/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/01/21/#ubuntu-motu.txt

ramirohello00:20
ramirohow would I go about the following issue?: a cross-compiler depends on pre-compiled runtime libraries. with them, I build the compiler. then I can build the runtime libraries again. So the runtime libraries depend on themselves.00:22
RAOFThat sounds like a typical bootstrapping problem; I'd guess off the top of my head that gcc does that, and I'm fairly sure mono does, too.00:23
ramiroit is possible to build them in many steps, but then I'd have to bundle the runtime source with gcc and have a somewhat complex debian/rules.00:25
RAOFYou're bootstrapping; you're going to have a somewhat complex debian/rules *regardless*.00:26
ramiroheh, makes sense.00:27
RAOFYou can bundle binaries in the source package as long as they get rebuilt during the build - ie: patching some source and then rebuilding should Do The Right Thing™00:27
crimsunpoor chris.01:46
RAOFI wonder what's bouncing me.01:51
StevenKRAOF: "Excess Flood"01:51
RAOFThat seems odd, given I wasn't actually doing anything at all.01:52
StevenKIndeed01:52
RAOFPerhaps a bug against smuxi is in order.01:52
micahgRAOF: there was a huge netsplit a little while ago01:55
RAOFAh.  Maybe that triggers it?  Was that when I started bouncing?01:56
micahgRAOF: yes01:57
stochasticwhat's the program that's similar to 'apt-get source package' but instead pulls the latest code from launchpad?02:12
micahgstochastic: pull-lp-source02:13
stochasticthanks micahg02:13
dhillon-v10hi all, can anyone look here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cln/+bug/508995 and tell me why the patch I provided doesn't work?02:13
ubottuUbuntu bug 508995 in cln "Please merge cln (1.3.1-2) from Debian Testing" [Undecided,New]02:13
StevenKwgrant: O hai -- how long does it take qa.uw.com/ftbfs to notice something does now build?02:42
wgrantStevenK: It makes a *lot* of requests to Launchpad, so it only runs every six hours.02:43
wgrantThat frequency is arbitrary.02:43
StevenKwgrant: Yeah, sounds reasonable02:45
ajmitchwgrant: so the next step is to get some batching happening in the API?02:56
RAOFOh, poot.  I misspelled “Requires.private” as “Requires.Private”.03:12
hakaishiHey folks! Anyone up to advocate/review qt-shutdown-p? It is a small program to shutdown the computer. http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/qt-shutdown-p03:15
rhpot1991anyone know if there is a way to tell pbuilder-dist to save changes?  I can't seem to get the pbuilder --save-after-login flag to work with it03:50
crimsundepends on the type(s) of changes, but generally, --save-after-exec --override-config03:52
rhpot1991crimsun: I just need to add my ppa to my apt sources03:52
rhpot1991normally I'd login and do --save-after-login, add the ppa exit and all would be good03:53
rhpot1991but with pbuilder-dist it doesn't seem to honor that flag (or I'm doing something silly)03:53
RAOFIt does (or should) honour that flag, but it also overrides a bunch of your config with each invocation.  Say, for example, that you don't want mirror.kernel.org as your mirror?  Currently, you're out of luck with pbuilder-dist.03:55
RAOFThat might also cause it to kill your added entries in sources.list; I'm unsure.03:56
rhpot1991RAOF: well I used pbuilder and pointed at the resulting .tzr file and it seems to have saved it, but oddly enough when I logged in with pbuilder-dist it didn't show me the saved data03:59
rhpot1991I'll go ahead and build and see if it works03:59
rhpot1991I need my PPA to match a dependency that isn't pushed yet03:59
dhillon-v10crimsun: hi there, can you have a look here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cln/+bug/508995 if you have a minute or so04:03
ubottuUbuntu bug 508995 in cln "Please merge cln (1.3.1-2) from Debian Testing" [Undecided,New]04:03
dhillon-v10crimsun: why is the patch not applying? I did it using bzr04:05
micahgif something is marked won't fix, if it's released with a proper changelog entry, will the status change to Fix Released?04:14
rhpot1991RAOF: well, I went in with pbuilder added them, updated, everthing is ok.  Then I run pbuilder-dist and it doesn't seem to obey :(04:15
rhpot1991guess I'll have to go straight up pbuilder for now04:15
