=== micahg1 is now known as micahg | ||
=== thekorn_ is now known as thekorn | ||
LimCore | hi \o/ | 10:13 |
---|---|---|
LimCore | my laptop is bricked. | 10:13 |
LimCore | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+bug/515950 | 10:14 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 515950 in grub "ubuntu 9.10 with encrypted LVM does not boot after upgrade: svgalib: cannot open /dev/mem" [Undecided,New] | 10:14 |
LimCore | anyon want to debug it with me? | 10:14 |
LimCore | another fail, and I just promised someone to simply install a clean 9.10 ubuntu on a laptop where it worked before... meh | 10:14 |
LimCore | please assign priority medium or high, as normal upgrade of system can make system not-bootable for number of users (~5 reported in the question on which bugreport was made) | 10:16 |
LimCore | for 515950 | 10:16 |
ali1234 | why are bug watch updates for gnome disabled? | 11:04 |
ali1234 | well, my gnome bug was fixed upstream... do i need to do anything? LP bug has a (disabled) watch... | 11:05 |
nigel_nb | bug number? | 11:07 |
ali1234 | bug 485923 | 11:07 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 485923 in gnome-media "Probable memory leak in gnome-settings-daemon/gnome-volume-control-applet" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/485923 | 11:07 |
ali1234 | well i found half my answer: bug 506158 | 11:13 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 506158 in malone "checkwatches hammers the remote server when asking for changed bugs" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/506158 | 11:13 |
LimCore | nigel_nb: could youset a bug priority for me? bug#515950 | 11:14 |
LimCore | bug #515950 | 11:14 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 515950 in grub "ubuntu 9.10 with encrypted LVM does not boot after upgrade: svgalib: cannot open /dev/mem" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/515950 | 11:14 |
nigel_nb | sorry LimCore , I'm not bug control | 11:14 |
nigel_nb | ali1234, well, gnome-volume-control-applet is in main and devs need to get to it | 11:15 |
* LimCore pokes Hobbsee with a unbootable-system-allert poker | 11:15 | |
nigel_nb | ali1234, I'm not sure if I can submit and patch and get MOTU to fix it for me | 11:15 |
Hobbsee | LimCore: did you defenestrate it? | 11:15 |
Hobbsee | nigel_nb: ubuntu-main-sponsors exists for that reason, if you have a patch | 11:16 |
LimCore | huh? "Defenestration is the act of throwing someone or something out of a window" | 11:16 |
Hobbsee | yes :) | 11:17 |
LimCore | dont know what you mean | 11:17 |
LimCore | the laptop? not yet | 11:17 |
Hobbsee | haha | 11:17 |
* Hobbsee pulls out her netbook to try | 11:17 | |
LimCore | can you set priority of this bug, it seems to affect number of poeple | 11:17 |
nigel_nb | Hobbsee, I can try then :) | 11:17 |
nigel_nb | Hobbsee, I'm not an expert though, will you be around in case I have doubts? :) | 11:18 |
LimCore | and it bricks the damn computers, seems a rather serious bug | 11:18 |
Hobbsee | nigel_nb: #ubuntu-devel tends to have people around in it, who woudl be more helpful than myself, but sure | 11:18 |
LimCore | Hobbsee: in last month there where few days where I did NOT found a serious bug in anything I attempted to use in ubuntu. I really hoped that today simple "install the ubuntu on this (compatible) laptop" would go well. | 11:19 |
Hobbsee | surprises me you're still here then | 11:20 |
Hobbsee | but you do manage to find the oddest bugs. | 11:20 |
LimCore | yes I have unique tallent to debug well | 11:20 |
LimCore | or rather, Im one of few few peole that care enought to report and to come here | 11:20 |
LimCore | for 1 bug report I bet there is 100-10000 affected people that do not report | 11:20 |
LimCore | what better place to get the bug fixed then here Hobbsee? Thanks to me a lot of serious bug got fixed faster | 11:21 |
