[00:00] And there was that awesome GNOME Storage mockup + some code, which never went very far but would have been cool. [00:11] So many options, so little time ... [00:13] hi [00:14] is it possible to make a bunlde revision only with selected files from the branch? I want to make a package of only the necessary things, ignoring the debug ones === Noldorin is now known as DukeLetoAtreides === DukeLetoAtreides is now known as TheGiantGodWormT === TheGiantGodWormT is now known as PualMuadhib === PualMuadhib is now known as Noldorin [00:25] oh, i have misunderstood something. What I would like to know is whether it's possible to push the repository to a place where only selected files would be uploaded [00:25] not really === Noldorin is now known as GandalfMuadhib === GandalfMuadhib is now known as Muadalf === Muadalf is now known as Noldorin [00:28] so it's not possible in any way to, say, automatically select files that will go to a package? [00:38] You conceptually could, but it wouldn't do you any good at the far end. Bundles are just another way of moving revs from one place to another, they don't let you do anything you couldn't do with a branch. [00:45] fullermd: i think what i need is something like a new branch with selected files, without even the ability of merging back or commiting new changes. What does that "conceptually" look in practice;> ? [00:46] To do that, you have to create new sets of revisions in some way. [00:46] Manually is one option. There may be some capability in the 'rewrite' plugin that covers what you need. [00:46] Or you can bung up scripting around the CLI to recreate the bits you need, etc. [00:49] thanks [01:16] Can someone help me with unified_diff()? [01:16] I don't get where fromfiledate and tofiledate are defined [01:17] in diff.py, internal_diff() doesn't pass this information to unified_diff(), but the output has them anyway [01:42] I wonder if piotrem wanted 'export' === abentley1 is now known as abentley [02:39] Awww crap [02:40] I just looked at git's manpage ofr fun [02:40] And after working with bazaar, it actually made sense to me [02:40] So now I don't know what to do :/ [02:40] My snobby sense of superioirty is gone. [02:41] Didn't you ever watch _Wheel of Fortune_? bzr users are richer; you have to buy a vowel to spell 'git'. [02:41] fullermd: :P [02:42] I drew a blank; it was the best I could come up with on short notice :p [02:46] Hahahahaha [03:20] * fullermd cries at having to type command lines that start with 'cvs'... [03:22] Now now.... [03:23] * Supertanker comforts fullermd [03:23] It'll all be over soon... [03:23] WHEN BAZAAR TAKES OVER THE WOOOOOOORLD!@ [03:23] I mean, uh [03:23] * Supertanker hides [03:24] it wont [03:25] Drat. [03:33] It doesn't have to take over the WHOLE world. Just the bits that lead to me using CVS. [03:35] cvs is best defeated with rcs+rsync === MarkAtw2 is now known as MarkAtwood [05:58] fullermd: we give a better score in scrabble, too. [06:05] spiv: heh, nice. [12:51] anyone here experiencd with subvertpy? i might end up with some weird questions in the next few hours [15:06] hello [15:07] can I init a repository in a directory that includes already created branches? === Adys_ is now known as Adys === Noldorin_ is now known as Noldorin === Noldorin is now known as foobar === foobar is now known as foobar2 === foobar2 is now known as Noldorin [17:18] All places talk about bzr-hg [17:18] how on earth is I supposed to know that means Mercurial [17:18] I had to dig all way to here [17:18] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr/bzr-hg/trunk/annotate/head:/README [17:18] before I found that out [17:19] :-P [17:20] I started at https://dev.launchpad.net/RoadMap [17:22] Because every geek is supposed to know that Hg is the periodic element Mercury. :D [17:23] shouldn't it be hgial then? [17:24] You know, if I was a native English speaker I would probably have figured that out [17:24] but I didn't even bother start thinking that the name might be related to some element [17:24] also this might have worked, if I had actually started with the revision control system [17:25] and tried to find bzr plugin for it [17:25] although I don't I would have googled with bzr-hg [17:25] googling with bzr mercurial probably would have worked === Sam__ is now known as SamB_XP === Sam__ is now known as SamB_XP [19:50] Hey there, folks. Have a question on bzr. I find I am working on a local copy of a branch, make a change, commit to local, and submit a diff to an approver... then continue working on other docs in the branch... [19:51] if I commit locally again... and create a diff... it conatins my previous changes as well... [19:51] how do I handle these asynchronous changes/approvals? [19:53] should I check out the same branch in different directories... make changes on each, so I can keep each major revision separate until the others are approved upstream? [20:41] Kr0ntab: you could use bzr-pipes, or bzr-loom, or multiple branches, if you're going to be making edits to each thing that the reviewer is looking at. [20:41] Kr0ntab: if you just want to be able to show the older revision, use diff -c -3 (or whatever) [20:41] and if you want a diff of just your latest commit, diff -c -1 [20:44] oh okay... [20:44] lifeless, thanks... [22:31] lifeless: is there a ppa with testtools in it? [22:33] yes [22:33] the subunit one and the bzr beta ppa [22:33] and the losa ppa [22:34] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-testtools [22:34] lists them in fact [22:34] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas?name_filter=python-testtools [22:34] shame that the subunit ppa is below the fold [22:34] beuno: ^ [22:42] mwhudson: ^ [22:42] lifeless: ah, thanks [22:45] lifeless, hi. The Ubuntu Core Devs wanted to hide PPAs a bit so it wouldn't compete with the official packages [22:46] beuno: yes, I know that. I'm pointing out that the best PPA for testtools isn't listed unless you click the 'search others' link [22:47] ah! [22:47] interesting [22:47] beuno: compare the two pages. [22:47] gotta take lynne to the doc.. sms me if needed [22:58] Morning. [23:03] hello all