| crimsun | oh jeez, 46 different VIA codecs | 00:04 |
|---|---|---|
| crimsun | well, that'll keep me occupied while I wait for VTK to build | 00:04 |
| crimsun | 30% through the build! | 01:28 |
| geser | in 90min? that's about 3h for the remaining 70% :( | 01:33 |
| crimsun | geser: yep. And, there's clearly something wrong with this CMake progress | 01:34 |
| sebner | geser: crimsun hhiuhu | 01:34 |
| crimsun | it has been at 100% for five minutes on another box building Java bindings :-) | 01:34 |
| geser | Hi sebner , still awake? | 01:34 |
| sebner | geser: yeah I'm at a friends house and feeling like doing packaging work ^^ | 01:35 |
| geser | sebner: training a future MOTU? :) | 01:39 |
| sebner | geser: nah, haXX0ring packages for Debian xD | 01:40 |
| sebner | geser: working through maaaaany files for creating an acceptable copyright :\ | 01:40 |
| crimsun | man, I've cycled twice through the PID space just for docs generation | 01:43 |
| crimsun | I think I'm going to escape back to the simpler world of kernel hacking | 01:44 |
| bjsnider | there's no formatting requirement in a debian/rules file that would require 7 consecutive tabs on a line is there? | 02:58 |
| RAOF | bjsnider: No. | 02:59 |
| bjsnider | i swear i found it like this | 02:59 |
| machina | I was working on packaging a new upstream version of xsensors for ubuntu, but chose instead to try and get the new upstream in debian http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=446530 | 03:39 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 446530 in xsensors "xsensors: New upstream version (0.60) available" [Wishlist,Open] | 03:39 |
| machina | unfortunately the debian maintainer is not very responsive | 03:39 |
| machina | Should I wait a couple weeks, or should I go and try and get a new version in ubuntu? | 03:39 |
| bjsnider | what do you need him for? | 03:40 |
| machina | I was told on IRC that having a newer version than debian would cause sync problems.. | 03:40 |
| bjsnider | oh, i see. you want to push the latst upstream code into debian. i thought you meant you wanted to pull the latest in debian into ubuntu | 03:42 |
| machina | yeah, I also made the "debian directory" needed for the new version, but met a few stumbling blocks before I could finalize the debian/ubuntu package.. | 03:44 |
| bjsnider | like dependencies and such | 03:45 |
| machina | I used most of the dependencies from previous versions, but I did notice another bug report about that.. my problem was mostly about the debian/copyright file (it's at the bottom of the bug report) | 03:46 |
| ScottK | Particularly for Lucid/Squeeze where we are synchronizing release freeze it'd be good to keep the same version in Ubuntu and Debian. | 03:47 |
| machina | Is that the cadence thing shuttleworth was talking about earlier? I couldn't find any updates on it. | 03:48 |
| machina | So would that mean it's best just to patch the older version of xsensors? | 03:49 |
| === Whoopie_ is now known as Whoopie | ||
| === binitamshah is now known as binitamshah|away | ||
| machina | I guess I'll just push the new upstream to ubuntu | 04:11 |
| ScottK | machina: It may be better to do that, but your efforts to get Debian updated are good too. | 04:36 |
| machina | cool, thanks for the advice | 04:38 |
| w3asal | what exactly happens to the sync when there's a newer version in ubuntu than debian? | 04:59 |
| === binitamshah|away is now known as binitamshah | ||
| ScottK | w3asal: Nothing until Debian gets a newer version. | 05:35 |
| w3asal | so it's just good policy to try to push the new version into debian, but not necessarily bad for ubuntu if it doesn't happen? | 05:36 |
| === asac_ is now known as asac | ||
| crimsun | sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to '(!#$*': redefined extern inline functions are not considered for inlining | 07:18 |
| crimsun | sigh, there goes that pile. Thanks, gcc-4.4 (and gcc-snapshot). | 07:18 |
| foxbuntu | bjsnider, ping | 07:21 |
