| asac | micahg: all good? | 00:17 |
|---|---|---|
| micahg | asac: it didn't run since I had uncommited changes..running now | 01:08 |
| asac | running? | 01:25 |
| asac | uncommitted changes usually work with bzr bd ... just not bzr rm i think | 01:31 |
| micahg | asac: not if files are missing :) | 01:34 |
| micahg | I removed 2 of the files from TB2 pkg dir | 01:35 |
| micahg | the tb-dom-inspector | 01:35 |
| asac | 02:31 < asac> uncommitted changes usually work with bzr bd ... just not bzr rm i think | 01:35 |
| asac | tb2 pkg dir? | 01:35 |
| asac | how did that come in the branch again | 01:35 |
| micahg | my fault | 01:36 |
| asac | k | 01:36 |
| asac | so ... in any case, please push your stuff up to some private branch before you go off | 01:37 |
| * micahg didn't know what was useless before | 01:37 | |
| micahg | k | 01:37 |
| asac | otherwise i probabl ywould end up redoing anything | 01:37 |
| asac | i wouldnt have added anything | 01:37 |
| asac | until the package rename works | 01:37 |
| asac | thats too much at once | 01:37 |
| asac | firs step: make package work | 01:37 |
| asac | second: improve | 01:37 |
| asac | but ok | 01:38 |
| * micahg knows for next time | 01:38 | |
| * micahg thought making =TB2 was step 1 | 01:38 | |
| asac | thats why i said, you should copy your work when done to some other place and think about atomic steps you can split that up | 01:40 |
| asac | helops a lot when one does that | 01:41 |
| micahg | so, push to private branch | 01:41 |
| micahg | remerge small pieces into head? | 01:41 |
| asac | well. better remerge small pieces into another private branch and give me the url when ready | 01:42 |
| asac | i will pull that in if its good :) | 01:42 |
| micahg | heh, ok | 01:42 |
| asac | such refactorings definitly require peer review ;) | 01:43 |
| micahg | it's nice to have peer review ;) | 01:43 |
| micahg | laptop at 81C | 01:44 |
| asac | heh | 01:47 |
| asac | too much building | 01:47 |
| micahg | yeah | 01:48 |
| micahg | building + flash | 01:54 |
| asac | flash is hot ;) | 02:01 |
| asac | yes | 02:01 |
| micahg | ugh, my tarball is bad | 02:12 |
| micahg | I'll generate a new one from the tag | 02:13 |
| joelinux | hi micah | 02:14 |
| micahg | hi joelinux | 02:15 |
| joelinux | sorry for jumping, but are you talking about a thunderbird tarball | 02:15 |
| micahg | joelinux: yes | 02:16 |
| joelinux | you mentioned from a tag. Did you call with client.py to extract? | 02:16 |
| micahg | get-orig-source handles all that | 02:17 |
| micahg | once it's set up | 02:17 |
| joelinux | I was having a problem with that. I guess I had it set up wrong. | 02:17 |
| joelinux | micahg: I think the stuff I did on seamonkey can help out with TB | 02:27 |
| micahg | joelinux: TB's not broke, it's PEBKAC error | 02:28 |
| joelinux | what PEBKAC? | 02:28 |
| micahg | !PEBKAC | 02:28 |
| micahg | problem exists between keyboard and chair | 02:28 |
| joelinux | :-) | 02:29 |
| * micahg hopes this is the last build for TB3 | 02:48 | |
| joelinux | Are you working on the stable branch, 3.0.1 or a different one? | 02:49 |
| micahg | 3.0 | 02:49 |
| * micahg is slamming his HD today | 02:49 | |
| joelinux | I bet | 02:50 |
| micahg | xfs | 02:50 |
| micahg | not made for builds | 02:50 |
| joelinux | really. I usually go with ext3/4 | 02:50 |
| joelinux | are you pulling the orig source each time? | 02:51 |
| micahg | no | 02:51 |
| micahg | but it recreates the build env when you use a new tarball | 02:52 |
| joelinux | good, cause that really hurts the drive ( and bandwidth) | 02:52 |
| micahg | making builds hurts the drive too :( | 02:52 |
| micahg | unless they're scsi drives | 02:54 |
| micahg | asac: I pushed my branch up under myself | 03:35 |
| micahg | built fine from start to finish | 03:35 |
| micahg | asac: I'm not going to be able to merge the finished product into smaller commits before tomorrow night | 03:56 |
| micahg | asac: here's the branch I pushed if you want to work on it: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/thunderbird/thunderbird.head-TB3 | 03:58 |
| micahg | asac: also report a bug doesn't quite work right, so I'd say drop the patch if you push it tomorrow | 04:02 |
| tony__ | anyone know where exactly in firefox it calls to the OS (linux specifically) to use a certain widget? reason being my widgets are messed up in kde 4.4 using firefox portable | 06:10 |
| tony__ | the usual methods didn't work for portable firefox | 06:10 |
| ArneGoetje | asac, ccheney: about the firefox-3.6 transition: how to proceed with the translations in Launchpad? merge xulrunner into firefox? Is this update for all releases? | 08:40 |
| ArneGoetje | dpm: ^ | 08:40 |
| BUGabundo_remote | morning | 08:53 |
| akaihola | hm, zero bugs in the team's launchpad bug tracker -- should I report straight upstream? | 10:08 |
| asac_ | akaihola: you can report in ubuntu and upstrema ;) | 10:09 |
| asac_ | and then connect the bugs | 10:10 |
| asac_ | but in general yes, upstream is a better place to report firefox issues | 10:10 |
| akaihola | better than reverting to Lucid's firefox, verifying that the bug exists there and reporting on Launchpad? | 10:11 |
| akaihola | my issue *might* be a metacity problem instead | 10:12 |
| [reed] | wait, how in the world did I miss the entire "multisearch" fiasco? | 10:31 |
| asac_ | [reed]: seems you were disconnected ;) | 10:31 |
| [reed] | I guess so | 10:31 |
| asac_ | i was sure you were here when everybody ranted ;) | 10:31 |
| [reed] | huh | 10:32 |
| asac_ | but i think it was while you were off duty somewhat | 10:32 |
| asac_ | how did that come up just noe? | 10:32 |
| asac_ | now? | 10:32 |
| [reed] | I saw it mentioned somewhere | 10:33 |
| [reed] | it was mentioned in a comment on http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2010/01/video_freedom_a.html | 10:33 |
| asac_ | heh | 10:34 |
| asac_ | i think today we will announce multisearch II ;) | 10:35 |
| [reed] | oh? | 10:35 |
