[00:08] <sirpengi> is there a way to fetch a branch but not pull any history?
[00:08] <bob2> --depth
[00:08] <bob2> hm, maybe it only works for clones
[00:12] <sirpengi> i don't seem to be able to find any documentation about --depth
[00:12] <bob2> oops, wrong channel, sorry =)
[00:13] <sirpengi> anyhow, I think what I'm looking for is --lightweight checkout
[00:13] <bob2> I don't think "history horizons" has been implemented yet, but the lightweight checkout plugin might be good enough
[00:13] <bob2> or you could stack
[00:14] <sirpengi> what do you mean by stack?
[00:15] <bob2> http://doc.bazaar.canonical.com/latest/en/user-guide/stacked.html
[00:17] <sirpengi> ohh, nifty
[00:18] <sirpengi> that'll involve me finding a place for the stacked branch though...
[00:18] <sirpengi> well, I'll see if the lightweight checkout works...
[00:25] <maxb> Noldorin: Funnily enough, I just needed to replace my system dulwich with a newer version
[00:25] <Noldorin> maxb: oh right?
[00:25] <Noldorin> you on linux though, i take it?
[00:26] <maxb> I came up with the idea of creating a file .bazaar/plugins/AAAusedulwich.py containing "import sys; sys.path.insert(0, '/my/path/to/dulwich')
[00:26] <maxb> Seems to work :-)
[00:26] <Noldorin> oh cool
[00:26] <Noldorin> i was thinking something along those lines too, but don't know any python, so meh
[00:27] <Noldorin> maxb: also, are you using the binary/python version of bzr?
[00:39] <maxb> I don't think that question has any meaning on Linux
[01:00] <Noldorin> maxb: heh, fair enough
[01:00] <Noldorin> maxb: i'll give that a go shortly. thanks for the tip :)]
[01:12] <Noldorin> maxb: wait. this AAAusedulwich.py file... it's just in C:\Program Files\Bazaar\plugins ?
[01:20] <maxb> I imagine that would be the relevant windows location
[01:38] <Noldorin> maxb: ah ok. what's with the AAA bit...?
[01:47] <maxb> To make it sort first
[01:55] <Noldorin> ah fair enough
[02:12] <Noldorin> maxb: i get this error now:
[02:12] <Noldorin> No module named protocol
[02:12] <Noldorin> Unable to load plugin u'dulwich' from u'C:/Program Files/Bazaar/plugins'
[02:12] <Noldorin> bzr: ERROR: exceptions.AttributeError: 'InterRepository' object has no attribute
[02:12] <Noldorin>  'fetch_objects'
[02:12] <jelmer> hi Noldorin
[02:12] <jelmer> Noldorin: did you see my reply to your bug comment?
[02:15] <Noldorin> hi jelmer
[02:15] <Noldorin> yes i did. i was just going to do a bit more testing before i replied :)
[02:16] <Noldorin> jelmer: i noticed shortly after that it seems to be a problem with dulwich
[02:21] <maxb> Noldorin: uhm, it shouldn't be loading dulwich itself as a plugin
[02:21] <maxb> if you have a C:/Program Files/Bazaar/plugins/dulwich, get rid ot it
[02:21] <maxb> *of
[02:22] <Noldorin> hmm
[02:23] <Noldorin> maxb: but i don't...
[02:23] <Noldorin> i did previously, but i deleted it then
[02:23]  * maxb is confused, then
[02:25] <Noldorin> yeah, odd...
[03:09] <Noldorin> jelmer: just update the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/449507
[08:19] <andrewblack> I am prob being dense, is there a command to give a list of all files in the repository
[08:24] <chx> hi. i want to back out a revision that changed lots of stuff ... 700+ revisions ago. I have reverted to the previous revision and planning to apply the revisions since in a loop. i was thinking to do a 'dry run' check for error and if it applies flawlessly then apply otherwise record for later manual work.
[09:15] <fullermd> chx: Well, if by 'reverted' you mean 'bzr revert', it's almost certainly not doing what you think it is...
[09:15] <fullermd> chx: Sounds more like a rebase-type operation.
