[00:40] <LLStarks> asac. is it a big problem that upstream still hasn't fixed the autocomplete bug?
[00:41] <gavin> which autocomplete bug?
[00:41] <LLStarks> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/438868
[01:00] <LLStarks> gavin, do think it's a mozilla problem or a fluke of the firefox environment on ubuntu?
[01:01] <gavin> there are mentions in the mozilla bug of compiz and screensavers
[01:01] <gavin> is it just a drawing issue or also functional?
[01:01] <gavin> (i.e. can you still arrow through entries and select them?)
[01:05] <gavin> compiz being involved seems unlikely, but it also appears only to affect some ubuntu builds?
[01:05] <gavin> I dunno, not much to go on there
[14:54] <fta> crimsun, seems like chromium is losing audio after a while (flash)
[15:07] <nigelbabu> Hi, is there a known issue with latest updates to flash and firefox
[15:07] <nigelbabu> there is a user in #ubuntu-bug who is facing some trouble with flash
[21:08] <crimsun> fta: I'm unsure what that means. 32-bit? 64-bit? which version(s) of the non-Free plugin?
[21:08] <fta> crimsun, 32, karmic
[21:08] <crimsun> adobe-flashplugin? flashplugin-installer?
[21:10] <fta> crimsun, flashplugin-installer 10.0.42.34ubuntu0.9.10.1
[21:10] <crimsun> fta: mmkay, so there's possible nspluginwrapper interaction, too
[21:10] <fta> on 32bit?
[21:10] <crimsun> fta: is this reproducible with the native 64-bit alpha refresh?
[21:10] <crimsun> err, sorry
[21:11] <crimsun> meaning is it reproducible with adobe-flashplugin
[21:11] <fta> no idea
[21:11] <crimsun> well, ia32-libs certainly hasn't been resynced in a bit
[21:12] <fta> the thing is that i work for a while, and then poof, no more sound in chromium (only) until i restart it
[21:12] <fta> ia32-libs? i said i'm on a 32bit box
[21:13] <fta> so no x64, no ia32-libs involved
[21:13] <crimsun> fta: yes, I know you're on 32-bit
[21:13] <crimsun> fta: I'm looking at the entire stack currently
[21:15] <crimsun> 32-bit doesn't currently pull in nspluginwrapper, correct?
[21:15] <crimsun> (it certainly seems not to according to debian/control)
[21:16] <fta> exact
[21:17] <crimsun> fta: does PA actually log anything about it dying?
[21:18] <fta> hm, not sure, where should i look? syslog?
[21:18] <crimsun> sure, or kill PA and start a verbose log (wiki/PulseAudio/Log)
[21:19] <crimsun> or use pactl and bump the logging verboseness
[21:19] <fta> it doesn't seem to die, the other apps are fine. it seems it's just chromium loosing its link to pa, or to whatever it uses to send the sound
[21:22] <crimsun> fta: and this is with the latest libasound2-plugins updates?
[21:22] <crimsun> on lucid, that is
[21:22] <fta> i'm still using karmic
[21:22] <fta> :P
[21:22] <crimsun> sigh
[21:23] <fta> well, i decided to hold on to it for a while, to experience stability, but so far, it's been the worse experience ever
[21:24] <crimsun> yeah, by the time you get all the fixes backported, you may as well run lucid.
[21:25] <fta> 2 days ago, the new kernel trashed my grub on reboot -> dead
[21:25] <fta> old bug from jaunty, still there :(
[21:26] <fta> various stuff are crashing
[21:26] <fta> -rw------- 1 fta  fta  15393563 2010-01-09 12:51 _usr_lib_totem_totem-plugin-viewer.1000.crash
[21:26] <fta> -rw------- 1 fta  fta  11499721 2010-01-09 23:00 _usr_bin_rhythmbox.1000.crash
[21:26] <fta> -rw------- 1 root root   947495 2010-01-10 22:07 _sbin_init.0.crash
[21:26] <fta> *sigh*
[22:51] <EzraR> anyone around that is familliar with the enigmail package (the package itself)
[22:52] <EzraR> other addons are probally packaged the same way
[22:52] <EzraR> im trying to figure out how to go about aplying a patch to the source
[22:53] <EzraR> the source is in a tarball that gets extracted during build
[22:53] <EzraR> and the patchs seem a bit confusing
[22:54]  * EzraR prods asac for signs of life
[22:56]  * micahg pulls us enigmail source
[22:56] <micahg> *up
[22:56] <micahg> EzraR: enigmail will be upgraded to 1.0 soon
[22:56] <EzraR> in karmic?
[22:57] <EzraR> was going to try and get a bug sru'd
[22:57] <micahg> no, not soon in karmic
[22:57] <micahg> maybe in ppa
[22:59] <asac> post what you have now ;)
[23:00] <asac> sry
[23:00] <asac> ;)
[23:00] <EzraR> its a patch from upstream
[23:00] <asac> EzraR: yes. the patch thing is messy ;)
[23:00] <asac> whatfor?
[23:00] <asac> its kind of dpatch based
[23:00] <asac> just that you cant use dpatch-edit-patch
[23:00] <EzraR> emails that are encrypted and signed not showing up as signed
[23:01] <asac> so do a patch manually and add the dpatch header manually
[23:01] <asac> in tb2?
[23:01] <EzraR> yes
[23:01] <asac> ok
[23:01] <asac> let me know
[23:01] <EzraR> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/enigmail/+bug/504738
[23:03] <EzraR> http://pastebin.com/m6d5ad5aa
[23:04] <EzraR> ok but which 00list do i put it in
[23:05] <micahg> patch is a one-liner which is nice
[23:05] <asac> EzraR: .thunderbird
[23:05] <asac> we dont build moz packages anymore
[23:08] <EzraR> ok, ill give it a shot
[23:08] <EzraR> thank you
[23:09] <and`> asac: hey
[23:09] <and`> asac: we added a better udev rule in Debian for g-bluetooth
[23:09] <and`> you could re-base the Ubuntu package on that
[23:10] <and`> looks like the Debian's udev maintainer was happy with it, so it's worth to move it to Ubuntu as well
[23:12] <asac> and`: diff?
[23:13] <and`> asac: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552185
[23:13] <and`> at the end of the bug report
[23:14] <and`> message #126
[23:46] <EzraR> asac: do all the patches need the bit of script that are in the other patches
[23:46] <EzraR> for example:
[23:46] <EzraR> http://pastebin.com/md417bae
[23:53] <asac> i think so ;)
[23:54] <asac> but havent really touched it for a while
[23:56] <and`> asac: so?
[23:56] <and`> asac: do you think you can rebase the Ubuntu package now?
[23:57] <asac> i dont see a patch
[23:58] <and`> asac: message #126
[23:58] <and`> asac: the udev rule is posted there
[23:58] <asac> whats the difference
[23:58] <asac> ?
[23:59] <and`> asac: it's a bit better made and safer
[23:59] <asac> whats the technical diff ;)
[23:59] <asac> i dont have the current file in my head :)