/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/01/20/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

asac!test01:17
ubottuhrm?01:17
[reed]asac: ping01:59
asac[reed]: yes01:59
asaci am out01:59
asac;)01:59
asac1 minute to 302:00
asacwhats up?02:00
[reed]PM02:00
=== asac_ is now known as asac
BUGabundo_remotemorning08:59
BUGabundo_remoteasac: $ firefox-3.7 -profile /tmp/firefox  -no-remote file://`pwd`/startup.html#`python -c ‘import time; print int(time.time() * 1000);’`09:29
BUGabundo_remotebash: command substitution: line 1: syntax error near unexpected token `('09:29
BUGabundo_remotebash: command substitution: line 1: `python -c ‘import time; print int(time.time() * 1000);’'09:29
BUGabundo_remotefrom http://blog.mozilla.com/tglek/2010/01/19/chromium-vs-minefield-cold-startup-performance-comparison/09:29
[reed]change ‘import time; print int(time.time() * 1000);’ to 'import time; print int(time.time() * 1000);'09:31
[reed]so09:32
[reed]firefox-3.7 -profile /tmp/firefox  -no-remote file://`pwd`/startup.html#`python -c 'import time; print int(time.time() * 1000);'`09:32
BUGabundo_remotethanks [reed]09:32
BUGabundo_remoteahh ' vs ´09:32
[reed]yes09:33
BUGabundo_remote[reed]: no echo at all...09:33
[reed]hmm09:33
BUGabundo_remoteno window opens, nothing09:33
BUGabundo_remotechromium does open, but fails to open the correct page09:34
LLStarks|Lazyasac, have you ever noticed how you can't use back after clicking home in firefox?10:02
LLStarks|Lazyunless you hammer back really quickly after10:02
LLStarks|Lazyand forces you to use the dropdown menu for it10:02
asacLLStarks|Lazy: yes11:10
LLStarks|Lazyfeature?11:10
asacusability bug11:15
BUGabundo_remotehumm called?11:16
[reed]asac: bug #?11:29
asac[reed]: thats ubuntu specific11:39
asacyou know the bug number ;)11:39
asacit will go away11:39
[reed]ah11:40
asacabout:home is the solution11:41
[reed]you should do that already11:42
[reed]:)11:42
asacwe are on it ... on it11:45
* asac killed the daily 3.6 build with his all-in-one-commit it seems L;)11:47
* asac goes and fixes11:47
LLStarks|Lazyoooh. it's fixed?12:03
asacsoon12:07
LLStarks|Lazyit's been around for at least a year12:22
LLStarks|Lazythanks12:22
fta2BUGabundo_remote, what about SSL?12:29
BUGabundo_remotewb fta13:23
BUGabundo_remotefta you were missed yesterday13:23
BUGabundo_remotefta I'm no so sure about Ch snaps are about SSL13:23
BUGabundo_remoteI just get it on any page13:23
BUGabundo_remotesome work fine, some don't13:23
BUGabundo_remotesome always fail, others just fail some times13:23
fta2BUGabundo_remote, did you look for an existing bug?13:28
BUGabundo_remotenot yet13:28
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
BUGabundo_remotefta: (02:52:49 PM) bjsnider: i think it's ironic that a lot of google's pages are snapping14:54
asacccheney: good morning ;)16:17
ccheneyasac: hello :)16:45
ccheneyasac: checked email, about to start working on the patch, got OOo uploaded yesterday its just waiting on a mir to be processed now16:46
asackk16:48
ccheneyargh my OOo upload needs to be redone due to arm :-\18:33
micahgasac: so, FF36 release tomorrow, do we need to do anything?19:04
asacmicahg: i am working on it19:07
asaci moved ffox 3.6 to all-static now19:07
asacin .head19:07
asacwaiting for a build in my sandbox ppa to finish19:07
asacthen wanted to change package names which can be quite tricky i guess ;)19:07
asacfta: are you there?19:08
asacfta: i think i would need your services ;)19:08
ftai am19:08
asacfta: so ... source rename19:08
asac;)19:08
asaci want to start and move the firefox-3.6 package to firefox source19:09
asacas "current stable" channel19:09
asacbut mozclient doesnt like that idea ;)19:09
ftawhy?19:09
asacnot sure how to best do that as "firefox" would now point to 3.6, then to 3.7 etc.19:09
asacfta: it looks for "sourcepackage.mk"19:09
asacbut we only have firefox-3.6.mk19:10
asacrather than firefox.mk19:10
ftarename it then19:10
asacso what i think we could do is to ship links19:10
asace.g. we ship a link firefox.mk -> firefox-3.6.mk19:10
asacfirefox-next.mk -> firefox-3.7.mk19:10
asacor beta19:10
asacnot sure what name there (and for now i wont touch those packages/branches)19:10
ftawhy not just rename it? it's all in package so it's independent19:11
asacwell. technically it maps to a branch specific to firefox-3.619:11
asacand only for now the "packagename" firefox points to firefox-3.619:11
asacat some point it would be firefox-old19:11
asacor something19:11
asacoh19:11
asachmm19:11
asacyou say its in package19:11