| [reed] | lol | 10:35 |
| [reed] | good luck with that! | 10:36 |
| * vish hands asac_ a shield ... [for the rotten eggs he might receive ] ;) | 10:39 | |
| BUGabundo_remote | vish: ahaha | 10:40 |
| vish | BUGabundo_remote: heh , it was pretty funny , how the multisearch bug report became an asac_ hate-report ;) | 10:41 |
| gavin | multisearch fiasco? | 10:44 |
| BUGabundo_remote | vish: even asac blog.... man ppl are BAD | 10:45 |
| BUGabundo_remote | then again, I was among those, that didnt like my _regular_ searchs being intercepted, and removed the addon | 10:45 |
| BUGabundo_remote | mozilla 242852 | 11:34 |
| ubottu | Mozilla bug 242852 in Menus "I wish that "Copy link text" were a hyperlink contextual menu option" [Enhancement,Resolved: fixed] http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242852 | 11:34 |
| BUGabundo_remote | :p | 11:34 |
| dpm | hi all, could someone help me in telling me whether the | 13:24 |
| dpm | oops, typed enter too fast | 13:25 |
| dpm | again... | 13:25 |
| asac_ | hi | 13:25 |
| asac_ | ;) | 13:25 |
| dpm | could someone help me with bug 511837? I'm trying to tell if it's a translation issue | 13:25 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 511837 in language-pack-ast "Latest language pack in 'karmic-proposed' breaks Firefox in Asturian" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/511837 | 13:25 |
| dpm | :) | 13:25 |
| eagles0513875 | hey asac:) | 13:27 |
| asac_ | hi | 13:27 |
| asac_ | dpm: the langpack thing moved to a different machine | 13:27 |
| asac_ | talk to ArneGoetje | 13:27 |
| asac_ | dont know what the status is | 13:27 |
| asac_ | but it feels that langpacks could well be busted becaues of that migration | 13:27 |
| dpm | asac_ they seem to be ok for other languages, but that's a good point, ArneGoetje, do you think the 20090116 language pack PPA could have had the problem because of that? | 13:33 |
| asac_ | dpm: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-pack-ast there is no package in karmic-proposed | 13:54 |
| asac_ | e.g. i cant really look | 13:54 |
| asac_ | if you can get me a .deb to check i can take a look how bad it is | 13:54 |
| dpm | asac_ thanks for looking. yes, I asked pitti to remove it from -proposed. It was the same as this one -> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-langpack/+archive/ppa/+sourcepub/931940/+listing-archive-extra | 14:12 |
| asac_ | dpm: the other langpacks are good? | 14:14 |
| dpm | asac_ I haven't tested them all, but at least the Catalan langpack I'm running did not give me any problems | 14:15 |
| dpm | let me install a few... | 14:15 |
| asac_ | thats strange then | 14:16 |
| asac_ | please post your chrome.manifest files | 14:16 |
| asac_ | ... and you should definitly test all ... to prevent rollout | 14:16 |
| asac_ | of an eventual busted thing from -proposed | 14:17 |
| asac_ | unless pitti removed all now | 14:17 |
| asac_ | if you hvae the langpack-o-matic log from that run it would be great | 14:18 |
| asac_ | for now i would really think we should make a new run with the new infrastructure | 14:18 |
| dpm | asac_ yes, give me a sec and I'll post the chrome.manifest files... (we do call for testing and test them, that's why we first upload them to -proposed). ArneGoetje is running langpack-o-matic, so we'll have to wait until he comes back for the log | 14:19 |
| dpm | asac_ here are my chrome.manifest files (both are the same): http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/362625 let me see if I can install the broken asturian langpack and post their chrome.manifest files | 14:29 |
| asac_ | both are the same? hmm. | 14:33 |
| asac_ | that feels wrong to begin with | 14:33 |
| asac_ | there is something fishy ... maybe arne manually uploadde a en-US.xpi | 14:33 |
| asac_ | and thought they were the same | 14:33 |
| asac_ | chrome.manifest is in /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/... | 14:34 |
| asac_ | anyway ... i have to go and try to fix my email/irc gateway | 14:34 |
| dpm | I'm not sure, but these are not giving me any (apparent problems). Yes, it is there | 14:34 |
| dpm | /usr/lib/firefox-addons/extensions/langpack-ca@firefox-3.5.ubuntu.com/chrome.manifest | 14:35 |
| dpm | and | 14:35 |
| dpm | /usr/lib/xulrunner-addons/extensions/langpack-ca@xulrunner-1.9.1.ubuntu.com/chrome.manifest | 14:36 |
| ArneGoetje | asac_: I think you are right, might have been my fault... | 14:38 |
| dpm | ArneGoetje, asac_ the Asturian ones look a bit different: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/362638 | 14:41 |
| asac_ | good... have to run out for a few hours to fix my email/irc stuff | 14:41 |
| asac_ | bbthen | 14:41 |
| dpm | They've got xulrunner-1.9.1-ast.jar or firefox-3.5-ast.jar instead of just ast.jar | 14:43 |
| dpm | ArneGoetje, what do you think the problem might be, then? | 14:44 |
| ArneGoetje | dpm: like asac said, I uploaded a en-US.xpi and thought it was the same as the existing one... | 14:45 |
| eagles0513875 | asac: if you have about 100 or so tabs open in ff does it crash on u im trying to determine if its just a bug in windows version of ff or also occurs on ubuntu as well | 14:46 |
| ArneGoetje | eagles0513875: I recently had 146 tabs open in the 3.5 one on Karmic and it didn't crash. | 14:47 |
| eagles0513875 | strange | 14:48 |
| eagles0513875 | then its a windows bug | 14:48 |
| eagles0513875 | causes strange runtime errors on windows | 14:48 |
| micahg | eagles0513875: we've had some reports of the same on linux | 14:48 |
| micahg | it's most likely caused by something in one of those tabs | 14:48 |
| micahg | If/when oopp lands, it might help | 14:48 |
| eagles0513875 | ok im thinking flash cuz friend of mine was talking to them about it and they said something about flash being the cause | 14:48 |
| dpm | ArneGoetje, I'm just trying to understand it, so does this affect all languages? Or is it the cause of the -ast problem? | 14:49 |
