[00:00] <mahfouz> i guess lucid will have 3.6 not 3.7
[00:00] <micahg> like if there's a major update by mozilla PPA might get it and archive might not for weeks/months
[00:00] <asac> but for now it definitly is ;)
[00:02] <micahg> asac: so, what should the PPA name be?
[00:02] <micahg> and where?
[00:07] <asac> micahg: i think firefox-stable
[00:07] <asac> fta didnt vote?
[00:07] <micahg> asac: under ~mozillateam?
[00:08] <asac> micahg: created https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable
[00:09] <fta> if it's manual, i don't mind where. but ~mozillateam has been a kitchen sink for a long time, bad idea.
[00:09] <asac> so thats it ;)
[00:09] <micahg> asac: k
[00:09] <micahg> as soon as it hits lucid, I'll backport
[00:09] <asac> fta: we have a new name, so the ppa can stay random crack ;)
[00:10]  * micahg will delete his own ff-stable PPA :)
[00:10] <micahg> asac: can we do thunderbird-stable as well?
[00:12] <asac> micahg: lets first get firefox-stable flying
[00:12] <micahg> asac: k ;)
[00:13] <asac> for tbird we first have to finish the package rename and the upload to lucid
[00:13] <micahg> asac: k, you doing that or should I try again?
[00:20] <asac> micahg: give it a try again. i will hav eto do it over weekend if you fail ;)
[00:22] <fta> ok, i'm off. 'night all
[00:25] <asac> night fta
[00:29] <micahg> asac: k
[00:30] <micahg> if I don't finish by Sun morning I'll let you know asac
[00:30] <asac> micahg: guess on sat nothing will happen, so let me know friday night :)
[00:31] <micahg> asac: I was going to do most of the work sat night :)
[00:31] <asac> hmm
[00:31] <asac> if i start before ill let you know
[00:31] <micahg> tonight I have to finish up this work project
[00:31] <asac> so ok
[00:31] <micahg> k
[00:32]  * asac has to leave the party too ... early appointment tomorrow
[00:50] <ccheney> asac: hmm don't know about gcc-uno
[03:33] <LLStarks> hey asac. will there now be a 3.8/4.0 mercurial trunk?
[04:36] <ejat> anyone having this with latest chromium ?
[04:36] <ejat> Your profile could not be opened correctly.
[04:36] <ejat> Some features may be unavailable.  Please check that the profile exists and you have permission to read and write its contents.
[05:06] <micahg> asac: you're not up, are you?
[05:30] <micahg> asac: nm
[05:33] <ccheney> asac: the new diff is under my incoming dir on chinstrap
[05:51] <RAOF> I've just been made aware of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Specs/Lucid/FirefoxNewSupportModel ; I see that we're going to drop support for packages using xulrunner.
[05:52] <micahg> RAOF: he's not around...
[05:54] <RAOF> micahg: asac's the only one who'll be interested in that?
[05:58] <micahg> RAOF: interested?  he'll be the only one to answer you about plans :)
[06:03] <RAOF> Ah, ok.
[06:03] <RAOF> I was just going to suggest that we might need to port gnome-shell to seed rather than gjs if mozilla libraries are going away.
[06:04] <micahg> RAOF: probably not a bad idea, but you can check with him, usually back around 9 or 10 UTC
[07:58] <EruditeHermit> hey, is there a firefox-3.6 package for karmic that replaces the default firefox?
[08:00] <EruditeHermit> the ppas seem to only install it as namoroka
[08:01] <kbrosnan> not at this time
[08:10] <asac> moin moin
[08:12] <andersk> It looks like firefox 3.6 in the ubuntu-mozilla-daily PPA recently started configuring itself with --disable-system-cairo, which makes subpixel fonts look poor.  Where’s the right place to report this?
[08:15] <asac> andersk: here
[08:15] <asac> and upstrem
[08:16] <asac> though i doubt that we will see a fix for this ;)
[08:16] <asac> upstream wants us to use in-source cairo (like verything else)
[08:16] <andersk> Ew.
[08:16] <asac> and the in-source cairo has problem to talk to the system cairo used gtk
[08:16] <asac> ;)
[08:16] <asac> i investigated once ... it was bad for in-source cairo. yes
[08:17] <asac> andersk: please file a bug upstream though
[08:17] <asac> its important to get filed
[08:17] <RAOF> asac: Regarding the dropping of xulrunner to universe, has any thought been given to gnome-shell at this point?
[08:18] <andersk> Okay.  Is there context I can link to that shows where upstream asked for in-source cairo?  (which justifies this as an upstream bug)
[08:18] <asac> andersk: no. file the bug without that comment
[08:32] <asac> andersk: all bugs are upstream ;) ... no need for justification
[08:33] <asac> you could confirm that ubuntu uses in-source cairo now ... so they dont start saying its our cairo
[08:33] <asac> RAOF: gnome-shell needs to go somewhere else. in general we dont allow libmozjs consumers in main
[08:34] <asac> as there are no ABI/API guarantees upstream
[08:34] <asac> (for security updates that is)
[08:34] <asac> afaik, it makes progress on that
[08:34] <asac> i will check
[08:34] <asac> once seb is online
[08:38] <andersk> Yeah, I checked the build log to verify that the ubuntu-mozilla-daily package is built with --disable-system-cairo.
[08:38] <andersk> and about:buildconfig
[08:38] <andersk> I submitted https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541319
[08:40] <kbrosnan> please make sure that you are not hitting the following https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458612
[08:41] <andersk> I don’t think so, my /etc/fonts/conf.d/11-lcd-filter-lcddefault.conf assigns lcdfilter=lcddefault to all fonts systemwide.
[08:42] <andersk> And I use several non-GNOME applications that look fine (e.g. drscheme, gitk).  Not to mention Firefox itself until today.
[08:48] <andersk> This was previously fixed as https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/164640 (with the fix being to start using system cairo).
[08:55] <RAOF> asac: gnome-shell could be ported to seed relatively painlessly I believe.
[08:57] <BUGabundo_remote> yawn o/
[08:57] <asac> RAOF: right. and i thought that was already ongoing (and also discussed upstream)
[08:58] <asac> andersk: can you do me a favour and check whether chaning the subpixel rendering type in the gnome settings changes anything at all?
[08:58] <asac> same for hinting style
[08:58] <asac> does that make any difference if you change something there
[08:59] <asac> andersk: did you upgrade dailies today? did that went smooth?
[08:59] <asac> packaging wise
[09:05] <AnAnt> Hello
[09:05] <AnAnt> asac: so xulrunner won't be removed ?
[09:07] <asac> TBD
[09:07] <asac> i guess we wont be able to get rid of it completely
[09:10] <[reed]> asac: cairo issues aren't gtk widget.... they go in Core :: Graphics
[09:11] <[reed]> fyi for future :)
[09:11] <asac> [reed]: early in the morning. i didnt even spot that entry ;)
[09:11] <asac> i scrolled a few times up and down and knew it was wrong somewhat
[09:11] <AnAnt> asac: so, will it be sync'ed from Debian ?
[09:12] <AnAnt> asac: Debian have added a debhelper script in xulrunner
[09:12] <asac> we have that too afaik
[09:12] <asac> and for now we wont sync
[09:13] <asac> maybe next cycle
[09:13] <asac> depends on a few things
[09:33] <AnAnt> ok, thanks
[09:38] <White_Sloun> hi, I get a little bug in firefox-3.6 installing from PPA http://pastebin.com/f45d7c4b0
[09:38] <White_Sloun> I use ubuntu 9.04
[09:52] <asac> let me check
[09:52] <asac> White_Sloun: can you stay here for a few more hours? we have to wait for jdstrand for that
[09:52] <asac> he is in US and will probably wake up a bit later
[09:52] <asac> most likely we need to not do apparmore on jaunty
[09:53] <asac> White_Sloun: those odd characters in the paste .. whast that?
[09:53] <White_Sloun> this is bad encoding for words in russian )
[09:54] <asac> ah ;)
[09:56] <White_Sloun> I will wait here for 2 hours, maybe more, for contact mail to segooon@gmail.com
[09:56] <asac> thanks
[10:38] <Greenery> i can't run firefox 3.6. Gtting this error: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360570/
[10:39] <asac> nmm
[10:39] <asac> Greenery: dpkg -l firefox\* please
[10:40] <Greenery> http://paste.ubuntu.com/360575/
[10:41] <asac> hmm
[10:41] <asac> Greenery: dpkg -L firefox please
[10:42] <Greenery> http://paste.ubuntu.com/360577/
[10:43] <asac> hmm
[10:43] <asac> Greenery: run strace -f -eopen firefox 2>&1 | tee /tmp/out.log.txt
[10:43] <asac> and after it failed:
[10:43] <asac> post the out.log.txt
[10:44] <asac> /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.1pre/firefox: 59: dirname: Permission denied feels odd
[10:44] <asac> Greenery: do you have apparmor profile enabled?
[10:44] <Greenery> i've never used apparmor
[10:44] <Greenery> i can't run the command you've just given me
[10:45] <asac> why?
[10:45] <Greenery> o wait nvm
[10:45] <Greenery> >.<
[10:45] <asac> what happens?
[10:45] <asac> ok
[10:46] <Greenery> http://paste.ubuntu.com/360580/
[10:47] <asac> Greenery: please post your dmesg output too
[10:49] <Greenery> http://paste.ubuntu.com/360582/
[10:59] <asac> Greenery: yes, your apparmor profile is enabled it seems
[10:59] <Greenery> oh okay, how do i disable it?
[11:00] <Greenery> or can firefox work with apparmor enabled?
