[12:32]  * henninge can't stand the quiet .... ;)
[14:05] <gary_poster> hey gmb.  For the release-critical request for https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gmb/launchpad/remove-bug-heat-from-garbo-daily-bug-511283/+merge/17912 , I'm trying for the guideline of "if it would have been a CP, it can be a release-critical".  The problem you say it addresses does sound like it would be a CP candidate under non-release circumstances, but could you verify before I pursue further?
[14:21] <sinzui> gary_poster: I have a bug that I just tagged as a release blocker. Maybe I was wrong: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-registry/+bug/512182
[14:21] <mup> Bug #512182: Karma and bug activity missing when bugs are updated by creating a release <current-rollout-blocker> <Launchpad Registry:In Progress by sinzui> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/512182>
[14:22] <gary_poster> looking
[14:25] <gary_poster> sinzui: my evaluation is that it is CP candidate, and therefore I will approve it for RC if it is available, but it doesn't sound like a release blocker to me because the two symptoms are not critical (that is, I value an on-time release higher than those two symptoms).  Are you OK with that evaluation, or would you like to talk about it more?
[14:25] <sinzui> gary_poster: yes
[14:25] <gary_poster> sinzui: cool thanks
[14:47] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs: can you review my branch at https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sinzui/launchpad/release-bugtask-bug-512182/+merge/17989
[14:47] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: sure
[14:48] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: is it really 13,000 lines, or should it be merged into db-devel instead of devel?
[14:48] <sinzui> oh bugger
[14:49] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs: I will remake the merge request to db-devel, The diff is less that 100 lines
[14:49] <EdwinGrubbs> ok, cool
[14:54] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sinzui/launchpad/release-bugtask-bug-512182/+merge/17999
[15:14] <intellectronica> abentley: can i ask you to review a small branch of mine, an r-c candidate to fix those timeouts in bug listings?
[15:14] <abentley> intellectronica: okay
[15:14] <intellectronica> abentley: thanks. https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~intellectronica/launchpad/patch-badge-performance/+merge/18000
[15:18] <abentley> intellectronica: BugTaskImageDisplayAPI already exposed has_patch?
[15:18] <intellectronica> abentley: yes. i've added it in a previous branch, but didn't realise it's not being used because it's not included in the decorator
[15:19] <abentley> intellectronica: What decorator do you mean?
[15:19] <intellectronica> i mean BugTaskListingItem
[15:30] <abentley> intellectronica: I thought BugTaskImageDisplayAPI was an Interface because of its name and comment string.  Now I understand that BugTaskListingItemImageDisplayAPI is a subclass of it.
[15:35] <abentley> intellectronica: I don't see any call site updates to match the new BugTaskListingItem.__init__.  Where is it constructed?
[15:36] <abentley> intellectronica: never mind.
[15:36] <intellectronica> abentley: found it? they're passed as a dict to BugListingBatchNavigator which is why you missed them
[15:38] <abentley> intellectronica: Okay, approved.
[15:38] <intellectronica> abentley: thanks!
[15:42] <intellectronica> abentley: can i ask for an extra line for review? the same needed to be added in milestone views, since they also use BugTaskListingItem. see http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/362666/
[15:43] <abentley> intellectronica: r=me
[15:43] <intellectronica> cheers
[17:33] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs: Do you have time for that review? Should I seek someone else?
[17:34] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: I think this error is unrelated to your branch, but it is making it difficult for me to test things. When I run "make", I get ImportError: No module named builder.recipe
[17:35] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: do you get that error?
[17:39] <sinzui> I have not gotten that error.
[17:40] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: I think rocketfuel-get will solve it. I've gotten so used to running "bzr up download-cache" that I hardly ever run it.
[17:41] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs:  I certainly would have noticed that error. I had trouble with the code...the test was right, but I forgot to use notify so I ran my test many times without issue to understand my incompetence.
[17:41] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: make works now. Running the tests.
[17:48] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: it looks like Bug.setStatus() calls BugTask.transitionToStatus() and sends an event. you could use that with bug.setStatus(bugtask.target, status, user)
[17:49] <sinzui> bugtask.editView uses the approach I took
[17:51] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: ok, r=me
[17:52] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs: how would you test the use of bugtask.bug.setStatus(self.series_target, BugTaskStatus.FIXCOMMITTED, user)
[17:52] <sinzui> Can I keep the same test and just update the code?
[17:53] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: I think so.
[17:53] <sinzui> let me try, The method you found has conjoined rules that I never ever want to write again
[17:56] <sinzui> Oh, I cannot
[17:56] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs: I need 5 more minutes, the target is not as obvious as I thought because of source packages
[18:00] <sinzui> EdwinGrubbs: Thanks. I got rid of a lot of cruft: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/362757/
[18:01] <sinzui> The test was fine
[18:02] <EdwinGrubbs> sinzui: that looks good to go.
[18:02] <sinzui> thanks you very much. bug.setStatus works as I thought transitionToStatus() worked.
[18:08] <sinzui> Hi Gary. I am officially asking for an RC for this branch that we discussed a few hours ago: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sinzui/launchpad/release-bugtask-bug-512182/+merge/17999
[18:09] <gary_poster_> ack, sincui, approving.
