/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/01/22/#ubuntu-mozillateam.txt

mahfouzi guess lucid will have 3.6 not 3.700:00
micahglike if there's a major update by mozilla PPA might get it and archive might not for weeks/months00:00
asacbut for now it definitly is ;)00:00
micahgasac: so, what should the PPA name be?00:02
micahgand where?00:02
asacmicahg: i think firefox-stable00:07
asacfta didnt vote?00:07
micahgasac: under ~mozillateam?00:07
asacmicahg: created https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable00:08
ftaif it's manual, i don't mind where. but ~mozillateam has been a kitchen sink for a long time, bad idea.00:09
asacso thats it ;)00:09
micahgasac: k00:09
micahgas soon as it hits lucid, I'll backport00:09
asacfta: we have a new name, so the ppa can stay random crack ;)00:09
* micahg will delete his own ff-stable PPA :)00:10
micahgasac: can we do thunderbird-stable as well?00:10
asacmicahg: lets first get firefox-stable flying00:12
micahgasac: k ;)00:12
asacfor tbird we first have to finish the package rename and the upload to lucid00:13
micahgasac: k, you doing that or should I try again?00:13
asacmicahg: give it a try again. i will hav eto do it over weekend if you fail ;)00:20
ftaok, i'm off. 'night all00:22
asacnight fta00:25
micahgasac: k00:29
micahgif I don't finish by Sun morning I'll let you know asac00:30
asacmicahg: guess on sat nothing will happen, so let me know friday night :)00:30
micahgasac: I was going to do most of the work sat night :)00:31
asachmm00:31
asacif i start before ill let you know00:31
micahgtonight I have to finish up this work project00:31
asacso ok00:31
micahgk00:31
* asac has to leave the party too ... early appointment tomorrow00:32
ccheneyasac: hmm don't know about gcc-uno00:50
=== asac_ is now known as asac
LLStarkshey asac. will there now be a 3.8/4.0 mercurial trunk?03:33
ejatanyone having this with latest chromium ?04:36
ejatYour profile could not be opened correctly.04:36
ejatSome features may be unavailable.  Please check that the profile exists and you have permission to read and write its contents.04:36
micahgasac: you're not up, are you?05:06
micahgasac: nm05:30
ccheneyasac: the new diff is under my incoming dir on chinstrap05:33
RAOFI've just been made aware of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel ; I see that we're going to drop support for packages using xulrunner.05:51
micahgRAOF: he's not around...05:52
RAOFmicahg: asac's the only one who'll be interested in that?05:54
micahgRAOF: interested?  he'll be the only one to answer you about plans :)05:58
RAOFAh, ok.06:03
RAOFI was just going to suggest that we might need to port gnome-shell to seed rather than gjs if mozilla libraries are going away.06:03
micahgRAOF: probably not a bad idea, but you can check with him, usually back around 9 or 10 UTC06:04
EruditeHermithey, is there a firefox-3.6 package for karmic that replaces the default firefox?07:58
EruditeHermitthe ppas seem to only install it as namoroka08:00
kbrosnannot at this time08:01
asacmoin moin08:10
anderskIt looks like firefox 3.6 in the ubuntu-mozilla-daily PPA recently started configuring itself with --disable-system-cairo, which makes subpixel fonts look poor.  Where’s the right place to report this?08:12
asacandersk: here08:15
asacand upstrem08:15
asacthough i doubt that we will see a fix for this ;)08:16
asacupstream wants us to use in-source cairo (like verything else)08:16
anderskEw.08:16
asacand the in-source cairo has problem to talk to the system cairo used gtk08:16
asac;)08:16
asaci investigated once ... it was bad for in-source cairo. yes08:16
asacandersk: please file a bug upstream though08:17
asacits important to get filed08:17
RAOFasac: Regarding the dropping of xulrunner to universe, has any thought been given to gnome-shell at this point?08:17
anderskOkay.  Is there context I can link to that shows where upstream asked for in-source cairo?  (which justifies this as an upstream bug)08:18
asacandersk: no. file the bug without that comment08:18
asacandersk: all bugs are upstream ;) ... no need for justification08:32
asacyou could confirm that ubuntu uses in-source cairo now ... so they dont start saying its our cairo08:33
asacRAOF: gnome-shell needs to go somewhere else. in general we dont allow libmozjs consumers in main08:33
asacas there are no ABI/API guarantees upstream08:34
asac(for security updates that is)08:34
asacafaik, it makes progress on that08:34
asaci will check08:34
asaconce seb is online08:34
anderskYeah, I checked the build log to verify that the ubuntu-mozilla-daily package is built with --disable-system-cairo.08:38
anderskand about:buildconfig08:38
anderskI submitted https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54131908:38
ubottuMozilla bug 541319 in General "Poor subpixel font rendering compared to rest of system in FF3.6 on Ubuntu" [Normal,Unconfirmed]08:38
kbrosnanplease make sure that you are not hitting the following https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45861208:40
ubottuMozilla bug 458612 in Graphics "(Ubuntu) system fontconfig settings override GNOME font rendering screen settings" [Normal,Resolved: invalid]08:40
anderskI don’t think so, my /etc/fonts/conf.d/11-lcd-filter-lcddefault.conf assigns lcdfilter=lcddefault to all fonts systemwide.08:41
anderskAnd I use several non-GNOME applications that look fine (e.g. drscheme, gitk).  Not to mention Firefox itself until today.08:42
anderskThis was previously fixed as https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164640 (with the fix being to start using system cairo).08:48
ubottuUbuntu bug 164640 in xulrunner-1.9 "Build Firefox 3 against a subpixel-patched cairo" [Medium,Fix released]08:48
RAOFasac: gnome-shell could be ported to seed relatively painlessly I believe.08:55
BUGabundo_remoteyawn o/08:57
asacRAOF: right. and i thought that was already ongoing (and also discussed upstream)08:57
asacandersk: can you do me a favour and check whether chaning the subpixel rendering type in the gnome settings changes anything at all?08:58
asacsame for hinting style08:58
asacdoes that make any difference if you change something there08:58
asacandersk: did you upgrade dailies today? did that went smooth?08:59
asacpackaging wise08:59
AnAntHello09:05
AnAntasac: so xulrunner won't be removed ?09:05
asacTBD09:07
asaci guess we wont be able to get rid of it completely09:07
[reed]asac: cairo issues aren't gtk widget.... they go in Core :: Graphics09:10
[reed]fyi for future :)09:11
asac[reed]: early in the morning. i didnt even spot that entry ;)09:11
asaci scrolled a few times up and down and knew it was wrong somewhat09:11
AnAntasac: so, will it be sync'ed from Debian ?09:11
AnAntasac: Debian have added a debhelper script in xulrunner09:12
asacwe have that too afaik09:12
asacand for now we wont sync09:12
asacmaybe next cycle09:13
asacdepends on a few things09:13
AnAntok, thanks09:33
White_Slounhi, I get a little bug in firefox-3.6 installing from PPA http://pastebin.com/f45d7c4b009:38
White_SlounI use ubuntu 9.0409:38
asaclet me check09:52
asacWhite_Sloun: can you stay here for a few more hours? we have to wait for jdstrand for that09:52
asache is in US and will probably wake up a bit later09:52
asacmost likely we need to not do apparmore on jaunty09:52
asacWhite_Sloun: those odd characters in the paste .. whast that?09:53
White_Slounthis is bad encoding for words in russian )09:53
asacah ;)09:54
White_SlounI will wait here for 2 hours, maybe more, for contact mail to segooon@gmail.com09:56
asacthanks09:56
Greeneryi can't run firefox 3.6. Gtting this error: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360570/10:38
asacnmm10:39
asacGreenery: dpkg -l firefox\* please10:39
Greeneryhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/360575/10:40
asachmm10:41
asacGreenery: dpkg -L firefox please10:41
Greeneryhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/360577/10:42
asachmm10:43
asacGreenery: run strace -f -eopen firefox 2>&1 | tee /tmp/out.log.txt10:43
asacand after it failed:10:43
asacpost the out.log.txt10:43
asac/usr/lib/firefox-3.6.1pre/firefox: 59: dirname: Permission denied feels odd10:44
asacGreenery: do you have apparmor profile enabled?10:44
Greeneryi've never used apparmor10:44
Greeneryi can't run the command you've just given me10:44
asacwhy?10:45
Greeneryo wait nvm10:45
Greenery>.<10:45
asacwhat happens?10:45
asacok10:45
Greeneryhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/360580/10:46
asacGreenery: please post your dmesg output too10:47
Greeneryhttp://paste.ubuntu.com/360582/10:49
