[00:44]  * sebner hopes asac is not working anymore :P
[00:45] <sebner> rickspencer3: thx for the talk, I'll catch you next week then :)
[00:49] <rickspencer3> byez
[00:50] <sebner> gn8 :)
[01:23] <[reed]> s/Yahoo!/Bing/
[01:23] <[reed]> however, Bing is a fine choice
[01:23] <[reed]> Bing is a good competitor to Google
[01:23] <pace_t_zulu> whoa
[01:23] <pace_t_zulu> bing... really?
[01:24] <[reed]> you do know that MSFT is buying Yahoo!'s search division, right?
[01:24] <[reed]> so, it's effectively bing -> yahoo -> ubuntu
[01:24] <[reed]> which is amusing
[01:25] <[reed]> makes fixing bug 1 even more interesting ;)
[07:27] <haba713> hi! have you considered to add mozilla lightning/sunbird to ubuntu-mozilla-daily ppa?
[07:38] <ripps> So I hear everybody is complaining about the yahoo switch in firefox, good thing I use chromium, and none of this concerns me
[09:10] <vish> rickspencer3: while you guys are considering partnering with yahoo! , you should ask them to remove the warning "Of OS not supported"  , users get if they are using Yahoo!Mail in Ubuntu ;)
[09:12] <vish> warning is rather > " The all-new Yahoo! Mail has not been tested with your operating system.
[09:12] <vish> You can choose to continue anyway, or simply go to Yahoo! Mail Classic."
[09:28] <BUGabundo_remote> morning
[10:03] <asac> so can i look at email?
[10:04] <asac> e.g. is it still reasonably calm=?
[10:14] <vish> asac: are you asking about the yahoo!mail ? or the mailing list discussion?
[10:14] <asac> both
[10:15] <vish> asac: ML , seems well behaved ;) however you might wanna look at this blog , > http://www.chuckfrain.net/blog/2010/01/26/forced-changes-in-my-browser/
[10:16] <vish> asac: yahoo!mail , works fine , i'v been using it for more than a year or ever since new yahoo came into use and havent had any problems
[10:17] <asac> that title looks trollish
[10:17] <vish> yeah , the title could have been better ;)
[10:17] <vish> but the suggestion in the blog isnt really too bad
[10:17] <asac> "forces changes in my browser" ;)
[10:17] <vish> might calm down the chicken littles ;)
[10:32] <asac> heh yeah
[10:33]  * asac  checks whether chromium biuld on all three archs
[10:33] <asac> great
[10:33] <asac> sitting in bin NEW for armel, i286 and amd64
[10:38] <asac> bug 511151
[10:41] <BUGabundo_remote> asac: didn't micah said sun did not update for the new stuff  in 3.6?
[10:41] <asac> fta2: does chromium look in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins ?
[10:41] <fta2> asac, it used to
[10:41] <asac> BUGabundo_remote: i dont know if they updated something ... what i know is that it should still work, but just is in the wrong location
[10:41] <fta2> so i'd say yes
[10:42] <asac> fta2: ok ;)
[10:45] <fta2> Conflicting tags:
[10:45] <fta2>     4.0.305.0~svn20100123r36929-0ubuntu1
[10:46] <fta2> asac, did you touch the tag yesterday? i moved it after the 3rd try
[10:46] <fta2> fta@cube:/data/bot/chromium-browser.head $ bzr tags
[10:46] <fta2> 4.0.305.0~svn20100123r36929-0ubuntu1 475
[10:46] <asac> fta2: i ran debcommit -r
[10:47] <asac> odd
[10:47] <asac> i knew i had a release before
[10:47] <asac> then checked with bzr tags
[10:47] <asac> and was amazed that i didnt see any
[10:47] <asac> so i was able to just tag the new upload without --delete first
[10:47] <asac> strange
[10:47] <asac> also bzr didnt complain
[10:48] <asac> e.g. so the tag probably was just on your side
[10:48] <fta2> i just committed a fix for the daily, lp was down
[10:49] <fta2> them, it started to complained about the tag for push & pull
[10:49] <fta2> maybe the tag needs to be updated manually on lp...
[10:49] <fta2> weird
[10:55] <asac> fta2: what about ffmpeg package ... you think you can try to get that in the archive?