| ArneGoetje | dpm: probably those which only have translations in launchpad and not upstream | 14:51 |
| dpm | ArneGoetje, ok, so what do you think we should do? Do you think the translations for those languages be fixed, new langpacks only for them be built and then uploaded to -proposed? | 14:52 |
| ArneGoetje | dpm: let me take a look first | 14:53 |
| dpm | ok, thanks ArneGoetje | 14:53 |
| ArneGoetje | dpm: yep, as I thought. I need to upload the proper en-US.xpi for firefox and xulrunner again... that should fix the problem. | 14:56 |
| dpm | ArneGoetje, ah, ok. Oncee the new en-US.xpi template has been uploaded, would it be possible to request a build of the packages affected (if I understand it correctly only those languages translating directly upstream and only the language-pack-ll packages) on the PPA, so that we could copy them to -proposed? | 15:01 |
| ArneGoetje | dpm: I have to see | 15:02 |
| dpm | ok, thanks! | 15:07 |
| gnomefreak | anyone able to give me an idea on what [flush-*] is in "ps aux" i have 18 of them | 15:08 |
| * gnomefreak thinks 18 is too many | 15:08 | |
| gnomefreak | here is the screenshot of the flush process http://img130.imageshack.us/i/psaux.png/ | 15:13 |
| * vish looks at firefox and weeps at the fonts :s | 15:34 | |
| vish | gnomefreak: what is the icon with the pond and ripple? | 15:35 |
| gnomefreak | ? | 15:36 |
| gnomefreak | what/where is icon? | 15:36 |
| vish | gnomefreak: rather what app* .. in between the thunderbird and sunbird[or whatever] | 15:36 |
| * gnomefreak still confused | 15:37 | |
| vish | gnomefreak: what icon is to the left of the thunderbird icon? on the panel | 15:37 |
| gnomefreak | on my panel is tbird-2 | 15:38 |
| gnomefreak | sunbird-thunderbird-2- tb3 | 15:38 |
| vish | gnomefreak: the one in the red box> http://imagebin.ca/view/mxrATKyu.html | 15:41 |
| vish | thats from the image you posted above | 15:41 |
| gnomefreak | vish: yep that is tb2 | 15:41 |
| gnomefreak | i did? | 15:42 |
| vish | huh... weird icon ;) | 15:42 |
| vish | <gnomefreak> here is the screenshot of the flush process http://img130.imageshack.us/i/psaux.png/ | 15:42 |
| * gnomefreak dont recall wher ei got it but i had a few (10) or so Mozilla icons | 15:42 | |
| vish | ;) | 15:42 |
| gnomefreak | vish: http://img130.imageshack.us/i/psaux.png/ | 15:43 |
| gnomefreak | look at top terminal | 15:43 |
| * gnomefreak filed bug | 15:43 | |
| * vish has one flush-8.0 but doesnt know what it is ;) | 15:46 | |
| gnomefreak | vish: its pdflush but that doesnt help me understnad it :) | 15:48 |
| vish | gnomefreak: in the sys monitor , waiting channel it says > bdi_writeback_task | 15:48 |
| vish | oh pdflush :D | 15:48 |
| * gnomefreak needs to find out what file to edit to prevent deamons from loading | 15:49 | |
| * vish fades back into the woodwork | 15:49 | |
| * gnomefreak goes for smoke while i try to figure this out | 15:51 | |
| gnomefreak | was firefox-3.6 ever fixed? if so what repo? | 16:28 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: yes, it's in lucid | 16:29 |
| micahg | as well as firefox-stable as per the channel note | 16:29 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: so i can install firefox-3.6 or is there another package? | 16:29 |
| micahg | hopefully the dailies still work | 16:29 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: im upgrading now but as of this morning it does not | 16:30 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: firefox-3.6 is now firefox | 16:30 |
| micahg | in dailies, lucid, and firefox-stable ppa | 16:31 |
| gnomefreak | ok | 16:31 |
| gnomefreak | thanks | 16:31 |
| gnomefreak | the stable PPA is the mozilla team PPA it seems | 16:32 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: yes, it belongs to the team | 16:33 |
| gnomefreak | yep | 16:33 |
| gnomefreak | ok thanks be back in a few | 16:34 |
| jcastro | sweet, the FF3.6 notify-osd stuff looks nice | 16:38 |
| gnomefreak | ok micahg the package "firefox" is reserved to firefox-2.0 is this going to be changed so firefox == 3.* | 16:41 |
| gnomefreak | for bug reports | 16:41 |
| gnomefreak | s/to/for | 16:42 |
| vish | gnomefreak: check out the flushes> http://people.canonical.com/~pitti/bootcharts/daniel-lucid-20100125-oldkernel.png | 16:46 |
| gnomefreak | vish: the flush amounts are expected? | 16:53 |
| gnomefreak | that is also an old kernel we are on 2.6.32-11 | 16:55 |
| vish | gnomefreak: i guess so.. that was from pitti's bootchart , they are cutting down boot time , so if it wasnt essential my guess is that they wouldnt be ther.. , he would know more.. | 16:55 |
| gnomefreak | ok thanks | 16:57 |
| vish | gnomefreak: heh , you scared me once into filing something similar ;p > Bug #409784 | 16:57 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 409784 in udev "102 instances of udev running !" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/409784 | 16:57 |
| gnomefreak | i remember that bug, dont recall it being invalid | 16:58 |
| gnomefreak | you filed it? | 16:59 |
| vish | yup | 16:59 |
| gnomefreak | were you using another name? | 16:59 |
| vish | ah , yeah , earlier i used > mac_v updated nick recently | 16:59 |
| gnomefreak | ah | 16:59 |
| * gnomefreak confused again. How is it ok to have 102 or ever 84 of the same process? | 17:02 | |
| vish | gnomefreak: iirc , keybuk mentioned that during boot since several processes are running/loaded rapidly , udev has several instances running , but over time the instances reduce , so if 1 have 102 during boot , it would be lesser over 6~12 hrs and keep reducing | 17:04 |
| vish | s/1/i | 17:05 |
| gnomefreak | oh | 17:05 |
| gnomefreak | !info firefox karmic | 17:11 |
| ubottu | firefox (source: firefox-3.5): meta package for the popular mozilla web browser. In component main, is optional. Version 3.5.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.10.1 (karmic), package size 71 kB, installed size 128 kB | 17:11 |
