[00:00] <fta> $ dpkg-architecture | grep DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU
[00:00] <fta> DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=x86_64
[00:00] <asac> ah
[00:00] <asac> good that i didnt erro out then
[00:00] <asac> anyway, we need to use BUILD_CPU
[00:00] <asac> really!
[00:01] <asac> one sec ;)
[00:01] <asac> DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU=i386
[00:01] <asac> DEB_BUILD_GNU_CPU=i486
[00:01] <asac> the x86 i added is definitly wrong :)
[00:02] <asac> but maybe you are right about BUILD_GNU_CPU for target
[00:02] <asac> ;)
[00:03] <asac> i think DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU is used
[00:03] <asac> normally
[00:03] <fta> doesn't matter much, i don't use the values directly, i map them
[00:06] <asac> http://pastebin.com/f6396089b
[00:06] <asac> is that ok with you?
[00:06] <asac> why do we need to set target_arch?
[00:06] <asac> afaik thats set through uname -m in gyp
[00:06] <asac> not saying its wrong
[00:06] <fta> what good does it make? imho, it's useless, keep it as it is
[00:07] <asac> its currently broken :)
[00:07] <asac> also BUILD_ARCH is what is used by therse
[00:07] <asac> GNU_CPU is i486 for 32bit
[00:07] <asac> and maybe i586
[00:07] <asac> for others
[00:07] <asac> etc.
[00:07] <fta> target_arch is not auto set afaik
[00:08] <asac> its definitly in common.gyp
[00:08] <asac> anyway. i am 100% certain that BUILD_ARCH is right
[00:08] <fta> not in v8
[00:08] <asac> ok
[00:08] <asac> they said that will happen soon
[00:08] <asac> though i though that was about the new host_arch we added
[00:09] <fta> as you want, but update your warning too
[00:10] <asac> yes
[00:11] <asac> ok thats it
[00:11] <asac> hope that all is fine now
[00:11] <asac> thanks
[00:12] <asac> ok i will wade over to firefox now again ;)
[00:12] <asac> have to fix the abrowser match
[00:17] <fta> i still get the warning, but well, doesn't matter
[00:17] <asac> you get that warning during build?
[00:17] <asac> thought you said its not said for gos
[00:17] <asac> set
[00:17] <fta> donno yet
[00:17] <asac> ;)
[00:17] <asac> ok
[00:17] <asac> let me know
[00:17] <asac> it should be right ;)
[00:19] <fta> X crashed, again
[00:19] <asac> heh
[00:19] <asac> i didnt even have time to upgrade to lucid on laptop yet :(
[00:23]  * asac checks how bad ppa builders are
[00:24] <asac> crowded
[00:24] <asac> maybe we should really kill the intrepid dailies :)
[00:29] <fta> not enough builders, just 4
[00:32] <LLStarks|Lazy> asac, you there?
[00:32] <LLStarks|Lazy> fontconfig is still quite broken in lucid.
[00:33] <LLStarks|Lazy> example: http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/5732/fontsd.png
[00:42] <asac> ok
[00:43] <fta> asac, ftbfs
[00:45] <LLStarks|Lazy> what do i do?
[00:45] <LLStarks|Lazy> font packs don't help
[00:46] <asac> fta: details?
[00:47] <fta> asac, nothing to worry about, ftbfs in webkit with r36926.
[00:47] <fta> asac, but r36927 reads "Revert "WebKit roll 53704 -> 53712. This reverts commit r36920"
[00:48] <asac> ok
[00:48] <asac> good
[00:48] <asac> ;)
[00:49] <asac> will this block todays uplload?
[00:49] <fta> i'm rolling out another tarball
[00:50] <fta> while watching The Day the Earth Stood Still
[00:55] <BUGabundo> fta: nice movie
[01:00] <fta> BUGabundo, too many ads in there
[01:01] <BUGabundo> where?
[01:01] <fta> BUGabundo, windows, toyota, mcdonalds
[01:01] <BUGabundo> eheh
[01:02] <BUGabundo> somehitng has to pay that guy cache
[01:02] <fta> -toyota+honda
[01:02] <fta> it's too obvious
[01:03] <BUGabundo> LOL
[01:03] <BUGabundo> no no,.... you are just stressing on it
[01:03] <BUGabundo> ignore
[01:03] <BUGabundo> watch the movie it self
[01:04] <BUGabundo> if you are so sensible
[01:04] <BUGabundo> you are going to be the 1st person I tell not to watch AVATAR
[01:04] <BUGabundo> everyone else *should* go out and see it
[01:04] <BUGabundo> AWESOME movie
[01:12] <LLStarks> for once, i really gotta say this: **** google
[01:12] <LLStarks> h264 over theora?
