[00:45] <SoftwareExplore1> I found a bug report that was filed by someone in Karmic. I can confirm it in Lucid. Should I add the lucid tag?
[00:45] <micahg> SoftwareExplore1: no, but there's something you can add to the description
[00:45] <micahg> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Description
[00:46] <micahg> SoftwareExplore1: actually it probably depends what package
[00:46] <SoftwareExplore1> micahg: gtk-recordmydesktop
[00:46] <micahg> SoftwareExplore1: nah, just add last version tested to the descrption
[00:47] <SoftwareExplore1> micahg: So what does the lucid tag mean?
[00:47] <micahg> SoftwareExplore1: some teams use it to track bugs across releases like the kernel team
[00:48] <SoftwareExplore1> micahg: Thanks :)
[00:49] <bdmurray> micahg: actually apport is release tagging bug reports now
[00:49] <bdmurray> so apport bug will now have a lucid tag
[00:49] <bdmurray> er any apport bug
[00:49] <micahg> bdmurray: ok, should people manually tag it though?
[00:50] <bdmurray> I don't see why not
[00:50] <micahg> k, SoftwareExplore1 ^^^
[00:50] <micahg> bdmurray: should the wiki tags page be updated then?
[00:51] <bdmurray> micahg: maybe not yet
[00:51] <micahg> bdmurray: so what should I tell people?  if they want to add it?
[00:52] <bdmurray> if they want to tag a bug as lucid because it also appears in lucid fine
[00:53] <bdmurray> I mean yes that would be good
[00:53] <micahg> k
[00:53] <micahg> bdmurray: would you be able to bump the maxversion on the gm-dev scripts to 3.6.*?
[00:54] <bdmurray> micahg: yes, I have an update (new script) I need to do anyways
[00:54] <micahg> bdmurray: thanks :)
[01:06] <nigel_nb> please set bug 503466 to triaged, wishlist
[01:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 503466 in nautilus "cannot use CTRL-C in the tree sidepane in nautilus" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503466
[01:34] <hggdh> nigel_nb: done
[01:34] <nigel_nb> thanks hggdh :)
[02:32] <hggdh> nigel_nb: I went ahead and added an upstream bug & marked it Triaged
[02:32] <hggdh> you could have looked for an upstream bug ;-)
[02:33] <nigel_nb> hggdh: oh
[02:33] <hggdh> :-)
[02:33] <nigel_nb> hggdh: I got caught up with meetings
[02:33] <nigel_nb> hggdh: the ubuntu-beginners team had meeting
[02:33] <hggdh> no problem, just pulling your leg on this
[02:39] <nigel_nb> hggdh: i'm still not back to active triaging lifestyle
[02:39] <nigel_nb> ;)
[02:39] <nigel_nb> just getting back into shape
[02:39] <hggdh> good, am missing your work ;-)
[02:40] <nigel_nb> my laptop is not cooperating
[02:40] <nigel_nb> something is seriously wrong with it, it refuses to boot
[02:40] <hggdh> ugh
[02:40] <hggdh> not good
[02:40] <nigel_nb> i have to keep turning it off and on for it to start
[02:49] <nigel_nb> hggdh: its amazing how its still in 1 piece
[02:49] <nigel_nb> i've been tempted to break into 2 a couple of times this week
[02:50] <hggdh> heh
[02:50] <hggdh> I know the feeling, been there before
[02:57] <nigel_nb> hehe
[03:05] <nigel_nb> hggdh: wanted to ask you something a while back
[03:06] <nigel_nb> hggdh: does the launchpad answers team have a policy of marking questions against the yelp package if they find no suitable package?
[03:14] <hggdh> nightwish: not to my knowledge
[03:14] <hggdh> brb
[03:16] <hggdh> nigel_nb: ^^^
[03:16] <nigel_nb> hmm
[03:16] <nigel_nb> someone seems to be doing it
[03:17] <hggdh> examples?
