[00:13] kenvandine: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327172 [00:13] Ubuntu bug 327172 in gwibber "Gwibber lists jump to top of page when updated" [Medium,Confirmed] [00:13] never fixed ? [00:13] :( [00:19] omg i feel like dying;) [00:19] horror trip [00:19] now in portland [00:19] i installed 3.6 via ppa. how do i uninstall it? [00:20] recmajkemi: what does uninstall mean? [00:20] downgrade to 3.5? [00:20] asac: wb [00:20] what happened ? [00:21] dont ask ;) [00:21] well in the end all was good [00:21] but it was like going through minefields [00:21] first 3 hours on the runway in hamburg [00:21] asac: yes downgrade [00:21] because of snow [00:21] then late in frankfurt almost missed the plane (was stnading in security still 30 minutes after the depature time) [00:22] too late... just did [00:22] same in seattle due to the delay ;) [00:22] lost a bunch of things (not sure what exactly yet) [00:22] asac: next time *shave* [00:22] in one for the many security stuff [00:22] so you don't look like a terrostist [00:22] ohh that's bad :( [00:23] that's one of the reason I don't want to set foot into USoA [00:23] and all that with 3 hours sleep the day before and almost no sleep yesterday ;) [00:23] so now i am bad ;) [00:23] recmajkemi: at best uninstall all firefox packages ... then remove ppa and install them again [00:27] BUGabundo, next auto-respin is at 5am (my time) so if they fix it quickly, it will be ok [00:28] they _won't_ [00:28] so we're doomed [00:28] asac, nice to see you're still alive :) [00:28] asac: idid that but via desktop shorcut im still able to open ff 3.6 ill try to reboot [00:29] BUGabundo, i don't understand why to pushed it in trunk if it's broken [00:29] trunk is always supposed to work [00:29] they didn't test lucid [00:29] it works in 9.10 [00:31] lololol segphault is _debuging_ in identica [00:31] FAIL [00:33] the stuppidest thing: they are changing gwibber in the same week it finally get to work without any probs :\\\ [00:33] Murphys Law, I guess [00:33] if it is broken its gonna get worse. if it is working, don't care, it will break [01:02] fta: ♺ @segphault: @BUGabundo: I pushed a fix to trunk for the bug you found on 10.04. Thanks for bringing it to my attention! [01:11] fta: it working, but mostly borked [01:11] no qaiku, no StatusNet servers other then identica, no jaiku, no themes, [01:53] BUGabundo, are the deb empty? [01:54] no idea [01:54] all I know is what I read on identica [01:55] hm; indeed [01:57] not my fault though [01:58] whoever introduced gwibber-service broke it [02:00] oh great... a one he said, she aid fight [02:01] ? [02:03] fta: after upgrading gwibber .. i can open/execute it :( [02:03] read above [02:04] funny, when built on karmic, the debs are not empty [02:04] * ejat reading .. [02:06] fta, which packaging branch is the daily head builds using? [02:06] fta, i pushed it to lp:~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging.trunk [02:06] which has worked for several people today, that installed it from my ppa [02:07] fta, are you still seeing problems? [02:07] when i build locally, it's fine, but in the ppa, the debs end up empty [02:07] empty! [02:08] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38566452/buildlog_ubuntu-lucid-i386.gwibber_2.29.1~bzr502-0ubuntu2~daily1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz [02:08] look close to the end [02:08] https://edge.launchpad.net/~ken-vandine/+archive/gwibber/+packages [02:08] i didn't do anything special [02:09] which packaging branch is that from? [02:14] diff .. bzr496 n bzr502 [02:14] lp:~gwibber-team/gwibber/packaging.trunk [02:14] i wanted to fix it, but i have no idea what's causing this [02:14] and it's 3am+ [02:14] ejat: there just a few commts in to fix some bugs I found [02:15] owh ok [02:16] we