[01:12] <LLStarks> what the hell.
[01:12] <asac> is that news?
[01:13] <LLStarks> i guess.
[01:14] <LLStarks> 3.6 and 3.7 won't be able to use youtube html5
[01:14] <asac> ah youtube
[01:14] <asac> thought you are talking about chromium
[01:14] <asac> yes, thats sucks much *shrug*
[01:15] <LLStarks> mozilla can't package h264, right?
[01:15] <fta> not can't, but don't want to
[01:15] <asac> not sure. afaiui we can have that in multiverse
[01:15] <LLStarks> licensing problems?
[01:15] <gavin> can't legally distribute it without a license
[01:15] <asac> they want to keep the web based on open formats
[01:16] <asac> and distribution might also be a problem
[01:16] <LLStarks> h264. open. pick one.
[01:16] <gavin> and even if we were to get a license, would only be valid for moco-distributed builds
[01:16] <gavin> which isn't really acceptable
[01:16] <asac> but from what i understood the idea was to keep up the spirit of making the web a better place :)
[01:16] <asac> right
[01:16] <asac> so each distributor would have to find its own way around it etc.
[01:16] <LLStarks> could html5 work with ffh264?
[01:16] <asac> sure, but its a proprietary format
[01:17] <asac> the idea is that we dont want that anymore ;)
[01:17] <gavin> the decoding code isn't the problem
[01:17] <gavin> *finding* the code isn't the problem, Imean
[01:17] <asac> sure. we even ship it in multiverse
[01:17] <asac> thats all doable. but still not great ;)
[01:17] <LLStarks> how? firefox-nonfree?
[01:17] <BUGabundo> but so far  OGV is license free
[01:18] <asac> rather a plugin to ffmpeg or gstreamer
[01:18] <asac> and then the current mechanism we have to install stuff on demand
[01:18] <BUGabundo> and google is benchmarking and of course close codec is faster
[01:18] <asac> e.g. when you first hit a video wiht a non-free codec that is in multiverse you get asked to install it
[01:18] <asac> (thtas what we do in totem, gnash etc.)
[01:18] <gavin> the differences between theora and h264 at youtube-level bitrates aren't that great
[01:20] <fta> asac,   LINK(target) out/Release/chrome
[01:20] <asac> cool
[01:20] <asac> i think we are in good shape then ;)
[01:20] <asac> if it starts at least
[01:21] <fta> bummer
[01:21] <fta> you broke it
[01:21] <fta> install 755 debian/chromium-browser.sh debian/tmp/usr/bin/chromium-browser
[01:21] <fta> install: target `debian/tmp/usr/bin/chromium-browser' is not a directory
[01:21] <fta> make: *** [common-install-prehook-impl] Error 1
[01:23] <fta> asac, ^^
[01:23] <fta> i used cp for a reason
[01:23] <BUGabundo> ehe
[01:24] <fta> reverting..
[01:25] <asac> urgh
[01:25] <asac> toomuch stuff in a row i guess :(
[01:27] <fta> yeah, especially without testing it :(
[01:28] <fta> dpkg-deb: building package `chromium-browser' in `../chromium-browser_4.0.305.0~svn20100123r36929-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb'.
[01:28] <fta> oh, damn, amd64. i can't test it here
[01:30] <asac> i can run the .deb if you make it available somewhere (through ssh)
[01:30] <asac> you should have a people.ubuntu.com sftp space btw
[01:30] <asac> not sure if you know ;)
[01:32] <asac> oh we only have 4 ppa builders atm
[01:32] <asac> that explains it ;)
[01:35] <fta> asac, "i should have" as in "would be nice if i had one" or in "i already have one without knowing it"?
[01:36] <asac> fta: you ... as a ubuntu member (through ubuntu-dev) have a people.ubuntu.com account where you can put stuff ;)
[01:36] <asac> not me
[01:36] <fta> where is that?