[10:55] <asac> i assume you should split it to not contain the non-free bits
[10:56] <asac> but probably one needs to check if we can split to multiverse by just binary packages
[10:56] <asac> but i think it needs separate sources
[10:58] <fta2> can you ask someone if it's possible? i think it is
[10:58] <fta2> but well, i don't know
[10:58] <fta2> libavcodec52 is in main
[10:58] <fta2> libavformat52 too
[10:58] <fta2> libavutil-extra-49 is in multiverse
[11:01] <fta2> asac, ^^
[11:01] <fta2> but we now ship a sumo of those
[11:04] <asac> fta2: what does "a sumo of those" mean?
[11:52] <asac> fta2: so i would like to move to dev channel for the follow up uploads of chromium
[11:52] <asac> is the packaging merged already there?
[13:15] <fta2> asac, yes, i want to use a channel too. did you read my comments about that to jcastro yesterday?
[13:16] <asac> no
[13:16] <fta2> asac, the sumo lib is just a single .so containing all the objects that used to be in 3 different .so. we had to do that to avoid the LD_LIBRARY_PATH which was making the totem plugin crash
[13:16] <asac> right
[13:17] <asac> but nonfree sumo is still split from free?
[13:17] <fta2> no, it's a completely different .so
[13:17] <fta2> each codec deb provides a single sumo
[13:19] <asac> ok
[13:46] <asac> !info libevas-svn-05-engines-x lucid
[14:14] <rickspencer3> vish, I use Yahoo mail, and have been for like 10 years, never got "not supported"
[14:14] <rickspencer3> I wonder if it's because I don't use the the fancy dhtml interface
[14:15] <mconnor> yeah, it's the DHTML thing they browser sniff on
[14:15] <mconnor> and sniff badly, I might add
[14:20] <vish> rickspencer3: you use the old yahoo!classic or the new yahoo!mail ? , i sent the screenshot btw [taken today] ;)
[14:21] <rickspencer3> old school
[14:21] <rickspencer3> vish, I'm following up right now, actually
[14:21] <rickspencer3> sending an email to the folks who know the folks at Yahoo!
[14:21] <rickspencer3> I'll try to get it straightened out
[14:21] <rickspencer3> vish, I assume it actually works fine, right?
[14:23] <vish> rickspencer3: yeah , it works fine[without any problems I can remember] but just this annoying message.. was/is pretty embarrassing when telling others to migrate to Ubuntu
[14:23] <mconnor> rickspencer3: they have some weird weird UA sniffing, we get that on nightly builds
[14:23] <rickspencer3> ok
[14:23] <rickspencer3> thanks vish
[14:23] <rickspencer3> thanks mconnor
[14:23] <vish> rickspencer3: thanks for looking into it :)
[14:23] <mconnor> rickspencer3: how's the wave of hatred hitting you today? ;)
[14:23] <rickspencer3> mconnor, quiet ...
[14:24] <rickspencer3> too quiet
[14:24] <rickspencer3> ;)
[14:24] <mconnor> oh, that's even worse, yeah'
[14:24] <rickspencer3> I am pleasantly surprised by counterbalancing voices in the community
[14:24] <mconnor> yeah, that's a good sign, and it's good that there's a healthy debate
[14:25] <rickspencer3> yeah
[14:25] <rickspencer3> the word "whore" was used maybe a bit more than I would like :/
[14:25] <mconnor> ah, yes
[14:25] <mconnor> well
[14:25] <mconnor> that'll happen
[14:25] <rickspencer3> but I did want to ensure a good long time to have the discussion and get feedback before we made the change
[14:27] <mconnor> yeah, that's good if you can do it
[14:27] <vish> rickspencer3: slashdot had a nicer twist > "this would seem to mean that Microsoft will be paying people for using Ubuntu"  ;)
[14:28] <rickspencer3> hehe
[14:28] <rickspencer3> I guess
[14:28] <rickspencer3> vish, tbh, it's hard to find companies that *haven't* partnered with Microsoft in some way
[14:28] <rickspencer3> they have deals with everyone, it seems
[14:28]  * rickspencer3 checks slashdot
[14:29] <mconnor> MS isn't _nearly_ as evil as they used to be
[14:29] <rickspencer3> hehe
[14:29] <rickspencer3> right, ever since I quit
[14:30] <rickspencer3> :/
[14:30] <mconnor> d'oh
[14:30] <rickspencer3> I lowered the Microsoft evil average, and raised the Canonical level ;)
[14:30] <rickspencer3> j/k
[14:30] <mconnor> I mean, I know MS wants to make lots of money.  I'm cool with that.