asacGreenery: yes, your apparmor profile is enabled it seems10:59
Greeneryoh okay, how do i disable it?10:59
Greeneryor can firefox work with apparmor enabled?11:00
asacits supposed to work, but seems its buggy after the package rework11:00
asacGreenery: try to run aa-complain /usr/bin/firefox11:01
asaccheck if you have /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox afterwards11:01
asacjdstrand: ^^11:01
asaci think we need to work a bit on aa rules11:02
Greeneryok it is available on that directory11:02
asacdoesnt help?11:03
Greenerystill can't open it11:04
asacwait for jdstrand11:05
asache probably will be here in a bit11:05
asachttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/AppArmor11:05
asacGreenery: sudo aa-complain /path/to/bin11:05
asacPut all profiles into complain mode11:06
asacsudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/*11:06
asacso try sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.fireofx11:06
asacfox11:06
asacso try sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox11:06
asacor try all ;)11:06
asacGreenery: ^^11:06
asaccheck the help page above too11:07
Greeneryokay11:07
asacjdstrand: we have /usr/bin/firefox now ... that runs /usr/lib/firefox-*/run-mozilla.sh ... which in turn runs /usr/lib/firefox-*/firefox-bin :)11:07
asacmaybe appending the -bin to the profile be enough?11:08
Greeneryi got it working with sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/*11:08
asace.g.g11:08
asacGreenery: thanks!11:08
asacguess that should be fixed before i upload 3.611:08
Greeneryat last ^^11:08
asacGreenery: can you wait a bit ... i want you to try something ;)11:08
Greenerysure11:08
asacbackup /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox11:09
asacthen edit that file11:09
asacand to the line:11:09
asac/usr/lib/firefox-*/firefox ...11:09
asacmake11:09
asac/usr/lib/firefox-*/firefox-bin11:09
asacand see if that helps if you set everything in enforce mode again11:09
Greenerydo i edit this line: /usr/lib/firefox*/firefox{,*[^s][^h]} flags=(complain)11:13
Greeneryinto the new one?11:13
asacyes11:14
BUGabundo_remoteasac: FF 3.7 WFM11:14
BUGabundo_remoteFYI11:14
asacwe didnt change 3.7 ;)11:15
BUGabundo_remotecoolio11:15
BUGabundo_remoteif you need smallish tests, let em know11:15
asacyou will get your sufferage soon ;)11:15
BUGabundo_remotebit busy, but I can always spare some time for you11:15
asacfirefox 3.6 i am mostly concerned atm11:15
asacso you are of the hook ;)11:15
BUGabundo_remoteeh11:16
BUGabundo_remoteoh before I forget11:16
asacshoot11:16
BUGabundo_remoteseems changing NM wifi from user profile to all users works again11:16
asacBUGabundo_remote: in lucid?11:16
BUGabundo_remotebefore it would not connect11:17
BUGabundo_remoteasac: yes11:17
asacor dailies?11:17
asacgreat11:17
BUGabundo_remotethink so11:17
asacyou dont run dailies?11:17
Greeneryok, firefox load fine with the edit you asked11:17
BUGabundo_remotenetwork-manager:  Installed: 0.8~rc2-0ubuntu2~nmt311:17
asacGreenery: hmm. i am not 100% sure we need to reload the profile somewhat11:17
asacGreenery: if you change back, does it stop working again?11:17
BUGabundo_remote *** 0.8~rc2-0ubuntu2~nmt3 011:17
BUGabundo_remote        500 http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main Packages11:17
BUGabundo_remote        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status11:17
BUGabundo_remote     0.8~rc2-0ubuntu1 011:17
BUGabundo_remote        500 http://neacm.fe.up.pt lucid/main Packages11:17
asacBUGabundo_remote: ok. so you probably didnt try recently?11:18
* asac assumes its not the last bit for rc2 that fixed it11:18
asacBUGabundo_remote: if there is abug open about this, please post your findings and set to fix committed11:18
Greeneryasac: it works even if i changed it back11:19
asacGreenery: right. thats why i think the profile thing wasnt reloaded11:19
asacGreenery: did you run aa-enforce?11:19
BUGabundo_remoteasac: no bug, from me at least11:19
[reed]asac: can you remove 3.6 from https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/449744/11:19
ubottuUbuntu bug 449744 in iceweasel "Firefox crashes when attempting to load Firebug 1.5 alphas" [Unknown,Fix released]11:19
BUGabundo_remoteI tried as recently as last week11:19
[reed]I can't figure out how to do it11:19
[reed]or maybe I don't have the needed permissions11:19
Greeneryasac: no i didn't run that11:19
asaclet me check11:19
BUGabundo_remotedidn't work. and yesterday it worked again11:19
asacGreenery: you ened to ... atm you just complain11:19
asacBUGabundo_remote: ok. when did you last try?11:20
asac(and it didnt)11:20
asac[reed]: thats fix released i guess?11:20
BUGabundo_remoteasac: I'm not entirely sure, but I think last week11:20
BUGabundo_remotewhen I got a new router setup11:20
asacyou can set to invalid or fix released11:20
BUGabundo_remoteand created a new WiFi and tried to set up All Users11:20
Greeneryasac: I used aa-enforce, loads fine11:21
asac[reed]: i think micahg intentionall set those so we remember to close the bug on next upload ...11:21
asacor wasnt that fixed for "3.5.8"?11:21
[reed]asac: but it never affected 3.6 in the first place, and people are getting confused11:21
asacah 3.611:21
asacsorry misread11:21
asacok11:21
asacset to invalid11:22
asacdone11:22
[reed]thanks11:22
[reed]er11:22
[reed]you set the wrong one11:22
[reed]but now that I know what to do11:22
[reed]I can fix!11:22
asac;)11:22
asac[reed]: i fixed that i think11:22
asac3.6 -> invalid11:22
asac3.5 -> fix committed11:22
[reed]cool11:23
BUGabundo_remoteasac: strange request:11:47
BUGabundo_remotewe got several ppl here at work, running debian and using ubuntumozilla PPAs11:48
BUGabundo_remotewould you consider adding debian release branchs?11:48
BUGabundo_remoteat least would allow software-properties-kde/gtk to work, and handle depencies11:49
* BUGabundo_remote ducks11:49
asacBUGabundo_remote: not sure what you want12:00
asacfolks should use ubuntu12:00
BUGabundo_remoteahaahahahahahaahah12:00
BUGabundo_remote*should* is not Freedom of choice :D12:01
fta2asac,  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/firefox-3.6pre/components/libnkgnomevfs.so', which is also in package firefox-3.6-gnome-support 0:3.6~hg20100117r33523+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~karmic12:02
fta2didn't you say you fixed it?12:03
asacfta2: i added the replaces12:03
asaccheck if firefox has replaces on firefox-3.6-gnome-support12:04
asacfirefox-3.6-gnome-support12:04
asacthats what i see12:04
asacin firefox branch i have12:04
fta2$ apt-cache show firefox | grep Replace12:05
fta2Replaces: firefox-3.0, firefox-3.5, firefox-3.612:05
asacfta2:12:07
asacfor my $copyright (sort keys %{$$data{$dir}{$license}}) {12:07
asac      my @values = values %{$$data{$dir}{$license}};12:07
asac      if ($#values == 1) {12:07
asac        printf "Files: %s/*\n", $dir;12:07
asac      } else {12:07
asacfta2: thats odd. i definitly committed it12:07
asaclet me double check12:07
asacyes. all committed12:08
asacsure you ran update ?12:08
asacfta2: so about that snippet ... that values == 1 seems to not work12:08
asaci still get { } around single files12:08
asacin licensecheck.pl12:08
fta2$#values gives the number of values of that list minus 112:13
fta2so use 0 to test for only 1 item, and -1 for emptiness12:14
asacheh12:16
asacok12:16
* asac tries12:16
asachmm doesnt help12:17
asacnevermind12:17
asaclets fix that later ;)12:17
asacfta2: shit12:18
asacso we need src/chrome/third_party/wtl12:18
asac?12:18
asacFiles: src/chrome/third_party/wtl/include/{atlapp.h,atlcrack.h,atlctrls.h,atlctrlw.h,atlctrlx.h,atlddx.h,atldlgs.h,atlfind.h,atlframe.h,atlgdi.h,atlmisc.h,atlprint.h,atlres.h,atlresce.h,atlscrl.h,atlsplit.h,atltheme.h,atluser.h,atlwince.h,atlwinx.h}12:19
asacCopyright: Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.  This file is a part of the Windows Template Library. The use and distribution terms for this software are covered by the Microsoft Permissive License (Ms-PL) which can be found in the file:12:19
* asac hates that appearing ;)12:19
BUGabundo_remoteasac: fta: if you have a moment: why do FF 3.6, 3.7 and Chromium all drop logins after restarting the browser on so many more sites then before ?12:22
BUGabundo_remotea coworker just notice that after the upgrade for FF 3.6 in Mac.12:22
asacno clue12:22
asacguess websites get more broken12:22
BUGabundo_remote:(12:22
asacchromium is bad in general for me12:22
asacfor logins12:22
BUGabundo_remotefirefox does the same12:22
asacbut firefox still works for the sites i am using12:22
BUGabundo_remotestuff like gmail12:23
asacworks12:23
