[00:56] <kermiac> yofel: re bug 306166 - looks like the OP had the issue in 8.10 & now they don't in 9.04
[00:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 306166 in network-manager-applet "nm-applet get incorrect netmask from DHCPD [openvpn]" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/306166
[01:24] <cjohnston> anyone know is FF3.6 is planned for lucid?
[01:35] <WeatherGod> which room do I go to to discuss a possible security issue?
[01:37] <kees> WeatherGod: #ubuntu-hardened is probably best. what's up?
[01:38] <micahg> cjohnston: yes
[01:38] <cjohnston> thanks micahg
[01:38] <WeatherGod> well, it isn't a huge security issue, but it could be done better
[01:38]  * micahg doesn't know of another upstream piece of software that people jump on teh day of release
[01:39] <kees> micahg: oh, hi!  asac said you were likely to pull in my PIE changes for firefox-3.6.head, is that right?
[01:39] <micahg> kees: yep, when I get home, I'm still bound to $WORK at the moment
[01:40] <kees> micahg: oh! okay, nevermind me then.  :)
[01:40] <micahg> kees: if you don't see it merged by midnight feel free to poke again :)
[01:40] <kees> micahg: heh, okay.  and if you run into any glitches with it, ping me.  I strongly suspect it will be fine, but I did only do testing on ff3.5
[01:41] <micahg> k
[04:18] <Wolfcastle> hello
[04:18] <cyan-spam> hi
 could use Triaged status
[04:22] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 450971 in network-manager-applet "Need mnemonic for buttons" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[04:29] <Wolfcastle> should knetworkmanager bugs be filed directly to kde?
[04:29] <micahg> Wolfcastle: if the bugs aren't related to the ubuntu packaging or major, yes
[04:30] <Wolfcastle> ok thanx
[04:40] <WeatherGod> micahg, think you could mark my bug 478962 as triaged
[04:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 478962 in rhythmbox "[karmic] Audio CDs do not play in rhythmbox after upgrade" [Low,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/478962
[04:40] <WeatherGod> (yes, the epic one)
[04:41] <WeatherGod> turns out it was as simple as just install "Banshee"
[04:42] <micahg> WeatherGod: done, are you upstreaming?
[04:43] <WeatherGod> I want to investigate a little more to figure out why Rhythmbox isn't finding the CD
[04:43] <WeatherGod> still not 100% certain if Rhythmbox is incapable of detecting the CD, or if it is user error
[04:44] <micahg> WeatherGod: have you checked upstream for a bug?
[04:44] <WeatherGod> no, not yet
[04:44] <WeatherGod> now that I know it is rhythmbox (I originally thought it was a problem with gnome), I will go looking
[04:45] <WeatherGod> want me to do that first before triaging?
[04:48] <micahg> WeatherGod: well, you had me mark triaged, so that should mean confirmed issue ready for developer
[04:48] <hggdh> cyan-spam: done
[04:48] <micahg> which means it might be upstream
[04:49] <cyan-spam> thanks hggdh
[04:49] <WeatherGod> well, the report itself is complete
[04:50] <WeatherGod> the exact cause is still the mystery, though
[04:51] <WeatherGod> it is ready for a developer, in that sense
[04:52] <WeatherGod> I gotta run... I will look for upstream tomorrow morning
[04:53] <cyan-spam> is it just me or is gitweb's interface really annoying? how can you find the history of a specific file?
[04:55] <hggdh> you can git clone & then git cola for an easier view
[04:55] <hggdh> gitweb is a bit more limited
[04:55] <cyan-spam> yeah... thanks.
[07:42] <kermiac> kees: do you mind if i mark bug #511052 as a dupe of bug #511014?
[07:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 511052 in wine1.2 "uninstallable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511052
[07:43] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 511014 in wine1.2 "package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511014
[07:43] <kermiac> it appears to be the same issue
[07:45] <kees> kermiac: they're separate issues
[07:45] <kees> kermiac: 511014 is because the debconf files were not installed but the postinst needs them
[07:45] <kermiac> ok, thanks kees. that's why i thought I'd ask first
[07:45] <kees> kermiac: 511052 is that the wine version conflicts are for the wrong versions.
