one can have client side and the other have server side things, ya want to add x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev as well to the deps but you need to change one of the source files to point at the new header name too, one sec01:36
bjsniderit's a deiversion clash. those diversions are supposed to be REMOVED when you uninstall the previous version01:37
Sarvatthttp://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28974401:37
yoasifgot rid of the diversion clash i think01:37
ubottubugs.gentoo.org bug 289744 in Applications "nvidia-settings-190.40 does not compile w/ libXxf86vm-1.1.0 (patch included)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]01:37
Sarvattpatch is attached there01:37
bjsnidergentoo?01:38
bjsnideroh, no. i can't add a gentoo patch01:38
bjsniderthat's out of the question01:38
yoasifhttp://pastebin.com/m41f6fd5b01:38
Sarvatthttp://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=20892601:38
Sarvattthe blob already has a few gentoo patches in it! :D01:38
yoasifdpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/nvidia-glx-195_195.30-0ubuntu1~lucid~nvidiavdpauppa1_amd64.deb (--unpack):01:38
yoasifwhat is the issue there?01:38
bjsniderthe diversion01:39
yoasifwhat should i do?01:39
bjsniderdiversions are ont heir way out. it's going to be alternatives instead01:39
bjsniderpurge all nvidia drivers01:39
yoasifdid that heh01:39
yoasifill do it again01:39
bjsnidertry to reinstall the 195 driver01:39
bjsnideryou might have to purge the mesa stuff too01:40
yoasifall of mesa?01:40
bjsnideras much as you can get01:41
Sarvattpackaging is probably sketchy in the 185 package you used01:41
Sarvattyoasif: sudo nano /var/lib/dpkg/diversions01:41
Sarvatterr purge the nvidia stuff first01:41
Sarvattthen do that, and manually delete all the nvidia stuff01:41
brianHey guys. Where is a good listing of the major features/changes/enhancements to Lucid?01:42
Sarvatti used one of that sevenmachine persons blobs once and got left with a ton of dangling diversions i had to manually delete too01:42
yoasifahh shit01:43
yoasifdpkg: unrecoverable fatal error, aborting:01:43
yoasif unexpected eof reading `/var/lib/dpkg/diversions'01:43
Sarvattgo to the last line and hit enter?01:43
yoasiftried that01:43
Sarvattthere more than one newline at the end?01:44
Sarvattshouldnt be able to go down more than one01:44
bjsniderdpkg-divert --remove --rename --package nvidia-glx-185 --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.xlibmesa /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 > /dev/null01:44
yoasifjust one newline at the end01:44
bjsniderthat's in the postrm script here01:44
yoasifahh maybe someone should pastebin their diversions file01:45
yoasifbjsnider: that script didnnt work01:45
bjsnidertry running the command i just posted01:45
Sarvattya should have a diversions-old you can use as a reference01:45
yoasifah great01:45
yoasifmving it01:45
Sarvattwouldnt move it, just meant to see what ya screwed up lol01:46
yoasifhehe cping01:46
bjsnidermaybe the diversions file was broken and that's why the script didn't work01:46
Sarvattpastebin your diversions and diversions-old yoasif?01:46
Sarvattor did ya already overwrite it lol01:47
yoasifalready gone :/01:47
bjsniderdoesn't matter. he'll just add new diversions when he installs the 195 driver01:47
Sarvattits probably ok, last package that made it write the -old one was the 195 anyway01:47
yoasifstill getting the old diversion error01:47
yoasifdpkg-divert: `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa by nvidia-glx-195' clashes with `diversion of /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 to /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa by nvidia-glx-185'01:47
yoasifafter running the command bjsnider told me to try01:47
bjsniderno, that's different01:48
Sarvattyah theres more than just libGL01:48
bjsniderhold on01:48
bjsniderdpkg-divert --remove --rename --package nvidia-glx-185 --divert /usr/lib/nvidia/libGL.so.1.2.xlibmesa /usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2 > /dev/null01:48
yoasifafter the command, i get01:49
yoasifdpkg-divert: `diversion of /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so to /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so.xserver-xorg-core by nvidia-glx-195' clashes with `diversion of /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so to /usr/lib/nvidia/libglx.so.xserver-xorg-core by nvidia-glx-185'01:49
Sarvattprobably like 5 more01:49
bjsniderwe're going point by point right down the line01:49
bjsniderlet me post the script and you can run the commands01:49
yoasifsounds good01:49
Sarvattopen up your diversions again and replace the filenames :D01:49
yoasifid rather run bjsnider's script :p01:50
yoasifi screwed it up once already01:50
SarvattI bet ya just left the 2 lines above the package names at the top01:50
yoasifhehe, i don't really understand how the diversions file works otherwise id just do it manually01:51
bjsniderhttp://pastebin.com/d587c02ef01:52
Sarvatthttp://pastebin.com/d26858ad01:52