| gnomefreak | asac_: any objection of approving Joe for MT membership? | 17:24 |
| asac_ | gnomefreak: joe? | 17:28 |
| asac_ | do i know him? | 17:28 |
| asac_ | ;) | 17:28 |
| gnomefreak | yeah hold ona sec. Joe Lesko he is working on SM2 | 17:29 |
| gnomefreak | and looking to be a member as well as maintainer of SM2 but i need to really look at this package in its close to final state. micahg how is Sm2 going? Is there a chance to remove script and use debian/rules or is it close to being shipped? I havent looked at it since the most recent changes | 17:31 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: from what I've discussed with him, it's going to need a little work | 17:31 |
| micahg | I haven't actually looked at it yet | 17:31 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: BTW, you don't have to be a member to be a maintainer initially | 17:32 |
| gnomefreak | I'm more interested in the package following the same as all our other ones and nobinonly should be used | 17:32 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: i know | 17:32 |
| gnomefreak | membership allows you to use MT branches and PPA as i recall | 17:33 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: he hacked up mozclient, so that's at least one thing that'll need to be fixed | 17:33 |
| gnomefreak | asac_: https://edge.launchpad.net/~joe-nationnet | 17:33 |
| asac_ | let him first contribute | 17:34 |
| asac_ | we want new members to have actively contribute here before | 17:34 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: im not going to have alot of time this week but i will grab the branch friday/saterday and look at it to see what i think | 17:34 |
| asac_ | e.g. suggest merges | 17:34 |
| gnomefreak | asac_: you dont want the merge for SM2 atm it needs some more work | 17:35 |
| asac_ | right. so he needs to be here | 17:35 |
| asac_ | work with us on that | 17:35 |
| asac_ | and when its ready we merge it | 17:35 |
| asac_ | after a few times, he can become mt ;) | 17:35 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: mozclient hacks == target changes? | 17:35 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: tag changes | 17:36 |
| gnomefreak | yeah that | 17:36 |
| micahg | he made his own version of DEBIAN_TAG | 17:36 |
| schmichael | if i want to use firefox 3.6 and firebug 1.5 on ubuntu 9.10, is there a particular version/package of firefox i should use? | 17:36 |
| micahg | schmichael: see the channel title | 17:36 |
| schmichael | micahg: i swear i actually googled before asking. that counts for something right? | 17:36 |
| gnomefreak | IIRC 1.5 has a bunch of problems | 17:36 |
| schmichael | thanks | 17:37 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: fixed with ff36 | 17:37 |
| gnomefreak | with firefox-3.6 and up | 17:37 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: did we get 1.5 in repos yet? | 17:37 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: i don't think so | 17:37 |
| gnomefreak | we were on 1.4* | 17:37 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: jsut released | 17:37 |
| gnomefreak | k | 17:37 |
| micahg | schmichael: use upstream firebug | 17:37 |
| micahg | asac_: wrt TB3, do you want me to try again tonight...it needs work and I think I added too much | 17:38 |
| schmichael | micahg: always do, but thanks. installing ff3.6 now | 17:38 |
| asac_ | micahg: the .links file needs to go | 17:38 |
| micahg | asac_: yeah, I did that already | 17:38 |
| micahg | and I shouldn't have imported the cdbs folder either | 17:39 |
| * micahg has learned that just becuase it's there doesn't make it necessary :) | 17:39 | |
| micahg | gnomefreak: firebug 1.5 is in unstable in debian | 17:39 |
| schmichael | micahg: works beautifully, no more segfaults with fb1.5. thanks! | 17:40 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: k | 17:40 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: firebug 1.5 should be in lucid in about 2 weeks | 17:40 |
| gnomefreak | k | 17:41 |
| micahg | was uploaded to unstable yesterday | 17:41 |
| micahg | asac_: so, should I try again tonight? | 17:42 |
| === vish is now known as \vish | ||
| asac_ | micahg: i fixed the .links locally | 18:01 |
| asac_ | micahg: i will let you know | 18:01 |
| asac_ | have to check if its good afterwards | 18:01 |
| * asac_ drinks a hot tea before going on the road again | 18:02 | |
| gnomefreak | asac_: what are we doing with the package "firefox" in LP for bugs? | 18:07 |
| asac_ | we continue using it ;) | 18:07 |
| asac_ | haha | 18:07 |
| asac_ | back to roots | 18:07 |
| gnomefreak | asac_: for firefox-2? or will it be used for >=3.5 | 18:08 |
| asac_ | for 3.6 onwards | 18:08 |
| gnomefreak | k | 18:08 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: do you know if we added this fix to 3.6 | 18:11 |
| gnomefreak | http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/454c8ec86b1e | 18:11 |
| gnomefreak | that fix | 18:12 |
| gnomefreak | or are we only fixing it in 3.7 | 18:12 |
| [reed] | gnomefreak: that is 3.7 only | 18:22 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: I updated find the right package to say firefox for firefox 3.6+ | 18:27 |
| gnomefreak | thanks [reed] and micahg | 18:36 |
| gnomefreak | anyone else notice that (i think its the mozillateam PPA) is not working? | 18:37 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: can you define not working? | 18:38 |
| gnomefreak | its fta's and mozillateam | 18:38 |
| gnomefreak | W: Failed to fetch http://ppa.launchpad.net/mozillateam/ppa/ubuntu/dists/lucid/main/source/Sources.gz 404 Not Found | 18:38 |
| gnomefreak | sources and binaries | 18:38 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: that's not used AFAIK | 18:38 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: what isnt used? | 18:39 |
| micahg | that PPA | 18:39 |