[11:00] <asac> its supposed to work, but seems its buggy after the package rework
[11:01] <asac> Greenery: try to run aa-complain /usr/bin/firefox
[11:01] <asac> check if you have /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox afterwards
[11:01] <asac> jdstrand: ^^
[11:02] <asac> i think we need to work a bit on aa rules
[11:02] <Greenery> ok it is available on that directory
[11:03] <asac> doesnt help?
[11:04] <Greenery> still can't open it
[11:05] <asac> wait for jdstrand
[11:05] <asac> he probably will be here in a bit
[11:05] <asac> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/AppArmor
[11:05] <asac> Greenery: sudo aa-complain /path/to/bin
[11:06] <asac> Put all profiles into complain mode
[11:06] <asac> sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/*
[11:06] <asac> so try sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.fireofx
[11:06] <asac> fox
[11:06] <asac> so try sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox
[11:06] <asac> or try all ;)
[11:06] <asac> Greenery: ^^
[11:07] <asac> check the help page above too
[11:07] <Greenery> okay
[11:07] <asac> jdstrand: we have /usr/bin/firefox now ... that runs /usr/lib/firefox-*/run-mozilla.sh ... which in turn runs /usr/lib/firefox-*/firefox-bin :)
[11:08] <asac> maybe appending the -bin to the profile be enough?
[11:08] <Greenery> i got it working with sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/*
[11:08] <asac> e.g.g
[11:08] <asac> Greenery: thanks!
[11:08] <asac> guess that should be fixed before i upload 3.6
[11:08] <Greenery> at last ^^
[11:08] <asac> Greenery: can you wait a bit ... i want you to try something ;)
[11:08] <Greenery> sure
[11:09] <asac> backup /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox
[11:09] <asac> then edit that file
[11:09] <asac> and to the line:
[11:09] <asac> /usr/lib/firefox-*/firefox ...
[11:09] <asac> make
[11:09] <asac> /usr/lib/firefox-*/firefox-bin
[11:09] <asac> and see if that helps if you set everything in enforce mode again
[11:13] <Greenery> do i edit this line: /usr/lib/firefox*/firefox{,*[^s][^h]} flags=(complain)
[11:13] <Greenery> into the new one?
[11:14] <asac> yes
[11:14] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: FF 3.7 WFM
[11:14] <BUGabundo_remote> FYI
[11:15] <asac> we didnt change 3.7 ;)
[11:15] <BUGabundo_remote> coolio
[11:15] <BUGabundo_remote> if you need smallish tests, let em know
[11:15] <asac> you will get your sufferage soon ;)
[11:15] <BUGabundo_remote> bit busy, but I can always spare some time for you
[11:15] <asac> firefox 3.6 i am mostly concerned atm
[11:15] <asac> so you are of the hook ;)
[11:16] <BUGabundo_remote> eh
[11:16] <BUGabundo_remote> oh before I forget
[11:16] <asac> shoot
[11:16] <BUGabundo_remote> seems changing NM wifi from user profile to all users works again
[11:16] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: in lucid?
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote> before it would not connect
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: yes
[11:17] <asac> or dailies?
[11:17] <asac> great
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote> think so
[11:17] <asac> you dont run dailies?
[11:17] <Greenery> ok, firefox load fine with the edit you asked
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote> network-manager:  Installed: 0.8~rc2-0ubuntu2~nmt3
[11:17] <asac> Greenery: hmm. i am not 100% sure we need to reload the profile somewhat
[11:17] <asac> Greenery: if you change back, does it stop working again?
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote>  *** 0.8~rc2-0ubuntu2~nmt3 0
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote>         500 http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main Packages
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote>      0.8~rc2-0ubuntu1 0
[11:17] <BUGabundo_remote>         500 http://neacm.fe.up.pt lucid/main Packages
[11:18] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: ok. so you probably didnt try recently?
[11:18]  * asac assumes its not the last bit for rc2 that fixed it
[11:18] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: if there is abug open about this, please post your findings and set to fix committed
[11:19] <Greenery> asac: it works even if i changed it back
[11:19] <asac> Greenery: right. thats why i think the profile thing wasnt reloaded
[11:19] <asac> Greenery: did you run aa-enforce?
[11:19] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: no bug, from me at least
[11:19] <[reed]> asac: can you remove 3.6 from https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/449744/
[11:19] <BUGabundo_remote> I tried as recently as last week
[11:19] <[reed]> I can't figure out how to do it
[11:19] <[reed]> or maybe I don't have the needed permissions
[11:19] <Greenery> asac: no i didn't run that
[11:19] <asac> let me check
[11:19] <BUGabundo_remote> didn't work. and yesterday it worked again
[11:19] <asac> Greenery: you ened to ... atm you just complain
[11:20] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: ok. when did you last try?
[11:20] <asac> (and it didnt)
[11:20] <asac> [reed]: thats fix released i guess?
[11:20] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: I'm not entirely sure, but I think last week
[11:20] <BUGabundo_remote> when I got a new router setup
[11:20] <asac> you can set to invalid or fix released
[11:20] <BUGabundo_remote> and created a new WiFi and tried to set up All Users
[11:21] <Greenery> asac: I used aa-enforce, loads fine
[11:21] <asac> [reed]: i think micahg intentionall set those so we remember to close the bug on next upload ...
[11:21] <asac> or wasnt that fixed for "3.5.8"?
[11:21] <[reed]> asac: but it never affected 3.6 in the first place, and people are getting confused
[11:21] <asac> ah 3.6
[11:21] <asac> sorry misread
[11:21] <asac> ok
[11:22] <asac> set to invalid
[11:22] <asac> done
[11:22] <[reed]> thanks
[11:22] <[reed]> er
[11:22] <[reed]> you set the wrong one
[11:22] <[reed]> but now that I know what to do
[11:22] <[reed]> I can fix!
[11:22] <asac> ;)
[11:22] <asac> [reed]: i fixed that i think
[11:22] <asac> 3.6 -> invalid
[11:22] <asac> 3.5 -> fix committed
[11:23] <[reed]> cool
[11:47] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: strange request:
[11:48] <BUGabundo_remote> we got several ppl here at work, running debian and using ubuntumozilla PPAs
[11:48] <BUGabundo_remote> would you consider adding debian release branchs?
[11:49] <BUGabundo_remote> at least would allow software-properties-kde/gtk to work, and handle depencies
[11:49]  * BUGabundo_remote ducks
[12:00] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: not sure what you want
[12:00] <asac> folks should use ubuntu
[12:00] <BUGabundo_remote> ahaahahahahahaahah
[12:01] <BUGabundo_remote> *should* is not Freedom of choice :D
[12:02] <fta2> asac,  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/firefox-3.6pre/components/libnkgnomevfs.so', which is also in package firefox-3.6-gnome-support 0:3.6~hg20100117r33523+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1~karmic
[12:03] <fta2> didn't you say you fixed it?
[12:03] <asac> fta2: i added the replaces
[12:04] <asac> check if firefox has replaces on firefox-3.6-gnome-support
[12:04] <asac> firefox-3.6-gnome-support
[12:04] <asac> thats what i see
[12:04] <asac> in firefox branch i have
[12:05] <fta2> $ apt-cache show firefox | grep Replace
[12:05] <fta2> Replaces: firefox-3.0, firefox-3.5, firefox-3.6
[12:07] <asac> fta2:
[12:07] <asac> for my $copyright (sort keys %{$$data{$dir}{$license}}) {
[12:07] <asac>       my @values = values %{$$data{$dir}{$license}};
[12:07] <asac>       if ($#values == 1) {
[12:07] <asac>         printf "Files: %s/*\n", $dir;
[12:07] <asac>       } else {
[12:07] <asac> fta2: thats odd. i definitly committed it
[12:07] <asac> let me double check
[12:08] <asac> yes. all committed
[12:08] <asac> sure you ran update ?
[12:08] <asac> fta2: so about that snippet ... that values == 1 seems to not work
[12:08] <asac> i still get { } around single files
[12:08] <asac> in licensecheck.pl
[12:13] <fta2> $#values gives the number of values of that list minus 1
[12:14] <fta2> so use 0 to test for only 1 item, and -1 for emptiness
[12:16] <asac> heh
[12:16] <asac> ok
[12:16]  * asac tries
[12:17] <asac> hmm doesnt help
[12:17] <asac> nevermind
[12:17] <asac> lets fix that later ;)
[12:18] <asac> fta2: shit
[12:18] <asac> so we need src/chrome/third_party/wtl
[12:18] <asac> ?
[12:19] <asac> Files: src/chrome/third_party/wtl/include/{atlapp.h,atlcrack.h,atlctrls.h,atlctrlw.h,atlctrlx.h,atlddx.h,atldlgs.h,atlfind.h,atlframe.h,atlgdi.h,atlmisc.h,atlprint.h,atlres.h,atlresce.h,atlscrl.h,atlsplit.h,atltheme.h,atluser.h,atlwince.h,atlwinx.h}
[12:19] <asac> Copyright: Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.  This file is a part of the Windows Template Library. The use and distribution terms for this software are covered by the Microsoft Permissive License (Ms-PL) which can be found in the file:
[12:19]  * asac hates that appearing ;)
[12:22] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: fta: if you have a moment: why do FF 3.6, 3.7 and Chromium all drop logins after restarting the browser on so many more sites then before ?
[12:22] <BUGabundo_remote> a coworker just notice that after the upgrade for FF 3.6 in Mac.
[12:22] <asac> no clue
[12:22] <asac> guess websites get more broken
[12:22] <BUGabundo_remote> :(
[12:22] <asac> chromium is bad in general for me
[12:22] <asac> for logins
[12:22] <BUGabundo_remote> firefox does the same
[12:22] <asac> but firefox still works for the sites i am using
[12:23] <BUGabundo_remote> stuff like gmail
[12:23] <asac> works
[12:23] <BUGabundo_remote> even with Remember Me
[12:23] <asac> probably extension
[12:25] <BUGabundo_remote> no addons on his mac
[12:30] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: file upstream bug. havent seen it
[12:30] <asac> and dont have a mac
[12:32] <asac> fta2: do you know whats up with wtl?