[14:30] <rickspencer3> yeah, well, they don't make it like they used to
[14:30] <mconnor> true
[14:30] <rickspencer3> I still have a few friends who work there, and it seems things have changed
[14:31] <mconnor> but the license to print money thing was never going to last, it didn't for IBM either
[14:31] <rickspencer3> yup
[14:31] <rickspencer3> tbh, they are still pretty evil, I think
[14:31] <rickspencer3> in the sense that they would make things the way they used to be if they could
[14:31] <BUGabundo_work> humm
[14:31] <mconnor> sure, and google wants to know everything you do online
[14:32] <BUGabundo_work> does the new agreement with Yahoo, mean they will fix their pages to work with Ubuntu ?
[14:32] <BUGabundo_work> and any FLOSS browser?
[14:32] <mconnor> any?
[14:32] <BUGabundo_work> ok, major
[14:32] <mconnor> doubtful, we've had agreements for years ;)
[14:32] <BUGabundo_work> mconnor: and you are ?
[14:32] <BUGabundo_work> firefox dev?
[14:33] <mconnor> but they really just need to fix their UA sniffing
[14:33] <mconnor> yup
[14:33]  * BUGabundo_work confirms with /whois
[15:04] <micahg> asac: we can update the package hook to allow bugs to be filed
[15:05] <asac> micahg: thanks. i think we already did that
[15:05] <micahg> asac: yeah, that's what pitti said, but it doesn't work :(
[15:05] <asac> micahg: is that true for hardy?
[15:05] <micahg> idk
[15:06] <micahg> it doesn't work on karmic
[15:11] <micahg> asac: it's not in the ff36 hook
[15:11] <micahg> and the ff36 hook isn't installed
[15:18] <asac> micahg: we should merge it over for sure
[15:18] <asac> now that we have a package to file bugs against
[15:18] <micahg> asac: it's in there, just the install is disabled
[15:18] <asac> guess we already renamed the source package to firefox?
[15:18] <asac> ah ok
[15:18] <micahg> yep
[15:18] <asac> thats easy enough
[15:18] <asac> lets see who first gets to it. would be good to have it in tomorrows dailes
[15:19] <asac> ... ok
[15:19] <micahg> ok
[15:19]  * asac has to get lunch
[15:27] <[reed]> BUGabundo_work: mconnor is the module owner for Firefox
[15:31] <[reed]> rickspencer3: at least you get to live in our (Mozilla's) world for a while when we release some new feature ;)
[15:32] <[reed]> like take the awesomebar for example
[15:32] <rickspencer3> hehe
[15:32] <rickspencer3> [reed], I remember when the awesome bar rolled out
[15:32] <rickspencer3> funny to think that people objected at the time
[15:32] <[reed]> people still object!
[15:32] <[reed]> it's hilarious
[15:33] <[reed]> especially because then every other browser copied us
[15:33] <[reed]> :P
[15:33] <BUGabundo_work> well I LOVE IT
[15:33] <BUGabundo_work> I don't remember if I cried FAUL or not
[15:33] <rickspencer3> huh
[15:33] <BUGabundo_work> I miss it in chromium :(
[15:33] <rickspencer3> awesome bar is the awesomest
[15:33] <BUGabundo_work> +1 rickspencer3
[15:34] <rickspencer3> [reed], one meme that worries me regarding the Yahoo! default change is that some folks are saying that we are screwing over Mozilla
[15:34] <rickspencer3> *sigh*
[15:35] <rickspencer3> it's sad when people make up information, and that becomes the dominant point of discussion
[15:35] <rickspencer3> it's like American politics
[15:35] <BUGabundo_work> err
[15:35] <BUGabundo_work> well FWIR
[15:36] <BUGabundo_work> mozilla used to have a cut in hits done by google search
[15:40] <[reed]> "used to" for some definition of time and space ;)
[15:41] <BUGabundo_work> [reed]: I'm not sure if it ever ended and if so, when
[15:41] <[reed]> ah
[15:41] <[reed]> well, official Firefox builds still partner with Google in some parts of the world
[15:41] <BUGabundo_work> [reed]: but feel free to enlint me
[15:41] <[reed]> I thought you were talking about Ubuntu
[15:42] <BUGabundo_work> I have no idea of the limitations of Ubuntu/canonical builds
[15:42] <mconnor> in some parts of the world?
[15:42] <[reed]> s/some/most/
[15:42] <[reed]> but not all
[15:42] <mconnor> Russia, I guess?