[09:16] <fullermd> andrewblack: You presumably mean 'in a branch', not 'in a repository'.  See "bzr ls".
[09:22] <andrewblack> cheers fullermd .  i havent quite got hang of bzr terminology
[09:27] <fullermd> andrewblack: Generally, anything you do, you do it to a branch or a working tree; you almost never do anything to a repository directly.
[09:31] <andrewblack> ok.   ls -V does what i want.  ls by itself gives unknown files too whic confused me
[12:46] <Noldorin> jelmer: hello?
[13:05] <jelmer> Noldorin, hi
[13:29] <Noldorin> hey
[13:30] <Noldorin> jelmer: i saw youre reply to the bug report...
[13:30] <Noldorin> wondering how my installation of dulwich got borked though....
[13:30] <Noldorin> if you could help me figure out how it needs to be setup on windows, that would be great.
[13:56] <jelmer> Noldorin: I've never used it on Windows I must admit
[14:14] <Noldorin> jelmer: hehe ok
[14:15] <Noldorin> jelmer: well what would you suggest i do if i were on linux?
[14:15] <Noldorin> (maybe i can translate for windows)
[14:20] <jelmer> Noldorin, I'd run "python setup.py install" in the dulwich source dir
[14:20] <jelmer> Noldorin: and copy bzr-git to ~/.bazaar/plugins/git
[14:21] <maxb> jelmer: ooi, what would you suggest for a per-user install of dulwich?
[14:22] <jelmer> maxb: I've aliased bzr to 'PYTHONPATH=$PYTHONPATH:/home/jelmer/pylib /usr/bin/bzr'
[14:23] <maxb> Ah. I've done sys.path manipulation in ~/.bazaar/plugins/AAAusedulwich.py
[14:52] <Noldorin> jelmer: sorry, lost internet conn
[14:53] <jelmer> Noldorin, did you see my reply?
[14:54] <Noldorin> jelmer: looks like using cygwin to compile puts things in the wrong place
[14:54] <Noldorin> http://pastebin.ca/1736212
[14:54] <Noldorin> Noldorin: and copy bzr-git to ~/.bazaar/plugins/git
[14:54] <Noldorin> that's the last message i got ^
[15:00] <Noldorin> jelmer: look right/wrong to you?
[15:02] <jelmer> Noldorin: So far
[15:03] <Noldorin> jelmer: don't i really want the .egg in C:\Python25\... though?
[15:03] <Noldorin> i'm still getting No module named dulwich.errors
[15:03] <Noldorin> when i dpush
[15:04] <jelmer> Noldorin: If you want the egg in c:\python25 I don't think you should be using cygwin
[15:04] <Noldorin> jelmer: yeah...i really want to run the bzr on windows in (c:\program files) to use bzr-git
[15:04] <jelmer> Noldorin: are you using bzr in cygwin?
[15:04] <Noldorin> what is the alternative?
[15:04] <Noldorin> i don't have VS 2003...
[15:04] <jelmer> Noldorin: in that case, you shouldn't be using cygwin - that's completely independent
[15:04] <Noldorin> ok
[15:05] <Noldorin> i guess i just wanted to use cygwin for the GCC compiler
[15:05] <Noldorin> hmm
[15:05] <jelmer> Noldorin: binaries generated by that C compiler won't be usable with the python in c:\python25
[15:05] <Noldorin> i sere
[15:05] <Noldorin> see*
[15:06] <Noldorin> i don't even know if c:\program files\bazaar\bzr.exe uses the python in c:\python25 though
[15:06] <Noldorin> what i really want is to install bzr-git and dulwich *for bzr.exe in program files*
[15:06] <Noldorin> i think i have succeeded with bzr-git, but not dulwich...
[15:06] <jelmer> Noldorin: bzr-git doesn't require compilation
[15:07] <Noldorin> jelmer: indeed. just pasting it into c:\program files\bazaar\plugins seems to work
[15:07] <jelmer> Noldorin: you might want to ask on the mailing list about this issue, I'm afraid I don't know enough about the bzr windows installer
[15:07] <Noldorin> hmm ok
[15:08] <Noldorin> jelmer: by the look of it, i need to use VS 2003 to compile though no?
