/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/01/18/#ubuntu-learning.txt

HellowQuestion: Will Ubuntu User Days in Spanish have the same topics as the main one, or a different set of topics?01:04
cjohnstonHellow: similar01:05
DiegoTcHellow, some will be similar01:05
DiegoTcwe were planning in making similar,but not so many speakers appear :(01:05
HellowHeh, I'm composing a blog post.01:07
HellowNext up: Sending in my introduction and outline.01:07
HellowThis is going to be a /fun/ week.01:07
* DiegoTc remember he had to send emails about the USD01:08
DiegoTc:(01:08
HellowWhee: http://hellow.posterous.com/ubuntu-user-days01:13
DiegoTccjohnston, I want to ask you something01:15
DiegoTcin ubuntu-classroom there is a bot that saves the logs of each session?01:15
cjohnstonappears as such01:18
DiegoTcwhat we have to do, to have the bot at #ubuntu-charlas do you know?01:19
cjohnstonI will try to find out for you01:25
DiegoTcokay thanks01:26
cjohnstonDiegoTc: still here?01:45
DiegoTccjohnston, yes01:53
cjohnstonDiegoTc: I have requested more info.. Will get back to you01:53
cjohnstong'nite01:53
DiegoTcokay01:53
doctormopleia2: Hey there01:54
cprofittneed an opinion on a presentation background02:05
cprofitthttp://i49.tinypic.com/2klnxk.jpg02:05
pleia2cprofitt: looks nice :)02:11
pleia2doctormo: hey02:11
pleia2..but actually heading back to spend time with my mother (she's in town visiting)02:11
doctormopleia2: thanks for approving my comment.02:12
cprofittthanks pleia202:13
cprofittI will likely publish it CC02:13
doctormocprofitt: Ah the question is, which CC :-D02:21
cprofittthere is no question there02:22
cprofittBy NC SA02:22
doctormocprofitt: Non copyleft, what's it for?02:24
cprofitt?02:24
cprofittNon copyleft?02:24
cprofittnot sure I follow02:24
doctormocprofitt: Copyleft is a term for a particlar kind of license terms similar to the GPL and was coined by Stallman.02:25
cprofittI see... so how, then, is CC-BY-NC-SA not copyleft02:25
doctormocprofitt: It's got NC on it, that makes it too restrictive for copyleft.02:25
cprofittI see.02:26
cprofittoh, well.02:26
doctormoJust incase we want to use it for presentations in learning or in loco stuff... can't commit it launchpad you see.02:26
cprofittbecause they are commercial?02:26
doctormocprofitt: No, because they forbid material that isn't copyleft or less.02:27
cprofittlink02:27
cprofittodd... launchpad itself appears to be copyright...02:28
doctormohttps://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-registry/+bug/17466102:28
doctormocprofitt: Actually launchpad is copyrighted under a copyleft license... the AGPLv302:29
cprofittwow... and Launchpad logo is not copyleft either02:29
cprofittit is BY-ND02:29
doctormoQuote: Just to be completely clear: none of the NC ("non-commercial") or ND ("no-derivatives") CC licenses are open-source. If a project wants to use those variants, they'll have to arrange proprietary hosting with us.02:29
cprofittI guess Canonical violated its own terms...02:29
doctormoAh well ND on a logo... what a surprise.02:29
cprofittthus rendering them unenforceable02:29
cprofittOoops02:29
doctormoCanonical don't have to abide by community rules... see ubuntuone02:29
cprofittguess Mark needs some better lawyers02:30
cprofittthey do have to abide by the rules of the 'device' they are using02:30
cprofittsame as Apple02:30
doctormoNo, they own launchpad and I'm betting they have "a proprietary hosting agreement" with themselves.02:30
cprofittthus one of the possible challenges to Apple's stupid EULA02:30
cprofittall that and a bag of chips leaves it to a court to decide02:31
doctormoI've had a project kicked off launchpad because of NC, so I know.02:31
doctormocprofitt: The problem with that argument is that in Apple's case they are selling devices where ownership changes hands and in this case it is a service agreement that Canonical to not have to enter for their own works.02:32
cprofitthttps://help.launchpad.net/Legal/ProjectLicensing02:32
cprofittnot sure you are right doctormo02:33
cprofittdoctormo: in Apple's case they violated their own EULA02:33
cprofittthey distributed software (iTunes, Safari) with the same boiler player EULA as OS X02:33
doctormoIt must not discriminate against persons, groups or against fields of endeavour. The licence of software hosted by Launchpad can not discriminate against anyone or any group of users and cannot restrict users from using the software for a particular field of endeavour - a business for example.02:33
cprofittit says it can only be loaded on an Apple branded hardware02:33
cprofittyet it clearly is loaded on non-Apple branded hardware all the time02:34
