[00:02] <Lure> ScottK: any time to sponsor strigi build1 upload for exiv2 library transition: http://muse.19inch.net/~lure/strigi.diff ?
[00:05] <Riddell> Lure: I can do that
[00:05] <Lure> Riddell: fine with me ;-)
[00:06] <Lure> I just saw ScottK nick...
[00:07] <Riddell> done
[00:09] <Lure> Riddell: thanks
[00:12] <claydoh> ScottK: sorry my laptop somehow overheated :(
[00:12] <claydoh> ScottK: http://paste.ubuntu.com/352038/
[00:12] <claydoh> how does that look? assuming bbcode and not html
[00:15] <Riddell> "  libexiv2-dev: Depends: libexiv2-6 (= 0.19-1) but it is not installable
[00:15] <Riddell> "
[00:15] <Riddell> huh?
[00:16] <Riddell> Lure: something broken with libexiv?
[00:17] <Lure> Riddell: universe packages built w/o problems
[00:17] <Lure> Riddell: which arch?
[00:17] <Riddell> i386
[00:17] <Riddell> and amd64
[00:19] <Lure> Riddell: I have it installed on my lucid/i386...
[00:19] <Lure> Riddell: and several universe packages build with it in past couple of hours
[00:20] <Lure> Riddell: ups, binary package was not promoted to main
[00:20] <Lure> Riddell: can you do that?
[00:20] <Lure> libexiv2-6
[00:21]  * Lure thought that this is done automatically for main packages
[00:21] <Riddell> hmm, I'm sure I did
[00:21] <Riddell> queue override -c main binary libexiv2-6
[00:21] <Riddell> that's in the history
[00:21] <Riddell> it's done manually
[00:22] <Riddell> Lure: done (again)
[00:22] <Riddell> we'll need to rebuild after the next publisher run
[00:23] <Lure> Riddell: ok, I can retry build in the morning, need to go to bed now
[00:23] <Riddell> me too
[00:52] <freeflying> Riddell: sorry, no
[00:56] <ScottK> claydoh: Published.  FWIW, for kubuntu.org stuff it's actual html that's needed, not wiki format.
[00:56] <ScottK> Thanks.
[00:57] <claydoh> ScottK: thought it might be bbcode in a drupal editor, I will remember that one
[00:57] <ScottK> Easy enough to change.  No problem.
[00:58] <claydoh> now to see why my laptop is getting hot :(
[02:47] <ScottK> nixternal: Can haz powerpc?
[04:10] <ScottK> nixternal: Nevermind
[04:12] <ScottK> amarok built on powerpc ....
[04:16] <shtylman> ScottK: has turned into a lolcat...hmmm
[04:16]  * ScottK is full of suprised.
[04:17] <ScottK> d/s
[04:31] <maco> ScottK: http://cuteoverload.com/2010/01/02/10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1/
[04:31] <ScottK> Noting the domain name, do I want to look?
[04:36] <ScottK> So I looked.
[04:36] <maco> particularly the long string of "kittehs can sleep anywhere" that is #1
[04:36] <ScottK> Just so I don't lose my reputation as the buzzkill, I'm mention that cats do http://cuteoverload.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/downloadedfile-7.jpeg because the tire is nice and warm.  When the car moved, it's bad.
[04:36]  * ScottK lost a cat to that exact thing growing up.
[04:37] <maco> O_O
[05:10] <shtylman> prettified unlock screen: http://apt.shtylman.com/stuff/unlock.png
[05:23] <maco> shtylman: next question: will it accept correct passwords or will i need to go to a tty and killall kscreenlocker still?
[05:25] <shtylman> maco: huh?
[05:26] <shtylman> um... mine works...
[05:26] <shtylman> im a bit confused at the question?
[05:26] <maco> oh it only accepts correct passwords for me sometimes
[05:26] <maco> and once it rejects the correct password once, it will do so until i've rebooted
[05:26] <maco> then it might (or might not) work after the reboot
[05:27] <maco> i even have an alias unlock="killall kscreenlocker"
[05:27] <shtylman> interesting...