[12:32]  * asac almost dputted it ;)
[12:35] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: also happens to me in ubuntu
[12:35] <BUGabundo_remote> so I tought it was a new Policy from browser makers
[12:36] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: check with [reed] then
[12:36] <BUGabundo_remote> (12:20:21 PM) i.ca: forteller: WTF? Has the Firefox 3.6 update yesterday + today deleted all my Firefox 3.6 beta/RC profiles!? :( !Ubuntu [19721095]
[12:36] <BUGabundo_remote> I guess they were "imported", right?
[12:36] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: users will get asked in todays update
[12:37] <asac> yesterday it kept using the ffox 3.5 profile
[12:38] <asac> fta2: i will drop it. afaics its only incuded for win
[12:39] <[reed]> BUGabundo_remote: you're talking about cookies?
[12:40] <[reed]> Chromium and Firefox use a very similar cookie implementation
[12:40] <[reed]> as in, I think Chromium just uses Firefox's impl
[12:40] <[reed]> so, if you see issues, please file bugs
[12:40] <BUGabundo_remote> [reed]: I think so
[12:40] <[reed]> Core :: Networking: Cookies
[12:40] <BUGabundo_remote> at least for site's I've seen it
[12:40] <BUGabundo_remote> like gmail, identica, etc
[12:41] <BUGabundo_remote> [reed]: what I'm seeing is sites that usually didn't logout before (early chromium/chromium 3, FF 3.5.x), now loose logins even if Remember Me box is selected
[12:42] <BUGabundo_remote> but haven't managed to put my finger on it yet, its one of those "I have this strange feeling this wasn't like this before" cases, and a coworker just mentioned the same, reforcing my beliefes
[12:43] <[reed]> yeah
[12:43] <[reed]> so, you should enable NSPR logging for cookies
[12:43] <[reed]> and file a bug
[12:43] <BUGabundo_remote> how do I do that?!
[12:46] <[reed]> one moment
[12:47] <[reed]> hmm
[12:47] <[reed]> file a bug, dwitte will tell you!
[12:47] <BUGabundo_remote> okay
[12:54] <BUGabundo_remote> [reed]: asac: fyi https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541356
[12:57] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: NSPR_LOG_MODULES=all:5
[12:57] <asac> export
[12:57] <asac> to get loads of verbose output
[12:58] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: where to ?
[12:59] <asac> in the terminal before you start
[12:59] <asac> export NSPR_LOG_MODULES=all:5
[12:59] <asac> firefox
[12:59] <BUGabundo_remote> ahh
[12:59] <BUGabundo_remote> browser already open
[12:59] <BUGabundo_remote> restarting
[12:59] <asac> killall firefox
[12:59] <asac> firefox-3.7
[13:00] <BUGabundo_remote> yeah
[13:00] <BUGabundo_remote> that's crazy debug
[13:00] <BUGabundo_remote> teeing to a log
[13:01] <BUGabundo_remote> lunch
[13:22] <asac> fta2: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=${CHROMIUM_USER_FLAGS:-"$CHROMIUM_FLAGS"} as bashism?
[13:22] <asac> chromium-browser.sh should be bash then i guess
[13:22] <asac> do you know?
[13:28] <fta2> asac, i don't think so
[13:28]  * asac wonders how to find out ;)
[13:30] <fta2> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360651/
[13:31] <asac> so pitti says its not a bashism, but doesnt make sense ;)
[13:32] <fta2> asac, full example: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360653/
[13:33] <fta2> asac, basically, i hate bash and bashisms
[13:34] <asac> fta2: but is dash a proof? does it work in posh?
[13:35] <fta2> in ubuntu, /bin/sh is dash, so it works fine
[13:35] <asac> sure
[13:35] <fta2> even if /bin/sh is bash, it's fine too
[13:35] <asac> anyway, pitti agrees with you
[13:35] <asac> thats good enough for me
[13:37] <asac> fta2: ill remove "do something aobut amd64" from TODO
[13:38] <jdstrand> Greenery, asac: aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/* is way too heavy-handed. All the apparmor profiles are now in complain mode. Better to just do: sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6
[13:38] <asac> jdstrand: i commited something to firefox-3.6.head ... can you check that
[13:38] <asac> (for apparmor)
[13:38] <jdstrand> Greenery: please perform: sudo aa-enforce /etc/apparmor.d/* ; sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6
[13:38] <asac> we have a new binary now -> firefox-bin
[13:38] <asac> its run like firefox -> run-mozilla.sh -> firefox-bin
[13:38] <jdstrand> asac: I already made the dirname and pwd changes yesterday I think
[13:39] <asac> hmm
[13:39] <asac> so its a real issue?
[13:39] <asac> ok
[13:39] <asac> but the binary name is now wrong
[13:39] <asac> so i think -bin is correct there
[13:40] <jdstrand> asac: r476 and r477 should have fixed those (timestamp: Thu 2010-01-21 07:32:53 -0600)
[13:40] <asac> hmm
[13:41] <asac> jdstrand: yeah.
[13:41] <jdstrand> asac: the profile is supposed to protect /usr/lib/@APPNAME@*/firefox{,*[^s][^h]}
[13:41] <asac> jdstrand: i changed that to:
[13:41] <asac> /usr/lib/@APPNAME@*/firefox-bin...
[13:41] <jdstrand> asac: we don't protect /usr/bin
[13:41] <asac> right
[13:41] <asac> but the binary doesnt exist in the all-static build ;)
[13:41] <jdstrand> ok
[13:41] <asac> thats why he got busted
[13:42] <jdstrand> (I'm just working through the two distinct issues we are having)
[13:42] <asac> like /usr/bin/firefox calls /usr/lib/APPDIR/run-mozilla.sh (to set envs) and calls /usr/lib/appdir/firefox-bin (the real binary)
[13:42] <asac> right
[13:42] <jdstrand> asac: you changed the pathname already?
[13:42] <asac> yes
[13:42] <asac> just wanted to check with you if thats obviously wrong
[13:42] <asac> because he couldnt really confirm that it worked
[13:42]  * jdstrand pulls the latest commits
[13:42] <asac> jdstrand: you can check the firefox .deb in daily
[13:42] <jdstrand> k
[13:43] <asac> that doesnt have the new profile yet though
[13:43] <asac> apparmore file i mean
[13:43] <asac> but i just added -bin
[13:43] <jdstrand> asac: so the daily has the updated path is what you are saying?
[13:44] <asac> asac: It supports usr/local/bin/tls.py but not usr/local/bin/tls which is why I comment.
[13:44] <asac> fta2: thats about the tlslite patch
[13:45]  * asac checks
[13:45] <asac> jdstrand: right.
[13:45] <fta2> asac, eh?
[13:45] <jdstrand> asac: ok, I'll review it and make changes if needed. at first glance it seems fine
[13:45] <fta2> asac, why do you need tls?
[13:46] <fta2> it's needed only to run the testsuite (in chromium)
[13:46] <asac> fta2: you have a patch
[13:46] <fta2> you can drop it, pitti rejected my system phython-tlslite package so i'm back to the in-source one
[13:47] <asac> hmm ok
[13:47] <asac> i fixed it fo rnow
[13:47] <asac> e.g. added that path ;)
[13:47] <asac> we can drop it if you are ok
[13:47]  * asac does that
[13:47] <Greenery> jdstrand: asac: so do I need to perform the command?
[13:48] <jdstrand> Greenery: please perform the command I mentioned. right now you disabled too many apparmor protections. you only wanted to disabled firefox, but you disabled dhclient, cups, tcpdump, ...
[13:49] <jdstrand> Greenery: the command I gave will enable everything again, then complain for firefox
[13:49] <Greenery> ok done
[13:50] <jdstrand> Greenery: we should have the apparmor fix for firefox 3.6 in the next daily, if your interested in testing it out tomorrow
[13:53] <asac> or in lucid tonight ;)
[13:54]  * asac will throw the bomb in today -- almost official
[13:54] <asac> together with chromium ;)
[13:54] <asac> bang!
[13:55] <jdstrand> asac: the apparmor profile, while disabled, is a supported feature for firefox in Ubuntu. I'd like to make sure that when you transition away that the new person (people) are testing firefox with the profile enabled before uploading (at least to Ubuntu, but preferably in the dailies too). what would be the best way to ensure that?
[13:55] <BUGabundo_remote> autch
[14:18] <asac> fta2: is the package lintian clean?
[14:18] <asac> do you have the warnings for the binary lintian check at hand ?
[14:18] <jdstrand> asac: so is /usr/lib/firefox*/firefox-bin the thing we want to protect? what is /usr/lib/firefox*/firefox?
[14:18] <asac> jdstrand: yes
[14:18] <jdstrand> ah, it is a shell script
[14:18] <asac> ah sorry didnt see the last question
[14:18] <asac> its a script
[14:19] <asac> yet another ;)
[14:19] <jdstrand> asac: and firefox-bin doesn't exist in 3.5?
[14:19] <asac> it doesnt exist for xulrunner builds
[14:19] <asac> only for all-static
[14:19] <jdstrand> ok cool
[14:19] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: [reed]: FYI 3.6 seems to handle proxy auth much better, only one pop up :P #WIN
[14:19] <jdstrand> then I can make that much cleaner
[14:19] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: great
[14:19] <asac> there was a bug in ubuntu ... we should close it after upload
[14:20] <asac> jdstrand: much cleaner?
[14:20] <BUGabundo_remote> yeah, hence the FYI :)
[14:20] <jdstrand> asac: the globbing
[14:20] <asac> jdstrand: e.g. no xulrunner access etc.?
