[00:18] asac: how can I help? [01:40] maxb: http://honk.sigxcpu.org/con/Iceowl_extensions_1_0b1_in_experimental.html [03:46] asac: you on? [06:27] hmm.. when will firefox 3.6 land in lucid? [06:27] vish: when it's ready ;) [06:27] ;p [07:22] asac: let's talk in the morning...I think I have TB3 merged again, but I have a slight problem [08:41] what about thunderbird 3? [11:08] vish: ffox36 is in NEW ... so waits for archive admin kick [11:09] * vish ha.. so asac *can* see me ;) [11:09] one sec ;) [11:11] https://edge.launchpad.net/~asac/+archive/sandbox/+packages [11:11] vish: can you try to upgrade to them? ... if so i will copy them to the new firefox-stable ppa [11:11] * vish tires [11:11] just add that ppa and run dist-upgrade [11:12] and post what apt wants to do ;) [11:13] interestingly the amd64 builders queue somehow managed to catch up over night [11:30] where is the official 3.6 release pushed first (ppa, any repo)? [11:32] hifi: its stuck in NEW ... so it will be first in firefox-stable ppa [11:32] https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable [11:33] thanks, it'll be just a day or so when it's available? [11:37] tigger? [11:37] nice. [11:38] hifi: atm i hope in 1h ;) [11:38] but if the latest package is bad it can take indefinitly longer [11:39] asac: dist-upgrade says nothing to be upgraded... your sandbox is in the new repos [11:40] asac: ah, cool :) [11:40] sandbox firefox stuff* [11:41] vish: if you are running dailies then thats expected [11:41] daily is ahead of 3.6 final [11:42] asac: ..., i'm on lucid main [11:42] i dont have the dailies [11:42] vish: apt-cache policy firefox [11:42] i am using lucid main too [11:42] and just doing the same [11:42] i get [11:42] http://paste.ubuntu.com/361876/ [11:43] and http://paste.ubuntu.com/361877/ (for policy) [11:43] asac: > http://paste.ubuntu.com/361878/ [11:44] vish: you use pinning ;) [11:44] 600 http://archive.ubuntu.com lucid/main Packages [11:44] asac: argh! i forgot [11:44] drop your pinning [11:44] :-P [11:44] :s , thanks for pointing it out ;) [11:45] let me know if the upgrade wents smooth [11:46] asac: yay > http://paste.ubuntu.com/361880/ upgrading ;) [11:47] cool [11:52] vish: upgrade finished? [11:53] * asac copies to stable ppa once vish confirms ;) [11:56] asac: worked , but weird , that it didnt check for add-on updates/compatibility , but rather just said add-ons incompatible [11:56] i had to check manually [11:56] interesting [11:57] oh , crappy firefox fonts again :s [11:57] hifi: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable/ ... in a few minutes [11:58] vish: yes [11:58] we filed upstream bug already ... it happens because we dont use system-cairo anymore [11:58] 15:40 < asac_> font cairo issue: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541319 [11:58] Mozilla bug 541319 in Graphics "Poor subpixel font rendering compared to rest of system in FF3.6 on Ubuntu" [Normal,New] [12:00] * vish digs for workarounds [12:01] i dont think there are any ... besides maybe making a link to the firefox libcairo for /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2.10800.8 [12:01] asac: thank you! [12:01] but that might make whole desktop to crash ;) ... so be prepared for battle [12:01] hifi: oh. its only karmic and lucid for now [12:01] hardy and jaunty will follow soonish ;) [12:03] Hi! [12:04] With a proposed update, the asturian language was updated [12:04] and then firefox not run any more [12:04] asac: I run lucid :) [12:04] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/511837 [12:04] Ubuntu bug 511837 in language-pack-ast "Latest language pack in 'karmic-proposed' breaks Firefox in Asturian" [Undecided,New] [12:05] Any idea about the origin of the problem? what string? [12:07] marquinos: please check with ArneGoetje in -desktop [12:07] asac: it works [12:09] great [12:09] enjoy [12:09] will do, thank you very much :) [12:10] asac, I don't undertand you :$ Where can I check with ArneGoetje? in irc? [12:10] marquinos: #ubuntu-desktop [12:10] he is probably not there till tomorrow [12:10] yes irc [12:11] i dont know exactly whats going on. but we moved the langpack creation thing to a different server [12:11] so it might have something to do with that [12:11] ok ;) [12:11] Thanks asac ! [12:11] :) [12:11] np [12:12] asac: btw. will that ppa always track upstream stable faster? [12:12] yes [12:12] thats the idea [12:13] delay was due to the fact that we did a big refactoring of the packaging [12:28] hmm, what kind of video formats firefox 3.6 supports by default [12:29] yeah, ogg only [13:00] fta: do you have a stable m-devscript in some ppa? [13:01] i need to binary copy that to firefox-stable to hardy [13:01] didnt really want to copy umd [13:03] guess i should just copy [13:03] doing [13:03] lets hope that doesnt bust the -stable ppa ;) [13:11] fta: i guess you can safely disable nmt for "jaunty" [13:11] we will never be able to backport all the bits needed [14:00] asac, done [14:00] zthx [14:00] what about ff3.5? [14:02] disable it for now too [14:02] also how about killing intrepid everywhere ;)? [14:03] lets keep it running till eol [14:19] done [14:19] i hate people redenting with the same groups [14:19] the server should drop the groups [14:39] true [14:39] thought it did [14:40] at least the redent button should [14:51] i386 3 555 jobs (26 hours) [14:51] ok out for lunch etc. [14:56] asac: hi, just wondering if u've tried it urself [14:59] Hi, how can i install mozilla SDK on ubuntu? [14:59] Ruyan: not sure what that is ... xulrunner-1.9.1-dev contains the xulrunner sdk [14:59] mbana: tried what? [15:00] lunch [15:01] i need run up xpcom [15:23] damn, i can't login on openrunner.com with chromium [15:25] XHR error [15:25] damn site [15:29] Ruyan: i think our xul -dev packages are what you are looking for [15:35] micahg: what's the prob? [15:35] (tb3 merge) [15:35] asac: I tried a bzr mv on tb3 before merge and they still conflict because of no common ancestor [15:42] before merge? [15:42] bzr merge -r 0.. ... worked for me [15:42] had conflicts, but those were resolvable [15:43] asac: I did bzr mv on the tb3 files so they have the same name, then bzr merge -r0..-1 and I get a debian and a debian.moved dir [15:43] debian.moved is the old tb2? [15:43] thats ok i guess [15:43] asac: yes, but the diff is the entire debian dir :( [15:44] so its tricky next steps are: [15:44] bzr mv debian.moved/changelog changelog [15:44] edit and add the tb3 changelog on top [15:45] let me see if i can do the first few steps [15:45] * micahg was also wondering why ff changelog is in TB... [15:45] because the tb package orginated from the ff package ;) [15:45] iirc [15:45] should it stay there? [15:46] have to look ... one sec [15:48] ok pushed current .head to bzr push lp:~mozillateam/thunderbird/thundebird.head.tb3-take1 [15:48] now uncommitting the stuff to last 2.0 release [15:50] if that doesnt work we can just use that i think and continue [15:50] well, I have the new files, I can copy the stuff in with meld... [15:52] meld? [15:53] merge tool [15:55] ok this works: [15:55] (not great, but better than not merging at all) [15:55] bzr rm debian [15:56] bzr commit --local -m "* delete all packaging files to prepare tb3 merge" [15:56] bzr merge -r0.. ../thunderbird-3.0.head [15:56] let me commit those two steps [15:57] that basically has the same problem I have [15:58] delete old add new [15:59] no [15:59] its different [15:59] you didnt do merge -r0.. [15:59] so now we have the same you initially did, but the branch has the full tbird 3 commit history [15:59] so now you can use bzr mv etc. [15:59] to replay what you did before [15:59] committed the delete and then merge [15:59] rev 115 [16:00] the tb3-take1 branch still has all from what you had [16:00] not perfect, but bets we can do i guess [16:00] the tbird branch should never have been started from scratch to begin with ;) [16:01] micahg: so you think you can go on now with bzr mv etc.? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:01] asac: now I can probaby merge in my local tb3.head :) [16:01] err that sounds like it would be bad [16:01] but try [16:02] * micahg will try to have this done by 19:00 UTC [16:02] i am quite sure you have to to replay [16:02] asac: I redid my local TB3 [16:02] ah [16:02] ok [16:02] why not try it right now ;)? [16:02] while i am still here [16:02] will be on the road a bit later ;) [16:04] 17:03 < asac> thunderbird.dev$ bzr log --include-merges | pastebinit [16:04] 17:03 < asac> http://paste.ubuntu.com/362021/ [16:04] 17:03 < asac> there is the whole history ;) [16:04] posted to wrong channel :-P [16:13] ok, my bzr mv changes worked now, but we need some of the packaging stuff from TB2 :( [16:13] should I just copy those back in [16:15] asac: ^^ [17:08] hello [17:08] who's using KDE [17:56] micahg: what packaging stuff? [17:56] asac_: some of the files that weren't in the 3.0 branch [17:57] should be ok to add them again [17:57] k, I'll meld the changes in [17:57] asac_: what happened to ff36? [17:57] in firefox-stable [17:57] but stuck in NEW :/ [17:58] * micahg missed that somehow [17:58] https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable/+packages [17:58] https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/lucid/+queue [17:59] ah, ok, do you need an archive admin to allow? [17:59] since it's a new source? [17:59] micahg: aye [18:00] yes ... i thought it wasnt new because that source was still in hardy etc. but seems i was wrong ;) [18:00] asac_: what does mfs stand for? [18:00] moz ffox stable === asac_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | firefox 3.6 in ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable [18:03] asac_: haha, you are way to serious. What speaks against leaving mfs out? Most people will ignore/don't understand it anyways [18:05] no its good to have it [18:06] asac_: speaking of ff, any progress regarding TB? [18:06] sebner: testing build now :) [18:07] micahg: ah I forgot, you are in charge of it :D [18:07] sebner: I'm attempting it :) [18:07] heh [18:07] micahg: testbuilding means upload to Ubuntu if everything is going fine?! [18:08] sebner: probably, but I think I'll need to tweak a few things ;) [18:08] micahg: nothing against you but you are tweaking since the 3.0 release 2 months ago :P FF3.6 just got released some days ago and it's ready :P [18:09] sebner: I wasn't working on it straight for 2 months... [18:09] ^^ [18:09] I was missing some bzr fundamentals on my first try [18:10] nvm nvm, it's was more of a joke anyways [18:10] sebner: asac's been working behind the scenes on the ff 3.6 migration since UDS I think [18:10] me? [18:10] no [18:10] no [18:10] ? [18:10] hi there, i've just added the daily repo to my sources and updated on the will of having 3.6 but when installed firefox-3.6 and firefox-3.6-gnome-support nothing changed. Any clue of what might be wrong? [18:10] julio: install firefox [18:11] i was working on firefox-support-model in that i planned etc. but hands on work i didnt really do [18:11] i already have it... 3.5.7 [18:11] firefox-3.6 is no longer..it' [18:11] s migrated to firefox in the daily ppa [18:11] should i remove it prior to install? [18:11] i did firefox-3.5 all-static sometimes after UDS ... proof of concept thing ... like two times a few hours [18:11] no, it should upgrade [18:12] also someone told me that it could appear as namoroka or comething line on the internet menu but is not there either [18:12] any clue? [18:13] julio: dpkg -l firefox\* [18:13] paste.ubuntu.com [18:14] asac_: /bin/sh: debian/thunderbird.postinst: not found [18:14] julio: you need to run apt-get dist-upgrade [18:14] I have the .in file [18:15] micahg: the .in file is transformed in debian/rules [18:16] asac_, http://paste.ubuntu.com/362096/ [18:16] you need to drop the version there [18:16] julio: the daily takes over 3.5.7 ... you just have to upgrade your system after adding the ppa [18:16] installing