[05:27] <shtylman> don't answer..but ponder to yourself... doesn't your password have any weird characters in it?
[05:27] <maco> been this way for months. seen people complain about it in #kubuntu too
[05:27] <maco> only one, and its not very odd
[05:28] <maco> i mean, its ascii, not utf-8 wackiness
[05:28] <shtylman> hmm
[05:28] <maco> i do not need the compose key to type my password, so thats not it :P
[05:28] <shtylman> is there an open bug on it?
[05:28] <maco> i have no idea
[05:28] <maco> i thought it was a known one, its been around so long
[05:29] <shtylman> the trick with bugs like that is they either have to be easily reproducable... or effect a developer enough for them to investigate it
[05:29] <shtylman> I often find that some bugs are valid...if...you know... one could ever reproduce it :)
[05:29] <kb9vqf> custom PAM stack?
[05:30]  * kb9vqf gets that too with Kerberos logins
[05:30] <maco> i do have a krb-auth'd process running since i use openafs, but my login is a local one. this is my laptop i'm talking about
[05:31] <kb9vqf> so you've changed /etc/pam.d/common-auth then?
[05:31]  * ScottK has never seen anything like that
[05:31] <maco> kb9vqf: no
[05:31] <kb9vqf> then I'm out of ideas already :)
[05:32] <maco> kb9vqf: i type "kadmin" and other such nonsense commands that i can never remember on my own
[05:33]  * kb9vqf knows that kdesktop_lock is very picky about what it receives from PAM
[05:33] <maco> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdebase-workspace/+bug/434276
[05:33] <maco> oooh there's a workaround in there
[05:34] <maco> i will have to check my /etc/shadow's group when i can turn my laptop on again
[05:35] <maco> if thats the issue, then i wonder why it does sometimes work
[06:46] <shtylman> http://apt.shtylman.com/stuff/login.mpeg
[06:46] <shtylman> the whole process from start to finish :)
[07:49] <Lure> Riddell: ^^^
[08:37] <amichair> shtylman: out of curiosity, what do u use to make the video-snapshot?
[08:37] <amichair> shtylman: btw, nice kubuntu icon :-)
[09:36] <skamster> hello all
[09:37] <skamster> as i read on the pykde-section on kde.org, here are some pykde-dev's?
[09:37] <skamster> i've a problem for 2 days..
[09:38] <skamster> this is my code
[09:38] <skamster> http://pastebin.com/m2978ab0b
[09:39] <skamster> i went to fetch akonadi-items, but my list is always empty..
[09:39] <skamster> akonadi-output looks good: (6614) Akonadi::SessionPrivate::jobDone: Akonadi::ItemFetchJob(0xe37490) Non-current job finished.
[09:39] <skamster> had someone anything done in this part yet?
[09:40] <skamster> could someone gave me a easy example?
[09:43] <skamster> no pykdedevs here?
[09:53] <agateau> Sput: ping
[09:54] <Sput> agateau: will be available in half an hour or so
[09:54]  * Sput is about to reach the train station
[09:54] <agateau> Sput: patch for you available here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/quassel/+bug/502409
[09:56] <agateau> Sput: just ping me back later when you have time then
[09:57] <Sput> agateau: looks fine, will apply later, thx
[10:01] <Sput> agateau: wondering if the path needs to be quoted in CMake thoug
[10:01] <Sput> h
[10:01] <Sput> just in case it contains spaces
[10:02] <Sput> I think we pass a path via -D somewhere else; should have a look at how we did it there
[10:06] <agateau> Sput: will have a look, but I think you should consider using a generated header file
[10:06] <agateau> it's much safer this way
[10:07] <agateau> Sput: (cf cmake configure_file command)
[10:24] <tseliot> Riddell: do you think my fix for bug #503736 is ok? (see the bzr branch linked to the bug report)
[10:27] <tseliot> it's a one line change that makes jockey-kde (and other packages, I guess) build again
[10:27] <tseliot> it might be worth reporting the problem upstream
[10:31] <tseliot> or agateau ^^
[10:31]  * agateau reads
[10:37] <Riddell> tseliot: I don't see a bzr branch linked from there?