bjsniderthose are the commands you haven't run yet that are in the postrm script01:52
Sarvattwait01:52
Sarvattthats wrong?01:52
Sarvattrm -f /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.185.53 2> /dev/null01:53
Sarvattlooks like you just changed 190.53 to 185.53 there01:53
yoasifooh looks like it worked01:53
yoasifshould i reboot and see if it worked? lol01:53
Sarvattdont need to reboot01:54
Sarvatterr01:54
Sarvattunless you mean to see if 195 works01:54
Sarvattlol01:54
yoasifgdm restart?01:54
yoasifyeah haha01:54
Sarvattthought ya meant to see if the diversion removal worked sorry01:54
yoasifi could do gdm restart right01:54
yoasifyeah01:54
yoasifthat seems to have worked01:54
yoasifinstalled fine as far as i can tell01:54
bjsniderSarvatt, that definitely looks wrong01:54
Sarvattthats what was in the script ya posted01:55
yoasifgdm restarting, wish me luck :P01:55
bjsnidernow i have to update the driver again. thanks a lot01:55
Sarvattevil evil nvidia packaging lol01:55
bjsniderat least hardly anybody is using the 18501:55
Sarvattsomeone was saying they hoped i used sed to replace the hundreds of references to 185 to 190 when i was doing it01:55
Sarvattbut i couldnt for that exact reason01:55
bjsniderbut that's not what his problem was01:56
bjsnideri thinkt hat would leave an orphaned file behind but that's all01:56
Sarvattthere were other places it would have gotten caught up where it was alot worse than a dangling file getting left behind but i cant remember off the top of my head01:58
bjsniderwell, the control file for one01:58
bjsniderhis diversions file must have been unparseable or something01:59
Sarvatti think he left the 2 lines above the first nvidia-185-glx line02:00
Sarvattjust my guess :D02:00
yoasiftook a couple of restarts, but i am now running 19502:11
yoasifcompiz seems noticably faster02:11
yoasifbjsnider: Sarvatt, the file works now! :)02:13
bjsniderit's amazing what newer code will do for you02:13
yoasifvery much so02:14
bjsnidercheck something for me02:14
yoasifthanks for the help with the diversions... if it wasnt for that i wouldnt have been able to install the 195 drivr02:14
bjsnider/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so.185.18.3602:15
bjsnideris that file on your system?02:15
yoasifbjsnider: no02:15
bjsniderhahaha02:15
bjsniderwhatever02:15
bjsniderwhatever dude02:15
Sarvattlol02:15
yoasifi ran all the commands that you pastebin'd02:15
yoasiflol02:15
yoasifmaybe one of the rms did it?02:15
yoasifremoved it i mean02:16
bjsniderok, i'm not updating the driver because that line doesn't need to be there02:16
bjsnideryoasif, no, the package itself removed it02:16
yoasifah ok02:16
yoasifwell, that was a crazy issue heh02:16
bjsnideri think your diversions file was corrupted and unparseable02:17
yoasifalso, there is an issue with the nvidia drivers or something because it takes two restarts to activate the driver02:17
yoasifon my box anyway02:17
bjsniderso the postrm script couldn't do its work02:17
yoasifoh, i have one other REALLY nasty issue02:18
yoasifmaybe you guys will have some ideas02:18
Sarvattit probably deletes libglx.so.* in the preinst for the new driver, but i'm sure it'd leave the file dangling if someone removed 185 to switch to nouveau02:18
bjsniderlots of people have told me that it took two restarts to activate the new driver02:18
yoasifgdm sometimes lets me into my account without entering a password02:18
yoasifi think it goes something like this... logout, click my username, hit cancel, click username again, and im in my account02:19
yoasif(my account is set for auto login, but i don't think that is supposed to happen)02:19
Sarvattyeah theres a bug with logins right now since about 12-2202:19
yoasifok, well as long as it is known i guess02:19
yoasifi filed one but it got closed as invalid02:19
Sarvattgnome livecd's dont even work :D02:20
yoasifbut there wasnt much information i guess... probably should have been incomplete02:20
yoasiflol...02:20
bjsnider!info libxvidcore402:22
ubottulibxvidcore4 (source: xvidcore): An open source MPEG-4 video codec (library). In component multiverse, is optional. Version 2:1.2.2+debian-0ubuntu1 (lucid), package size 249 kB, installed size 764 kB02:22
bjsnider!info libxvidcore4-dev02:22
ubottulibxvidcore4-dev (source: xvidcore): High quality ISO MPEG4 codec library -- development files. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 2:1.1.2-0.1ubuntu4 (lucid), package size 257 kB, installed size 856 kB02:22
bjsniderversion mismatch02:22
bjsnidersorry Sarvatt can't rebuild mplayer for lucid right now02:22
Sarvatti have a feeling it wont build, was just about to look up the last time it was built in lucid02:24
yoasifbjsnider: so the vdpau ppa is safe to keep on?02:25
bjsnidersure is02:25
yoasifthe new nvidia driver is actually helping my compiz effects a lot02:26
bjsnidercompiz?02:27
bjsnideris that old thing still around?02:27
SarvattI know its your baby but realistically ya gotta expect there might be problems with the PPA drivers once tseliot updates nvidia in lucid :D02:27
yoasifbut lucid had regressed in my effects speed over karmic02:27