[03:19] <nigel_nb> getting
[03:19] <nigel_nb> I changed it back to no package
[03:19] <nigel_nb> and it got changed back to yelp
[03:20] <nigel_nb> https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yelp/+question/95907
[03:21] <micahg> nigel_nb: if you subscribe, you can see who's doing it
[03:21] <nigel_nb> I know who'se doing it
[03:22] <micahg> nigel_nb: did you ask the person why?
[03:22] <nigel_nb> I wanted to make sure it was not an official policy or something
[03:22] <nigel_nb> micahg: karma points? lol
[03:23] <micahg> nigel_nb: BTW, epiphany browser is epiphany-browser, epiphany is a game
[03:23]  * nigel_nb going to a corner and cries in humiliation
[03:23] <hggdh> heh
[03:23] <micahg> nigel_nb: that's an easy mistake I think everyone makes at least once
[03:24] <micahg> nigel_nb: http://pastebin.com/f383d245c
[03:25] <nigel_nb> micahg: ah, thanks, were did u get that list btw?
[03:25] <micahg> nigel_nb: dpkg -l | grep epiphany
[03:25] <micahg> that was what I had installed/removed
[03:25] <nigel_nb> ah
[03:26] <nigel_nb> hggdh: heard of sushi-huh?
[03:27] <hggdh> sushi I know, but not sushi-huh
[03:27] <hggdh> or dpkg -l epiphany\*
[03:27] <nigel_nb> hggdh: a badly documented source forge project
[03:28] <nigel_nb> but has good intentions
[03:28] <hggdh> looking it up now
[03:28] <micahg> hggdh: your way looks nicer :), but you have to remember the *
[03:29]  * micahg actually made a bash alias called dgrep for dpkg -l | grep
[03:30] <hggdh> micahg, actually, better to always escape the * -- \* -- otherwise the shell may expand it if there are matches in the cwd
[03:31] <nigel_nb> hggdh: for example "11) Why your english sucks?  Well, the english is not my natal language."
[03:31] <nigel_nb> its from the FAQ of the documentation
[03:31] <hggdh> heh
[03:31] <micahg> hggdh: the other advantage to your way is you can see if other packages match the string that you never installed
[03:31] <hggdh> they might need some help there...
[03:31] <nigel_nb> hggdh: thinking about it, it looks amazing
[03:32] <nigel_nb> does bug 503548 look like a support request?
[03:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 503548 in indicator-applet "'Switch user' option performs 'Lock screen' action" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503548
[03:32] <nigel_nb> I can see the other button on my system
[03:33] <micahg> nigel_nb: are you using Lucid?
[03:34] <nigel_nb> micahg: damn
[03:34] <nigel_nb> I'll check in lucid
[03:34] <hggdh> nigel_nb: it is a real issue on Lucid, just tested
[03:34] <nigel_nb> oh
[03:34] <nigel_nb> will mark as confirmed
[03:36] <nigel_nb> hggdh: isn't it indicator-applet-session rather than indicator-applet?
[03:36] <hggdh> yes indeed
[03:36] <nigel_nb> ah, one is a source of the other
[03:37] <nigel_nb> what do I do about bug 503540?
[03:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 503540 in linux "cpufreq reports wrong scaling_max_freq" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503540
[03:40] <nigel_nb> micahg: did u correct my epiphany mistake earlier?
[03:40] <micahg> nigel_nb: nope
[03:40] <nigel_nb> micahg: remember where was it?
[03:40] <micahg> nigel_nb: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/yelp/+question/95907
[03:41] <hggdh> nigel_nb: sounds like a valid bug
[03:43] <nigel_nb> hggdh: I can confirm it?
[03:43] <nigel_nb> hggdh: that sushi-huh tool is awesome, I have to blog about it
[03:43] <nigel_nb> lemme see if I can contribute to it
[03:50] <hggdh> nigel_nb: no, we cannot *really* confirm it -- we cannot reproduce
[03:51] <hggdh> but... this is one of those bugs where pretty much nobody will be able to confirm
[03:51] <hggdh> nigel_nb: ogasawara would be able to answer
[05:09] <LimCore> my entire box hard-frozen.  Which  apport-bug xxx should I start?