[10:37] <Riddell> kdebindings hasn't yet been updated for KDE 4.4, that's on my todo list but it's possible this fix is in there already
[10:37] <tseliot> Riddell: weird, it's under related branches: https://code.launchpad.net/~albertomilone/ubuntu/lucid/kdebindings/kdebindings-fix-pykdeuic4
[10:38] <tseliot> the problem is that this is blocking jockey
[10:39] <Lure> Riddell: can you give-back https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strigi/0.7.0-1build1/
[10:40] <Riddell> tseliot: looks fine to upload although the changelog is for an old version and it's better to have it as a patch than edit the code directly
[10:43] <tseliot> Riddell: the changelog is from the lucid bazaar branch. Or are you referring to the fact that the library hasn't been updated yet?
[10:44] <tseliot> I can add my change as a patch, this is definitely not a problem for me
[10:45] <Riddell> "kdebindings (4:4.2.95-0ubuntu3)" that's not the version in lucid
[10:45] <Riddell> that bzr branch must be behind
[10:45] <Riddell> tseliot: use ~kubuntu-members/kdebindings/ubuntu if you could
[10:47] <tseliot> Riddell: I'm using bzr only to try the instructions on the DistributedDevelopment wiki page. I can make the changes to that branch of yours and then upload manually if you prefer so
[10:48] <tseliot> as the wiki assumes that lp:ubuntu/kdebindings is up-to-date
[10:49] <Riddell> I think that's an assumption too far :)
[10:49] <tseliot> heh, ok
[10:49] <Riddell> tseliot: go with ~kubuntu-members/kdebindings/ubuntu if you want to upload, I can merge it in if you make a branch
[10:50] <tseliot> alright
[10:56] <tseliot> Riddell: how come the latest version is 4:4.3.3-0ubuntu1~ppa2 ? I guess I can safely bump it to 4:4.3.3-0ubuntu2, right?
[10:58] <tseliot> of course I expect an answer only to the latter ;)
[11:02] <Riddell> tseliot: the version in lucid is 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu4.1
[11:03] <tseliot> Riddell: the one in lp:~kubuntu-members/kdebindings/ubuntu is what I mentioned above
[11:03] <tseliot> it looks like an upload was reverted
[11:03] <Riddell> oh hmm, what a mess
[11:04] <Riddell> tseliot: just get rid of that changelog entry and add one for 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu5
[11:05] <tseliot> Riddell: ok
[12:06] <tseliot> Riddell: ok, I pushed to this branch. Let me know if I can upload: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~albertomilone/ubuntu/lucid/kdebindings/kdebindings-fix-kde-i18n-string
[12:07] <Riddell> tseliot: looks good, please upload
[12:07] <Riddell> tseliot: I'll merge into ~kubuntu-members
[12:07] <tseliot> Riddell: ok, thanks
[12:08] <Riddell> tseliot: KDE SC 4.4 RC is due out today so I'll make sure and get kdebindings packaged from that and check if this change is in it or no
[12:09] <Riddell> humph, bzr doesn't want to merge "different rich-root support"
[12:12] <tseliot> Riddell: d'oh
[12:13] <Riddell> I did it manually
[12:13] <tseliot> fortunately the change was trivial
[12:14] <tseliot> Riddell: ok, uploaded (my 1st upload as a core-dev)
[12:14] <tseliot> and yes, I hope the RC has that fix already
[12:16] <Riddell> tseliot: congratulations on your first upload!
[12:16] <tseliot> thanks :-)
[12:19] <Riddell> revu needed http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/libdbusmenu-qt
[12:19] <Riddell> Quintasan: are you into revuing yet? ^^
[12:30] <Riddell> shtylman: nice bling on the login there
[12:30] <Riddell> shown it to pinheiro?