bjsniderSarvatt, i'll follow his updates02:27
yoasifbjsnider: what, are you using gnome shell?02:27
bjsnideryes i are02:28
yoasifhaha02:28
yoasifyeah, from my experience it is nice02:28
yoasifis there a ppa with newer code?02:28
* Sarvatt is using just plain mutter02:28
Sarvattall i need is fast gl transparency :D02:28
bjsnideri wanted to create one, but i can't get the blasted gnome-shell to build. mutter will though02:28
yoasifSarvatt: mutter is a wm?02:29
yoasifor is it like xcompmgr?02:29
Sarvattyeah mutter is metacity with a clutter compositing engine instead of xrender metacity uses pretty much02:34
yoasifi like my expo wall too much :P02:34
yoasifmain reason i switched away from openbox and came back to gnome :/02:34
yoasifinteresting, i have mutter installed02:38
yoasifis mutter the compositing replacement for metacity?02:38
bjsniderthat's about the size of it02:39
bjsnidermetacity + clutter02:40
Sarvattmetacity can do compositing too but its has a slow xrender based compositing backend, ya can use mutter --replace to try it02:44
Sarvatt(try just mutter out I mean, metacity -c --replace would enable metacity compositing)02:45
bjsniderso you're just using mutter without gnome-shell?02:46
bjsniderwait, ha, you can't do that02:46
bjsnideri just remembered02:46
yoasifSarvatt: im guessing it's really fast?02:47
Sarvattdepends what you mean fast :)02:47
yoasiffaster than compiz i guess02:48
Sarvattit slows down other 3D things the same as compiz does02:49
Sarvattnah if anything its a bit slower02:49
yoasifahh02:49
Sarvatti just dont like compiz, cant go a week without it causing a problem when i do use it and this is alot less cpu intensive than metacity compositing :D02:51
yoasifah i see02:51
Sarvattthe full gnome-shell is horrible on this netbook i'm on 99% of the time02:53
bjsniderit also has lots of stuff that's bling for its own sake02:53
bjsnider99% cpu?02:56
Sarvattmeant i'm on a netbook 99% of the time, 8.9" screen :D02:57
Sarvattthe menus are horribly huge on this02:57
bjsniderhorrible in what sense? slow?02:57
Sarvattnah takes up way too much screen space02:57
bjsniderin overview mode?02:58
Sarvattcant see enough to be useful in that overview mode either02:58
Sarvattit shows like 3 items in each section02:58
Sarvatti meant like the panel at the top and stuff02:58
bjsniderthe panel is big?02:59
Sarvattits like 3x as tall as my gnome-panel is02:59
bjsniderdon't notice it here, but i'm not on a netbook02:59
Sarvattyeah it looks fine on a normal screen but on this tiny 1024x600 one its too much02:59
bjsniderin overview, you can scroll-wheel the windows up in size03:00
Sarvattthe panel is like 80 pixels tall at the top03:00
Sarvattmaybe its just resizing that big because of font settings or something03:00
bjsniderdunno. you could go to their irc channel and ask03:01
Sarvatti'm real happy with gnome-panel though, window-picker-applet and maximus make it nice on a tiny screen03:07
Sarvattlets see if mplayer builds on lucid now, changed the nvidia-185-libvdpau-dev build-dep to libvdpau-dev and made it suggest libvdpau1. i dont think it's going to work right with the libxxf86vm-dev/x11proto-xf86vidmode-dev header change03:09
bjsniderlibxvidcore is the problem03:10
bjsniderit should probably build-dep libvdpau103:11
bjsnideralthough there was a debate about that between mario and a debian guy03:11
bjsniderit's quite an amusing read03:11
bjsnidershould the driver demand libvdpau or should the player?03:12
crimsundemand is a bit strong03:14
crimsunit should probably Recommend it03:15
bjsnideri'm not getting pulled into this03:15
crimsunPolicy is pretty clear, which is why I'm amused at the smoke n' mirrors03:16
bjsniderin my view, the graphics driver should pull in the library, so that the players can use it if it's there03:17
bjsniderand i don't know anything about the policy03:17
bjsniderand it sounds like a boring argument03:17
Sarvattwell it doesnt require libvdpau1 to use mplayer on non nvidia, I *guess* some people could possibly not want to waste the extra 100k having it forcibly installed with the nvidia driver but thats very non-intuitive for non-technical users who might want to use it and not know they should install that03:40
Sarvatt100k in a 120mb package, oh darn :)03:40
bjsniderthat's exactly what the argument between mario and the debian guy was centered on03:42
bjsniderof course mplayer should be built against the libvdpau headers03:44
bjsniderand you could argue that the library should then be installed with it03:44
Sarvattthe darn mplayer docs take ages to build and it does that first, kind of a pain in the butt for troubleshooting build errors :D03:50
bjsnidertakes about 15-20 minutes total03:52
Sarvatti'll have to dig through the lists, the arguement i saw was build related because it was trying to pull in headers that were already seperately packed into the mplayer a long time ago03:52
bjsniderwas mario involved in it?03:52
Sarvattnope03:54
Sarvattthe libxvidcore-dev things was fixed in the lucid source package already a few weeks before the one in nvidia-vdpau, guessing you based your svn checkout off karmic's debian/03:57