firefox-3.6 etc. wasnt really necessary [18:17] julio: you could also remove those two packages again and rather go for the stable ppa: ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable [18:17] which isnt daily ;) [18:17] and has 3.6 [18:18] asac_: fixed, I goofed the .rules file when I added some stuff :9 [18:18] k [18:18] well... dist-upgrade or or the last thing? [18:18] depends on whether you want to use dailies for your main browser in future [18:18] if not go the stable route [18:19] so if i want to use the stable one i can safely remove daily from my sources? [18:19] yes [18:19] add the stable ppa in /topic instead [18:21] how can i add the ppa on the command line? mean, editing on vim... the "deb something lines" [18:21] julio: karmic? === asac_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | to get firefox 3.6 run add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable and use update-manager to update your system [18:21] yup === asac_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | to get firefox 3.6 run: sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable and use update-manager to update your system [18:22] julio: ^^ [18:22] asac_: add sudo there [18:22] asac_: nm [18:22] but you need to remove daily explicitly ;) [18:22] but thats clear i guess [18:22] * micahg need to fix the pins :) [18:22] so sudo ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable right? [18:23] sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable === asac_ changed the topic of #ubuntu-mozillateam to: Welcome to the Ubuntu Mozilla Team: | Mailing List: ubuntu-mozillateam@lists.ubuntu.com | to get firefox 3.6 run: "sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable" - then use update-manager to update your system [18:23] i've asked for the deb lines as i feel more comfortable having all the ppas grouped :p [18:24] julio: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable [18:24] will this add it at the end of the file? [18:24] no [18:24] julio: it creates its own file in sources.list.d [18:24] it will add a new file in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ [18:24] ack [18:24] best way to do it in general [18:25] advantages? [18:25] i am not here to convince anyone [18:26] julio: imports key for you [18:26] ic [18:26] asac_: seems to be buiilding :) [18:27] it starts building. then wait till it fails [18:27] and fix stuff [18:27] probably need to be really lucky to not fail ... [18:27] have you dropped the patch that appends version etc? [18:27] that needs to be dropped now [18:27] asac_: I modified the profile patch to not add version [18:28] thunderbird-3-profile.patch [18:28] good [18:28] I kept the substitution of %APP_NAME% for thunderbird [18:28] like we did for firefox [18:28] ok [18:29] although, it probably can be dropped too if it's unversioned I guess [18:29] we keep it in firefox because of the abrowser thing. i dont think thats needed here directly anymore ... but well [18:29] ;) [18:29] yes [18:29] the complete patch can go [18:29] k, next spin ;) [18:29] we would need it for a thunderbird-dev package etc. [18:29] err [18:29] thunderbird-daily [18:29] thunderbird-beta [18:29] etc. [18:29] -dev would be confusing ;) [18:29] anyway. have to pack things and then travel. fell asleep when i targetted to travel [18:30] will check later whats going on [18:30] I think I found the stuff for the -dev package... [18:30] guess a bit more than 2.5h from now [18:30] micahg: lets do the -dev package after the upload ;) [18:30] 0ubuntu2? [18:31] well. lets first get there ;) [18:31] off for now [18:34] ok. added the stable repo, should i install it manully now or a apt-get upgrade will do it? [18:34] it offers only 3.5 [18:34] apt-get dist-upgrade [18:38] on it, in the mean time... is there a way of checking for duplicated ppas? every time i do an upgrade it checks for like 120 places... :p [18:38] you could go clean up what you have in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ [18:40] well, 3.6 at last :D thanks for that, where sould i go to install spanish lang pack? [18:40] julio: no langpacks yet [18:41] unless you want to install the upstream one, but you have to remember to remove it later [18:41] upstream? [18:41] from mozilla [18:42] what is that? [18:42] mozilla is the maker of firefox [18:43] sorry, question was for upstream :p [18:43] what does it mean? [18:43] oh, upstream is mozilla [18:43] you install an .xpi from them [18:43] vs installing an ubuntu language pack [18:43] we don't have the language packs yet, they'll come later in the lucid cycle [18:44] i've done that for my 3.5 when intalled [18:44] thought it was normal [18:44] no, they normally come in the ubuntu language pack for releases [18:45] where can i get the xpi? [18:46] * micahg is looking [18:52] * micahg is at a loss... [18:52] gavin: where can we find the upstream language packs? [18:52] lol, san google? [18:56] for what version? [18:56] gavin: 3.6 [18:57] http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-1.9.2-l10n/ [18:58] :D the big G got me there a few secs ago [18:58] julio: ^^ [18:58] thanks [18:58] * micahg must be rusty on google fu [19:00] fu? [19:00] julio: slang term... [19:00] is the same as in script fu on gimp? [19:00] i don't know what it means [19:01] julio: probable ;) http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=google+fu [19:01] well found an es-ar langpack but it says 3.6pre [19:01] is that the one i'm looking for? [19:02] julio: it should be 3.6.1pre [19:03] i skipped it as ff said 3.6, thought it was for a beta or so [19:04] asac_: we need to profile patch for profile migration :) [19:32] micahg, well got it in spanish, thanks [20:45] boas [20:45] tenho problemas com flash [20:45] english Varnion [20:46] ah [20:46] tao esuqce xD [20:46] lol [20:46] fta: where should flash 64bits .so be placed for Chromium to work ? [20:50] usual plugin dirs [20:51] fta: and where is that? [20:51] I only know .mozilla/plugins [20:52] * micahg sees a lot of symlinks in flashplugin-installer [20:53] yeah [20:53] and wrapper is broken again in 64 bits [20:53] just trying to help this user [21:52] micahg: profile patch for profile migration? [21:52] sounds wrong. we need to modify the startscript to properly migration [21:52] and need to copy the profile migration dialog [21:52] asac_: yeah from .mozilla-thunderbird to .thunderbird [21:53] we need to migration from .mozilla-thunderbird/... to .thunderbird by default [21:53] if user also has .thunderbird-3.0 we need to ask which one should be used [21:53] like we do for firefox [21:53] the profile migrator [21:53] its debian/migrator/main.c [21:53] in firefox-3.6.head [21:53] and its compiled in debian/rules [21:53] check that ... and put that into tbird too [21:54] of course adjust the text in the dialog ;) [21:54] asac_: k, I had to pull a new source tarball, I was ahving trouble with 3.0 [21:54] ok. not sure why, but ok [21:54] sounds like you had some other issues ;) [21:54] but if you have a good one now its fine [21:55] I'm pulling 3.0.1 [21:55] nah [21:55] please pull 3.0 [21:55] thats what we started to do [21:55] we should finish that and then go for 3.0.1 after thats done [21:55] anyway. remember to push what you have EOD [21:55] i will continue it in case its not finished [21:55] asac_: I'm doing 3.0.1 now [21:56] does 3.0 work already? [21:56] please dont [21:56] I think the version file was messed up [21:56] fix 3.0 [21:57] k, I'll pull a new 3.0 then [21:57] you still have the tarball from last time [21:57] somehow, I got 3.0.2 in my 3.0pre [21:57] keep using it [21:57] er, 3.0 [21:57] the tarball isnt really important [21:57] k [21:57] any tarball created by dailies should be fine [21:57] just dont bump the changelog to something ahead of 3.0 [21:57] I was getting an error with regards to libdir [21:58] new tarball is never an answer to such issues [21:59] k [21:59] just wastes time ;) [22:02] * micahg found it... [22:02]