[13:09] <Riddell> hmm, quassel doesn't get merged with Debian?
[13:12] <Riddell> neversfelde: I take it we don't want choqok 1.0 alpha 2 in the archive?
[13:37] <freeflying> Riddell: no section in Source?
[13:39] <Riddell> freeflying: it has "Section: libs"
[13:40] <freeflying> Riddell: my fault :)
[13:40] <Riddell> although I do think Sections should be done away with
[13:58] <JontheEchidna> Riddell: for libdbusmenu-qt, is there any reason pkg-kde-tools is a build-depend? I don't see that it's being used
[14:06] <tseliot> Riddell: more fun :-/ http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37495769/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.kdebindings_4:4.3.2-0ubuntu5_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[14:06] <Riddell> nerk
[14:08] <Riddell> tseliot: let me try that in a chroot
[14:09] <tseliot> Riddell: ok. It worked in pbuilder this morning...
[14:09] <Riddell> JontheEchidna: you're right, I'll remove that
[14:09] <JontheEchidna> Riddell: cool. Otherwise it looks good to me
[14:15] <Riddell> gosh kb9vqf is busy on revu
[14:18] <JontheEchidna> I'm thinking that we should split soprano-backend-virtuoso out into a separate package and have soprano-daemon depend on soprano-backend, which our two current backend packages would provide
[14:18] <JontheEchidna> Guess I just volunteered to do -runtime this time around :P
[14:19] <Riddell> JontheEchidna: does soprano-backend-sesame still work?
[14:19] <JontheEchidna> I couldn't really get it to work, actually
[14:19] <JontheEchidna> I'd be fine with trashing it, come to think of it
[14:19] <Riddell> I've removed the patch from -runtime for the restricted installer popup
[14:20] <JontheEchidna> so maybe it'd be pointless to make a backend-package system in that case
[14:21] <Riddell> I think I'd be for just scrapping sesame and having soprano depend on virtuoso
[14:21] <JontheEchidna> yeah
[14:22] <JontheEchidna> btw, our CDs are oversized as it is, virtuoso will add ~3MB more to that
[14:22] <txwikinger> Riddell: sent some snow over here... you have more than we have ;)
[14:24] <Riddell> JontheEchidna: depressing isn't it.  I think .5MB can be dropped from virtuoso-drivers by removing the ones it doesn't need
[14:25] <Riddell> txwikinger: send some salt over here, we're running out
[14:25] <txwikinger> ROFL
[14:25] <txwikinger> Well.. we only use salt until -10C ... if it is lower we use sand
[14:26] <JontheEchidna> Debian has a "virutoso-minimal" package that has the intention of being only what soprano needs. I don't know if it has everything though since we never got 6.0.x working
[14:35] <ScottK> ryanakca: http://bangarangkde.wordpress.com/2010/01/05/bangarang-1-0-release-candidate/
[14:42] <Riddell> tseliot: I uploaded kdebindings with boost1.40
[14:42] <tseliot> Riddell: perfect, thanks
[15:13] <shtylman> Riddell: havn't shown him the video yet
[15:13] <shtylman> but did send him the screencap of the kdm theme
[15:14] <Riddell> that wallpaper still hurts my eyes
[15:14] <neversfelde> Riddell: not sure, afaik debian has the alpha version only. I can talk to upstream and see what they would prefer?
[15:14] <shtylman> Riddell: yea... we will need to desaturate
[15:15] <Riddell> neversfelde: that would be good
[15:15] <Riddell> shtylman: I'm unconvinced even that will help but we'll see what pinheiro comes up with
[15:16] <neversfelde> Riddell: will take some time, because mtux has to absolve his military service
[15:16] <shtylman> Riddell: we shall see
[15:16] <shtylman> the themes can easily be changed if needed
[15:16] <shtylman> so thats good
[15:16] <Riddell> neversfelde: hmm, nasty
[15:42] <ScottK> NCommander: Our python-qt3 is currently uninstallable due to SIP.  That could stand a look too....
