[01:44] <juju2143> hey
[01:46] <juju2143> So I uploaded a package to my PPA, it got refused cause I didn't signed the code of conduct, then I signed it, now I do that dput command and it won't let me upload again
[01:47] <juju2143> what I do?
[01:47] <james_w> juju2143: use "dput -f" to override
[01:47] <juju2143> kthx.
[02:32] <maxb> Is there's a LOSA around: we have stuck builds again ^
[02:33] <spm> maxb: that's not something we can fix unf; I will find someone who can. one sec.
[02:37] <juju2143> stuck builds?
[02:40] <juju2143> whats is stuck builds?
[02:42] <juju2143> i'm currently building a package on Launchpad, still waiting since 45 minutes, is it stuck?
[02:44] <CarlFK> https://edge.launchpad.net/~carlfk - I have basically lost my private key.  (mkfs /home, found block with keys, but can't figure out how to recover them)
[02:44] <CarlFK> so what do I need to do to replace my keys on lp?
[02:55] <thumper> CarlFK: if you have lost your key you need to generate a new one
[02:55] <thumper> CarlFK: ssh or gpg?
[02:57] <thumper> CarlFK: https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+editpgpkeys and https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+editsshkeys
[03:15] <ub3rst4r> hi, i was wondering why website layout is off on the websites?
[03:16] <ub3rst4r> *project websites
[03:21] <thumper> ub3rst4r: got an example?
[03:22] <ub3rst4r> 1sec
[03:25] <ub3rst4r> http://tinypic.com/r/2n9lxk3/6
[03:26] <ub3rst4r> notice where report bugs is located
[03:27] <ub3rst4r> thumper u there?
[03:28] <thumper> yes
[03:28] <ub3rst4r> thumper should i report this?
[03:29] <thumper> I don't see anything on that link
[03:30] <thumper> damn js blocker
[03:30] <ub3rst4r> it happens on firefox and internet explorer 8
[03:31] <ub3rst4r> https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/417343
[03:31] <thumper> ub3rst4r: try edge
[03:32] <thumper> ub3rst4r: use bugs.edge.launchpad.net instead of bugs.launchpad.net
[03:32] <thumper> see if it still occurs
[03:32] <ub3rst4r> ya it looks like its fixed there
[03:33] <thumper> cool
[03:34] <ub3rst4r> i guess ill wait until someone changes it on launchpad.net
[03:34] <thumper> ub3rst4r: next rollout is end of the month
[03:34] <ub3rst4r> ok thanks
[03:40] <CarlFK> thumper: gpg  - read link.. thanks.  I figured it was like that.
[03:55] <EsatYuce> i edited one Launchpad page. is there any problem?
[04:00] <CarlFK> https://edge.launchpad.net/+help/openpgp-keys.html "       Step 2: Select File > New, select PGP Key and then follow the on-screen instructions.     "
[04:01] <CarlFK> "generateing key\n primegen" for over 10 min
[04:02] <CarlFK> ah, looks like surfing wasn't random enough, but whining on irc is
[04:06] <CarlFK> carl@gw42:~$ gpg --send-keys --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com 63D0E04D
[04:06] <CarlFK> gpg: sending key 63D0E04D to hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com; gpg: keyserver timed out
[04:06] <CarlFK> grumble...
[04:10] <CarlFK> timed out again.  is there another server I can use?
[04:15] <spm> CarlFK: give it a whirl now?
[04:21] <CarlFK> spm: worked
[04:21] <spm> excellent
[04:21] <CarlFK> thanks
[04:22] <CarlFK> not sure what can be done, but the docs/feedback is kinda wonky:
[04:22] <CarlFK> https://edge.launchpad.net/+help/openpgp-keys.html says:
[04:22] <CarlFK> If successful, GPG will display a message similar to:      gpg: sending key 12345678 to hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
[04:22] <CarlFK> but that is the message you get when there is a problem too
[04:23] <spm> fair point
[04:23] <CarlFK> "If successful, GPG wont display an error message." (best i got)
[04:23] <CarlFK> anyway, I am off to the next setp
[04:24] <CarlFK> well, will give it 10 min for the data to flow though the pipes
[04:24] <wgrant> spm: At least some of those builds aren't really stuck.
[04:25] <wgrant> They're bug #499095
[04:25] <spm> ahhh. that one. again. brain is still in holiday mode. ta.
[04:26] <wgrant> 'tis fixed now, but the data still needs to be unbroken.
[04:30] <spm> CarlFK: fyi. https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/504126
[04:33] <spm> wgrant: ta for that; yeah two stucked; should sort themselves out nowish.