Hobbsee | true | 11:22 |
Hobbsee | downloading, downloading... | 11:22 |
LimCore | btw even one of my ssh (tiny) patches got included to upstream :) | 11:22 |
LimCore | so... can you set prio of this bug? | 11:22 |
LimCore | btw, would it be ok if I paste a 3 line ascii art riddle | 11:22 |
LimCore | perhaps not super family friendly, but fun I guess. It summs up my last days of trying new stuff in ubuntu | 11:23 |
Hobbsee | preferably not, and i figured i'd test it out before putting a prio on it | 11:23 |
LimCore | OpenPGP in kmail not working, multiply reporters. Please set prio low or medium - security bug (can't use OpenPGP), but easy workaround exists - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdepim/+bug/297976 | 11:37 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 297976 in kdepim "kmail: cannot sign emails after upgradind to intrepid ibex" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 11:38 |
LimCore | Hobbsee: while waiting for download, please set prio low (I guess) to above if you can | 11:39 |
LimCore | hmm or medium... because probably fixing it is easy so why use workaround | 11:39 |
milanbv | bdmurray: could you prevent my membership to Bug Control from expiring? my lp account is nalimilan | 11:42 |
Hobbsee | interesting | 11:48 |
LimCore | yes I was very entertained by this bugs too (untill I realize they hold back my work ;) | 11:52 |
balchd | Hi, is possible to remove a nomination I made on a big (#200070)? | 12:05 |
balchd | *bug | 12:05 |
nigel_nb | bug 20070 | 12:06 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 20070 in workrave "workrave hangs after unlocking with input blocked" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/20070 | 12:06 |
nigel_nb | bug 200070 | 12:06 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 200070 in cheese "cheese crashed with SIGSEGV" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/200070 | 12:06 |
balchd | I realised that it's an old bug, and probably not as good a match to my problem as I thought. | 12:06 |
nigel_nb | Well, I think only few people have rights to do that. Don't worry, someone will get around to rejecting it | 12:07 |
balchd | ok, thanks. | 12:07 |
Hobbsee | rejected | 12:17 |
nigel_nb | ah well, Hobbsee was one of the "few people" ;) | 12:20 |
Hobbsee | indeed | 12:20 |
Hobbsee | i'm not sure if i should still have those rights, but there you go | 12:20 |
Hobbsee | it's probably part of -quality | 12:20 |
nigel_nb | Hobbsee, you're core-dev? | 12:20 |
Hobbsee | yes | 12:20 |
nigel_nb | wow! never knew | 12:20 |
balchd | Ta. | 12:21 |
LimCore | Hobbsee: can I help you to mark this bugs importance somehow? | 13:06 |
LimCore | btw, does anyone know workaround to this bug of ubuntu not booting bug #515950 | 13:08 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 515950 in grub "ubuntu 9.10 with encrypted LVM does not boot after upgrade: svgalib: cannot open /dev/mem" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/515950 | 13:08 |
=== mirsal_ is now known as mirsal | ||
LimCore | so can I do something to have bug #515950 fixed faster? | 13:58 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 515950 in grub "ubuntu 9.10 with encrypted LVM does not boot after upgrade: svgalib: cannot open /dev/mem" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/515950 | 13:58 |
LimCore | so... my ubuntu fails to boot entire day. Same happens for many users | 16:02 |
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
LimCore | anyone wants to take a look? bug #515950 | 16:02 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 515950 in grub "ubuntu 9.10 with encrypted LVM does not boot after upgrade: svgalib: cannot open /dev/mem" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/515950 | 16:02 |
