=== seb128_ is now known as seb128 [10:06] what's the correct target for issue regarding X and resuming? [10:06] from hibernate/suspend [10:12] hyperair, 'linux' is usually a good starting point [10:13] bryyce: no, i think this is purely X. there are some vt-switching issues, and after that, the wallpaper changes to some hideous black and white weird looking thing [10:14] bug #510004 [10:14] Launchpad bug 510004 in pm-utils "[lucid regression] strange resume from suspend to RAM" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/510004 [10:14] that [10:15] nvidia-graphics-driver-180 then [10:15] actually, just n-g-d [10:16] ah, yeah with -nvidia the kernel team probably couldn't help you any more than we could [10:16] indeed [10:16] i figured as much [10:17] night [10:18] night [10:38] is there a bug about libgl1-mesa-glx being sort of unusable on the buildds? [10:42] geser: what do you mean? [10:42] tseliot: e.g. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38095009/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.octave-ad_1.0.6-3_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz [10:43] this also happens with -0ubuntu7 (tested in my pbuilder) [10:43] although the postinst calls ldconfig, it only triggers it's run at the end (which seems to be to late) [10:44] from a look at /sbin/ldconfig this might work: "LDCONFIG_NOTRIGGER=y ldconfig" in postinst [10:45] this should force ldconfig being run right now and making libGL.so.1 available for the following packages being configured [10:45] yes, I was about to say the same about ldconfig. Let me check LDCONFIG_NOTRIGGER [10:46] yes, that should be our problem [10:55] geser: I'll try to build the package in my chroot with export LDCONFIG_NOTRIGGER=y [11:13] bummer, it's building without notrigger here... [11:13] which I guess is why you mentioned the problem as affecting buildds [12:25] geser: ok, I've just uploaded 7.7-0ubuntu8. Please test octave3.2 again when mesa is published [12:59] tjaalton: in case you didn't notice: libxcb got finally synced today (it triggered a bug in LP which made the previous sync attempts fail) === yofel_ is now known as yofel [14:11] tseliot: octave-ad build successfully with mesa 7.7-0ubuntu8 [14:12] \o/ [14:12] geser: thanks for testing [15:53] jbarnes: any ideas as to what can be causing this? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/359587/ [15:53] when switching users (i.e. when launching an additional X session on a different tty) [15:54] s/launching/trying to launch/ === Amaranth_ is now known as Amaranth [17:55] geser: yep I noticed, nice [19:04] wow, didnt notice we had all these plymouth themes installed as well in lucid, solar looks great but the progress bar is a little messed up [19:05] sudo plymouth-set-default-theme solar --rebuild-initrd incase anyone else hasn't seen it :D [19:26] are there any screenshots available for all themes? [19:28] just found a few here http://www.webupd8.org/2010/01/look-at-ubuntu-lucid-plymouth-themes.html [19:31] tseliot: is it me or does that look like plymouths fault? [19:32] sebner, https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/506717/comments/6 [19:32] Ubuntu bug 506717 in plymouth "[Lucid] plymouth does not display when using nvidia drivers" [High,New] [19:32] so it should be working with non-KMS. It just Isn't [19:45] its tring to load a second display on vt7 and plymouth only drops drm master on vt switch? [20:28] all this time and it just now hit me to put the intel package on hold and use everything else from edgers :D i've been slacking with the updates lately because I havent been able to use it in months [20:29] was syncing evdev with origin/ubuntu even though we're just syncing debian so I missed alot of fixes there [20:31] anyone here been able to use intel 2.10+ on 945 or under successfully? [20:31] i haven't even tried since you said it was broken :) [20:32] it's broken here and for at least 15 other people that I know are using edgers but I haven't asked if anyone was actually able to use it so I'd be interested to know :D [20:32] I'll put a note on edgers asking for feedback [20:33] i was away from my 945 from christmas until yesterday though. maybe i can try later. [20:34] * Duke` checks his driver version [20:35] pretty sure 965+ doesn't have the problem because I know alot of people using edgers with that that arent complaining and never seen any reporters that werent using 915 or 945 [20:36] I know you are having the problem as well on 945 with 2.9.99.902+ Duke` :D [20:36] you were the one that tipped me off that libdrm from 11-25 actually works [20:36] 2.10 [20:36] unfortunately I lost my 11-25 packages, I dunno how :( [20:36] you are using 2.10 now and not getting the errors? or have you been putting up with it for all this time? [20:37] I have the execbuf error EVERY day [20:37] I had it some hours ago [20:37] man you have some perserverence [20:37] every day I pray for the holy new version fixing it :D [20:38] you should just grab the 2.9.1 from lucid and rebuild it for karmic and put a hold on that package [20:39] change the xserver-xorg-dev (>= 2:1.7), line in debian/control to xserver-xorg-dev (>= 2:1.6), first [20:39] if I would like a stable version, I would just disable edgers for some time and use karmic packages [20:39] I feel that there is not a lot of activity around this bug at Intel. I hope I'm wrong [20:40] for sure I agree with you :D [20:43] it's incredibly frustrating with how its so random though, cant believe you've put up with it for almost 2 months [20:45] yeah [20:45] but someone must do the testing job ;-) [20:45] i wont be updating mesa on karmic anymore probably Duke` :( [20:45] ah? [20:46] well, I'll just like an upload when the fix is released [20:46] at least [20:46] it's changed so much in lucid we cant just use the scripts to update it, and i dont use karmic [20:46] oh [20:47] well lucid release is in 3 months, it's not too far ;p [21:26] btw, I've flagged the exec buf bug to Intel and identified it as a blocker bug that must be fixed before we move to 2.10 [21:26] however, they're blocked by need for additional debugging information [21:26] there is a debugging patch posted to the bug report, so it sounds like they just need someone to work with them on gathering the right data [21:27] unfortunately I don't have a 945 that I can do the testing on, and haven't reproduced the issue on !945