[04:34] <wgrant> spm: Although I guess that probably hasn't been C[PB]'d yet, has it?
[04:35] <spm> CP. not so far as I can tell
[04:36] <spm> CP == Cherry Pick, jic/fwiw
[04:36] <wgrant> I know. But this sort of stuff occasionally gets cowboyed too.
[04:37] <spm> heh. yes it does; and probably shouldn't... :-)
[04:51]  * thumper EODs
[06:33] <CarlFK> debuild -S -sa ... gpg: skipped "Carl Karsten <carl@personnelware.com>": secret key not available; gpg: /tmp/debsign.EaAw5K2u/dvswitch_0.9~alpha-0ubuntu2.dsc: clearsign failed: secret key not available
[06:34] <CarlFK> what did I miss?
[06:35] <CarlFK> oh wow, its midnight+... I'll futz with this after some sleep
[06:35] <spiv> CarlFK: have you updated the default-key in ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf ?
[06:41] <CarlFK> no, just did with default-key 63D0E04D, but still getting same error
[06:48] <wgrant> CarlFK: Make sure that your key has a UID that is precisely "Carl Karsten <carl@personnelware.com>" (including any comment)
[06:49] <CarlFK> uid                  Carl Karsten (let it flow) <carl@personnelware.com>
[06:50] <persia> Yeah, you need the (let it flow) bit.
[06:50] <CarlFK> where?
[06:50] <persia> In your changelog.
[06:50] <CarlFK> ah
[06:52] <CarlFK> if I use "debchange --increment" how do I tell it to use that comment?
[06:53] <ScottK> CarlFK: export DEBFULLNAME="Carl Karsten (let it flow)"
[06:54] <CarlFK> thanks
[06:57] <CarlFK> Successfully signed dsc and changes files - thanks *2
[06:58] <CarlFK> Successfully uploaded packages. - yay.  now I can really got to sleep
[08:28] <noodles775> I'm not seeing any style on branch pages: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~al-maisan/launchpad/spec-job-class-503839
[08:28] <noodles775> (on edge)
[08:28] <spiv> For me either.
[08:28] <spiv> (I just mentioned this on #launchpad-dev a few seconds ago as it happens)
[08:28] <spiv> I think this is new in the last 5 minutes.
[08:28] <spiv> Or thereabouts.
[08:28] <noodles775> yeah, edge rollout.
[08:30] <noodles775> losa ping... something with the edge rollout seems to have killed style/JS on all edge pages?
[08:30] <noodles775> (all that I've checked so fare anyway... - or is it an intermittent thing during the edge rollout?)
[08:31] <noodles775> See spiv's comment on lp-dev - more accurate description of the problem :)
[08:31] <mthaddon> noodles775: see https://pastebin.canonical.com/26298/
[08:31] <mthaddon> noodles775: which comment is that?
 Hmm, I'm getting 404 for https://edge.launchpad.net/+icing/rev10123/combo.css
[08:33] <mthaddon> noodles775: make static seems to be failing with https://pastebin.canonical.com/26299/
[08:34] <mthaddon> why's it looking for pydoc2.4?
[08:34] <noodles775> Not sure, but that also seems related to the 26298 paste above - it's saying that the python 'with' statement is as syntax error (introduced in 2.5)
[08:35] <mthaddon> noodles775: the second paste is taken from the first paste
[10:51] <krj_> Is it possible to search for bugs that also affects me in launchpad? (Something like https://bugs.launchpad.net/~FOO/+affectsme?)
[11:16] <james_w> I found one of the bugs that makes the API a right pain: 504199
[13:32] <M4g3> hi all
[13:33] <M4g3> is this the right place to talk bout xibo
[13:33] <tsimpson> what is xibo?
[13:34] <M4g3> signage system
[13:34] <M4g3> xibo.org.uk
[13:34] <tsimpson> this channel is about launchpad
[13:34] <M4g3> oh i see
[13:35] <M4g3> bah sorry is my bad
[13:35] <M4g3> read a bug report and thought it was for xibo
[13:35] <M4g3> thx :)
[13:35] <tsimpson> no problem
[13:35] <M4g3> laterz
[15:10] <CarlFK> PPA reject: dvswitch_0.9~alpha-0ubuntu2.dsc: Version older than that in the archive. 0.9~alpha-0ubuntu2 <= 0.9~alpha-0.4
[15:11] <CarlFK> where does it find "alpha" ?
[15:12] <CarlFK> oh, that's mine...
[15:13] <noodles775> :)
[15:16] <ScottK> jelmer: If you have a moment, I think I found another bzr svn-import bug.