charlie-tca | LimCore: Please don't mark your own bugs confirmed | 16:22 |
charlie-tca | When they are marked already, many of us don't look at them again for a long time. | 16:23 |
LimCore | charlie-tca: 5 other people on LP confirmed them! | 16:24 |
LimCore | in the question to which I linked, all is written there | 16:24 |
charlie-tca | Then put that in the report, but you still should not mark it confirmed in status | 16:24 |
LimCore | why not? | 16:24 |
LimCore | other people confirmed them | 16:24 |
charlie-tca | bug-squad policy is to never confirm your own bugs | 16:25 |
LimCore | its not my bug | 16:25 |
micahg | charlie-tca: first line under confirmed in the status wiki page: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286906 | 16:25 |
micahg | oops | 16:25 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 286906 in xulrunner "provide and support a top-level library package for libmozjs (Was: Unable to use libmozjs.so in an application, because of library path problem.)" [Unknown,Confirmed] | 16:25 |
micahg | Another reporter has experienced the same bug, this can come in the form of a duplicate bug or a bug comment | 16:25 |
LimCore | sigh | 16:25 |
micahg | charlie-tca: as i understood it, confirmed ones own bugs was on a second system | 16:26 |
micahg | not changing status based on another duplicate bug or comment | 16:26 |
LimCore | Asked by Zaki Akhmad on on 2009-11-10 | 16:26 |
LimCore | he reported that, I just confirmed it | 16:26 |
LimCore | and converted to bug | 16:26 |
charlie-tca | micahg: did you look at the bug in question? LimCore filed it, LimCore commented on it, LimCore changed status to confirmed | 16:27 |
micahg | LimCore: that does look bad... | 16:27 |
LimCore | no | 16:27 |
LimCore | Zaki Akhmad asked it | 16:27 |
charlie-tca | I see nothing that says anyone else touched the bug | 16:27 |
micahg | LimCore: I didn't say wrong...I said looks bad | 16:27 |
LimCore | LimCore converted question to bug | 16:27 |
LimCore | 3 other bug commented it | 16:28 |
LimCore | 3 other people commented it | 16:28 |
LimCore | charlie-tca: how about reading my bug report fully, and noticing a link to the question with comments from multiply reporters? | 16:28 |
charlie-tca | If it is from a question, why wasn't the question converted back to a bug? | 16:29 |
LimCore | it was! I did it | 16:29 |
charlie-tca | Oh | 16:29 |
LimCore | duh | 16:29 |
LimCore | as I written there... | 16:29 |
LimCore | LimCore wrote 6 hours ago: Confirmed in the original question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub/+question/89461 | 16:29 |
micahg | charlie-tca: maybe Q's converted to bugs should import comments? | 16:29 |
micahg | like going the other way | 16:30 |
charlie-tca | I don't know, but reading the report, I see "The original reporter had the problem after upgraded from Jaunty to Karmic." But the original reporter that I can see is the person that filed the bug, LimCore | 16:30 |
thekorn | not a good idea, IMHO, because comments on Questions might contain some chatter which is not relevant to an bugreport | 16:31 |
micahg | LimCore: you should have put in the description about converting from a question | 16:31 |
micahg | charlie-tca: I think it was an honest mistake | 16:32 |
charlie-tca | that may be, but it still looks like the same person reported it, commented, and confirmed it. That was my original point. | 16:32 |
LimCore | micahg: ....... | 16:33 |
LimCore | micahg: I DID EXACTLY THAT | 16:33 |
LimCore | are people blind today or what ;) LimCore wrote 6 hours ago: Confirmed in the original question: [url] | 16:33 |
* charlie-tca is half-blind everyday | 16:34 | |
micahg | LimCore: no, that was a comment | 16:34 |
LimCore | some other dude reported it (as a Q) | 16:34 |
LimCore | then peoople reported it too | 16:34 |
micahg | it should have been in the original bug description... | 16:34 |