[14:20] <asac> hmm ok.
[14:20] <asac> i trust you  ;)
[14:20] <jdstrand> asac: the profile will need to be reworked for the xul changes, etc
[14:21] <jdstrand> it is going to get an overhaul for lucid anyway
[14:21] <jdstrand> but not today
[14:21] <jdstrand> asac: so, with the static build, are you planning to be able to have 3.7 and 3.6 co-installable?
[14:21] <jdstrand> (like now)
[14:22] <jdstrand> asac: if so, /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox and '/usr/lib/firefox*/...' are too general
[14:23] <jdstrand> (/etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox is a conffile, so dpkg will barf, and even if you fix that, that specific globbing will cause problems)
[14:38] <fta2> asac, sorry, i'm busy with work, i can build it and give you the lintian traces (there are a few), it have that as part of my usual pbuilder setup
[14:57] <mbana> anyone using the new firefox
[14:57] <maxb> Hi. I'm using thunderbird 3 from the umd ppa, but find I'm missing enigmail (It needs a new version built to work with TB3).  Are there any existing packaged extensions for TB3 that might help me understand what a package of one is supposed to look like, such that I might attempt to update the enigmail package? Am I a fool to contemplate this with no prior experience of the mozilla buildsystem?
[15:10] <jdstrand> asac: well, I can see it is a problem-- I am going to adjust it so it use @APPNAME@-@APPVER@ for now
[15:10] <jdstrand> asac: that will make it so dailies are co-installable and the profiles will protect what they are intended to
[15:14] <mbana> so i upgraded to 3.6
[15:14] <mbana> the font hinting is well off
[15:29] <asac> mbana: yes, I missed you so much ;)
[15:29] <mbana> lmfao
[15:29] <mbana> !
[15:30] <asac> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541319
[15:39] <joe_l> I'm working on a package for seamonkey 2.0 and could use some help with the package name. Can someone help me?
[15:40] <micahg> joe_l: what's the issue?
[15:40] <micahg> asac: were the merges into xul192 and ff36 ok?
[15:40] <joe_l> morning micahg
[15:41] <joe_l> get-orig-source is working the way I expect, and I want to have release names and nightly names.
[15:41] <joe_l> I think I still have it wrong though.
[15:41] <mbana> y are u doing --disable-system-cairo
[15:41] <mbana> id rather u use system cairo
[15:41] <fta2> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360718/
[15:42] <joe_l> I don't know what cairo is. Once the package namd is fixed, we can add the proper config options.
[15:42] <asac> fta2: E: chromium-browser source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package build-depends: xbase-clients
[15:42] <asac> whats that?
[15:43] <asac> joe_l: start with the packaging branch we already have ;)
[15:45] <mbana> asac: what do u propose
[15:45] <asac> mbana: CC yourself on the bug
[15:46] <joe_l> micahg: I called the release package seamonkey-2.0_2.0.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~karmic and the nightly seamonkey-2.0_2.0.2~20100122r4747+nobinonly~karmic-0ubuntu2
[15:47] <micahg> joe_l: you can't official make a release package....
[15:48] <micahg> but the nightly should probably be 2.0.2~hg20100122 like we do
[15:48] <joe_l> This is why I'm asking for help. John told me to rename the package.
[15:48]  * micahg is referring to branding
[15:48] <asac> micahg: have a chance to test the upgrade again? ;)
[15:49] <micahg> asac: sure, in a little bit
[15:49] <asac> thanks a bunch
[15:49] <micahg> asac: what about my merge of kees patches
[15:49] <asac> micahg: that looked ok
[15:49] <micahg> was the merge comment on teh 2nd branch ok?
[15:49] <micahg> xul192
[15:49] <asac> if you want to try all the latest on karmic, i have uploaded the proposed final package to my sandbox ppa
[15:50]  * asac guesses that that has finished
[15:50] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox
[15:50] <asac> with official branding and so on
[15:50] <asac> so i used debhelper 7 and now i get build failures in hardy/intrepid
[15:50]  * asac slaps his head
[15:51] <fta2> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360724/
[15:52] <fta2> remember the backports
[15:52] <micahg> asac: did you merge the ff35 changelog?
[15:53] <asac> micahg: no ;)
[15:54] <asac> dont remind me of such things :(
[15:54] <micahg> heh, I haven't figured out an easy way to do it yet, otherwise I would have when I cleaned up the changelog
[15:56] <jcastro> asac: http://blogs.computerworld.com/15443/talling_firefox_3_6_one_more_reason_linux_isnt_ready_for_the_prime_time_mass_market
[15:56] <jcastro> asac: some motivation! :p
[15:57] <asac> jcastro: strange point of view on it
[15:57] <asac> do you know the author?
[15:57] <asac> or how to contact?
[15:58] <jcastro> I could contact if you'd like
[15:58] <micahg> asac: I did it a little better this time, I pinned your PPA and the security PPA to 500
[15:58] <jcastro> asac: it would be awesomer if we could just say "click upgrade, you're welcome!"
[15:58] <micahg> seems to want to upgrade all the right packages
[15:59] <micahg> should I go for it?
[16:00] <micahg> I'll add instructions to the FIrefox Upgrade help page once we have the PPA packages in place for stable releases
[16:00] <micahg> jcastro: ^^
[16:01] <micahg> asac: should I upgrade?  it seems to want to upgrade the right packages
[16:01] <jcastro> micahg: sweet
[16:02] <jcastro> isn't it eventually going in -updates? I thought that's what the new spec was about?
[16:02] <micahg> jcastro: we created this yesterday: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable
[16:02] <micahg> jcastro: eventually
[16:02] <micahg> the PPA is for the people who want cutting edge releases
[16:02] <asac> micahg: yes
[16:02] <micahg> -updates needs more QA
[16:02] <jcastro> right
[16:03] <micahg> asac: upgrading :)
[16:03] <jcastro> micahg: that would be a nice thing to blog on planet like, today. The plan for 3.7
[16:03]  * jcastro points at asac
[16:03] <micahg> asac: FF seems big at 37MB
[16:03] <jcastro> er, 3.6 I mean. :)
[16:03]  * micahg needs to make a blog...
[16:03] <asac> jcastro: i _will_ blog, but not _before_ the packages are there and confirmed to cause no major harm ;)
[16:03] <BUGabundo_remote> micahg: is that the "semi-official" ppa with 3.6 final ?
[16:04] <asac> still targetting to get the packages everywhere today
[16:04] <micahg> BUGabundo_remote: the link I just posted will be where the final version goes
[16:04] <asac> same for the blog post
[16:04] <asac> ;)
[16:04] <micahg> asac's PPA is where the almost final version is
[16:04] <asac> sandbox
[16:04] <BUGabundo_remote> I don't want to advice ppl a not so final  PPA
[16:04] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox
[16:04] <BUGabundo_remote> asac one is not the best bet now
[16:05] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: point them to the firefox-stable
[16:05] <BUGabundo_remote> ppl are doing strange things
[16:05] <asac> and say that will get the stuff soon
[16:05] <asac> e.g. without 12hours
[16:05] <asac> within
[16:05] <BUGabundo_remote> I already commented in 2 blogs about not using mozilla binairies or other repos
[16:05] <micahg> asac: if it's uploaded to lucid by 9PM UTC, I can backport to PPA
[16:05] <BUGabundo_remote> thanks asac
[16:06] <micahg> asac: after that, you might have to do it if you need it done tonight  :)
[16:06] <micahg> asac: I assume we should use standard backport notation LUCID_VER~release1?  or would you prefer notation used in security PPA?
[16:12] <micahg> asac: I didn't get a notice to restart ff3.6
[16:13] <asac> micahg: yes.
[16:13] <asac> (re. version)
[16:13] <asac> but no need to do release commits if its identical with the lucid version
[16:13] <asac> micahg: oops
[16:13] <asac> micahg please file a bug on the restart notification... thats ubufox bug
[16:13] <asac> ;)
[16:15] <micahg> asac: no, that's a bug on the test:  pgrep -x firefox -U $(id -u)
[16:15] <asac> micahg: thats the other restart notification
[16:15] <asac> i want to remove that
[16:16] <asac> ubufox is the real restart notification where you can hit "restart"
[16:16] <micahg> asac: I thought it was based on that secondary notification?
[16:16] <asac> no
[16:17] <asac> that pgrep thing is crap ;)
[16:17] <micahg> k
[16:17] <asac> redundant and painful ;)
[16:17] <micahg> I'll file  abug then
[16:18]  * micahg needs to learn more about ubufox
[16:21] <micahg> bug 511250
[16:22]  * micahg is restarting...let's see if I still have a browser ;)
[16:23] <micahg> asac: .desktop file still says alpha
[16:24] <asac> true
[16:24] <asac> thanks
[16:25] <micahg> asac: looks good, version seems right
[16:25] <micahg> they even fixes about:
[16:25] <micahg> fixed:
[16:25] <micahg> actually we might have done that with all-in-one
[16:25]  * micahg goes to check 3.7
[16:25] <micahg> nope, we did that :)
[16:26] <asac> fixes
[16:26] <asac> fixed
[16:26] <asac> (desktop)
[16:26] <asac> micahg: can you try to install abrowser and see what happens?
[16:26] <asac> after the upgrade is fine
[16:28] <micahg> asac: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/360746/
[16:28] <micahg> maybe firefox-branding should replace the other 2?
[16:30] <asac> not firefox-3.6-branding
[16:30] <asac> but the other
[16:30] <asac> yes
[16:31] <asac> maybe force
[16:31] <asac> i am more interested in if it starts etc. ;)
[16:31] <micahg> asac: why not ff36 branding?