[15:23] <thopiekar> hi
[15:23] <thopiekar> how can it be that this build can't find packages e.g. debhelper? https://launchpad.net/~thopiekar/+archive/poulsbo/+build/1434224
[15:25] <thopiekar> and why does that take that much time.. ( https://launchpad.net/~thopiekar/+archive/poulsbo/+build/1434225 )? before 25minutes it said that it will build it in 14minutes.. and building all these packages, uploaded here yesterday ( https://launchpad.net/~thopiekar/+archive/poulsbo/+packages ), took 24h!
[15:26] <thopiekar> I want my poulsbo drivers ;(
[15:53] <jelmer> ScottK: Sure
[15:53] <jelmer> ScottK: Are you still there?
[15:54] <ScottK> jelmer: Yes.
[15:54] <ScottK> give me a moment to pastebin some stuff
[15:54] <jelmer> k
[15:55] <ScottK> jelmer: Have a look at http://paste.debian.net/55922/
[15:56] <ScottK> I have a second project at the same site as yesterday's that I'm migrating too.
[15:56] <ScottK> So I followed the pattern you showed me.
[15:56] <ScottK> As you can see, after the svn-import it knew about tags up to 2.006.
[15:56] <ScottK> 2.007 is the current release.
[15:57] <ScottK> At some level that tag must be accessible, becuase when I branched based on it, it worked.
[15:57] <ScottK> So something seems odd here.
[16:01]  * jelmer looks
[16:04] <jelmer> ScottK: Can you file a bug?
[16:04] <jelmer> It looks like the problem is that the tag was added after the latest revision of trunk
[16:05] <jelmer> and since the tag is not actually of a revision on trunk it wasn't picked up by svn-import
[16:06] <ScottK> jelmer: That fits, since the last thing I did was branch and tag the release.
[16:06] <ScottK> jelmer: Where do I file the bug?
[16:07] <jelmer> ScottK: https://launchpad.net/bzr-svn :-)
[16:07] <ScottK> Thanks.
[16:08] <xnox> ScottK: as far as I know the "tag" commit did not touch anything in the trunk/ directory
[16:08] <xnox> hence the tag is not found =(
[16:08] <james_w> edge seems to be struggling today, is anyone looking in to why?
[16:08] <ScottK> Right, but since all that is imported directly is the trunk it's a bit of a gap.
[16:09] <jelmer> xnox, if the tag is there in svn it will show up in "bzr tags"
[16:09] <jelmer> xnox, it might just be showing "?" for the revision if that revision is not in the history of trunk
[16:09] <xnox> jelmer: hmmmm interesting
[16:10] <jelmer> ScottK: Looks like this is a svn-import specific bug, bzr branch copies the 2.007 tag without problems
[16:10] <xnox> jelmer: yeap you are right. never mind then
[16:10] <ScottK> jelmer: OK.  Working on the bug now.
[16:11] <stain> hi!
[16:11] <stain> Is it possible to find/look at referer logs for downloads of our project?
[16:14] <ScottK> jelmer: Bug #504314
[16:16] <jelmer> ScottK: Great, thanks.
[16:18] <jelmer> ScottK, another workaround is to just run "bzr pull" in trunk
[16:19] <ScottK> Interesting.
[17:05] <Zorael> I'm trying to upload to launchpad from this machine running Kubuntu 9.10 using dput, but the upload consistently stops at the last kilobyte and just sits there idle. Is this common?
[17:06] <maxb> Others have reported this, but I don't think a satisfactory answer has been deduced
[17:06] <Zorael> All right, thanks.
[17:09] <jpds> Zorael: bug #193848
[17:10] <ScottK> Oddly I never have that problem uploading to Debian.
[17:11] <ScottK> I upload to Debian a lot less, so it may just be statistics.
[17:13] <Zorael> Weird thing is it worked yesterday on the same machine.
[17:13] <maxb> It's probably something weird in the custom ftpd that launchpad uses
[17:37] <JimNatron> #help
[17:38] <JimNatron> I thought I'd try to post a bug and I need some pointers. Annyone got some time?
[17:54] <thopiekar> hi
[17:55] <thopiekar> could you please tell me what fails here?
[17:55] <thopiekar> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37546054/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-i386.xserver-xorg-video-psb_0.36.0-0ubuntu1~910um2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[17:59] <rdb> Is it possible to sign a source archive by someone else than the package maintainer, or is that not allowed?
[18:01] <thopiekar> hmm it doesn't seem that somebody can help me :/
[18:12] <maxb> thopiekar: Be patient :-)
[18:12] <maxb>   libdrm-poulsbo-dev: Depends: libdrm-poulsbo1 (= 2.3.3-0ubuntu3netbook8) but it is not going to be installed
[18:12] <thopiekar> I just tried it some hours before but nobody replied..