LimCore | also after upgrades of kernel | 16:34 |
thekorn | "This bug was originally described in qustion blabla, following the discussion on this question I decided to convert it to a bugreport. Original description by boobar. <here comes the description>" | 16:34 |
thekorn | something like this would make things more readable | 16:35 |
=== Kamokow is now known as Kamokow_ | ||
=== Kamokow_ is now known as Kamokow__ | ||
LimCore | done | 16:36 |
=== Kamokow__ is now known as _Kamokow | ||
=== _Kamokow is now known as __Kamokow | ||
=== __Kamokow is now known as Kamokow | ||
LimCore | if we are done with the beurocracy, how about setting importance (medium?) and figuring out how to fix that :) | 16:37 |
micahg | LimCore: great, thanks | 16:37 |
thekorn | LimCore, why medium? just because there a four people having this issue? | 16:40 |
thekorn | LimCore, also: have you checked if this bug has already been reported before you created this new one? | 16:42 |
thekorn | LimCore, maybe bug 500884 ? | 16:44 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 500884 in grub2 "Kernel 2.6.31-16 failed to install correctly" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/500884 | 16:44 |
vish | anyone know where is upstream for > Bug #386819 | 17:04 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 386819 in system-config-printer "cups can not delete all waiting jobs at once?" [Undecided,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386819 | 17:04 |
vish | "There is no bug supervisor for System Config Printer. This means that there is nobody upstream we can notify about this issue. " hmm?? | 17:22 |
charlie-tca | But all my xfce upstream bugs have that message, too. It isn't always true. | 17:38 |
charlie-tca | Wonder if you could ping Till about it? He seems to be the one with the most knowledge about printers/etc | 17:39 |
bdmurray | https://fedorahosted.org/system-config-printer/report/3 | 17:45 |
om26er | if a bug is to add an application to universe. what should be done for it? | 18:13 |
om26er | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516161 | 18:13 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 516161 in software-center "miksoft mobile media converter + easymp3gain into software center" [Undecided,New] | 18:13 |
jpds | om26er: Change to a [needs-packaging] bug. | 18:14 |
om26er | jpds, and make it ubuntu task? | 18:15 |
jpds | Yep. | 18:15 |
bcurtiswx_ | seb128: i think Bug #516168 should be assigned to Ubuntu Desktop team since it's Ubuntu specific.. would you take care of that? | 18:45 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 516168 in empathy ""Use message indicators" is not understandable" [Wishlist,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/516168 | 18:45 |
seb128 | bcurtiswx_, no | 18:45 |
bcurtiswx_ | seb128: its not upstream.. where should it go then? | 18:47 |
seb128 | bcurtiswx_, where it is now seems fine | 18:48 |
bcurtiswx_ | seb128: alrightie, thx | 18:49 |
seb128 | np | 18:49 |
strycore | Hi | 19:16 |
strycore | This default response https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Freeze%20during%20boot%20or%20shutdown%20screen needs to be updated for Lucid users | 19:18 |
strycore | I'm going to do it, I just wanted to make sure the modifications are ok | 19:18 |
strycore | This is the modified message I posted in a bug report : https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/516024 | 19:19 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 516024 in ubuntu "system does not shut down" [Undecided,New] | 19:19 |
yofel | strycore: indeed, the old response is still for grub-legacy, thanks :) | 19:26 |
yofel | strycore: bug didn't you have to hold 'Shift' pressed to get to the grub menu? (I always have the menu enabled so I'm not sure) | 19:27 |
yofel | s/bug/but | 19:29 |