[05:11] <LimCore> other question: the Capslock LED does not light up in VTs (but the key works, and the LED works in X). How to report this one?
[05:26] <MoodFreak> .
[09:20] <joaopinto> hello
[09:20] <joaopinto> how do I set a bug as affecting a specific ubuntu release ?
[09:20] <persia> You'd nominate it for a release.
[09:20] <persia> Which bug?
[09:21] <joaopinto> bug 429835
[09:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 429835 in langpack-o-matic "[MASTER] chrome error when viewing untrusted https site using firefox with some locales" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/429835
[09:21] <joaopinto> it's reported as fixed, but I am experiencing on lucid
[09:22] <joaopinto> It was not present on karmic, I am not sure I should have used the same bug report
[09:22] <joaopinto> I did the bug change description accordingly to my experience :P
[09:22] <persia> You may be encountering another bug with the same symptoms.  Can you confirm that it's not related to bug #437545 ?
[09:23] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 437545 in langpack-o-matic "missing spanish translation in firefox 3.5 (in devmode)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/437545
[09:24] <joaopinto> persia, is not related, my browser is properly translated, however when attempting to browse a self signed ceriticate I get the broken XML page, like reported on bug 429835
[09:24] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 429835 in langpack-o-matic "[MASTER] chrome error when viewing untrusted https site using firefox with some locales" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/429835
[09:24] <persia> Right.  I suspect you're finding a different bug with similar symptoms (although I could be wrong).
[09:24] <persia> Just because the fix described in that bug solved it for some people.
[09:27] <joaopinto> persia, right, for some people means it has partially fixed, but is not fixed
[09:28] <persia> Right, but if that fix is correct, it's not a bug in firefox, so that's not the right place to get it fixed.
[09:29] <joaopinto> the bug is also set to affects "langpack-o-matic"
[09:31] <persia> Yes, which task was also previously closed, and the other bug I referenced opened.
[09:31] <joaopinto> the options I can see, is, 1) open  a new bug report, 2) nominate the bug for lucid
[09:31] <persia> Anyway, you can track that bug if you like, but there's at least some chance that you7re seeing something else, in which case tracking that won7t help get it fixed.
[09:32] <persia> It's *already* nominated for lucid: there were two tasks for firefox: lucid and karmic.
[09:32] <joaopinto> I just want to make sure it get's fixed, this is a serious bug
[09:32] <joaopinto> persia, are you looking at 429835 ?
[09:32]  * persia double-checks
[09:33] <persia> Yep.  That has lucid and karmic tasks for firefox, and a lucid task for langpack-o-matic.
[09:33] <joaopinto> I don't see any lucid specific task
[09:35] <persia> Right, tasks which are not specific apply to the current development release, which is currently lucid.
[09:36] <persia> Creating a "lucid" task makes the headline task go away.
[09:36] <persia> (this will change when the next cycle opens)
[09:36] <persia> This is a confusing UI quirk, but it doesn't really matter that much.
[09:37] <joaopinto> well, if the firefox related task importance was set to High, the langpack one should also
[09:37] <joaopinto> this bug report is a mess :)
[09:37] <persia> Indeed, which is why it may be more useful to follow-up on 437545
[09:38] <persia> Or create a new bug, using the information in 429835 and 437545 to identify the current specific issue.
[09:39] <joaopinto> I have nominated 429835 for lucid, let's see what happens
[09:39] <joaopinto> if required I will create a new bug report
[09:39] <joaopinto> I will need to use the LANG=C workaround :P
[15:03] <bddebian> Boo
[15:26] <thekorn> hey bddebian
[15:28] <bddebian> Hi thekorn
[17:02] <pmatulis> on 8.04 server how does one add debugging information to an existing bug (involving dovecot)?  apport-cli does not have the (K) keep feature
[17:08] <charlie-tca> This doesn't work? apport-collect -p <package_name> <BUG_NUMBER>
[17:08] <pmatulis> charlie-tca: apport-collect binary does not seem to be available with apport shipped with 8.04
[17:09] <charlie-tca> hmmm
[17:09] <pmatulis> just apport-unpack, apport-cli, and ubuntu-bug
[17:17] <micahg> pmatulis: it was added in jaunty
[17:18] <pmatulis> micahg: :(  so nothing for hardy
[17:18] <micahg> pmatulis: idk if apport-cli has such an option
[17:19] <pmatulis> micahg: i looked.  hardy version does not have the (K) keep option
[17:20] <micahg> pmatulis: no, definitely not, I don't think that was added till Lucid
[17:20] <micahg> but does it have the option for supplying a bug number?