BUGabundo_remoteeven with Remember Me12:23
asacprobably extension12:23
BUGabundo_remoteno addons on his mac12:25
asacBUGabundo_remote: file upstream bug. havent seen it12:30
asacand dont have a mac12:30
asacfta2: do you know whats up with wtl?12:32
* asac almost dputted it ;)12:32
BUGabundo_remoteasac: also happens to me in ubuntu12:35
BUGabundo_remoteso I tought it was a new Policy from browser makers12:35
asacBUGabundo_remote: check with [reed] then12:36
BUGabundo_remote(12:20:21 PM) i.ca: forteller: WTF? Has the Firefox 3.6 update yesterday + today deleted all my Firefox 3.6 beta/RC profiles!? :( !Ubuntu [19721095]12:36
BUGabundo_remoteI guess they were "imported", right?12:36
asacBUGabundo_remote: users will get asked in todays update12:36
asacyesterday it kept using the ffox 3.5 profile12:37
asacfta2: i will drop it. afaics its only incuded for win12:38
[reed]BUGabundo_remote: you're talking about cookies?12:39
[reed]Chromium and Firefox use a very similar cookie implementation12:40
[reed]as in, I think Chromium just uses Firefox's impl12:40
[reed]so, if you see issues, please file bugs12:40
BUGabundo_remote[reed]: I think so12:40
[reed]Core :: Networking: Cookies12:40
BUGabundo_remoteat least for site's I've seen it12:40
BUGabundo_remotelike gmail, identica, etc12:40
BUGabundo_remote[reed]: what I'm seeing is sites that usually didn't logout before (early chromium/chromium 3, FF 3.5.x), now loose logins even if Remember Me box is selected12:41
BUGabundo_remotebut haven't managed to put my finger on it yet, its one of those "I have this strange feeling this wasn't like this before" cases, and a coworker just mentioned the same, reforcing my beliefes12:42
[reed]yeah12:43
[reed]so, you should enable NSPR logging for cookies12:43
[reed]and file a bug12:43
BUGabundo_remotehow do I do that?!12:43
[reed]one moment12:46
[reed]hmm12:47
[reed]file a bug, dwitte will tell you!12:47
BUGabundo_remoteokay12:47
BUGabundo_remote[reed]: asac: fyi https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54135612:54
ubottuMozilla bug 541356 in General "session lost after restart" [Normal,Unconfirmed]12:55
asacBUGabundo_remote: NSPR_LOG_MODULES=all:512:57
asacexport12:57
asacto get loads of verbose output12:57
BUGabundo_remoteasac: where to ?12:58
asacin the terminal before you start12:59
asacexport NSPR_LOG_MODULES=all:512:59
asacfirefox12:59
BUGabundo_remoteahh12:59
BUGabundo_remotebrowser already open12:59
BUGabundo_remoterestarting12:59
asackillall firefox12:59
asacfirefox-3.712:59
BUGabundo_remoteyeah13:00
BUGabundo_remotethat's crazy debug13:00
BUGabundo_remoteteeing to a log13:00
BUGabundo_remotelunch13:01
=== BUGabundo_remote is now known as BUGabundo_lunch
asacfta2: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=${CHROMIUM_USER_FLAGS:-"$CHROMIUM_FLAGS"} as bashism?13:22
asacchromium-browser.sh should be bash then i guess13:22
asacdo you know?13:22
fta2asac, i don't think so13:28
* asac wonders how to find out ;)13:28
fta2asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360651/13:30
asacso pitti says its not a bashism, but doesnt make sense ;)13:31
fta2asac, full example: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360653/13:32
fta2asac, basically, i hate bash and bashisms13:33
asacfta2: but is dash a proof? does it work in posh?13:34
fta2in ubuntu, /bin/sh is dash, so it works fine13:35
asacsure13:35
fta2even if /bin/sh is bash, it's fine too13:35
asacanyway, pitti agrees with you13:35
asacthats good enough for me13:35
asacfta2: ill remove "do something aobut amd64" from TODO13:37
jdstrandGreenery, asac: aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/* is way too heavy-handed. All the apparmor profiles are now in complain mode. Better to just do: sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.613:38
asacjdstrand: i commited something to firefox-3.6.head ... can you check that13:38
asac(for apparmor)13:38
jdstrandGreenery: please perform: sudo aa-enforce /etc/apparmor.d/* ; sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.613:38
asacwe have a new binary now -> firefox-bin13:38
asacits run like firefox -> run-mozilla.sh -> firefox-bin13:38
jdstrandasac: I already made the dirname and pwd changes yesterday I think13:38
asachmm13:39
asacso its a real issue?13:39
asacok13:39
asacbut the binary name is now wrong13:39
asacso i think -bin is correct there13:39
jdstrandasac: r476 and r477 should have fixed those (timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 07:32:53 -0600)13:40
asachmm13:40
asacjdstrand: yeah.13:41
jdstrandasac: the profile is supposed to protect /usr/lib/@APPNAME@*/firefox{,*[^s][^h]}13:41
=== BUGabundo_lunch is now known as BUGabundo_work
asacjdstrand: i changed that to:13:41
asac/usr/lib/@APPNAME@*/firefox-bin...13:41
jdstrandasac: we don't protect /usr/bin13:41
asacright13:41
asacbut the binary doesnt exist in the all-static build ;)13:41
jdstrandok13:41
asacthats why he got busted13:41
jdstrand(I'm just working through the two distinct issues we are having)13:42
asaclike /usr/bin/firefox calls /usr/lib/APPDIR/run-mozilla.sh (to set envs) and calls /usr/lib/appdir/firefox-bin (the real binary)13:42
asacright13:42
jdstrandasac: you changed the pathname already?13:42
asacyes13:42
asacjust wanted to check with you if thats obviously wrong13:42
asacbecause he couldnt really confirm that it worked13:42
* jdstrand pulls the latest commits13:42
asacjdstrand: you can check the firefox .deb in daily13:42
jdstrandk13:42
asacthat doesnt have the new profile yet though13:43
asacapparmore file i mean13:43
asacbut i just added -bin13:43
jdstrandasac: so the daily has the updated path is what you are saying?13:43
asacasac: It supports usr/local/bin/tls.py but not usr/local/bin/tls which is why I comment.13:44
asacfta2: thats about the tlslite patch13:44
* asac checks13:45
asacjdstrand: right.13:45
fta2asac, eh?13:45
jdstrandasac: ok, I'll review it and make changes if needed. at first glance it seems fine13:45
fta2asac, why do you need tls?13:45
fta2it's needed only to run the testsuite (in chromium)13:46
asacfta2: you have a patch13:46
fta2you can drop it, pitti rejected my system phython-tlslite package so i'm back to the in-source one13:46
asachmm ok13:47
asaci fixed it fo rnow13:47
asace.g. added that path ;)13:47
asacwe can drop it if you are ok13:47
* asac does that13:47
Greeneryjdstrand: asac: so do I need to perform the command?13:47
jdstrandGreenery: please perform the command I mentioned. right now you disabled too many apparmor protections. you only wanted to disabled firefox, but you disabled dhclient, cups, tcpdump, ...13:48
jdstrandGreenery: the command I gave will enable everything again, then complain for firefox13:49
Greeneryok done13:49
jdstrandGreenery: we should have the apparmor fix for firefox 3.6 in the next daily, if your interested in testing it out tomorrow13:50
asacor in lucid tonight ;)13:53
* asac will throw the bomb in today -- almost official13:54
asactogether with chromium ;)13:54
asacbang!13:54
jdstrandasac: the apparmor profile, while disabled, is a supported feature for firefox in Ubuntu. I'd like to make sure that when you transition away that the new person (people) are testing firefox with the profile enabled before uploading (at least to Ubuntu, but preferably in the dailies too). what would be the best way to ensure that?13:55
BUGabundo_remoteautch13:55
asacfta2: is the package lintian clean?14:18
asacdo you have the warnings for the binary lintian check at hand ?14:18
jdstrandasac: so is /usr/lib/firefox*/firefox-bin the thing we want to protect? what is /usr/lib/firefox*/firefox?14:18
asacjdstrand: yes14:18
jdstrandah, it is a shell script14:18
asacah sorry didnt see the last question14:18
asacits a script14:18
asacyet another ;)14:19
jdstrandasac: and firefox-bin doesn't exist in 3.5?14:19
asacit doesnt exist for xulrunner builds14:19
asaconly for all-static14:19
jdstrandok cool14:19
BUGabundo_remoteasac: [reed]: FYI 3.6 seems to handle proxy auth much better, only one pop up :P #WIN14:19
jdstrandthen I can make that much cleaner14:19
asacBUGabundo_remote: great14:19
asacthere was a bug in ubuntu ... we should close it after upload14:19
asacjdstrand: much cleaner?14:20
BUGabundo_remoteyeah, hence the FYI :)14:20
jdstrandasac: the globbing14:20
asacjdstrand: e.g. no xulrunner access etc.?14:20
asachmm ok.14:20
asaci trust you  ;)14:20
jdstrandasac: the profile will need to be reworked for the xul changes, etc14:20
jdstrandit is going to get an overhaul for lucid anyway14:21
jdstrandbut not today14:21
jdstrandasac: so, with the static build, are you planning to be able to have 3.7 and 3.6 co-installable?14:21