[15:43] <[reed]> yeah, and I think there's some other place(s), too
[15:43] <mconnor> not that I recall
[15:43] <[reed]> been a while since I looked at kev bugs
[15:43] <mconnor> we had a brief period with Yahoo in Asia
[15:44] <[reed]> thought we still had Yahoo! somewhere
[15:44] <[reed]> Japan?
[15:44] <mconnor> no
[15:44] <mconnor> there are partner builds thought
[15:44] <mconnor> though
[15:44] <[reed]> ah
[15:46] <mconnor> rickspencer3: fwiw, it's not an awful concern, and tricky to dissuade without saying some stuff
[15:46] <mconnor> like pointing out relative user bases...
[15:47] <rickspencer3> mconnor, sorry, not 100% certain what you are referring to :/
[15:48] <mconnor> rickspencer3: the "screwing over Mozilla" meme
[15:48] <rickspencer3> ah
[15:49] <rickspencer3> right
[15:50] <mconnor> rickspencer3: I mean, it's amusing, in a way, that people are worried about us not making enough money, considering how often others rail at us for making too much ;)
[15:50] <rickspencer3> lol
[15:52] <mconnor> some Debian guy actually accused us of being corrupted by money at FOSDEM last year
[15:54] <rickspencer3> I am about to go get corrupted by food
[15:54] <rickspencer3> (i.e. have some breakfast and use the energy from that to do more work ;) )
[15:57] <mconnor> mmm, breakfast
[16:19] <fta2> asac, http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=33163
[16:19] <fta2> asac, nss related
[16:27] <micahg> rickspencer3: I think this line from the slashdot post is great:  Since Yahoo search is now powered by Microsoft's Bing, this would seem to mean that Microsoft will be paying people for using Ubuntu.
[16:34] <asac> :)
[16:34] <asac> yeah
[16:41] <_Groo_> asac: hi asac
[16:42] <BUGabundo_work> wow double ping  ;)
[16:42] <_Groo_> asac: BUGabundo_work told me to ask you about the nm 0.8 regression (3g modems not showing up in nm-applet, altought they register correctly in the system)
[16:42] <_Groo_> asac: it only works if i boot with the 3g modem already in the usb port...
[16:43] <_Groo_> asac: is there a workaround for it? tried evetyhing i could think of.. restarting nm, nm-applet, removing options and usbserial, replugging, even restarting udev
[16:43] <asac> what modem is that _Groo_ ?
[16:43] <asac> _Groo_: have you tried the latest from our daily ppa?
[16:44] <_Groo_> asac: im using the lucid ones, whats the ppa? the modem is a onda
[16:44] <_Groo_> asac: Bus 002 Device 003: ID 19d2:0001 ONDA Communication S.p.A.
[16:44] <_Groo_> asac: this was working fine with 8.04 and up, till now...
[16:45] <_Groo_> asac: ok sometimes it got intermitent aka having to replug it, but never not showing up in nm-applet after the ttyUSB* are created
[16:45] <_Groo_> asac: can you paste the url for the ppa? ill be happy to test it
[16:47] <asac> _Groo_: the lucis ones should be up to date
[16:47] <asac> enough
[16:47] <asac> hmm
[16:47] <asac> _Groo_: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingModemmanager
[16:47] <asac> please do that
[16:50] <_Groo_> asac: gonna do that and ill get back to you
[16:50] <asac> kk
[16:51] <micahg> asac: does xul-1.9.2 need to have xul191 changelog merged in?
[16:53] <asac> micahg: yeah. and we need to check if all the changes actually made it into that branch
[16:54] <micahg> asac: the only thing I know is missing is dh_xul which I'll add later tonight
[16:54] <micahg> but I can do a diff of the packaging branches to see if anything else is missing
[16:57] <micahg> bbiab
[17:00] <asac> micahg: yes. that would be good.
[19:00] <fta> http://glandium.org/blog/?p=854
[19:00] <fta> debian 561927 :)
[19:06]  * [reed] rolls eyes
[19:06] <[reed]> he's completely wrong as usual
[20:02] <asac_> heh
[20:20] <fta> asac_, about the codecs, should i just upload and wait? or do you see something that needs to be improved 1st?
[20:22] <asac_> fta: is the license file correct?
[20:22] <asac_> dont have it in front of me
[20:22] <asac_> would have to check
[20:23] <fta> asac_, it's mostly a copy of the ffmpeg one
[20:23] <fta> needs review for sure
[20:24] <asac_> ok. does the ffmpeg package do some stripping in get-orig-source or something?
[20:24] <asac_> e.g. is that dfsg?