doctormocprofitt: There is a difference too in that Canonical are not in a business relationship with their users, the agreement is non binding on their end.02:34
cprofittand Apple has failed to defend that copyright02:34
cprofittI am not sure NC prohibits a person using the software in their business02:34
cprofitt... though certainly it would prohibit them using my background in a presentation they charged for02:35
doctormocprofitt: Of course it does, you can use it within the the business, but not as a part of your business.02:35
cprofittI really have no desire to argue philosophical or legal items with you Doc02:35
cprofittyou, nor I, have any experience with the law directly02:35
cprofittand our indirect experience is not enough to sway either of us02:36
cprofittso it really only serves to cause a 'rift'02:36
doctormocprofitt: For me it's not an argument, I'm simply explaining what I know to be the case, launchpad will reject CC-NC works.02:36
cprofittbased on what I have read... I am not sure that IS the case... and if it IS the case then there may be some folks that need to examine things...02:37
doctormoWhy and how are non of my concerns, interesting mental puzzels, but not more.02:37
cprofittthough to be honest... it does not matter.02:37
cprofittI am not going to submit my background for use on LP02:37
doctormoheh02:37
doctormocprofitt: See for me it's quite simple, "Do I intent to re-license the work for profit" If no, NC is costly and shouldn't be used, if yes then NC can be used with caution.02:38
cprofittIf I intend to use for profit then I can just do that... I own the copyright02:39
cprofittso... the question is if I want others to do so.02:39
doctormoIn the cases of art and design, I have no desire to relicense for profit and to be honest if someone takes the work and makes money from it, I say good on them.02:39
cprofittI certainly have no desire to let anyone profit from my art work...02:40
cprofittunlike software I am not sure anyone would 'add value' to my artwork that would 'encourage' me to want to 'share' it02:40
doctormoInteresting isn't it, it's a socialist thing perhaps, give to the greater good what you can spare to let others profit from.02:40
cprofittallowing for commerical works02:40
cprofittnot sure how the greater good is served by allowing someone to use artwork for profit02:41
cprofittinteresting to see the wiki is not copyleft either02:43
doctormocprofitt: It's CC-BY-SA02:43
cprofittno, sir it is not.02:44
cprofitthttp://www.ubuntu.com/legal02:44
cprofittread the first two paragraphs02:44
doctormocprofitt: What has the license on www.ubuntu.com got to do with wiki.ubuntu.com? they're two different systems, authors and rationales.02:50
cprofittdoc... good question why don't you ask the developer or sysadmins at Canonical who linked them02:50
cprofittwindow 1102:51
cprofittI hit 'Legal' at the bottom of the page on the wiki and it takes me there02:51
cprofittwindow 1102:52
cprofittgotta remember the darn '/'02:53
cprofitthey Vantrax02:58
Vantraxhi02:58
cprofittwhat do you think of this presentation background - http://ftbeowulf.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/dr2.png02:59
Vantraxlittle heavy but good03:08
Vantraxid drop the opacity by half03:08
cprofittits for a presentation on data recovery03:09
cprofittopacity of which element?03:09
Vantraxthe top section is ok03:21
Vantraxthe lower half should all be lighter03:21
cprofittK03:22
cprofittI used white text... and readability seems fine...03:22
cprofittfor black I agree it would need to be darker03:22
cprofittI mean lighter03:22
cprofittlol03:22
doctormo_pleia2: I almost got the video done for the ground control project, but some last minute niggle killed those plans, so I'm hoping tomorrow will fair better.03:40
pleia2yay ground control video04:18
=== wh1901 is now known as Guest87863
=== txwikinger2 is now known as txwikinger
Pendulumcjohnston: have you heard from everyone with intros and outlines yet?18:53
cprofittPendulum: I added mine, but have not gotten any feedback yet18:58
Pendulumcprofitt: I think yours looks good :)19:00
cprofittthanks.19:00
starcraftmanPendulum: just a note, I submitted my intro and outline. I also wrote my whole presentation and pastebinned. Will work on it some more before, but it's a good basic.19:21
starcraftmanpastebin is on my outline page if ya want a preview.19:21
Pendulumstarcraftman: I noticed, thank you :)19:25
PendulumOutline looked good :)19:25
starcraftmanPendulum: np, your welcome. Now I'll get back to stripping my recently RIP pc, a sad day.19:27
cjohnstonuggh.. Anyone seen nigel today?22:33
Hellowcjohnston, Not so far.22:50
cjohnstonpleia2: ?22:56
cprofitt_so how many instructors have dropped?23:31
doctormocprofitt_: dropped?23:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!