are now at 504 [02:16] and one more coming [02:17] so I assume that tomorrow gona be a bad day for gwibbers daily ppa [02:17] :P [02:17] BUGabundo: haa :p [02:17] dh_link -pgwibber dh_link -pgwibber [02:17] dh_installmime -pgwibber dh_installmime -pgwibber [02:17] dh_pycentral -pgwibber dh_pycentral -pgwibber [02:17] renaming debian/gwibber/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages to debian/gwibber/usr/lib/python2.6/dist < [02:17] dh_installdocs -pgwibber-service ./README ./AUTHORS dh_installdocs -pgwibber-service ./README ./AUTHORS [02:17] dh_installexamples -pgwibber-service dh_installexamples -pgwibber-service [02:17] http://paste.ubuntu.com/365964/ [02:18] dh_pycentral is not doing the same thing [02:20] in my karmic pbuilder, i see "renaming debian/gwibber/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages to debian/gwibber/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages", it's not done in the ppa [02:20] so your *.install files don't match and the debs end up empty [02:20] kenvandine, ^^ [02:21] oh... so it is failing in karmic and not in lucid? [02:21] I tought it was the other way around [02:21] OOHH WAIT [02:21] or the other way around [02:21] maybe it's the fix for lucid [02:21] that seg added [02:21] it is building in my ppa fine for lucid [02:21] its messing it up [02:21] that was a trivial change [02:22] nope, it's failing everywhere [02:22] from branchs it was running in karmic but not lucid [02:22] and he pushed a fix [02:22] right, if the db hadn't already done it's oauth thing [02:22] but that was trivial, no impact on packaging [02:23] fta but in my ppa the debs aren't empty... [02:23] * kenvandine will look deeped [02:23] deeper [02:24] fta, the py_central thing must be version specific [02:25] dh_pycentral -pgwibber-service [02:25] renaming debian/gwibber-service/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages to debian/gwibber-service/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages [02:25] dh_strip -pgwibber [02:26] from the build log in my ppa [02:26] so the question is why isn't that happening in the ~gwibber-team ppa [02:32] all the "copying build/lib.linux-i686-2.6/gwibber/..." are missing too [02:33] hm, no, nm [02:47] kenvandine, no idea, i give up :( [02:47] fta, i'll try to look at it more [02:47] it's bazaar [02:48] it works in my lucid pbuilder and in my ppa [02:48] crazy that it doesn't work in that ppa [02:52] kenvandine, pycentral won't rename if pversion is ('python2.3', 'python2.4', 'python2.5') === ripps is now known as ripps|sleep [09:46] anyone awake? i have an issue i neeed to know source package for? [10:24] it seems to be a known bug fixed it by changing settings in keyboard menu :) [10:24] * gnomefreak goes and lays down while updates and scripts are running [12:14] Hello [12:14] Firefox 3.7 still doesn't work!!!! [12:14] and upstream Firefox 3.7 works [12:14] so, it is problem with your packages [12:14] fix it!!! [12:16] Milos_SD: can you be more specific? [12:17] Firefox 3.7 freezes when needs to load flash [12:17] it has been fixed upstream (I downloaded precompiled binary from mozilla ftp) [12:17] and it works [12:17] but yours from PPA still freezes [12:18] Milos_SD: which version upstream? [12:19] just a sec [12:22] http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/tinderbox-builds/mozilla-central-linux64/ [12:22] from here [12:23] even the one from 29. works [12:25] hmm [12:27] you're running the latest daily from us? [12:27] yes [12:27] and it freezes and loading flash on web sites [12:27] but the one from that ftp link, doesn't [12:27] it has some issues with youtube controls, but it doesn't freez [12:34] * micahg is attempting a backtrace [12:41] kenvandine, http://paste.ubuntu.com/366164/ [13:08] micahg, any success? === ripps|sleep