[18:13] <maxb> Please give the url to the PPA in question
[18:13] <thopiekar> thanks maxb for responsing but I taked with some other people at #ubuntu.de
[18:13] <maxb> rdb: Signing simply authenticates the act of uploading. So, yes.
[18:14] <thopiekar> and I think that there is a dependency of a listed package that collides with libdrm-poulsbo-dev
[18:14] <rdb> maxb, ah, ok. thanks
[18:16] <JimNatron> somtime x won't start when I boot. I was wondering if anyone knew of any logfil(s) that would help debugging the problem
[18:17] <JimNatron> sorry I meant sometimes...
[18:34] <james_w> jpds, maxb: that person is a known troll, best to leave them as they are. (From other channel)
[18:36] <maxb> He used to be vaguely sensible when I encountered him in a svn context years ago, but he really seems to have it in for bzr :-/
[18:37] <maxb> Although given how bzr is behaving trying to branch that repo for me, I feel his anguish
[19:15] <thopiekar> puuh! at least it seems that the builders are working well.. I pushed a file online some minutes before and they are building it directly!
[19:16] <thopiekar> waiting for a build hours long really goes on my nervs ;)
[20:58] <JamieBennett> bzr confusion, just pushed a change, looked at my branch on launchpad and its completely different
[20:59] <JamieBennett> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~jamiebennett/ubuntu-seeds/unr-lucid+netbook-launcher-efl is the branch
[20:59] <JamieBennett> This is what you get when you click the revision number link
[20:59] <JamieBennett> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jamiebennett/ubuntu-seeds/unr-lucid+netbook-launcher-efl/revision/58
[20:59] <JamieBennett> bug?
[21:00] <thumper> JamieBennett: what do you mean it is completely different?
[21:01] <JamieBennett> the change and files are from another commit I presume
[21:02] <JamieBennett> I changed a unr seed
[21:02] <mwhudson> is this the last-revision file being screwy again
[21:02] <mwhudson> yes
[21:03] <mwhudson> JamieBennett: what exactly did you do to the branch?
[21:03] <mwhudson> this is a bzr bug
[21:03] <mwhudson> that i thought was fixed, tbh
[21:03] <mwhudson> JamieBennett: also what version of bzr?
[21:03] <JamieBennett> Added added one packages
[21:04] <JamieBennett> Bazaar (bzr) 2.0.0
[21:04] <thumper> mwhudson: loggerhead says more revisions are there
[21:04] <mwhudson> thumper: loggerhead is right
[21:04] <mwhudson> thumper: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jamiebennett/ubuntu-seeds/unr-lucid%2Bnetbook-launcher-efl/.bzr/branch/last-revision
[21:04] <mwhudson> thumper: this file is wrong
[21:05] <JamieBennett> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jamiebennett/ubuntu-seeds/unr-lucid%2Bnetbook-launcher-efl/revision/1421 - was my change
[21:07] <mwhudson> looks pretty simple
[21:07] <mwhudson> JamieBennett: can you pastebin your .bzr.log file?  maybe to the private pastebin
[22:28] <sbeattie> Hi, I've subscribed to a code branch; however, neither myself or the other subscriber to that branch have gotten emails for bzr commits to that branch. Is something up?
[22:28] <sbeattie> For reference, the specific branch is https://code.launchpad.net/~apparmor-dev/apparmor/master
[22:40] <jelmer> sbeattie: Hi
[22:40] <jelmer> sbeattie: Are you subscribed to revision changes in that branch, not to just changes to the branch metadata?
[22:43] <sbeattie> jelmer: doh, I told it to send me notes about all reviews, but just the branch metadata. Thanks.
[23:52] <nhandler> When you upload to a PPA, LP is meant to email you regardless of whether or not the package is accepted, correct?
[23:52] <bigjools> correct
[23:52] <bigjools> unless it's unable to determine who uploaded it
[23:52] <nhandler> I've been trying to upload a package for the past day or so. dput says it succeeds in uploading to the PPA, but I get no email
[23:53] <bigjools> https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/soyuz/+faq/227
[23:53] <bigjools> perhaps?
[23:54] <jelmer> 'evening bigjools
[23:55] <nhandler> bigjools: If the package is signed with my key (which is linked to my LP account), will I receive an email (even if I am not the person listed in the changelog) ?
[23:55] <nhandler> Cool, I actually got an email this time :) I wonder what happened to the dozen other uploads ;)
[23:57] <james_w> nhandler: you didn't ask anyone about it in a public channel ;-)