[15:08] <jelmer> Noldorin: Yeah, I think you need to compile with the same comp[iler that was used to compile the rest of bzr
[15:08] <Noldorin> unless i can somehow get bzr-git to use the *uncompiled* (python source) of dulwich
[15:08] <Noldorin> ok
[15:08]  * Noldorin thinks it should really be looking for VS 2008 nowadays
[15:08] <jelmer> Noldorin: Yeah, you should be able to use dulwich without the extension as well
[15:09] <jelmer> Noldorin: but that'll be slower
[15:09] <Noldorin> yeah..
[15:09] <Noldorin> not the biggrest problem atm
[15:09] <Noldorin> jelmer: any idea how to tell bzr-git to use dulwich source rather than binaries?
[15:09] <Noldorin> (if possible)
[15:09] <jelmer> to do that, copy the 'dulwich' directory from the dulwich source tarball to some path that is in your python path
[15:09] <jelmer> Noldorin: if the extensions aren't there it should just not use them
[15:10] <Noldorin> right
[15:11] <Noldorin> jelmer: in this case i now get...
[15:11] <Noldorin> No module named protocol
[15:11] <Noldorin> Unable to load plugin u'dulwich' from u'C:/Program Files/Bazaar/plugins'
[15:11] <Noldorin> bzr: ERROR: exceptions.AttributeError: 'InterRepository' object has no attribute
[15:11] <Noldorin>  'fetch_objects'
[15:11] <Noldorin> dulwich relies on a module called 'protocol' perhap?
[15:13] <jelmer> Noldorin: Where is the "No such protocol" bit raised from?
[15:13] <jelmer> ~/.bzr.log should be able to tell you
[15:14] <jelmer> Noldorin: You shouldn't install dulwich in your plugins directory
[15:14] <jelmer> (that might explain the error, actually)
[15:15] <Noldorin> jelmer: oh, there's a traceback too
[15:16] <Noldorin> jelmer: it iwsn't installed in plugins. at least, i don't think so
[15:16] <Noldorin> if it is, maybe i need to uninstall it somehow...
[15:16] <jelmer> Noldorin: the error suggests otherwise, is there no C:/Program Files/Bazaar/plugins/dulwich directory?
[15:16] <Noldorin> jelmer: nope :S
[15:16] <Noldorin> http://pastebin.com/m406420d5
[15:17] <jelmer> Noldorin: See line 4, there's a plugin there
[15:18] <Noldorin> jelmer: there is a C:/Program Files/Bazaar/plugins/git dir but definitely no C:/Program Files/Bazaar/plugins/dulwich :S
[15:18] <jelmer> Noldorin, do you still get that error if you remove the git directory ?
[15:18]  * Noldorin tries
[15:19] <Noldorin> jelmer: yep
[15:19] <Noldorin> slightly different but similar:
[15:19] <Noldorin> No module named dulwich.errors
[15:19] <Noldorin> Unable to load plugin u'dulwich' from u'C:/Program Files/Bazaar/plugins'
[15:19] <Noldorin> (dulwich.errors instead of protocol now)
[15:19] <jelmer> Noldorin: Any other places on your system where you might've installed dulwich ?
[15:20] <Noldorin> jelmer: i'll do a search
[15:27] <Noldorin> jelmer: this is really weird: windows explorer shows nothing in C:\program files\bazaar\plugins, but ls does :P
[15:28] <jelmer> well, that certainly explains a lot :-)
[15:28] <Noldorin> heh yep
[15:31] <Noldorin> jelmer: 'cannot find module' error is gone now :)
[15:31] <Noldorin> now just one more...
[15:31] <Noldorin> http://pastebin.com/m4ceb1ad2
[15:34] <Noldorin> jelmer: bzr-git should be using the dulwich source under c:\libs\dulwich-0.4.0
[15:35] <Noldorin> obviously, there is another version (compiled) under c:\cygwin\lib\python2.5\site-packages ...