is now known as ripps [13:36] Is icedtea java plugin incompatible with Firefox 3.6? [14:01] humm chanserv dead? [14:10] BUGabundo, http://paste.ubuntu.com/366169/ was it your error? [14:11] fta: yep [14:11] I have gwibber upgrade on hold [14:11] so it's still broken [14:11] and am testing a few branchs a gain [14:11] ahahaah [14:11] I'm on yesterday deb :D [14:12] I hate to say it (or maybe not) but I told you so [14:12] * BUGabundo duck [14:12] i thought segphault fixed it yesterday after you complained [14:13] no [14:13] he pushed a few things, and it worked [14:14] but then it broke again [14:17] i still don't understand why couchdb is needed in a microblogging client [14:17] it syncs between PCs [14:17] sync what? [14:18] gwibber status [14:18] but you need an http(s) server for that, right? [14:19] fta if you start gwibber-service [14:20] wait for it to pull stuff and only then start gwibber, it works [14:20] Trunk is WFM fine [14:20] fta: it uses UbuntuOne for sync [14:20] damn [14:21] i don't have an U1 account, and i don't want one [14:21] if it's now mandatory, bye bye gwibber [14:21] don't need one [14:21] I don't have mine up (or even instaled) and gwibber trunk is working [14:21] but its TOO soon to make it trunk [14:22] no themes, no StatusNet server support, no spellchecker [14:22] no jaiku (lost and not ported since 1.x) , no qaiku [14:23] but I really love the new side pane :DD [14:23] uber nice for small screens [14:24] pfff http://paste.ubuntu.com/366231/ [14:29] trink? [14:29] *trunk ? [14:30] r506 [14:31] Now on revision 506. [14:31] ./bin/gwibber-service & ; sleep 30; ./bin/gwibber [14:34] ok, byebye gwibber, it's not usable, and they don't really know how to keep a trunk alive and attractive for testers [14:34] http://paste.ubuntu.com/366239/ [14:35] ehe [15:05] BUGabundo, how do you shorten a link in the web interface? [15:08] fta: where? [15:08] for manual links I use punny.sl.pt [15:09] for posting to SNs I use hellotxt and ping.fm [15:15] i don't why there's a pref then, it doesn't do anything [15:15] +understand [15:16] for ? [15:45] hello! [15:45] hey Tallken [15:46] am I the only one who has been experiencing random lookups with Firefox-3.6 ? I downgraded o Karmic's Firefox to see if the lookups continue (since I didn't uninstall the plugins) but still I thought I'd ask here [15:46] hey BUGabundo [15:49] Tallken: separated processes in daily [15:49] turn it off for a few days, until fixed [15:49] hum? in 3.6 ? [15:50] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=543037 [15:50] yes [15:50] Mozilla bug 543037 in Plug-ins "OOPP freeze" [Major,Unconfirmed] [15:50] [reed]: we are doomed... your guys don't even know where to start fixing it :( [15:51] but ain't that supposed to be in the firefox-3.7 package?? [15:52] no [15:52] 3.6 also has it [15:53] cool [15:54] will continue with firefox-3.5 then [15:54] why?? [15:54] thanks for the explanation, BUGabundo [15:54] just turn it off [15:54] and remember to enable it in a week [15:54] BUGabundo, well, because it's slower but stable [15:54] http://benjamin.smedbergs.us/blog/2010-01-27/multi-process-plugins-on-by-default/ [15:55] 3.7 is now stable for me again [15:55] found the bug, reported, work around it [15:55] world is happy [15:56] BUGabundo, if I kill mozilla-runtime the browser returns from the dead? [15:57] no idea [15:57] hum... will stay with firefox-3.5 [15:57] if i get too pissed with its speed will go back to 3..6 [15:57] BUGabundo, thanks for the help & links :) [15:58] 3.5 isssss slloowwwww [15:58] 3.7 is faster [15:58] and chromium is just another league === yofel_ is now known as yofel [16:45] BUGabundo, concerning "and chromium is just another league" http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_chrome_vs_iron.php [16:46] anyway, gotta go [16:46] went [17:06] bdrung: should devscripts bugs be filed against the ubuntu package with a task on the m-dev project? [17:18] micahg: it's up to you. either this or you can file a bug against the package in debian [17:39] bdrung: ok [17:39] bdrung: BTW, it worked great once I removed the langpacks that had a bad install.rdf [18:16] micahg, is there hope that firefox 3.7 freez issue with flash be fixed in tomorows update? :) [18:16] Milos_SD: depends if I have time to debug...probably not :( [18:16] maybe tomorrow [18:18] micahg, ok. But why debug? Problem is part-fixed in upstream (I think) [18:19] Milos_SD: well, we build upstream's version [18:19] so if I can figure out which function is roke [18:19] *broke, I can see the patch that fixed it and try to figure out why it doesn't work in our build [18:20] is there a way I can help with backtraceing the problem? :) Or do I need programing knowledge to do that? [18:21] * micahg thinks he'll just ask upstream :) [18:22] asac, i'm trying to clarify/update the d/copyright file for the codecs package, what do you think? http://paste.ubuntu.com/366321/ [18:34] micahg1: great [18:38] micahg1: 515217 is not a bug in m-d, but in rdflib [18:42] bdrung: k, sorry, i'll ,move it [18:43] micahg1: i moved it [18:43] bdrung: k, should I invalidate the m-dev task? [18:44] micahg1: already done. ;) [18:45] * micahg1 is checking upstream [19:03] bdrung: I filed a bug upstream [19:04] micahg1: yes, i saw it [19:17] fta: so ... maybe use the dep-5 format style instead of "Here is the text of the MIT license:" [19:18] you can use [19:18] License: MIT [19:18] License text ... [19:18] line 2 [19:18] etc. [19:18] how do you add comments? [19:18] comments? [19:19] descriptions [19:19] what is a description in what you pasted? [19:19] i see license texts [19:20] those would be one-char indented [19:20] so you can refer in a files: block to MIT .... and then you would have one License: MIT block at the end with the license text [19:20] but i guess thats not what yo umean [19:21] l4-10, 30, 68-70.. [19:22] imho, l30-65 is just confusing [19:23] so instead of "most files under balbalbla/ are licensed under LGPL..." you just say [19:23] Files: balbalbla/* [19:23] License: LGPL-2.1+ [19:24] and then you name specific files with different license [19:24] Files: ffmpeg-mt.tar.gz!/ffmpeg-mt/libavcodec/x86/h264_deblock_sse2.asm [19:24] License: MIT [19:24] etc. [19:25] the license 4-10 belong to README.sources [19:25] not copyright [19:25] README.source [19:25] line 1-2 can be scratched [19:25] instead use debian/* [19:25] Copyright Fabien Tassin... [19:26] and then [19:26] debian/patches/* [19:26] like you did just below [19:28] well, i only checked in details the files that are build (those listed in the gyp file), for the rest, i just pasted the LICENSE file [19:28] built [19:33] asac: I think tb-locales is ready [19:33] * micahg1 should probably test build on Lucid though... [19:44] micahg: does it work on karmic? [19:44] can you put that stuff up somewhere and send me a link? [19:44] i am probably not in that much longer [19:45] asac: https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/+packages [19:45] just need to rename .orig.tar.gz and changelog entry [19:45] it shows up in my shredder install, but not as compatible since I'm running 3.0.1pre [19:46] micahg: does the ${xpi:recommends} etc. work? [19:46] hmm [19:46] no [19:46] :( [19:46] (iassume so ... just wonder if you checked it) [19:46] no? [19:46] so it inserts "thunderbird-3.0" rather than thunderbird? [19:46] * micahg forgot to ask bdrung about that [19:46] no [19:47] micahg: what do you want to know? [19:47] http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/366381/ [19:47] asac: shredder picks it up properly in thunderbird [19:47] micahg: gimme the