[00:56] yofel: re bug 306166 - looks like the OP had the issue in 8.10 & now they don't in 9.04 [00:56] Launchpad bug 306166 in network-manager-applet "nm-applet get incorrect netmask from DHCPD [openvpn]" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/306166 [01:24] anyone know is FF3.6 is planned for lucid? [01:35] which room do I go to to discuss a possible security issue? [01:37] WeatherGod: #ubuntu-hardened is probably best. what's up? [01:38] cjohnston: yes [01:38] thanks micahg [01:38] well, it isn't a huge security issue, but it could be done better [01:38] * micahg doesn't know of another upstream piece of software that people jump on teh day of release [01:39] micahg: oh, hi! asac said you were likely to pull in my PIE changes for firefox-3.6.head, is that right? [01:39] kees: yep, when I get home, I'm still bound to $WORK at the moment [01:40] micahg: oh! okay, nevermind me then. :) [01:40] kees: if you don't see it merged by midnight feel free to poke again :) [01:40] micahg: heh, okay. and if you run into any glitches with it, ping me. I strongly suspect it will be fine, but I did only do testing on ff3.5 [01:41] k === asac_ is now known as asac [04:18] hello [04:18] hi [04:22] could use Triaged status [04:22] Launchpad bug 450971 in network-manager-applet "Need mnemonic for buttons" [Undecided,Confirmed] [04:29] should knetworkmanager bugs be filed directly to kde? [04:29] Wolfcastle: if the bugs aren't related to the ubuntu packaging or major, yes [04:30] ok thanx [04:40] micahg, think you could mark my bug 478962 as triaged [04:40] Launchpad bug 478962 in rhythmbox "[karmic] Audio CDs do not play in rhythmbox after upgrade" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/478962 [04:40] (yes, the epic one) [04:41] turns out it was as simple as just install "Banshee" [04:42] WeatherGod: done, are you upstreaming? [04:43] I want to investigate a little more to figure out why Rhythmbox isn't finding the CD [04:43] still not 100% certain if Rhythmbox is incapable of detecting the CD, or if it is user error [04:44] WeatherGod: have you checked upstream for a bug? [04:44] no, not yet [04:44] now that I know it is rhythmbox (I originally thought it was a problem with gnome), I will go looking [04:45] want me to do that first before triaging? [04:48] WeatherGod: well, you had me mark triaged, so that should mean confirmed issue ready for developer [04:48] cyan-spam: done [04:48] which means it might be upstream [04:49] thanks hggdh [04:49] well, the report itself is complete [04:50] the exact cause is still the mystery, though [04:51] it is ready for a developer, in that sense [04:52] I gotta run... I will look for upstream tomorrow morning [04:53] is it just me or is gitweb's interface really annoying? how can you find the history of a specific file? [04:55] you can git clone & then git cola for an easier view [04:55] gitweb is a bit more limited [04:55] yeah... thanks. [07:42] kees: do you mind if i mark bug #511052 as a dupe of bug #511014? [07:43] Launchpad bug 511052 in wine1.2 "uninstallable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511052 [07:43] Launchpad bug 511014 in wine1.2 "package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511014 [07:43] it appears to be the same issue [07:45] kermiac: they're separate issues [07:45] kermiac: 511014 is because the debconf files were not installed but the postinst needs them [07:45] ok, thanks kees. that's why i thought I'd ask first [07:45] kermiac: 511052 is that the wine version conflicts are for the wrong versions. [07:46] kermiac: cool [07:46] kermiac: I'm actually uploading a fix for both of those and another problem now. [07:46] kees: awesome :) [07:52] can someone pls mark bug #511014 as triaged? [07:52] Launchpad bug 511014 in wine1.2 "package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511014 [07:55] kermiac: sure thing [07:55] kees: thanks === deegee_1 is now known as deegee [08:57] yawn o/ [08:58] hey BUGabundo_remote morning :) [12:10] bug 511014, when will this hit the repos? [12:10] Launchpad bug 511014 in wine1.2 "package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511014 [12:14] xteejx: When it's done building: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/1.1.36-0ubuntu3 [12:14] jpds: Oh right, is that done automatically? How long does it normally take out of interest? [12:16] Varies, clicking on the arches will tell you what LP thinks. [12:17] firefox 3.6 in alpha 3? [12:17] jpds: 2 hours, ok thanks, just wondered - trying to confirm a bug report :) [12:19] <^arky^> hi all [12:19] <^arky^> need help patching this bug 507964 [12:19] Launchpad bug 507964 in compiz "Application Switcher keybinds conflicts with gnome default" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/507964 [12:26] ikt: transition is just occuring in