jdstrand(like now)14:21
jdstrandasac: if so, /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox and '/usr/lib/firefox*/...' are too general14:22
jdstrand(/etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox is a conffile, so dpkg will barf, and even if you fix that, that specific globbing will cause problems)14:23
fta2asac, sorry, i'm busy with work, i can build it and give you the lintian traces (there are a few), it have that as part of my usual pbuilder setup14:38
mbanaanyone using the new firefox14:57
maxbHi. I'm using thunderbird 3 from the umd ppa, but find I'm missing enigmail (It needs a new version built to work with TB3).  Are there any existing packaged extensions for TB3 that might help me understand what a package of one is supposed to look like, such that I might attempt to update the enigmail package? Am I a fool to contemplate this with no prior experience of the mozilla buildsystem?14:57
jdstrandasac: well, I can see it is a problem-- I am going to adjust it so it use @APPNAME@-@APPVER@ for now15:10
jdstrandasac: that will make it so dailies are co-installable and the profiles will protect what they are intended to15:10
mbanaso i upgraded to 3.615:14
mbanathe font hinting is well off15:14
asacmbana: yes, I missed you so much ;)15:29
mbanalmfao15:29
mbana!15:29
asachttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54131915:30
ubottuMozilla bug 541319 in Graphics "Poor subpixel font rendering compared to rest of system in FF3.6 on Ubuntu" [Normal,New]15:30
joe_lI'm working on a package for seamonkey 2.0 and could use some help with the package name. Can someone help me?15:39
micahgjoe_l: what's the issue?15:40
micahgasac: were the merges into xul192 and ff36 ok?15:40
joe_lmorning micahg15:40
joe_lget-orig-source is working the way I expect, and I want to have release names and nightly names.15:41
joe_lI think I still have it wrong though.15:41
mbanay are u doing --disable-system-cairo15:41
mbanaid rather u use system cairo15:41
fta2asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360718/15:41
joe_lI don't know what cairo is. Once the package namd is fixed, we can add the proper config options.15:42
asacfta2: E: chromium-browser source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends: xbase-clients15:42
asacwhats that?15:42
asacjoe_l: start with the packaging branch we already have ;)15:43
mbanaasac: what do u propose15:45
asacmbana: CC yourself on the bug15:45
joe_lmicahg: I called the release package seamonkey-2.0_2.0.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~karmic and the nightly seamonkey-2.0_2.0.2~20100122r4747+nobinonly~karmic-0ubuntu215:46
micahgjoe_l: you can't official make a release package....15:47
micahgbut the nightly should probably be 2.0.2~hg20100122 like we do15:48
joe_lThis is why I'm asking for help. John told me to rename the package.15:48
* micahg is referring to branding15:48
asacmicahg: have a chance to test the upgrade again? ;)15:48
micahgasac: sure, in a little bit15:49
asacthanks a bunch15:49
micahgasac: what about my merge of kees patches15:49
asacmicahg: that looked ok15:49
micahgwas the merge comment on teh 2nd branch ok?15:49
micahgxul19215:49
asacif you want to try all the latest on karmic, i have uploaded the proposed final package to my sandbox ppa15:49
* asac guesses that that has finished15:50
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox15:50
asacwith official branding and so on15:50
asacso i used debhelper 7 and now i get build failures in hardy/intrepid15:50
* asac slaps his head15:50
fta2asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360724/15:51
fta2remember the backports15:52
micahgasac: did you merge the ff35 changelog?15:52
asacmicahg: no ;)15:53
asacdont remind me of such things :(15:54
micahgheh, I haven't figured out an easy way to do it yet, otherwise I would have when I cleaned up the changelog15:54
jcastroasac: http://blogs.computerworld.com/15443/talling_firefox_3_6_one_more_reason_linux_isnt_ready_for_the_prime_time_mass_market15:56
jcastroasac: some motivation! :p15:56
asacjcastro: strange point of view on it15:57
asacdo you know the author?15:57
asacor how to contact?15:57
jcastroI could contact if you'd like15:58
micahgasac: I did it a little better this time, I pinned your PPA and the security PPA to 50015:58
jcastroasac: it would be awesomer if we could just say "click upgrade, you're welcome!"15:58
micahgseems to want to upgrade all the right packages15:58
micahgshould I go for it?15:59
micahgI'll add instructions to the FIrefox Upgrade help page once we have the PPA packages in place for stable releases16:00
micahgjcastro: ^^16:00
micahgasac: should I upgrade?  it seems to want to upgrade the right packages16:01
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
jcastromicahg: sweet16:01
jcastroisn't it eventually going in -updates? I thought that's what the new spec was about?16:02
micahgjcastro: we created this yesterday: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable16:02
micahgjcastro: eventually16:02
micahgthe PPA is for the people who want cutting edge releases16:02
asacmicahg: yes16:02
micahg-updates needs more QA16:02
jcastroright16:02
micahgasac: upgrading :)16:03
jcastromicahg: that would be a nice thing to blog on planet like, today. The plan for 3.716:03
* jcastro points at asac16:03
micahgasac: FF seems big at 37MB16:03
jcastroer, 3.6 I mean. :)16:03
* micahg needs to make a blog...16:03
asacjcastro: i _will_ blog, but not _before_ the packages are there and confirmed to cause no major harm ;)16:03
BUGabundo_remotemicahg: is that the "semi-official" ppa with 3.6 final ?16:03
asacstill targetting to get the packages everywhere today16:04
micahgBUGabundo_remote: the link I just posted will be where the final version goes16:04
asacsame for the blog post16:04
asac;)16:04
micahgasac's PPA is where the almost final version is16:04
asacsandbox16:04
BUGabundo_remoteI don't want to advice ppl a not so final  PPA16:04
asachttps://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox16:04
BUGabundo_remoteasac one is not the best bet now16:04
asacBUGabundo_remote: point them to the firefox-stable16:05
BUGabundo_remoteppl are doing strange things16:05
asacand say that will get the stuff soon16:05
asace.g. without 12hours16:05
asacwithin16:05
BUGabundo_remoteI already commented in 2 blogs about not using mozilla binairies or other repos16:05
micahgasac: if it's uploaded to lucid by 9PM UTC, I can backport to PPA16:05
BUGabundo_remotethanks asac16:05
micahgasac: after that, you might have to do it if you need it done tonight  :)16:06
micahgasac: I assume we should use standard backport notation LUCID_VER~release1?  or would you prefer notation used in security PPA?16:06
micahgasac: I didn't get a notice to restart ff3.616:12
asacmicahg: yes.16:13
asac(re. version)16:13
asacbut no need to do release commits if its identical with the lucid version16:13
asacmicahg: oops16:13
asacmicahg please file a bug on the restart notification... thats ubufox bug16:13
asac;)16:13
micahgasac: no, that's a bug on the test:  pgrep -x firefox -U $(id -u)16:15
asacmicahg: thats the other restart notification16:15
asaci want to remove that16:15
asacubufox is the real restart notification where you can hit "restart"16:16
micahgasac: I thought it was based on that secondary notification?16:16
asacno16:16
asacthat pgrep thing is crap ;)16:17
micahgk16:17
asacredundant and painful ;)16:17
micahgI'll file  abug then16:17
* micahg needs to learn more about ubufox16:18
micahgbug 51125016:21
ubottuLaunchpad bug 511250 in ubufox "restart notification doesn't display on upgrade to all-in-one 3.6" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51125016:21
* micahg is restarting...let's see if I still have a browser ;)16:22
micahgasac: .desktop file still says alpha16:23
asactrue16:24
asacthanks16:24
micahgasac: looks good, version seems right16:25
micahgthey even fixes about:16:25
micahgfixed:16:25
micahgactually we might have done that with all-in-one16:25
* micahg goes to check 3.716:25
micahgnope, we did that :)16:25
asacfixes16:26
asacfixed16:26
asac(desktop)16:26
asacmicahg: can you try to install abrowser and see what happens?16:26
asacafter the upgrade is fine16:26
micahgasac: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/360746/16:28
micahgmaybe firefox-branding should replace the other 2?16:28
asacnot firefox-3.6-branding16:30
asacbut the other16:30
asacyes16:30
asacmaybe force16:31
asaci am more interested in if it starts etc. ;)16:31
micahgasac: why not ff36 branding?16:31