source, please [19:48] bdrung: https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/+files/thunderbird-locales_3.0~micahg+try2-0ubuntu1~karmic~ppa3.diff.gz [19:48] asac: should we make a bzr branch for TB localeS? [19:48] micahg: dsc or bzr branch? [19:48] bdrung: https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/+files/thunderbird-locales_3.0~micahg+try2-0ubuntu1~karmic~ppa3.dsc [19:49] https://edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/+archive/mozilla-test/+files/thunderbird-locales_3.0~micahg+try2-0ubuntu1~lucid~ppa1.dsc [19:49] yeah [19:49] asac: I filed 3 locale bugs upstream and cc'd you [19:52] micahg: it's your fault :P [19:52] bdrung: k, please enlighten me [19:53] micahg: you use "%: dh --with xul-ext $@", but % is never called, because you define the other targets [19:53] ah [19:53] micahg: you either use the override_* targets or you call dh_xul-ext manually [19:54] ah, so do I just add % to the install target? [19:54] or build? [19:55] bdrung: ^^ === micahg is now known as micahg-test [19:57] micahg: either drop configure, install, binary, clean rules (and use the override_* targets), or you drop the % target and call dh_xul-ext in binary-indep target === micahg-test is now known as micahg [19:57] micahg: man dh [20:01] * micahg is at a loss [20:02] bdrung: do I get rid of the install and buidl targets then? [20:03] micahg: yes [20:03] bdrung: k [20:04] micahg: dh calls all these dh_* commands [20:07] bdrung: still doesn't work [20:07] * micahg is sure he's missing something simple === BUGabundo is now known as BUGabundo_dinner [20:08] micahg: your rules file should look like http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-xmms2/abraca.git;a=blob;f=debian/rules;h=d42a2ee134247c9d487b71fa523da6e64f4a7d01;hb=HEAD after the cleanup [20:12] * micahg is testing [20:13] \o/ [20:13] uh oh [20:13] I missed something [20:13] I'm getting copyright errors [20:14] or rather warning [20:15] micahg: you may run install-xpi with -r [20:16] what does that do? [20:16] nm [20:16] micahg: man install-xpi :P [20:16] no, but it was installed before [20:17] micahg: installed before? [20:17] yes, in the previous version [20:24] bdrung: nm [20:24] needed a full rebuild [20:25] nm? [20:25] nevermind [20:25] k [20:30] bdrung: if I think I can bump to compat 7, should I? [20:30] micahg: if you use dh, then you have to. [20:30] k [20:34] bdrung: thanks for your help, I'm still learning debhelper [20:34] np [20:34] it takes some time [20:34] * micahg found lintian.debian.org which is nice [20:35] dh is really amazing [20:36] bdrung: I've got one weird character issue [20:36] micahg: which? [20:36] on the nb-no locale, is there some way to make sure the shell is using UTF8? [20:37] when building the file? [20:37] if you take a look at the control file... [20:37] micahg: isn't utf-8 the default? [20:37] * micahg would think so [20:38] but for some reason, that locale when generated from the system locales gets mangled [20:38] it's fine in the original xml file [20:38] it's getting mangled somehow in here: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/366409/ [20:39] micahg: gedit opened the control file as iso-8859-15 [20:40] yeah [20:40] but it should be UTF8 [20:40] micahg: you should remove the last line ( .) in package.template [20:40] but for some reason, it's generated like that [20:41] k [20:41] * micahg didn't know if it did anything [20:43] dunno how to fix the utf-8 issue [20:43] k [20:45] bdrung: ok, here's an issue maybe you can help with...as asac pointed out, it seems to Enhance TB3.0 instead of just TB..is there anything I can do? [20:46] micahg: does it support thunderbird 3? [20:46] yes, but the package will be thunderbird === BUGabundo_dinner is now known as BUGabundo [20:46] micahg: so no versioned