[17:20] <pmatulis> micahg: no
[17:21] <micahg> pmatulis: you can ask for the files manually I guess...
[17:21] <pmatulis> micahg: yeah...
[17:21] <micahg> pmatulis: I'll mention it at our meeting
[17:22] <pmatulis> micahg: thanks
[17:57] <SoftwareExplorer> I'm trying to report a bug on gnome's bug tracker. What version of gnome does Lucid have?
[18:02] <charlie-tca> Latest upload:    1:2.28+1ubuntu1
[18:02] <charlie-tca> SoftwareExplorer: did you have a particular component in mind?
[18:03] <SoftwareExplorer> charlie-tca: gnome-screenshot
[18:05] <SoftwareExplorer> charlie-tca: Thanks. I'll file it as 2.28 version.
[18:07] <charlie-tca> Yeah, looks like the closest thing I can find
[19:52] <vish> hmm , anyone know french... ?
[19:54] <Pici> #ubuntu-fr perhaps?
[19:57] <vish> Pici: a bug had been reported in french...   but would they be able to translate it?
[19:59] <hggdh> vish, what is the bug #?
[19:59] <vish> yay, hggdh is here :)
[20:00] <vish> hggdh: Bug #503586 ,
[20:00] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 503586 in firefox-3.5 "Un script sur cette page est peut-être occupé ou ne répond plus. Vous pouvez arrêter le script maintenant ou attendre pour voir si le script se terminera." [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/503586
[20:00] <vish> the user has translated the bug , but i think it is not complete as it doesnt mention a bug
[20:00] <micahg> vish: google translate is nice :)
[20:00] <vish> hggdh: ^
[20:00] <hggdh> a script on this page may be busy or not responding. You can stop the script now or wait to see if the script ends
[20:00] <vish> doH!
[20:00]  * vish was slow :/
[20:00] <micahg> LP is slow :P
[20:01] <micahg> vish: convert to Q
[20:01] <micahg> and explain what it is
[20:01] <vish> oh is he asking how to stop the script?
[20:02] <micahg> vish: no, the user thinks that's a bug
[20:02] <micahg> it's a feature :)
[20:02] <vish> ah cool
[20:02] <micahg> it prevents a script from keeping the browser from responding
[20:02] <hggdh> heh
[20:02] <vish> heh, right , he was quoting from the dialogue..
[20:02] <micahg> if a script is running too long, FF will pause it and give the user the option to abort
[20:03] <vish> i just thought.. the translation was incomplete :)
[20:03] <vish> micahg: thanks :)
[20:03] <micahg> they can report it to the site in question if they think the script shouldn't run that long
[20:07] <hggdh> and -- vish -- the folks at #ubuntu-fr would be able to translate, most probably (although it is a francophone-only channel, they *do* help if asked nicely ;-))
[20:09] <vish> hggdh: i was being sly ;p     i was mainly hoping *you* would respond/help/translate if online... but good to know there is a backup :)
[20:11] <hggdh> vish, you are welcome :-)
[20:12] <vish> hggdh: ah oops , thanks :D
[21:00] <malev> hi! I been following this bug, and I think is confirmed. not by me but, by others... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/366478
[21:00] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 366478 in ubuntu "Alcor Micro Corp. Multimedia Card Reader don't work in Ubuntu 9.04/9.10 (058f:6362 Device offlined) " [Undecided,Confirmed]
[21:00] <malev> please check it out