[15:35] <Noldorin> but that's not being used i think
[15:41] <Noldorin> ping?
[15:53] <Noldorin> hi jelmer. what's the last message of mine you got?
 now just one more..
 Noldorin, what's left?
[15:58] <Noldorin> jelmer: http://pastebin.com/m75bfdf4c
[15:59] <Noldorin> jelmer: i.e. now i *only* have the error given in https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr-git/+bug/449507
[15:59] <Noldorin> (whereas before i had multiple errors)
[15:59] <jelmer> Noldorin: can you paste "bzr info" again for the source and target repositories?
[16:00] <jelmer> s/repositories/branches/
[16:00] <Noldorin> sure
[16:01] <Noldorin> jelmer: http://pastebin.com/m1bccdfbd
[16:01] <Noldorin> sorry, clipboard fail
[16:01] <Noldorin> try http://pastebin.com/m6f1205ca
[16:02] <Noldorin> jelmer: the second paste is correct
[16:04] <jelmer> Noldorin: I think you might need to upgrade to a rich root format before you can push
[16:04] <Noldorin> jelmer: hmm i see.
[16:04] <jelmer> Noldorin: The source branch, that is
[16:04] <Noldorin> no idea what that is/how to use it. :)\
[16:05] <jelmer> Noldorin: in the source branch, run "bzr upgrade --2a"
[16:05] <jelmer> and then try the dpush again
[16:06] <Noldorin> jelmer: could this cause any problems elsewhere?
[16:07] <jelmer> Noldorin: If you push to other branches they need to be in the 2a format (or something newer) as well
[16:07] <Noldorin> oh fair enough
[16:07] <Noldorin> well what's the newest?
[16:07] <Noldorin> i might as well upgrade to that :)
[16:09] <Noldorin> jelmer: "No new revisions to push." - i guess this means success
[16:11] <jelmer> Noldorin: 2a is the newest
[16:11] <Noldorin> ok great
[16:13] <Noldorin> jelmer: well, only issue remaining now is to push to github
[16:13] <Noldorin> i'm trying this:
[16:13] <Noldorin> C:\Users\Alex\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\IRC.NET\devel>bzr dpush git+
[16:13] <Noldorin> ssh://git@github.com:Noldorin/IRC.NET.git
[16:13] <Noldorin> Permission denied (publickey).
[16:13] <Noldorin> bzr: ERROR: The remote server unexpectedly closed the connection.
[16:15] <Noldorin> i have my SSH key in pageant, so i'm not sure of the problem...
[16:16] <jelmer> Noldorin, that's not a valid URL
[16:16] <jelmer> Noldorin, you need a / rather than a : after the hostname
[16:16] <Noldorin> ah right
[16:17] <Noldorin> same error...
[16:18] <jelmer> Noldorin: what error exactly?
[16:18] <Noldorin> what i just pasted: bzr: ERROR: The remote server unexpectedly closed the connection.
[16:18] <Noldorin> erm
[16:18] <Noldorin> Permission denied (publickey).
[16:19] <jelmer> bzr-git should be using the same ssh keys that bzr itself would use
[16:19] <Noldorin> that's what i thought hrm
[16:19] <Noldorin> must be the URL wrong still?
[16:19] <jelmer> no, the URL looks ok
[16:19] <jelmer> Noldorin is your username on github?
[16:19] <Noldorin> jelmer: yes
[16:19] <Noldorin> jelmer: the project is http://github.com/Noldorin/IRC.NET
[16:20] <jelmer> Noldorin: No idea then, sorry
[16:21] <Noldorin> no worries
[16:23] <Noldorin> jelmer: maybe i need to do http://github.com/blog/180-local-github-config ?
[16:25] <jelmer> Noldorin: no, the API isn't relevant here
[16:25] <jelmer> and bzr-git doesn't use the git config
[17:04] <Noldorin> jelmer: hmm. who *should* i ask about this then?
[17:04] <Noldorin> it doesn't seem to be a git problem heh
[17:04] <jelmer> Noldorin: does pushing to e.g. launchpad work ok?