thunderbird package? [20:47] bdrung: in archive [20:47] i meant: no versioned source tb package? [20:47] bdrung: in archive [20:47] where else? [20:47] in PPA yes, but in archive no [20:49] micahg: will tb 3 land in lucid? [20:49] bdrung: yes, I think as soon as this package is done :) [20:49] and the source and binary package will be called thunderbird? [20:50] bdrung: yes [20:50] micahg: ok, then we have to update m-d to the new package name. [20:50] heh [20:50] ok [20:50] should I make a merge proposal? [20:51] asac: are there other renaming which m-d should be aware of? [20:51] micahg: merge proposal? [20:51] bdrung: firefox will be unversioned in lucid [20:51] for m-dev [20:51] micahg: why merge? we have to release it to sid first and then sync it [20:52] to .head? [20:52] idk [20:52] if you [20:52] 're doing it that's fine [20:52] i can do it. [20:52] k [20:52] micahg: aha, you meant a bzr merge proposal? [20:52] yes :) [20:52] micahg: then go ahead. :) [20:52] is head at lp:mozilla-devscripts? [20:52] micahg: yes [20:56] bdrung: just this file: xul-app-data.csv.Ubuntu [20:56] also, will this break the PPAs? [20:57] micahg: no, because it is in recommends [20:59] so these versions are just for archive then [21:00] micahg: yes [21:04] bdrung: thunderbird-3.0 -> thunderb ird ... firefox-3.6 -> firefox ... thats it for now [21:05] we are not yet sure what to do about future branches and the packag ename [21:05] most likely firefox-dev firefox-next firefox-beta or something [21:05] wow, asac is alive. [21:05] :) [21:06] bdrung: https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~micahg/mozilla-devscripts/ff-tb-unversioned [21:07] asac: we fixed xpi:recommends and such [21:07] last hiccup is it recommends tb-3.0 instead of tb [21:08] micahg: you shouldn't have thunderbird twice [21:08] k [21:11] asac: should I make the unversion firefox and abrowser be * for EOL or leave it 3.6.* fo rnow? [21:12] i would assume * [21:13] BUGabundo, what (gnome/gtk) alternative do we have to gwibber? [21:13] XMPP? [21:13] BUGabundo, btw, did you file a bug for ch loosing passwords? [21:13] µblog purple plugin? [21:13] rss [21:13] fta: only in mozilla [21:13] I'm tempted to file one, but need to look deeper [21:13] since it began happening in my android [21:14] so it may be on google side, if I can't reproduce in other sites [21:17] bdrung: updated [21:20] micahg: good question. [21:20] i would also think * ... but not sure about all the consequences atm [21:21] so test use * [21:21] lets [21:21] ok [21:22] * micahg supposes he could push a version now to test... [21:30] * micahg is testing [21:42] asac: what will happend to xulrunner? [21:42] micahg: i integrated your changes [21:42] yay! [21:42] bdrung: move to universe [21:43] micahg: but what how will the name scheme be? [21:43] bdrung: versioned I think still since it has to do with build-deps [21:43] but firefox will not be using it [21:43] micahg: will there be a xulrunner 1.9.2 in lucid? [21:43] bdrung: yes [21:43] * micahg was working on that last week [21:44] micahg: so i have to add it, too [21:44] * micahg just had to diff xul191 and xul192 to see if anything is missing [21:44] micahg: will there be other new package? [21:46] bdrung: not that I know of at the moment [21:48] bbiab [21:49] bdrung: yeah. xul = versioned ... ffox = unverseioned/release channel named [21:49] ok off for lunch and some shopping in the land without sales tax ;=) [21:50] asac: are you aware of this: http://www.cywhale.de/firefox-3-6-font-rendering/ ? [22:51] kenvandine_, http://paste.ubuntu.com/366164/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/366169/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/366231/ http://paste.ubuntu.com/366239/ [22:55] asac, will dailies by getting cairo again? [22:55] *br [22:55] **be