RAOFmicahg: You mean: there's a changelog entry * foo, bar: fixes (LP: #123456), where bug 123456 is currently set to “won't fix”?  I think that'll set it to fix released.04:16
ubottuLaunchpad bug 123456 in xine-lib "podcast crashes amarok" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/12345604:16
micahgRAOF: that's my question :)04:16
RAOFI'm fairly sure it'll set it to fixed released.  Do you not want it to?04:17
micahgRAOF: no, I want it to so I don't have to make more bug noise ;)04:17
ScottKmicahg: Although I have to wonder why something that's marked wontfix is getting fixed.04:18
micahgScottK: source package change04:19
ScottKGenerally we're pretty conservative about putting that on a bug.04:19
micahgfirefox 3.6 will return to the firefox source package which was formerly firefox 204:19
* micahg put it there in a lot of cases04:20
micahgit was correct at the time04:21
persiaIF it was correct at the time, why isn't it still correct?  "Won't Fix" should be reserved for stuff we really aren't expecting to fix.  Notabug and the like.04:33
=== micahg1 is now known as micahg
micahgpersia: it was firefox 2 which was won't fix, now it's firefox 3.6 which will be fix released04:38
micahgwe intended to stick with versioned source packages until upstream decided to do rapid releases04:38
persiaI still think it oughtn't have been won'tfix.  That should only be used where we specifically intend not to fix something.04:38
persiaGetting it fixed later, even by accident, makes us look indecisive.04:39
micahgpersia: so, you're saying I should comment anyways and explain?04:40
persiaLeaving a comment in the bug explaining why circumstances have changed would mak sense, and changing the bug from "wontfix" to "triaged" or something with the comment.04:40
persiaThen you go from "Triaged" to "Fix Released" with the upload.04:41
micahgpersia: ok, I'll do that, it's only 3 bugs in this case04:41
persiaBut try to avoid these :)04:41
micahgyep, it's unfortunate, but necessary04:41
ScottKpersia: Sometimes circumstances change and so wontfix should change too.05:26
persiaScottK: Agreed.  I just think that 1) it deserves explanation when it happens, and 2) we should try not to do that.05:27
ScottKCertainly.05:27
ScottKI'd rather look indecisive than make present virtue out of past necessity.05:28
persiaI'd rather avoid both, but given the choice I have to agree.05:30
dholbachgood morning07:11
SevenMachinesmorning07:12
=== ApOgEE__ is now known as ApOgEE
dholbachBlackZ: so does autotrash use a setup.py based installation?09:42
BlackZdholbach, yes09:42
dholbachyou could try just using /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny (with debhelper 7)09:43
dholbachDktrKranz: do you have a good example for an python app using dh7?09:43
POXdholbach: gaupol :)09:44
johe|workhi there, i submited an new package version to an bug report https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pysnmp4/+bug/509495 what does i nedd to do now, to get it replaced in repositry09:44
ubottuUbuntu bug 509495 in python-pysnmp4 "pysnmp version switch broken" [Undecided,New]09:44
dholbachthanks POX09:45
dholbachBlackZ: apt-get source --diff-only gaupol; less gaupol*.diff.gz09:45
dholbachBlackZ: that'll give you an idea how to do it09:45
BlackZdholbach, thx09:46
dholbachBlackZ: and if you get stuck, just ask in here, somebody will be able to help you :)09:46
POXdholbach: zless, I guess (and gaupol has to be >= 0.14-1)09:55
dholbachPOX: less works too09:55
POXnot here (I don't have LESSOPEN defined)09:58
dholbachPOX: ah ok10:02
randomactionjohe|work: you need to provide a debdiff (modification to the *source* package), and see https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess10:04
johe|workrandomaction, thx10:04
randomactionjohe|work: see also https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix (it tells you how to produce a debdiff)10:04
jariqCould someone please review package ipwatchd ? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/ipwatchd10:27
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
hyperairdholbach: ping. regarding the whole MC losing quorum thing, how should i go about applying as a MOTU, if i can't make the next meeting? (it's 3AM local time)12:30
persiahyperair: You could try an email application, but otherwise, you'd do best to wait until the 2nd February DMB meeting, at which we can hope some direction is provided.12:33