[17:04] <jelmer> does pushing using git to github work?
[17:05] <Noldorin> jelmer: yep
[17:05] <Noldorin> in both cases, no problemxs
[17:06] <jelmer> Noldorin: the other people on the general mailing list or on the bzr-windows mailing list might have aan idea
[17:06] <Noldorin> ok
[17:06] <Noldorin> it's odd tha this problem should be occuring
[17:06] <Noldorin> jelmer: i just tend to think if you, the author of the lib, doesn't know, then who does ;)
[17:06] <Noldorin> maybe i can turn on verbose to get some debugging info or such?
[17:07] <jelmer> Noldorin, I haven't written the ssh bits
[17:07] <jelmer> Noldorin: we're just calling out to the generic functionality in bzrlib for that
[17:07] <jelmer> and there's windows-specific code in bzrlib for handling ssh
[17:08] <Noldorin> jelmer: mm, fair enough
[17:08] <Noldorin> jelmer: it would be helpful to see *which* ssh key it's trying to use though
[17:08] <Noldorin> if i can somehow
[17:14] <Noldorin> jelmer: i will try #git, then maybe the mailing list. thanks for all your help :)
[17:14] <jelmer> Noldorin: does ssh'ing into that server work?
[17:15] <Noldorin> i look forward to the next release of bzr-git..
[17:15] <Noldorin> jelmer: erm...will try now
[17:18] <Noldorin> jelmer: "no supporteed auth methods available"
[17:18] <Noldorin> on putty
[17:19] <jelmer> Noldorin: looks like the keys aren't available
[17:19] <Noldorin> jelmer: well pageant is running, and i can push to bzr
[17:19] <Noldorin> launchpad*
[17:19] <jelmer> Noldorin: github doesn't seem to have them then
[17:20] <Noldorin> ah
[17:20] <Noldorin> hm
[17:20] <Noldorin> jelmer: oh, it seems i *cannot* push with normal bzr to launchpad now :S
[17:21] <fullermd> You upgraded in the middle?
[17:22] <Noldorin> fullermd: what do you mean?
[17:22] <fullermd> Since the last time you could.
[17:22] <Noldorin> upgrade the branch, yep
[17:27] <fullermd> No, upgrade bzr.
[17:28] <fullermd> Specifically, across 2.0.0, which stopped using Putty as the default ssh implementation on Windows.
[17:29] <Noldorin> fullermd: oh i see.
[17:29] <Noldorin> yes i have indeed
[17:31] <Noldorin> fullermd: so how can i tell it to use putty/pageant now?
[17:31] <Noldorin> or should i be using something else?
[17:32] <fullermd> BZR_SSH env variable (or some name like that)
[17:42] <Noldorin> fullermd: set BZR_SSH = plink for putty right?
[17:44] <fullermd> Your guess is as good as mine   8-}
[17:44] <Noldorin> fullermd: gah, i get an error 2 now :(
[17:44] <Noldorin> when pushing
[17:44] <Noldorin> bzr: ERROR: [Error 2] The system cannot find the file specified
[17:45] <jelmer> Noldorin: bzr can't find the ssh/plink executable locally I think
[17:45] <fullermd> Rule 16: If you can't solve the problem, redefine the error.
[17:45] <fullermd> My work here is done.
[17:45] <Noldorin> jelmer: i need to put c:\program files\putty in my path then?
[17:46] <Noldorin> fullermd: :P
[17:46] <Noldorin> hehe
[17:50] <Noldorin> jelmer, fullermd: http://pastebin.com/m1064404a - hmm?
[17:52] <fullermd> 'bout what it says, I reckon.
[17:52] <fullermd> You can't interact with the ssh process through bzr, so you can't agree to accept the host key.  Have to invoke it manually to do that.
[17:52] <Noldorin> fullermd: seems to be thsi problem here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/237297
[17:52] <Noldorin> but i don't understand the solution
[17:53] <fullermd> Use plink to manually connect to LP, so you ahve to chance to accept the key.
