=== bjf is now known as bjf-afk | ||
=== asac_ is now known as asac | ||
asac | moin moin | 08:10 |
---|---|---|
ogra | yawn yawn | 08:38 |
cooloney_ | asac: ogra morning guys | 08:39 |
=== cooloney_ is now known as cooloney | ||
ogra | cooloney, hey, thanks for poking the NIC issue :) | 08:40 |
asac | dmart: there? | 08:40 |
asac | hi cooloney | 08:40 |
cooloney | ogra: no problem, i got no clue about that, so asked for help. heh | 08:42 |
ogra | gah, seems i dont het uboot off my back today ... | 08:43 |
ogra | *get | 08:43 |
ogra | asac, no go for the NIC fix | 09:34 |
asac | huh? | 09:54 |
asac | ogra: thought you ignore that until we get input from fsl | 09:54 |
ogra | asac, FSL attached a patch to bug 507887# | 10:19 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 507887 in uboot-imx "NIC not properly initialized in uboot code" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/507887 | 10:19 |
ogra | but seems its only half the fix | 10:20 |
asac | ogra: cool. and not ;) | 10:26 |
ogra | right | 10:26 |
ogra | there were 3 patches overall attached to three bugs | 10:26 |
ogra | sadly none for the MMC issue and all of them against 2009.08 | 10:26 |
ogra | so nothing that helps us | 10:27 |
ogra | the L2 fix looks intresting though | 10:27 |
asac | the NIC patch looks simple enough | 10:27 |
asac | to check if it would work on .01 | 10:27 |
asac | where is the L2 patch attached? | 10:27 |
ogra | 10:28 | |
ogra | the NIC patch doesnt work | 10:28 |
ogra | as i said above (and in teh bug), we seem to miss the actual patch that implements the function | 10:28 |
asac | heh. can you reply in bug and to mail? | 10:29 |
ogra | i did | 10:29 |
ogra | well, not by mail though | 10:29 |
asac | kk | 10:30 |
ogra | see commants 3,4 and 5 on bug 507887 | 10:30 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 507887 in uboot-imx "NIC not properly initialized in uboot code" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/507887 | 10:30 |
=== dmart is now known as Guest46463 | ||
=== Guest46463 is now known as dmart | ||
ogra | fsck from util-linux-ng 2.16 | 13:48 |
ogra | e2fsck 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009) | 13:48 |
ogra | /dev/sda6: clean, 146136/2321984 files, 948823/9277521 blocks (check deferred; on battery) | 13:48 |
* ogra pokes his babbage with a pointy stick ... | 13:49 | |
ogra | you got no battery you darn thing !!! | 13:49 |
ogra | ogra@babbage2:~$ sudo cat /proc/apm | 13:51 |
ogra | 1.13 1.2 0x02 0xff 0xff 0xff -1% -1 ? | 13:51 |
ogra | mumble | 13:51 |
asac | bug 456659 | 14:24 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 456659 in linux-fsl-imx51 "suspend/resume failure on imx51" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/456659 | 14:24 |
asac | bug 488267 | 14:25 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 488267 in ffmpeg "ffmpeg should be built with -marm for lucid on armel" [Low,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/488267 | 14:25 |
=== bjf-afk is now known as bjf | ||
ogra | cooloney, do you know if the FSL kernel patches change anything wrt /proc/apm output ? | 15:16 |
asac | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MobileTeam/ReleaseStatus/Lucid | 15:28 |
asac | ogra: plars: GrueMaster: persia: dyfet: ^^ | 15:28 |
ogra | asac, i think the fact that we have an outdated uboot is also RC (if RC means release critical :) ) | 15:29 |
ogra | i.e. i doubt we'll ever get a fix for the MMC issues for 2009.01 ... so i think they should still be on release team radar | 15:30 |
ogra | (which in turn enforces us to update to .08) | 15:30 |
asac | ogra: well. thats covered | 15:30 |
asac | or do we have a bug for that? | 15:31 |
asac | imo its well covered by the other two problems | 15:31 |
asac | which reminds me that i should RC the other bug if its not yet | 15:31 |
ogra | we have a bug for the MMC issue | 15:31 |
ogra | not for "hey we chose an old version" :) | 15:31 |
asac | ogra: can you target for lucid + milestone alpha-3 | 15:31 |
asac | and gimme bug id ;) | 15:31 |
* ogra digs | 15:31 | |