strycore | I'll have to check that | 19:30 |
hggdh | pedro_: please count me in in helping on the bugsquad revamp | 19:55 |
bcurtiswx_ | pedro_: same here | 19:56 |
qense | pedro_: in case the mail wasn't enough: same here | 19:56 |
pedro_ | hggdh, bcurtiswx awesome folks! thank you | 19:56 |
pedro_ | qense, yeah we got it, thanks ;-) | 19:56 |
hggdh | :-) | 19:56 |
qense | good | 19:56 |
pedro_ | the more hands we have the better | 19:56 |
pedro_ | we're supposed to set the expiration date to ~half of the team | 19:57 |
hggdh | I agree, this is going to be, er, exciting | 19:57 |
pedro_ | so if only 30% of those re apply , it's going to be well... like hell | 19:57 |
pedro_ | heh | 19:57 |
qense | exciting indeed | 19:57 |
bcurtiswx_ | it will be the "most fun we can have with our pants on" :P | 19:58 |
qense | I already get way too much e-mail everyday | 19:58 |
micahg | pedro_: you can add me too, but I can't promise how much I can help | 19:58 |
pedro_ | there's not too much to check though so shouldn't be hard | 19:58 |
Pici | ww/24 | 19:58 |
Pici | er, thats not the command I wanted. | 19:58 |
qense | yeah, fortunately the requirements are small and easy to check | 19:58 |
pedro_ | micahg, awesome ! thanks | 19:58 |
pedro_ | I was really surprised to see that ~half of the team didn't even signed the CoC | 19:59 |
* hggdh was not *that* surprised. But a bit disapointed, though. | 19:59 | |
yofel | I was more surprised on how many joined the team and never did anything... | 19:59 |
pedro_ | would be nice to do the same exercise with teams like ubuntu-testing | 20:00 |
qense | it's disappointing to see how few people actually read and follow the documentation. | 20:00 |
pedro_ | yeah like ~48 % with 0 karma is pretty disappointing | 20:00 |
micahg | pedro_: if you could also prepare a stock reply for people that apply but shouldn't be accepted, that would be great | 20:00 |
yofel | pedro_: a question: *how exactly* can we help here? | 20:01 |
pedro_ | micahg, i'll do that and put it on the wiki page | 20:01 |
micahg | pedro_: thanks | 20:01 |
pedro_ | yofel, it's basically: check if the members who apply for renewal fit all the new requirements , if they do approve the membership and if they don't well don't do it | 20:02 |
pedro_ | yofel, nothing more complex than that | 20:02 |
yofel | ok, easy enough :) | 20:02 |
pedro_ | indeed ;-) | 20:03 |
qense | :P Since I joined the papercutters and subscribed to the Nautilus package I'm flooded with bug mail. | 20:03 |
bcurtiswx_ | we can reject them if they don't meet requirements.. but we'd try to inform them of what needs to be met.. | 20:03 |
qense | yes | 20:03 |
qense | Stock reply, anyone? | 20:03 |
bcurtiswx_ | how are we proving they've read How To Triage? | 20:04 |
yofel | qense: didn't micahg propose that just now? | 20:04 |
pedro_ | bcurtiswx, that's tricky to check, but if they say so that's enough | 20:04 |
micahg | yofel: yep :) | 20:04 |
qense | ok | 20:04 |
yofel | good :) | 20:04 |
bcurtiswx_ | pedro_: if only the world worked on word of mouth alone :P will do :D | 20:04 |
micahg | pedro_: is there a way to comment when petitioning? | 20:04 |
qense | I'd say: karma > 0 and if so, reasonable triaging results | 20:05 |
pedro_ | remember that we have the ubuntu bugcontrol team for asking complex questions regarding triague ;-) | 20:05 |
hggdh | yes. The idea is *not* to replace bug-control | 20:05 |
pedro_ | oops i was missing the "all new members/renewals need to send an email to the bugsquad list" | 20:06 |
bcurtiswx_ | qense: can we search through bug comments easily for the specific launchpad members requesting membership? | 20:06 |
micahg | does this help with the mentorship as well, or are these people unmentored? | 20:06 |
qense | bcurtiswx_: bugs.launchpad.net/~username ? | 20:06 |
