[00:23] <nhandler> james_w: This is a public channel
[00:24] <persia> nhandler: Which is why it suddenly worked : the universe conspiring to maximise your facial egg quotient
[00:24] <nhandler> The one email I got was to complain that I entered an invalid PPA for one of the uploads (I had an extra ~ at the beginning). I stil haven't gotten any emails for any of the earlier or later uploads (with a correct PPA)
[00:29] <Kamping_Kaiser> how long should a redirect take? https://help.launchpad.net/BugTrackerEmailInterface?action=show&redirect=UsingMaloneEmail hasn't redirecgted after ~30 seconds
[00:31] <wgrant> Kamping_Kaiser: It won't redirect because of those extra args. The problem is that there are two layers of redirection.
[00:32] <Kamping_Kaiser> wgrant: ah. I'll update the wiki page the original link was from then.
[00:32] <Kamping_Kaiser> wgrant: thanks for that.
[01:19] <james_w> I'm getting a lot of connection timeouts talking to LP currently
[01:19] <james_w> anyone else seeing this?
[01:21] <james_w> actually, seems like it may be a DC problem
[01:21] <spm> james_w: edge? prod? any specific pages, or all?
[01:21] <james_w> seems like I can't get to anything from jubany currently
[01:22] <spm> impressive
[02:57] <CarlFK> CMake Error at cmake/FindLiveMedia.cmake:36 (message):   liveMedia headers not found
[02:58] <CarlFK> why I am getting that?
[02:58] <CarlFK> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37546050/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-amd64.dvswitch_0.9~trunk0_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[02:58] <persia> CarlFK: Try a local build, and see if you can replicate.  That's your best means of tracking it down.
[03:00] <CarlFK> thought i did, but maybe not on this box
[03:04] <CarlFK> make makes.  dpkg-buildpackage -uc -b builds.
[03:08] <persia> CarlFK: Try pbuilder or sbuild: there may be something in the environment that is different.
[03:39] <CarlFK> doesn't Build-Depends: need FindLiveMedia-dev or something?
[04:17] <spm> ** FYI. About to commence doing rolling restarts on the LP prod web servers (not edge) for a Cherry Pick. **
[04:30] <jml> spm, dented.
[04:30] <spm> ta
[04:30] <jml> spm, can you please let me know when it's done?
[04:30] <spm> certainly
[04:30] <spm> 4 of 5 app servers done; the FE's and 1 app left to do
[04:36] <spm> jml: that should be it; just verifying revnos and general workingness
[04:36] <jml> spm, thanks. I'll wait until you've verified
[04:37] <spm> jml: all looks cool and froody
[04:39] <spm> woo. and it works too. https://launchpad.net/~maurizioantillon (as not me shows the gone page)
[06:11] <Flare183> Can someone fix this for me? Unable to obtain lock lp-64855248:///~richardson183/ubuntu-bots/flarebot/.bzr/branch/lock
[06:13] <cody-somerville> Flare183, try this: bzr break-lock lp:~richardson183/ubuntu-bots/flarebot/
[08:20] <slytherin> How do I add a release task for a bug in LP?
[08:21] <wgrant> slytherin: "Nominate for release"
[08:21] <wgrant> Just under the table.
[08:21] <wgrant> It could also be "Target to release", depending on your privileges.
[08:21] <slytherin> right, I don't have privileges for 'Target to release'
[08:22] <wgrant> If you can upload to a package, nominating will actually target, despite what the link says.
[08:22] <wgrant> Otherwise, you'll need to nominate and then find somebody with privileges to approve it.
[08:23] <slytherin> Understood.
[08:29] <jussi01> is there a way, when adding people to teams using the api, that you can set an expiry date?
[08:30] <wgrant> jussi01: It doesn't look like it.
[08:30] <jussi01> :(
[08:30]  * jussi01 thinks maybe its file a bug time
[08:45] <thekorn> jussi01, it should be possible, but not in one function call
[08:46] <jussi01> thekorn: ok, I havent seen documentation, can you point me?
