| === Keybuk_ is now known as Keybuk | ||
| rittyan | hi all, is there some debhelper or cdbs thingie to install upstart jobs to the right place? | 14:05 |
|---|---|---|
| rittyan | I could use install file, but I don't want to (not the right place in fact) | 14:06 |
| rittyan | or, probably package.upstart will do the trick | 14:07 |
| Md | rittyan: read the dh_installinit documentation | 14:14 |
| rittyan | yup, found it already | 14:16 |
| rittyan | thanks | 14:16 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: for future reference, we have this policy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath | 22:53 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: not that I have an opinion but its making libnih kinda annoying to package. | 22:53 |
| Keybuk | err, why? | 22:54 |
| Keybuk | (not why don't you like rpath, but why are you getting one?) | 22:54 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: I didn't do anything interesting when I built it | 22:55 |
| Keybuk | wing-commander scott% objdump -x /lib/libnih.so | grep RPATH | 22:55 |
| Keybuk | zsh: done objdump -x /lib/libnih.so | | 22:55 |
| Keybuk | zsh: exit 1 grep RPATH | 22:55 |
| Keybuk | I have no rpath | 22:55 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: its libnih-dbus and nih-dbus-tool which its finding them in | 22:55 |
| Keybuk | noep | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | wing-commander scott% objdump -x /usr/bin/nih-dbus-tool | egrep "NEEDED|RPATH" | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | NEEDED libnih.so.1 | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | NEEDED libexpat.so.1 | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | NEEDED libdbus-1.so.3 | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | NEEDED libpthread.so.0 | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | NEEDED libc.so.6 | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | wing-commander scott% | 22:56 |
| sadmac | ERROR 0001: file '/usr/lib64/libnih-dbus.so.1.0.0' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] | 22:56 |
| sadmac | ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/nih-dbus-tool' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] | 22:56 |
| Keybuk | oh | 22:57 |
| Keybuk | well | 22:57 |
| Keybuk | that's your busted distribution | 22:57 |
| sadmac | don't think the template spec is doing anything beyond configure/make/make install | 22:57 |
| Keybuk | if you're going to invent things like /usr/lib64 you need to tell your dynamic linker about it, etc. | 22:57 |
| sadmac | notting: ^^what is this shit? | 22:57 |
| notting | context? | 22:57 |
| Keybuk | libtool only puts an rpath in if you install into a path it doesn't recognise as a system library path | 22:58 |
| notting | usually it's libtool being shite | 22:58 |
| sadmac | notting: is there a standard fix? | 22:58 |
| Keybuk | notting: hardly | 22:59 |
| Keybuk | if Fedora bothered to send patches upstream, you wouldn't have this problem ;) | 22:59 |
| Keybuk | even when I was libtool upstream, we patiently waited for Fedora/RH to submit http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/libtool/libtool-2.2.6a-rpath.patch?view=log | 22:59 |
| Keybuk | but nobody ever did | 22:59 |
| notting | you were libtool upstream? i don't know whether to blame you or send booze | 22:59 |
| Keybuk | sadmac: you should be able to apply that patch to m4/libtool.m4 in libnih's tree | 22:59 |
| Keybuk | notting: once :) | 23:00 |
| Keybuk | sadmac: you'll need to re-run autoconf afterwards to regenerate configure | 23:00 |
| Keybuk | then it should not rpath lib64 | 23:00 |
| notting | you can cheat and do 'make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool'. but that obviously can have version-skew | 23:01 |
| sadmac | the page I linked recommends a couple of sed lines. I'm afraid... but it is policy... | 23:02 |
| Keybuk | you can | 23:02 |
| Keybuk | all of these are valid | 23:02 |
| Keybuk | but it's not _my_ problem ;) | 23:02 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: my mistake | 23:02 |
| Keybuk | strictly speaking, of course, your policy is wrong | 23:03 |
| Keybuk | since /usr/lib64 is *not* a standard library directory | 23:03 |
| Keybuk | you should have rpaths for it | 23:03 |
| Keybuk | since otherwise libraries and binaries compiled on RH won't work on other distros ;P | 23:03 |
| sadmac | the sed things don't work. | 23:03 |
| Keybuk | but I digress | 23:03 |
| sadmac | makes the build choke | 23:03 |
| notting | Keybuk: the compiler thinks it's standard | 23:04 |
| Keybuk | notting: only because you have a patch to your compiler | 23:04 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: kernel32.dll doesn't work in ubuntu either :) distro-compatibility is a pipe dream. | 23:04 |
| Keybuk | sadmac: sure it does, apt-get install wine ;) | 23:04 |
| Keybuk | sadmac: is the sed for libtool 1.5 or 2.x ? | 23:04 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: try libc.dylib :) | 23:05 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: unspecified. | 23:05 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: snippets floating in wikispace unknown and unloved | 23:05 |
| notting | Keybuk: i could bring up the LSB stick, but, bleah. | 23:05 |
| notting | but yes, the proper solution is to patch upstream libtool releases, get that in every distro, and make everyone redist their packages. wheee. | 23:07 |
| sadmac | ugh. my apartment can be either 40 or 80 degrees. the thermostat ignores intermediate values. | 23:08 |
| Keybuk | notting: sure | 23:08 |
| sadmac | damn it to hell. | 23:16 |
| sadmac | rpmbuild is eating the error output of patch | 23:16 |
| sadmac | oh. oh wow. that is unfortunate. | 23:20 |
| sadmac | makes sense though | 23:20 |
| sadmac | %prep doesn't define the patch macros at all. | 23:20 |
| sadmac | no, this is %build hold on.. | 23:21 |
| sadmac | I haven't built a new package in a while. | 23:30 |
| ion | Fedora/RH could always switch to dpkg. | 23:33 |
| sadmac | ion: coke, pepsi, whatever. | 23:33 |
| sadmac | IMHO if the difference between your old package manager and your new one is any smaller than the difference between rpm and conary you're an idiot to switch | 23:33 |
| sadmac | which is not to say you should switch to conary | 23:34 |
| sadmac | Point is I can't in good faith support Jesse not seeing his kid for 2 months so we can switch to a /slightly better RPM/ | 23:34 |
| sadmac | besides, the package manager I want to use I haven't written yet. | 23:35 |
| ion | I was joking, of course. | 23:37 |
| sadmac | ion: all in good fun :) | 23:39 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: the pkgconfig stuff ended up in lib rather than lib64 too :( guess we didn't fix autoconf either. | 23:40 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: ah, this one is your fault | 23:44 |
| Keybuk | why? | 23:47 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: you defined pkgconfig's data path explicitly in Makefile.am | 23:48 |
| Keybuk | yes | 23:48 |
| Keybuk | if you put it in the wrong path, that's your fault :) | 23:48 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: is there a separate list for libnih development now? | 23:52 |
| Keybuk | no | 23:58 |
| sadmac | Keybuk: good. patch is on upstart-devel | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!