asachmm. will think about it16:32
asacmaybe you are right16:32
asacbut it was never in the archive16:33
micahgah, right16:34
micahgso, should I go through with the abrowser install?16:35
asac!test16:36
ubottuhrm?16:36
BUGabundo_remoteLOL16:36
micahgasac: so, should I go through with the abrowser install?16:37
micahgasac: no request to restart after installing abrowser either16:47
asacyes, same issue16:47
micahgasac: is it supposed to be firefox-bin running?16:48
micahgasac: no icon for abrowser16:48
BUGabundo_remotemicahg: ppa for thunderbird 3.0.1 ?16:48
micahgBUGabundo_remote: one problem at a time ;)16:48
BUGabundo_remoteok16:49
micahgBUGabundo_remote: hopefully early next week16:49
BUGabundo_remoteusers asking for it16:49
BUGabundo_remotewill reply so16:49
BUGabundo_remotethanks16:49
asacmicahg: no icon in the menu or on panel=16:49
asac?16:49
micahgnope16:49
asacneither?16:50
asacok16:50
asacmicahg: does it start etc.?16:50
asacand has abrowser branding?16:50
micahgasac: no .desktop file was installed16:50
asacthats supposed to be in abrowser-branding package fwiw16:50
micahghttp://pastebin.com/f54cc8a6216:50
asachmm16:51
asacmicahg: so if you start firefox it doesnt start?16:51
micahgno16:51
micahgXML parse error16:51
micahg abrowser16:52
micahgrun-mozilla.sh: Cannot execute /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/abrowser-bin.16:52
asachmm. me checks something16:52
asactoo bad .. dont have the build tree somwhat16:53
* asac spins16:53
anderskThe Smoothing control (None/Grayscale/Subpixel) and the Subpixel Order control (RGB/BGR/VRGB/VBGR) takes effect after a restart of Firefox (though in other applications it takes effect immediately).  The Hinting control (None/Slight/Medium/Full) does not take effect in Firefox.17:00
anderskNo, the upgrade didn’t go smoothly:17:02
andersk dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/firefox_3.6~hg20100120r33527+nob inonly-0ubuntu1~umd2_amd64.deb (--unpack):17:02
andersk  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/firefox-3.6pre/components/libnkgnomevfs.so', which is also in package firefox-3.6-gnome-support 0:3.6~hg20100117r33523+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd117:03
anderskBut I think I tried to upgrade at a time when not all the packages had been built yet.17:03
anderskI fixed things with aptitude manually.17:03
asacyeah17:05
asacthanks for the confirm on the hinting not working17:05
asacandersk: did you try the upgrad again today? that should be fixed17:06
anderskTrying now.17:09
maxbHi. I'm using thunderbird 3 from the umd ppa, but find I'm missing enigmail (It needs a new version built to work with TB3).  Are there any existing packaged extensions for TB3 that might help me understand what a package of one is supposed to look like, such that I might attempt to kludge together a buildable enigmail package for TB3? Am I a fool to contemplate this with no prior experience of the mozilla buildsystem?17:10
micahgmaxb: we need to work on the dev packages for tb317:12
micahgmaxb: 32 bit or 64 bit?17:12
maxb6417:12
micahgmaxb: out of luck at the moment17:12
maxbfair enough17:13
asacok17:13
micahglightning was published upstream 64 bit17:13
asacguess have to run out in a bit and finish all this heap of work then ;)17:13
micahgmaxb: do you want a link to 64 bit lightning?17:14
maxbupstream? not particularly. Anything you think might help me have a go at building enigmail 1.0? yes please.17:16
asacwe ned the -dev package first17:17
anderskI downgraded the firefox* and xulrunner* packages to lucid, then upgraded from the umd PPA.  Seemed to work.17:20
mahfouz1http://pastebin.com/m63c895b117:27
mahfouz1seems to be similat to andersk17:28
mahfouz1should I try to reinstall?17:28
asacmahfouz1: edit the apparmor profile17:39
asacmahfouz1: wait a day. its fixed17:40
asacuntil then you can set your apparmor profile to complain17:40
asacsudo aa-complain usr.bin.firefox17:40
asaci think17:40
asacaa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox17:40
asacactually17:40
asacmahfouz1: ^^17:40
mahfouz1oh17:53
mahfouz1apparmor ist way to rowdy17:53
mahfouz1but how can it happen? I had firefox-3.6 package running without problems before17:55
asacunless you want to become a devloper, explaining that is too much ;)17:56
asacits technical detail ;)17:56
asacits fixed however :)17:56
=== fta_ is now known as fta
asacit has to do with us renaming packegs, flipping from uxing xulrunner to all-static and so on :)17:57
mahfouz1you mean it's fixed but not in ppa yet?17:57
asacyes17:57
asacwe fixed it when it was first reported ... which was like 9 hours ago ;)17:57
mahfouz1ok thx17:58
ftaBUGabundo_remote, wrt logins, same answer as always, did you search for/file bugs?17:58
asacmahfouz1: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.6.head/revision/48617:58
asacthat the commit17:58
mbanaasac: do u think a fix will be available soon18:01
asaci dont think it will18:01
asacwe were asked for ages to use system-cairo ... so now we use it.18:02
asacand hope for upstream fixing it ;)18:02
asacerr ... to use in-source cairo that is18:02
mbanathat doesn't make no sense18:02
mbanausing system cairo18:02
gnomefreakasac: you know that firefox-3.6 cant be upgraded right?18:03
BUGabundo_remotefta: I did file for mozilla18:04
gnomefreakwell branding has unmet deps18:04
ftaBUGabundo_remote, didn't i already say that i'm no longer using ff anywhere?18:05
mbanawhat's a good site to arrange meetings for close friends.  i remember crossing one but i forgot the link18:06
asacgnomefreak: read irclogs ... i have to run18:06
gnomefreakasac: i cant read them i just got here but that means you know about it :)18:06
micahggnomefreak: what's the Q?18:09
micahgasac's sandbox ppa has the latest fixes18:09
micahghttps://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox/+packages18:09
gnomefreakmicahg: just ff-3.6-branding i just wanted to let him know if he didnt already18:09
micahgI managed to upgrade fine from his sandbox18:09
gnomefreakthanks18:09
micahgthere's one more fix not there18:10
micahgwhich he committed already18:10
BUGabundo_remotefta: if you read backlog, you will see reed said Ch uses the same code as FF18:10
ftaBUGabundo_remote, maybe, but if noone attracts the ch devs attention, nothing will happen18:12
gnomefreaki may be kicked off soon depending on a few things i killed but we shall see :)18:13
gnomefreakmicahg: the page doesnt show the repo to add to sources, is there a way to enable that view(those lines)18:21
micahggnomefreak: get rid of +packages18:22
gnomefreak?18:22
micahgin the URL18:22
gnomefreakoh ok18:23
gnomefreakthanks that did it18:23
gnomefreakmicahg: it doesnt fix the unmet deps for *branding18:31
* micahg didn't have the issue18:31
micahgare you trying abrowser?18:31
gnomefreakmicahg: no im using firefox now i used to use abrowser18:32
gnomefreakand now 3.6 wont open either looks like it wont open due to xulrunner18:32
micahggnomefreak: where you are installing from?18:33
gnomefreakmind you im using dailies18:33
gnomefreakterminal?18:33
micahgthat's broke18:33
micahgdailies are broke today18:33
gnomefreakoh great18:33
micahgyou need asac's version if you wnat to test the upgrade18:33
gnomefreakbe back18:33
micahgasac: why did you set the bug to invalild for firebug alpha for 3.6?  the upstream bug shows pushes on all branches18:36
asacmicahg: reed said it was never affected18:37
asaccheck with him18:37
asacotherwist its fix committed18:37
asacout18:37
asacbbi2h18:37
micahg[reed]: mozilla bug 510040 shows a push for 1.9.2 bug you said bug 449744 wasn't affected?18:38
ubottuMozilla bug 510040 in JavaScript Debugging APIs "Fix JS debugger crash on 64-bit: don't truncate PC to jsuint in jsds_FilterHook" [Minor,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51004018:38
ubottuLaunchpad bug 449744 in firefox/3.5 "Firefox crashes when attempting to load Firebug 1.5 alphas" [Undecided,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/44974418:38
[reed]micahg: 3.6 final is not affected18:39
[reed]yes, 1.9.2 was affected18:39
[reed]but it was fixed before 3.618:39
[reed]it was just confusing people to say 3.6 was affected18:40
[reed]since 3.6 final wasn't affected18:40
micahg[reed]: yes, that's right, but the fix for ubuntu is either in ff3.6 or ff3.5.818:40
micahgit's not saying it was affected18:40
micahgit's saying it was fixed18:40
micahgmilestone id 3.6 final18:41
micahg*is18:41
[reed]well, note that better somehow then?18:41
[reed]I just know it was confusing _Mozilla_ developers ;P18:41
micahgI fixed the statuses18:42
micahgfix released on 3.6 fix committed on 3.5.818:42