| foxbuntu | bjsnider, thought I would let you know there is a bug in the nvidia packages in the in vdpau testing ppa | 07:22 |
| foxbuntu | bjsnider, they are pointing to a depends on libvdpau, but the package name is really libvdpau1 | 07:23 |
| crimsun | foxbuntu: that isn't a bug. | 07:24 |
| crimsun | $ apt-cache show libvdpau1|grep ^Pro | 07:24 |
| crimsun | Provides: libvdpau | 07:24 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, The following packages have unmet dependencies: | 07:25 |
| foxbuntu | nvidia-glx-190: Depends: libvdpau | 07:25 |
| foxbuntu | E: Broken packages | 07:25 |
| crimsun | foxbuntu: and? | 07:27 |
| crimsun | as long as you have libvdpau1 installed, your package manager shouldn't whine | 07:27 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, yes, but if you dont, it wont install the drivers | 07:28 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, so it is a bug | 07:28 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, the proper depends is libvdpau1 or better would be not at all, as libvdpau1 is not a required piece to the nvidia drivers | 07:29 |
| crimsun | foxbuntu: I agree that it should be a Recommends, not a Depends | 07:30 |
| crimsun | foxbuntu: however, I disagree that it is a bug | 07:30 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, how could it not be? | 07:30 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, I am not motu, but I am trying to understand | 07:30 |
| crimsun | I just tried, and apt-get and aptitude both worked correctly | 07:30 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, from that ppa? | 07:31 |
| crimsun | yes | 07:31 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, without libvdpau1 already installed? | 07:31 |
| crimsun | now, if you manually used dpkg -i but did *not* include libvdpau1...deb, that still isn't a bug. That's your own fault. | 07:31 |
| crimsun | foxbuntu: yes, from within a schroot. | 07:31 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, I was able to do the same once, but after attempting to upgrade to another build of libvdpau and that package it failed on the upgrade | 07:32 |
| crimsun | well, certainly it could be made better with libvdpau1 | libvdpau | 07:33 |
| foxbuntu | crimsun, agreed on that point | 07:34 |
| happyaron | sorry if it's not suitable to ask here, does CC by-sa 2.5 compatible with LGPLv3? | 07:43 |
| superm1 | foxbuntu, crimsun no libvdpau shouldnt be a depends or recommends | 08:03 |
| superm1 | that's the bug | 08:03 |
| superm1 | it does nothing for the nvidia driver itself | 08:03 |
| superm1 | it's the applications that should be depending on libvdpau1 (by build-depending on libvdpau-dev and shlibs resolving libvdpau1) | 08:03 |
| yuanyelele | Hi! Why don't we have a free version of mplayer, with patented codecs in a separate package? | 08:40 |
| martoss | hey folks, i have two packages to review. I uploaded them to revu but they don't show up in revu. | 11:10 |
| surfzoid | directhex: Hi, in the mono rule file you use autoreconf -i -f -s, the symlinks switch is really important, or it will be same to use libtool file of mono source rather link them to the system one ? | 11:16 |
| cornucopic | yesterday, I used 'debuild -sa -S' to build my signed source package. What is the 'a' switch for? | 12:58 |
| geser | -sa Forces the inclusion of the original source. | 13:03 |
| geser | i.e. the .orig.tar.gz | 13:03 |
| cornucopic | and -S is for signing? | 13:04 |
| cornucopic | or -S for source package and signing is the default behavior? | 13:04 |
| geser | -S Specifies that only the source should be uploaded | 13:04 |
| geser | signing is the default behaviour | 13:05 |
| cornucopic | thanks geser! | 13:05 |
| geser | -us Do not sign the source package. | 13:05 |
| geser | -uc Do not sign the .changes file. | 13:05 |
| bdrung_ | porthose: do you have some sponsor examples? | 13:30 |