| gnomefreak | that is the mozillateam PPA | 18:39 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: for what? | 18:39 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: if not what is the stable firefox PPA | 18:39 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: see channel title | 18:39 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: that is the one i had | 18:39 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable | 18:39 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: i used the command and it said i had it already | 18:39 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: k? | 18:39 |
| micahg | did you add the mozilla team ppa as well? | 18:40 |
| micahg | nothing in there for karmic or lucid | 18:40 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: already had it as i always had | 18:40 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: well, it's empty for karmic and lucid, so you might want to disable or you'll get errors | 18:41 |
| gnomefreak | gpg: key CE49EC21: "Launchpad PPA for Mozilla Team" not changed | 18:41 |
| gnomefreak | that is what i get using the command in topic | 18:41 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: so you already have it | 18:42 |
| micahg | but that's not the ppa you mentioned before | 18:42 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: i had mozillateam PPA not the one in topic that is what it told me though | 18:43 |
| micahg | mozillateam/ppa != mozillateam/firefox-stable | 18:43 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: that is not correct. they are not the same | 18:43 |
| gnomefreak | oh yeah sorry | 18:43 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: than it would be great to know why it said i had it and didnt add the firefox-stable one | 18:44 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: I think it's a bug | 18:44 |
| micahg | you already have the key so it might not add the repo | 18:44 |
| gnomefreak | we should add the PPA link to topic instead if it is a bug | 18:44 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: apt-cache policy | grep firefox-stable | 18:44 |
| gnomefreak | W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://ppa.launchpad.net lucid/main Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/ppa.launchpad.net_mozillateam_firefox-stable_ubuntu_dists_lucid_main_binary-i386_Packages) | 18:44 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: seems like you ran it twice | 18:45 |
| gnomefreak | nomefreak@Development:~$ policy |grep firefox-stable release v=10.04,o=LP-PPA-mozillateam-firefox-stable,a=lucid,n=lucid,l=Firefox Stable Channel Packages,c=main | 18:45 |
| micahg | yep, you got it | 18:45 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: its only in there one time | 18:45 |
| micahg | so you're good, what's the problem? | 18:45 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: http://paste.ubuntu.com/362786/ | 18:46 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: I should not get any error or warning from PPA | 18:46 |
| micahg | you have that and you added the repo with sudo add-apt-repo? | 18:47 |
| gnomefreak | no matter how hard i look there is only 1 in there for stable. Im going to guess its the name of the PPA apt doesnt understand | 18:47 |
| gnomefreak | micahg: i did the first time but it gave me same thing so i than added it by hand still same thing | 18:48 |
| micahg | gnomefreak: you probably have an additional entry in /etc/apt/sources.list.d | 18:48 |
| gnomefreak | giv eme a minute | 18:48 |
| gnomefreak | i might have fixed it but not sure yet | 18:50 |
| gnomefreak | nope still saying dup | 18:51 |
| gnomefreak | fixed | 18:53 |
| gnomefreak | 3.6.1~hg20100122r33535+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd3 is not fixed, when is planned fix for dailies? | 18:55 |
| * gnomefreak would love to avoid pinning it if possible | 18:56 | |
| * gnomefreak brb smoke | 18:56 | |
| fta | what is broken? | 18:57 |
| gnomefreak | fta: firefox in daily builds | 19:01 |
| gnomefreak | 3.6.1~hg20100122r33535+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd3 | 19:02 |
| fta | which part? | 19:02 |
| gnomefreak | fta: it wont launch | 19:02 |
| gnomefreak | it was fixed (so i hear) in firefox-stable PPA | 19:02 |
| fta | hm, broken here too, but it's apparmor | 19:04 |
| jdstrand | fta: what is broken, the 3.6 daily? in what way? | 19:04 |
| gnomefreak | fta: should we add the apparmor fix | 19:05 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: dailies wont launch | 19:05 |
| fta | jdstrand, http://paste.ubuntu.com/362794/ | 19:05 |
| mbana | asac: hi, i was saying have u managed to fix it | 19:05 |
| mbana | _you_ | 19:05 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: can you paste your dmesg? | 19:05 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: full output http://paste.ubuntu.com/362796/ | 19:06 |
| gnomefreak | its at the bottom | 19:06 |
| jdstrand | that is an old profile name | 19:07 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: can you paste the output of 'ls -l /etc/apparmor.d'? | 19:07 |
| gnomefreak | http://paste.ubuntu.com/362797/ is not the same as fta's | 19:07 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: http://paste.ubuntu.com/362799/ | 19:08 |
| gnomefreak | 3.7 works great | 19:09 |
| fta | mine is from yesterday, i'm upgrading right now | 19:09 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: can you give the output of 'dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6 ; dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox | 19:09 |
| jdstrand | ' | 19:09 |
| gnomefreak | nomefreak@Development:~$ 'dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6 ; dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox' | 19:10 |
| gnomefreak | bash: dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6 ; dpkg -S /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox: No such file or directory | 19:10 |