bcurtiswx_ | qense: yes DUH | 20:06 |
* bcurtiswx_ walks in shame | 20:06 | |
BlackZ | hi pedro_ ;) | 20:06 |
bcurtiswx_ | aww i made him shame quit | 20:07 |
hggdh | micahg: the bugsquad is not required to be mentored | 20:07 |
pedro_ | micahg, well if they plan to join the bugcontrol team, for sure ;-) | 20:07 |
pedro_ | hola BlackZ! | 20:08 |
hggdh | qense: it is time, is it not? | 20:08 |
micahg | k, so the new bugsquad is supposed to be a more qualified version of bugsquad, but still at your own pace, unmentored | 20:08 |
qense | hggdh: yes, the time has come | 20:08 |
qense | ;) | 20:08 |
hggdh | qense: I am there | 20:09 |
qense | thx | 20:09 |
micahg | pedro_: are we setting expiring membership as well for the new bugsquad after reapplying or is it forever? | 20:09 |
bcurtiswx_ | ok, going home.. see me on bcurtiswx when i get there | 20:09 |
hggdh | folks -- whoever would like to cheer for qense, he is applying for membership now on -meetings | 20:09 |
qense | bye | 20:09 |
bcurtiswx_ | hggdh: aww, is he early on? | 20:09 |
qense | nah, probably not | 20:10 |
hggdh | bcurtiswx_: difficult to say, depends on who else is there. He may jump | 20:10 |
bcurtiswx_ | maybe i'll make it home b4.. and i'll give ya a cheer | 20:10 |
bcurtiswx_ | gonna drive like a maniac.. ok j/k.. bbs | 20:10 |
qense | that would be great, but please drive careful! :D | 20:10 |
qense | I'm not worth it! | 20:11 |
pedro_ | micahg, the subscription period is set to 1 year on the team, but we can change it to be something like 3 months and after that 1 year | 20:11 |
pedro_ | what do you guys think about that? | 20:11 |
pedro_ | we have a similar setup for the bugcontrol team | 20:11 |
qense | I agree with a short first period. A lot of people leave the first month and this makes sure we don't keep too many of those ghosts in the team. | 20:12 |
yofel | +1 | 20:12 |
hggdh | +1 | 20:12 |
micahg | +1 | 20:12 |
qense | +1 | 20:12 |
pedro_ | ok cool ;-) | 20:13 |
hggdh | LOL | 20:14 |
qense | darn! unstable themes are dangerous! | 20:15 |
vish | qense: nice karma you got goin ;) "9999" next up 10000 :) | 20:16 |
qense | yes, maybe I should take a screenshot of that | 20:16 |
qense | Appropriate for a Membership request, don't you think? | 20:17 |
* micahg doesn't remember anyone else's karma being mentioned in applications, but mine... | 20:18 | |
micahg | it was a little joke in my approval blurb | 20:18 |
qense | They just check if your karma isn't very low. | 20:19 |
bcurtiswx | qense: went yet? | 20:31 |
qense | no, I think I'm up next | 20:31 |
hggdh | yes. the EMEA is always fast | 20:33 |
qense | Are other boards slower? | 20:34 |
hggdh | yes, some are. Quite more so. | 20:35 |
* bcurtiswx ROFL @ -meeting | 20:36 | |
qense | :P | 20:38 |
* bcurtiswx congrats qense | 20:38 | |
qense | thank you guys | 20:38 |
hggdh | you see. *Very* fast... | 20:38 |
micahg | congrata qense | 20:38 |
hggdh | welcome in | 20:38 |
qense | I'm happy | 20:38 |
bcurtiswx | welcome in | 20:38 |
bcurtiswx | we all were when we wer ein your shoes | 20:39 |
bcurtiswx | were in* | 20:39 |
hggdh | indeed | 20:39 |
qense | you were there to support me, but it wasn't needed | 20:39 |
cjohnston | congrats qense | 20:39 |
qense | thank you all | 20:39 |
pedro_ | congrats qense!! | 20:39 |
hggdh | my pleasure, qense | 20:39 |
pedro_ | just saw the email ;-) | 20:39 |
bcurtiswx | we need an initiation..... | 20:39 |
bcurtiswx | ok maybe not | 20:39 |
qense | that was a lot quicker than I expected | 20:40 |
bcurtiswx | you slid through there faster than the bobsledders will in a week or two :P | 20:40 |
hggdh | and now, a question for all: anyone used weechat *and* Lucid? I am packaging weechat GIT on my PPA | 20:40 |
bcurtiswx | what is weechat? | 20:41 |
hggdh | (and coreutils GIT, also) | 20:41 |
hggdh | a command-line IRC client/server | 20:41 |