[20:25] <asac_> if so we should check if we can strip the same
[20:34] <bdrung> asac_: do you have time in 30 mins to sponsor an ff extension (webfav)?
[20:35] <asac_> bdrung: what changes?
[20:35] <bdrung> asac_: rename to xul-ext-<foo>
[20:35] <asac_> is that in debian?
[20:35] <asac_> who is maintainer there?
[20:36] <bdrung> asac_: it's my rename all ubuntu only packages to xul-ext-<foo>
[20:36] <bdrung> asac_: we are the maintainer and it's only in ubuntu.
[20:37] <asac_> why are the source packages renamed?
[20:37] <gnomefreak> micahg: are you around? i have a few questions
[20:37] <asac_> was there any real reason (dont want to question things again)
[20:37] <asac_> ?
[20:37] <bdrung> asac_: binary packages (not source)
[20:37] <asac_> i thoght that was only for binary package names
[20:37] <asac_> ah
[20:38] <asac_> bfiller: is the webfav extension free floating or is anyone from your team maintaining that?
[20:38] <bdrung> asac_: my only source change was showcase
[20:38] <asac_> bfiller: e.g. packaging wise
[20:38] <asac_> bdrung: i think we hsould wait for bfiller, but in general yes. i can sponsor that
[20:38] <gnomefreak> i thouhgt source name == rename and depends on bin name
[20:39] <bdrung> gnomefreak: ?
[20:39] <asac_> dont understand that either ;)
[20:39] <asac_> maybe rephrase
[20:40] <gnomefreak76> damnit
[20:40] <micahg> gnomefreak: yes
[20:41] <gnomefreak> micahg: why was SM2 SM2.1 striped of the gnome-support and other binaries (off hand dont recall what was built with it outside of the gnome-*
[20:41] <micahg> shouldn't have been
[20:41] <gnomefreak> oh yeah *-browser and so on
[20:41] <micahg> I haven't looked at his package yet
[20:41] <micahg> probably done wrong
[20:42] <gnomefreak> micahg: his PPA doesnt have any of it
[20:42] <micahg> I take no responsibility for his package
[20:42]  * gnomefreak just installed both 2.0 2.1 and no other binaries were with it
[20:42] <micahg> I haven't had time to review
[20:42] <micahg> next week hopefully
[20:42] <micahg> that's what I told him
[20:43] <gnomefreak> micahg: i know that. just mentioning to ask him about it if im not here. but in no way is it close to ready
[20:43] <micahg> k, gnomefreak
[20:43] <gnomefreak> he said he built off my branch but nothing is close to how i had it
[20:44] <gnomefreak> micahg: thanks
[20:44] <micahg> gnomefreak: BTW, we got the ok for the meeting, during/after 2nd week of feb
[20:44] <gnomefreak> ok was it posted to the mailing list?
[20:44] <micahg> gnomefreak: just need to find a time that you, me, asac, and fta are available
[20:45] <micahg> with 2 weeks notice for the comminity
[20:45] <gnomefreak> other than the 8th it looks like im open for now
[20:46] <micahg> fta: when's a good meeting time for you?
[20:47] <fta> micahg, i pass, don't wait for me
[20:47] <asac_> _Groo_: did you get that mode info?
[20:47] <asac_> modem
[20:48] <micahg> asac_: how does feb 11 around 16:00 UTC look?
[20:48] <_Groo_> asac_: sorry asac_ not yet , im gonna test it tonight or tomorrow at least
[20:51] <asac_> micahg: for meeting?
[20:51] <micahg> asac_: yes
[20:51] <asac_> micahg: looks good
[20:52] <asac_> so fta isnt coming ;)?
[20:53] <micahg> gnomefreak76: Feb 11 16:00 UTC work?
[20:55] <gnomefre1k76> damnit
[20:55] <micahg> gnomefre1k76: Feb 11 16:00 UTC work?
[20:56] <gnomefre1k76> ok it is ~20:55 UTC right?
[20:56] <micahg> yes
[20:57] <gnomefre1k76> give me a minute my brain is failing atm
[20:57] <micahg> 11AM EST
[20:57] <gnomefre1k76> ah yes
[20:57] <bdrung> asac_: pushed to https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/webfav.ubuntu
[20:57] <gnomefre1k76> the 11th sounds good
[20:57] <gnomefre1k76> micahg: asac_ ok ill add it to my calendar
[20:57] <micahg> gnomefre1k76: do you want to write something up and I'll get it posted to the fridge
[20:58] <gnomefre1k76> we have an agenda wiki page but i will add the date and time we still need an agenda points
[20:58] <gnomefre1k76> s/an/
[20:59] <bdrung> asac_: should we rename ubufox, too?