| jdstrand | the problem is that there are two apparmor conffiles that are competing for the binary-- the first is what should be used, the second is what is being used | 19:11 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: do that command without the single quotes | 19:12 |
| gnomefreak | irefox-3.6: /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6 | 19:13 |
| gnomefreak | firefox: /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox | 19:13 |
| * gnomefreak checks | 19:13 | |
| gnomefreak | there should be an f in there | 19:13 |
| jdstrand | hmmm | 19:13 |
| jdstrand | ok | 19:13 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: for now, just do 'sudo apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6' and 'sudo apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox' | 19:14 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: that will unload the problematic profile, but only until next reboot | 19:15 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: is this on lucid I presume? | 19:15 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: yes lucid | 19:15 |
| jdstrand | k | 19:16 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: doesnt help | 19:16 |
| gnomefreak | bash: sudo apparmor_parser -R etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6: No such file or directory same with "firefox" | 19:17 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: can you paste dmeg | 19:17 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: do that without the single quotes | 19:17 |
| jdstrand | (forget the dmesg) | 19:17 |
| gnomefreak | ok now it starts | 19:18 |
| jdstrand | ok | 19:18 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: you got what you need from me for this bug? | 19:19 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: yes | 19:19 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: ok thanks i can go do housework :) | 19:19 |
| jdstrand | gnomefreak: thanks for the info | 19:20 |
| gnomefreak | jdstrand: anytime | 19:20 |
| jdstrand | asac: we are going to want to do another upload of firefox on lucid | 19:21 |
| fta | still broken after the upgrade | 19:46 |
| jdstrand | fta: is your brokeness due to apparmor? | 19:54 |
| fta | yes | 19:54 |
| jdstrand | fta: can you paste your dmesg? | 19:54 |
| jdstrand | fta: and also 'sudo aa-status' | 19:55 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/362825/ | 19:55 |
| fta | http://paste.ubuntu.com/362826/ | 19:56 |
| jdstrand | fta: please give the output of 'ls /etc/apparmor.d' | 19:56 |
| fta | abstractions disable sbin.dhclient3 usr.bin.evince usr.bin.firefox-3.5 usr.bin.firefox-3.7 usr.sbin.mysqld | 20:00 |
| fta | cache force-complain tunables usr.bin.firefox usr.bin.firefox-3.6 usr.sbin.cupsd usr.sbin.tcpdump | 20:00 |
| fta | same bug i assume | 20:00 |
| jdstrand | fta: I think so. can you do the following: | 20:01 |
| fta | i can wait, i don't use it | 20:01 |
| fta | so i'll be able to test the fix | 20:01 |
| jdstrand | sudo apparmor_parser -R /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.6 ; sudo apparmor_parser -r usr.bin.firefox | 20:01 |
| jdstrand | fta: that will unload the old one and load the new | 20:02 |
| jdstrand | fta: it should work then | 20:02 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| asac | jdstrand: we need to fix ffox for hardy etc. | 20:29 |
| asac | seems we use apparmor commands that arent there yet | 20:29 |
| asac | or did you already fix that? | 20:29 |
| asac | (remember something with -W) | 20:29 |
| jdstrand | asac: we should not be enabling apparmor on < 9.10 | 20:29 |
| asac | yes | 20:30 |
| asac | but i want to keep the packaging identical if possible | 20:30 |
| jdstrand | asac: well, we should not even consider it in the packaging | 20:30 |
| asac | would that work? | 20:30 |
| asac | our dailies were always built from the .head branch for all ubuntu releases | 20:30 |
| asac | would like to get back to that | 20:31 |
| jdstrand | asac: http://paste.ubuntu.com/362853/ | 20:31 |
| jdstrand | asac: this should already be handled in the 3.6 packaging | 20:31 |
| jdstrand | asac: ^ | 20:31 |
| asac | hmm | 20:32 |
| asac | since when? | 20:32 |
| jdstrand | a while | 20:32 |
| asac | yesterday someone came here and had postinst issue | 20:32 |
| asac | with some apparmor.*-W | 20:32 |
| asac | call | 20:32 |
| asac | or was that saturday? not sure | 20:32 |
| asac | i will check the logs | 20:32 |
| jdstrand | that was saturday | 20:32 |
| jdstrand | this has been in there a long time before that | 20:33 |
| asac | [14:23] <White_Sloun> it seems that on ubuntu 9.04 you dont need to call apparmor_parser with -W -T | 20:33 |
| jdstrand | I think it was on jaunty | 20:33 |
| jdstrand | yeah | 20:33 |
| asac | can we do something about that? | 20:33 |
| jdstrand | I can remove the -W and -T | 20:33 |
| jdstrand | they aren't needed any more | 20:34 |
| asac | ok cool | 20:34 |
| asac | will that help for jaunty? | 20:34 |
| asac | or does it indicate there is something else broken that he ended up with that issue at all? | 20:34 |
| jdstrand | upgrades should disable the profile | 20:34 |
| jdstrand | (in preinst) | 20:34 |
| jdstrand | if he enabled the profile and then did a dpkg-reconfigure, it could trigger it | 20:35 |
| jdstrand | asac: I don't think we will have to immediately upload 3.6 ubuntu2 to lucid after thinking about it. it should only hit people who use dailies. they will have the fix after I finish testing my patch | 20:37 |
| asac | jdstrand: ŵhy does it hit dailies worse? | 20:37 |
| jdstrand | asac: I'm talking about a different issue | 20:38 |
| asac | right. even there i wonder why dalies suffer more | 20:38 |
| jdstrand | asac: the one gnomefreak and fta are hitting has to do with the renaming | 20:38 |
| asac | dailies are the same packaging afaik | 20:38 |
| asac | yes ... but the same package is also in lucid :) | 20:38 |
| jdstrand | asac: what is happening is that before the rename, we had /etc/apparmor.d/usr.bin.firefox-3.5 | 20:38 |
| jdstrand | err | 20:38 |
| jdstrand | firefox-3.6 | 20:38 |