micahgand triaged in ubuntu18:42
micahg[reed]: they're working on importing bmo statuses18:42
micahgbut until then, I'm just adding release milestones18:43
micahgs/statuses/milestones/18:43
[reed]ok18:43
[reed]sounds good18:43
micahg[reed]: it's an easy way for me to know what bugs to close when we release into ubuntu18:44
[reed]ok18:44
micahg[reed]: it's actually a slight abuse of upstream milestones18:44
* micahg had bugs in LP filed18:44
micahgbug 494943 and bug 49494118:45
ubottuLaunchpad bug 494943 in malone "Launchpad should be aware of, and able to import, upstream milestones on remote bug trackers" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49494318:45
ubottuLaunchpad bug 494941 in malone "Users are offered a "Target to milestone" link for bug tasks with linked bug watches" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/49494118:45
gnomefreakjust my luck firefox-3.6 is broken using any version18:47
micahggnomefreak: wfm from asac's ppa18:47
gnomefreak3.6+lucid18:48
micahghttps://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox18:48
micahgah18:48
micahgyeah, sol until upload to archive18:48
gnomefreakmicahg: i have that repo enabled18:48
gnomefreakmicahg: k18:48
* micahg thnks18:48
micahgi just tested karmic18:48
gnomefreaknp18:48
micahghe didn't spin the final tarball for lucid18:49
micahggnomefreak: you could probably copy the karmic firefox page from his sandbox to your ppa's lucid pocket18:49
micahgs/page/package18:49
micahgbbiab2h18:49
gnomefreakmicahg: when will it be fixed/uploaded?18:50
micahggnomefreak: hopefully later tonight I think18:50
micahgidk18:50
gnomefreakplanned18:50
micahgasac will be back in about 2hrs18:50
gnomefreakmicahg: k18:50
* micahg is away18:50
* gnomefreak hopfully wont be here than ;)18:50
blaamannHi, I cannot launch firefox-3.6.1. I got an error about missing libxul.so. More info with: ldd firefox-bin | grep xul libxul.so => not found . Last I got it to launch when 'export LD_BIND_NOW=1' before launching firefox from /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.1pre19:24
gnomefreakblaamann: from daily repo?19:26
blaamanngnomefreak: Yes from PPA in Karmic.19:26
blaamannLet me check again.19:26
blaamanngnomefreak: http://pastebin.org/8046319:30
blaamanngnomefreak: http://pastebin.org/8046419:31
gnomefreakblaamann: can you give the line that says installed when using apt-cache policy19:31
gnomefreakblaamann: did you run it as root (sudo/su)?19:32
gnomefreakblaamann: maybe try a new profile. I do know that daily builds are broken for Lucid not sure about karmic19:33
gnomefreakbe back smoke19:33
blaamanngnomefreak: No as a 'normal' user.19:33
=== cyphermo1 is now known as cyphermox
blaamanngnomefreak: http://pastebin.org/8046719:34
gnomefreaklooking19:37
gnomefreakthat looks like asac's sandbox PPA19:38
blaamanngnomefreak: This is how I run it http://pastebin.org/8048819:40
blaamannfrom line 619:40
gnomefreakwe have to get you a new pastebin site ;)19:41
blaamannit sucks?19:41
gnomefreakblaamann: pop-ups everytime it is opened. 3.7 isnt blocking them but says it is. not sure any other version firefox blocks or not19:42
* gnomefreak wondersing why you are trying to run a version other than the one installed19:42
gnomefreaks/wondersing/wondering19:43
gnomefreak3.6.1pre/ doesnt match the version from policy19:43
gnomefreakoh and when running apt-cache* you dont need sudo19:44
gnomefreakrun apt-cache policy firefox-3.6 from your home dir19:45
blaamannhttp://dpaste.com/149154/19:45
blaamannBetter pastebin? ;-)19:45
gnomefreakblaamann: yes much better ;)19:46
gnomefreakwhy is it trying to run the daily version when the stable version is installed19:46
gnomefreakthat is at least 1 of the issues i see without diggging deep into it19:47
gnomefreakblaamann: you may want to wait for asac/micah to get back and see if they can help more. they both work on firefox daily19:48
blaamanngnomefreak: Thanks, I might hang around for a while (gf tends to shut of my computer).19:49
* gnomefreak had same issue until i talked to her seeing as together we have 6 PCs atm19:50
gnomefreak!info firefox-3.5 hardy20:11
ubottuPackage firefox-3.5 does not exist in hardy20:11
gnomefreak!info firefox-3.0 hardy20:12
ubottufirefox-3.0 (source: firefox-3.0): safe and easy web browser from Mozilla. In component main, is optional. Version 3.0.17+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.04.1 (hardy), package size 1046 kB, installed size 3584 kB20:12
gnomefreakone of these days ill get caught up on emails20:30
Aethelredno, you won't20:31
Aethelredwell, if you re-define what "caught up" means, then you have a shot.20:31
asacblaamann: run sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox20:46
asacand wait till tomorrow20:46
asacthat will fix it20:46
asacfta: maybe we can kick off a new firefox daily run?20:46
asachave the feeling lots of folks end up with that issue20:47
asac3.620:47
asaconly20:47
ftaasac, done20:54
blaamannasac: Ok, I will wait till tomorrow.20:57
* gnomefreak tried using sandbox build but still borked :)20:57
gnomefreaki guess i should try another key20:58
asacblaamann: you can downgrade to the sandbox biuld21:00
gnomefreak^^^21:01
asacgnomefreak: if you upgraded to dailies then sandbox version will be lower21:01
asacso you need to downgrade21:01
gnomefreakasac: Installed: 3.6+lucid21:01
asacgnomefreak: thats the fake transition21:02
asacfirefox21:02
gnomefreaki downgraded a couple hours a go21:02
asacis the package name21:02
gnomefreakhuh? it is installed as firefox-3.621:02
asacthats the fake transition package as i said21:02
gnomefreakunder firefox package i have Installed: 3.5.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu121:02
asacthats empty now21:03
asacok21:03
asacthat sounds right21:03
gnomefreakwhat package than?21:03
asacdo you have firefox-branding?21:03
asacor abrowser-branding?21:03
gnomefreakno branding21:04
gnomefreakfirefox not abrowser21:04
asacyou dont have firefox-branding package?21:04
asacoh21:04
gnomefreakhold that thought. no but when i downgraded it said i had it trying now21:05
asacwell you really have the wrong versions21:05
gnomefreakcant install it still21:05
asacyou need firefox and firefox-branding and firefox-gnome-support packages from sandbox21:05
gnomefreakfirefox-3.6-branding: Depends: firefox-branding but it is not installable21:05
asactry installing it directly21:05
gnomefreakso i have to uninstall "firefox" version now? 3.7*21:06
asacgo back one step: paste dpkg -l firefox\*21:06
asacCOLUMND=200 dpkg -l firefox\*21:06
asacactually21:06
gnomefreakasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360877/21:08
asacgnomefreak: apt-cache policy firefox21:09
gnomefreakasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360878/21:10
gnomefreakinstalling firefox-3.6 installs the transitional-special? maybe i should install it directly from PPA?21:12
gnomefreak3.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~asac1 should be the package i need right?21:14
asacgnomefreak: yes21:14
gnomefreakok will try it21:14
asacyou dont have my apt lines in there ;)21:14
asacadd the sandbox ppa ;)21:14
gnomefreakyes i do21:14
gnomefreakasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360879/21:15
gnomefreakdownloading from PPA and install using dpkg21:17
gnomefreakasac: i have to remove 3.5 first?21:18
asacno21:19
asacthat should work21:19
asacgnomefreak: heh21:19
asaci have no lucid packages in sandbox ;)21:20
asacso stick to daily21:20
asacand fix apparmore if you have issues till tomorrow21:20
gnomefreakasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360884/21:20
gnomefreakjamie pushed that fix i thought21:20
* gnomefreak will wait til tomorrow assuming you are working tomorrow21:22
asacgnomefreak: i am not working tomorrow21:22
asacat least officially21:22
asaci would really hope to just turn the computer off for a day ;) ... for once21:23
gnomefreakasac: you going to push the updated version?21:23
asacgnomefreak: just enable dailies and run dist-upgrade ;)21:23
asacthat should really really work :)21:23
gnomefreaknot tonight right21:23
asaci have to run a couple tests on it, but yes.21:23
asactrying to upload tonight!!!!!21:23
gnomefreak;)21:23
asacbecause i dont want to work tomorrow :-P21:23
* gnomefreak /away for a bit21:27
=== gandi_ is now known as gandi
asacccheney: there? so there is some .so shipped for arm in ooo that is coming from jaunty21:32
asaccan you confirm that?21:32
asacwhich so is that?21:32
asacccheney: help ;) plzzz21:33
asac:-P21:33
ccheneyasac: its something that doko fixed up so that it would work on arkm21:34