[16:32] <asac> hmm. will think about it
[16:32] <asac> maybe you are right
[16:33] <asac> but it was never in the archive
[16:34] <micahg> ah, right
[16:35] <micahg> so, should I go through with the abrowser install?
[16:36] <asac> !test
[16:36] <BUGabundo_remote> LOL
[16:37] <micahg> asac: so, should I go through with the abrowser install?
[16:47] <micahg> asac: no request to restart after installing abrowser either
[16:47] <asac> yes, same issue
[16:48] <micahg> asac: is it supposed to be firefox-bin running?
[16:48] <micahg> asac: no icon for abrowser
[16:48] <BUGabundo_remote> micahg: ppa for thunderbird 3.0.1 ?
[16:48] <micahg> BUGabundo_remote: one problem at a time ;)
[16:49] <BUGabundo_remote> ok
[16:49] <micahg> BUGabundo_remote: hopefully early next week
[16:49] <BUGabundo_remote> users asking for it
[16:49] <BUGabundo_remote> will reply so
[16:49] <BUGabundo_remote> thanks
[16:49] <asac> micahg: no icon in the menu or on panel=
[16:49] <asac> ?
[16:49] <micahg> nope
[16:50] <asac> neither?
[16:50] <asac> ok
[16:50] <asac> micahg: does it start etc.?
[16:50] <asac> and has abrowser branding?
[16:50] <micahg> asac: no .desktop file was installed
[16:50] <asac> thats supposed to be in abrowser-branding package fwiw
[16:50] <micahg> http://pastebin.com/f54cc8a62
[16:51] <asac> hmm
[16:51] <asac> micahg: so if you start firefox it doesnt start?
[16:51] <micahg> no
[16:51] <micahg> XML parse error
[16:52] <micahg>  abrowser
[16:52] <micahg> run-mozilla.sh: Cannot execute /usr/lib/firefox-3.6/abrowser-bin.
[16:52] <asac> hmm. me checks something
[16:53] <asac> too bad .. dont have the build tree somwhat
[16:53]  * asac spins
[17:00] <andersk> The Smoothing control (None/Grayscale/Subpixel) and the Subpixel Order control (RGB/BGR/VRGB/VBGR) takes effect after a restart of Firefox (though in other applications it takes effect immediately).  The Hinting control (None/Slight/Medium/Full) does not take effect in Firefox.
[17:02] <andersk> No, the upgrade didn’t go smoothly:
[17:02] <andersk>  dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/firefox_3.6~hg20100120r33527+nob inonly-0ubuntu1~umd2_amd64.deb (--unpack):
[17:03] <andersk>   trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/firefox-3.6pre/components/libnkgnomevfs.so', which is also in package firefox-3.6-gnome-support 0:3.6~hg20100117r33523+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1
[17:03] <andersk> But I think I tried to upgrade at a time when not all the packages had been built yet.
[17:03] <andersk> I fixed things with aptitude manually.
[17:05] <asac> yeah
[17:05] <asac> thanks for the confirm on the hinting not working
[17:06] <asac> andersk: did you try the upgrad again today? that should be fixed
[17:09] <andersk> Trying now.
[17:10] <maxb> Hi. I'm using thunderbird 3 from the umd ppa, but find I'm missing enigmail (It needs a new version built to work with TB3).  Are there any existing packaged extensions for TB3 that might help me understand what a package of one is supposed to look like, such that I might attempt to kludge together a buildable enigmail package for TB3? Am I a fool to contemplate this with no prior experience of the mozilla buildsystem?
[17:12] <micahg> maxb: we need to work on the dev packages for tb3
[17:12] <micahg> maxb: 32 bit or 64 bit?
[17:12] <maxb> 64
[17:12] <micahg> maxb: out of luck at the moment
[17:13] <maxb> fair enough
[17:13] <asac> ok
[17:13] <micahg> lightning was published upstream 64 bit
[17:13] <asac> guess have to run out in a bit and finish all this heap of work then ;)
[17:14] <micahg> maxb: do you want a link to 64 bit lightning?
[17:16] <maxb> upstream? not particularly. Anything you think might help me have a go at building enigmail 1.0? yes please.
[17:17] <asac> we ned the -dev package first
[17:20] <andersk> I downgraded the firefox* and xulrunner* packages to lucid, then upgraded from the umd PPA.  Seemed to work.
[17:27] <mahfouz1> http://pastebin.com/m63c895b1
[17:28] <mahfouz1> seems to be similat to andersk
[17:28] <mahfouz1> should I try to reinstall?
[17:39] <asac> mahfouz1: edit the apparmor profile
[17:40] <asac> mahfouz1: wait a day. its fixed
[17:40] <asac> until then you can set your apparmor profile to complain
[17:40] <asac> sudo aa-complain usr.bin.firefox
[17:40] <asac> i think
[17:40] <asac> aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox
[17:40] <asac> actually
[17:40] <asac> mahfouz1: ^^
[17:53] <mahfouz1> oh
[17:53] <mahfouz1> apparmor ist way to rowdy
[17:55] <mahfouz1> but how can it happen? I had firefox-3.6 package running without problems before
[17:56] <asac> unless you want to become a devloper, explaining that is too much ;)
[17:56] <asac> its technical detail ;)
[17:56] <asac> its fixed however :)
[17:57] <asac> it has to do with us renaming packegs, flipping from uxing xulrunner to all-static and so on :)
[17:57] <mahfouz1> you mean it's fixed but not in ppa yet?
[17:57] <asac> yes
[17:57] <asac> we fixed it when it was first reported ... which was like 9 hours ago ;)
[17:58] <mahfouz1> ok thx
[17:58] <fta> BUGabundo_remote, wrt logins, same answer as always, did you search for/file bugs?
[17:58] <asac> mahfouz1: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/firefox/firefox-3.6.head/revision/486
[17:58] <asac> that the commit
[18:01] <mbana> asac: do u think a fix will be available soon
[18:01] <asac> i dont think it will
[18:02] <asac> we were asked for ages to use system-cairo ... so now we use it.
[18:02] <asac> and hope for upstream fixing it ;)
[18:02] <asac> err ... to use in-source cairo that is
[18:02] <mbana> that doesn't make no sense
[18:02] <mbana> using system cairo
[18:03] <gnomefreak> asac: you know that firefox-3.6 cant be upgraded right?
[18:04] <BUGabundo_remote> fta: I did file for mozilla
[18:04] <gnomefreak> well branding has unmet deps
[18:05] <fta> BUGabundo_remote, didn't i already say that i'm no longer using ff anywhere?
[18:06] <mbana> what's a good site to arrange meetings for close friends.  i remember crossing one but i forgot the link
[18:06] <asac> gnomefreak: read irclogs ... i have to run
[18:06] <gnomefreak> asac: i cant read them i just got here but that means you know about it :)
[18:09] <micahg> gnomefreak: what's the Q?
[18:09] <micahg> asac's sandbox ppa has the latest fixes
[18:09] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox/+packages
[18:09] <gnomefreak> micahg: just ff-3.6-branding i just wanted to let him know if he didnt already
[18:09] <micahg> I managed to upgrade fine from his sandbox
[18:09] <gnomefreak> thanks
[18:10] <micahg> there's one more fix not there
[18:10] <micahg> which he committed already
[18:10] <BUGabundo_remote> fta: if you read backlog, you will see reed said Ch uses the same code as FF
[18:12] <fta> BUGabundo_remote, maybe, but if noone attracts the ch devs attention, nothing will happen
[18:13] <gnomefreak> i may be kicked off soon depending on a few things i killed but we shall see :)
[18:21] <gnomefreak> micahg: the page doesnt show the repo to add to sources, is there a way to enable that view(those lines)
[18:22] <micahg> gnomefreak: get rid of +packages
[18:22] <gnomefreak> ?
[18:22] <micahg> in the URL
[18:23] <gnomefreak> oh ok
[18:23] <gnomefreak> thanks that did it
[18:31] <gnomefreak> micahg: it doesnt fix the unmet deps for *branding
[18:31]  * micahg didn't have the issue
[18:31] <micahg> are you trying abrowser?
[18:32] <gnomefreak> micahg: no im using firefox now i used to use abrowser
[18:32] <gnomefreak> and now 3.6 wont open either looks like it wont open due to xulrunner
[18:33] <micahg> gnomefreak: where you are installing from?
[18:33] <gnomefreak> mind you im using dailies
[18:33] <gnomefreak> terminal?
[18:33] <micahg> that's broke
[18:33] <micahg> dailies are broke today
[18:33] <gnomefreak> oh great
[18:33] <micahg> you need asac's version if you wnat to test the upgrade
[18:33] <gnomefreak> be back
[18:36] <micahg> asac: why did you set the bug to invalild for firebug alpha for 3.6?  the upstream bug shows pushes on all branches
[18:37] <asac> micahg: reed said it was never affected
[18:37] <asac> check with him
[18:37] <asac> otherwist its fix committed
[18:37] <asac> out
[18:37] <asac> bbi2h
[18:38] <micahg> [reed]: mozilla bug 510040 shows a push for 1.9.2 bug you said bug 449744 wasn't affected?
[18:39] <[reed]> micahg: 3.6 final is not affected
[18:39] <[reed]> yes, 1.9.2 was affected
[18:39] <[reed]> but it was fixed before 3.6
[18:40] <[reed]> it was just confusing people to say 3.6 was affected
[18:40] <[reed]> since 3.6 final wasn't affected
[18:40] <micahg> [reed]: yes, that's right, but the fix for ubuntu is either in ff3.6 or ff3.5.8
[18:40] <micahg> it's not saying it was affected
[18:40] <micahg> it's saying it was fixed
[18:41] <micahg> milestone id 3.6 final
[18:41] <micahg> *is
[18:41] <[reed]> well, note that better somehow then?