bjsnidernot sure what you mean03:58
bjsniderit's a version mismatch03:58
bjsniderthe dev package is a different version03:58
Sarvattthey aren't for me, must have worked all that out04:05
bjsniderperhaps you haven't updated or something04:06
bjsniderbut i pinged the bot and it spit back different versions04:06
bjsnider!info libxvidcore404:06
bjsnider!info libxvidcore4-dev04:06
ubottulibxvidcore4 (source: xvidcore): An open source MPEG-4 video codec (library). In component multiverse, is optional. Version 2:1.2.2+debian-0ubuntu1 (lucid), package size 249 kB, installed size 764 kB04:06
ubottulibxvidcore4-dev (source: xvidcore): High quality ISO MPEG4 codec library -- development files. In component multiverse, is optional. Version 2:1.1.2-0.1ubuntu4 (lucid), package size 257 kB, installed size 856 kB04:06
Sarvattahh ok i'm blind04:09
bjsniderso the ppa build fails because the -dev package tries to pull in the main package but the version is different so splat...it fails04:10
bjsniderbut why wasn't the dev package updated when the main package was?04:11
bjsniderthat's strange04:11
Sarvattit built fine in pbuilder04:12
bjsniderdid you run a pbuilder update first?04:13
bjsnideryou probably still have the older matching packages04:13
Sarvatti just built the pbuilder environment on that machine04:13
Sarvattit pulled in libxvidcore-dev 1.2.2, requirement in the mplayer deb is libxvidcore4 (>= 1.2.2), installed libxvidcore4 is 2:1.2.2+debian-0ubuntu104:14
bjsniderso it pulled in a newer -dev package than the one in the ppa build system04:15
bjsniderwait04:16
bjsnideryou pulled in libxvidcore-dev? not core4-dev?04:17
Sarvattoh you did libxvidcore4 and libxvidcore4-dev there, i thought you did libxvidcore-dev vs libxvidcore4-dev04:17
Sarvattyeah thats what the build-dep was changed to back in november in lucid04:17
bjsnider!info libxvidcore-dev04:17
ubottulibxvidcore-dev (source: xvidcore): An open source MPEG-4 video codec (development). In component multiverse, is optional. Version 2:1.2.2+debian-0ubuntu1 (lucid), package size 264 kB, installed size 944 kB04:17
bjsnideroh. no probem. didn't know about that.04:17
Sarvatthttps://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpeg4ip/+bug/48616904:17
ubottuUbuntu bug 486169 in transcode "Replace libxvidcore4-dev with libxvidcore-dev" [Medium,Fix released]04:17
bjsnideranything else i should know about?04:20
Sarvattjust a patch added relating to subtitles https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayer/2:1.0~rc3+svn20090426-1ubuntu1204:26
Sarvattlooks like thats the only one built since karmic, 1ubuntu11 must have failed because of the libxvidcore4-dev thing04:27
bjsniderthe fontconfig patch?04:27
bjsnideri already have that04:27
billybigriggerhmm04:27
billybigriggerjust noticed a calendar bug04:27
Sarvattat least it builds fine against the header change unlike nvidia-settings, thats all i was worried about04:28
billybigriggerdecember 2009 shows the 27th (today) on sunday which is correct04:28
billybigriggernevermind04:28
Sarvattand with the libvdpau changes as well, and vdpau works fine on it04:29
bjsniderSarvatt, the header change doesn't have anything to do with nvidia-settings04:29
bjsniderSarvatt, what was that patch for nvidia-settings?04:31
Sarvattmplayer has a build-dep on libxxf86vm-dev, if it needed that one header explicitly and didnt know about the changes after the split between proto/lib it could break like nvidia-settings did04:31
Sarvatthttp://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=20892604:32
bjsniderwell that package does exist in lucid04:33
Sarvattwhat package?04:34
bjsniderlibxxf86vm-dev'04:34
SarvattX11/extensions/xf86vmode.h was split into 2 seperate headers instead of all being in xf86vmode.h, if something needed something that was moved to the other header like nvidia-settings does it needs to check for it and build-dep on the proto04:35
bjsniderSarvatt, what are they calling the patch in gentoo?04:37
Sarvattwow, i *just* noticed nvidia-settings didnt build on edgers weeks ago, sheesh04:39
Sarvattthe success/fail icons arent on the screen on this tiny thing and i didnt scroll04:39
Sarvatthttp://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28974404:40
ubottubugs.gentoo.org bug 289744 in Applications "nvidia-settings-190.40 does not compile w/ libXxf86vm-1.1.0 (patch included)" [Normal,Resolved: fixed]04:40
bjsniderbut this isn't an mplayer patch04:44
bjsnideri an include it in future nvidia-settings builds though04:44
Sarvattbjsnider: would you mind if i just copied your nvidia-settings package over to xorg-edgers since binary copies from the older release seems to work fine? only reason I'm even putting nvidia in there is because I'm about to bump the video abi next time xserver is updated05:17
bjsniderwould i mind? this is gnu/linux we go there05:18
bjsnideryou can do whatever you want05:18
bjsniderbut you have to give me an mplayer patch05:18
Sarvattthere is no mplayer patch, I was building it to make sure it wouldnt need a patch05:18
Sarvatt:D05:19
bjsnideri c05:19