the archive as we speak [12:27] ikt: shouold be done by next week [12:27] BUGabundo_remote: nice! === BUGabundo_remote is now known as BUGabundo_lunch [13:05] #ubuntu-ps3 only has 3 people, has development for the Playstation 3 port stopped? === BUGabundo_lunch is now known as BUGabundo_work [15:15] please change it to wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/188447 [15:15] Launchpad bug 188447 in empathy "Can't add words to dictionaries" [Unknown,Confirmed] [15:33] this is also a wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/447098 [15:33] Launchpad bug 447098 in empathy "the new account wizard only let you create a jabber and g-talk account" [Low,Triaged] [15:34] I have a person I'm helping in #ubuntu which is unable to see the partitons (neither ubiquity nor gparted) using a 9.10 liveCD, and the workaround for Bug #459054 does no good. I'd really like to report a bug against this but it just fells like I'll have no useful info whatsoever to provide the report... Can I open a report solely based on anectotal evidence from helping in chat, or is that just not useful? [15:34] Launchpad bug 459054 in ubiquity "ubiquity partition step does not show some hard drives" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/459054 [15:38] arand: you can open the bug, but it would really help if we could collect some hard data [15:40] hggdh: What Kind of data would I request in this type of case? apart from fdisk -l which I presume will show up with "no partitions". [15:44] it would be more efficient for this person to learn how report bugs than for you to do it for them [15:52] True... but not always possible, and not knowing myself really how to report the bug, makes it kind of tricky to teach... === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:02] I even don't know what kind of package it should be reported against... mountall?? or just general ubuntu?? [16:04] arand -- screenshots, the autput of the real disk partitions [16:05] as compared to what the user sees [16:08] yea, "fdisk -l" from liveCD 9.04 & 9.10 should show the diskrepancy... But else than that... I don't know what more... [16:09] s/diskrepancy/discrepancy/ (although it made a nice pun) [16:14] so the output of 'fdisk -l', dmesg, and screenshots might help [16:15] arand: how many harddrives the user has? [16:35] jcastro: Did you find the time to look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Qense/BugSquad/AdoptPackage ? [16:35] qense: I am on a call, will check out after! [16:35] ok [16:39] please change it to wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/470096 [16:39] Launchpad bug 470096 in empathy "maybe NOTABug!" [Low,Incomplete] [16:40] LOL [16:40] with -that_ description ? [16:40] om26er: could the title be changed to something that describes this better? [16:40] om26er: please update the bug desctiption [16:40] done [16:40] bug 470096 [16:40] Launchpad bug 470096 in empathy "maybe NOTABug!" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/470096 [16:40] slow bot [16:41] bug 470096 [16:41] and sent it upstream too [16:41] * om26er is doing that [16:44] * vish chuckles at "still teething" ;p [16:44] om26er: done [16:45] charlie-tca, thanx and also upstreamed [16:45] Great! Glad you figured out what was really wanted there. [16:52] dinner time1 [16:52] ! [17:44] please mark this triaged/low https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/473662 [17:44] Launchpad bug 473662 in empathy "Empathy will not save Alias names for Yahoo account." [Low,Confirmed] [17:45] om26er: done === ikt_ is now known as ikt [18:06] there is no reboot/shutdown/logout confirmation message is this a bug or its what's supposed to happen? [18:07] What version? [18:07] lucid fully updated [18:08] Xubuntu will give the choices screen and then do what you tell it. Ubuntu will start the stupid timer, and you have to confirm what you told it to do. [18:08] Although I haven't tried Ubuntu Lucid lately, so it might be right. Ask in #ubuntu+1? [19:10] I had it at least until this monring (when I shutdown to get to my customer) === cyphermo1 is now known as cyphermox [19:53] qense: that looks great dude [19:54] jcastro: great, thanks! Is it ready for moving to the official page, you think? [19:55] qense: yeah let's do it [19:55] so I can blog about it and cross off this massive TODO. :D [19:55] ok, I'll move the page [19:55] it's always nice to clean a ToDo list ;) [19:55] this is much better than what we had in the past [19:55] you guys did a sweet job on this [19:59] thanks! I think this idea became the way it did because it slowly grew into its current shape, adopting a package seems very natural. The question if you want to pay special attention to a certain package has already been a question of the Bug Control application for a few years. [20:04] qense: ping me when it's merged pls [20:04] ping jcastro [20:04] hah [20:04] it was just a copy-paste [20:07] qense: do we care if we call it adopt-an-upstream or adopt-a-package? [20:08] well, upstream sounds like upstream, so package would make more sense, but it's just a name and I wouldn't care too much; if only we'd use it consistently [20:08] ok, package it is. :D [20:09] good enough [20:16] http://castrojo.