[01:36] <asac> i got a permanent redirect to people.canonical.com
[01:36] <asac> because i had some python services running ;)
[01:37] <asac> fta: i think you can just try sftp people.ubuntu.com
[01:37] <asac> with your ssh key from launchpad
[01:37] <asac>  ;)
[01:37] <asac> at least i think that is done now
[01:37] <asac> could be wrong, but the redirect to canonical has happened a acouple of month back
[01:37] <asac> so i suspect the transition is done
[01:38] <fta> i see public_html
[01:38] <asac> right
[01:38] <asac> you can put files in there
[01:38] <asac> and then you can browser people.ubuntu.com/~fta
[01:38] <asac> http://people.ubuntu.com/~fta/chromium/
[01:38] <asac> ;)
[01:38] <asac> not sure what the quoat is ;)
[01:39] <asac> hope its enough for one .deb
[01:39] <BUGabundo> 1GB I think
[01:39] <BUGabundo> I never used it either
[01:39] <BUGabundo> I love Dropbox tooo much
[01:39] <BUGabundo> haven't picked up U1 for a LONGGGG time
[01:41] <fta> 94096786 bytes transferred in 9 seconds (10.04M/s)
[01:41] <asac> heh
[01:41] <asac> nice
[01:42] <asac> just found out that my amd64 box got stuck in the middle of a dist-upgrade
[01:42] <asac> asking debconf stuff
[01:42] <asac> lets see how long it takes to finish now ;)
[01:43] <fta> BUGabundo, if you're willing to test those debs quickly..
[01:45] <BUGabundo> too sleepy to do any guud testing
[01:48] <asac> ok installing
[01:50] <asac> fta:
[01:50] <asac> chromium-browser
[01:50] <asac> [17608:17608:474887276687:FATAL:chrome/browser/zygote_host_linux.cc(117)] The SUID sandbox helper binary was found, but is not configured correctly. Rather than run without sandboxing I'm aborting now. You need to make sure that /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser-sandbox is mode 4755 and owned by root.
[01:50] <asac> Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)
[01:50] <asac> maybe i didnt install enough?
[01:50]  * asac checks
[01:50] <asac> i install -browser and -l10n
[01:51] <asac> -rwsr-xr-x 1 1234 1234 14672 2010-01-23 02:27 /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser-sandbox
[01:51] <fta> should be root
[01:51] <asac> oh
[01:51] <asac> the user is messed up
[01:51] <asac> hmm
[01:51] <asac> fs error?
[01:51] <fta> oh, n-m, i re-run dpkg-buildpackage without asking for fakeroot
[01:52] <asac> no its 1234
[01:52] <asac> ;)
[01:52] <asac> ouch
[01:52] <asac> guess -nc should be ok
[01:52] <fta> pbuilder uses 1234
[01:52] <asac> good to know
[01:52] <fta> just chown root:root it
[01:52] <fta> and re-add the +s
[01:52] <asac> sure
[01:53] <asac> there it is
[01:53] <asac> working
[01:53] <asac> fine
[01:54] <asac> i can zoom on google maps ;)
[01:54] <asac> feels good enough ;)
[01:55] <BUGabundo> LOL
[01:55] <BUGabundo> great QA :p
[01:58] <BUGabundo> [reed]: wishbug: make FF do inline URL autocomplete like Chromium. its indeed nicer. but PLEASE keep awesome bar as PERFECT as it is... chromium needs to improve theirs
[02:02] <fta> asac, http://paste.ubuntu.com/360980/
[02:04] <asac> i see at least one UNKNOWN going
[02:04] <asac> an no new coming ;)
[02:05] <asac> oh problems is included
[02:05] <asac> cool 5 less ;)
[02:05] <asac> err 4
[02:05] <asac> fta: do all those changes make sense?
[02:06] <asac> there is quite a few copyright changes
[02:06] <asac> not really in a single subtree, but spreaded
[02:06] <asac> oh
[02:06] <asac> out/
[02:06] <asac> very good
[02:06] <asac> thanks
[02:06] <asac> we should include that in licensecheck
[02:06] <asac> exclude
[02:06] <fta> seems like a lot of changes, when did you last run it?
[02:07] <asac> like on a traball produced a few hours ago ;)
[02:07] <asac> the problems diff makes sense though
[02:07] <asac> chromium-browser-4.0.305.0~svn20100122r36862/
[02:08] <asac> maybe they did a new bump round?
[02:08] <asac> for third party?
[02:08] <asac> it doesnt really look suspiciously wrong
[02:09] <asac> the out/ ones were garbage so great that they are gone now
[02:09] <fta> why is the icu-license removed?