[08:46] <thekorn> I'm sure there is team.addMember and membership.setexpirationdate(9 or something
[08:46] <thekorn> jussi01, let me double check first ;)
[08:48] <thekorn> jussi01, http://paste.ubuntu.com/353367/
[08:48] <jussi01> thekorn: ok, thanks a million! :)
[08:49] <thekorn> (note: the filter() part looks so ugly because of a bug in launchpadlib :))
[09:22] <frangor> hi
[10:43] <slytherin> Is there a DTD or XSD for the bug import format specified at https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/ImportFormat ?
[11:01] <AlanBell> hello all
[11:02] <AlanBell> could someone help me understand what is up with https://launchpad.net/~vorian
[11:02] <AlanBell> it appears to be the profile of "Steve Stalcup"
[11:02] <persia> AlanBell: It's a very special case.  Best bet would be to speak to that individual.
[11:02] <AlanBell> who is listed in kubuntu members
[11:03] <AlanBell> I have a python-launchpadlib script itterating over the members and it barfs at that point
[11:03] <jussi01> AlanBell: There?s no page with this address in Launchpad.
[11:03] <jussi01> thats what my browser says...
[11:03] <AlanBell> persia: if it is a special case I probably don't need to know the details
[11:04] <AlanBell> my real question is now to not barf
[11:04] <persia> AlanBell: That's the usual answer :)
[11:04] <AlanBell> jussi01: look in the list of kubuntu members for the grey icon
[11:04] <wgrant> AlanBell: For now just catch the 410.
[11:05] <wgrant> There needs to be a better solution, but that will have to do for now.
[11:05] <AlanBell> wgrant: ok, thanks, will do
[11:05] <spiv> Yes, it's a 410 Gone, not 404 Not Found.
[11:05] <spiv> i.e. there used to be a user there.
[11:05] <jussi01> I think it might be worth a word to a KC member about, I can do so ;)
[11:05] <wgrant> It's hitting my scripts too. I need to fix them.
[11:05]  * AlanBell remembers something and makes 2+2=4
[11:06]  * AlanBell will catch the 410
[11:16] <wgrant> I just got redirected to offline.html.
[11:16] <wgrant> Any idea why?
[11:23] <james_w> wgrant: API?
[11:24] <wgrant> james_w: Yeah.
[11:24] <james_w> I just got it too
[11:24] <wgrant> It hasn't happened again, yet.
[11:24] <james_w> I was getting it a lot yesterday as well
[11:28] <slytherin> I have few questions about https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/ImportFormat Why is an id attribute needed for every bug tag? Isn't id auto generated?
[11:30] <wgrant> slytherin: I believe that's the bug number from the old tracker.
[11:30] <slytherin> wgrant: What is it used for?
[11:30] <slytherin> I mean when importing into LP
[11:32] <wgrant> slytherin: Optionally to create aliases, and also to avoid importing the same bug twice.
[11:32] <slytherin> ok. I will add this information to my data then.
[11:33] <slytherin> I am actually writing a XSL script for converting SF exported data to the format needed by LP.
[11:34] <wgrant> There might be an existing script to do that.
[11:35] <slytherin> wgrant: I just want to import open bugs and not complete list.
[11:35] <wgrant> slytherin: Why?
[11:35] <wgrant> Normal practise is to import the complete history.
[11:35] <wgrant> That's much more useful.
[11:36] <slytherin> wgrant: There is no real benefit to our project of importing complete list.
[11:37] <wgrant> slytherin: You never need to refer to old bugs?
[11:37] <slytherin> No. :-D
[11:38] <slytherin> Except the existing references in ChangeLog and NEWS file.
[14:14] <akv> Is it possible to remove a group from being notified with updates to a bug we haven't added our group in? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exiv2/+bug/502565 - the Rawstudio group. None of us really care about the bug...
[14:18] <geser> akv: bug #204980
[14:22] <kenvandine> is there a way to rename a project?