[18:41] <[reed]> I just know it was confusing _Mozilla_ developers ;P
[18:42] <micahg> I fixed the statuses
[18:42] <micahg> fix released on 3.6 fix committed on 3.5.8
[18:42] <micahg> and triaged in ubuntu
[18:42] <micahg> [reed]: they're working on importing bmo statuses
[18:43] <micahg> but until then, I'm just adding release milestones
[18:43] <micahg> s/statuses/milestones/
[18:43] <[reed]> ok
[18:43] <[reed]> sounds good
[18:44] <micahg> [reed]: it's an easy way for me to know what bugs to close when we release into ubuntu
[18:44] <[reed]> ok
[18:44] <micahg> [reed]: it's actually a slight abuse of upstream milestones
[18:44]  * micahg had bugs in LP filed
[18:45] <micahg> bug 494943 and bug 494941
[18:47] <gnomefreak> just my luck firefox-3.6 is broken using any version
[18:47] <micahg> gnomefreak: wfm from asac's ppa
[18:48] <gnomefreak> 3.6+lucid
[18:48] <micahg> https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox
[18:48] <micahg> ah
[18:48] <micahg> yeah, sol until upload to archive
[18:48] <gnomefreak> micahg: i have that repo enabled
[18:48] <gnomefreak> micahg: k
[18:48]  * micahg thnks
[18:48] <micahg> i just tested karmic
[18:48] <gnomefreak> np
[18:49] <micahg> he didn't spin the final tarball for lucid
[18:49] <micahg> gnomefreak: you could probably copy the karmic firefox page from his sandbox to your ppa's lucid pocket
[18:49] <micahg> s/page/package
[18:49] <micahg> bbiab2h
[18:50] <gnomefreak> micahg: when will it be fixed/uploaded?
[18:50] <micahg> gnomefreak: hopefully later tonight I think
[18:50] <micahg> idk
[18:50] <gnomefreak> planned
[18:50] <micahg> asac will be back in about 2hrs
[18:50] <gnomefreak> micahg: k
[18:50]  * micahg is away
[18:50]  * gnomefreak hopfully wont be here than ;)
[19:24] <blaamann> Hi, I cannot launch firefox-3.6.1. I got an error about missing libxul.so. More info with: ldd firefox-bin | grep xul libxul.so => not found . Last I got it to launch when 'export LD_BIND_NOW=1' before launching firefox from /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.1pre
[19:26] <gnomefreak> blaamann: from daily repo?
[19:26] <blaamann> gnomefreak: Yes from PPA in Karmic.
[19:26] <blaamann> Let me check again.
[19:30] <blaamann> gnomefreak: http://pastebin.org/80463
[19:31] <blaamann> gnomefreak: http://pastebin.org/80464
[19:31] <gnomefreak> blaamann: can you give the line that says installed when using apt-cache policy
[19:32] <gnomefreak> blaamann: did you run it as root (sudo/su)?
[19:33] <gnomefreak> blaamann: maybe try a new profile. I do know that daily builds are broken for Lucid not sure about karmic
[19:33] <gnomefreak> be back smoke
[19:33] <blaamann> gnomefreak: No as a 'normal' user.
[19:34] <blaamann> gnomefreak: http://pastebin.org/80467
[19:37] <gnomefreak> looking
[19:38] <gnomefreak> that looks like asac's sandbox PPA
[19:40] <blaamann> gnomefreak: This is how I run it http://pastebin.org/80488
[19:40] <blaamann> from line 6
[19:41] <gnomefreak> we have to get you a new pastebin site ;)
[19:41] <blaamann> it sucks?
[19:42] <gnomefreak> blaamann: pop-ups everytime it is opened. 3.7 isnt blocking them but says it is. not sure any other version firefox blocks or not
[19:42]  * gnomefreak wondersing why you are trying to run a version other than the one installed
[19:43] <gnomefreak> s/wondersing/wondering
[19:43] <gnomefreak> 3.6.1pre/ doesnt match the version from policy
[19:44] <gnomefreak> oh and when running apt-cache* you dont need sudo
[19:45] <gnomefreak> run apt-cache policy firefox-3.6 from your home dir
[19:45] <blaamann> http://dpaste.com/149154/
[19:45] <blaamann> Better pastebin? ;-)
[19:46] <gnomefreak> blaamann: yes much better ;)
[19:46] <gnomefreak> why is it trying to run the daily version when the stable version is installed
[19:47] <gnomefreak> that is at least 1 of the issues i see without diggging deep into it
[19:48] <gnomefreak> blaamann: you may want to wait for asac/micah to get back and see if they can help more. they both work on firefox daily
[19:49] <blaamann> gnomefreak: Thanks, I might hang around for a while (gf tends to shut of my computer).
[19:50]  * gnomefreak had same issue until i talked to her seeing as together we have 6 PCs atm
[20:11] <gnomefreak> !info firefox-3.5 hardy
[20:12] <gnomefreak> !info firefox-3.0 hardy
[20:30] <gnomefreak> one of these days ill get caught up on emails
[20:31] <Aethelred> no, you won't
[20:31] <Aethelred> well, if you re-define what "caught up" means, then you have a shot.
[20:46] <asac> blaamann: run sudo aa-complain /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox
[20:46] <asac> and wait till tomorrow
[20:46] <asac> that will fix it
[20:46] <asac> fta: maybe we can kick off a new firefox daily run?
[20:47] <asac> have the feeling lots of folks end up with that issue
[20:47] <asac> 3.6
[20:47] <asac> only
[20:54] <fta> asac, done
[20:57] <blaamann> asac: Ok, I will wait till tomorrow.
[20:57]  * gnomefreak tried using sandbox build but still borked :)
[20:58] <gnomefreak> i guess i should try another key
[21:00] <asac> blaamann: you can downgrade to the sandbox biuld
[21:01] <gnomefreak> ^^^
[21:01] <asac> gnomefreak: if you upgraded to dailies then sandbox version will be lower
[21:01] <asac> so you need to downgrade
[21:01] <gnomefreak> asac: Installed: 3.6+lucid
[21:02] <asac> gnomefreak: thats the fake transition
[21:02] <asac> firefox
[21:02] <gnomefreak> i downgraded a couple hours a go
[21:02] <asac> is the package name
[21:02] <gnomefreak> huh? it is installed as firefox-3.6
[21:02] <asac> thats the fake transition package as i said
[21:02] <gnomefreak> under firefox package i have Installed: 3.5.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu1
[21:03] <asac> thats empty now
[21:03] <asac> ok
[21:03] <asac> that sounds right
[21:03] <gnomefreak> what package than?
[21:03] <asac> do you have firefox-branding?
[21:03] <asac> or abrowser-branding?
[21:04] <gnomefreak> no branding
[21:04] <gnomefreak> firefox not abrowser
[21:04] <asac> you dont have firefox-branding package?
[21:04] <asac> oh
[21:05] <gnomefreak> hold that thought. no but when i downgraded it said i had it trying now
[21:05] <asac> well you really have the wrong versions
[21:05] <gnomefreak> cant install it still
[21:05] <asac> you need firefox and firefox-branding and firefox-gnome-support packages from sandbox
[21:05] <gnomefreak> firefox-3.6-branding: Depends: firefox-branding but it is not installable
[21:05] <asac> try installing it directly
[21:06] <gnomefreak> so i have to uninstall "firefox" version now? 3.7*
[21:06] <asac> go back one step: paste dpkg -l firefox\*
[21:06] <asac> COLUMND=200 dpkg -l firefox\*
[21:06] <asac> actually
[21:08] <gnomefreak> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360877/
[21:09] <asac> gnomefreak: apt-cache policy firefox
[21:10] <gnomefreak> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360878/
[21:12] <gnomefreak> installing firefox-3.6 installs the transitional-special? maybe i should install it directly from PPA?
[21:14] <gnomefreak> 3.6+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~asac1 should be the package i need right?
[21:14] <asac> gnomefreak: yes
[21:14] <gnomefreak> ok will try it
[21:14] <asac> you dont have my apt lines in there ;)
[21:14] <asac> add the sandbox ppa ;)
[21:14] <gnomefreak> yes i do
[21:15] <gnomefreak> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360879/
[21:17] <gnomefreak> downloading from PPA and install using dpkg
[21:18] <gnomefreak> asac: i have to remove 3.5 first?
[21:19] <asac> no
[21:19] <asac> that should work
[21:19] <asac> gnomefreak: heh
[21:20] <asac> i have no lucid packages in sandbox ;)
[21:20] <asac> so stick to daily
[21:20] <asac> and fix apparmore if you have issues till tomorrow
[21:20] <gnomefreak> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360884/
[21:20] <gnomefreak> jamie pushed that fix i thought
[21:22]  * gnomefreak will wait til tomorrow assuming you are working tomorrow
[21:22] <asac> gnomefreak: i am not working tomorrow
[21:22] <asac> at least officially
[21:23] <asac> i would really hope to just turn the computer off for a day ;) ... for once
[21:23] <gnomefreak> asac: you going to push the updated version?
[21:23] <asac> gnomefreak: just enable dailies and run dist-upgrade ;)
[21:23] <asac> that should really really work :)
[21:23] <gnomefreak> not tonight right
[21:23] <asac> i have to run a couple tests on it, but yes.
[21:23] <asac> trying to upload tonight!!!!!
[21:23] <gnomefreak> ;)
[21:23] <asac> because i dont want to work tomorrow :-P
[21:27]  * gnomefreak /away for a bit
[21:32] <asac> ccheney: there? so there is some .so shipped for arm in ooo that is coming from jaunty
[21:32] <asac> can you confirm that?
[21:32] <asac> which so is that?
[21:33] <asac> ccheney: help ;) plzzz
[21:33] <asac> :-P
[21:34] <ccheney> asac: its something that doko fixed up so that it would work on arkm
[21:34] <ccheney> er arm
[21:34]  * ccheney looks at the source to see if he can see why
[21:34] <asac> right
[21:34] <asac> what file is that?