[07:46] <kees> kermiac: cool
[07:46] <kees> kermiac: I'm actually uploading a fix for both of those and another problem now.
[07:46] <kermiac> kees: awesome :)
[07:52] <kermiac> can someone pls mark bug #511014 as triaged?
[07:52] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 511014 in wine1.2 "package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511014
[07:55] <kees> kermiac: sure thing
[07:55] <kermiac> kees: thanks
[08:57] <BUGabundo_remote> yawn o/
[08:58] <kermiac> hey BUGabundo_remote morning :)
[12:10] <xteejx> bug 511014, when will this hit the repos?
[12:10] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 511014 in wine1.2 "package wine1.2 1.1.36-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511014
[12:14] <jpds> xteejx: When it's done building: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.2/1.1.36-0ubuntu3
[12:14] <xteejx> jpds: Oh right, is that done automatically? How long does it normally take out of interest?
[12:16] <jpds> Varies, clicking on the arches will tell you what LP thinks.
[12:17] <ikt> firefox 3.6 in alpha 3?
[12:17] <xteejx> jpds: 2 hours, ok thanks, just wondered - trying to confirm a bug report :)
[12:19] <^arky^> hi all
[12:19] <^arky^> need help patching this bug 507964
[12:19] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 507964 in compiz "Application Switcher keybinds conflicts with gnome default" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/507964
[12:26] <BUGabundo_remote> ikt: transition is just occuring in the archive as we speak
[12:27] <BUGabundo_remote> ikt: shouold be done by next week
[12:27] <ikt> BUGabundo_remote:  nice!
[13:05] <xteejx> #ubuntu-ps3 only has 3 people, has development for the Playstation 3 port stopped?
[15:15] <om26er> please change it to wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/188447
[15:15] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 188447 in empathy "Can't add words to dictionaries" [Unknown,Confirmed]
[15:33] <om26er> this is also a wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/447098
[15:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 447098 in empathy "the new account wizard only let you create a jabber and g-talk account" [Low,Triaged]
[15:34] <arand> I have a person I'm helping in #ubuntu which is unable to see the partitons (neither ubiquity nor gparted) using a 9.10 liveCD, and the workaround for Bug #459054 does no good. I'd really like to report a bug against this but it just fells like I'll have no useful info whatsoever to provide  the report... Can I open a report solely based on anectotal evidence from helping in chat, or is that just not useful?
[15:34] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 459054 in ubiquity "ubiquity partition step does not show some hard drives" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/459054
[15:38] <hggdh> arand: you can open the bug, but it would really help if we could collect some hard data
[15:40] <arand> hggdh: What Kind of data would I request in this type of case? apart from fdisk -l which I presume will show up with "no partitions".
[15:44] <kyubutsu> it would be more efficient for this person to learn how report bugs than for you to do it for them
[15:52] <arand> True... but not always possible, and not knowing myself really how to report the bug, makes it kind of tricky to teach...
[16:02] <arand> I even don't know what kind of package it should be reported against... mountall?? or just general ubuntu??
[16:04] <hggdh> arand -- screenshots, the autput of the real disk partitions
[16:05] <hggdh> as compared to what the user sees
[16:08] <arand> yea, "fdisk -l" from liveCD 9.04 & 9.10 should show the diskrepancy... But else than that... I don't know what more...
[16:09] <arand> s/diskrepancy/discrepancy/ (although it made a nice pun)
[16:14] <hggdh> so the output of 'fdisk -l', dmesg, and screenshots might help
[16:15] <hggdh> arand: how many harddrives the user has?
[16:35] <qense> jcastro: Did you find the time to look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Qense/BugSquad/AdoptPackage ?
[16:35] <jcastro> qense: I am on a call, will check out after!
[16:35] <qense> ok
[16:39] <om26er> please change it to wishlist https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/470096
[16:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 470096 in empathy "maybe NOTABug!" [Low,Incomplete]
[16:40] <BUGabundo_remote> LOL
[16:40] <BUGabundo_remote> with -that_ description ?