[14:24] <thopiekar> hi
[14:24] <thopiekar> is there a way to rebuild ppa at all?
[14:25] <geser> can you be more verbose what you want to do?
[14:30] <thopiekar> geser: I want to rebuild every package in my ppa:thopiekar/poulsbo, because I updated libdrm-poulsbo which is a dependency of the most of the packages in that ppa.. so I want to rebuild the packages to update the other packages, too
[14:31] <persia> thopiekar: You need to upload new revisions to force a rebuild: there is a requirement that there be only one binary result from each source upload.
[14:31] <geser> as you need to bump the package revision for this, you need to re-upload
[14:32] <thopiekar> hmm ok, thank you, persia, geser
[14:32] <thopiekar> I at least found the probem why my package xserver-xorg-video-poulsbo doesn't wanted to build the packages :P
[14:33] <thopiekar> hopefully the poulsbo-drivers I will work on my netbook with gma500
[14:35] <akv> geser: exactly...but it doesn't look like there is a chance of this being fixed :(
[14:42] <thopiekar> what means a green gear?
[14:42] <maxb> built successfully, pending publication to the download area
[14:42] <maxb> ~ 5 minutes
[14:43] <thopiekar> so it's going to be published in my repo?
[14:43] <maxb> yes
[14:46] <thopiekar> could you please tell me what happend here ? why has the installation of the package faild o.O'?
[14:47] <cgregan> Is there some system maintenance going on now that was not announced? We are seeing 401 error when attempting to apt-get from our PPAs
[14:47] <cgregan> and the system seems very slow
[14:48] <thopiekar> yes since the middle of that week... but it's now working better for me
[14:48] <thopiekar> :)
[14:49] <cgregan> Hmm...not for me......(Error ID:         OOPS-1469M2009)
[16:46] <stain> anyone who knows stuff about download stats?
[16:46] <stain> beyond 'Total downloads: 1231'
[16:47] <beuno> stain, what do you mean?
[16:50] <stain> beuno: the reason I wonder is that our release https://launchpad.net/taverna/+milestone/2.1-rc-1 has a strange high number of DLs on only the windows version
[16:50] <stain> https://launchpad.net/taverna/+milestone/2.1-beta-2 shows more typical distribution
[16:51] <stain> so any graphs would help.. referer-logs could explain a lot.. well.. I'm just very curious if someone is still linking to our release candidate
[16:51] <beuno> stain, I don't think we can expose the access logs
[16:51] <beuno> is your application packaged in Ubuntu?
[16:52] <stain> no.. but they would not download the windows installer :)
[16:52] <stain> I guess 'not yet' is the right answer
[16:52] <beuno> right, but one theory could be that it got packaged, or a ppa became available, so linux people moved more towards that
[16:52] <stain> but it would be a lot easier now that Debian guys have made a Maven repository thingie (we bundle in ~120 JARs..)
[16:52] <beuno> salgado, is there any way to do some analysis?  &
[16:53] <beuno> ^
[16:53] <beuno> wow, that is a big difference
[16:54] <stain> yeah, because you see the same ppattern as from beta 2 on our latest release 2.1.0 (just smaller numbers as it just came out)
[16:54] <stain> so I'm suspecting someone had a tutorial somewhere with a specific link.. and then you should see a peak of downloads after a specific date
[16:54] <beuno> right
[16:55] <beuno> I don't know how that data is stored
[16:55] <beuno> stain, would you like to file a bug requesting daily stats?
[16:55] <stain> is it possible to get those numbers in a non-HTML way.. so I could make my own graphing with RRD or similar..?
[16:55] <stain> ok, can do :)
[16:55] <salgado> beuno, not without parsing the logs all over again
[16:55] <beuno> salgado, that doesn't sound like fun
[16:55] <beuno> so it just adds 'em up?
[16:56] <salgado> we have daily counts, though, which could be exposed
[16:56] <beuno> I wonder if we could save them on a per-day basis
[16:56] <beuno> ah!