[18:09] <gary_poster_> sinzui: 
[18:09] <sinzui> gary_poster: ^ If we landed it, you can create a release and all the foundations bugs will be updated for you for free!
[18:09] <gary_poster_> heh, cool
[18:12] <gary_poster_> sinzui, the web interface is pretty slow, but I approved
[18:50] <sinzui> beuno: Do you have time to do a follow up review of https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~sinzui/launchpad/needs-packaging-bug-509848/+merge/17848
[18:50] <beuno> sinzui, yes
[19:13] <bac> hi beuno
[19:14] <beuno> hi bac 
[19:15] <bac> beuno: on friday you noted some padding issues on the radio buttons as shown on http://people.canonical.com/~bac/linkup-multiple.png
[19:15] <beuno> yes
[19:15] <bac> beuno: i'm just using a vertical LaunchpadRadioWidget...so i don't see how the padding on it could be different than elsewhere
[19:16] <beuno> those lines are all squished
[19:16] <bac> beuno: but it does look cramped
[19:16] <beuno> off the top of my head, I can't think fo why that is
[19:16] <bac> i don't know fo why either
[19:17] <beuno> bac, are they in li's?  divs?
[19:17] <beuno> or just br's?
[19:18] <bac> beuno: the widget does the rendering based on the vocab.  i haven't looked at the implementation of it to see how it is done.
[19:52] <beuno> sinzui, doing your review
[19:52] <beuno> I think it's mostly ok
[20:02] <leonardr> gary: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~leonardr/lazr.restful/generate-multiversion-operations/+merge/18032
[20:03] <beuno> sinzui, done
[20:04] <sinzui> thank beuno
[20:06] <sinzui> beuno: I can make the link changes. This changes will appears on all pages and in the page title
[20:07] <sinzui> s/this/those/
[20:07] <beuno> sinzui, I think that's fine
[20:07] <sinzui> I hope so, I only want one set of terms referring to these pages
[20:08] <sinzui> beuno: That hardest part about developing a portlet to show the status of information that communities need to work with the porject is that we do not have a name for it
[20:09] <beuno> sinzui, yaeh, it's more about "tell us how the community works"
[20:10] <sinzui> The information we show on the source package should be presented the same way on the project page: https://dev.launchpad.net/Registry/UbuntuLinkUpstream?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=linked-package.png
[20:11] <sinzui> I have been looking for a term that uses contributor or community for project version of this portlet.
[20:11] <sinzui> Contributor Connections is the best term I have, and I do not like it
[20:12] <beuno> hm
[20:12] <beuno> it's a tricky one
[20:14] <sinzui> oh, this information cooresponds to the Participation portlet, accept that it contains all the hosted and remote services
[20:14] <beuno> I'll think about it while I write a long email
[20:14] <sinzui> thanks
[20:49] <bac> beuno: have a look at http://people.canonical.com/~bac/linkup-multiple-ff.png when you have a sec
[20:51] <beuno> bac, much better
[20:51] <beuno> but the "Upstream project" label is too far from the question  :)
[20:51] <bac> beuno: i didn't do anything.  :)  FF vs. webkit
[20:52] <beuno> you could, of course, drop that label
[20:52] <beuno> it's meaningless to most people I think
[20:57] <bac> beuno: that label is the 'title' for the widget.  i tried omitting it and just got a free-standing colon.
[20:57] <beuno> garrrrrrrr
[20:58] <leonardr> gary: if you want to warm up before reviewing my huge branch, here's an extremely short one:
[20:58] <leonardr> https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~leonardr/lazr.restful/missing-field-error/+merge/18037
[20:58] <beuno> bac, can the label be the question?
[20:58] <gary_poster> :-) ok
[20:58] <bac> beuno: if we want the question to end with ":"
[20:58] <beuno> double garrrrrrrrrrrrrr
[20:59] <bac> beuno: so the spacing issue is webkit only.  i propose to ignore it for this branch and find/file a bug to address it in a later branch
[21:00] <beuno> bac, I'll stamp it if you target it   :)
[21:00] <bac> que?
[21:01]  * bac curses his internet connection today
[21:01] <beuno> bac, the bug for the webkit thingie
[21:02] <bac> beuno: ok.  i'm still confused by stamp and target.  target where?
[21:02] <bac> sorry if i'm being dense
[21:02] <beuno> bac, ah, sorry for confusing you
[21:02] <beuno> I'll approve the MP if you target the bug to be fixed in the next cycle
[21:03] <beuno> these are the kind of bugs that almost never get fixed  :)
[21:03] <bac> beuno: sure i'll do that
[21:04] <bac> beuno: but, of course, i'll mark it as foundations...
[21:04] <beuno> ha
[21:04] <beuno> well played
[21:04] <gary_poster> :-P
[21:53] <gary_poster> leonardr: since you already looked at an earlier version of the file, could you review https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~gary/launchpad/bug_475371/+merge/18039 ?  I think this should just be comparing it to Tom's description in that bug report, as you already did, so I'm hopeful that this would be easy.
[21:53] <leonardr> gary, sure
[21:53] <gary_poster> thank you
[21:55] <bac> sinzui: my MP is up if you're interested:  https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~bac/launchpad/bug-490518-link-suggestion/+merge/18040
[21:56] <sinzui> bac: Thanks, I'll start it shortly