[00:37] <jussi01> !search equivalent
[00:37] <jussi01> !equivalents | erUSUL
[01:06] <lfaraone> Is the owner of ubottu about?
[01:07] <erUSUL> !ask
[01:07] <lfaraone> erUSUL: I asked it yesterday, and didn't get a reply. Anyhoo, can ubottu join #ubuntu-us-dc?
[01:08] <erUSUL> jussi01: tsimpson ^
[09:57] <jussi01> jpds: nalioth, could you please put a clone into #ubuntu-us-dc
[10:39] <jpds> jussi01: Done.
[10:42] <jussi01> jpds: thanks!
[10:49] <Tm_T> jpds: #ubuntu-fi too?
[10:50] <jussi01> Tm_T: nalioth still hasnt restarted ubot3?
[10:50] <jussi01> grumble
[10:50] <Tm_T> nope
[10:51] <jpds> Tm_T: Done.
[10:52]  * Tm_T huggles jpds
[11:07] <Tm_T> hi Mamarok
[11:08] <Mamarok> hi Tm_T
[16:33] <m4v> erUSUL: overmind in #ubuntu-es is BlouBlou, no mistake, should we remove him?
[16:33] <erUSUL> if it is a sure thing then go ahead
[16:36] <m4v> he's doing all the "hi, I'm new" act, meaning, he's not going to honestly change.
[16:38] <m4v> erUSUL: yes, I looked over all my logs, there's no mistake, he does the same things that bloublou does and nobody else's
[16:38] <m4v> erUSUL: I'm just telling you 'cause he'll probably complain in -es-ops
[16:46] <m4v> erUSUL: I'll be /query him first.
[16:46] <m4v> s/be//
[17:06] <m4v> ok, he didn't drop the act nor accept to leave the channel.
[17:08] <Tm_T> hrr
[17:17] <erUSUL> m4v: sorry has to go away a while ...
[17:17] <erUSUL> m4v: so he denies being nehyx?
[17:17] <m4v> yep
[17:18] <m4v> I already removed him
[17:19] <m4v> he disconnected right after that
[17:19] <erUSUL> yep just checked
[17:19] <erUSUL> well its ok; we will se if comes again
[17:19] <bazhang> he's nehyx huh
[17:21] <erUSUL> using tor;
[17:35] <m4v> erUSUL: he now admitted to be nehyx/bloublou in #supremos, along with some profanity directed at me
[17:35] <m4v> I really don't now what's wrong with this guy
[17:37] <erUSUL> just a troll there are a lot of them; this is just more persistent ;)
[18:01] <erUSUL> !grb2
[18:01] <erUSUL> !grub2
[18:56] <arand> Re: flash, should we only be recommending flashplugin-installer, since -nonfree is transitional, or does it not matter?
[22:30] <rww> arand: -installer is better if you know they're using an Ubuntu version that has it. -nonfree would still work, because it'll install the installer package, though.
[22:35] <arand> rww: hmm, -installer is there from jaunty-onwards, altough.. -nonfree seems to be the source package still, from where -nonfree and -installer is built, so I guess it's not going away in a hurry then...
[22:36] <erUSUL> why is intaller better?
[22:37] <arand> Since -nonfree is designated as a transitional package, and I guess the original idea, at least, was to get rid of -nonfree (naming concerns?)
[23:01] <m4v> I usually recommend ubuntu-restricted-extras, but now I'm not sure if it installs the same flash, it says adobe-flashplugin..
[23:04] <tsimpson> they all do the same thing really
[23:05] <m4v> ah, good to know
[23:11] <rww> m4v: It says adobe-flashplugin or flashplugin-installer. I believe adobe-flashplugin is the Canonical partner repository package from which flashplugin-installer gets the things it installs anyway.