ogra | Bug 506761 | 15:32 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 506761 in uboot-imx "lucid uboot hangs on fatload uImage on fsl TO2 TO2.5 and TO3" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/506761 | 15:32 |
asac | thx | 15:32 |
asac | ogra: why is that wontfix for lucid? | 15:33 |
asac | that demotes that to non-RC ;) | 15:33 |
ogra | uh | 15:33 |
* asac changes that | 15:33 | |
asac | also its medium ;) | 15:33 |
asac | thats overly polite -> critical now | 15:33 |
ogra | you did set the Wontfix :P | 15:34 |
ogra | and the Medium :) | 15:34 |
asac | really? | 15:34 |
asac | ouch | 15:34 |
asac | oh... maybe when i thought that the paritioning was good enough | 15:34 |
ogra | right | 15:34 |
ogra | right after the commant about partitioning | 15:34 |
asac | ogra: the version revision thing is not RC? | 15:35 |
ogra | because it "doesnt block release" | 15:35 |
ogra | not for now imho | 15:35 |
asac | dyfet: did busybox -marm work? | 15:35 |
ogra | as long as FSL stands to their promises and we get a fixed release | 15:35 |
asac | yeah | 15:35 |
asac | ok | 15:35 |
dyfet | asac: yes | 15:36 |
ogra | asac, i'm about to upload busybox | 15:36 |
dyfet | asac: already posted for sponsor | 15:36 |
ogra | Bug 511197 | 15:36 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 511197 in busybox "fails to build on arm lucid (thumb2)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511197 | 15:36 |
asac | dyfet: where? | 15:36 |
ogra | got that in my queue ... | 15:36 |
asac | ah in the bug | 15:36 |
asac | just ping me here ;) | 15:36 |
ogra | just didnt get to it yet | 15:36 |
asac | i read bugmail at most twice a decade :-P | 15:36 |
asac | lol | 15:36 |
ogra | asac, dont worry, i need some sponsoring points anyway ;) | 15:37 |
ogra | asac, did you talk with doko about Bug 417009 (shipping the jaunty libgcc_uno.so | 15:38 |
ogra | ) | 15:38 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 417009 in openoffice.org "all openoffice apps die in 'com::sun::star::ucb::InteractiveAugmentedIOException' on armel in karmic" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/417009 | 15:38 |
ogra | its still "confirmed" so i assume we still ship the hack | 15:39 |
ogra | asac, if you want the hack gone that should be on our list | 15:40 |
asac | ogra: talked to doko about this today | 15:43 |
ogra | ah, good | 15:43 |
ogra | does he see a chance to get that fixed ? | 15:43 |
asac | he said its not RC if we ensure that we build it again from fresh sources | 15:43 |
asac | aka the lib | 15:43 |
ogra | well, we still ship old crap :) | 15:44 |
asac | not RC because the fix is so unlikely, that it doesnt make sense to stirr up release team | 15:44 |
ogra | ok | 15:44 |
asac | plars: so after talking to doko about python dove killage, he mentioned that python wasnt even build in lucid yet, so maybe the python2.6 package that is building right now, will help | 15:44 |
ogra | fsck from util-linux-ng 2.16 | 15:50 |
ogra | e2fsck 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009) | 15:50 |
ogra | /dev/sda6 has been mounted 40 times without being checked, check forced. | 15:50 |
ogra | Pass 1: Checking inodes, blocks, and sizes | 15:50 |
ogra | GEEZ !!!! | 15:50 |
ogra | i only added a printf ! | 15:50 |
ogra | why the heck does it not think its on battery anymore °! | 15:50 |
* ogra reboots again | 15:51 | |
asac | ogra: wrong negation? feels ok if it doesnt think its on battery ;) | 15:52 |
asac | unless you have a battery :-P | 15:52 |
asac | oh | 15:52 |
* asac should read more backlog | 15:52 | |
asac | good | 15:52 |
ogra | well, you saw the code before | 15:52 |
asac | ogra: do you get a warning during build? | 15:52 |
asac | like missing prototype? | 15:52 |
ogra | i just added a printf to print out the value of the ac | 15:52 |
ogra | nope | 15:52 |
asac | so stdio is probably included ;)= | 15:52 |
asac | ? | 15:52 |
asac | ok | 15:52 |
ogra | lets see, probably it was actually an enforced check because 40 mounts were done | 15:53 |
asac | does it build with all warnings? | 15:53 |
asac | maybe | 15:53 |