| asac | yes | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | after the rename we have /etc/apparmor.d/ufw.bin.firefox | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | heh | 20:39 |
| asac | ah ... so conffile crazyness again ;) | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | s/ufw/usr/ | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | yes | 20:39 |
| asac | modified? | 20:39 |
| asac | ouch | 20:39 |
| asac | man | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | I didn't remove usr.bin.firefox-3.6 | 20:39 |
| fta | asac, the "... will check again next time." message is weird | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | no not modified | 20:39 |
| asac | i knew that apparmore needs ral defaults in /usr/share ;)( | 20:39 |
| asac | jdstrand: yes, but the -3.6 doesnt get removed autonmatically? | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | asac: no, it didn't | 20:39 |
| jdstrand | asac: and the -3.6 one had a liberal glob, so they didn't get the dirname fixes that went into usr.bin.firefox | 20:40 |
| asac | ah right | 20:40 |
| asac | ok | 20:40 |
| jdstrand | both profiles load, but the binary matches the -3.6 one | 20:40 |
| asac | i think i understand why only daily users suffer | 20:41 |
| jdstrand | so I am just going to remove the 3.6 one if it is unchanged for shipped. if it is changed, I am going to mv it to -3.6.dpkg-old, which apparmor will ignore | 20:41 |
| jdstrand | asac: right, a lucid user never had the -3.6 on disk | 20:41 |
| asac | shouldnt we also somehow ensure that the 3.5 apparmor file gets removed? | 20:41 |
| asac | otherwise it feels like clutter | 20:41 |
| asac | jdstrand: yes. if its modified, keep it renamed | 20:42 |
| asac | likt .conf-old | 20:42 |
| asac | like | 20:42 |
| jdstrand | asac: from a clutter PoV we could, but from an apparmor PoV there is no need | 20:42 |
| jdstrand | (for 3.5) | 20:42 |
| asac | jdstrand: yes. i would think just startup time | 20:42 |
| asac | parsing a not needed profile | 20:42 |
| jdstrand | in lucid the profile is cached-- the load is about as instantaneous as you can get (as fast as it can be read off disk just about) | 20:43 |
| jdstrand | (and karmic) | 20:43 |
| asac | jdstrand: yes, but remember that we will also push that package to karmic eventually | 20:43 |
| asac | ah | 20:43 |
| asac | you say its also cached in karmic? | 20:43 |
| asac | and jaunty doesnt have all this yes... ok | 20:44 |
| jdstrand | still, it would be nice to not have it if firefox-3.5 is no longer available | 20:44 |
| jdstrand | jaunty doesn't have a 3.5 profile, no | 20:44 |
| asac | but 3.0? ;) | 20:44 |
| asac | j.k. i think we never added it there | 20:44 |
| jdstrand | or 3.0 :) | 20:44 |
| jdstrand | right, just in karmic | 20:45 |
| * jdstrand knew you were kidding :) | 20:45 | |
| asac | hehe | 20:45 |
| asac | ok i think thats all good. so lets fix it on .head | 20:45 |
| asac | then dailies get fixed automatically | 20:45 |
| asac | and lucid gets properly fixed on next upload | 20:45 |
| asac | will probably happen not that far in future | 20:46 |
| jdstrand | asac: right | 20:46 |
| jdstrand | asac: so you'll pull .head into the lucid branch? | 20:46 |
| jdstrand | asac: (whenever you are ready) | 20:46 |
| === and`_ is now known as and` | ||
| asac | jdstrand: we dont have a lucid branch | 20:49 |
| asac | akak .head is the lucid branch | 20:49 |
| asac | jdstrand: you can just add a new changelog with UNRELEASED (if there isnt one) on top | 20:50 |
| asac | and there you go | 20:50 |
| asac | i think i already started next revision | 20:50 |
| jdstrand | asac: that is what I was planning-- you mentioning .head made me think there might be something somewhere else :) | 20:51 |
| jdstrand | asac: you did start the next revision | 20:51 |
| jdstrand | asac: I'm afraid to do anything with the firefox-3.5 profile atm. since it is common packaging and firefox-3.5 is still around in dailies and the archive | 20:53 |
| jdstrand | asac: we can do something with it when firefox-3.5 is gone unless you have another idea | 20:53 |
| micahg | asac: if firefox-3.5 even installable in the dailies anymore | 20:54 |
| micahg | jdstrand: archive branches are separate for firefox-3.5 | 20:54 |
| * jdstrand nods | 20:55 | |
| micahg | except for lucid, which should be removed from archive (I think) | 20:55 |
| jdstrand | if firefox-3.5 is gone from the dailies, then we should technically be ok | 20:56 |
| micahg | asac: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38314073/upload_1463388_log.txt | 20:58 |
| micahg | we either need to move ff35 to a firefox-old daily ppa or drop it | 20:58 |
| jdstrand | btw, firefox-3.6 in the dailies hasn't built since 20100117 afaict | 20:59 |
| jdstrand | (just looking at versions available via apt) | 20:59 |
| jdstrand | that was on karmic iirc | 20:59 |
| jdstrand | http://ppa.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mozilla-daily/ppa/ubuntu/pool/main/f/firefox-3.6/ | 21:00 |
| micahg | jdstrand: 3.6.1~hg20100122r33535+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd3~karmic | 21:00 |
| micahg | jdstrand: wrong source | 21:00 |
| micahg | firefox-3.6 is firefox now | 21:01 |
| jdstrand | ah, of course | 21:01 |
| jdstrand | micahg: thanks | 21:01 |
| === cyphermo1 is now known as cyphermox | ||
| azteech | anyone know if there is a ubuntu-branded version out for firefox 3.5/3.6, 64-bit 9.04? | 21:29 |
| azteech | now there is one out for 9.10 .. but am running 9.04 | 21:29 |
| micahg | azteech: Ubuntu branded? | 21:29 |
| azteech | yep .. | 21:30 |
| micahg | azteech: firefox 3.6 available in PPA per title of channel | 21:30 |
| micahg | azteech: we have Firefox and Abrowser | 21:30 |
| azteech | tried that - but all I get down is the 3.0 version ... | 21:30 |
| micahg | There is no "ubuntu" branding | 21:30 |
| micahg | 3.0? | 21:30 |
| azteech | yep ... | 21:31 |
| micahg | how | 21:31 |
| micahg | how are you installing? | 21:31 |