asaclet me check19:11
ftamozclient uses whatever you use for MOZCLIENT_PROJECTNAME19:12
ftaMOZCLIENT_PROJECTNAME   := $(DEBIAN_NAME)19:12
ftaMOZCLIENT_PROJECTDIR    := $(CURDIR)/debian/mozclient19:12
ftainclude $(CURDIR)/debian/mozclient/$(DEBIAN_NAME).mk19:12
ftathat's all for mozclient19:13
asacok i will chek what happens if i just rename19:13
asacthat feels liek it19:13
asacthanks19:13
asachmm. can we drop the stuff in /usr/share?19:13
asacat least for the branches we already have in package?19:13
ftahm, the include should use MOZCLIENT_PROJECTNAME rather than DEBIAN_NAME19:13
ftayes19:13
ftaff,xul,tb should be ok to drop from m-d19:14
asacyeah19:14
asacnoted19:14
ftaprism,sm are still needed19:14
asachow is MOZCLIENT_PROJECTNAME ment to be different?19:16
asacok trying to produce orig19:18
ftaasac, btw, i had to re-add third_party/cld, not sure it has an impact on your license work19:26
asacdid we remove that because of the licensing?19:27
ftaanyone else seeing the chromium snaps BUGabundo reported??19:27
asacwhat is that? what is that needed for?19:27
ftaasac, to build :)19:27
ftahttp://www.osnews.com/story/22764/Why_Firefox_s_Future_Lies_in_Google_s_Hands19:32
mconnorasac: are you guys shipping a branded 64-bit build?19:41
ftayes19:46
micahgasac: I was wondering more if you need anything from me :)19:50
asacmicahg: let me finish this ;) ... lets talk in 2h if possible19:52
micahgasac: sure , np19:52
gnomefreakmicahg: did you get my comment on SM2 the other day19:54
* micahg doesn't remember gnomefreak19:54
gnomefreakmicahg: SM2 using -devscripts it grabs source for 2.1 still, also the versioning needs to be changed19:55
micahgah, yes, gnomefreak19:55
gnomefreakit grabs 2.0_2.119:55
micahggnomefreak: it needs to be moved in package, fta fixed it in ff.head branches19:55
micahggnomefreak: sorry too terse19:56
gnomefreakif he uses my branch ad does his changes might be easier19:56
asacidea is to pull that in debian/mozclient/ in sm package19:56
gnomefreakah ok19:56
micahggnomefreak: 1.  it needs to be moved in package, 2 (separate) the fix is similar to what fta did to ff3.5 and up in .head19:56
asaci think tbird is better to copy it from19:57
* gnomefreak didnt know about the changes to .head19:57
asacboth use comm-central approach19:57
gnomefreakasac: doesnt ff use comm-central as well?19:57
gnomefreaki am 99% sure sunbird does19:57
micahggnomefreak: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird-3.0.head/revision/13719:57
gnomefreakmicahg: thanks looking19:58
micahggnomefreak: this too: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/%7Emozillateam/thunderbird/thunderbird-3.0.head/revision/13619:58
micahggnomefreak: ff37 is mozilla-central, comm-central is for the mail based apps (tb, sm, sunbird)20:00
gnomefreakthat is a big change however it looks fairly generic for the 1.9.1 branch at least20:00
gnomefreakmicahg: ah ok20:00
gnomefreakoh i see why the change. it is now using the *.sh script instead of using *.conf20:01
gnomefreakmicahg: if you look at the revision to debian/mozclient/thunderbird-3.0.conf. line 25 (before changes) it uses | cut -d'"' -f3,7`;  is the f3.7 refering to firefox-3.7?20:03
micahggnomefreak: no, that should be fields 3 and 7 :)20:04
micahgs/should be/is20:04
gnomefreakah makes more sense that way :)20:04
gnomefreakIIRC Sm2 == 1.9.1 branch right?20:05
micahggnomefreak: SM2.0 is 1.9.120:05
* micahg thinks comm-central is 1.9.2 right now20:05
gnomefreakyeah thought so. the script that was written is echoing 1.9.220:05
gnomefreakSM has always been 1 release behind as i recall20:06
gnomefreak1 release refering to xulrunner20:06
micahgwell, once comm-central branches again, I think it'll catch up, but I don't know when ;)20:06
micahgalthough moz-central might branch for 3.7 by then20:07
gnomefreakwell 2.1 should be on 1.9.220:07
micahgidk20:07
micahgyes, along with tb3,120:07
gnomefreakMozilla keeps changing things its hard to guess when anything will happen20:07
* gnomefreak goes for smoke while tb works20:08
micahggnomefreak: BTW, I asked for some PPA bugs to be reported in LP20:10
micahgspecifically for TB3.0 and FF3.620:10
micahgso we can get the bugs fixed before they're released to everyone20:11
gnomefreaknow you tell me ;)20:13
micahgheh, sorry, I've been meaning to discuss it as a group, it's not blanket, I've just suggested to a few people20:13
gnomefreakmicahg: ok thats fine with me just lets make sure all PPA bugs have upstream bug attached to it when it is reported20:14
