[00:15] <ianloic> hey, any tips for getting a backtrace from mozilla?
[00:15] <ianloic> erm firefox
[00:15] <ianloic> I installed the debug packages (firefox, libxul, js)
[00:15] <ianloic> but firefox -g doesn't seem to load them
[01:26] <asac> ianloic: you probably installed wrong ones
[01:26] <asac> if you downloaded from mozilla then there is no way
[01:26] <asac> you have to submit the crash to their crashdb to get symbolization
[01:31] <[reed]> asac: whatever happened to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Specs/Karmic/FirefoxWifiScanning?
[09:39] <BUGabundo_work> morning
[14:10] <fta> BUGabundo_work, what is the "Flag" for in identica?
[14:17] <BUGabundo_work> fta: == report user
[14:18] <fta> but you can't unflag.. so no room for mistake
[14:20] <BUGabundo_work> no worry
[14:20] <BUGabundo_work> its manually reviewed by the team
[14:20] <BUGabundo_work> i flaged evan on joke
[16:48] <BUGabundo_work> fta ch dec??
[16:48] <BUGabundo_work> *dev
[16:49] <fta> yezs
[16:49] <fta> yes
[16:50] <fta> BUGabundo_work, daily: 4.0.284.0, dev: 4.0.266.0, beta: 4.0.249.30
[16:53] <BUGabundo_work> ahh
[16:53]  * BUGabundo_work sticks with daily
[16:58] <fta> then, don't complain that you're stuck with a bug during xmas ;)
[17:01] <BUGabundo_work> oh but i do...
[17:01] <BUGabundo_work> YOU SHOULD FIXED IT instead o being eating turkey with the family
[17:01] <BUGabundo_work> :o
[17:01] <BUGabundo_work> then again, it gave me a change to re-use firefox again...
[17:01] <BUGabundo_work> man i MISSED IT
[17:01] <BUGabundo_work> so many nice things...
[17:02] <BUGabundo_work> but so damn SLOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW
[17:45] <asac> speed is not everything i tell you ;)
[17:46] <asac> but i agree ... firefox is much better in so many details - you dont notice until you go back after using chromium for a few weeks
[17:46] <asac> also webkit rendering engine seems to be not really supported on the web ;)
[17:46] <asac> lots of websites more or less not perfectly working for me
[17:54] <BUGabundo_work> no prob for me
[19:32] <fta> asac, https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-daily/+archive/dev
[19:40] <asac> good
[19:53] <sebner> asac the mozilla fanboy :P
[19:53] <asac> because i think firefox is more mature?
[19:53] <asac> ;)
[19:53] <asac> would be crazy if it wasnt
[19:54] <fta> chromium is still young
[19:58]  * sebner is still wondering why stuff like chromium or songbird etc is in PPAs since years but not in the official archive
[19:59] <fta> *sigh*
[20:01] <jcastro> sebner: the songbird thing is documented in the bug
[20:02]  * sebner is missing and forgetting so much over the months/years xD
[20:03] <jcastro> well, you said you were wondering.
[20:03] <jcastro> it's all in launchpad. :D
[20:03] <fta> asac, umd moved to 5am, ucd at 4am, ucd-dev/beta at 5pm
[20:03] <sebner> jcastro: I know there is a reason but what kind of reason :P
[20:04] <jcastro> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/94494
[20:06] <asac> fta: ok.
[20:07] <asac> maybe move ucd as the long runners to 3.30 ;)
[20:07] <asac> hehe
[20:07] <sebner> jcastro: uhh, thx
[20:07] <fta> asac, that means the 5pm slot will almost always stay empty, or at least chromium free
[20:07] <asac> sebner: you can help. fill chromium copyright file with all info and file an upstream bug with all files not properly licensed ;)
[20:08] <asac> yes
[20:08] <asac> i am fine with that
[20:08] <asac> just not sure if the "fast" mozilla stuff should be queued behind the slow chromium dailies
[20:08] <asac> but well
[20:08] <asac> i dont really care
[20:09] <fta> moz is not that fast, there are so many packages it's often longer
[20:09] <sebner> asac: I'm not using it. I just care for all the poor users out there that want to :P
[20:09] <fta> we always come back to the not-enough-builders topic
[20:10] <fta> or not-powerful-enough
[21:05] <micahg> asac: that fix yesterday for tb31 wasn't enough
[21:05] <micahg> I didn't have time to troubleshoot last night
[21:05] <micahg> I'll try again tonight
[21:06] <micahg> s/troubleshoot/debug/
[21:09] <asac> k
[21:13] <mbana> hi anyone using gnome do
[21:16] <asac> no :)
[22:21] <dogatemycomputer> Greetings..  I am looking at bug # 499231 and new to triaging.   The reporter indicates after 12 urls are added to his history the dropdown no longer updates with the most frequently used URLs.   The problem I am having is finding any documentation that describes what should appear in the location bar pulldown so I can at least confirm if this is really a bug?
[22:34] <asac> dogatemycomputer: hi
[22:35] <asac> dogatemycomputer: i dont know
[22:35] <asac> i mean ... most likely it is as it is. and unless its different to what the upstream builds give its right
[22:36] <asac> if someone disagrees he has to open a bug and ask for a different behaviour
[22:36] <asac> one needs to check code what the current behaviour is
[22:36] <micahg> AFAICT, it's based on usage
[22:37] <asac> it doesnt match the order i see in histroy (ctrl + h) sorted by most visted
[22:37] <asac> visited
[22:38] <micahg> it's pretty close for me
[22:38] <asac> pretty close means its different :)
[22:38] <micahg> then again, I'm using 3.6b5
[22:38] <micahg> I think it might skip 500/404 errors
[22:39] <micahg> whereas history doesn't
[22:39] <micahg> that still doesn't explain it
[22:40] <asac> well. i dont have 500/404 entries there ;)
[22:42] <micahg> mozilla 420446 has some clues
[22:42] <micahg> it seems to be typed urls versus visited sites
[22:44] <asac> hmm ... could be yeah
[22:49] <BUGabundo> hey guys
[23:43] <BUGabundo> asac: can you help me here https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/n2n/+bug/501768 ?
[23:43] <BUGabundo>  ERROR: ioctl() [No such file or directory][2]
[23:43] <BUGabundo> rings any bells to you ?