[02:09] <asac> because it was there twice
[02:09] <fta> ok
[02:09] <asac> i had it in harzbuff-license snippet file by accident
[02:09] <asac> ;)
[02:09] <asac> there is ICU-License still
[02:11] <asac> i assumed all the combinations are combinable by the reader ;)
[02:12] <asac> maybe having a "update copyright" rule that gets run on source production would be great
[02:13] <fta> i wanted to do that but you don't want g-o-s to commit on the branch
[02:14] <fta> ok, i'm ready to close & push
[02:14] <asac> i am more thinking about updating when preparing a real upload
[02:14] <asac> to archive
[02:14] <asac> fta: go ahead.
[02:14] <asac> lets cross fingers
[02:14] <asac> on monday we will see ;)
[02:15] <asac> what we should do to be prepared for battle is file the .problems we still have + a GPL (unversioned) special report upstream
[02:16] <fta> done
[02:16] <asac> ;)
[02:16] <asac> cheers
[02:18] <asac> would be great if you could check at some point why my check for == 1 doesnt work
[02:18] <asac> == 0 doesnt work either
[02:18] <asac> ;)
[02:18] <asac> i can look sometimes next days otherwise
[02:18] <asac> i was sure it was working at some point :-P
[02:19] <asac> but i guess i didnt copy the final rev over
[02:22] <asac> there it is ;)
[02:22] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+queue
[02:22] <asac> fresh and NEW :-P
[02:22] <asac> fta: thx. 'night
[02:23]  * asac wonders if he should still wait for the final ffox to finish ;)
[02:23] <asac> *fail*
[02:25] <BUGabundo> asac: go play instead akinator.com
[02:25] <BUGabundo> I bet you gonna get as hook as I am
[02:25] <asac> heh
[02:25] <asac> hope not ;)
[02:26] <fta> https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+queue?queue_text=chromium-browser
[02:29] <BUGabundo> asac: give it a try
[02:29] <BUGabundo> and let me know if he got it right
[02:32] <asac> the url isnt responsive to my netzone
[02:32] <BUGabundo> yeah
[02:32] <BUGabundo> its trotling here now too
[02:32] <BUGabundo> was fine a min ago
[02:32] <asac> in other words ... its *dead* for me ;)
[02:32] <BUGabundo> strangely subdmains are fine
[02:32] <BUGabundo> pt.akinator.com works
[02:33] <BUGabundo> fr.akinator.com too
[02:33] <BUGabundo> http://de.akinator.com/ too
[02:35] <BUGabundo> LOLOLOLOLOL
[02:35] <BUGabundo> I tried to "guess" asac and it got "Linus Torvalds"
[02:35] <asac> also slow
[02:35] <asac> dont get anything
[02:35] <BUGabundo> asac: you older then 30 ?
[02:37] <BUGabundo> 2nd try : Jostein Gaarder
[02:37] <BUGabundo> lol
[02:37] <asac> not for me
[02:38] <asac> doing something else and then crashing
[02:38] <BUGabundo> 3rd Dan Brown
[02:38] <BUGabundo> :(
[02:38] <BUGabundo> try tomorrow
[02:38] <BUGabundo> prob temporaly down
[02:38] <BUGabundo> or learn portuguese-brasilion
[02:38] <BUGabundo> :p
[02:38] <asac> maybe
[02:38] <BUGabundo> http://pt.akinator.com/ is up and running
[02:52] <BUGabundo>   PID MINFLT MAJFLT      VSTEXT  VSIZE  RSIZE  VGROW  RGROW  MEM CMD     1/3
[02:52] <BUGabundo> 31621     32      0      34080K 978.7M 197.8M   100K   108K   5% chromium-brows
[02:52] <BUGabundo>  5057     31      0         73K 652.9M 191.7M    64K   124K   5% firefox-3.7
[02:52] <BUGabundo> 31548   8165      0        920K   1.2G 141.2M 90128K   580K   4% pidgin
[02:52] <BUGabundo> 32367      0      0       2130K 739.3M 103.4M     0K     0K   3% gwibber
[02:52] <BUGabundo> 32316     25      0       4941K 246.7M 94460K   100K   100K   2% nxagent
[02:52] <BUGabundo> never seen Chromium sucking so much
[02:53] <BUGabundo> and that two winds and a total of 3 tabs
[02:53] <fta> i'd like to see "20y after the day the earth stood still" now
[02:54] <BUGabundo> ahaahahaha
[03:46] <DanaG> hmm, odd use case: firefox-3.6 profile directory symlinked to "firefox".