bjsniderwell, the 195 is the latest nvidia-settings but it has a showstopper that i reported to the nvidia corporation05:19
Sarvattthanks, I'm asking because sometimes people REALLY dont know what they are doing and copy packages out of edgers building against different things but the version still has my name in it so I get thrown off on bug reports05:19
bjsniderSarvatt, actually now that i think of it05:20
bjsnideryou probably should think twice about it05:20
bjsnideri sort of synced it to upstream debian05:20
bjsniderbut i didn't use their rules file because it's based on debleper 7.3 or something05:21
bjsniderso my package is kind of a hybrid between old and new05:21
bjsniderand i'm not 100% sure it's stable05:21
bjsniderpretty sure though05:21
Sarvattyeah I see, I was going to drop the whole -190 thing and make it plain nvidia-settings but getting rid of the dpatch junk is great :D i dont care as long as it works and nvidia-settings 180 has had a nasty xv contrast range bug since 185 was put in ubuntu05:22
Sarvattit works fine, i'm using it on my nvidia lappy because i needed an out from broken nouveau the other day :D05:22
bjsnideri did drop the -190 thing, didn't i?05:22
Sarvattnope, had to manually install nvidia-settings-19005:22
bjsnideroh. a new version is in the testing-ppa05:23
bjsnideri just haven't copied it over yet05:24
bjsniderhttps://launchpad.net/~nvidia-vdpau/+archive/testing-ppa05:24
bjsniderbut it built fine05:24
bjsnideryour netbook has an atom chip?05:25
Sarvattyeah acer aspire one aoa15005:26
bjsnideryou'd definitely benefit from the very latest vdpau code05:26
Sarvatti'd be eyeing an ion one if this one didnt have 11 hours battery life05:26
Sarvattoh nah this has intel graphics05:27
Sarvattnot trying to watch videos on a 9" screen either05:27
Sarvatti've got other laptops with nvidia and ati for testing things on, i dont use linux on my HTPC because vdpau *really* sucks compared to DXVA205:29
Sarvattgot 4TB of subtitled videos, and vdpau doesnt work with subtitles so yeah05:29
bjsnidervdpau works with subs05:30
bjsnidereven works with ssa05:30
Sarvattwhoa, really? going to habe to look into that05:33
bjsnideryou're right that it iddn't at first though05:34
bjsniderbut they fixed that a long time ago now05:34
bjsniderjust fire up smplayer and try out ssa subs and you'll see for yourself05:34
=== DanaG1 is now known as DanaG
=== yoasif1 is now known as yoasif
Sarvattbjsnider: Hmm, subtitles are *almost* ok using the lucid mplayer I just rebuilt, but its not working at all with yours07:38
Sarvattfunny that pulseaudio uses 3x the cpu as mplayer playing back this bluray though :)07:48
BUGabundo_workbom dia09:24
=== BUGabundo_work is now known as BUGabundo_lunch
=== BUGabundo_lunch is now known as BUGabundo_work
BUGabundo_workcan anyone point me in the direction of Ubuntu website webadmins?13:05
BUGabundo_workpage aint loading in android browser13:05
PiciBUGabundo_work: You could file a bug here: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu-website/+bugs13:07
BUGabundo_workwell not sure its a bug13:07
BUGabundo_workneed to debug it 1st13:07
BUGabundo_workbut thanks for the link Pici13:07
BUGabundo_workinicially though it was the new android browser... but all other tested SSL pages works13:08
CosmiChaoshello, how to remove the annoying notify-osd debug-grid (orange) from lucid alpha?14:48
=== jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna
=== maco2_ is now known as maco2
=== maco2 is now known as Guest82669
=== Guest82669 is now known as maco2
yofelCosmiChaos: that is possible, lemme look up hos15:22
yofel*how15:22
bjsniderSarvatt, subtitles _almost_ work? they've worked perfectly for a ong time. i'm not sure why they aren't working for you, but what kind of files are you trying to play?15:23
Sarvattdarn, didnt I pastebin the info after I said that? i'm not near that machine now and in the middle of bisecting a libdrm problem15:23
Sarvattwas a 4Mb h264 high profile L4 video, ass subtitles, mkv container aac audio, 1080p15:24
Sarvatthad to bump my cpu speed up, it was stuttering with ondemand15:25
bjsniderondemand?15:25
Sarvattwith your 1207 one I couldnt even get it to display anything though15:25
Sarvattdarn gotta run, i'll talk to ya later15:25
bjsnideri rebuilt mplayer last night as we were talking and copied it over this morning15:25
yofelCosmiChaos: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/notify-osd/+bug/482661/comments/415:26
ubottuUbuntu bug 482661 in notify-osd "[lucid] notify-osd has bad rendering" [Undecided,Invalid]15:26
=== maco2_ is now known as maco2
BUGabundo_workhey bjsnider15:43
om26er_!test15:50
ubottuyes, I'm alive.15:50
bjsniderBUGabundo_work, hey yo16:04
=== om26er_ is now known as om26er
=== \vish is now known as mac_v
=== mac_v is now known as \vish
=== shadeslayer is now known as shadeslayer_
BUGabundo_work[OT] oh joy http://ubunlog.com.ar/blog/tras-una-pelea-richard-stallman-detenido-en-el-aeropuerto-de-miami/17:24
geniiI have an ExpressCard 34 eSATA adapter which doesn't get detected unless it's in at boot time. Is there some hotplug module (like the old pciehp ) which could force detection?17:41