qense | I have not | 20:41 |
qense | Isn't IRSSI the hardcore IRC client? | 20:42 |
hggdh | yes irssi is considered the hardcore IRC client. But I (personally) do not like it, and found weechat to be easier | 20:43 |
bcurtiswx | i never used it.. thats why im using xchat-gnome | 20:43 |
qense | so am I | 20:44 |
qense | I also use gedit, no vim or emacs | 20:44 |
hggdh | oooohhhh, no vi or emacs, ooooohhhh | 20:44 |
hggdh | everytime I try gedit, I end up CTRL/something, and messing the text | 20:44 |
qense | I know, I'm one of those bad youngsters. The new generation doesn use CLI! | 20:44 |
* hggdh has just been reminded of age ... | 20:45 | |
* hggdh spits the denture while ROFL, and has to get it cleaned before reuse | 20:45 | |
qense | I hope I didn't hurt your feelings too much! | 20:46 |
* micahg feels old after looking at qense's age on the wiki | 20:46 | |
qense | I got sent the job description for the GNOME contractor Canonical was looking for. That was funny. | 20:47 |
hggdh | my sons are older... | 20:47 |
hggdh | apply... | 20:47 |
qense | I don't have the time | 20:48 |
charlie-tca | hggdh: you do know weechat in lucid is up to date? | 20:50 |
charlie-tca | I have used it with no issues yet | 20:51 |
charlie-tca | Is that going to be a newer version? | 20:51 |
charlie-tca | Congrats, qense | 20:52 |
hggdh | charlie-tca: yes, this is the next version. Lucid has 0.3.0, and the GIT is at 0.3.2 | 20:52 |
qense | charlie-tca: thanks | 20:53 |
charlie-tca | hggdh: Great! Let me know when it is ready, okay? | 20:53 |
hggdh | charlie-tca: will do. I have been using it with no issues so far, but it is still under development | 20:54 |
charlie-tca | I been bouncing back and forth between weechat and xchat. Xchat don't work right in lucid, though | 20:54 |
hggdh | I tried xchat for quite some time, but it was breaking on encrypted conversations | 20:54 |
charlie-tca | I can use it with ssl, at least | 20:56 |
=== emma_ is now known as emma | ||
qense | I'm off, bye guys! | 21:10 |
LimCore_ | some meeting today? | 21:38 |
LimCore_ | about people leaving | 21:39 |
LimCore_ | Im reporting serious bugs for like 2 years now (3+ outside ubuntu) how can I be on bug controll to faster process some reports | 21:39 |
hggdh | LimCore_: see https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-bugcontrol/ | 21:40 |
=== go is now known as Guest58956 | ||
=== Guest58956 is now known as gomyhr | ||
vish | hggdh: which ML has this discussion been going on? | 21:51 |
vish | regarding bug squad | 21:52 |
thekorn | vish, ubuntu-bugsquad | 21:52 |
* vish scratches head... searches lp for bug squad ml | 21:53 | |
hggdh | brbb, reboot | 21:53 |
thekorn | vish, https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-bugsquad/2010-February/thread.html | 21:53 |
vish | thekorn: thanks :) i was looking for it here > https://launchpad.net/~bugsquad | 21:54 |
thekorn | right, the team is still using the old(ish) list.ubuntu.com ML, maybe we should consider moving the ML to launchpad as part of this reorganisation process | 21:56 |
vish | yeah , mailing kinda eats/delays mails sometimes | 21:57 |
vish | mailman* | 21:57 |
yofel | thekorn: indeed, wasn't there some discussion about this on UDS too? (Or maybe I'm mixing something up...) | 22:00 |
yofel | it would make it easier to check if someone is subscribed to the ML too... | 22:00 |
yofel | hm, pedro isn't here :/ | 22:02 |
charlie-tca | yofel: this gives the details - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/SpecialisationWithinBugcontrol | 22:04 |
vish | hmm , I'd be glad to help too , | 22:05 |
* vish doesnt see pedro around :( | 22:05 | |
vish | ah , he's back | 22:05 |
yofel | yep, at the bottom | 22:06 |
vish | pedro_: i can help with the renewals too :) | 22:06 |
yofel | pedro_: do you know if someone has thought some more about moving the bugsquad ML to launchpad? | 22:06 |