ccheneyer arm21:34
* ccheney looks at the source to see if he can see why21:34
asacright21:34
asacwhat file is that?21:34
asaclibpyuno.so?21:34
asacor pyuno.so :-P?21:34
ccheneylibgcc3_uno.so.jaunty21:35
asachmm21:35
asacccheney: where is that shipped?21:35
asace.g. in what dir?21:36
ccheneyin ure21:36
ccheneyusr/lib/ure/lib/21:36
asacure?21:36
asacwhats that21:36
ccheneyUno Runtime Environment21:36
ccheneydpkg -p ure :)21:36
ccheneyiirc it does a shim from java to c++ or something like that21:37
ccheneyasac: do you happen to know if the OOo 3.2 test build worked for doko? i forgot to ask him today before he got off work21:38
asacccheney: unfortunately cant remember exactly21:41
asacdidnt he paste something?21:41
asac14:34 < doko> asac, ccheney: ARM patches for OOo updated, the URL for the ooo-build repo is wrong. Vcs-Git: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/ooo-build/ooo-build21:41
micahgasac: so, do you need anything else from me today?21:44
asacmicahg: if you want to cleanup the changelog ... add bugs etc. ;)21:44
asac?21:44
ccheneyasac: ah ok21:45
micahgasac: I thought I already did...21:45
ccheneyasac: my client didn't highlight it21:45
asacccheney: or you missed it ... like i miss a bunch ;)21:46
micahgasac: bugs already closed at the top of the changelof21:46
ccheneyasac: yea even lastlog can't find it for some reason21:47
* ccheney wonders where he put the updated arm patch21:48
ccheneyits not in git afaict21:49
BUGabundoasac: should I purge what ever is left of 3.5 from my system ?21:51
asacBUGabundo: sure thats a transitional package now21:51
asacupdate-manager is supposed to remove it on dist-upgrade21:51
* gnomefreak removed 3.5 to install 3.6's fx21:51
asacccheney: he said in bzr21:51
* ccheney emailed doko to find out details21:52
ccheneyoh21:52
asacccheney: the git branch was a second thing: read what he wrote ;)21:52
gnomefreakasac: is the version in your sandbox greater than UMD?21:52
BUGabundoasac: I only use aptitude safe-upgrade/full-upgrade21:52
ccheneyasac: ah i assumed he meant a new arm patch for the ooo-build/patches/dev300/ directory21:52
asacgnomefreak: no. but since you are a daily user you will only get a smooth upgrade with daily enabled21:52
BUGabundoGet:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main firefox-3.5 3.6.1~hg20100122r33533+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 [72.6kB]21:52
ccheneyasac: we already had several in there, heh21:52
BUGabundoits still pulling FF 3.5 packages :D21:52
asace.g. i dont provide clean upgrades for users of firefox-3.621:53
ftajcastro, my vdpau is once again broken, what about yours?21:53
asacin the archive ... i assume they can run dailies for another few days21:53
ccheneygrr my bzr apparently wasn't setup on my chroot properly21:53
gnomefreaksince ff3.5 was blocking my 3.6 install i removed both and installed 3.6 clean from your sandbox using dpkg21:53
gnomefreaklast i heard umd 3.6 is broken21:54
jcastrofta: I am afraid to log out21:54
gnomefreakits not opening :(21:54
jcastrofta: yeah it is.21:55
asacwhat is vdpau?21:55
asaca failed voodoo clone?21:55
jcastrofta: it works but clearly not offloading to the gpu21:55
ftajcastro, i didn't, but i've got a new nvidia-current, and more errors21:55
gnomefreakwell that version of 3.6 is broken too21:55
jcastroasac: it offloads video to the gpu21:55
ccheneyasac: actually the patches themselves aren't in bzr but some of his changes are in there (eg changelog, etc)21:55
asacoh no. thats not fun. my gpu should stay idle ;)21:55
BUGabundoasac: LOLOL21:55
ftajcastro, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360896/21:56
asacmaybe i will need it at some point ... *cough*21:56
gnomefreakah same problem as blaamann21:56
jcastroasac: if you have a crap cpu then it's handy ... for things like netbooks21:56
asacfta: can you kick off a firefox 3.6 now?21:56
asac;)21:56
asaci cant answer the aa-complain thing anymore21:56
asac;)21:56
ftaasac, again?21:56
asacfta: oh. when did you do it?21:56
asacif you already pushed one after i asked then its fine i guess21:56
* asac checks21:56
fta[21:54] <fta> asac, done21:56
gnomefreakasac: did you fix blaamann's permission issues on 3.6?21:57
* ccheney hopes to get a new OOo upload maybe tomorrow :)21:57
=== asac changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | Please help Mozilla QA tracker: http://tinyurl.com/6yo6g7 | Next meeting TBA, if you would like add a topic for the next meeting please add it to the agenda. The agenda is available at: http://tinyurl.com/2ekzoq. | ffox 3.6 dailies dont start? run sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox ... real fix will be available on sat
asacgnomefreak: ^^21:58
gnomefreakthanks21:58
=== asac changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | Please help Mozilla QA tracker: http://tinyurl.com/6yo6g7 | Next meeting TBA, if you would like add a topic for the next meeting please add it to the agenda. The agenda is available at: http://tinyurl.com/2ekzoq. | ffox 3.6 dailies dont start? run "sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox"
asacfta: kk21:59
micahgasac: I'll plan on working on tb3 sat night if I don't see it done, also, I'll plan on backporting to firefox-stable from Lucid if I don't see it done21:59
asacgnomefreak: or wait another hour till next ffox 3.6 is in daily ;)21:59
gnomefreakah its apparmor21:59
asacmicahg: yes.21:59
asacmicahg: focus on tb321:59
asacffox will get done ;)21:59
asacplace your bets :-P21:59
micahgk, backport will take 5 min ;)22:00
asacalso chromium will be in NEW22:00
asacbetandwin ;)22:00
blaamanngnomefreak: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/01/fix-firefox-36-from-mozilla-daily-ppa.html22:00
asacmicahg: right. but 5 minutes is a lot here ;)22:00
gnomefreakwell it didnt fix mine i dont think22:00
micahgasac: I should be back online around midnight UTC Sunday22:01
asacblaamann: its already uploaded: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa22:01
asacwaiting for a build slot22:01
asacbut thanks for the post22:02
asacmicahg: ok lets talk then22:02
* asac takes a break before the final round :-P22:02
asacccheney: can you try to not ship this bad gcc uno thing?22:04
asacdo you know if that was tried in lucid again?22:04
ccheneyasac: i have no idea if it has been tried again, doko did the arm building and created the initial hack to have it included22:07
ccheneyfrom what i can gather the toolchain is just as broken in lucid as it was in karmic though22:08
asachmm.22:08
asacthat isnt really the thing i wanted to hear22:08
asacccheney: do we need libgcc3_uno in ooo at all ;)22:09
asacstupid question i guess22:09
ccheneythe arm patch doko was fixing up yesterday was related to gcc not working in Os mode (aiui)22:09
ccheneyyes we need it as much as we need gcc on arm to begin with, heh22:09
ccheneydebian has just disabled OOo on arm altogether22:09
ftajcastro, updated the bug22:10
asacccheney: yea. unfortunately we wont be there this cycle22:13
asacbut we will kick it off default install i hope ;)22:13
asacfor arm22:13
asacits just a nasty beast22:13
gnomefreakmicahg: i fixed my ssh key and getting source now i will look at it and build it. do we really want to use the script for final release in Lucid?22:21
gnomefreak+ rel=seamonkey-2.0_2.0.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~joe1~karmic  bothers me when running ./debian/rules....orig22:22
gnomefreakim hoping that is not name of final tarball22:23
joe_lgnomefreak,: hi22:23
gnomefreakhi joe_l :)22:23
gnomefreakok is that the name of final tarball?22:23
joe_lI agree, that was just a recommendation from micah and would need to be fixed22:23
micahggnomefreak: we generate all tarballs with get-orig-source now22:24
gnomefreakok thats not a problem. I will build for Lucid and push to my PPA in the next few days22:24
gnomefreakmicahg: yep22:24
micahggnomefreak: we should probably review before it's pushed it lucid22:24
joe_lI through a few hacks that would make it easy to test my builds for right now.22:24
gnomefreaki just got your email22:25
joe_lagree, it needs review22:25
gnomefreakwell so far it looks like its grabbing the right one but i will let you know if it ever finishes22:25
joe_lIt seems as I was missing how hg checks out code. I thought I could use hg up TAG22:25
micahgk, I'm off, I'll be back around UTC 0:00 on Sunday..have a good night everyone22:27
gnomefreakoh micahg asac i found an extension i would like to add however i need to hear back from author to see if he will make a Linux version22:27
gnomefreaknight micahg22:27