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/docs-for-upstreams-and-docs-for-how-to-work-with-upstreams/ [20:16] nice picture [20:17] jcastro: and a good comprehensive blogpost! [20:18] jcastro: shouldn't https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Upstream/Adopt#Bugs get a reference to BugSquad/AdoptPackage? [20:19] you are correct [20:19] link to it, but leave it mentioned in the page [20:19] so it doesn't look like we forgot about it [20:19] something like "there's so much to do about bugs that it has it's own section!" or something, heh [20:20] I'll add a link somewhere in one of those points [20:23] jcastro: What about adding a sentence like this to the end of the Bugs paragraph: "More information of specifically working on bugs can be found on the wiki page of the Bug Squad's [[BugSquad/AdoptPackage|Adopt-a-Package]] initiative."? [20:23] yeah [20:23] just enough to not confuse them like we did to ourselves I think [20:23] ok [20:24] jcastro: Also, currently the text Bug Squad links to w.u.c/Bugs, whereas the BugSquad has its own wiki page at w.u.c/BugSquad, which contains more information about the team and less about bug reporting in general. Maybe Bug Squad should refer tot he team page? [20:25] dunno about that one. [20:25] ask pedro on that one [20:26] I'll ask him when I see him online [20:26] qense: I would say yes. We have information spread all around. It would be good to, at least, have them linking to each other [20:27] well, lets just first link to BugSquad and maybe ask pedro what he thinks. If someone doesn't like it (s)he can always bug this channel or change it. [20:28] I mean, the text is talking about the BugSquad, not about bugs in general in Ubuntu [20:38] yes, and busquad deals with bugs ;-) [20:39] also true [20:58] jcastro: on Upstream/FAQ, there is this sentence fragment: "In addition to that, if provide changes requiring additional or modified strings, those translations will only be doable in Launchpad, not upstream. " [20:59] jcastro: I tried, but I have no idea what is it you are talking about ;-) [20:59] I'm off, good night everyone! [21:00] hggdh: yeah that was dpm, I'll ask him tomorrow [21:00] jcastro: thank you === ikt is now known as ikt|sleep [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:29] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:30] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:30] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:30] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] DO NOT CLICK!!!!!!!!!!!!1 [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:31] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:32] !ops | mfqv [22:32] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:32] mfqv: Help! Seveas, Hobbsee, gnomefreak, coleSLAW, or dholbach [22:32] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:32] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:32] Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution! [22:32] DO NOT CLICK!!!!!!!!!!!! [22:32] !ops [22:32] Help! Seveas, Hobbsee, gnomefreak, coleSLAW, or dholbach [22:32] ? [22:32] Spam attack [22:33] fagan: its done [22:33] malicious links [22:39] heh. I was wondering how long for us to see it here... [22:40] and we note that social engeneering still works... [22:41] Huh? [22:42] you receive a message stating *your* machine has been infected, and the link *looks like* a freenode link... [22:42] hggdh: linux infected ? eheh [22:42] BUGabundo: very true [22:42] BUGabundo: Yeah, it's called a rootkit. [22:43] I know [22:43] jk [22:44] Is it attacking all of freenode or just the big ubuntu ones? [22:46] freenode. [22:46] dunno, it doesn't seem like #ubuntu was spammed (thank god) [22:47] it was [22:47] yofel, well, bugs, motu, meeting got spammed already [22:47] quite a few of our channels have been attacked [22:48] can't OPs make chanserv or a bot, ban by string? [22:48] there would have to be an attack before the ban [22:48] that would spread the link [22:48] cause more attacks [23:07] Can someone set Bug 511312 to wishlist [23:07] Launchpad bug 511312 in openoffice "incorrect rendering of SVG import" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511312 [23:09] bug 510261 - Whishlist/Triaged [23:09] Launchpad bug 510261 in synaptic "synaptic shows anonymous dialog if started by non-privileged user" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/510261