| azteech | and when I specifically tell it to download firefox-3.6 I get a pre-release version .. that is giving me fits with java sites ... | 21:31 |
| micahg | azteech: there is no more firefox-3.6 | 21:31 |
| micahg | it's firefox now | 21:32 |
| azteech | sudo apt-get install firefox | 21:32 |
| micahg | azteech: what does sudo apt-get dist-upgrade show? | 21:32 |
| ccheney | if he still sees a firefox-3.6 that is probably part of his problem, he must have some other ppa in his sources.list | 21:33 |
| azteech | Reading package lists... Done | 21:33 |
| azteech | Building dependency tree | 21:33 |
| azteech | Reading state information... Done | 21:33 |
| azteech | Calculating upgrade... Done | 21:33 |
| azteech | 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. | 21:33 |
| azteech | stevan@linuxmystique:~$ | 21:33 |
| micahg | azteech: apt-cache policy firefox | 21:34 |
| azteech | that is what I get with dist-upgrade | 21:34 |
| azteech | firefox: | 21:35 |
| azteech | Installed: 3.6.1~hg20100122r33535+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd3~jaunty | 21:35 |
| azteech | Candidate: 3.6.1~hg20100122r33535+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd3~jaunty | 21:35 |
| azteech | Version table: | 21:35 |
| azteech | *** 3.6.1~hg20100122r33535+nobinonly-0ubuntu2~umd3~jaunty 0 | 21:35 |
| azteech | 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net jaunty/main Packages | 21:35 |
| azteech | 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status | 21:35 |
| azteech | 3.0.17+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 0 | 21:35 |
| azteech | 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main Packages | 21:35 |
| micahg | azteech: try pastebin next time | 21:35 |
| azteech | 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-security/main Packages | 21:35 |
| azteech | 3.0.8+nobinonly-0ubuntu3 0 | 21:35 |
| azteech | 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages | 21:35 |
| azteech | when I look at the about info, for the version that downloaded it says it is a pre-release version ... | 21:35 |
| micahg | azteech: you don't have the firefox-stable ppa | 21:36 |
| azteech | okay .. | 21:36 |
| azteech | sorry .. | 21:36 |
| azteech | don't usually send that much, so forget about pastebin .. | 21:36 |
| azteech | okay, so then I need to load the firefox-stable ppa into sources? | 21:36 |
| micahg | azteech: yes | 21:37 |
| * micahg forgot the command in title won't work on jaunty | 21:37 | |
| micahg | azteech: https://edge.launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/firefox-stable | 21:37 |
| azteech | micahg - okay, thanks, will load that in and see if that helps then. tks again :) | 21:38 |
| micahg | azteech: come back if you need more help | 21:39 |
| azteech | I will, thanks again .. | 21:39 |
| ccheney | asac: ugh finally running into the problem i had expected of duplicate symbols in the source source c file :-\ i think i have to break the c file into the original files now | 21:50 |
| ccheney | s/source/same | 21:51 |
| BUGabundo | bRoas o/ | 21:56 |
| asac | ccheney: where is the current patch? | 22:02 |
| micahg | asac: branding for ff seems to be in universe in the lucid package | 22:03 |
| ccheney | asac: haven't regenerated it today yet | 22:19 |
| ccheney | asac: i'll stick it up on my chinstrap incoming in a minute | 22:19 |
| ccheney | asac: ok its there now | 22:21 |
| ccheney | apparently its not the first collision i have had its just the first that caused a miscompile | 22:23 |
| ccheney | well not really miscompile, it probably already had that issue, first to fail to compile entirely is more accurate | 22:25 |
| asac | k | 22:27 |
| * ccheney is glad he did a partial cleanup of the giant source file before, makes it much easier to split it up | 22:29 | |
| fta | asac, any news about the review? | 22:30 |
| azteech | micahg : what you pointed me to worked like a champ. However, still experiencing issues with Java. Which version of java works with the new 3.6? What I had loaded was 6.0.02; but when I look at extensions, I am still being told it is not compatible, and sites I know use java are experiencing display issues. | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | fta: Ch is snapping agin | 22:35 |
| BUGabundo | :( | 22:35 |
| micahg | azteech: java console? | 22:36 |
| azteech | yep .. | 22:36 |
| fta | BUGabundo, doing what? | 22:36 |
| azteech | and, suspecting jre as well | 22:36 |
| micahg | azteech: uninstall it, it stopped working in 3.5 iirc | 22:36 |
| BUGabundo | fta: opening pages | 22:36 |
| BUGabundo | I'm seeing it in karmic | 22:36 |
| * micahg forgot the workaround | 22:36 | |
| BUGabundo | not lucid | 22:36 |
| azteech | okay. what do I use in lieu of? | 22:36 |
| BUGabundo | strangely enough | 22:36 |
| BUGabundo | oh and firefox 3.7 in karmic lost its icon :( | 22:37 |
| fta | *sigh* | 22:38 |
| BUGabundo | I'm upgrading my laptop now | 22:39 |
| BUGabundo | lets see what happens | 22:39 |
| BUGabundo | will restart Ch and try to snap it | 22:39 |
| azteech | micahg: never mind - ff just advised it found an update - after it loaded the console update, it came back and said no longer works in 3.6 and that it would automatically be uninstalled at next reboot - | 22:40 |
| micahg | azteech: see if this has any answers: https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Java+plugin+with+Firefox | 22:40 |
| micahg | yep | 22:41 |
| azteech | thaks, reading it now. Appreciate the help. | 22:41 |
| azteech | s/thaks/thanks | 22:41 |
| azteech | anyone know if java version 6 update 10, or later is in the repositories? | 23:10 |
| micahg | azteech: for jaunty 16 is in updates | 23:11 |
| azteech | okay, thanks. | 23:11 |
| asac | ccheney: http://paste.ubuntu.com/362935/ | 23:42 |
| asac | is that the error you are expecting? | 23:43 |
| asac | or did i grab the wrong patch? | 23:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