| porthose | bdrung_, I just sent you a mail listing all the bugs you have sponsored for me, there is also a list of bugs that I have worked on at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CharlieSmotherman :) | 13:55 |
| bjsnider | foxbuntu, i removed libvdpau from the depends list | 14:13 |
| bdrung_ | porthose: thanks. | 15:04 |
| bdrung_ | porthose: you are doing so many syncs, why not syncing ampache? 3.0 (quilt) is now supported in ubuntu. | 15:05 |
| === thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
| === azeem_ is now known as azeem | ||
| === zooko` is now known as zookol | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| vadi21 | I'm trying to create a package for a lua module, but having a hard time understanding lua5.1-policy-dev/Makefile.Debian.conf. Anyone know a good page that explains what values are supposed to be where? | 19:30 |
| crimsun | some of these upstream "fixes" for gcc-4.4's more stringent CXX compliance are downright nasty | 20:21 |
| crimsun | like, casting away a const char *? what the blazes? | 20:21 |
| jreinhardt | Hi everybody. A year ago I packaged a tex package (#310015) and tried to get it through revu, but then lost the patience. Today a new upstream version was released and I updated my package. Is someone interested in revuing it? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pgfplots | 21:26 |
| TomJaeger | Hi. I'm trying to convert a package to debhelper 7, and I can't figure out how I'm supposed to call dh_installman, dh_installchangelogs and dh_installdocs and I can't really find any documentation besides http://kitenet.net/~joey/blog/entry/cdbs_killer___40__design_phase__41__/. | 21:31 |
| TomJaeger | What is the correct way to do this? | 21:31 |
| ScottK | TomJaeger: Why are you converting it? | 21:33 |
| TomJaeger | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/502366 | 21:35 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 502366 in easystroke "Please upgrade easystroke to 0.5.2" [Undecided,Incomplete] | 21:36 |
| ScottK | TomJaeger: OK, but why redo the packaging? | 21:38 |
| TomJaeger | Benjamin suggested to switch to debhelper v7. | 21:38 |
| ScottK | OK, my view is generally to not make unneeded changes, but if there's a specific problem that switching to dh 7 solves, then go for it. | 21:39 |
| TomJaeger | I don't really care either way, so I'm fine with keeping things the way they are. | 21:40 |
| foxbuntu | bjsnider, thanks. | 21:57 |
| === bdefreese2 is now known as bddebian | ||
| dhillon-v10 | hi all, I am packaging this ppa for this software that has a makefile, all the user needs to do is to run the makefile and everything is done, I got everything else but including autotools.mk class gives me an error that a configure file doesn't exist and this is the way its supposed to be | 22:52 |
| ScottK | PPA packaging isn't on topic for #ubuntu-motu | 22:57 |
| jmarsden | dhillon-v10: If there is a working makefile already, why use autotools.mk ? Seems odd, if the upstream software does not use autotools, don't package with autotools.mk :) | 22:58 |
| dhillon-v10 | ScottK, which channel should I got to ? | 22:59 |
| ScottK | dhillon-v10: I'd say #launchpad, but they'd say here. There probably isn't one. | 23:00 |
| dhillon-v10 | jmarsden, so how do I get the debian/rules file to call the makefile | 23:00 |
| dhillon-v10 | ScottK, :) | 23:00 |
| jmarsden | dhillon-v10: Just run make :) | 23:00 |
| dhillon-v10 | jmarsden, so wait just type in make in debian/rules ? that's it | 23:01 |
| jmarsden | Yes. | 23:01 |
| dhillon-v10 | jmarsden, thanks a bunch :D | 23:01 |
| jmarsden | Sounds like you need to go through the Package Guide and understand packaging some more... | 23:01 |
| dhillon-v10 | jmarsden, you are awesome it works I read the package guide before, but I will read it again :) | 23:02 |
| jmarsden | You're welcome. | 23:02 |
| dhillon-v10 | jmarsden, every time I encounter something new I document it, so that way I don't forget, this was something I had never seen before so... | 23:03 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!