persiaNote that we haven't had any successful email applications in a while, and getting it complete in the next six days would be tricky.12:33
ScottKAlthernatively, suck it up and get up in the middle of the night ...12:35
* persia expects some MC members to be attending in the middle of the (local) night.12:36
DktrKranzdholbach: I finished my job journey and I'm back town, so I can regularly take my session tonight :)13:20
QuintasanHello13:47
slytherinQuintasan: hi13:48
Quintasanslytherin: \o13:48
slytherinWhy do we have two links pointing to different FTBFS pages in topic?13:48
ScottKBecause one if packages that failed to build in the archive and the other is ones that failed to build in a rebuild test.13:52
slytherinScottK: So is the second url relevant all the time?13:53
ScottKslytherin: Yes.  lucas has been doing regular rebuild tests for us this cycle.13:54
slytherinThen it is fine.13:54
=== dholbach_ is now known as dholbach
=== highvolt1ge is now known as highvoltage
ramiroI'm using reprepro to manage a repository. When I included a new version of a package, the old one was deleted because it was unreferenced. How do I make it so that all packages always remain in the repository, and it's the user's job to select which one he wants? (and by default he gets the latest version)15:33
nigel_nbmaco, around?15:55
persiaramiro: You'll need to either use less smart repository software, or very custom solution.15:55
ramirough, a less smart repository software means I'll have to be less dumb =). which one do you suggest?15:57
persiaI'm not the right person to suggest any: I don't manage repositories (but we don't much generally here).  apt-ftparchive is probably the least fancy of the options.15:57
freeflyingramiro: dak maybe :)16:06
persiafreeflying: Doesn't dak autoexpire superceded stuff?  Anyway, I can't imagine it being useful for less than 10,000 packages.16:09
ScottKpersia: Depends on the pain to package ratio you find acceptable.16:10
persiaheh.  I suppose :)16:10
freeflyingpersia: mini-dak then  :)16:11
dholbachajmitch_: if you have a bit of time - do you think you could help out with reviewing the zope* packages on REVU?16:16
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
ScottKConsidering there's an active Zope team in Debian, wouldn't they better go there?16:18
persiaThe moreso because they describe themselves as the "Debian/Ubuntu Zope Team"16:22
benste hi, if I'd like to have a package merged from debian - what can I do? -https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tiemu/+bug/22133216:28
ubottuUbuntu bug 221332 in tiemu "The tiemu package is heavily outdated" [Wishlist,Confirmed]16:28
benste?16:31
ScottKbenste: First step would be to look at the changes Ubuntu has from Debian in the package and see if they are still needed/relevant.16:31
persiabenste: There are outstanding Ubuntu changes that need to be investigated before the package is synched.16:31
persiabenste: From a quick glance, I believe it does need a merge, to deal with iceweasel/firefox differences between Debian and Ubuntu.16:32
benstewhy should tiemu use FF ?16:32
benste- where does i have to look for it ?16:32
persiabenste: In Debian, in tiemu 3.02-1, there is a dependency declared on "iceweasel | www-browser".16:33
bensteand whom does I have to propose to include the new version even if it's ok - so already build a ubuntu version16:33
benstek16:33
persiaThis dependency needs to be modified to be "firefox | www-browser"16:33
benstepersia: only changing depency is simple isn't it - simply download source, change config and rebuild deb right ?16:34
persiaErr, sorry.  Needs to be "firefox | abrowser | www-browser"16:34
benstewhat about the already build Ubuntu package16:34
persiabenste: Don't even bother rebuilding.  We work exclusively with source packages.16:34
bensteinlcuded in the PPA of one poster16:34
ScottKpersia: Why?16:35
benstepersia: changing depency is all - if so I'll do right away16:35
persiaDownload the Debian and Ubuntu package sources.  Merge the changelogs.  modify debian/control to have the right dependency and use "Ubuntu Developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com>" as the Maintainer.16:35
ScottKI think the odds of anyone having no package that provides www-browser installed is effectively nil16:35
