[14:34] <xteejx> note: the above is an open bug in linux
[15:55] <xteejx1> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin How come Hardy-Karmic have a later version than Lucid??
[15:56] <micahg> xteejx1: that's handled separately from the regualr archive
[15:57] <xteejx> I know its universe, but I can't understand why the older version have later versions
[15:58] <micahg> xteejx: not universe, partner
[15:58] <xteejx> micahg: without sounding stupid (too late) what's the difference?
[15:58] <micahg> universe/multiverse is uploaded by MOTU, partner is only uploaded by canonical
[15:58] <micahg> AFAIK
[15:59] <xteejx> ahhhh i see
[15:59] <micahg> xteejx: I suggest filing a bug as the partner uploaded deadline is soon
[15:59] <xteejx> umm ok :)
[16:01] <xteejx> It's hardly a great bug report, but points the problem out bug 508799
[16:01] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 508799 in adobe-flashplugin "[lucid] flash version in older releases is older upstream version" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/508799
[16:30] <om26er> there have been many bugs that upstream don't update as fixed but they are actually fixed in development releases so after testing should they be marked fixed?
[16:35] <xteejx> Yes
[16:35] <xteejx> Maybe put a note on the upstream bug report too
[16:36] <om26er> xteejx, ok, thanx
[16:37] <micahg> om26er: only if it's confirmed as an actual issue in the app
[16:38] <om26er> sure
[16:38] <micahg> and if you see an upstream issue is fixed, comment on the upstream bug
[16:40] <om26er> micahg, thanks, will do that
[17:11] <vish> om26er: the empathy bug is actually not fixed  , the user wants the dropbox to use the *full* width
[17:13] <vish> *dropdown combobox
[17:25] <xteejx> What is the procedure for KDE bugs now, are we politely asking everyone to try the latest now, since the KDE devs are through with working on KDE3 ??
[17:26] <micahg> xteejx: upstream bugs are opened upstream and closed in LP
[17:26] <xteejx> micahg: I don't understand
[17:27] <micahg> one sec
[17:27] <xteejx> we're closing the LP bugs ?
[17:27]  * micahg is pulling up the docs
[17:27] <micahg> xteejx: http://www.kubuntu.org/news/timelord
[17:28] <micahg> I'll be back online in about 45 min
[17:28] <xteejx> timelord? is this doctor who? hehe
[17:28] <xteejx> thanks though micahg :)
[18:49] <xteejx> micahg: ping
[18:49] <micahg> hi xteejx
[18:50] <xteejx> micahg: Hey, I had a look at that timelord thing, but it didn't say anything about old versions, just future development
[18:50] <micahg> xteejx: I suggest hoping in #kubuntu-dev and asking
[18:51] <xteejx> another room I haven't seen hehe will do cheers micah :)
[18:51] <xteejx> no such room i'll /list
[18:51] <micahg> maybe #kubuntu-devel
[18:52] <xteejx> That's the one ;)
[19:06] <xteejx> micahg: Usual procedure apparently, check latest version, and close KDE3 bugs that aren't security problems.
[19:07] <micahg> xteejx: k
[19:07] <xteejx> thanks for pointing me to the right peeps :)
[19:07] <micahg> xteejx: np
[20:52] <xteejx> Aren't nvidia drivers in place yet in Lucid?
[20:53] <micahg> xteejx: ask in #ubuntu+1
[20:53] <xteejx> ok
[20:54] <BUGabundo> xteejx: are for me now
[20:54] <xteejx> Hmmm, jockey won't install 173 or 'current'
[20:55]  * hggdh wishes for a working ATI
[20:55]  * xteejx wishes for an AMD phenom
[20:55] <xteejx> :P
[20:56] <fujimitsu> saw a barebone kit with a phenom for under 300 dollars
[20:56] <micahg> hggdh: I saw something about ATI not being ready for the Lucid kernel yet
[20:56] <xteejx> im in the uk sadly
[20:57] <BUGabundo> hggdh: forget ati
[20:57] <BUGabundo> its still stucks
[20:57] <hggdh> micahg: yes... Still running VESA. But now even the virtual consoles are hosed
[21:12] <crimsun> hggdh: if you're in a pinch, make sure /boot is mounted, purge plymouth, allow the initramfs to be regenerated, and reboot
[21:19] <hggdh> crimsun: thank ypu will try it now
[21:20] <hggdh> brb
[21:21] <crimsun> I was bitten by the latest cryptsetup upload (really bug 496765).
[21:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 496765 in plymouth "plymouth ask-for-password doesn't display --prompt argument" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/496765
[21:25] <hggdh> yeeeeehhh I have the virstual consoles again!!
[21:25] <hggdh> thank you, crimsun
[21:27] <crimsun> np
[22:21] <hggdh> micahg: what is your take on bug 508867? Just curious
[22:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 508867 in firefox-3.5 "following any link from giganticurl.com leads whole system inresponsibility" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/508867
[22:21] <micahg> haven't looked yet
[22:22] <hggdh> fun, even more with the typo on the title (or is it a typo?)
[22:22] <micahg> hggdh: I think it's an abuse of URLs
[22:22] <micahg> I have to see if it violates a standard or not
[22:22] <micahg> if it does it's not a bug
[22:22] <micahg> if it doesn't then it might be
[22:23] <hggdh> I followed one of the link, just out of curiosity, and got a 404
[23:43] <RiotingPacifist> Just want to check this is a kdm bug before i file a report, basically if i boot to a kernel without ipv6 support i get the following in kdm.log http://pastebin.com/d5d31271c