| === fta2_ is now known as fta | ||
| === fta is now known as fta_ | ||
| Guest19873 | does anyone know what "Disabled for Enablement" means? (on one of the builder pages) | 02:33 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | Guest19873: Most of the PPA build machines are just on loan from their normal jobs. | 02:38 |
| wgrant | Guest19873: That means they've been returned to their assigned task, for now. | 02:38 |
| Guest19873 | and they drop the build they're working on to do so, huh | 02:39 |
| wgrant | Guest19873: Yes. They can be taken away at any time. It retried it automatically, didn't it? | 02:44 |
| Guest19873 | yea, another node took over, but the original one was in the middle of a 2+ hour build | 02:49 |
| Guest19873 | which is strange, too, because the other two arches finished in ~1 hour | 02:49 |
| HFSPLUS | !ops | 03:42 |
| ubottu | Help! SteveA, kiko-phone, Kamion, daniels, Kinnison, stub, daf, carlos, spiv, BradB, salgado, lifeless, or jamesh | 03:42 |
| === mcasadevall is now known as NCommander | ||
| MFen | when i've merged a branch, it sticks around with its comments | 06:13 |
| MFen | if i clean it up, the comments go with it. they really ought to go into the bug or something. why don't they? | 06:14 |
| spiv | MFen: a merged branch is hidden by the default searches, though. | 06:32 |
| spiv | MFen: so removing it isn't really any cleaner, because it's not in anyone's way. And leaving alone leaves the comments intact, as you say. | 06:34 |
| MFen | well, i needed to delete a branch which this branch depended on | 06:35 |
| MFen | so it's not inert. | 06:35 |
| spiv | Depended on in which sense? | 06:35 |
| spiv | As in, a prerequisite branch of a merge proposal? | 06:36 |
| MFen | yes | 06:36 |
| MFen | and you can't do that when the other branch still exists | 06:36 |
| spiv | Hmm, and deleting the prerequisite removes that merge proposal? That does sound suboptimal. | 06:36 |
| spiv | The merge proposal should probably be deactivated, but I agree with you that it should still exist. | 06:37 |
| spiv | Sounds like something it's worth filing a bug about. | 06:37 |
| spiv | I'm curious about why you needed to delete that branch, though? | 06:37 |
| MFen | i made a mess of several branches and needed to start over | 06:40 |
| === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann | ||
| === MTeck-Linux is now known as MTeck-ricer | ||
| === menesis1 is now known as menesis | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| hit^ | hi, can anyone explain me this: No translation activities recorded for <team name here>. | 16:01 |
| hit^ | why doesn't translations show up there? | 16:02 |
| limcore | hi | 18:28 |
| limcore | the topic of #canonical points to a web page... and this web page is private (not accessible) please fix that | 18:28 |
| limcore | 2) I found a bug n launchpad website layout, but whilre reporting it I get oops: Error ID: OOPS-1470H2771 | 18:29 |
| ubottu | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1470H2771 | 18:29 |
| limcore | anyone? | 18:32 |
| ScottK | !weekend | 18:35 |
| ubottu | It's a weekend. Often on weekends, the paid developers, and a lot of the community, may not be around to answer your question. Please be patient, wait longer than you normally would, or try again during the working week. | 18:35 |
| === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann | ||
| === oubiwann_ is now known as oubiwann | ||
| hendrik | hi, i am trying to register an account on bugs.launchpad.net. But after clicking on "register" i can an Oops: OOPS-1470L3116 | 20:24 |
| ubottu | https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1470L3116 | 20:24 |
| limcore | hendrik: I get OOPS all the time, it seems something is broken today | 20:28 |
| === sale_ is now known as sale | ||
| === mcasadevall is now known as NCommander | ||
| benedikt | Where on launchpad should I file a bug report about a laptop not being able to resume from standby? | 23:45 |
| crimsun | against linux; ubuntu-bug linux | 23:47 |
| benedikt | bugs.launchpad.net/linux ? | 23:47 |
| RAOF | No; run “ubuntu-bug linux". That'll grab lots of useful information, then file the bug. | 23:48 |
| benedikt | i would prefer to file the bug report manually and attach relevant information | 23:49 |
| RAOF | Why? | 23:50 |
| benedikt | because last time i used ubuntu-bug i submitted tons of irrelevant information that just made my report look messy. | 23:50 |
| RAOF | The Ubuntu project would like you to use ubuntu-bug; the kernel team have a bunch of scripts to grab information that they need before you submit the bug. | 23:51 |
| RAOF | It's easy to filter out the irrelevant stuff from an apport-filed bug; it's much more annoying to have to ask for information that would have been attached. | 23:52 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!