[03:46] <DanaG> Result of migrator: it moves firefox to firefox-3.5-abandoned... and moves firefox-3.6 to firefox.
[03:57] <BUGabundo> asac_: fta: ^^^^^^^
[04:02] <DanaG> actually, it ended up as "replaced", not "abandoned".
[04:44] <mahfouz1> /usr/lib/firefox-3.6.1pre/firefox-*bin
[04:44] <mahfouz1> now I have this thing in my apparmor profile but still doesn't work
[06:51] <juanb> how do i install the latest official version of firefox (3.6) in a ubuntu netbook remix environment?  or where can i find that information?
[12:15] <blaamann> Thanks for the update. 3.6.1 works again (after apparmor reload)
[12:48] <LLStarks> asac_, since 3.6.1 will have new features, would the new drop-in update work allow 11th freeze exemptions for firefox updates? or is the idea to stick with 3.6 and then update after release?
[14:19] <asac_> LLStarks: its only 3.6.1 in the daily ppa ... the problem was on packaging side, so the issue is also fixed in the 3.6 i am uploading
[14:20] <asac_> not sure what you mean by "freeze exemption" ... if you ask whether we will update to 3.6.1 in lucid when its out then the answer is yes
[14:23] <White_Sloun> it seems that on ubuntu 9.04 you dont need to call apparmor_parser with -W -T
[14:24] <asac_> White_Sloun: dont need ... or can't ?
[14:24] <asac_> e.g. is it broken?
[14:24] <White_Sloun> cant :)
[14:24] <asac_> or just doesnt hurt
[14:24] <asac_> hmm
[14:24] <asac_> ok
[14:24] <asac_> jdstrand: ^^
[14:24] <White_Sloun> there is no such options in manpages of jaunty
[14:25] <asac_> White_Sloun: so postinstall fails?
[14:29] <White_Sloun> yesterday i wrote the output of apt-get install to this channel
[14:30] <asac_> yeah
[14:30] <asac_> ok
[14:37] <asac_> 10:38 < White_Sloun> hi, I get a little bug in firefox-3.6 installing from PPA http://pastebin.com/f45d7c4b0
[14:37] <asac_> jdstrand: ^^ ... thats apparmor going wild in <= 9.04
[14:40] <asac_> font cairo issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541319
[14:40] <asac_> fta: ^^
[14:41] <fta> asac_, please answer to that guy, i don't know the details of your changes
[14:48] <asac_> done
[14:50] <fta> thanks
[15:27] <asac_> bumped mm debhelper compat level to 7
[15:27] <asac_> not sure what that gains us, but lots of folks are pretty hard about dh 7
[15:27] <asac_> pretty strong feelings i mean
[15:44] <maxb> The "dh" sequence-running command is the flagship feature of dh7
[15:47] <asac_> dont know ... i was even asked to bump compa level to 7 for a cdbs package ;)
[15:47] <asac_> compat
[15:47] <asac_> no clue how that helps there
[15:47] <asac_> ok uploading 3.6 to lucid ... lets hope it doesnt get stuck in NEW
[15:48] <fta> it doesn't
[15:49] <fta> does hardy support v7?
[15:49] <maxb> via hardy-backports
[15:49] <fta> asac_, ^^, so it's bad for the ppa
[15:53]  * sebner makes a dance ~o~ asac_ finally uploading :P
[16:03] <asac_> fta: modemmanager doesnt build for < karmic anyway
[16:03] <asac_> libudev and crack like that
[16:04] <fta> oh, thought it was for ff
[16:04] <asac_> ok the upload got stalled
[16:04] <asac_> trying again
[16:04] <asac_> fta: no :-Ü
[16:05] <asac_> firefox package is too ugly to get to such a level when discussing it ;)
[16:05] <asac_> maybe it should be rewritten ... lol
[16:31] <fta>   - chromium-browser (4.0.295.0~r35884 -> 4.0.302.2~r36665) [85.79MB (+1023kB, +1.19%)]
[16:31] <fta> dev channel
[16:35] <sebner> asac_: ~~~ NEW ~~~
[16:35] <asac_> :(
[16:35] <asac_> yes
[16:35] <asac_> thats sad
[16:35] <asac_> i was sure that it wouldnt go to new as the same source is still in pool
[16:36] <asac_> but then i dont know soyuz that well
[16:40] <fta> asac_, :( http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38306001/buildlog_ubuntu-karmic-lpia.chromium-browser_4.0.302.2~r36665-0ubuntu1~ucd1~karmic_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[16:42] <asac_> guess they fixed the bug?