ogra | mountall: Could not connect to Plymouth | 15:53 |
ogra | fsck from util-linux-ng 2.16 | 15:53 |
ogra | e2fsck 1.41.9 (22-Aug-2009) | 15:53 |
ogra | /dev/sda6: clean, 146112/2321984 files, 949695/9277521 blocks | 15:53 |
ogra | init: plymouth-log main process (3168) terminated with status 111 | 15:53 |
ogra | hmm, it really doesnt see the battery anymore | 15:53 |
ogra | now thats weird | 15:53 |
ogra | if (fscanf(f, "%s %s %s %x", tmp, tmp, tmp, &acflag) != 4) | 15:55 |
ogra | acflag = 1; | 15:55 |
ogra | is the original code | 15:55 |
ogra | if (fscanf(f, "%s %s %s %x", tmp, tmp, tmp, &acflag) != 4) | 15:56 |
ogra | printf("acflag is: %x", acflag); | 15:56 |
ogra | acflag = 1; | 15:56 |
ogra | is what i made out of it | 15:56 |
ogra | it doesnt exec the printf ... nor does it set acflag | 15:56 |
plars | asac: cool, will give it a try | 16:23 |
asac | uff | 16:48 |
asac | so next week i want a better meeting | 16:48 |
asac | ;) | 16:48 |
asac | more success to report | 16:48 |
asac | please make that happen :) | 16:48 |
ogra | heh | 16:48 |
ogra | at least you didnt have to report many disasters :) | 16:49 |
asac | ogra: when did pitti send that announce? | 16:56 |
asac | was that in a thread? | 16:56 |
asac | i cant even find it ;) | 16:56 |
ogra | you mean the moving of people from rookery to a new machine ? | 16:56 |
asac | no. the moving of the work itesm from macaroni to people ;) | 16:56 |
asac | http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-mobile.html | 16:57 |
asac | vs | 16:57 |
asac | http://macaroni.canonical.com/~pitti/workitems/canonical-mobile.html | 16:57 |
ogra | hmm | 16:57 |
ogra | asac, ubuntu-platform@ | 16:58 |
asac | ogra: right. but was that standalone mail or a reply to an existing thread? | 16:58 |
ogra | 20.01.2010 14:25:05 | 16:58 |
ogra | standalone | 16:58 |
asac | i have all that in my main inbox | 16:58 |
ogra | with a big ANNOUNCE tag | 16:59 |
asac | ok i dont have it ;) | 16:59 |
ogra | look for ANNOUNCE in the subject | 16:59 |
asac | guess it was killed in a my eager zero inbox effort ;) | 16:59 |
ogra | heh | 16:59 |
ogra | hmm, so powertop seems to miss some kernel options on imx51 | 17:01 |
=== fta_ is now known as fta | ||
armin76 | asac: what about snapdragon? :) | 17:58 |
asac | fta: i will demote the ffmpeg depends for this upload ... so its not rejected because depends arent fulfillable | 18:01 |
asac | we can put that back when its in | 18:01 |
fta | asac, /me sad. why not use !armel instead? | 18:02 |
asac | fta: we have it on armel. just not in the archive | 18:02 |
asac | its not because of armel ... just because of archive | 18:02 |
asac | i dont want to block the chromium upload on first getting the other stuff up | 18:03 |
fta | why is it rejected in the 1st place? | 18:03 |
asac | if its not fulfillable | 18:03 |
asac | then it cant go in | 18:03 |
asac | all depends need to be there | 18:03 |
asac | so its recommends now. | 18:03 |
asac | you can drive the ffmpeg als in | 18:03 |
fta | why not submit it first? | 18:03 |
asac | its just licensing for that | 18:03 |
asac | because i dont want to wait any longer | 18:03 |
fta | *sigh* ok | 18:03 |
asac | you could have uploaded it ;) | 18:03 |
asac | would be great if you could do. | 18:04 |
armin76 | asac: chromium now fails for me :P | 18:19 |
armin76 | export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/var/tmp/portage/www-client/chromium-9999/work/chromium-9999/out/Release/lib.host:/var/tmp/portage/www-client/chromium-9999/work/chromium-9999/out/Release/lib.target:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH; cd v8/tools/gyp; mkdir -p /var/tmp/portage/www-client/chromium-9999/work/chromium-9999/out/Release/obj.target/geni; "/var/tmp/portage/www-client/chromium-9999/work/chromium-9999/out/Release/mksnapshot" "/var/tmp/portage/www-client/chrom | 18:19 |
armin76 | ium-9999/work/chromium-9999/out/Release/obj.target/geni/snapshot.cc" | 18:19 |
armin76 | pure virtual method called | 18:19 |
armin76 | terminate called without an active exception | 18:19 |
armin76 | what was that error about? | 18:22 |