shadeslayer_wow.. even the experts have problems sometimes :P17:42
shadeslayer_(yes thats you genii :) )17:42
* genii slides shadeslayer_ a coffee17:42
* shadeslayer_ needed one17:42
shadeslayer_exams... :P17:43
shadeslayer_Shura: sorry for that,bad tab complete17:49
=== malnilion_ is now known as malnilion
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
prometHello, I was adding some custom scripts to my /etc/init.d/ dir, and I think I might have messed sumthin up. Some of my other scripts now no longer start automatically. I've checked my rc.* dirs, and can't find anything obviously out of whack. I think this has also prevents my virtual tty's from launching, as they are unresponsive when I try and access them via "ctrl-alt-F1 TO f6"20:24
prometAny Thoughts?20:24
promet:-D20:26
yofelhm.. checked that all symlinks in rc2.d are ok? do you still know which scripts you added?20:26
prometJust one actually, it was one I've written to autostart a Shoutcast server. I used the "update-rc.d defaults" command20:31
prometI haven't actually checked rc2.d links will do that now though, thanks for the feedback.20:31
yofelwell, I don't know too much about sysvinit, especially since we now have a upstart/sysvinit mix20:32
yofelpromet: why don't you convert it to an  upstart script?20:32
prometI don't have any experience with upstart, but I'm not against getting into it. Is it installed in Karmic, or do I have to fetch it? Does it coexist with init.d or "replace" it?20:33
yofelpromet: it's supposed to replace it, we're in the middle of that process, the new scripts are in /etc/init20:34
yofel!upstart20:34
ubottuUpstart is meant to replace the old Sys V Init system with an event-driven init model.  For more information please see: http://upstart.ubuntu.com/20:34
yofelpromet: and it's used by default on karmic and lucid20:35
prometThanks, I will check that out.20:35
prometI appreciate all of your input. Thanks!20:36
prometJust a clarification though, the /etc/init.d/ directory is a part of the "system-v init" system?20:38
yofelpromet: yes, the upstart scripts are being kept in /etc/init/20:38
prometCool, thx.20:38
elopshow do i update my menu.lst for an updated kernel version?20:40
elopsis there a way i can get apt-get to just do that once again?20:40
yofelelops: 'sudo update-grub' should do that for you20:40
yofelelops: any reason why you're using grub-legacy?20:41
DasEielops: if you install a kernel via apt or the update-functions, they get there automated20:44
elopsi had added a param into the menu.lst, which it detected, and gave me a curses page to choose an option20:44
elopslooks like it left the old menu.lst there20:44
elops?20:44
yofelelops: err...  how did you edit your menu.lst? If  you edit the kernel boot lines by hand you'll get a curses interface and the default is 'do nothing'20:45
elopsupdate-grub completed, but didnt change the file - i kept a copy before it, and diffed them20:45
yofelelops: can you pastebin your menu.lst?20:46
elopsyes20:48
elopshttp://pastebin.ca/172985820:48
yofelok, remembered something20:49
elopsive only pasted the end of it, cause the rest is all comments20:49
elopsi guess it did the do-nothing - how do i now get it to do what it was supposed to do?20:49
elopsthe change i had originally done to it was the maxcpus=120:49
yofelfirst, rename your menu.lst to menu.lst.bak or something like that, then run update-grub to get a blank one20:49
yofelelops: then, can you please paste the WHOLE file again? I need a part of the comments and I don't have a menu.lst myself20:50
yofelelops: ping?20:53
elopspaste the new one, or the old one?20:54
yofelelops: doesn't matter, I need the comments20:54
elopshttp://pastebin.ca/172986920:58
sebsebsebhi20:59
prometWow, this whole "Upstart" thing is a major change, I'm glad you guys told me about that, lol!21:00
elopsive diffed the newly-created one and the existing - the only changes seem to be in the display strings 'ubuntu 8.04.2' to 'ubuntu 8.04.3'21:00
elopsand of course, removed my maxcpus=1 option21:00
prometI have been floundering around without that information for days now.21:00
prometWhat is the method by which your average user is supposed to become aware of that sort of Dist-change? There ought to be a newsletter or soemthing...21:01
elopsyofel ?21:01
elopshttp://pastebin.ca/172987621:02
prometQouth the newsletter: "Oh, and btw, your entire startup script infrastructure is changing in Karmic; get hip quick!"21:02
yofelelops: on line 89 you'll see a defoptions= option, please put your maxcpus=1 there21:02
yofelelops: and since you seem to be running hardy, let's move this to #ubuntu21:02
elopsok sir21:02
prometThanks again, am now rebooting to test out upstart script changes, later!21:03
elopsthis is the diff of the newly-created menu.lst (by update-grub) vs the old one21:03
acidwashhi21:09
acidwashwhich future release of ubutnu will be i686 optimized ?21:10
acidwashor21:10
acidwashis there any ongoing project to launch i686 optimized version of release ? thx21:11