[16:56] <beuno> exactly
[16:56] <beuno> that would be super nice
[16:56] <stain> per day would have been brilliant
[16:56] <beuno> stain, file the bug, I'll comment on the UI for it, and then we'll have to wait and see who can get the feature done
[16:57] <beuno> unless you're good with python and would like to give it a try  ;)
[16:57] <stain> I was once..
[16:57] <salgado> beuno, we could start by just exposing that on the API
[16:57] <stain> map(sum, [x.count() for x in f.downloads()]) or something? :)
[16:57] <stain> how much can I get in the API for this..?
[16:57] <stain> I found mainly metadata last time
[16:58] <beuno> salgado, is that something quick?  because that would rock
[16:58] <beuno> stain, we need to expose the information through the API
[16:58] <beuno> then you could harvest it and graph it
[16:58] <stain> yeah.. with colours and everything.. so I'll file two bug reports then? One about API access and one for HTML access?
[16:59] <beuno> yes   :)
[16:59] <beuno> the API one seems much more likely to happen quickly
[17:00] <salgado> beuno, just a matter of writing a new method on LibraryFileAlias (getDownloadsPerDay, maybe) and exposing it on the API
[17:01] <beuno> salgado, does that sound like something you could squeeze in?  or help stain with it if he's willing to take on the work?
[17:03] <stain> I can have a look at it on monday
[17:03] <stain> all courtesy of the British tax payer..
[17:03] <stain> is the launchpad.net sourcecode checkoutable?
[17:04] <salgado> beuno, sure
[17:04] <beuno> stain, sure, let me find you the wiki page to get it set up
[17:04] <beuno> then you could harvest it and graph it
[17:04] <beuno> er
[17:04] <beuno> copy and paste fail
[17:04] <beuno> stain, https://dev.launchpad.net/Getting
[17:05] <beuno> and: https://dev.launchpad.net/Running
[17:05] <beuno> stain, salgado implemented the feature, so he's your best contact point for this  :)
[17:05] <stain> cheers
[17:09] <idnar> is it possible to break a bug watch link?
[17:11] <micahg> idnar: break?
[17:12] <idnar> like, remove the link
[17:12] <idnar> I can apparently change the URL for the link, but not remove it
[17:13] <micahg> idnar: not that I know of, you can change the upstream task to no have a bugwatch anymore, but it'll still remember the link
[17:14] <idnar> hmm, guess I need a LOSA then (or whatever); I'm trying to get rid of https://edge.launchpad.net/bugs/bugtrackers/dosage-bugs because we migrated our bug tracking to Launchpad
[17:15] <micahg> ah
[17:15] <micahg> probably should file a request in answers.launchpad.net/launchpad
[17:15] <idnar> will do
[17:40] <scaloppina> Hi, I've a problem with my account in launchpad
[17:41] <scaloppina> I deregistered from launchpad and after 5 minutes I register newly with the same email account
[17:42] <scaloppina> now my OpenID is <my username of email addressl>-deactivated-account
[20:13] <Daviey> Trying to login to launchpad for openid purposes i recieved OOPS-1469J2198
[20:14] <Daviey> (worked second time)
[20:40] <zuwig> Hi!
[20:44] <fta> something wrong with the (ppa) builders? queues are growing but lots of builders are idle
[20:46] <ScottK> Not sure it's just PPA.
[20:47] <zuwig> Uploaded some translations for my project, that i received via mail, how do i approve them? The ehm "button" is gray.
[20:47] <beuno> zuwig, what URL is that?
[20:47] <beuno> LOSAs, are the builders ok?
[20:47] <ScottK> They aren't.
[20:47] <zuwig> can you view that? https://translations.launchpad.net/pdirl/1.0/+imports
[20:48] <zuwig> I can't change the "needs revie" status
[20:48] <zuwig> review*
[20:49] <zuwig> or.. wait... must be the name "default-xx.po" instead of "de.po" if the pot is "default.pot"?
[20:49] <ScottK> fta: Something just got reset in soyuz, so I'd check again in a few minutes.