armin76 | and i'm using gcc-4.3 | 18:23 |
asac | that was about -fno-strict-alias breakage for ggc 4.3 | 18:35 |
asac | if you are really sure everything uses gcc 4.3 on your system now then i dont know | 18:35 |
asac | but i would expect it doesnt | 18:35 |
asac | you can try -fno-tree-sink | 18:35 |
asac | grab the patch from our packaging .head | 18:36 |
asac | no_tree_sink_v8.patch | 18:36 |
* asac out | 18:36 | |
armin76 | well, but the -fno-tree-sink is used only if gcc_version=44 | 18:38 |
armin76 | and it worked before, i'm wondering if you now need gcc-4.4 :P | 18:38 |
plars | new python didn't help btw | 19:32 |
asac | damn | 20:47 |
asac | plars: there? | 20:47 |
asac | plars: so you basically can go to console, and make the board hang by running import pybootchargui right? | 20:48 |
plars | asac: yes | 20:48 |
plars | asac: right, that one and uno both seem to do it so far. Haven't found others yet | 20:48 |
asac | plars: so idea is to run python -v | 20:48 |
asac | that should spit out the modules that get implicitly imported | 20:49 |
asac | if you | tee that to a file you might be able to try each of those until you find which import causes this | 20:49 |
plars | ah, neat, didn't know about that | 20:49 |
asac | right | 20:49 |
plars | ok, the last thing I see it trying to import was cStringIO | 20:50 |
plars | need to reboot, sec | 20:50 |
asac | yeah | 20:50 |
asac | so check if that alone causes it ;) | 20:50 |
asac | then we can check what it does etc. | 20:50 |
asac | also ... did you find any module you could import without a hang? | 20:50 |
plars | asac: yes, plenty. These had been the only two so far that I found that caused it to hang | 20:51 |
asac | cat ./Modules/cStringIO.c | pastebinit | 20:52 |
asac | http://pastebin.com/f51e45d28 | 20:52 |
plars | cStringIO imports ok, must be something after that | 20:52 |
asac | plars: so we dont see the module that fails to import? | 20:53 |
asac | e.g. it hangs before the dump? | 20:54 |
plars | asac: correct | 20:54 |
asac | plars: can you paste the current import list? | 20:54 |
plars | asac: I don't think it's an import from there... | 20:56 |
plars | asac: importing socket gives me the same impot list with python -v, and that's the last thing that this module imports | 20:56 |
asac | from where? | 20:57 |
asac | let me check something | 20:58 |
plars | asac: I'm still looking at uno | 20:58 |
asac | ah | 20:59 |
asac | http://paste.ubuntu.com/360871/ | 20:59 |
asac | thats import uno on x86 | 21:00 |
asac | >>> import pybootchartgui | 21:00 |
asac | import pybootchartgui # directory /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pybootchartgui | 21:00 |
asac | # /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pybootchartgui/__init__.pyc matches /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pybootchartgui/__init__.py | 21:00 |
asac | import pybootchartgui # precompiled from /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pybootchartgui/__init__.pyc | 21:00 |
asac | thats the thing i get for bootchart | 21:00 |
asac | so its not that easy :( | 21:00 |
asac | plars: do you know about other modules that cause this hang? | 21:08 |
plars | asac: those are the only two I've found so far | 21:09 |
asac | # pybootchartgui/__init__.pyc has bad magic | 21:10 |
asac | what does that mean? | 21:10 |
asac | plars: maybe removing the precompiled bits helps? sudo rm /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/pybootchartgui/*.pyc | 21:13 |
asac | sorry... just trying random things | 21:13 |
asac | >>> import pybootchartgui | 21:18 |
asac | import pybootchartgui # directory pybootchartgui | 21:18 |
asac | # pybootchartgui/__init__.pyc has bad magic | 21:18 |
asac | import pybootchartgui # from pybootchartgui/__init__.py | 21:18 |
asac | # wrote pybootchartgui/__init__.pyc | 21:18 |
asac | ah ... now i see where its coming from. | 21:18 |
asac | the package ships an old __init__.pyc here: | 21:18 |
asac | /usr/share/python-support/pybootchartgui/pybootchartgui/__init__.pyc | 21:18 |
asac | remove that ;) | 21:18 |