[18:01] <Noldorin> fullermd: meh, seems i should really be using paramiko now
[18:01] <Noldorin> installed it, but i see no info how to configure it for my key :S
[18:01] <Noldorin> documentation is somewhat lacking there it seems
[18:05] <Noldorin> bah
[18:05] <Noldorin> putty was so much easier to use
[18:08]  * fullermd finds openssh nice and easy to use   :p
[18:08] <Noldorin> fullermd: yeah, it's all good on linux, but windows is a different story :P
[18:09] <Noldorin> fullermd: if you can point me to a guide for paramiko on windows, that would be good heh
[18:09] <luks> Noldorin: how did you use your key with putty?
[18:09] <Noldorin> luks: just ran pageant and added the PPK file
[18:09] <luks> the same will work for paramiko
[18:09] <luks> it will use the key from pageant
[18:09] <Noldorin> doesn't seem to :(
[18:11] <Noldorin> luks: Permission denied (publickey).
[18:12] <luks> I'm afraid I can't help with finding the problem, but it's supposed to work
[18:12] <luks> (I know, because I submitted a patch for bzr a long time ago to enable it)
[18:13] <Noldorin> ah right
[18:13] <Noldorin> hrm
[18:15] <Noldorin> luks: who might be able to suggest a solution then?
[18:16] <fullermd> jam might be a good bet.  He may be back around tomorrow.
[18:16] <Noldorin> ok
[18:16] <Noldorin> thanks anyway
[18:23] <luks> Noldorin: check your .bzr.log
[18:23] <luks> it should say that it's using paramiko, and then list all available keys in messages like "Trying SSH agent key ..."
[18:24] <Noldorin> luks: hrm
[18:24] <Noldorin> 3.000  ssh implementation is OpenSSH
[18:24] <Noldorin> could be the problem :P
[18:24] <luks> :)
[18:24] <Noldorin> i thought it default to paramiko though, no?
[18:24] <luks> I don't know
[18:24] <luks> BZR_SSH=paramiko should fix it
[18:24] <Noldorin> yep, just doing that now
[18:27] <Noldorin> luks: success. thanks very much
[18:27] <luks> I just noticed that you mentioned you were using cygwin
[18:27] <luks> adding the key to your cygwin's ssh config would be another solution
[18:28] <Noldorin> luks: was just using cygwin to compile stuff
[18:28] <Noldorin> normally on native windows though
[18:28] <luks> is it not in %PATH%?
[18:28] <Noldorin> it is
[18:28] <luks> it obviously tried *some* openssh ssh client
[18:28] <Noldorin> mm
[18:33] <Noldorin> ok, so it's just github not recognising my ssh key now...
[18:35] <Noldorin> bah
[18:40] <saedelaere> hi, when i do [bzr info] i see among other things
[18:40] <saedelaere> "Repository branch (format: unnamed)"
[18:41] <saedelaere> what does "format: unnamed" mean, and is this ok?
[18:41] <fullermd> Yes, it's fine.
[18:41] <fullermd> It means bzr doesn't have a rollup name for what you have there.
[18:42] <saedelaere> hm, ok. because the original branch on my computer shows
[18:42] <saedelaere> "Standalone tree (format: pack-0.92)"
[18:43] <fullermd> If you branch that standalone with a current bzr, you'll still have that repo format, and (I think) that branch format, but you'll have the new WT format.  Thus, unnamed.
[18:44] <maxb> Use bzr info -v for individual format information on repo, branch and WT
[18:45] <maxb> 'unnamed' is dramatically unhelpful, I wish it said something like 'pack-0.92+wt6'
[18:46] <Noldorin> hrm, i still seem to be having the wrong URL format for bzr-git:
[18:46] <Noldorin> git+ssh://git@github.com/Noldorin/IRC.NET.git
[18:46] <saedelaere> ok, thank you very much.
[18:50] <fullermd> maxb: Well, but it would actually be pack-0.92-wt4+wt6 or something.  Falls over soon's you wander off the beam.
[18:56] <maxb> huh?
[18:56] <maxb> It can't be wt4 and wt6 simultaneously
[18:56] <fullermd> Thus my point   :p
[19:00] <maxb> um?