persiaPut the previous maintainer in XSBC-Maintainer16:35
persiaUpdate the changelog, and attach a debdiff to the bug.16:36
benstepersia: would be kind of you to explain me how to do this - or give some simple resources which will guide me through this process16:36
persiaScottK: Because that's what the mozilla team declared should be the dependency.  See bug #27277216:36
ubottuLaunchpad bug 272772 in zekr "packages that Depend/Recommend/Suggest firefox (meta-package) must alternatively Depend/Recommend/Suggest abrowser" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/27277216:37
persia!merge16:37
ubottuhttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment/Merging16:37
persiabenste: That URL should give some guidance.  Ask here if you get stuck.16:37
ScottKpersia: since it currently Depends/Recommends neither, it's not applicable16:37
bensteI'll16:37
benstefo16:37
persiaScottK: Hrm?  Are you looking at the same tiemu I'm seeing?16:38
persiaDepends: libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.20.0), libc6 (>= 2.7), libcairo2 (>= 1.2.4), libfontconfig1 (>= 2.4.0), libfreetype6 (>= 2.3.5), libglade2-0 (>= 1:2.6.1), libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.16.0), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.14.1), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.21.6), libticables3 (>= 3.9.6-1), libticalcs4 (>= 4.6.1-1), libtifiles0 (>= 0.6.6-1), libxml2 (>= 2.6.27), zlib1g (>= 1:1.1.4), firefox | abrowser | www-browser16:38
ScottKpersia: I'm looking at you having said it depends iceweasel | www-browser16:38
persiaMy sid apt-cache says it does.  Am I out of date?16:39
ScottKNo.  I'm saying I think that's sufficient.16:39
persiaI thought that one of the changes we maintained was all the s/iceweasel/firefox/ changes in package relationships.16:39
persiaDo we have a solution for that now?16:39
ScottKChanging iceweasel | www-browser to firefox | abrowser | www-browser has zero practical effect on user experience16:39
ScottKThe only time that would matter is if the user had no package installed that provided www-browser and that would be hard to accomplish16:40
persiaWell, that removes a whole heap of diffs.16:40
ScottKI'm just saying I think it's not worth the effort to maintain that diff.16:40
ScottKIt does.16:40
ScottKConsider it.16:41
persiaI can see the argument, I just thought that there was some intent behind that.16:41
ScottKI realize it's a change in procedure, but I think it makes sense.16:41
ScottKIf there's some other diff, go ahead and do firefox | abrowser | www-browser too, but if that's it, I'd sync it.16:41
persiaI don't disagree, but I also think that procedure is best changed in combination with interested parties, such as TIL or mozillateam.16:41
persiafta: Do you have any opinion about tiemu and iceweasel/firefox ?16:42
persiaScottK: If there wasn't some reason to fiddle the names, the simplest solution to the entire mess would be to have firefox Provide: iceweasel.16:43
ScottKpersia: I agree with that.16:43
persiaSo, because we didn't do it the easy way, I presume there's some reason.16:43
ScottKThat would solve an even large set of problems.16:43
ScottKIn theory, changing to firefox | abrowser | www-browser is more correct, but I think it's not worth the trouble.16:44
persiaI don't pretend to understand that reason, but I'll go along as long as others feel it's better to do it the hard way.16:44
ScottKI don't know that it's been seriously examined in some time.16:45
persiaThat's why I asked TIL :)16:45
benstepersia: what if I can't find my package in https://merges.ubuntu.com/universe but in https://merges.ubuntu.com/t/tiemu/17:08
benste?17:08
persiabenste: then that would mean the wiki page was out of date :)17:09
benstelol17:09
benstepersia: the wiki(how to merge) or the list of merges ?17:09
persiaThe wiki of how to merge.17:09
bensteso you're using a different site today ?17:09
persia /topic says http://people.ubuntuwire.com/~lucas/merges.html , but this may be temporary.17:10
persiaWe've been having a lot of discussion about merges this cycle, and I'm not sure we have a final solution yet.17:10
bddebianHeya gang17:15
benstepersia: thx for this temp info found the last uploader and Scott  replied to the bug too17:16
ScottKpersia: His package is in Multiverse.  That's why he couldn't find it in Universe.17:19