plars | asac: interesting | 21:19 |
plars | I don't have that file | 21:19 |
plars | and I don't see any .pyc file in the dpkg -L list | 21:20 |
asac | odd | 21:20 |
asac | dpkg -L pybootchartgui | grep pyc$ | 21:20 |
asac | /usr/share/python-support/pybootchartgui/pybootchartgui/__init__.pyc | 21:20 |
asac | well. its karmic | 21:20 |
plars | however after the earlier rm, I seem to be able to run pybootchartgui | 21:20 |
asac | so its probably clean ;) | 21:20 |
asac | cool ;) | 21:20 |
plars | so maybe... but what about uno? | 21:20 |
plars | and where did some stray .pyc come from? this was a new install | 21:21 |
asac | plars: have you tried to reinstall pybootchargui after python upgrade? | 21:21 |
asac | maybe give that a try | 21:21 |
plars | no | 21:21 |
asac | maybe it needs just fresh .pyc | 21:21 |
asac | the other directory i asked you to clean is generated during install | 21:21 |
asac | by python-central or something | 21:21 |
asac | not sure if tere are triggers that recreate all .pyc if python is updated though | 21:22 |
asac | to be sure check if reinstalling still keeps pybootchartgui working | 21:22 |
plars | also... | 21:22 |
plars | sudo rm /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/uno.pyc | 21:22 |
plars | import uno still hangs | 21:22 |
asac | plars: uno is something different. thats ooo | 21:23 |
asac | thats a different beast | 21:24 |
plars | asac: right, but symptom is the same | 21:24 |
asac | yes | 21:24 |
asac | plars: so does reinstalling pybootchartgui make keep it working? | 21:24 |
asac | ;) | 21:24 |
plars | asac: have to wait for the reboot | 21:24 |
plars | I hung it again trying uno | 21:24 |
asac | ah ok | 21:25 |
* asac checks something | 21:26 | |
plars | asac: pybootchartgui seems to be working now | 21:27 |
asac | very good | 21:28 |
asac | plars: have you tried to remove /usr/lib/python2.6/socket.pyc as well? | 21:30 |
plars | asac: no, but importing socket seemd ok | 21:30 |
plars | asac: no help | 21:30 |
asac | ok. | 21:30 |
asac | so i somehow dont get rid of the thought that the uno issue has something to do with the | 21:31 |
asac | uno thin we have in OOO | 21:31 |
asac | e.g. the bug that requires us to ship the jaunty so | 21:31 |
asac | i am not sure if that is pyuno.so though | 21:31 |
asac | do you remember? | 21:31 |
plars | asac: no idea, sorry | 21:31 |
asac | the bug about this was https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/436617 | 21:31 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 436617 in binutils "ARM unwind table linker processing broke OO's uno2cpp" [High,Confirmed] | 21:32 |
plars | will be interesting to boot the next livecd if it has the new python in it and see if it works | 21:32 |
asac | let me poke chris | 21:32 |
asac | plars: so ... pyuno.so pulls in that ugly jaunty libgcc3_uno.so | 21:38 |
asac | through libpyuno.so | 21:38 |
asac | somehow | 21:39 |
asac | guess thats not build with thumb2 | 21:39 |
plars | I see | 21:39 |
plars | I'm afraid that all of this may be hit or miss until x0 | 21:39 |
plars | from the sounds of things, this all likely relates back to that | 21:40 |
asac | the gcc3_uno.so thing probably yes. | 21:40 |
asac | plars: anyway, so with just removing pyuno we get a booting desktop now? | 21:44 |
asac | plars: if thats the case thats all we can hope for ;) | 21:44 |
asac | and we should consider to just do it to get working images until we get X0 to test | 21:44 |
plars | asac: oh, pyuno was never preventing it from booting, just happened to be another pythong module I noticed that caused trouble. Previously I was able to get it booting by taking pybootchartgui out of the init | 21:44 |
plars | asac: so no reason to remove uno | 21:45 |
asac | plars: cool. so basically with a reinstalled bootchart it works? | 21:45 |
plars | asac: seems to be, tomorrows image will be good to double-check with | 21:45 |
asac | guess we have flaky but working images tomorrow with some luck then ;) | 21:45 |
asac | plars: great. with that you can go and do more positive stuff until we get news on hardware/kernel front i guess. thanks a lot!!! | 21:46 |