[16:42] <asac_> or just diverged?
[16:42] <asac_> hope the former
[16:43]  * asac_ checks
[16:43] <asac_> gclient sync
[16:48] <asac_> fta: yes, we can drop it
[16:48] <asac_> shall i?
[16:48]  * asac_ checks if fta already did that
[16:49] <asac_> fta: err
[16:49] <asac_> that thing isnt in there anymore
[16:50] <asac_> rev 430
[16:50] <asac_>   * drop m32 armel patch after upstream made this 'target_arch=arm AND host_arch=x64' only
[16:50] <asac_>     - update debian/patches/series
[16:50] <asac_>     - delete debian/patches/drop_armel_m32.patch
[16:57] <fta> asac_, dev channel, not head
[16:57] <asac_> hmm
[16:57] <asac_> so they cherry picked there?
[16:57] <asac_> thought otherwise the version woul dmove aead of the versoin we had that dropped it in .head
[16:58] <asac_> or do you have more branches?
[16:58] <fta> i have 3 branches
[16:58] <asac_> how are they moving forward?
[16:59] <fta> the bot does the upgrades, and one in a while, i merge from head manually
[17:00] <fta> last merge was a few days ago
[17:03] <asac_> ok so i guess today was merge day ;)
[17:04] <asac_> do you follow release planning on when next beta might happen?
[17:04] <fta> nope, today was the bot upgrade
[17:05] <asac_> but the armel patch failed ;) ... you could have merged everything
[17:05] <asac_> so next time we could upload from dev channel to archive
[17:06] <fta> it was still needed before the upgrade
[17:10] <fta> yep, the bunch of commits from yesterday needs be merged down to the 2 channels
[17:10] <fta> feel free
[18:03] <asac> fta: noticed a minor issue on the bot version bumping logic:
[18:03] <asac> modemmanager 0.3-2~nmt1~jaunty
[18:03] <asac> that should be 0.3-1ubuntu1~nmt1~jaunty
[18:04] <asac> e.g. if its a debian revision, append ubuntu1 rather than bump
[18:04] <fta> hm
[18:04] <asac> otherwise the 1ubuntu1 upload that would follow as a deviation would be lower
[18:04] <asac> at least for an ubuntu bot ;)
[18:05] <asac> oh
[18:05] <asac> heh
[18:05] <asac> nevermind
[18:05] <asac> nevermind the oh i mean
[18:05] <asac> the version package revision thing i suggested still holds
[18:08] <fta> the bot is supposed to be dist agnostic
[18:08] <asac> yes, but its wrong
[18:08] <asac> you can say -1bot1
[18:08] <asac> if you want to have it distro agnostic ;)
[18:09] <asac> currently its debian only as you move ahead of what would be the next ubuntu upload
[18:10] <asac> or rather than saying: "bump + ~nmt1..."
[18:10] <asac> you can just say "+ .nmt1
[18:10] <asac> "
[18:10] <asac> does that work?
[18:10] <asac> so in this case it would be 0.3-1.nmt1~jaunty
[18:10] <asac> if you do
[18:10] <asac> 0.3-1.0nmt1~jaunty
[18:11] <asac> then it might even be nice to non-maintainer debian upload versions
[18:11] <asac> that would go for 1.1
[18:11] <fta> i mean, i want to keep the option to do a debian only package, or an ubuntu only package, without specifying anything in the conf. your case is special
[18:12] <fta> so i can add a knob to force the bot to always produce an ubuntu version
[18:12] <asac> hmm
[18:12] <asac> dpkg --compare-versions 0.3-1ubuntu1 gt 0.3-1.0nmt || echo false
[18:12] <asac> false
[18:13] <asac> so debian and ubuntu are not really unconnected
[18:13] <asac> packages that are debian come down to ubuntu
[18:13] <asac> and get modified there
[18:13] <asac> i hope there is a way to do it in a way thats good for everything ;)
[18:14] <asac> anyway. not important
[18:14] <asac> corner case
[18:14] <asac> maybe some thinking gives us a better idea
[18:17] <asac> ppa builders are really swamped
[18:17] <asac> i guess my final build for -stable doesnt make it soon :-P
[18:17] <asac> i386  3   601 jobs (33 hours)
[18:18] <fta> lol
[18:18] <asac> probably NEWing on monday will happen before that ;)
[18:18] <nasam> Why is the package firefox-3.5 at version 3.6?