benste:-917:19
ScottKInteresting.  Per architecture support time: "add case were a architecture is supported (armel) but not for the full LTS time" in https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-lucid-support-timeframe-information17:20
persiaScottK: Is MoM generally up again, or are we still unsure of a final solution?17:20
persiaScottK: Separately, that sense of "supported" probably means "labeled as supported", rather than anything else.  Same as hardy lpia in that sense.17:22
ScottKpersia: MoM is unmaintained.17:23
ScottKOh, I didn't realize that obtained for Hardy lpia.17:23
persiaThat was my understanding.  As a result, I believe the wiki page on merging to be out of date.17:23
ScottKOTOH, the alternative via bzr is not really mature enough for general use.17:23
persiaI'm not sure it does for all flavours, but I know that because of the way some of the mobile stuff was done on lpia, lpia desktop didn't work reliably anyway because of library issues.17:24
persiaSo when the (non-LTS) mobile flavour ended support (18 months), I *think* lpia kinda lost support.17:24
persiaI have no idea about lpia server.17:25
persiaOn merging: right.  I don't think we have a good replacement for the merging documentation right now.17:25
ScottKThere are some useful hint in the UDD wiki pages.17:27
ScottKhint/hints17:27
persiaYes.  They haven't worked for me yet, but I'm sure that's only a matter of time.17:27
ScottKAlso in the replies to my recent thread on the topic on the UDD mail list.17:28
ScottKIt would be useful for someone to work on a page that was the union of those two resources.17:28
fabrice_splutin, about bug 51069319:04
ubottuLaunchpad bug 510693 in ecore "Sync ecore 0.9.9.063-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51069319:04
fabrice_spwhy do you need an ack from u-u-s? IMHO you should be able to push that by yourself19:05
fabrice_sp(package is still in universe, it seems)19:06
Lutinfabrice_sp: heh, thought it had been promoted to main already.19:06
Lutinsorry19:06
fabrice_spnp: I'll unsubscribe u-u-s then ;-)19:07
fabrice_spmay I subscribe archive admin also? Or you will take care of it?19:08
Lutinfabrice_sp: I'll take care of it, thanks19:09
fabrice_spok19:09
=== gnomefreak76 is now known as gnomefreak
pucko-I have a few packaging problems I was hoping someone could help me with. I want to include a udev-file in my package (which is built with cdbs). but I can't get debhelper to add my udev rule to the package. Supposedly, specifying DEB_INSTALLUDEV_ARGS in debian/rules should take care of it. but it doesn't seen to work. it's just ignored.19:42
ftapersia, ScottK: wrt tiemu, feel free to do whatever you want with it, i just touched it once as part of a massive firefox meta package update19:42
persiafta: More generally, do you know the reason that we fuss with changing all the package dependencies rather than just having firefox and abrowser Provide: iceweasel?19:43
persiapucko-: Is this a new package, or a change to an existing package?19:43
pucko-a new package19:44
pucko-dh_installudev is actually run, but I can't get it to take the correct arguments.19:44
ftapersia, a lot of debian users are using our firefox packages (because they are fresher), as they also have iceweasel, it's best to keep things separate19:45
persiafta: So it's worth changing the dependencies of all these packages every cycle?  I just thought that by using Provides: we could sync more packages from Debian.19:46
ftapersia, but you may want to talk to asac about that, those days, i'm mostly focusing on chromium19:46
persiaOK.  I just picked on you because you touched tiemu last :)19:46
persiapucko-: You need DEB_DH_INSTALLUDEV_ARGS instead of  DEB_INSTALLUDEV_ARGS, but figuring this out is frustrating and tricky.  Might I recommend using /usr/share/doc/debhelper/examples/rules.tiny as the base of your debian/rules?19:47
pucko-oh. thanks!19:47
pucko-um.. that file is just 3 lines :-/19:49
persiaYep.  Saves lots of messing about.19:50
persiaYou can pass arguments to dh_installudev either by passing them to the dh call (but this passes the same arguments (likely usually ignored) to dh_*), or you can add an override_dh_installudev: rule, and put the complete dh_installudev call in that.19:52
persia(Well, there's lots of other ways to do it too, but those might be easiest)19:52