[15:42] <NCommander> ScottK, ugh, why's it uninstallable?
[15:42] <ScottK> (Since you're running and hiding from #debian-qt-kde)
[15:42] <ScottK> SIP version is too high
[15:45] <JontheEchidna> Riddell: mind if I copy your endorsement on my kubuntu-dev app to my core-dev app?
[15:45] <ScottK> I think you'd want him to enhance it some.
[15:45] <ScottK> JontheEchidna: Did I write you one already?
[15:45] <JontheEchidna> ScottK: yeah
[15:46] <ScottK> OK.  Good.
[15:47] <Riddell> JontheEchidna: sure
[15:47] <JontheEchidna> Riddell: if you could enhance it a bit, that'd be nice too. :)
[15:47] <Riddell> ok
[15:47] <JontheEchidna> thanks
[15:48] <JontheEchidna> https://wiki.kubuntu.org/JonathanThomas/CoreDevApplication
[15:48] <Riddell> tseliot: ug kdebindings fails in nasty ways, this may have to wait until the RC gets tagged so we can do a proper update
[15:48] <tseliot> Riddell: ok, probably it's better this way. At least we tried ;)
[16:22] <agateau> Which version of kde will be in alpha2?
[16:22]  * agateau needs to rebase patches, better rebase against the right version...
[16:23] <agateau> ScottK: ^ any idea?
[16:23] <ScottK> agateau: 4.4 rc1.
[16:23] <agateau> ScottK: ok thanks!
[16:28] <Daskreech> Does anyone know of a kmmoney4 ppa ?
[16:29] <genii> Weird, kdm isn't auto-starting now after latest update, although: sudo start kdm   works after console login. (10.04 64bit, KDE 4.3.85)
[16:30] <JontheEchidna> genii: yeah, hal funkiness. A fix will come with 4.4 RC1
[16:32] <freinhard> is there a successor of project neon? looks somewhat out of date
[16:34] <genii> JontheEchidna: OK, cool. Nothing critical, just annoying...
[16:34] <JontheEchidna> yeah...
[16:48] <JontheEchidna> Is anybody that uses proprietary drivers also running lucid?
[16:55] <genii> JontheEchidna: I'm using nvidia-vdpau ppa drivers
[16:56] <JontheEchidna> genii: do those show up in jockey?
[16:56] <genii> JontheEchidna: Lemme check
[16:57] <genii> JontheEchidna: Yup (the 195)
[16:57] <JontheEchidna> cool
[16:58] <JontheEchidna> could you run /usr/bin/jockey-kde and see if you can install/uininstall the drivers?
[16:58] <JontheEchidna> e.g., don't let kdesudo come up
[16:59] <JontheEchidna> I want to see if jockey's policykit stuff works now that KDE has a polkit-1 frontend. I'd test it myself but my only proprietary hardware has bit the dust
[16:59] <Riddell> tseliot was doing something with jockey earlier, it won't build because of kdebindings larks
[17:01] <JontheEchidna> I'm seeing if we can remove the Substitute UID key from jockey's .desktop file
[17:01] <JontheEchidna> and it looks like we can, according to jockey's changelog file
[17:01] <genii> JontheEchidna: Ok,  hangon (working here, apologies on lag)
[17:02] <JontheEchidna> genii: no prob, thanks. If everything goes well installing/uninstalling should pop up a kde policykit dialog
[17:03] <genii> JontheEchidna: "System policy prevents ..." passwd prompt
[17:03] <JontheEchidna> hmm
[17:03] <txwikinger> Which package contains the translations for kaddressbook again?
[17:06] <JontheEchidna> genii: nevermind, looks like the change I was wanting to make is already present in bzr :)
[17:06] <genii> JontheEchidna: I don't want to actually remove that driver though, it's the only one which actually works on my box... lag... OK, great
[17:06] <JontheEchidna> thanks for testing
[17:07] <genii> No problemmo
[17:07] <JontheEchidna> I hope jockey builds soon, not having to muck around with kdesudo to just start it will be sweet
[17:07] <JontheEchidna> oh, that being said the jockey-kde package should probably depend on polkit-kde-1 now
[17:08] <Riddell> txwikinger: kdepim
[17:09] <nixternal> ScottK: ppc up and running...my dog must have unplugged it
[17:10] <ScottK> nixternal: Thanks.