[18:18] <asac> thats a transitional package
[18:18] <asac> its empty
[18:18] <fta> http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/01/bumps-ahead-as-vimeo-youtube-respond-to-html5-video-demand.ars
[18:19] <asac> just ensuring that firefox-3.5 users get upgraded to 3.6
[18:19] <asac> nasam: you can remove it after the upgrade
[18:19] <asac> otherwise update-manager will probably remove it at some point
[18:20] <asac> bdrung_: so we have a new SOL for the firefox package ;)
[18:20] <asac> 3.6
[18:20] <nasam> Ok, but still I can't have firefox 3.5 (from ubuntu) next to firefox 3.6 (from this daily)
[18:20] <asac> right
[18:20] <asac> because firefox 3.6 will take over evertything
[18:20] <asac> in ubuntu as well
[18:21] <asac> just a matter of time
[18:21] <asac> daily just projects what will happen
[18:21] <nasam> Yeah, but not in Karmic?
[18:21] <asac> in karmic it will eventually happen too. yes.
[18:22] <asac> we are moving to a new approach. the versions are not scalable enough for what we want
[18:22] <asac> nasam: so by using it you help getting best stuff. if you dont want dailies, we will have a firefox-stable ppa soon
[18:23] <asac> where you have the final 3.6 versions
[18:23] <nasam> Hm, that will be nice :p
[18:23] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable
[18:23] <asac> thats it
[18:23] <asac> i am currently building the bits in a secret ppa
[18:23] <asac> and when they look good push them over
[18:23] <asac> probably not in the next 24 hours though
[18:23] <asac> builders are swamped
[18:23] <asac> so takes a bit to build them
[18:24] <asac> https://edge.launchpad.net/builders
[18:30] <bdrung_> asac: new SOL?
[18:33] <asac> bdrung_: yes, starting with firefox-3.6 the main package will be firefox again
[18:33] <asac> for the stable release channel
[18:33] <bdrung_> aha
[18:33] <asac> not sure what to do about the versioning ;)
[18:33] <asac> just wanted to warn you :)
[18:34] <bdrung_> i am not sure, if i like the new mozilla policy
[18:34] <asac> you mean mozillas policy or our?
[18:34] <bdrung_> mozillas
[18:35] <asac> problem is that there is no real policy yet
[18:36] <asac> at least not a fully fleshed out one
[18:36] <asac> causes sleepless nights on my side ;)
[18:36] <bdrung_> ;)
[18:36] <asac> ok .... have to run. night life
[18:36] <asac> ttyl
[18:37] <bdrung_> cul8r
[18:48] <mbana> asac: hi, just wondering if u've tried it urself
[19:57] <mahfouz> I can complain as much as I want, firefox will not start anymore :(
[19:58] <mahfouz> switched to 3.7 now
[19:58] <mahfouz> can you tell me which line I shld add to the profile?
[19:58] <mahfouz> the apparmor profile I mean
[19:59] <fta> dmesg | grep firefox | pastebinit
[19:59] <fta> and see the topic
[20:07] <mahfouz> i did the complain in the topic
[20:07] <mahfouz> didn't help
[20:09] <mahfouz> http://paste2.org/p/628203
[20:11] <mahfouz> it says "Skipping profile in /etc/apparmor.d/disable: usr.bin.firefox" in the update from 1min ago
[20:11] <mahfouz> but still doesn't work
[20:17] <mahfouz> couldn't it be something other than apparmor?
[20:18] <mahfouz> http://paste2.org/p/628258
[20:18] <jdstrand> mahfouz: the apparmor profile should not be affecting it based on the 'Skipping profile...'
[20:18] <jdstrand> mahfouz: you can be sure by running 'sudo aa-status'
[20:19] <mahfouz> http://paste2.org/p/628263
[20:20] <jdstrand> mahfouz: you are using 3.7?
[20:20] <mahfouz> yes
[20:20] <mahfouz> you mean I shld close 3.7
[20:20] <mahfouz> wait
[20:20] <jdstrand> mahfouz: there is no profile loaded for 3.7
[20:20] <mahfouz> shld there be?