pedro_ | hello vish!, cool thanks | 22:06 |
vish | np.. | 22:06 |
pedro_ | yofel, we did thought about that during UDS, i'm waiting for the response of some launchpad folks so the movement can be smoothly | 22:07 |
pedro_ | but yes, that'd be nice | 22:08 |
yofel | it would make checking if someone is subscribed to it much easier... | 22:08 |
Dan_E | bugs | 22:10 |
Dan_E | bugs | 22:11 |
hggdh | ? | 22:11 |
vish | Dan_E: hi.. need help filing bugs ? or want to triage bugs | 22:11 |
pedro_ | where where? :-) | 22:11 |
vish | lol | 22:11 |
yofel | ^^ | 22:12 |
Dan_E | just seeing if i could send to the channel. some are having trouble | 22:12 |
Dan_E | sorry | 22:12 |
vish | Dan_E: you can use !test factoid | 22:13 |
vish | !test | 22:13 |
ubot4 | hrm? | 22:13 |
Dan_E | k | 22:13 |
charlie-tca | Might need to have a registered nick now? | 22:13 |
hggdh | are we +r? | 22:13 |
charlie-tca | I don't know | 22:14 |
yofel | hm, we're +Ccntz | 22:14 |
charlie-tca | not it then | 22:14 |
* yofel goes checking what that means for ircd-seven | 22:14 | |
hggdh | well, there is that, also, we are now -seven | 22:14 |
yofel | hm, you can't send messages to the channel from the outside, but should be fine otherwise. If ircd-seven isn't acting up | 22:17 |
chrisccoulson | charlie-tca - generally, we don't set desktop bugs (ie, those in https://edge.launchpad.net/~desktop-bugs/+packagebugs) to triaged until they've been forwarded upstream, if they're an upstream issue. otherwise, they will just sit around in launchpad for years until somebody looks at them again | 22:56 |
* charlie-tca slaps head; he knew that, but screwed up | 22:57 | |
chrisccoulson | (i just noticed you set bug 498366 to triaged) | 22:57 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 498366 in gnome-screensaver "built-in X.Org screensaver always activates in Xubuntu after 10 minutes" [Low,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/498366 | 22:57 |
chrisccoulson | charlie-tca - no worries ;) | 22:57 |
charlie-tca | Why is that a package bug? | 22:57 |
charlie-tca | that is an issue in xubuntu 9.10, what does packaging have to do with it? | 22:58 |
chrisccoulson | charlie-tca - did i say anything about packaging? gnome-screensaver is one of the packages we look after on the desktop team. so, we wouldn't set it to triaged until it's been forwarded upstream | 22:59 |
chrisccoulson | although, in this case, it's not clear what the issue is yet (or if there is a bug at all) | 22:59 |
charlie-tca | It hasn't worked in xubuntu since karmic 2 | 22:59 |
kklimonda | hmm, no idea where to ask so here it goes: I've created files !a !b !_j and j - then I've listed files sorted by name - why is !_j after j and not after !a and !b? | 23:01 |
bcurtiswx | so how do I reply to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462994 ?? | 23:29 |
ubot4 | Launchpad bug 462994 in telepathy-mission-control-5 "Account details unremovable." [Low,Invalid] | 23:29 |
kklimonda | I don't understand how would someone expect removing package to remove his own configuration but I guess I'm just too used to Linux and not used to Windows.. | 23:34 |
kklimonda | bcurtiswx: is the bug that if mission control is running when files in home directory are deleted it recreates them at shutdown? | 23:35 |
kklimonda | bcurtiswx: or that --purge doesn't remove files from home directory? | 23:35 |
bcurtiswx | i am not 100% sure, but it appears that way... actually both may happen and i think were commented on | 23:36 |
kklimonda | bcurtiswx: removing ~/.mission-control/ was enough for me to remove accounts - after I've logged out and logged in I had to create new account in empathy | 23:45 |
kklimonda | hmm.. | 23:45 |
kklimonda | oh well | 23:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!