pucko-sounds easier to just use the env variable. now that I know it :-)19:52
persiaWhat's your environment variable setting?19:53
pucko-I mean that DEB_DH... thing19:53
persiaRight.  What value are you using?19:53
pucko-oh it worked. DEB_DH_INSTALLDEV_ARGS = --priority=8519:54
=== mrpouit is now known as mr_pouit
persiapucko-: Here's the two different rules.tiny debian/rules files that do that: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360227/19:55
persia(and no hunting around for special secret variable names)19:55
pucko-now I only have this postinst-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig warning. it is added by debhelper for some reason. can I tell it to ignore it?19:55
persiaAre you installing any shared libraries?19:55
pucko-well. sort of. it's a smart card reader driver. one .so-file that should go into /usr/lib/pcsc/ somewhere.19:56
pucko-so tha path shouldn't be added to ld.so.conf19:57
pucko-the19:57
persiaYou need to pass arguments to dh_makeshlibs to ignore that.19:57
pucko-ok.19:57
=== ajmitch_ is now known as ajmitch
=== arand__ is now known as arand
feulorenhi, is there packages for gegl 0.1 somewhere ?20:16
randomactionfeuloren: looks like no, Debian has an open request for it20:18
statikhey Daviey, i just reviewed your django-openid-auth branch. got one minor request for you, and i'll be happy to merge it20:35
hotellinahi people, do you know how make ubuntu able to show volume levels for all sound peripherals ( usb also) ?20:50
jibelfabrice_sp, just seen you've sponsored bug 464422. Thank you !21:03
ubottuLaunchpad bug 464422 in msttcorefonts "package ttf-mscorefonts-installer 3.0 failed to install/upgrade" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/46442221:03
fabrice_spjibel, you're welcome: you did all the job ;-)21:04
randomactionjibel: well done, this was a bug with an enormous amount of duplicates21:09
jibelrandomaction, thanks21:10
randomactiontwo such bugs, actually :)21:11
jibelif anyone knows how to reach the debian maintainer please ping him. It would be great to fix it upstream too.21:12
fabrice_spjibel, I saw you reported it there, but no answer :-/21:13
menesiscould someone review/sponsor my zope.* packages on REVU? http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/u/menesis21:28
pucko-can anyone tell me why there is both a libusb-0.1-4 and libusb-1.0-0? very confusing..21:32
pucko-in ubuntu karmic21:33
randomactionpucko-: it's commonplace to have different versions of libraries in distribution (or installed on the same machine), as different applications may require different versions21:36
pucko-hm..21:37
pucko-it seems very specific. why not just libusb0 and libusb1?21:40
tsimpsonbecause the files are libusb-0.1.so.4 and libusb-1.0.so.021:44
* Quintasan goes to bed, school etc.21:45
jariqhow long does it take to the package to show up in the ppa after upload?22:05
persiajariq: ask in #launchpad.22:06
jariqthx22:06
hggdhabout 5 minutes, anyway22:32
superm1RainCT, could you ack ~ubuntu-dev-without-bugmail into ~mythbuntu?23:49
RainCTsuperm1: sure23:50
superm1thanks23:50
RainCTsuperm1: Uhm, what has changed since the original proposal when we created that team?23:52
superm1RainCT, it looks like there is a gateway to catch all the extraneous email now isn't there?23:52
superm1or was there still some other deficiency?23:53
RainCTsuperm1: I'm not sure, I'm reading the old mails right now23:53
RainCTsuperm1: There was no agreement that ubuntu-dev needed access to such branches: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2008-August/026207.html23:56
RainCTsuperm1: Also, problems with the ~ubuntu-dev-without-bugmail approach were that e-mails other than bugmail were still send to everyone (for example, notifications of new mailing list creations) and that all developers had the Mythbuntu logo on their profile23:57
superm1Oh right23:57
superm1well then i guess not worth the troubles still23:57
superm1once more ~mythbuntu folks are more packaging proficient on their own should just have them apply for per package upload rights and move those branches to ~mythbuntu-dev at that time23:58
superm1for now it's convenient as it stands23:58
superm1sorry for the churn, i should have dug that mail up myself and reviewed it23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!