[20:50] <fta> ScottK, ok, thanks
[20:51] <ScottK> Several archive buildds that were hung just went idle.
[20:51] <geser> all buildds are now occupied again
[20:51] <geser> so whatever button was pressed, it worked
[20:52] <beuno> [end nap]
[20:56] <zuwig> So back to my question, how do i approve translations?
[20:58] <beuno> danilos, around?
[20:58] <beuno> I don't know how that knob of translations works
[21:08] <mtaylor> hey all - I think we have a bzr mirroring issue?
[21:08] <mtaylor> bzr: ERROR: CHKInventoryRepository('http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~drizzle-developers/drizzle/development/.bzr/repository/')
[21:08] <mtaylor> is not compatible with
[21:08] <mtaylor> KnitPackRepository('http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~elambert/drizzle/gearman_replication_applier/.bzr/repository/')
[21:08] <mtaylor> elambert:drizzle elambert$ bzr upgrade --2a lp:~elambert/drizzle/gearman_replication_applier
[21:08] <mtaylor> bzr: ERROR: The branch format Meta directory format 1 is already at the most recent format.
[21:15] <zuwig> Logged in with xchat instead of Chatzilla
[21:36] <petur_> Launchpad down?
[21:36] <issyl0> Hi there, I can't get onto launchpad, it's not loading (I've reloaded three times).
[21:36] <issyl0> petur_: it appears so
[21:36] <petur_> Loads _very_ slow
[21:38] <issyl0> Ah now it has finally loaded.
[21:38] <petur_> confirmed
[21:57] <jtee> is there a way to see if a fix that has been committed to launchpad has been built yet?
[21:57] <jtee> or rather committed to karmic-proposed
[22:00] <wgrant> jtee: Has an automated comment from Launchpad Janitor saying something like "This bug was fixed in somepackage 1.2-3.4" been posted to the bug yet?
[22:05] <jtee> wgrant, no... the status has changed from  Confirmed → Fix Released
[22:05] <jtee> Accepted linux into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
[22:05] <jtee> that is what the last comment was
[22:06] <maxb> If you have the package name and version number you could look that up on launchpad and see the build status
[22:06] <maxb> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/name/version
[22:07] <jtee> maxb, its in linux (it's a kernel module)
[22:07] <maxb> tell us the bug number
[22:08] <jtee> 435352
[22:08] <maxb> bug 435352
[22:09] <jtee> hmmmm ... it appears in the change log!
[22:10] <jtee>  * USB: work around for EHCI with quirky periodic schedules
[22:10] <jtee>     - LP: #435352, #494633
[22:10] <maxb> jtee: So if you go to launchpad.net/ubuntu/karmic/+source/linux
[22:10] <maxb> and then click on the version under proposed, you can see its build states
[22:10] <jtee> maxb, I'm there and looking at the change log
[22:11] <maxb> As you can see, most of them say "Successfully built  (NEW)"
[22:11] <jtee> maxb, nice!  I see 'successfully built'
[22:11] <jtee> for what I need
[22:11] <maxb> NEW means it's built but not published for download yet
[22:12] <wgrant> Right, it has new binary packages, so it's awaiting approval by the archive admins.
[22:12] <jtee> so... I need to wait for it to be 'DONE'?
[22:13] <wgrant> Right.
[22:13] <jtee> phoeey
[22:13] <wgrant> You can go and get the binaries now, if you wish.
[22:13] <wgrant> Click on the build that you want.
[22:13] <wgrant> And grab the binaries from that page.
[22:14] <jtee> i see...
[22:18] <jtee> or i could wait a bit and have a fine new belgium brew and wait for it to go 'DONE'
[22:19] <wgrant> jtee: That might not happen over the weekend.
[22:19] <wgrant> It needs manual approval.
[22:19] <jtee> that would be quite a few ales
[22:20] <wgrant> It would.
[23:04] <psycose> I first did a "Also affects distribution" with an empty URL, now i would like to fill the URL so that LP can sync ... is it possible ?