[17:10] <ScottK> nixternal: udev got installable and amarok built, so progress.
[17:27] <freinhard> what does one want to use instead of amarok-nightly-tools on karmic?
[17:28] <freinhard> got some strange bug in kopete with otr i'd like to fix, but don't want to mess up my system with "make install" stuff
[17:29] <neversfelde> freinhard: how about a chroot?
[17:30] <freinhard> anything that's easy to setup and does the job
[17:31] <neversfelde> freinhard: I would use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebootstrapChroot for this
[17:32] <freinhard> 6month release cycle has some bad side effects, wiki's look badly outdated quite fast
[17:33] <freinhard> a chroot doesn't work like a sandbox, right?
[17:34] <neversfelde> freinhard: uh, sorry I am not an expert there
[17:35] <freinhard> last time i used a chroot was some years a go when i installed gentoo, but everything needs to be setup in the chroot, so you can't use anything from "outside". i remember gentoo used a sandbox to build and install packages. the build process "sees" everything from outside but can't write to the actual filesystem, that goes somewhere else
[17:38] <neversfelde> freinhard: the link I have posted provides a way to use applications from the chroot in the real environment
[17:45] <freinhard> i gues i'll just install a vm
[18:02] <Riddell> RC tagging confirmed due tonight
[18:07] <nixternal> dirk] ok, tarballs finished, uploading  <- Riddell :)
[18:07] <Riddell> nixternal: oh?  where's that?
[18:07] <nixternal> can't tell you
[18:07] <nixternal> there
[18:07] <Riddell> oh, really, secrets now is it? :)
[18:08] <nixternal> it used to be
[18:11] <Riddell> nixternal: nothing on ktown
[18:12] <nixternal> yeah, he is just starting to upload
[18:12] <nixternal> tarballs are finished
[18:15] <nixternal> drwxr-xr-x    2 root     root           48 Jan  6 18:36 4.3.87
[18:15] <nixternal> drwxrwx---    2 ftprelease packager       48 Jan  6 18:36 4.3.90
[18:15] <nixternal> Riddell: which on?
[18:15] <nixternal> which one rather?
[18:15] <nixternal> .87 or .90 is next
[18:16] <JontheEchidna> .90 is next
[18:17] <JontheEchidna> numbers that aren't divisible by 5 are usually weekly snapshots
[18:22] <JontheEchidna> 4.3.90 folder is present, but no tars yet. Guess they're still uploading
[18:31] <JontheEchidna> ScottK: any news from canonical folks on libssh?
[18:36] <ScottK> JontheEchidna: On the list, not at the top of it yet
[18:36] <JontheEchidna> :(
[18:39] <Riddell> !ninjas
[18:40] <Riddell> ~ninjas
[18:40] <maco> you're online?
[18:40] <maco> quassel says you're offline. how silly.
[18:40] <neversfelde> Help? :)
[18:40] <neversfelde> still no internet connection here :(
[18:41] <neversfelde> I can probably do some minor jobs with this UMTS stick
[18:41] <maco> i have neither packaging tools nor ssh/gpg keys here :(
[18:42] <maco> the computers with those are A) 250mi away or B) not able to be powered on
[18:42] <Riddell> neversfelde: how about oxygen-icons? :)
[18:48]  * jussi01 waves
[18:48]  * jussi01 waves again
[18:48]  * jussi01 is somewhat excited....
[18:49]  * jussi01 has an announcement to make! 