[16:40] <charlie-tca> om26er: could the title be changed to something that describes this better?
[16:40] <BUGabundo_remote> om26er: please update the bug desctiption
[16:40] <om26er> done
[16:40] <BUGabundo_remote> bug 470096
[16:40] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 470096 in empathy "maybe NOTABug!" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/470096
[16:40] <BUGabundo_remote> slow bot
[16:41] <om26er> bug 470096
[16:41] <BUGabundo_remote> and sent it upstream too
[16:41]  * om26er is doing that
[16:44]  * vish chuckles at "still teething" ;p
[16:44] <charlie-tca> om26er: done
[16:45] <om26er> charlie-tca, thanx and also upstreamed
[16:45] <charlie-tca> Great! Glad you figured out what was really wanted there.
[16:52] <qense> dinner time1
[16:52] <qense> !
[17:44] <om26er> please mark this triaged/low https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/473662
[17:44] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 473662 in empathy "Empathy will not save Alias names for Yahoo account." [Low,Confirmed]
[17:45] <charlie-tca> om26er: done
[18:06] <om26er> there is no reboot/shutdown/logout confirmation message is this a bug or its what's supposed to happen?
[18:07] <charlie-tca> What version?
[18:07] <om26er> lucid fully updated
[18:08] <charlie-tca> Xubuntu will give the choices screen and then do what you tell it. Ubuntu will start the stupid timer, and you have to confirm what you told it to do.
[18:08] <charlie-tca> Although I haven't tried Ubuntu Lucid lately, so it might be right. Ask in #ubuntu+1?
[19:10] <hggdh> I had it at least until this monring (when I shutdown to get to my customer)
[19:53] <jcastro> qense: that looks great dude
[19:54] <qense> jcastro: great, thanks! Is it ready for moving to the official page, you think?
[19:55] <jcastro> qense: yeah let's do it
[19:55] <jcastro> so I can blog about it and cross off this massive TODO. :D
[19:55] <qense> ok, I'll move the page
[19:55] <qense> it's always nice to clean a ToDo list ;)
[19:55] <jcastro> this is much better than what we had in the past
[19:55] <jcastro> you guys did a sweet job on this
[19:59] <qense> thanks! I think this idea became the way it did because it slowly grew into its current shape, adopting a package seems very natural. The question if you want to pay special attention to a certain package has already been a question of the Bug Control application for a few years.
[20:04] <jcastro> qense: ping me when it's merged pls
[20:04] <qense> ping jcastro
[20:04] <jcastro> hah
[20:04] <qense> it was just a copy-paste
[20:07] <jcastro> qense: do we care if we call it adopt-an-upstream or adopt-a-package?
[20:08] <qense> well, upstream sounds like upstream, so package would make more sense, but it's just a name and I wouldn't care too much; if only we'd use it consistently
[20:08] <jcastro> ok, package it is. :D
[20:09] <qense> good enough
[20:16] <jcastro> http://castrojo.wordpress.com/2010/01/22/docs-for-upstreams-and-docs-for-how-to-work-with-upstreams/
[20:16] <qense> nice picture
[20:17] <qense> jcastro: and a good comprehensive blogpost!
[20:18] <qense> jcastro: shouldn't https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Upstream/Adopt#Bugs get a reference to BugSquad/AdoptPackage?
[20:19] <jcastro> you are correct
[20:19] <jcastro> link to it, but leave it mentioned in the page
[20:19] <jcastro> so it doesn't look like we forgot about it
[20:19] <jcastro> something like "there's so much to do about bugs that it has it's own section!" or something, heh
[20:20] <qense> I'll add a link somewhere in one of those points
[20:23] <qense> jcastro: What about adding a sentence like this to the end of the Bugs paragraph: "More information of specifically working on bugs can be found on the wiki page of the Bug Squad's [[BugSquad/AdoptPackage|Adopt-a-Package]] initiative."?