[21:34] <asac> libpyuno.so?
[21:34] <asac> or pyuno.so :-P?
[21:35] <ccheney> libgcc3_uno.so.jaunty
[21:35] <asac> hmm
[21:35] <asac> ccheney: where is that shipped?
[21:36] <asac> e.g. in what dir?
[21:36] <ccheney> in ure
[21:36] <ccheney> usr/lib/ure/lib/
[21:36] <asac> ure?
[21:36] <asac> whats that
[21:36] <ccheney> Uno Runtime Environment
[21:36] <ccheney> dpkg -p ure :)
[21:37] <ccheney> iirc it does a shim from java to c++ or something like that
[21:38] <ccheney> asac: do you happen to know if the OOo 3.2 test build worked for doko? i forgot to ask him today before he got off work
[21:41] <asac> ccheney: unfortunately cant remember exactly
[21:41] <asac> didnt he paste something?
[21:41] <asac> 14:34 < doko> asac, ccheney: ARM patches for OOo updated, the URL for the ooo-build repo is wrong. Vcs-Git: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/git/ooo-build/ooo-build
[21:44] <micahg> asac: so, do you need anything else from me today?
[21:44] <asac> micahg: if you want to cleanup the changelog ... add bugs etc. ;)
[21:44] <asac> ?
[21:45] <ccheney> asac: ah ok
[21:45] <micahg> asac: I thought I already did...
[21:45] <ccheney> asac: my client didn't highlight it
[21:46] <asac> ccheney: or you missed it ... like i miss a bunch ;)
[21:46] <micahg> asac: bugs already closed at the top of the changelof
[21:47] <ccheney> asac: yea even lastlog can't find it for some reason
[21:48]  * ccheney wonders where he put the updated arm patch
[21:49] <ccheney> its not in git afaict
[21:51] <BUGabundo> asac: should I purge what ever is left of 3.5 from my system ?
[21:51] <asac> BUGabundo: sure thats a transitional package now
[21:51] <asac> update-manager is supposed to remove it on dist-upgrade
[21:51]  * gnomefreak removed 3.5 to install 3.6's fx
[21:51] <asac> ccheney: he said in bzr
[21:52]  * ccheney emailed doko to find out details
[21:52] <ccheney> oh
[21:52] <asac> ccheney: the git branch was a second thing: read what he wrote ;)
[21:52] <gnomefreak> asac: is the version in your sandbox greater than UMD?
[21:52] <BUGabundo> asac: I only use aptitude safe-upgrade/full-upgrade
[21:52] <ccheney> asac: ah i assumed he meant a new arm patch for the ooo-build/patches/dev300/ directory
[21:52] <asac> gnomefreak: no. but since you are a daily user you will only get a smooth upgrade with daily enabled
[21:52] <BUGabundo> Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main firefox-3.5 3.6.1~hg20100122r33533+nobinonly-0ubuntu1~umd1 [72.6kB]
[21:52] <ccheney> asac: we already had several in there, heh
[21:52] <BUGabundo> its still pulling FF 3.5 packages :D
[21:53] <asac> e.g. i dont provide clean upgrades for users of firefox-3.6
[21:53] <fta> jcastro, my vdpau is once again broken, what about yours?
[21:53] <asac> in the archive ... i assume they can run dailies for another few days
[21:53] <ccheney> grr my bzr apparently wasn't setup on my chroot properly
[21:53] <gnomefreak> since ff3.5 was blocking my 3.6 install i removed both and installed 3.6 clean from your sandbox using dpkg
[21:54] <gnomefreak> last i heard umd 3.6 is broken
[21:54] <jcastro> fta: I am afraid to log out
[21:54] <gnomefreak> its not opening :(
[21:55] <jcastro> fta: yeah it is.
[21:55] <asac> what is vdpau?
[21:55] <asac> a failed voodoo clone?
[21:55] <jcastro> fta: it works but clearly not offloading to the gpu
[21:55] <fta> jcastro, i didn't, but i've got a new nvidia-current, and more errors
[21:55] <gnomefreak> well that version of 3.6 is broken too
[21:55] <jcastro> asac: it offloads video to the gpu
[21:55] <ccheney> asac: actually the patches themselves aren't in bzr but some of his changes are in there (eg changelog, etc)
[21:55] <asac> oh no. thats not fun. my gpu should stay idle ;)
[21:55] <BUGabundo> asac: LOLOL
[21:56] <fta> jcastro, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360896/
[21:56] <asac> maybe i will need it at some point ... *cough*
[21:56] <gnomefreak> ah same problem as blaamann
[21:56] <jcastro> asac: if you have a crap cpu then it's handy ... for things like netbooks
[21:56] <asac> fta: can you kick off a firefox 3.6 now?
[21:56] <asac> ;)
[21:56] <asac> i cant answer the aa-complain thing anymore
[21:56] <asac> ;)
[21:56] <fta> asac, again?
[21:56] <asac> fta: oh. when did you do it?
[21:56] <asac> if you already pushed one after i asked then its fine i guess
[21:56]  * asac checks
[21:56] <fta> [21:54] <fta> asac, done
[21:57] <gnomefreak> asac: did you fix blaamann's permission issues on 3.6?
[21:57]  * ccheney hopes to get a new OOo upload maybe tomorrow :)
[21:58] <asac> gnomefreak: ^^
[21:58] <gnomefreak> thanks
[21:59] <asac> fta: kk
[21:59] <micahg> asac: I'll plan on working on tb3 sat night if I don't see it done, also, I'll plan on backporting to firefox-stable from Lucid if I don't see it done
[21:59] <asac> gnomefreak: or wait another hour till next ffox 3.6 is in daily ;)
[21:59] <gnomefreak> ah its apparmor
[21:59] <asac> micahg: yes.
[21:59] <asac> micahg: focus on tb3
[21:59] <asac> ffox will get done ;)
[21:59] <asac> place your bets :-P
[22:00] <micahg> k, backport will take 5 min ;)
[22:00] <asac> also chromium will be in NEW
[22:00] <asac> betandwin ;)
[22:00] <blaamann> gnomefreak: http://www.webupd8.org/2010/01/fix-firefox-36-from-mozilla-daily-ppa.html
[22:00] <asac> micahg: right. but 5 minutes is a lot here ;)
[22:00] <gnomefreak> well it didnt fix mine i dont think
[22:01] <micahg> asac: I should be back online around midnight UTC Sunday
[22:01] <asac> blaamann: its already uploaded: https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
[22:01] <asac> waiting for a build slot
[22:02] <asac> but thanks for the post
[22:02] <asac> micahg: ok lets talk then
[22:02]  * asac takes a break before the final round :-P
[22:04] <asac> ccheney: can you try to not ship this bad gcc uno thing?
[22:04] <asac> do you know if that was tried in lucid again?
[22:07] <ccheney> asac: i have no idea if it has been tried again, doko did the arm building and created the initial hack to have it included
[22:08] <ccheney> from what i can gather the toolchain is just as broken in lucid as it was in karmic though
[22:08] <asac> hmm.
[22:08] <asac> that isnt really the thing i wanted to hear
[22:09] <asac> ccheney: do we need libgcc3_uno in ooo at all ;)
[22:09] <asac> stupid question i guess
[22:09] <ccheney> the arm patch doko was fixing up yesterday was related to gcc not working in Os mode (aiui)
[22:09] <ccheney> yes we need it as much as we need gcc on arm to begin with, heh
[22:09] <ccheney> debian has just disabled OOo on arm altogether
[22:10] <fta> jcastro, updated the bug
[22:13] <asac> ccheney: yea. unfortunately we wont be there this cycle
[22:13] <asac> but we will kick it off default install i hope ;)
[22:13] <asac> for arm
[22:13] <asac> its just a nasty beast
[22:21] <gnomefreak> micahg: i fixed my ssh key and getting source now i will look at it and build it. do we really want to use the script for final release in Lucid?
[22:22] <gnomefreak> + rel=seamonkey-2.0_2.0.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~joe1~karmic  bothers me when running ./debian/rules....orig
[22:23] <gnomefreak> im hoping that is not name of final tarball
[22:23] <joe_l> gnomefreak,: hi
[22:23] <gnomefreak> hi joe_l :)
[22:23] <gnomefreak> ok is that the name of final tarball?
[22:23] <joe_l> I agree, that was just a recommendation from micah and would need to be fixed
[22:24] <micahg> gnomefreak: we generate all tarballs with get-orig-source now
[22:24] <gnomefreak> ok thats not a problem. I will build for Lucid and push to my PPA in the next few days
[22:24] <gnomefreak> micahg: yep
[22:24] <micahg> gnomefreak: we should probably review before it's pushed it lucid
[22:24] <joe_l> I through a few hacks that would make it easy to test my builds for right now.
[22:25] <gnomefreak> i just got your email
[22:25] <joe_l> agree, it needs review
[22:25] <gnomefreak> well so far it looks like its grabbing the right one but i will let you know if it ever finishes
[22:25] <joe_l> It seems as I was missing how hg checks out code. I thought I could use hg up TAG
[22:27] <micahg> k, I'm off, I'll be back around UTC 0:00 on Sunday..have a good night everyone
[22:27] <gnomefreak> oh micahg asac i found an extension i would like to add however i need to hear back from author to see if he will make a Linux version
[22:27] <gnomefreak> night micahg
[22:27] <joe_l> it looks like the pyton client.py checkout needs the comm-rev option as well
[22:27] <joe_l> night micahg
[22:28] <joe_l> micahg: thanks for all the help.
[22:29] <gnomefreak> ok who is monkey?