[18:50]  * Nightrose wonders which
[18:50] <jussi01> Today my GF and I got engaged! :D
[18:50] <Nightrose> wohooooooooooo
[18:50] <JontheEchidna> \o/
[18:50] <Nightrose> congrats :)
[18:50] <ulysses__> congratulation jussi01 :)
[18:50] <jussi01> Ive  smile from ear to ear!
[18:50] <Nightrose> haha i can see it here!
[18:51] <nixternal> well, since eveyrone said congrats, I guess I will be real
[18:51] <jussi01> thanks Nightrose & ulysses__
[18:51] <nixternal> jussi01: sorry to hear that
[18:51] <nixternal> muhahahahah!!!! )*#)*@@!!!
[18:51] <jussi01> haha
[18:51]  * Nightrose pokes nixternal hard
[18:51] <Nightrose> :D
[18:51] <nixternal> hahaha
[18:51] <nixternal> come on, that was funny
[18:51] <nixternal> I had to do it
[18:51] <Nightrose> ;-)
[18:51] <jussi01> /mode +b %nixternal*!*@*
[18:51] <jussi01> :D
[18:51] <nixternal> that would do it, as I couldn't unban myself in here
[18:51] <jussi01> hehe
[18:53]  * Riddell hugs jussi01
[18:53]  * jussi01 hugs Riddell back!
[18:53] <maco> jussi01: congrats!
[18:53] <ulysses__> nixternal: however it's a good joke (:
[18:54] <maco> nixternal: i'm gonna guess you're divorced or headed there?
[18:54] <nixternal> I have been divorced for almost 10 years now
[18:54] <maco> figures
[18:55] <jussi01> nixternal: this is my second time ;)
[18:55] <nixternal> seriously?
[18:55] <nixternal> then you should know better! :p
[18:55] <nixternal> jussi01: you have been married before? you are an old fart then I take it
[18:56] <jussi01> nixternal: 27
[18:56] <nixternal> ahh, not an old fart yet
[18:57] <jussi01> nixternal: thanks for the clarification.... :P
[18:57] <nixternal> haha
[19:01] <Nightrose> lol
[19:28] <neversfelde> Riddell: sorry, I cannot get my desktop working with that UMTS stick, so I can't do oxygen icons :(
[19:37] <Riddell> neversfelde: it was a joke, I wouldn't want you doing a 120MB package over a mobile connection :)
[19:38] <neversfelde> Riddell: hehe, did no know that it has this size :)
[19:54] <Quintasan|Szel> jussi01: gratz, but what major achivement you pulled out? :)
[19:54] <Quintasan|Szel> pulled off rather
[19:55] <jussi01> Quintasan|Szel: I got engaged.
[19:55] <Quintasan|Szel> \o/
[19:55] <Quintasan|Szel> jussi01: congratulations then :)
[19:55] <jussi01> :D
[19:56]  * Quintasan|Szel hands cookies and vodka over to jussi01 
[19:56] <jussi01> *g*
[19:57] <Quintasan|Szel> take as much as you want, I will somehow make apachelogger pay for it :P
[20:02] <jussi01> lol
[20:05] <nixternal> jjesse: you get any emails about the kubuntu chapter in the book?
[21:26] <slacker_nl> congrats jussi01
[22:35] <Lure> ENORIDDELL, how unexpected... ;-)
[22:36] <Lure> ScottK: do you also have ubuntu-archive powers and can execute sync requests?
[22:36]  * Lure has 3 syncs for exiv2 library transition
[22:36] <ScottK> Lure: No.  One needs shell access for that and only archive-admins who work for Canonical get that.
[22:37] <Lure> oh, I recall that issue from times when Hobbsee joined archive team as first non-Canonical
[22:37] <Lure> would have thought that this 2nd class archive members is already resolved...
[22:38] <Lure> will have to wait for Riddell then
[22:38]  * Lure looks into hugin merge instead...
[22:53]  * Lure notices that we do not have koffice2 2.1 released in november...
[22:59] <Lure> anybody knows why we have koffice2 and debian koffice (in experimental) and we claim we are synced?
[23:01] <Lure> I think we should drop koffice 1.x in lucid...