gnomefreakif i see the bugs i closed with PPA i will reopen if you didnt already20:14
micahgI jsut reopened one20:15
gnomefreakk20:15
micahgwe discussed have certain PPA bugs in LP in the -bugcontrol meeting, so it was up to the individual teams if they wanted them20:16
* gnomefreak keeps missing meetings 20:17
* micahg thinks we need a mozillateam meeting :)20:18
gnomefreakwould be a good idea since so much has changed since last meeting :)20:19
gnomefreakasac: fta how does that sound? (the meeting idea) ^^^20:29
gnomefreakalso if anyone knows of a way to pause "top" for a screenshot please let me know20:30
micahggnomefreak: CTRL-C ?20:33
gnomefreakmicahg: i thought it cleared the top info  using that but i will check when im done with killing processes and email thanks20:34
micahgfor me in xterm q or CTRL-C both still show top20:34
gnomefreakmicahg: it works thanks20:35
gnomefreakg-terminal works too20:35
gnomefreakfiregpg and flashgot should have no issues getting them from debian right?20:36
* gnomefreak wonders what the big deal is of bradley moving back to Debian20:39
ftactrl S, then ctrl Q to unfreeze20:41
gnomefreakfta: for top?20:43
ftafor everything in a shell20:43
gnomefreakthanks that works great :)20:43
gnomefreakmicahg: i sent out email about a meeting :)21:10
gnomefreakto mailing list21:10
gnomefreakok while updating im going to grab something to eat. be back soon21:12
ftadamn, vdpau is broken in lucid21:14
=== cyphermo1 is now known as cyphermox
BUGabundofta: pong22:05
BUGabundo(10:06:42 PM) bjsnider: BUGabundo, you meant he chrome issue? i are 64 bits yes i are22:06
ftayou am :)22:07
ftaBUGabundo, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=3243622:08
BUGabundofixed... 2h ago22:09
BUGabundoso tomorrow build ?22:09
ftaBUGabundo, supposedly fixed by r36625, the ppa has 4.0.303.0~svn20100120r3662722:09
ftaplease upgrade and retry22:10
BUGabundo  Installed: 4.0.303.0~svn20100120r36627-0ubuntu1~ucd122:10
BUGabundoSNAPS22:10
BUGabundodamnt it22:10
BUGabundorestart Ch22:11
BUGabundorestart did it22:11
BUGabundofixed for me22:11
ftagood22:12
BUGabundoshould I comment on the bug ?22:12
BUGabundothanks for looking for it fta22:13
ftano need to comment22:13
ftano i need to understand with vpdau is broken in lucid22:15
ftanow22:15
fta-with+why22:15
ftagrrr22:15
BUGabundoits not22:16
fta[vdpau] Error when calling vdp_device_create_x11: 122:16
ftaError opening/initializing the selected video_out (-vo) device.22:16
asac!test22:24
ubottuhrm?22:24
ftasame after a reboot on the new kernel :(22:25
BUGabundo.32 ?22:26
BUGabundoforget.. no nvidia in .3322:26
fta32-1122:27
BUGabundoLinux BluBUG 2.6.32-10-generic #14-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 7 17:38:08 UTC 2010 x86_64 GNU/Linux22:28
BUGabundobut my card is crypled22:28
BUGabundoso I don't have vdpau22:28
ftahm22:31
ftaseems to be a problem with /usr/lib/libvdpau_nvidia.so vs /usr/lib/nvidia-current/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so22:40
ftaone is 185.18.36, the other is 190.5322:40
ftamost probably this: update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of /usr/lib32/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 because associated file /usr/lib32/nvidia-current/vdpau/libvdpau_nvidia.so.1 (of link group gl_conf) doesn't exist.22:50
ftabug 51039023:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 510390 in nvidia-drivers-ubuntu "broken alternatives broke vdpau in mplayer" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51039023:03
* BUGabundo shrugs23:03
ftaso fixed for me, lost 45min, an episode :P23:05
BUGabundo?23:05
ftaread my bug, i provide the workaround at the end23:06
BUGabundoheh23:06
jcastrofta: confirming23:06
ftagood23:07
jcastrohey speaking of vdpau23:08
jcastrodid I ever ask you about having the chromium ffmpeg use vdpau?23:08
ftayou did, and my answer was that it's not there yet. i can re-ask23:09
jcastrooh, I was just wondering23:09
jcastroit's all a blur23:10
ftajcastro, <awong> fta: yeah...vdpau support is not trivial at all.  There's at least 4 different people trying to work on trying to get some sort of hardware compositing support into chromium.  Before that work is finished. vdpau support in ffmpeg would likely buy us very little.23:24
ftajcastro, http://code.google.com/p/chromium-os/issues/detail?id=926  (chromium OS), then follow the blocked-on bugs :P23:29
jcastroaha, thanks for the bug, I will star23:35
jcastro<323:35
=== gandi_ is now known as gandi

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!