[20:20] <jdstrand> mahfouz: not by default
[20:21] <jdstrand> mahfouz: if you are having trouble with 3.7, it is not apparmor
[20:21] <mahfouz> I used 3,7 for a while now
[20:21] <mahfouz> no I have trouble with 3,6
[20:21] <mahfouz> which is now "firefox" = 3.6
[20:21]  * jdstrand nods
[20:21] <mahfouz> I can start 3.7 but not 3.6
[20:21] <mahfouz> ever since "firefox" became 3.6
[20:22] <jdstrand> ok, then that might be apparmor
[20:22] <jdstrand> mahfouz: do you have the latest daily?
[20:22] <mahfouz> yes
[20:23] <mahfouz> just updated 5min ago
[20:23] <jdstrand> mahfouz: please perform the following commands:
[20:23] <mahfouz> ok
[20:23] <jdstrand> sudo apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox
[20:24] <mahfouz> did
[20:24] <mahfouz> no output
[20:24] <jdstrand> mahfouz: can you paste the output of 'sudo aa-status'
[20:25] <mahfouz> http://paste2.org/p/628270
[20:25] <mahfouz> the complaint is gone
[20:27] <jdstrand> mahfouz: can you paste the output of 'ls /etc/apparmor.d'?
[20:28] <mahfouz> http://paste2.org/p/628289
[20:28] <jdstrand> mahfouz: please run the following commands:
[20:28] <jdstrand> sudo apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6
[20:29] <jdstrand> mahfouz: then paste the output of 'sudo aa-status'
[20:29] <mahfouz> ok, now 3.6 is not in enforce mode anymore
[20:29] <jdstrand> correct
[20:29] <mahfouz> http://paste2.org/p/628307
[20:30] <jdstrand> mahfouz: ok good-- let's now clean up a little:
[20:30] <jdstrand> sudo rm /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6 /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6~
[20:31] <mahfouz> ok, they're gone
[20:31] <mahfouz> note that 3.5 profile is also obsolete
[20:31] <jdstrand> mahfouz: do you want to have the apparmor profile for 3.6 disable on boot?
[20:31] <mahfouz> whatever the standard is
[20:32] <jdstrand> mahfouz: the default is disabled (there was a bug a while ago that caused dailies to be enabled)
[20:32] <jdstrand> mahfouz: to disable on boot, please perform the following command:
[20:32] <mahfouz> yes, it works now
[20:32] <mahfouz> I can start "firefox"
[20:33] <jdstrand> sudo ln -s /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox
[20:34] <mahfouz> ln: creating symbolic link `/etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox': File exists
[20:34] <jdstrand> mahfouz: can you give the output of this command:
[20:35] <jdstrand> ls -l /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox
[20:35] <mahfouz> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 2010-01-21 19:22 /etc/apparmor.d/disable/usr.bin.firefox -> /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox
[20:35] <mahfouz> it's root
[20:35] <jdstrand> ok good
[20:36] <jdstrand> to verify it will not be loaded on boot, please perform:
[20:36] <jdstrand> sudo apparmor_parser -r /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox
[20:36] <jdstrand> sudo aa-status
[20:36] <jdstrand> mahfouz: you should see a 'Skipping' line and aa-status should not list firefox in its output
[20:37] <mahfouz> skipping line on the first command yes
[20:37] <mahfouz> then 3.6 now longer shows up in aa-status
[20:37] <jdstrand> ok, then you are back to defaults
[20:37] <mahfouz> so what was the problem?
[20:38] <mahfouz> did I catch a wrong upgrade?
[20:38] <jdstrand> mahfouz: I can't say for sure, but it sounds like a long time ago the profile got enabled (due to that bug I mentioned), then the name transition from firefox-3.6 -> firefox got you before we had a chance to fix the profile
[20:39] <mahfouz> ok, thx
[20:39] <mahfouz> I'll let you know if it shows up again
[20:39] <jdstrand> k
[20:41] <jdstrand> asac: apparmor_parser '-W -T' is new in karmic (for binary caching of the profiles). 9.04 and lower can leave that out
[20:42] <jdstrand> asac: technically, -W -T should not be needed in lucid either (there was a bug in karmic that required it)
[22:48] <BUGabundo> boas
[23:02] <fta> hm, it seems the new vdpau survives sdl now, great