joe_lit looks like the pyton client.py checkout needs the comm-rev option as well22:27
joe_lnight micahg22:27
joe_lmicahg: thanks for all the help.22:28
gnomefreakok who is monkey?22:29
asacnot me ;)22:29
mbanai wish someone fixed this font issue22:29
asacnot sure what that means ... must be slang22:29
asacmbana: i think until that happens we should ensure we get you a bot to post that message ;)22:30
asacevery 4 hours22:30
asacor so22:30
asac:-P22:30
asacmbana: cant you workaround with fontconfig?22:30
asacafaik fontconfig still works somewhat22:31
asacjust not the gnome setting part for hinting/antialiasing22:31
mbanaim using fontconfig22:31
mbanait's ignored :(22:31
gnomefreakI found this in Ubuntuzilla today:22:31
gnomefreakim hating that more and more22:32
mbanais urs working22:32
asacmbana: would you be willing to loose everything if there is a chance that fonts might improve?22:34
asac:-P22:34
mbanaha22:34
asacworst case you have to fix things on console i guess ;)22:35
asacso i have22:35
asacls -l /usr/lib/libcairo.so*22:35
asaclrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     21 2009-06-25 22:57 /usr/lib/libcairo.so -> libcairo.so.2.10800.822:35
asaclrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     21 2009-06-25 22:57 /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 -> libcairo.so.2.10800.822:35
asac-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 547284 2009-06-24 21:56 /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2.10800.822:35
asacyou probably have something similar22:35
asacidea is to move the /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2.10800.8 away22:35
asacand create a link to the libcairo.so shipped by ffox instead22:35
asacmove the other file to a backup location so you can put it back in case everything goes crazy ;)22:36
asacif you are brave enough ... i would be interested about it ;)22:36
asacok i am in busy mode now ... finishing stuff22:37
=== heikki_ is now known as heikki
gnomefreakif he is going to keep doing bugs he needs to stop changing status to new22:41
=== gandi_ is now known as gandi
asacok i think i found the abrowser issue22:43
* gnomefreak emailed monkey lets see what happens22:47
asacso monkey is active on bugs?22:48
asacgood22:48
asac;)22:48
asacget him join this channel :-P22:48
gnomefreakoh not sure about that :)22:49
gnomefreakim tired of going behind he22:49
gnomefreakhim22:49
gnomefreakasac: what are we doing with 3.0 -> 3.6?22:49
asacwe are doing it ;)22:49
gnomefreakhardy22:49
asacyes.22:49
asacwe are doing it there22:49
asacbut not before 3.0 goes EOL upstream22:49
gnomefreakok22:49
asacuntil then we spend time on getting that tested and stuff22:50
asacand backporting things like extensions and so on22:50
gnomefreakright. well dec should have been it but they wanted to roll .18 out but there was a mail about this on mailing list today22:50
asacgnomefreak: url?22:51
gnomefreakasac: dont recall let me see if i still have it. it was on mailing list22:51
gnomefreakasac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360914/22:54
gnomefreaki ant find link to the full topic22:55
gnomefreakok i have tarball so i can work on it in a few days or this weekend if i get time23:00
gnomefreakasac: bug 511019  what should we do with it. i dont think its firefox but ill let you decide23:01
ubottuLaunchpad bug 511019 in firefox-3.5 "Neither Sun Java Plugin or Iced Tea Java plugin works - 3.5.8pre and 3.6pre" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/51101923:01
asacfta: is it understood in any way how produce beta tarballs?23:01
asacfor chromium?23:01
asacbeta and dev23:01
asacchromium-browser$ cat debian/README.source | pastebinit23:01
asachttp://pastebin.com/f77c10ed323:01
asacfta: ^^23:01
asaci would like to add info how to get latest dev ... and latest beta there too23:01
asac(only current/latest snapshot are included)23:02
ftajust CHANNEL={beta,dev}23:03
ftaasac, ^^ or even CHANNEL=1.2.3.423:05
asacfta: http://pastebin.com/f144c7fab23:05
asacthats with LOCAL_BRANCH23:05
asacis it fixed to auto create the folder on first run?23:05
asacok let me add channels23:06
ftathere were never any issue with LOCAL_BRANCH in chromium, the bug is in mozclient23:07
asacfta: get-current-source will just work (TM) ... even for stuff produced from channels?23:07
asacah ok23:07
ftahm, not sure23:07
ftayou need to test :)23:07
ftajcastro, wow, i have a lamp on my desk, i was watching a movie, i turned the lamp on, got gliches in the video, hmm, i turned it off to check if it was related, boom, X crashed. sounds like a vdpau craziness23:16
gnomefreakok how do i get bzr to use nano instead of vim? nano is my default editor23:16
asacfta: http://pastebin.com/f429b20ae23:18
* gnomefreak going to bed ill be back tomorrow23:18
ftaasac, nice23:20
asacgood. i think i will go for that23:20
asacwonder if i need to ship that explicitly23:20
ftaasac, not if you call it README.Debian23:23
ftaor list it in debian/chromium-browser.docs23:23
ftaasac, btw, you call use lp:chromium-browser23:25
fta-call+can23:25
asacok guess needs listing if thats supposed to be shipped23:29
asac;)23:29
ftaREADME.Debian is auto installed as a doc23:34
ftasee man dh_installdocs23:34
asacthx for checking23:36
asaci want README.source though23:36
asacthats debian policy thing it seems :)23:36
asacfta: so i am going for  ../builds/chromium-browser-4.0.305.0~svn20100122r3686223:38
asacactually... why dont you make the release and do the upload?23:38
asacyour line is so much faster :)23:39
asaci assume the latest dailies didnt break?23:39
ftai'm running it23:39
asacgood ... what bzr revision got into those?23:39
fta43523:40
ftanothing from today23:40
ftawell, 4am23:41
asachmm23:41
asacwow so i did 28 commits or so :)23:41
asachehe23:41
asacmaybe i should work in larger chunks23:41
ftaasac, do you need to refresh the copyright file?23:46
asacfta: i dont think so23:46
asacis the MS-Pl thing still in problems?23:46
asacif not it should be fine23:46
asacor anything else with a license?23:46
ftawhat was the problem?23:47
asacwell i really would like to know:23:47
asacsrc/chrome/test/data/layout_tests/LayoutTests/http/tests/xmlhttprequest/resources/23:47
asacfta: the .problems file i ment23:47
asaci had to wipe wtl headers (windows only confirmed in #chromium)23:47
asacbecause those had a microsoft license not compatible with GPL23:47
asaclast commit should be against such a new tarball23:48
asacanyway ... just checked. its fine23:48
asacif you can find the licens for those tests i would be happy to whitelist that23:48
asacsame for src/sandbox/linux/seccomp/23:48
asacbut i thinkwe talked about that before23:48
asacfta: oh23:49
asacrc/third_party/gles2_book/23:49
asacthat reappeared :(23:49
ftawhat is that? doesn't ring a bell23:50
asacok removing that too in strip23:50
asacthats bad23:50
asacthere are example files and pdfs with unknown origin nor license23:50
asacmost likely proprietar23:50
asace.g. a book23:50
asacwith example code etc.23:50
asacseems we removed gles2_book_examples23:51
asacbut not the gles2_book23:51
asacdoing that now23:51
ftawhat is copyright.overlay needed for?23:51
asacfta: thats dead23:51
asaci commiteed the gles_book strip ... can you remove that and then produce23:52
asacthe tarball and run one more time licensecheck.pl and copy the debian/copyright* files to the bzr tree etc. ;)23:52
asac?23:52
asace.g. update copyrights after new tarball23:52
asacwith that we are done and lets push23:53
asacand hope ;)23:53
ftai should at least build it23:53
asacright23:53
asac;)23:53
asacone try iwth all the crap i did23:53
asacmaybe we should include the GPL things in .problems23:54
asaclet me check how that owuld look like23:54
ftaplz kill copyright.overlay23:54
asacoh ... run sh debian/licensegen.sh to update the copyrights on an unpacked build tree23:55
asacsorry23:55
asacyes killing23:55
ccheneyso i hear that firefox will finally be able to isolate flash crashes in some 3.6 update23:57
ccheneynext step after that is to just kill of flash altogether23:58
ftaasac, ./debian/rules:58: unsupported target arch  - continuing anyway ???23:58
ccheneys/of/off/23:58
ccheneyflash just crashed my 3.5.723:58
asacouch23:58
asacdid i commit something there?23:58
asachmm23:58
asacfta: the check is wrong :)23:58
asacx8623:58
asacifeq (x86,$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU))23:59
asacGYP_DEFINES += target_arch=ia3223:59
asacelse23:59
asacwe should really move that to BUILD_CPU23:59
ftano it's fine, but when doing g-o-s, none of those vars are set23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!