[20:23] <jcastro> yeah
[20:23] <jcastro> just enough to not confuse them like we did to ourselves I think
[20:23] <qense> ok
[20:24] <qense> jcastro: Also, currently the text Bug Squad links to w.u.c/Bugs, whereas the BugSquad has its own wiki page at w.u.c/BugSquad, which contains more information about the team and less about bug reporting in general. Maybe Bug Squad should refer tot he team page?
[20:25] <jcastro> dunno about that one.
[20:25] <jcastro> ask pedro on that one
[20:26] <qense> I'll ask him when I see him online
[20:26] <hggdh> qense: I would say yes. We have information spread all around. It would be good to, at least, have them linking to each other
[20:27] <qense> well, lets just first link to BugSquad and maybe ask pedro what he thinks. If someone doesn't like it (s)he can always bug this channel or change it.
[20:28] <qense> I mean, the text is talking about the BugSquad, not about bugs in general in Ubuntu
[20:38] <hggdh> yes, and busquad deals with bugs ;-)
[20:39] <qense> also true
[20:58] <hggdh> jcastro: on Upstream/FAQ, there is this sentence fragment: "In addition to that, if provide changes requiring additional or modified strings, those translations will only be doable in Launchpad, not upstream. "
[20:59] <hggdh> jcastro: I tried, but I have no idea what is it you are talking about ;-)
[20:59] <qense> I'm off, good night everyone!
[21:00] <jcastro> hggdh: yeah that was dpm, I'll ask him tomorrow
[21:00] <hggdh> jcastro: thank you
[22:29] <wonil> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <wonil> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <thyh> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <thyh> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <rapf> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <rapf> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <lcaqubys> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <lcaqubys> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <rowahelg> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:29] <rowahelg> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:30] <bxp> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:30] <bxp> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:30] <bxp> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <maco> DO NOT CLICK!!!!!!!!!!!!1
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:31] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:32] <maco> !ops | mfqv
[22:32] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:32] <ubot4> mfqv: Help! Seveas, Hobbsee, gnomefreak, coleSLAW, or dholbach
[22:32] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:32] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:32] <mfqv> Your machine has been infected by the recent spam attacks - visit http://www2.freenode.pl/ for a quick and easy solution!
[22:32] <maco> DO NOT CLICK!!!!!!!!!!!!
[22:32] <fagan> !ops
[22:32] <ubot4> Help! Seveas, Hobbsee, gnomefreak, coleSLAW, or dholbach
[22:32] <gnomefreak> ?
[22:32] <fagan> Spam attack
[22:33] <gnomefreak> fagan: its done
[22:33] <maco> malicious links
[22:39] <hggdh> heh. I was wondering how long for us to see it here...
[22:40] <hggdh> and we note that social engeneering still works...
[22:41] <fagan> Huh?
[22:42] <hggdh> you receive a message stating *your* machine has been infected, and the link *looks like* a freenode link...
[22:42] <BUGabundo> hggdh: linux infected ? eheh
[22:42] <fagan> BUGabundo: very true
[22:42] <jpds> BUGabundo: Yeah, it's called a rootkit.
[22:43] <BUGabundo> I know
[22:43] <BUGabundo> jk
[22:44] <fagan> Is it attacking all of freenode or just the big ubuntu ones?
[22:46] <jpds> freenode.
[22:46] <yofel> dunno, it doesn't seem like #ubuntu was spammed (thank god)
[22:47] <tsimpson> it was
[22:47] <nigel_nb> yofel, well, bugs, motu, meeting got spammed already
[22:47] <tsimpson> quite a few of our channels have been attacked
[22:48] <BUGabundo> can't OPs make chanserv or a bot, ban by string?
[22:48] <tsimpson> there would have to be an attack before the ban
[22:48] <tsimpson> that would spread the link
[22:48] <tsimpson> cause more attacks
[23:07] <Thingymebob> Can someone set Bug 511312 to wishlist
[23:07] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 511312 in openoffice "incorrect rendering of SVG import" [Unknown,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511312
[23:09] <yofel> bug 510261 - Whishlist/Triaged
[23:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 510261 in synaptic "synaptic shows anonymous dialog if started by non-privileged user" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/510261