crimsunacidwash: there are no current plans, but you can rebuild all the sources packages yourself.21:12
penguin42acidwash: The problem is if you do that do you optimise for 686, AMD, Core2, i7 or what?21:12
acidwashcrimsun: i am trying but it seems like it takes for ever21:13
penguin42acidwash: You'll get most benefit by recompiling a handful of libraries and the kerne;21:13
acidwashusing apt-build to do such21:13
crimsunacidwash: several years ago, a handful of devs profiled the kernel, libc, openssl, etc., and established that only for a handful of programs is there any discernable speed-up.21:13
acidwashhmm21:14
penguin42crimsun: I do wonder if that's as true these days; especially with things like ss4.2 having ops for string handling21:14
acidwashyeah i read that, i386 is reliable21:14
crimsunpenguin42: I would venture it isn't too far off the mark, but we certainly could revisit it if an enterprising community member drives it.21:15
penguin42crimsun: Hehe, I probably don't have the time at the moment; but my guess is sooner or later it might get worth it; although I know some of the critical kernel routines (e.g. RAID etc) already do special stuff if they have it21:16
acidwashcrimsun: will apt-build world accomplish my concern21:17
crimsunacidwash: it will probably get you some ways toward it21:17
penguin42acidwash: I really wouldn't rebuild the whole let - I mean do you really care about the performance of something boring like the hibernate/indicator applet?21:17
penguin42^let^lot21:18
acidwashpenguin42: well no harm in trying so ?21:18
maxbother than taking so long that the entire exercise becomes impractical21:19
penguin42acidwash: Well ok if you can wait that long for it to rebuild, but my point is you'll get most of the benefit by some of the main libs and prog you use a lot21:19
acidwashoh ok21:19
foreverubun2Is Lucid stable-ish? ie not crashing whenever you use the keyboard21:19
acidwashpenguin42: how about optimizing the base system ? my kernel is already i 68621:19
penguin42acidwash: Yeh do the base stuff and you'll get a long way21:20
acidwashpenguin42: and base packages/modules/libs ... etc are ?21:20
yoasifthis is all meaningless if you are running a 64bit os right?21:21
acidwashnop21:22
acidwashits 3221:22
maxbforeverubun2: Depends how you define '-ish'21:23
maxbSeems to be OK for me, but only after I recompiled the i915 kernel module using the version from karmic, because lucid's was breaking for me21:23
maxbi.e. it's not critically broken, but don't expect it to be pain free either21:24
penguin42yoasif: ish, the 586-686 difference yes, but for example the difference between optimising for an original Opteron and a current opteron or an i7 may be useful - or might not be21:29
Mic__haelcan anyone confirm the empathy regression in bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/451568? I just added a note to confirm that I am still seeing this in Lucid21:51
ubottuUbuntu bug 451568 in empathy "Empathy don't close with click on notification area icon" [Low,Fix released]21:51
=== malnilion is now known as malnilion_
=== malnilion_ is now known as malnilion
=== malnilion is now known as malnilion__
=== malnilion__ is now known as malnilion
BUGabundoboas ninos22:22
syn-acksup BUGabundo22:22
BUGabundonothing much22:23
acidwashguten mortgen22:23
syn-ackwerd22:23
acidwashwhat happen to ubuntu mirrors and archive. i get max 10 to 12 kbb dl22:26
bjsnideri'm banging them heavy for a personal project. hope you don't mind22:26
acidwashi use to get alot more22:27
acidwash*used22:27
acidwashbahhh22:28
acidwashit dropped to 4 bps22:28
acidwash*kbps22:28
acidwashbjsnider: how much dl speed u get ?22:30
bjsniderall of it22:31
acidwashu greedy22:31
acidwashleave some for me p22:31
bjsnideri'm trying to rebuild all qt packages to use gtk instead22:31
bjsniderthus stamping out the scourge that is kde forever22:31
penguin42bjsnider: That's erm interesting22:32
yofelo.O22:32
yofelcan't you just set qt to use the gtk theme? or what's the problem?22:32
bjsniderno, qt must not exist anymore22:32
syn-ackQT and KDE really is evil22:35
acidwashi like gnome p22:35
* kinja-sheep is away: Dogpark!22:35
* DanaG has actually switched to kde now.22:43
* ToxinPowe ToxinPowe too22:43
ToxinPoweups xD22:43
BluesKajbjsnider, I find gtk just too cartooney for myn taste22:44
yofelI have nothing against kde, but I got increasingly annoyed with gnome22:44
yofeland kde is really nice since 4.3, and 4.4 is great22:44
acidwashso is gnome22:45
BluesKajthe panel at the top of the screen is annoying too22:45
yofelI don't say gnome is bad, it's nice, I just like kde better22:45
ToxinPoweKDE 4.4 is so nice... even for gnome users, like me ;P22:45
acidwashkde is buggy22:45
bjsniderosx has a top panel. windows has a bottom panel22:46
bjsniderkde is more like windows22:46
yofelBluesKaj: haha, i actually have my kde panel at the top ^^22:46
BluesKajyofel, well to each his own :p22:46
TscheesyKDE has an OSX-like Panel for the Netbook-Version ;)22:47
BluesKajdaughters OSX has bottom panel22:47
ToxinPowedon't stop the flame, I would like read another GNOME vs KDE xd22:50