[19:00] <maxb> By pack-0.92+wt6 I mean pack-0.92 modified by the wt version being replaced by 6
[19:01] <fullermd> Sure, but + doesn't mean modify, it means add.  So you have to subtract wt4 before you can add wt6.
[19:02] <maxb> I am less strictly algebraic
[19:04] <Peng> Bazaar doesn't track that it used to be WT4.
[19:04] <Peng> Best you can do is a heuristic.
[19:09] <lifeless> fullermd: that sounds confusing
[19:09] <fullermd> That would be the meta-point...
[19:10] <lifeless> fullermd: as each slot can only be filled once I don't see why you'd need a - operator
[19:10] <fullermd> Whole point of a rollup name is to avoid combinatorics.  Adding combinatorics to the rollup kinda squirrels up the idea.
[19:23] <lifeless> fullermd: that I don't agree with
[19:24] <maxb> IMO, anything less vague than 'unnamed' is an improvement
[19:30] <Peng> That reminds me, someone should file a bug about it saying "format: unnamed" for remote branches...
[19:31] <lifeless> Peng: no, someone should fix it :P
[19:32] <Peng> Yes, but if that someone is me, the former is much more likely than the latter. :P
[19:38] <maxb> Didn't someone say it was fixed in bzr.dev?
[19:40] <fullermd> Not exactly.
[19:40] <fullermd> It reads the real format names over the smart protocol now.
[19:40] <Peng> maxb: The detailed information is useful now (e.g. "branch: Remote: Branch format 7"), but the summary is not.
[19:41] <fullermd> But since it never reads WT's remotely, it doesn't get that format, so there's never a matching rollup name.
[19:41] <maxb> ah
[19:41] <Peng> Oh.
[19:57] <lifeless> fullermd: huh, its not about reading WT's remotely.
[19:57] <lifeless> fullermd: its just info being borked.
[19:58] <fullermd> Howzat?  There's no defined rollup format name without a WT format, is there?
[19:58] <fullermd> So how would you expect to ever get anything but 'unnamed'?
[20:05] <lifeless> fullermd: try it locally
[20:16] <fullermd> Try it remotely locally?
[20:21] <lifeless> try it locally locally
[20:21] <lifeless> bzr init; bzr remove-tree; bzr info
[20:29] <fullermd> Bah.
[20:36] <lifeless> fullermd: do you see ?
[20:39] <Peng> init --no-tree still isn't supported?
[20:39] <Peng> Heh, thought that'd been changed.
[21:31] <Noldorin> hi jelmer
[22:16] <jelmer> Noldorin: hi
[22:36] <Noldorin> jelmer: not sure if you got the messages, but i think aLmost evrything is sorted now...
[22:36] <Noldorin> everything, except it's regusing my ssh key it seems.
[22:36] <jelmer> Noldorin, cool
[22:37] <Noldorin> what's the URL meant to be for github repos?
[22:37] <Noldorin> i'm currently using git+ssh://Noldorin@github.com/IRC.NET.git
[22:37] <Noldorin> erm
[22:37] <Noldorin>  git+ssh://git@github.com/Noldorin/IRC.NET.git
[22:37] <Noldorin> but if wonder if this is wrong
[22:42] <jelmer> that seems right
[22:42] <jelmer> I'm using something similar to push to github
[22:43] <Noldorin> jelmer: i've set things up to use paramiko with pageant....
[22:43] <Noldorin> perhap's it's not communicating right?
[22:43] <Noldorin> hmm ok
[22:43] <Noldorin> C:\Users\Alex\Documents\Visual Studio 2010\Projects\IRC.NET\devel>bzr dpush git+
[22:43] <Noldorin> ssh://git@github.com/Noldorin/IRC.NET.git
[22:43] <Noldorin> Permission denied (publickey).
[22:43] <Noldorin> bzr: ERROR: The remote server unexpectedly closed the connection.
[22:45] <jelmer> Noldorin, did you manage to get pushing to launchpad working again?
[22:52] <spiv> Good morning