[20:59] <gnomefre1k76> wtf is with the nane
[20:59] <bdrung> gnomefre1k76: ?
[20:59] <bfiller> asac_: no one is really maintaining it, but I could help if there is work needed
[20:59] <bfiller> asac_: for webfav that is
[21:00] <micahg> gnomefre1k76: I see the agenda page and it's empty :)
[21:00] <gnomefre1k76> give me a minute to get my nick right :(
[21:00] <gnomefre1k76> micahg: it should be noone has aded anything to it
[21:01] <bdrung> bfiller: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/webfav.ubuntu/+merge/18162
[21:02] <gnomefre1k76> ill be back in a minute :(
[21:02] <gnomefreak> ok feel better now
[21:04] <micahg> http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2010-01-27/multi-process-plugins-on-by-default/
[21:05] <gnomefreak> oh this can only end badly :(
[21:05] <gnomefreak> the link in topic that is
[21:08] <bfiller> bdrung: I'm fine with this change, just clear it with asac_
[21:15] <gnomefreak76> this is starting to piss me off now
[21:16] <gnomefreak> ok micahg can you please add the date/time/whatever else you want to be there. I seem to be haivng issues with network i keep losing connection
[21:16] <micahg> gnomefreak: I'm not so sure about an agenda
[21:16] <micahg> I can add the time
[21:17] <gnomefreak> micahg: ok we can discuss agenda later but mainly to get everyone on same page with Lucid Mozilla ect..
[21:18] <gnomefreak> at this rate ill never get to email
[21:20] <micahg> k
[21:23] <gnomefreak> thanks
[21:24] <bdrung> asac_: your input is required: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/webfav.ubuntu/+merge/18162
[21:54] <gnomefreak> micahg: also with SM* we need to set signon.startup.prompt to false by default. user will set that when they set up a master password
[21:54] <micahg> gnomefreak: k
[21:55] <gnomefreak> its a bug (havent looked at the bug itself yet but it should not prompt you to give password before browser will open
[21:55] <gnomefreak> )*\
[21:56] <gnomefreak> ok really hate this theme bullshit bug :( im gone for the day im not having a good day at all
[22:38] <mbana> how can i watch http://www.apple.com/ipad/ipad-video/#medium
[22:38] <mbana> on linux
[22:39] <micahg> mbana: virtualbox
[22:40] <micahg> seems like apple is doing some checks instead of letting the browser do the right thing
[22:40]  * micahg suggests writing apple
[22:45] <gavin> pretty sure that won't be very productive :)
[23:05] <bdrung> asac_: can you merge https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-dev/firefox-extensions/ubufox.ubuntu?
[23:05] <fta> mbana, just open this in totem: http://movies.apple.com/media/us/ipad/2010/tours/apple-ipad-video-us-20100127_r480-9cie.mov
[23:12] <asac_> bdrung: why do you push that to ubuntu-dev?
[23:13] <bdrung> asac_: because i am not a core-dev, where should i push it instead?
[23:14] <asac_> as a topic branch ... aka merge request
[23:14] <asac_> that one is named like a release branch which its not
[23:15] <bdrung> k
[23:16] <asac_> usually you push that to ~bdrung
[23:16] <bdrung> asac_: will rename it
[23:16] <asac_> no need to put stuff in ubnutu-dev namespace that is a merg
[23:16] <asac_> e
[23:17] <bdrung> asac_: moved to https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/rename-ubufox
[23:18] <asac_> good
[23:18] <bdrung> asac_: merge request does not work (This branch is not mergeable into lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/ubufox/ubuntu.)
[23:18] <asac_> why?
[23:18] <asac_> hmm
[23:18] <bdrung> asac_: probably a bug
[23:19] <asac_> lets hope
[23:19] <bdrung> asac_: you should fix the patch system part of ubufox (quilt, but only direct changes)
[23:23] <asac_> yes
[23:23] <asac_> i will think about it
[23:28] <bdrung> asac_: can you merge https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/firefox-extensions/rename-webfav and release it then?
[23:29] <bdrung> bfiller was fine with my changes
[23:30] <asac_> will not work today ;) ... upgrading my system then going to sleep early
[23:31] <bdrung> k, good night then
[23:32] <asac_> u2
[23:33] <asac_> upgrade to lucid finished ;) ... lets hope