acidwashgnome is rock solid22:50
ToxinPowetrue22:51
TscheesyKDE-Users are just Happy with theire System - they don't need to flame22:51
yofelas are gnome users22:51
ToxinPowe:o22:52
Tscheesyso then - where just fine ;)22:52
yofelI had crashes in gnome as I had them in kde22:52
Tscheesy*we are22:52
yofelwhich one has more bugs is something I don't want to judge22:52
ToxinPowewhat do you think about GNOME future?22:53
acidwashCHROME p22:53
yofeldunno, I have to admit that have never ever tried gnome-shell since it came after I switched to kde22:53
ToxinPoweI tried gnome-shell and I don't like, we'll see22:59
bjsniderprobably everybody will eventually be using gnome-shell23:02
ToxinPowewhy?23:04
BUGabundo'cause that's the way Gnome is ehading23:07
BUGabundo*heading23:07
* penguin42 admits to not liking the general drag of having to follow the crowd; there are things I really don't like and are now hard to change within either of gnome or kde23:07
bjsnidergnome-shell makes it easier for the user to interact with the desktop without sacrificing screen real estate23:09
Tscheesypenguin42:  that's the way it is under Linux - otherways - not updating for a longer Period leaves your System in a unusable state23:09
penguin42Tscheesy: And as I say, I really don't like it - it used to be that gnome/kde were quite tunable so if you didn't like something you could change it23:10
Tscheesyone can't stop development ;)23:10
penguin42Tscheesy: I'm just not sure it's better23:11
Tscheesyyou can use Debian stable - but still this one will update sooner or later23:12
penguin42Tscheesy: I know what I can do, I think you're missing my point23:12
Tscheesyit's too hard to do all the security backports23:12
syn-ackI liked KDE when it was still in the 3.5x series... I just can't stand KDE 4 since it's slow, Bloated, and like I think it was Tscheesy it doesnt seem as "Tweakable"23:18
syn-ackAnd yes, I've seen the mockups of Gnome 3 and I don't like that either. :/23:18
bjsniderwhy did you ike kde 3.5?23:18
syn-ackIt was faster, and imo more tightly integrated23:19
syn-ackyou didnt have all this BS with their widgets and stuff like you do now23:19
syn-ackagain, thats just my personal opinion, not trying to flame23:19
bjsniderof course it's your personal opinion23:20
Tscheesysyn-ack: SC4.4Beta2 is a big step in performance i think - for Tweaks the GUI's are missing atm23:20
syn-ackTscheesy: hrm23:20
syn-ackand I dont know what it is but I never really liked Kubuntu... it didnt seem quite as "refined" as Ubuntu... and I can't put my finger on it23:21
bjsniderkde is ok in mandr*whateveritscallednow23:22
syn-ackyeah, I didn't mind it in Gentoo either23:22
Tscheesysyn-ack: take a look at the KNE when 10.04 is published ;)23:22
syn-ackheh23:22
syn-ackbjsnider: Then again, I was using KDE 3.5 in Gentoo as well but that really was so many years ago23:23
bjsnideri think people typically come to kde from windows because the gui is similar, but then move to gnome as they get more experienced and don't want kde's millions of useless options and lengthy explanations of everything23:24
bjsniderthat was the case with me, in any event23:25
syn-ackmeh23:25
syn-ackWhen I started using linux, It was Gnome 1.x anyway. :P23:26
Tscheesybjsnider: i started with Gnome ..then Mandrike ended with Kubuntu :)23:26
syn-ackGod, I've been using this for far too long23:26
penguin42When I started using linux it was fvwm!23:26
syn-ackpenguin42: hah23:26
syn-ackHell, I remember using Sawfish as my WM in Gnome23:26
ToxinPowefvwm, wmaker, icewm... yeah xD23:26
penguin42(although when I started using Unix it was a text terminal)23:26
syn-ackThen from there I moved on to CDE for a little bit and I actually liked that. :P23:28
syn-ackIts just a shame that CDE isnt open23:28
penguin42cde on linux? You sick and twisted man23:29
crimsunpeople do move between KDE and GNOME fairly fluidly, too23:30
syn-ackpenguin42: hahahaha23:30
syn-ackRed Hat FTW! :P23:30
penguin42crimsun: Yeh I bounced between them over the years; never really got on with KDE4 though23:31
crimsunKDE 4.3.x is quite nice; 4.4 SC is looking quite good, too23:32
crimsunultimately for me it doesn't matter; I pretty much only use terminal emulators, tmux/byobu, etc.23:33
ToxinPoweexcuse me, Are you from the past??? /IT CROWD off23:34
ToxinPowexD23:34
penguin42crimsun: I don't know if they've changed it more recently; but what got me on 4.x was them making the desktop more dynamic but restricted - i.e. it was now harder just to put arbitrary files and links and stuff on the background - that's been something you've been able to do for a long long time now23:35
crimsunToxinPowe: I don't know if I'd identify with Moss offhand, though23:35
ToxinPowe=)23:35
=== acidwash_ is now known as acidwash
DanaGbad punctuation: "wan't new software..."?23:39
DanaG=P23:40
alex_mayorgais nv still broken?23:40
bjsnidercrimsun, so for you, the linux gui desktop achieved everything it ever needed in the mid-1990s. is that accurate?23:55
BUGabundololol23:58
BUGabundoall but be rich23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!