plars | asac: thanks for all your help! | 21:46 |
asac | no thanks to you ... at least i can somehow sleep again ;) | 21:48 |
asac | the good I get out of this is that if we have everything recompiled the Y1 boards might become more and more stable ;) | 21:48 |
plars | asac: I didn't think you ever slept! | 21:53 |
asac | its those things i tell you :-P | 21:53 |
asac | actually i skip the timezone lag for sprints this way | 21:54 |
asac | i just keep my live going in central US time ;) | 21:54 |
asac | anti-jetlag method its called | 21:54 |
plars | heh | 21:55 |
asac | persia: http://pastebin.com/f429b20ae ... anything else you would like to see there? | 23:19 |
persia | asac: From policy 4.1.4, missing bits include: | 23:23 |
persia | 1. how to generate the fully patched source, in a form ready for editing, that would be built to create Debian packages. | 23:24 |
persia | (most people do this with debian/rules patch, which might work for your CDBS mess) | 23:24 |
persia | 3. Remove source modifications that are currently being applied when building the package | 23:25 |
persia | This might just be telling someone to unroll the tarball, but I'm not sure. | 23:25 |
persia | You've hit #2 and #4 well, and added lots of other interesting stuff :) | 23:26 |
asac | persia: 1. is covered in patching | 23:30 |
asac | section | 23:30 |
asac | imo | 23:30 |
asac | and 3. sounds odd ;) | 23:30 |
asac | not sure what that means | 23:30 |
asac | some patches are feature patches, some are needed to build (or at least there might be patches) | 23:30 |
asac | i dont think anyone can ask for keeping those separately documented ;) | 23:31 |
asac | for me patching section also tells 3. | 23:31 |
persia | asac: You7re supposed to provide a step-by-step guide, not say "start a local build and break in" :) | 23:31 |
asac | yeah. thats bad ;) but debian/rules patch is broken :-P | 23:31 |
asac | the joy of cdbs | 23:31 |
persia | I've always interpretedf "remove source modifications" as being both classes of packages. Someone who does silly things gets to keep both parts. | 23:31 |
asac | anyway, for a reasonably educated guy this shouldnt be a problem ;) | 23:32 |
persia | You know, lots of people don't use CDBS anymore :) | 23:32 |
asac | right. but kick off a local build is quite generic ;) | 23:32 |
asac | you can even use the instructions in the section above ;) | 23:32 |
asac | good. i think all is fine. thanks! | 23:32 |
persia | Well, but it's also a non-ideal way to do it, because you have to break it. | 23:32 |
asac | thats a bug | 23:33 |
asac | debian/rules patch should just work, but last time i checked it didnt | 23:33 |
persia | There's probably a CDBS rule like secret-internal-quilt-patched-but-not-built-but-you-don't-know-the-rule-name: rule that one could call. | 23:33 |
asac | heh. we tried a bit | 23:33 |
asac | its a bug in the tarball.mk i think | 23:33 |
persia | Oh. Ugh. | 23:33 |
asac | we have that in firefox etc. | 23:33 |
persia | Did I mention that tarball-in-tarball is ugly too :) | 23:34 |
asac | but let me assure oyu its not a practical problem | 23:34 |
asac | you want to edit and then usually continue build anyway ... | 23:34 |
asac | yes, but without tarball in tarball you dont want to build the sources regularly | 23:34 |
persia | Anyway, your README.source is massively better than not having one at all, especially for such a confusing package using a strange special private CDBS derivative. | 23:34 |
asac | heh | 23:34 |
persia | I understand the problem, I just think the solution is more RAM :) | 23:35 |
asac | so with enough ram, even cdbs-edit-patch would be great experience ;) | 23:42 |
persia | Well, not as bad, assuming the content was fully cached or one is operating on a tmpfs | 23:43 |
persia | I'd probably still use quilt, but that's just because I've come to not like digging through CDBS when I wanted to figure out how to do something. dh(1) makes my life easier. | 23:44 |
asac | aha | 23:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!