[22:29] <asac> not me ;)
[22:29] <mbana> i wish someone fixed this font issue
[22:29] <asac> not sure what that means ... must be slang
[22:30] <asac> mbana: i think until that happens we should ensure we get you a bot to post that message ;)
[22:30] <asac> every 4 hours
[22:30] <asac> or so
[22:30] <asac> :-P
[22:30] <asac> mbana: cant you workaround with fontconfig?
[22:31] <asac> afaik fontconfig still works somewhat
[22:31] <asac> just not the gnome setting part for hinting/antialiasing
[22:31] <mbana> im using fontconfig
[22:31] <mbana> it's ignored :(
[22:31] <gnomefreak> I found this in Ubuntuzilla today:
[22:32] <gnomefreak> im hating that more and more
[22:32] <mbana> is urs working
[22:34] <asac> mbana: would you be willing to loose everything if there is a chance that fonts might improve?
[22:34] <asac> :-P
[22:34] <mbana> ha
[22:35] <asac> worst case you have to fix things on console i guess ;)
[22:35] <asac> so i have
[22:35] <asac> ls -l /usr/lib/libcairo.so*
[22:35] <asac> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     21 2009-06-25 22:57 /usr/lib/libcairo.so -> libcairo.so.2.10800.8
[22:35] <asac> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     21 2009-06-25 22:57 /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2 -> libcairo.so.2.10800.8
[22:35] <asac> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 547284 2009-06-24 21:56 /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2.10800.8
[22:35] <asac> you probably have something similar
[22:35] <asac> idea is to move the /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2.10800.8 away
[22:35] <asac> and create a link to the libcairo.so shipped by ffox instead
[22:36] <asac> move the other file to a backup location so you can put it back in case everything goes crazy ;)
[22:36] <asac> if you are brave enough ... i would be interested about it ;)
[22:37] <asac> ok i am in busy mode now ... finishing stuff
[22:41] <gnomefreak> if he is going to keep doing bugs he needs to stop changing status to new
[22:43] <asac> ok i think i found the abrowser issue
[22:47]  * gnomefreak emailed monkey lets see what happens
[22:48] <asac> so monkey is active on bugs?
[22:48] <asac> good
[22:48] <asac> ;)
[22:48] <asac> get him join this channel :-P
[22:49] <gnomefreak> oh not sure about that :)
[22:49] <gnomefreak> im tired of going behind he
[22:49] <gnomefreak> him
[22:49] <gnomefreak> asac: what are we doing with 3.0 -> 3.6?
[22:49] <asac> we are doing it ;)
[22:49] <gnomefreak> hardy
[22:49] <asac> yes.
[22:49] <asac> we are doing it there
[22:49] <asac> but not before 3.0 goes EOL upstream
[22:49] <gnomefreak> ok
[22:50] <asac> until then we spend time on getting that tested and stuff
[22:50] <asac> and backporting things like extensions and so on
[22:50] <gnomefreak> right. well dec should have been it but they wanted to roll .18 out but there was a mail about this on mailing list today
[22:51] <asac> gnomefreak: url?
[22:51] <gnomefreak> asac: dont recall let me see if i still have it. it was on mailing list
[22:54] <gnomefreak> asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/360914/
[22:55] <gnomefreak> i ant find link to the full topic
[23:00] <gnomefreak> ok i have tarball so i can work on it in a few days or this weekend if i get time
[23:01] <gnomefreak> asac: bug 511019  what should we do with it. i dont think its firefox but ill let you decide
[23:01] <asac> fta: is it understood in any way how produce beta tarballs?
[23:01] <asac> for chromium?
[23:01] <asac> beta and dev
[23:01] <asac> chromium-browser$ cat debian/README.source | pastebinit
[23:01] <asac> http://pastebin.com/f77c10ed3
[23:01] <asac> fta: ^^
[23:01] <asac> i would like to add info how to get latest dev ... and latest beta there too
[23:02] <asac> (only current/latest snapshot are included)
[23:03] <fta> just CHANNEL={beta,dev}
[23:05] <fta> asac, ^^ or even CHANNEL=1.2.3.4
[23:05] <asac> fta: http://pastebin.com/f144c7fab
[23:05] <asac> thats with LOCAL_BRANCH
[23:05] <asac> is it fixed to auto create the folder on first run?
[23:06] <asac> ok let me add channels
[23:07] <fta> there were never any issue with LOCAL_BRANCH in chromium, the bug is in mozclient
[23:07] <asac> fta: get-current-source will just work (TM) ... even for stuff produced from channels?
[23:07] <asac> ah ok
[23:07] <fta> hm, not sure
[23:07] <fta> you need to test :)
[23:16] <fta> jcastro, wow, i have a lamp on my desk, i was watching a movie, i turned the lamp on, got gliches in the video, hmm, i turned it off to check if it was related, boom, X crashed. sounds like a vdpau craziness
[23:16] <gnomefreak> ok how do i get bzr to use nano instead of vim? nano is my default editor
[23:18] <asac> fta: http://pastebin.com/f429b20ae
[23:18]  * gnomefreak going to bed ill be back tomorrow
[23:20] <fta> asac, nice
[23:20] <asac> good. i think i will go for that
[23:20] <asac> wonder if i need to ship that explicitly
[23:23] <fta> asac, not if you call it README.Debian
[23:23] <fta> or list it in debian/chromium-browser.docs
[23:25] <fta> asac, btw, you call use lp:chromium-browser
[23:25] <fta> -call+can
[23:29] <asac> ok guess needs listing if thats supposed to be shipped
[23:29] <asac> ;)
[23:34] <fta> README.Debian is auto installed as a doc
[23:34] <fta> see man dh_installdocs
[23:36] <asac> thx for checking
[23:36] <asac> i want README.source though
[23:36] <asac> thats debian policy thing it seems :)
[23:38] <asac> fta: so i am going for  ../builds/chromium-browser-4.0.305.0~svn20100122r36862
[23:38] <asac> actually... why dont you make the release and do the upload?
[23:39] <asac> your line is so much faster :)
[23:39] <asac> i assume the latest dailies didnt break?
[23:39] <fta> i'm running it
[23:39] <asac> good ... what bzr revision got into those?
[23:40] <fta> 435
[23:40] <fta> nothing from today
[23:41] <fta> well, 4am
[23:41] <asac> hmm
[23:41] <asac> wow so i did 28 commits or so :)
[23:41] <asac> hehe
[23:41] <asac> maybe i should work in larger chunks
[23:46] <fta> asac, do you need to refresh the copyright file?
[23:46] <asac> fta: i dont think so
[23:46] <asac> is the MS-Pl thing still in problems?
[23:46] <asac> if not it should be fine
[23:46] <asac> or anything else with a license?
[23:47] <fta> what was the problem?
[23:47] <asac> well i really would like to know:
[23:47] <asac> src/chrome/test/data/layout_tests/LayoutTests/http/tests/xmlhttprequest/resources/
[23:47] <asac> fta: the .problems file i ment
[23:47] <asac> i had to wipe wtl headers (windows only confirmed in #chromium)
[23:47] <asac> because those had a microsoft license not compatible with GPL
[23:48] <asac> last commit should be against such a new tarball
[23:48] <asac> anyway ... just checked. its fine
[23:48] <asac> if you can find the licens for those tests i would be happy to whitelist that
[23:48] <asac> same for src/sandbox/linux/seccomp/
[23:48] <asac> but i thinkwe talked about that before
[23:49] <asac> fta: oh
[23:49] <asac> rc/third_party/gles2_book/
[23:49] <asac> that reappeared :(
[23:50] <fta> what is that? doesn't ring a bell
[23:50] <asac> ok removing that too in strip
[23:50] <asac> thats bad
[23:50] <asac> there are example files and pdfs with unknown origin nor license
[23:50] <asac> most likely proprietar
[23:50] <asac> e.g. a book
[23:50] <asac> with example code etc.
[23:51] <asac> seems we removed gles2_book_examples
[23:51] <asac> but not the gles2_book
[23:51] <asac> doing that now
[23:51] <fta> what is copyright.overlay needed for?
[23:51] <asac> fta: thats dead
[23:52] <asac> i commiteed the gles_book strip ... can you remove that and then produce
[23:52] <asac> the tarball and run one more time licensecheck.pl and copy the debian/copyright* files to the bzr tree etc. ;)
[23:52] <asac> ?
[23:52] <asac> e.g. update copyrights after new tarball
[23:53] <asac> with that we are done and lets push
[23:53] <asac> and hope ;)
[23:53] <fta> i should at least build it
[23:53] <asac> right
[23:53] <asac> ;)
[23:53] <asac> one try iwth all the crap i did
[23:54] <asac> maybe we should include the GPL things in .problems
[23:54] <asac> let me check how that owuld look like
[23:54] <fta> plz kill copyright.overlay
[23:55] <asac> oh ... run sh debian/licensegen.sh to update the copyrights on an unpacked build tree
[23:55] <asac> sorry
[23:55] <asac> yes killing
[23:57] <ccheney> so i hear that firefox will finally be able to isolate flash crashes in some 3.6 update
[23:58] <ccheney> next step after that is to just kill of flash altogether
[23:58] <fta> asac, ./debian/rules:58: unsupported target arch  - continuing anyway ???
[23:58] <ccheney> s/of/off/
[23:58] <ccheney> flash just crashed my 3.5.7
[23:58] <asac> ouch
[23:58] <asac> did i commit something there?
[23:58] <asac> hmm
[23:58] <asac> fta: the check is wrong :)
[23:58] <asac> x86
[23:59] <asac> ifeq (x86,$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU))
[23:59] <asac> GYP_DEFINES += target_arch=ia32
[23:59] <asac> else
[23:59] <asac> we should really move that to BUILD_CPU
[23:59] <fta> no it's fine, but when doing g-o-s, none of those vars are set